A biomechanical study of lumbar fusion based on a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element method

Biomechanical analyses under compression, flexion, and extension loading were performed to evaluate the stability of interbody, posterolateral, posterior, and facet fusions using a nonlinear three-dimensional finite element method. The effects of facet fusion on other lumbar fusions were also examined. A three-dimensional L4-L5 motion segment model was developed that took into consideration the material nonlinearities of ligaments and annular fibers and the contact nonlinearities of facet joints. Of all models of fusion, maximum rigidity was obtained in the interbody fusion model. In the posterolateral, posterior, and facet fusion models under compression, axial displacement and flexion rotation were induced. In combination with facet fusion, the interbody, posterolateral, and posterior fusion models demonstrated a decrease in axial displacement of about 6%, 1%, and 5%, respectively, under compression and a decrease in rotation angle of about 22%, 12%, and 48%, respectively, under flexion-extension loading. Stress concentration moved principally toward the fusion site, indicating increased load transfer across the fusion mass. Our findings suggest that a more solid fixation can be expected from lumbar fusion--especially in posterior fusion--if facet fusion is performed.     

A biomechanical study of posterolateral lumbar fusion using a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element method

Biomechanical analyses under compressive load, flexion, and extension torque were performed, using a nonlinear three-dimensional finite element method, to evaluate stability in posterolateral fusion. Effects of facet fusion and disc denucleation on posterolateral fusion were also examined. Using an initially prepared L4–5 motion segment model, we prepared a denucleation model, posterolateral fusion models classified by presence or absence of denucleation and facet fusion, and an interbody fusion model. In the denucleation model, rigidity was less than in the normal model, and maximum rigidity was analyzed for the interbody fusion model. The effect of denucleation on posterolateral fusion was also analyzed. Taking into account the instability of the anterior elements, including the intervertebral disc, appears to be clinically important. In the posterolateral fusion model under compressive load, the axis of rotation moved principally toward the fusion mass, and axial displacement and flexion rotation were induced. Sagittal rotation angles under flexion and extension torque were 1.5°–2.3° at a maximum moment of 15 N-m, demonstrating elasticity of posterolateral fusion. When combined with facet fusion, posterolateral fusion yielded increase of load transfer across the lamina and decrease of rotation angle of about 10% under flexion-extension torque. Adjunctive clinical use of facet fusion should permit more solid posterolateral fusion. Received for publication on Dec. 4, 1997; accepted on Oct. 26, 1998     

Lumbar lordosis restoration following single-level instrumented fusion comparing 4 commonly used techniques

A major sequelae of lumbar fusion is acceleration of adjacent-level degeneration due to decreased lumbar lordosis. We evaluated the effectiveness of 4 common fusion techniques in restoring lordosis: instrumented posterolateral fusion, translumbar interbody fusion, anteroposterior fusion with posterior instrumentation, and anterior interbody fusion with lordotic threaded (LT) cages (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee). Radiographs were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. Parameters measured included anterior and posterior disk space height, lumbar lordosis from L3 to S1, and surgical level lordosis.No significant difference in demographics existed among the 4 groups. All preoperative parameters were similar among the 4 groups. Lumbar lordosis at final follow-up showed no difference between the anteroposterior fusion with posterior instrumentation, translumbar interbody fusion, and LT cage groups, although the posterolateral fusion group showed a significant loss of lordosis (-10°) (P<.001). Immediately postoperatively and at follow-up, the LT cage group had a significantly greater amount of lordosis and showed maintenance of anterior and posterior disk space height postoperatively compared with the other groups. Instrumented posterolateral fusion produces a greater loss of lordosis compared with anteroposterior fusion with posterior instrumentation, translumbar interbody fusion, and LT cages. Maintenance of lordosis and anterior and posterior disk space height is significantly better with anterior interbody fusion with LT cages.     

Bilateral facet dislocation on L4-L5 without neurologic deficit

We present a case of traumatic bilateral facet dislocation of L4-L5 without neurologic deficit in a 47-year-old woman after a motor vehicle accident. We considered that the mechanism of injury was the composition of hyperflexion, distraction, and rotation. Open reduction was easily performed when the obstacles consisting of the disrupted joint capsule and synovial membrane were completely removed. Also, posterior interbody and posterolateral fusion and pedicle screw augmentation are recommended because of surgeon familiarity, the absence of additional injury for unstable injury, and the safety of this treatment.     

The Steffee variable screw placement system using different methods of bone grafting.

Two groups of patients with diseased lumbar spines treated by the Steffee variable screw placement system were studied, in order to compare concomitant posterolateral fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The use of posterolateral fusion resulted in less invasiveness than posterior lumbar interbody fusion, with regard to operating time and blood loss. With the posterolateral fusion method, correction of olisthesis or kyphotic deformity, if attained at all, was difficult to maintain. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion produced better correction and maintenance, even in osteoporotic cases. Bone union was achieved at an average of 11 months in only 60% of the posterolateral fusion group, whereas it was complete within a significantly shorter period (average; 6 months) in 91% of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group. Breakage or loosening of screws occurred in 14% of the posterolateral fusion group. Deep wound infection and adhesive arachnoiditis, which were never seen in the posterolateral fusion group, developed in 3% of the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion is considered to be a better method of bone grafting than posterolateral fusion, when used with the Steffee variable screw placement system.     

Neuroforaminal chondrocyte metaplasia and clustering associated with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 usage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Background contextRecombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is commonly used to augment posterior and interbody spinal fusion techniques and has many reported side effects. Neuroforaminal heterotopic ossification (HO) is a known cause of postoperative leg pain, but the pathohistologic composition of this material is not well understood.PurposeThe purpose of this article was to report the histologic composition of a case of HO and lumbar radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2.Study design/settingThis is a case report.Patient sampleThis is a single patient case report.Outcome measuresThe outcomes considered were physician-recorded clinical, physiological, and functional measures.MethodsA retrospective review of a single patient was performed. Clinical, radiographic, and pathologic specimens were reviewed and are reported.ResultsA 69-year-old woman presented with low back pain and right leg radicular pain associated with L4–L5 stenosis and a recurrent facet cyst. After attempted nonsurgical care, she underwent an L4–L5 revision decompression with interbody and posterolateral fusions including off-label rhBMP-2. Postoperatively, her symptoms resolved for approximately 7 months but then returned in association with right L4–L5 foraminal HO. The ectopic tissue was notably larger than suggested by preoperative computed tomographic scan. It was decompressed, which then improved her symptoms. Histologic examination of the specimen revealed three discrete tissue types: a nonspecific fibrovascular stroma; immature osteoid and woven bone; and chondrocyte metaplasia with chondrocyte clustering.ConclusionsNeuroforaminal HO formation is a reported side effect associated with the off-label use of rhBMP-2 for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The mechanism of formation and the composition of this material are not well understood but may involve a chondrocyte differentiation pathway.     

"Silent" spinal dislocation in a Charcot spine occurring postlaminectomy: case report and review of literature

A 45-year-old man with transverse myelitis developed an unstable neuropathic spinal arthropathy manifesting as a "silent" L1-L2 dislocation after laminectomy and rhizotomies performed for increased spasticity. Treatment consisted of reduction, posterolateral spinal fusion with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation utilizing hooks and pedicular screws, and a posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The authors conclude that laminectomy on a chronic paralytic through the insensate area should be coupled with fusion and instrumentation even if the facet joints and capsules are preserved during the laminectomy.     

Traumatic bilateral locked facet at L4-5: report of a case associated with incorrect use of a three-point seatbelt

We present a case of traumatic L4-5 bilateral facet dislocation, without neurological deficit, in a 32-year-old female patient, as an unusual seatbelt injury caused by positioning the shoulder harness improperly under her armpit. Open reduction, posterior interbody fusion, and posterior segmental instrumentation were carried out. The aim of this report is to describe this rarely encountered condition and speculate regarding automotive shoulder harness misuse as a potential cause of bilateral locked facet at L4-5, and to emphasize the importance of multidirectional X-ray on first examination. The unusual L4-5 level facet interlocking was attributed to misuse of the automobile shoulder harness. We propose the importance of recognizing this injury and following up on such clues as transverse process fractures and/or widened posterior elements.     

Residual motion on flexion-extension radiographs after simulated lumbar arthrodesis in human cadavers

Flexion-extension radiographs are commonly used to assess lumbar fusion. Recommended criteria for solid fusion have varied from 1 to 5 degrees of angular motion between vertebrae. Notwithstanding this wide variation, the validity of these criteria have never been biomechanically tested. As a preliminary and initial step, it was the authors' purpose to quantify measurable angular motion after simulating solid lumbar fusion in human cadaver spines. Seven cadaveric spines (L1 to L4) were tested in a radiolucent jig fixed to a servohydraulic testing apparatus. Flexion and extension moments of 10 Nm were applied. Fusion was simulated using metallic implants spanning the L2-L3 motion segment. These included transverse process plates, a spinous process plate, pedicle screw construct, or an anterior vertebral body plate to simulate an intertransverse, interspinous process, facet, and interbody fusions, respectively. Angular movements were measured on lateral radiographs and statistically compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Simulated intertransverse fusion resulted in 13+/-4 degrees of motion; interspinous fusion, 9+/-4 degrees; posterior facet fusion, 5+/-3 degrees; and interbody fusion with plate, 3+/-2 degrees. Compared with the intact, only posterior facet fusion and interbody fusion with plate had statistically significantly less motion (P=0.006 and 0.0001, respectively). The amount of radiographically detectable flexion-extension motion with simulated fusions varies widely and seems to be influenced by fusion type. This study documents a range of measurable motion on flexion-extension radiographs after several types of simulated lumbar fusion. However, as the degrees of motion seemed to be high, future studies should use a fusion simulation other than metallic implants that more closely resembles bony arthrodesis.     

Update review and clinical presentation on chronic low back pain treated by AxiaLIF

Paracoccygeal approach to the L5–S1 junction with transsacral instrumentation was described recently as an alternative method to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A percutaneous L5–S1 discectomy, interbody distraction, and fixation could be achieved while preserving the integrity of the muscles, ligaments, and disc anulus. Retroperitoneal viscera and dorsal neural elements are avoided via the presacral safe zone. Additional pedicle or facet screw fixation is recommended to provide stabilization and promote fusion. AxiaLIF represents a solid-based fusion technique for degenerative disc disease at L5–S1 level with minimal collateral damage in carefully selected patients.     

Anterior fibular strut grafting for the treatment of pseudoarthrosis in spondylolisthesis

Ten patients with a failed posterior spinal fusion for symptomatic spondylolisthesis were treated with retroperitoneal anterior lumbosacral interbody fusion. A fibular strut allograft was placed, followed by posterolateral fusion and instrumentation. The mean follow-up was 40 months (range 24-60 months). All patients complained of back pain and leg pain before surgery. All patients achieved solid fusion at L5-S1. One patient developed pseudoarthrosis at L4-5 and improved symptomatically with no postoperative complications.     

Does spinal kyphotic deformity influence the biomechanical characteristics of the adjacent motion segments? An in vivo animal model.

STUDY DESIGN: In an in vivo sheep model, the effects of spinal fusion and kyphotic deformity on the neighboring motion segments were analyzed. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of spinal fusion and kyphotic deformity on the adjacent motion segment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The in vivo effects of kyphotic deformity on the neighboring motion segments have not been investigated in any studies. METHODS: Eighteen sheep were equally randomized into three groups based on surgical procedure: L3-L5 in situ posterolateral fusion (n = 6) L3-L5 kyphotic posterolateral fusion (n = 6), and surgical exposure alone (n = 6). After a 16-week survival period, the adjacent motion segment changes were analyzed radiographically, biomechanically, and histologically. RESULTS: The kyphosis group showed 5.0 degrees +/- 2.6 degrees and 1.7 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees compensatory hyperlordosis at L2-L3 and L5-L6, respectively, compared with surgical exposure and in situ posterolateral fusion, the kyphotic posterolateral fusion significantly influenced cranial adjacent motion segment biomechanics by inducing more stiffness in the posterior ligamentous complex (P < 0.05) and increasing lamina strain under flexion-extension loading (P < 0.05). Results of histologic analysis showed significant degenerative changes of the L2-L3 facet joints in the kyphosis group. CONCLUSIONS: It is inferred that in the kyphosis group, compensatory hyperlordosis at the cranial adjacent level leads to lordotic contracture of the posterior ligamentous complex. The increased lamina strain, exhibited by the in situ group under flexion-extension, was further increased in the kyphosis group, indicating higher load transmission through the posterior column. Significant degenerative changes of the cephalad adjacent facet joints observed in the kyphosis group served to corroborate the biomechanical data. These results indicate that a kyphotic deformity may lead to facet joint contracture and facet arthritis and may serve as the origin of low back pain at the cranial adjacent level.     

A preliminary comparative study of radiographic results using mineralized collagen and bone marrow aspirate versus autologous bone in the same patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion with instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Multiple bone graft substitutes for spinal fusion have been studied with varying results. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a mineralized collagen matrix combined with bone marrow, versus autologous bone, in the same patients undergoing a posterior lumbar interbody fusion and an instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A prospective, comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients indicated for one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion and instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion, serving as self-controls. OUTCOME MEASURES: Thin-cut computed tomographic scans with sagittal reconstruction and plain radiographs, including lateral flexion/extension views were performed and assessed at 12 and 24 months after surgery. Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale questionnaires were completed by all patients preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months after surgery. METHODS: After informed consent and failure of nonoperative treatment, 25 consecutive patients requiring one-level instrumented posterolateral fusion combined with posterior interbody fusion were enrolled in the study. Mineralized collagen bone graft substitute combined with bone marrow aspirate was used on one side of the posterolateral fusion, with iliac crest autograft on the contralateral side. RESULTS: A fusion rate of 84% (21/25) was achieved for the autologous bone grafts and 80% (20/25) for the bone graft substitute. The interbody fusion rate was 92% (23/25). Mean Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores decreased 57.2% at 12 months and 55.6% at 24 months, compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Mineralized collagen bone graft substitute exhibited similar radiographic results compared with autograft in this model. Further trials incorporating bilateral fusion, as well as posterolateral fusion alone without interbody fusion are warranted to confirm the results of this study.     

Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation on adjacent levels

PurposeAdjacent segment degeneration or fracture of the vertebral body was commonly reported in rigid fusion. Use of semirigid instruments such as PEEK rod system could be an alternative treatment. However, the biomechanical implications of using PEEK rod systems are not well understood. Purpose of this study was to compare a PEEK rod fixation system to traditional titanium rod fixation via a finite element analysis.MethodsA lumbar spine model from L2–L5 vertebral bodies was constructed. A fusion model, created by modifying the intact lumbar model, was used to simulate anterior interbody and posterolateral lumbar fusion. Loading was applied through flexion, extension, lateral bending, torsion.ResultsThe greatest increase in stress was estimated at the upper disc adjacent to the titanium rod with interbody fusion. The lower increase in stress on adjacent segments occurred with PEEK rod fixation without fusion and noninstrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion models. With the same fusion or nonfusion procedures, the stress on discs and facet joints of adjacent segments in the PEEK rod group decreased by 5–25% of that in the titanium rod group for all loading conditions.ConclusionIn comparison with rigid fixation, some potential advantages of using PEEK rod systems include a reduced stress on adjacent segment disc and facet joint, and the elastic ability of PEEK rod fixation allows for a greater range of motion, which may reduce the incidence of clinical complications seen with rigid fusion devices.     

Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion versus non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective study with a 2-year follow-up

BackgroundSurgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis is widely performed. However, there have been no reports comparing posterolateral and anterior interbody fusion prospectively. We compared instrumented posterolateral fusion with anterior interbody fusion for L4 spondylolisthesis in a prospective study.MethodsForty-six patients diagnosed with L4 degenerated spondylolisthesis were divided into two groups. Twenty-two consecutive patients underwent non-instrumented anterior interbody fusion using an iliac bone graft (ALIF; L4-L5 level), and 24 consecutive patients underwent instrumented posterolateral fusion with local bone (PLF; L4-L5 level). The rates of bone union, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), surgical invasion, and complications were evaluated before and 2 years after surgery.ResultsAge, VAS score, JOA score, and ODI were not significantly different between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05). Success of bone union between the two groups was not significantly different (P > 0.05). Blood loss during surgery was significantly less; however, periods of bed rest and hospital stay were significantly longer in the ALIF group (P < 0.05). Overall patient satisfaction, and low back and leg pain in both groups were significantly improved after surgery; however, low back pain showed greater improvement in the ALIF group compared with the PLF group (P < 0.05). Complications such as donor site pain (4 patients in the ALIF group) and dural tearing (3 patients in the PLF group) were observed.ConclusionsIf single level fusion for L4 spondylolisthesis is performed, both anterior and posterior methods reduce patients' low back and leg pain. Improvement of low back pain was significantly greater after ALIF; however, periods of hospital stay and of bed rest were significantly longer.     

Circumferential and posterolateral fusion for lumbar disc disease

Clinical outcome of low back fusion is unpredictable. There are various reports discussing the merits and clinical outcome of these two procedures. The patients were selected from a population of patients who had chronic low back pain unresponsive to conservative treatment. Thirty-six instrumented posterolateral fusions and 35 instrumented circumferential fusions with posterior lumbar interbody fusions were done simultaneously. Preoperative radiographic assessment included plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging scans, and provocative discography in all the patients. Posterolateral fusion or anterior lumbar interbody fusion was done for internal disc disruption. The Oswestry disability index, subjective scoring, and assessment of fusion were done at a minimum followup of 2 years. On subjective scoring assessment there was a satisfactory outcome of 63.9% (23 patients) in the posterolateral fusion group and 82.8% (29 patients) in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group. On assessment by the Oswestry index no difference was found in outcome between the two groups. The posterolateral fusion group had a 63.9% satisfactory outcome and the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group had an 80% satisfactory outcome using the Oswestry disability index for postoperative assessment. There was 61.1% improvement in working ability in the posterolateral fusion group and 77.1% improvement in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group which was not statistically significant. The authors consider instrumented circumferential fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion better than instrumented posterolateral fusion for managing chronic disabling low back pain.     

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral placement of a single cylindrical threaded cage

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with threaded cages was performed on 18 bovine lumbar functional spinal units. OBJECTIVES: To compare the segmental stiffness among PLIF with a single long posterolateral cage, PLIF with a single long posterolateral cage and simultaneous facet joint fixation, and PLIF with two posterior cages. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In most cases, PLIF with threaded cage techniques needs bilateral facetectomy, extensive exposure, and retraction of the cauda equina. Posterior element deficiency is detrimental to postoperative segmental stiffness. METHODS: All specimens were tested intact and with cage insertion. Group 1 (n = 12) had a long threaded cage (15 x 36 mm) inserted posterolaterally and oriented counter anterolaterally on the left side by posterior approach with left unilateral facetectomy. Group 2 (n = 6) had two regular-length cages (15 x 24 mm) inserted posteriorly with bilateral facetectomy. Six specimens from Group 1 were then retested after unilateral facet joint screw fixation in neutral (Group 3). Similarly, the other six specimens from Group 1 were retested after fixation with a facet joint screw in an extended position (Group 4). Nondestructive tests were performed in pure compression, flexion, extension, lateral bending, and torsion. RESULTS: The PLIF procedure involving a single cage (Group 1) had a significantly higher stiffness than PLIF with two cages (Group 2) in left and right torsion (P < 0.05). Group 1 had higher stiffness values than Group 2 in pure compression, flexion, and left and right bending, but differences were not significant. Group 3 had a significant increase in stiffness in comparison with Group 1 for pure compression, extension, left bending, and right torsion (P < 0.05). For Group 4, the stiffness significantly increased in comparison with Group 1 for extension, flexion, and right torsion (P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference between Groups 3 and 4, Group 4 had increased stiffness in extension, flexion, right bending, and torsion. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with a single posterolateral long threaded cage with unilateral facetectomy enabled sufficient decompression while maintaining most of the posterior elements. In combination with a facet joint screw, adequate postoperative stability was achieved.     

Analysis of the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the presence of disk degeneration, using the three-dimensional finite element method

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of lumbar spine fusion on the superior adjacent intervertebral disk in the context of disk degeneration, using a nonlinear three-dimensional finite element method. Detailed L3-L5 motion segment models of normal and degenerated intervertebral disks were developed. In fusion models, L4-L5 was fixed by either posterolateral fusion or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Various loading conditions such as compression loading, compression loading plus flexion moment loading, or compression loading plus extension moment loading were applied to study the corresponding stress. Tresca stress on the posterolateral part of intervertebral annulus fiber and von Mises stress on the vertebral endplate (the superior and inferior sides of L3 and L4) were reduced in all degenerated disk models compared with the normal disk models. The PLIF model showed an increase in the percentage change of stress on the vertebral endplate and on the intervertebral annulus fibrosus when flexion and extension moment loadings were applied. This finding suggests that surgeons should consider the risk of exacerbating degeneration of intervertebral disks by undertaking lumbar spine fusion, when degeneration is found in intervertebral disks adjacent to vertebrae requiring fusion.     

单节段腰椎退变不稳并神经根管狭窄手术治疗的初步报告

目的 探讨应用腰椎侧后方斜向单枚ＢＡＫ椎间融合器椎间融合及小关节螺钉固定术治疗单节段腰椎退变不稳并神经根和狭窄的治疗效果。方法 采用后路腰椎侧后方对神经根管彻底减压,由侧后方斜向植入单枚ＢＡＫ椎间植骨融合器,再经棘突根部向对侧未减压的小关节植入１枚小关节螺钉固定的方法,治疗单节段腰椎退变不稳并神经根管狭窄患者３０例,男３０例,女１７例,平均年龄４６．５岁;其中融合节段为Ｌ３～４者４例,Ｌ４－５者１     

Posterolateral lumbar fusion using facet joint fixation with biodegradable rods: A pilot study

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) was used to assess whether there is a potential for biodegradable rods crossing the denuded facet joints to increase the stability and healing rate of lumbar posterolateral fusions. Eleven consecutive patients with lumbosacral disc/facet joint degeneration had a posterolateral fusion augmented with 2- or 3.2-mm biodegradable rods passing perpendicularly through the center of the denuded facet joints. The patients were followed-up with RSA in supine and erect positions monthly from the 2nd to the 6th postoperative month, and again 1 year postoperatively. All seven L5-S 1 fusions healed. Four cases were stable as defined by RSA within 3 months, two within 6 months, and one within 1 year. One L4-S1 fusion could not be evaluated by RSA. None of the remaining three L4-S1 fusions fully healed. In all three cases 1- to 3-mm intervertebral translations remained at 1 year. None of the 11 fusions showed any radiographic signs of osteolysis around the biodegradable rods. The promising results of this pilot study indicate that posterolateral L5-S 1 fusion augmented with transarticular biodegradable rods crossing the denuded facet joints may yield rapid intervertebral stabilization and a high healing rate without any adverse rod effects. This may be due to enhanced initial fusion stabilization and/or increased ossification induced by the rods.