Comparison between peak expiratory flow rate and forced expiratory volume in one second in the evaluation of children suspected to have asthma

This study was conducted to evaluate whether forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) for the diagnosis of bronchial reactivity by means of the free-running exercise test and bronchodilator inhalation, could be appropriately replaced by simple measurements of peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) in children.We studied 108 referred symptomatic children (due to chronic cough or wheezing) suspected to have asthma aged 5-14y. Forced breathing spirometry and the "Mini-Wright peak flow meter" tests were recorded before and fifteen minutes after the challenge with free- running exercise or bronchodilator (Salbutamol) inhalation, regarding the baseline FEV1 value (FEV1> 80% considered as normal).There was a high correlation between PEFR and FEV1 (in absolute value and percent predicted) measured before and after bronchodilator inhalation test (r = 0.48, P = 0.05) in comparison to the values referred to free- running exercise test (r = 0.26, P = 0.01)."forced breathing spirometry" and "Mini-Wright peak flow" cannot be used interchangeably for diagnosing asthma, and PEFR measurement should remain a procedure for monitoring and following up the patients.     

Predictive nomograms for forced expiratory volume, forced vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow rate, in Chinese adults and children

A survey of three indices of ventilatory capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), was undertaken on 3490 Chinese inhabitants of Hong Kong. Nomograms have been constructed for the prediction of these three indices for subjects between the ages of 5 and 75 years.     

Predicting arterial oxygen tension from maximum expiratory flow volume curves in cystic fibrosis

Measurements of arterial oxygen tension (PaO2) while breathing room air, and maximum expiratory flow volume curves were performed in 34 patients with cystic fibrosis (age range 7-27 years, 24 males and 10 females). Logistic regression was performed using forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and forced expiratory flow at 75% of expired vital capacity (FEF75) to model an equation for predicting when PaO2 would be less than 55 mmHg (severe hypoxemia). Equations were modelled using one, two, three, or all four of the variables. For the univariate logistic regression, each of the four variables was a significant (P less than 0.001) predictor for severe hypoxemia. FVC was the best predictor with an R2 = 0.56, sensitivity of 100% (false negative rate = 0%), and a specificity of 88.5% (false positive rate = 27%). The model predicted that patients with an FVC less than 35% of the predicted normal were at risk of having PaO2 less than or equal to 55 mmHg. Adding FEV1, FEF75, or PEFR in various combinations to FVC made the model equation more complicated but did not add significantly to the ability to predict severe hypoxemia.     

A comparison of a new transtelephonic portable spirometer with a laboratory spirometer.

The Spirophone is a new, portable transtelephonic spirometer which records the slow and the forced expiratory vital capacity tests. Data can be transmitted via the telephone to a remote receiving centre, where a volume-time curve and the flow-volume curve are displayed on screen in real time. The aim of this study was to compare the newly developed transtelephonic spirometer, with a laboratory spirometer according to the American Thoracic Society (ATS) testing guidelines. Spirometry indices (slow vital capacity (SVC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory flow at 25, 50 and 75% of FVC (FEF25, FEF50, and FEF75, respectively)) were measured from the SVC and the FVC tests in 45 subjects (30 patients, 15 healthy volunteers) according to the ATS standards. The data obtained with the laboratory system were compared to those from the Spirophone. The Spirophone measurements of SVC, FVC, FEV1, PEF, FEF25, FEF50 and FEF75 correlated closely (r=0.91-0.98) to those from the laboratory system, whereas FEF25, FEF50, and FEF75 were significantly higher with the Spirophone. It is concluded that the Spirophone is comparable to the standard spirometry for home monitoring of slow vital capacity, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in one second and peak expiratory flow. The validity of the manoeuvre can be assessed on screen in real time.     

Effect of effort on measurement of forced expiratory volume in one second

The American Thoracic Society recommends that the largest FEV1 be reported from a set of forced expiratory vital capacity maneuvers performed with maximal expiratory effort. However, increased expiratory effort can decrease the FEV1. When we evaluated the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) in 5 normal subjects, measured from flow-volume curves, as a noninvasive index of expiratory effort, it was positively correlated with indices of effort obtained by using an esophageal balloon. We then measured the difference (dFEV1)between the largest FEV1 and FEV1 from the maneuver with the highest PEFR during 10 test sessions in 10 normal subjects. Thus, dFEV1 was always greater than or equal to 0. The mean dFEV1 was 110 ml for all sessions but decreased to 80 ml when maneuvers with poorly reproducible PEFR or forced expiratory vital capacity values were discarded. We also reviewed 9.471 spirometry sessions from outpatients and found dFEV1 to be greater than 50 ml in 26% of this population and greater than 151 ml in 7%. We concluded that during standard spirometry, FEV1 is inversely dependent on effort. Maximal effort decreases FEV1 because of the effect of thoracic gas compression on lung volume. We recommend that values from spirometry maneuvers that demonstrate submaximal effort, indicated by a decreased PEFR, be discarded. The flow-volume curve display of superimposed efforts facilitates the recognition of submaximal efforts.     

Comparison of PEFR and FEV1 in patients with varying degrees of airway obstruction. Effect of modest altitude

Measurements of FEV1 and PEFR performed on a Jones Pulmonor Spirometer (JPF) were compared with PEFR obtained with a mini-Wright peak flow meter (WPF) in 102 patients. Data were converted to percent predicted. Standard deviations of triplicate measurements were: FEV1, 3.01 percent; JPF, 7.22 percent; and WPF, 5.12 percent. Correlation of best of three measurements was FEV1-JPF r = .758; FEV1-WPF r = .744; and JPF-WPF r = .846. The mean percent predicted of the best of three values of FEV1 was 74.8 percent, JPF 91.4 percent, and WPF 94 percent. These higher values for percent predicted PEFR were obtained throughout the range of FEV1 values. Studies on nine normal volunteers in an atmospheric chamber suggested that higher altitudes may account for higher PEFR values. We conclude that PEFR, measured by either waterless spirometer or mini-Wright peak flow meter, has greater intrasubject variability than FEV1, and it tends to underestimate the degree of pulmonary impairment.     

Importance of smoking index for assessing lung damage by lung function tests

A total of 89 smokers of age varying between 15-52 years were assessed for lung function forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ratio of FEV1 and FVC as FEV1% and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), before smoking (BS) and 30 min after smoking (AS). All the above lung function tests were reduced in smokers in comparison to those of age-matched non-smokers. Further, when observed test values of lung function were tabulated according to smoking index (SI), it was noted that reduction of lung function increased with SI.     

Advantages of late expiratory relaxation during maximal forced expiratory maneuver

A modification of the maneuver for the maximal expiratory flow volume (MEFV) curve was described recently to improve the rate of achieving the acceptability criteria of the American Thoracic Society. The maneuver allows the subject to relax in the later part of expiration. The present study was carried out to determine if the modified spirometry technique offered any advantages over the standard FVC maneuver in asthma patients with a wide range of airways obstruction. MEFV curves were obtained in seventy-two subjects with standard and modified procedures in a randomized, crossover design. The patients were divided into four groups depending on the degree of airways obstruction-normal spirometry, mild, moderate and severe airways obstruction. The spirometric parameters (FVC, FEV1, FEV/FVC ratio, FET, PEFR and F25-75) were compared in each group. The modified technique gave a higher FVC measurement especially in patients with moderate and severe airways obstruction along with increased FET. PEFR and FEV1 were not different between the techniques. FEV1/FVC ratio was significantly decreased in patients with moderate and severe airways obstruction. Both the techniques gave equally acceptable and reproducible results with similar variability for FEV1 and FVC. It was concluded that the modification of the standard FVC maneuver by allowing the subject to relax in the later part of expiration is advantageous as it yields a lower FEV1/FVC ratio without affecting the FEV1, has the same within-session variability and is less strenuous.     

Should forced expiratory volume in six seconds replace forced vital capacity to detect airway obstruction?

It has been suggested that forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV(6)) should be substituted for forced vital capacity (FVC) to measure fractions of timed expired volume for airflow obstruction detection. The present authors hypothesised that this recommendation might be questionable because flow after 6 s of forced expiration from more diseased lung units with the longest time constants was most meaningful and should not be ignored. Furthermore, previous studies comparing FEV(6) and FVC included few subjects with mild or no disease. The present study used spirometric data from the USA Third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey with prior published ethnicity- and sex-specific equations for FEV(1)/FEV(6), FEV(1)/FVC and FEV(3)/FVC, and new equations for FEV(3)/FEV(6), all derived from approximately 4,000 adult never-smokers aged 20-80 yrs. At 95% confidence intervals, 21.3% of 3,515 smokers and 41.3% of smokers aged >51 yrs had airway obstruction; when comparing FEV(1)/FEV(6) with FEV(1)/FVC, 13.5% were concurrently abnormal, 1.5% were false positives and 4.1% were false negatives; and when comparing FEV(3)/FEV(6) with FEV(3)/FVC, 11.6% were concurrently abnormal, 3.3% were false positives and 5.7% were false negatives. Substituting forced expiratory volume in six seconds for forced vital capacity to determine the fractional rates of exhaled volumes reduces the sensitivity of spirometry to detect airflow obstruction, especially in older individuals and those with lesser obstruction.     

Can peak expiratory flow be measured accurately during a forced vital capacity manoeuvre?

Spirometry and peak flow measurements traditionally depend on different forced expiratory manoeuvres and have usually been performed on separate, dedicated equipment. As spirometry becomes more widely used in primary care settings, the authors wished to determine whether there was a systematic difference between peak expiratory flow (PEF) derived from a short sharp exhalation (PEF manoeuvre) and from a full forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvre, using the same turbine spirometer (Microloop, Micro Medical, Kent, UK). Eighty children (38 with current asthma) aged 7-16 yrs were asked to perform 2 blocks of PEF and FVC manoeuvres, the order being randomly assigned. PEF obtained from a peak flow manoeuvre (PEFPF) was significantly greater than that from a forced vital capacity manoeuvre (PEFVC) in both healthy (group mean difference 20 L x min(-1); p<0.001) and asthmatic children (group mean difference 9 L.min(-1); p<0.004). For clinical purposes, a mean difference of about 3% for children with asthma is of no practical significance, and peak expiratory flow data can usefully be obtained during spirometric recordings.     

Accuracy, precision and linearity of the portable flow-volume meter Microspiro HI-298

The accuracy, precision and linearity of a new portable flow-volume meter, the Microspiro HI-298 (Chest Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), was investigated using a Fleisch no. 4 pneumotachograph as a standard. After connection and calibration of the pneumotachograph and the Microspiro, a healthy subject performed 44 forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvres at different levels of lung inflation. The FVC of these expirations ranged from 2.5-5.1 l. Linear regression of Microspiro values (dependent variable) on Fleisch pneumotachograph values (independent variable) showed that a good linear relationship existed: Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from 0.938-0.985. Linearity of the Microspiro was good except for the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and the maximal expiratory flow at 25% of the expired volume (MEF75). The random error (measure of precision) of all flow-volume (F-V) indices was lower than 5%. The systematic error (measure of accuracy) was low for the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the FVC (1% and 4.6%, respectively) but much higher for the instantaneous expiratory flows (PEFR 11.0%; MEF75 7.0%; MEF50 8.5%; MEF25 11.4%). Only the total error in FEV1 complied with the tolerance of 4% of the European Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS). When the measured values were adjusted according to the regression equations of this study, all F-V indices were accurate and precise within 5%. It was concluded that the portable Microspiro HI-298 is a useful instrument for bedside, work-site spirometry and for use in general practice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Changes in forced expiratory volume in one second and peak expiratory flow rate across a work shift among unexposed blue collar workers

Pre- and postshift spirometry was obtained on 1,113 blue collar workers employed at 35 work sites judged to have no hazardous occupational respiratory exposures on the basis of inspection visits and environmental sampling. In addition to spirometry, a standardized questionnaire was administered by trained personnel. A study population of 944 remained after exclusion of workers for incomplete demographic data and/or spirometry with poor within-session reproducibility, i.e., greater than or equal to 10% variability in the two largest values of either FVC and/or FEV1. Overall mean values of changes across the work shift in FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were -0.8% (-0.04 L) and +2.1% (+0.13 L/s), respectively. Standard deviations for these across-shift changes were 5.8% (0.19 L) and 13.2% (1.19 L/s) for FEV1 and PEFR, respectively. In univariate analyses, mean values of across-shift changes were not statistically related to age, race, sex, smoking status, work shift, or FEV1/FVC ratio. However, variability (i.e., standard deviation) of across-shift changes were significantly related to some of these factors. These observations provide a basis for interpreting results of occupational respiratory morbidity surveys involving measurement of changes in FEV1 and/or PEFR across a work shift.     

Comparison of maximal midexpiratory flow rate and forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity in children

BACKGROUND: The mid-portion of the maximal expiratory flow-volume (MEFV) curve is often described by values of the mean forced expired flow as lung volume decreases from 75% to 25% of vital capacity (ie, forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase [FEF(25-75)]). It is common practice to report also forced expired flow at 50% of vital capacity (FEF(50)). STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether FEF(50) and FEF(25-75) are highly correlated or whether the difference between them reflects a degree of airways obstruction. Also, we wanted to investigate the correlation between the two in cases of irregularly shaped MEFV curves (ie, "saw-toothing"). DESIGN: Analysis of the correlation between FEF(50) and FEF(25-75) in a single determination. We assessed the relationship between the FEF(50)/FEF(25-75) ratio and the degree of airways obstruction, as reflected by other traditional parameters such as FEV(1), FEV(1)/FVC ratio, and specific airway conductance (SGaw). PATIENTS: There were 1,350 forced expiratory maneuvers performed by children with a broad range of pulmonary abnormalities. RESULTS: FEF(50) correlated with FEF(25-75) as follows: FEF(50) (L/s) = 0.041 + 1.136*FEF(25-75)(L/s); r(2) = 0.956; standard error of the estimate = 0.013; p < 0.0001. The FEF(50)/FEF(25-75) ratio remained stable and did not correlate with FEV(1) (r = 0.12), FEV(1)/FVC ratio (r = 0.11), or SGaw (r = 0.02; difference not significant). The correlation between FEF(25-75) and FEF(50) was similar for both the smooth curve (r = 0.97) and the irregular curve (r = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Although not identical, FEF(25-75) and FEF(50) are highly correlated, and the ratio of the two is fairly constant. Therefore, the practice of reporting both of them is unnecessary. We suggest that it is reasonable to prefer FEF(50).     

Clinical comparison of two electronic spirometers with a water-sealed spirometer.

Two electronic spirometers which use a hot-wire anemometer to measure air flow were clinically compared with a water-sealed spirometer. The forced vital capacity (FVC), the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the FEV1/FVC%, the mean forced expiratory flow between 200 and 1,200 ml of the FVC, the mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC, the mean forced expiratory flow between 75 and 85 percent of the FVC, and the maximum voluntary ventilation were determined for a group of 67 subjects. Techniques are described for connecting the spirometers in series to permit evaluation by human subjects or by syringe injection. High correlation coefficients generally were obtained when comparing the electronic spirometers with the water-sealed spirometer, but the actual range of percent difference was greater than 11 percent in all spirometric tests. The results indicate the need for systematic evaluation of electronic spirometers to characterize their deviation from accented standards. Frequent calibration is necessary to maintain consistent performance.     

Performance of forced expiratory manoeuvre in children.

The negative expiratory pressure (NEP) method has been previously used to assess the performance of forced vital capacity (FVC) manoeuvre in normal adults. The aim of the present study is to assess whether flow limitation is achieved during FVC manoeuvres in children aged 6-14 yrs. NEP (-10 cmH2O) was successfully applied in 177 normal children, the portion of FVC over which expiratory flow did or did not change with NEP being taken as effort-dependent and effort-independent, respectively. In all children peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) increased with NEP, indicating that PEF was in the effort-dependent portion of FVC. This portion decreased significantly with age (50-20% of FVC from 6-14 yrs). It is suggested that this mainly reflects the poorer coordination of specialized motor acts in younger children because of incomplete morphological and functional maturation of the relevant central nervous system (CNS) mechanisms. The results indicate that most unexperienced children aged 6-14 yrs can perform acceptable forced vital capacity manoeuvres, eventually achieving flow limitation over a portion of the forced vital capacity that increases with age. The negative expiratory pressure method can be used for online assessment of the performance of forced vital capacity manoeuvres and evaluation of treatment-related effects.     

Spirometric values in Gypsy (Roma) children

Values of spirometry indices vary among subjects of similar age, gender and somatometrics but of different ethnic origins. Low socioeconomic status in childhood is inversely related to lung growth. The aim of this investigation was to assess spirometry values in Gypsy children and compare them to reported values for Caucasians. Gypsy students attending primary schools in Central Greece were recruited. Spirometry indices were measured using a portable spirometer. Regression analysis was applied to construct prediction equations for forced vital capacity (FVC) and other spirometric indices (FEV(1), FEF(50), FEF(25), FEF(25-75)) based on standing height. Predicted spirometric values were compared to values for Caucasians from published studies. In 152 children (ages 5-14 years; 57 girls) lung function increased linearly with height: spirometry index=intercept+[slopexheight], (r(2)=0.68 for FVC and FEV(1) in girls; r(2)=0.78 for FVC and r(2)=0.74 for FEV(1) in boys). Excluding boys-but not girls-in puberty increased fit for FVC (r(2)=0.83) and FEV(1) (r(2)=0.79). Mean predicted values were 5-10% lower than values for Caucasians. In Gypsy children, FVC and expiratory flow function increase linearly with standing height and predicted values are lower than those for Caucasians of similar height.     

Reference values of the provocative concentrations of methacholine that cause 6% and 20% changes in forced expiratory volume in one second in a normal population

The provocative concentrations of inhaled methacholine that cause 6% (PC6) and 20% (PC20) falls in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were assessed in a population of 100 nonsmoking persons, equally distributed for sex, who ranged uniformly from 20 to 60 yr of age. These subjects had no respiratory symptoms, rhinitis, atopic history, or familial history of asthma. Single twofold dilutions of methacholine from 2 to 128 mg/ml were used; 81 and 34 subjects, respectively, showed PC6 and PC20 values less than 128 mg/ml. Eight subjects had PC20 values less than 16 mg/ml. In these subjects, the test had a good reproducibility (r = 0.92) when we repeated it, and serial measurements of peak expiratory flow rates did not suggest asthma. The fact that PC6 was related, although loosely, to baseline FEV, FEV/FVC, and forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC (FEF) and that 4 of the 8 subjects with PC20 values less than 16 mg/ml had lower values of FEF might suggest that responsiveness to methacholine is partially linked with baseline airway caliber.     

Relationship between different measurements of respiratory function in asthma

Peak expirator flow rate (PEFR) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) were measured in 630 asthmatics at routine attendance (actual function). The highest potential PEFR and forced vital capacity (FVC) were established with corticosteroids if necessary (maximum function). Maximum function assesses the persistent component, and the ratio of actual maximum function is a measure of the potentially reversible component of obstruction relieved at attendance. Actual PEFR and FEV1 were closely related (r = 0.85), and maximum PEFR and FVC somewhat less so (r = 0.58). Mean values for actual/maximum function were similar in both sexes by both methods. Persistent obstruction and control of reversible wheeze were not closely related, particularly in long-standing asthma. In routine clinics, spirometry adds little to PEFR although in females it was more sensitive than PEFR in detecting persistent obstruction. Dissociation between control and persistent obstruction, particularly in long-standing asthma, suggests that poor control is not important in determining the development of persistent obstruction.     

Spirometry in children aged 3 to 5 years: reliability of forced expiratory maneuvers.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of forced expiratory maneuvers during standard spirometric evaluation in preschool children. Among 570 young children attending our laboratory, we retrospectively selected 355 patients (14% 3-4-year-olds, 48% 4-5-year-olds, and 38% 5-6-year-olds) who carried out spirometric tests for the first time. The indications for such tests were history of asthma (70%), followed by chronic cough (20%) and other miscellaneous conditions (10%). Eighty-eight, 175, and 92 children performed one, two, and three acceptable tests respectively. Forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) and forced vital capacity (FVC) did not differ significantly between attempts in children performing either two or three attempts. Forced expiratory time (FET), i.e., the total time required for the forced expiratory maneuver, was 1.7 +/- 0.1 sec (mean +/- SEM), and was no greater than 1 sec in 21.3% of all tested children. Consequently, FEV(1) does not appear to be well-suited to this age group. Forced expiratory volume in 0.50 and 0.75 sec (FEV(0.5), FEV(0.75)) were thus measured in the group of children performing three attempts (n = 92), and there was no statistical difference between attempts. In 267 children performing two or three tests, the ATS criteria of reproducing FEV(1) and FVC within 相似文献   

Comparison between peak expiratory flow and FEV(1) measurements on a home spirometer and on a pneumotachograph in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of electronic portable home spirometers has been demonstrated in vitro using computer-based waveforms. We assessed the agreement in vivo between measurements of lung function on an electronic spirometer (Koko Peak Pro) and those obtained by the gold standard, a hospital lung function laboratory pneumotachograph. METHODS: Fifty stable asthmatic children (33 boys), aged 6-17 years, performed peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) measurements according to international guidelines on a portable home spirometer and on the hospital pneumotachograph in random order. All measurements complied to standard quality criteria. The PEF and FEV(1) values recorded with the home spirometer and on the hospital pneumotachograph were compared. RESULTS: All children performed reproducible high-quality measurements on both spirometers. PEF values on the home spirometer were considerably lower than on the laboratory pneumotachograph (95% CI for difference in PEF 14-30 L/min; P < 0.0001). Individual differences in PEF between the two devices could be >100 L/min. The FEV(1) values were slightly, but significantly, lower on the home spirometer (95% CI for difference in FEV(1) 0.02-0.1 L; P = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: A home spirometer provides reproducible and quality acceptable measures in children with asthma when performed under professional supervision and encouragement. Mean PEF and FEV(1) values recorded on this home spirometer are significantly lower than those on a hospital pneumotachograph, and individual differences may be large. Therefore, home spirometry may not be interchanged with pneumotachography in a lung function laboratory.