A study of motor and sensory evoked potentials in chronic cauda equina compression of the dog

Previous experimental studies have shown the effects of acute compression of the spinal cord and peripheral nerve roots. Recently, however, a few studies of chronic compression of the cauda equina in animal models have been reported. The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term electrophysiologic changes resulting from chronic compression of the cauda equina in dogs. An animal model of lumbar spinal stenosis was prepared according to Delamarter's method. Four experimental groups, each containing six dogs, were studied. One group underwent only laminectomy of the sixth and seventh lumbar vertbrae; these animals served as controls. In the three other groups, a laminectomy was performed and the cauda equina was constricted by 25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively, to produce chronic compression. Weekly neurologic examinations were carried out, and the neurologic deficits were graded using a modified Tarlov system. Sensory, and motor evoked potentials were recorded preoperatively, immediately after constriction, and at 2 weeks and 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively. The animals in the control group showed no changes in sensory or motor evoked potentials. The dogs in which the cauda equina had been constricted by 25% showed no neurologic deficits and only mild changes in sensory and motor evoked potentials. The dogs in which the cauda equina had been constricted by 50% showed mild initial motor weakness, and major changes in the evoked potentials. The dogs in which the cauda equina had been constricted by 75% showed significant weakness, paralysis of the tail, and urinary incontinence; all dogs were partially recovered by the 3rd month, but all still showed neurogenic changes in the evoked potentials. Sensory and motor evoked potentials revealed neurologic abnormalities before the appearance of neurologic signs and symptoms. Constriction of more than 50% was the critical point that resulted in complete loss or reduction of the evoked potentials and in neurologic deficits. Dogs in which motor and sensory evoked potentials recovered also showed gradual disappearance of neurologic symptoms and signs. Recovery of motor evoked potentials in particular was associated with complete disappearance of neurologic symptoms and signs. For accurate prognosis in cases of chronic cauda equina compression, a combined diagnostic study of sensory and motor evoked potentials is recommended.     

Failure of motor evoked potentials to predict neurologic outcome in experimental thoracic aortic occlusion

Motor evoked potential monitoring was tested as an alternative to somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in evaluating spinal cord function during thoracic aortic occlusion in dogs. Twenty-seven animals underwent 60 minutes of cross-clamping of the proximal descending thoracic aorta with (n = 18) or without (n = 9) cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Spinal cord blood flow was measured with microspheres, and neurologic outcome was evaluated at 24 hours with Tarlov's scoring system. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage improved neurologic outcome (p less than 0.05). Motor evoked potentials recorded over the lumbar spinal cord were lost in 9 of 20 dogs with ischemic cord injury and were not lost in any of the 7 dogs that were neurologically normal. Somatosensory evoked potential were lost in 19 of 20 paraplegic/paraparetic dogs and lost in 3 of 7 normal dogs (p less than 0.01). After reperfusion, motor evoked potentials returned in all nine neurologically injured dogs that lost the potentials and were still present at 24 hours. Changes in amplitude, latency, or time until loss or return of motor evoked potentials or somatosensory evoked potentials did not predict neurologic injury. Loss of somatosensory evoked potentials had a high sensitivity (95%) but had low specificity (67%) because of peripheral nerve ischemia. Loss of motor evoked potentials recorded from the spinal cord had high specificity (100%) but a low sensitivity (46%) and was therefore not a reliable predictor of neurologic injury. Return of motor evoked potentials during reperfusion did not correlate with functional recovery. Motor evoked potentials stimulated in the cortex and recorded from the spinal cord had low overall accuracy (59%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of the spinal cord

It is more than 60 years since averaged somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were devised. During this period, other evoked potentials including spinal cord evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were developed. In cases needing identification of the pathologic level of myelopathy and monitoring the function of the spinal cord, these evoked potentials are now indispensable. The combination of these evoked potentials (multimodality monitoring) has been demonstrated to be sensitive and specific for detecting intraoperative neurologic injury during spine surgery. Although there is still a low level of evidence that intraoperative evoked potentials reduce the rate of new or worsened perioperative neurologic deficits, it is recommended to monitor MEP for thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and multimodal evoked potentials including at least spinal cord evoked potentials and MEP for spine surgery, when the spinal cord is considered to be at risk.     

Spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Although monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials elicited from stimulation of lower extremity peripheral nerves has been suggested as a method for assessing neural function during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery, this technique has been reported to yield a large number of false positives. It was believed that direct stimulation of the spinal cord would eliminate some of the problems associated with peripheral evoked potentials. The present study compared in 18 patients the use of scalp recorded evoked potential following stimulation of either the posterior tibial nerve via percutaneous needles or the spinal cord via an epidural electrode previously placed fluoroscopically. In 10 patients in whom distal bypass or shunt was not used, peripheral evoked potentials totally disappeared within 5-30 min of aortic clamping. Spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials disappeared permanently in 2 patients shortly after aortic cross-clamping; 1 died shortly after the procedure, and the other awoke densely paraplegic and died the next day. When distal perfusion was maintained by shunt or bypass, the disappearance of both peripheral and spinal evoked potentials accurately predicted the neurologic outcome of 1 paralyzed patient. Loss of spinal cord stimulation evoked potentials was found to be correlated with adverse neurologic outcome. Over the period of aortic clamping a gradual decrease in mean amplitude (50% at 45 min [P less than 0.05]) and a 20% increase in mean latency time were observed. Maintenance of adequate distal perfusion may permit the use of peripheral evoked potentials in the assessment of spinal cord ischemia during aortic cross-clamping.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Evaluation of motor- and sensory-evoked potentials for spinal cord monitoring during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of spinal cord monitorings for prediction of spinal cord ischemia, we investigated the role of both motor evoked potentials and sensory evoked potentials during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgeries. METHODS: We monitored two kinds of sensory evoked potentials; descending evoked spinal cord potentials from the lumbar enlargement after cervical spinal cord stimulation and segmental evoked spinal cord potentials at the lumbar enlargement elicited by peroneal nerve stimulation, and motor evoked potentials from the lumbar enlargement elicited by direct subcranial stimulation in 9 thoracoabdomonal aortic aneurysm surgeries. RESULTS: Postoperative paraplegia occurred in one case in which the patients died during the perioperative period. One case showed transient paraparesis, but recovered following rehabilitatation. These cases showed a decrease in the amplitude of descending evoked spinal cord potentials and motor evoked potentials. CONCLUSION: The recovery of the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials and the descending evoked spinal cord potentials after declamping correlated with the neurologic outcome.     

Monitoring of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials during open reduction and internal fixation of pelvis and acetabular fractures

Monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials provides instantaneous intraoperative assessment of a patient's neurologic status. Monitoring of the sciatic nerve through motor and somatosensory evoked potentials can be used during open reduction and internal fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures. A review of 12 pelvic and acetabular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation was conducted and assessed with a combination of intraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. Results revealed intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring was 100% sensitive and 100% specific in predicting postoperative sciatic nerve deficits, whereas somatosensory evoked potentials were not accurate in predicting postoperative sciatic nerve deficits. Combined monitoring of the sciatic nerve with motor and somatosensory evoked potentials is beneficial at predicting postoperative sciatic nerve deficits during open reduction and internal fixation of pelvic and acetabular fractures.     

Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: II. Changes in electroencephalogram and evoked potentials during rewarming

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiologic studies during rewarming after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest probe the state of the brain during this critical period and may provide insight into the neurological effects of circulatory arrest and the neurologic outcome. METHODS: Electroencephalogram (EEG) and evoked potentials were monitored during rewarming in 109 patients undergoing aortic surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest. RESULTS: The sequence of neurophysiologic events during rewarming did not mirror the events during cooling. The evoked potentials recovered first followed by EEG burst-suppression and then continuous EEG. The time to recovery of the evoked potentials N20-P22 complex was significantly correlated with the time of circulatory arrest even in patients without postoperative neurologic deficits (r = 0.37, (p = 0.002). The nasopharyngeal temperatures at which continuous EEG activity and the N20-P22 complex returned were strongly correlated (r = 0.44, p = 0.0002; r = 0.41, p = 0.00003) with postoperative neurologic impairment. Specifically, the relative risk for postoperative neurologic impairment increased by a factor of 1.56 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.2) for every degree increase in temperature at which the EEG first became continuous. CONCLUSIONS: No trend toward shortened recovery times or improved neurologic outcome was noted with lower temperatures at circulatory arrest, indicating that the process of cooling to electrocerebral silence produced a relatively uniform degree of cerebral protection, independent of the actual nasopharyngeal temperature.     

Cortical evoked potential monitoring. A system for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function

This report describes the intraoperative use of a somatosensory cortical evoked potential system to monitor spinal cord function during 300 orthopedic surgical procedures. This system requires sophisticated equipment and the establishment of normative data but has performed well with no false negatives noted. The most frequent technical problem encountered was the effect of medications and anesthetic agents, some of which impair the evoked response significantly. In this series of 300 cases, three neurologic deficits were documented intraoperatively and confirmed postoperatively. There were four cases in which changes in evoked potentials led to change in operative procedure, with no subsequent neurologic deficit. In the remaining cases, the monitoring indicated no neurologic problems during surgery, and none were noted postoperatively.     

Spinal cord monitoring in patients with nonidiopathic spinal deformities using somatosensory evoked potentials.

Seventy-nine somatosensory evoked potentials were intraoperatively recorded in 52 patients undergoing spinal surgery for nonidiopathic spinal deformities. There were 37 true-negative, 28 true-positive (a significant change in the somatosensory evoked potential related to the surgical process), and 14 false-positive (a significant change in the somatosensory evoked potential not related to a surgical event) readings. There were, however, no postoperative neurologic deficits with any of the true-positive readings and no false negatives. Spinal and subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials gave few false-positive readings. True-positive somatosensory evoked potentials occurred in 44% of the patients with neuromuscular deformities, 17% with congenital deformities, 45% with Luque instrumentation, 22% with Harrington instrumentation, and none with fusion in situ. Fifty percent of the true positives occurred while the sublaminar wires were tightened. The predictive accuracy of intraoperative spinal cord monitoring in this patient population is not high, but the sensitivity to potentially harmful surgical events is high.     

Prognostic value of evoked potentials and clinical grading in primary subarachnoid haemorrhage

Summary In a retrospective study of 64 patients suffering from primary subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), the clinical grading according to Hunt and Hess as well as the initial findings of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) and median-nerve somatosensory potentials (SEP) were correlated with each other and with disease outcome to determine the prognostic value of evoked potential testing in comparison to the initial clinical grading according to Hunt and Hess.All patients were treated in a neurological intensive care unit. Normal evoked potentials usually indicate a favourable course. Alterations of SEP and BAEP increase in parallel with the severity of clinical findings. Unilateral or bilateral loss of SEP or BAEP indicates a poor prognosis. Clinical and electrophysiological findings show a close correlation, but only BAEP provide prognostic information beyond Hunt/Hess grading.In SAH patients, clinical grading was well as evoked potentials correlate significantly with outcome. Use of both clinical and EP rating improves prognostic accuracy.     

Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. I. Relationship of aortic cross-clamp duration, changes in somatosensory evoked potentials, and incidence of neurologic dysfunction

To determine if intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials detects spinal cord ischemia, we subjected 21 dogs to aortic cross-clamping distal to the left subclavian artery. Group I animals (short-term studies, n = 6) demonstrated decay and loss of somatosensory evoked potentials at 8.5 +/- 1.1 minutes after aortic cross-clamping. During loss of somatosensory evoked potentials, significant decreases in spinal cord blood flow occurred in cord segments below T6. Significant reactive hyperemia occurred without normalization of somatosensory evoked potentials after reperfusion. Fifteen Group II animals (long-term studies) were studied to determine the relationship between duration of spinal cord ischemia (evoked potential loss) and subsequent incidence of paraplegia. Extension of aortic cross-clamping for 5 minutes after loss of somatosensory evoked potentials in six dogs resulted in no paraplegia (mean cross-clamp time 12.7 +/- 0.6 minutes). Prolongation of aortic cross-clamping for 10 minutes after evoked potential loss in nine dogs (mean cross-clamp time 17.6 +/- 0.6 minutes) resulted in a 67% (6/9) incidence of paraplegia 7 days postoperatively (p = 0.02 versus 10 minutes of aortic cross-clamping). These findings demonstrate that simple aortic cross-clamping uniformly results in spinal cord ischemia and that such ischemia is detectable by monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials. Duration of ischemia, as measured by the time of evoked potential loss during the cross-clamp interval, is related to the incidence of postoperative neurologic injury.     

Reappraisal of the role of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during open distal aortic repair

ObjectiveIntraoperative motor and somatosensory evoked potentials have been applied to monitor spinal cord ischemia during repair. However, their predictive values remain controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on spinal cord ischemia during open distal aortic repair.MethodsOur group began routine use of both somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials at the end of 2004. This study used a historical cohort design, using risk factor and outcome data from our department's prospective registry. Univariate and multivariable statistics for risk-adjusted effects of motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials on neurologic outcome and model discrimination were assessed with receiver operating characteristic curves.ResultsBoth somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials were measured in 822 patients undergoing open distal aortic repair between December 2004 and December 2019. Both motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials were intact for the duration of surgery in 348 patients (42%). Isolated motor evoked potential loss was observed in 283 patients (34%), isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss was observed in 18 patients (3%), and both motor evoked potential and somatosensory evoked potential loss were observed in 173 patients (21%). No spinal cord ischemia occurred in the 18 cases with isolated somatosensory evoked potential loss. When both signals were lost, signal loss happened in the order of motor evoked potentials and then somatosensory evoked potentials. Immediate spinal cord ischemia occurred in none of those without signal loss, 4 of 283 (1%) with isolated motor evoked potential loss, and 15 of 173 (9%) with motor evoked potential plus somatosensory evoked potential loss. Delayed spinal cord ischemia occurred in 12 of 348 patients (3%) with intact evoked potentials, 24 of 283 patients (8%) with isolated motor evoked potentials loss, and 27 of 173 patients (15%) with motor evoked potentials + somatosensory evoked potentials loss (P < .001). Motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials loss were each independently associated with spinal cord ischemia. For immediate spinal cord ischemia, no return of motor evoked potential signals at the conclusion of the surgery had the highest odds ratio of 15.87, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.936, whereas motor evoked potential loss had the highest odds ratio of 3.72 with an area under the curve of 0.638 for delayed spinal cord ischemia.ConclusionsSomatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potentials are both important monitoring measures to predict and prevent spinal cord ischemia during and after open distal aortic repairs. Intraoperative motor evoked potential loss is a risk for immediate and delayed spinal cord ischemia after open distal aortic repair, and somatosensory evoked potential loss further adds predictive value to the motor evoked potential.     

Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the thoracoabdominal aorta. IV. Clinical observations and results

Thirty-three patients undergoing operations on the descending thoracic or thoracoabdominal aorta were monitored to evaluate causes and effects of spinal cord ischemia as manifested by changes in somatosensory evoked potentials. Maintenance of distal aortic perfusion pressure (greater than 60 mm Hg) by either shunt or bypass techniques in 17 patients resulted in preservation of somatosensory evoked potentials and a normal postoperative neurologic status, irrespective of the interval of thoracic cross-clamping (range 23 to 105 minutes). In 16 other patients in whom cross-clamp time ranged from 16 to 124 minutes, evoked potential loss was observed because of failure to provide distal perfusion (n = 8), inadequate maintenance of distal perfusion pressure (less than 60 mm Hg) despite shunt/bypass (n = 6), or interruption of critical intercostal arteries (n = 2). Incidence of paraplegia in the entire group was 15.1% (5/33) and was limited to only those patients in whom evoked potential loss occurred (5/16, 31.2%) (p = 0.02). Loss of somatosensory evoked potentials for more than 30 minutes resulted in a 71.2% (5/7) incidence of paraplegia, whereas no neurologic deficit was noted in patients (0/26) in whom evoked potential loss was either prevented or limited in duration to 30 minutes (p less than 0.001 versus loss for more than 30 minutes). Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials is a sensitive indicator of spinal cord ischemia. Simple aortic cross-clamping, failure to maintain distal perfusion pressure above 60 mm Hg, and inability to reimplant critical intercostals in a timely fashion result in a high rate of paraplegia if duration of spinal cord ischemia as measured by somatosensory evoked potentials exceeds 30 minutes. Routine evoked potential monitoring during thoracoabdominal procedures appears useful in assessing the adequacy of spinal cord perfusion. Furthermore, it can alert the surgeon to the necessity for critical intercostal artery reimplantation as well as the need for adjustment or regulation of distal aortic perfusion.     

Neural correlates of hysterical blindness

The neural mechanisms underlying conversion disorders such as hysterical blindness are at present unknown. Typically, patients are diagnosed through exclusion of neurological disease and the absence of pathologic neurophysiological diagnostic findings. Here, we investigate the neural basis of this disorder by combining electrophysiological (event-related potentials) and hemodynamic measures (functional magnet resonance tomography) in a patient with hysterical blindness before and after successful treatment. Importantly, the blindness was limited to the left upper and right lower visual quadrant offering the possibility to use the other 2 sighted quadrants as controls. While the functional magnetic resonance imaging activations were normal for visual stimulation electrophysiological indices of visual processing were modulated in a specific manner. Before treatment, the amplitude of the N1 event-related potentials component had smaller amplitudes for stimuli presented in the blind quadrants of the visual field. Following successful treatment the N1 component elicited by stimuli presented in formerly blind quadrants had a normal distribution without any amplitude differences between the 4 quadrants. The current findings point out that dissociative disorders such as hysterical blindness may have neurophysiological correlates. Furthermore, the observed neurophysiological pattern suggests an involvement of attentional mechanisms in the neural basis hysterical blindness.     

脊髓损伤后早期减压对诱发电位影响的实验研究

[目的]观察脊髓损伤后早期减压对体感诱发电位及经颅磁刺激运动诱发电位的影响，以探讨诱发电位在判断手术时机及预后中的应用价值。[方法]日本大耳兔32只随机分4组。A组为对照组，不造成脊髓损伤。B、C、D组为脊髓损伤组。对每组动物于不同时间分别检测SEP、MEP。分析波形的潜伏期、峰问波幅。用后肢的Tarlov分级法作伤后运动功能评分。取脊髓标本，行组织学观察。[结果]随着脊髓压迫时间的延长，SEP、MEP的潜伏期逐渐延长，波幅逐渐减小．波幅变化较潜伏期更为敏感。在恢复过程中，脊髓受压时间越短，诱发电位恢复越早。潜伏期恢复早于波幅，而且SEP恢复早于MEP，MEP的恢复早于功能评分。[结论]SEP与TMS-MEP对脊髓损伤十分敏感，能较早反映脊髓损伤程度，可用于指导临床手术治疗和判断预后。     

Loss of SSEP during sitting craniotomy

A 54-year-old woman with a past medical history of asthma and depression presented with right side hearing loss and ataxia. She was scheduled for a sitting craniotomy for cerebellopontine angle tumor resection. Somatosensory evoked potential, brainstem auditory evoked response, and facial nerve EMG were monitored intraoperatively. Approximately 30 minutes into the case, there was an episode of air embolism, which resolved after the source was identified and treated. Near the conclusion of the case, there was an abrupt loss of the right cortical somatosensory evoked potential signal, which never returned to baseline. A postoperative CT scan showed a substantial amount of subarachnoid air and intraventricular air in the frontal and temporal regions. The patient awakened in the ICU with no new neurologic deficit besides preoperative hearing loss on the right side. Despite the high specificity of somatosensory evoked potential change associated with postoperative neurodeficit when the change never returns to the baseline, there was no postoperative neurologic deficit in this patient. This case indicates the false-positive somatosensory evoked potentials caused by pneumocephalus in the sitting position.     

Neurophysiologic monitoring in neurosurgery

This article focuses on the application of neurophysiologic monitoring in uniquely neurosurgical procedures. Neurophysiologic monitoring provides functional testing and mapping to identify neural structures. Once identified, the functionality of the central and peripheral nervous system areas at risk for neurosurgical injury can be monitored. It discusses the use of motor-evoked potentials, sensory evoked potentials, electromyography and electroencephalography to assess neurologic change.     

Hypothermic retrograde venous perfusion with adenosine cools the spinal cord and reduces the risk of paraplegia after thoracic aortic clamping

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the utility of retrograde venous perfusion to cool the spinal cord and protect neurologic function during aortic clamping. We hypothesized that hypothermic adenosine would preserve the spinal cord during ischemia. METHODS: Six swine (group I) underwent thoracic aortic occlusion for 30 minutes at normothermia. Group II animals underwent spinal cooling by retrograde perfusion of the paravertebral veins with hypothermic (4 degrees C) saline solution during aortic occlusion. The spinal cords of group III animals were cooled with a hypothermic adenosine solution in a similar fashion. Intrathecal temperature was monitored and somatosensory evoked potentials assessed the functional status of spinal pathways. RESULTS: Spinal cooling without systemic hypothermia significantly improved neurologic Tarlov scores in group III (4.8 +/- 0.2) and group II (3.8 +/- 0.4) when compared with group I scores (1.3 +/- 0.6) (P <.001). Furthermore, 5 of the 6 animals in group III displayed completely normal neurologic function, whereas only one animal in group II and no animals in group I did (P =.005). Somatosensory evoked potentials were lost 10.6 +/- 1.4 minutes after ischemia in group I. In contrast, spinal cooling caused rapid cessation of neural transmission with loss of somatosensory evoked potentials at 6.9 +/- 1.2 minutes in group II and 7.0 +/- 0.8 minutes in group III (P =.06). Somatosensory evoked potential amplitudes returned to 85% of baseline in group III and 90% of baseline in group II compared with only 10% of baseline in group I (P =.01). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that retrograde cooling of the spinal cord is possible and protects against ischemic injury and that adenosine enhances this effect. The efficacy of this method may be at least partly attributed to a more rapid reduction in metabolic and electrical activity of the spinal cord during ischemia.     

Strategies for managing decreased motor evoked potential signals while distracting the spine during correction of scoliosis

Surgical correction of kyphoscoliosis may result in spinal cord injury and neurologic deficits. Monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) intraoperatively may allow for early detection and reversal of spinal cord injury. Controlled hypotension and isovolemic hemodilution are often used during these cases to reduce blood loss and transfusion. However, these physiologic parameters may affect the quality of SSEP and MEP signals. Acute reduction or loss of MEP or SSEP signals during spinal distraction presents a crisis for the operative team: should distraction be immediately relieved? The authors describe three patients who showed a decrease in evoked potential signals under hypotensive, hemodiluted conditions at the stage of spinal distraction. Each case illustrates a different strategy for successful management of these patients.     

Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) were recorded from the scalp for intraoperative monitoring of patients undergoing surgical correction of spine deformities or spine fractures. Alterations in the SSEP with distraction, spine manipulation, anesthesia, hypotension, and other intraoperative variables are described. When loss of the SSEP occurred and a waiting period was undertaken until it returned, all patients with an SSEP present upon closing, which was within +/- 2 SD of their anesthetized control values, had no neurologic complications. Alterations in SSEP consisting of increases in latency of 15% and decreases in amplitude of 50% were not associated with any postoperative neurologic deficits.