Associations between UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*6/*28 polymorphisms and irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients

Purpose

Neutropenia is a life-threatening side effect of irinotecan, and uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) gene polymorphisms are considered to be one of the predictive markers of irinotecan-related toxicities. Many studies have demonstrated that patients bearing UGT1A1*28 have a higher risk of severe neutropenia on toxicity of irinotecan. However, UGT1A1 (TA7/TA7) was very rare in Asian populations. Some researches reported that UGT1A1*28 and/or UGT1A1*6 could predict irinotecan-induced toxicities in Asian populations, but controversial conclusions still remained. This study aims to investigate the association between UGT1A1 gene polymorphisms *6, *6/*28 and irinotecan-related neutropenia in Asian cancer patients receiving irinotecan regimen chemotherapy.

Experimental design

Meta-analyses were done to assess the relationship between UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*6/*28 and irinotecan-induced neutropenia.

Results

The risk of neutropenia was significantly higher among patients with a UGT1A1*6 genotype than among those carrying the UGT1A1*1 allele(s) [odds ratio (OR) 3.276; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.887–5.688; P = 0.000 (*6/*6 vs. *1/*6 or *1/*1)], [OR 1.542; 95 % CI 1.180–2.041; P = 0.001 (*6/*6 or *1/*6 vs. *1/*1)]. Also, the risk was significantly higher among patients with a UGT1A1*6/*28 than among those carrying the UGT1A1*1 allele(s) [OR 3.275; 95 % CI 2.152–4.983; P = 0.000 (*6/*6 or *28/*28 or *6/*28 vs. *1/*6 or *1/*28 or *1/*1)].

Conclusions

In conclusion, the UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*6/*28 genotypes were associated with an increased risk of irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients.     

CPT-11 as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic gastric cancer who failed S-1 (CCOG0702)

Background

In Japan, CPT-11 is often used to treat unresectable gastric cancer in the second-line setting. However, evidence regarding benefit of second-line chemotherapy remains sparse, especially after failing S-1.

Methods

A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly administration of CPT-11 at a dose of 100 mg/m² after failing a S-1-containing first-line treatment was planned with response rate as a primary end point. UGT1A1*6, *27, and *28 genotyping were performed in all cases, and those found to have either homozygous for *28, homozygous for *6, heterozygous for both *6 and *28, and heterozygous for *27 were rendered ineligible for the phase II trial.

Results

Two patients of homozygous for *28, two patients of homozygous for *6, and one patient of heterozygous for *27 were found among 39 recruited patients. The median number of courses delivered was 3 courses. The overall response rate was 15.4 % and disease control rate was 65.4 %. The median time to treatment failure was 87.5 days and median overall survival was 268 days. Twenty-two (73 %) of 30 valuable patients experienced protocol-specified skip of treatment and 8 (30 %) of patients could continue treatment with dose reduction. ≥G3 neutropenia was found in 30 % and ≥G3 anorexia and diarrhea were found in 23 and 17 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Weekly CPT-11 at 100 mg/m² showed moderate response among gastric cancer patients who were refractory to S-1, but the disease control rate seemed meaningful. Even after selection of patients by UGT1A1 polymorphism of *6, *27, and *28, severe toxic events could not be prevented completely.     

The value of genetic polymorphisms to predict toxicity in metastatic colorectal patients with irinotecan-based regimens

Purpose

We are trying to identify predictive factors of high risk of toxicity by analyzing candidate genes in the irinotecan pathways in order to identify useful tools to improve mCRC patient management under real practice conditions.

Methods

Genomic DNA was genotyped for UGT1A1 (*28, *60 and *93) from all 101 patients, and irinotecan dose was 180 mg/m² every second week. Clinical data were obtained by retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint is to find out whether the pharmacogenetic test in the clinical practice may predict toxicity.

Results

Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred in twelve patients and required dose reduction in six patients, and neutropenia reached grade 3/4 in 19 patients (only one patient with *28/*28 genotype). The UGT1A1*93 seemed to relate with grade 3/4 neutropenia but only in the heterozygote state (G/A), p = 0.071, and UGT1A*60 showed no association with neutropenia. Twenty-eight percentage of patients required the use of G-CSF; 64.3 % of them harbored *1/*28 or *28/*28 genotypes, p = 0.003. Thirty-seven (36.6 %) patients required dose reduction of irinotecan and/or 5-FU owing to toxicity, mainly neutropenia and diarrhea. No significant association was detected between *28, *60 and *93 UGT1A variants and severe irinotecan-associated hematologic or GI toxicity.

Conclusion

The impact of increased risk of toxicity attributed to the UGT1A variants may be offset by irinotecan in clinical practice by dose reduction or the use of colony-stimulating factor.     

Usefulness of one-point plasma SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratios as a substitute for UGT1A1 genetic information after irinotecan administration

Background

It was recently reported that genetic polymorphisms of UDP glucuronyltransferase-1 polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1), a glucuronidation enzyme, were associated with irinotecan (CPT-11) metabolism. The active metabolite of CPT-11, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) was glucuronidated (SN-38G) by UGT1A1. Genetic polymorphisms of UGT1A1 were associated with potentially serious adverse events, including neutropenia. Several studies have suggested that the dose of CPT-11 should be decreased in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28, or double heterozygotes (*6/*28). However, the reference dose for patients with these genetic polymorphisms is unclear.

Methods

We investigated the relationship between the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio and the dose of CPT-11 in 70 patients with colorectal cancer who received FOLFIRI-based regimens, by measuring the plasma concentrations of CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G.

Results

The SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio was lower in patients who were homozygous for UGT1A1*6, heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28, or were double heterozygotes compared with patients with wild-type genes. The relative decreases in the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 and in double heterozygotes were greater than in patients heterozygous for UGT1A1*6 or UGT1A1*28. Interestingly, decreases in the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio were associated with decreases in the neutrophil count and the final infusion dose of CPT-11.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio is an important factor for guiding dose adjustments, even in patients with wild-type genes. Therefore, the SN-38G/SN-38 concentration ratio, as an index of the patient’s metabolic capacity, is useful for assessing dose adjustments of CPT-11.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1*6</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">*28</Emphasis> polymorphisms as indicators of initial dose level of irinotecan to reduce risk of neutropenia in patients receiving FOLFIRI for colorectal cancer

Background

Irinotecan (CPT-11)-induced neutropenia is associated with UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*6 and *28 polymorphisms. This prospective study investigated whether using these polymorphisms to adjust the initial dose of CPT-11 as part of FOLFIRI treatment in colorectal cancer patients might improve safety.

Methods

All data were collected by a physician. The relationship between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and first-cycle neutropenia, reasons for treatment discontinuation, and time-to-treatment failure were evaluated. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the risk of neutropenia.

Results

A total of 795 patients were divided into wild-type (*1/*1) (50.1 %), heterozygous (*28/*1, *6/*1) (41.1 %), and homozygous (*28/*28, *6/*6, *28/*6) (8.which are associated with a decrease in the8 %) groups, in which the median starting dose of CPT-11 was 143.0, 143.0, and 115.0 mg/m², respectively. First-cycle grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 17.3, 25.4, and 28.6 % of these patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the incidence of grade ≥3 neutropenia was significantly greater in the heterozygous and homozygous groups than in the wild-type group [odds ratio (OR) 1.67; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.16–2.42; p = 0.0060, and OR 2.22; 95 % CI 1.22–4.02; p = 0.0088, respectively]. Age (OR 1.77; 95 % CI 1.24–2.53; p = 0.0017), coelomic fluid (OR 1.84; 95 % CI 1.05–3.25; p = 0.0343), and non-reduction in starting dose (OR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.08–2.18; p = 0.0176) were also identified as significant risk factors.

Conclusion

The risk of neutropenia was higher in the heterozygous and homozygous groups at initiation of CPT-11 treatment. This suggests that when a reduction in dose is required in patients harboring two variant alleles, the decrease should be approximately 20 %.

     

Uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1 family polypeptide A1 gene (UGT1A1) polymorphisms are associated with toxicity and efficacy in irinotecan monotherapy for refractory pancreatic cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC).

Methods

Patients with APC refractory to gemcitabine and S-1 were included. Irinotecan (100 mg/m²) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The relationship between uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferase 1 family polypeptide A1 gene (UGT1A1) polymorphisms and clinical outcomes was evaluated.

Results

Between January 2007 and December 2011, 231 cycles were delivered in 56 patients. Irinotecan was administered as second-line chemotherapy in 35.7 % of patients and as third-line chemotherapy or later in 64.3 %. A partial response was achieved in two (3.6 %) and stable disease in 23 patients (41.0 %), giving a disease control rate of 44.6 %. The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 2.9 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.8–3.5) months and 5.3 (95 % CI 4.5–6.8) months, respectively. Median survival from the first-line chemotherapy was 19.5 (95 % CI 15.3–23.8) months. Major grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (28.6 %), anemia (12.5 %), and anorexia (10.7 %). Patients with *6 and/or *28 allele(s) (n = 15) were associated with grade 3/4 neutropenia and anorexia but showed longer TTP (5.3 vs. 1.8 months; p = 0.05), and OS (8.0 vs. 4.8 months; p = 0.09) than those without *6 and/or *28 (n = 29).

Conclusions

Salvage chemotherapy with irinotecan was moderately effective and well-tolerated in patients with APC refractory to gemcitabine and S-1. UGT1A1 polymorphisms were associated with toxicity and efficacy.     

Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis

Irinotecan unexpectedly causes severe toxicity of leukopenia or diarrhea. Irinotecan is metabolized to form active SN-38, which is further conjugated and detoxified by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 enzyme. Genetic polymorphisms of the UGT1A1 would affect an interindividual variation of the toxicity by irinotecan via the alternation of bioavailability of SN-38. In this case-control study, retrospective review of clinical records and determination of UGT1A1 polymorphisms were performed to investigate whether a patient with the variant UGT1A1 genotypes would be at higher risk for severe toxicity by irinotecan. All patients previously received irinotecan against cancer in university hospitals, cancer centers, or large urban hospitals in Japan. We identified 26 patients who experienced severe toxicity and 92 patients who did not. The relationship was studied between the multiple variant genotypes (UGT1A1*28 in the promoter and UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27, UGT1A1*29, and UGT1A1*7 in the coding region) and the severe toxicity of grade 4 leukopenia (< or =0.9 x 10(9)/liter) and/or grade 3 (watery for 5 days or more) or grade 4 (hemorrhagic or dehydration) diarrhea. Of the 26 patients with the severe toxicity, the genotypes of UGT1A1*28 were homozygous in 4 (15%) and heterozygous in 8 (31%), whereas 3 (3%) homozygous and 10 (11%) heterozygous were found among the 92 patients without the severe toxicity. Multivariate analysis suggested that the genotype either heterozygous or homozygous for UGT1A1*28 would be a significant risk factor for severe toxicity by irinotecan (P < 0.001; odds ratio, 7.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-22.3). All 3 patients heterozygous for UGT1A1*27 encountered severe toxicity. No statistical association of UGT1A1*6 with the occurrence of severe toxicity was observed. None had UGT1A1*29 or UGT1A1*7. We suggest that determination of the UGT1A1 genotypes might be clinically useful for predicting severe toxicity by irinotecan in cancer patients. This research warrants a prospective trial to corroborate the usefulness of gene diagnosis of UGT1A1 polymorphisms prior tb irinotecan chemotherapy.     

川东北地区人群结直肠癌患者UGT1A1*28基因多态性与伊立替康所致毒副反应的相关性

目的:观察结直肠癌患者UGT1A1*28基因多态性的分布频率,了解UGT1A1*28基因多态性与结直肠癌患者应用伊立替康联合5-氟尿嘧啶化疗毒副反应的相关性。方法:从384例接受伊立替康联合氟尿嘧啶一线化疗的晚期结直肠癌病例中采外周血提取DNA。采用PCR 法扩增目的基因片段,直接测序法分析UGT1A1*28基因多态性。临床观察并评价患者化疗毒副反应分级,统计分析UGT1A1*28基因表型与化疗毒副反应相关性。结果:全部 384例患者 UGT1A1*28基因多态性分布情况:TA6/6野生基因型287例(74.7％),TA6/7杂合基因型73例（19.0％）,TA7/7纯合基因型24例（6.3％）。化疗毒副反应和UGT1A1*28基因多态性进行临床单因素分析显示UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7、杂合型TA6/7与3-4度白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、腹泻、胆红素升高具有明显相关性（P<0.01）,UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7及杂合型TA6/7患者发生中性粒细胞减少的风险较UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6患者高5.625倍（OR=5.625）。UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7和UGT1A1*28基因杂合型TA6/7患者发生腹泻的风险较UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6患者高6.778倍（OR=6.778）。结论:UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7及杂合型TA6/7患者应用伊立替康化疗后发生重度中性粒细胞减少、重度腹泻的风险高于UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6,为临床伊立替康用药选择、剂量调整、毒副反应的提前干预提供理论依据。     

Genotype-directed, dose-finding study of irinotecan in cancer patients with UGT1A1*28 and/or UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms

Irinotecan-induced severe neutropenia is associated with homozygosity for the UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6 alleles. In this study, we determined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of irinotecan in patients with UGT1A1 polymorphisms. Patients who had received chemotherapy other than irinotecan for metastatic gastrointestinal cancer were enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups according to UGT1A1 genotypes: wild-type (*1/*1); heterozygous (*28/*1, *6/*1); or homozygous (*28/*28, *6/*6, *28/*6). Irinotecan was given every 2 weeks for two cycles. The wild-type group received a fixed dose of irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) to serve as a reference. The MTD was guided from 75 to 150 mg/m(2) by the continual reassessment method in the heterozygous and homozygous groups. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and pharmacokinetics were evaluated during cycle 1. Of 82 patients enrolled, DLT was assessable in 79 patients (wild-type, 40; heterozygous, 20; and homozygous, 19). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in one patient in the wild-type group, none in the heterozygous group, and six patients (grade 4 neutropenia) in the homozygous group. In the homozygous group, the MTD was 150 mg/m(2) and the probability of DLT was 37.4%. The second cycle was delayed because of neutropenia in 56.3% of the patients given the MTD. The AUC(0-24 h) of SN-38 was significantly greater (P < 0.001) and more widely distributed in the homozygous group. Patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*28 or UGT1A1*6 allele can receive irinotecan in a starting dose of 150 mg/m(2), but many required dose reductions or delayed treatment in subsequent cycles. UMIN Clinical Trial Registration number: UMIN000000618.     

UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康治疗结直肠癌不良反应的关系

背景与目的：尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸转移酶1A1(uridine diphosphoglucu-ronosyltransferase 1A1,UGTlA1)是伊立替康代谢关键酶,其活性受基因多态性影响显著。本研究探讨结直肠癌患者中,UGT1A1*28和UGT1A1*6基因多态性与伊立替康治疗相关不良反应之间的关系。方法：入组2013年4月—2013年12月于复旦大学附属中山医院肿瘤内科接受治疗的消化道恶性肿瘤患者160例。抽提外周血中基因组DNA,分别采用STR方法和Sanger测序法,检测UGT1A1*28和UGT1A1*6基因型,分析UGT1A1基因多态性分布情况。对其中82例化疗方案中含伊立替康的结直肠癌患者进行随访,记录不良反应发生情况和严重程度,比较不同基因型患者之间的差异。结果：160例消化道肿瘤患者中,UTG1A1*28(启动子TATA盒区域TA重复次数)野生型TA6/6124例(77.5%);杂合子TA6/7 33例(20.5%);纯合子TA7/7 3例(2.0%)。UGT1A1*6位点(211G>A)野生型GG 105例(65.6%),杂合子GA 48例(30.0%);纯合子AA 7例(4.4%)。82例化疗方案中含伊立替康的结直肠癌患者中,*28基因型(TA6/7和TA7/7)显著增加发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少的风险(58.3% vs 0.0%,P<0.001),并增加整体不良反应发生率(76.0% vs 45.6%,P<0.001);*6基因型(GA和AA)、年龄、性别、化疗方案和伊立替康相关不良反应发生无显著相关性。结论：接受伊立替康化疗的结直肠癌患者,UGT1A1*28位点多态性显著增加中性粒细胞减少发生的风险,可预测伊立替康引起的骨髓抑制性不良反应,辅助临床选择合适的化疗方案。     

UGT1A1*6 polymorphism is most predictive of severe neutropenia induced by irinotecan in Japanese cancer patients

Background  Gene polymorphisms of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1 family, polypeptide A1 (UGT1A1) contribute to individual variations in adverse events among patients administered irinotecan, and the distribution of the polymorphisms shows large interethnic differences. Variation in the solute carrier organic anion-transporter family, member 1B1 (SLCO1B1) gene also has a significant effect on the disposition of irinotecan in Asian cancer patients. In the present study, we evaluated the association of genetic polymorphisms of UGT1A1 and SLCO1B1 with irinotecanrelated neutropenia in Japanese cancer patients. Methods  One hundred and thirty-five consecutive patients treated with irinotecan were enrolled. Genotypes of UGT1A1 (*60, *28, *6, and *27) and SLCO1B1 (*1b, *5, and haplotype *15) were determined by direct sequencing. Severe neutropenia refers to events observed during the first cycle of irinotecan treatment. Results  Severe neutropenia was observed in 29 patients (22%). Six patients were homozygous and 48 heterozygous for UGT1A1*6. Only 1 patient was homozygous for UGT1A1*28. Homozygosity for UGT1A1*6 was associated with a high risk of severe neutropenia (odds ratio [OR], 7.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36 to 44.51). No significant association was found between severe neutropenia and other UGT1A1 polymorphisms or SLCO1B1 polymorphisms. Conclusion  These findings suggest that the UGT1A1*6 polymorphism is a potential predictor of severe neutropenia caused by irinotecan in Japanese cancer patients.     

Role of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28 and ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphisms in irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients

The objectives of the present study were (i) to study the pharmacogenetics of UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*28 and ABCG2 c.421C>A in three distinct healthy Asian populations (Chinese, Malays and Indians), and (ii) to investigate the polygenic influence of these polymorphic variants in irinotecan-induced neutropenia in Asian cancer patients. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic analyses were done after administration of irinotecan as a 90-min intravenous infusion of 375 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks (n = 45). Genotypic-phenotypic correlates showed a non-significant influence of UGT1A1*28 and ABCG2 c.421C>A polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of SN-38 (P > 0.05), as well as severity of neutropenia (P > 0.05). Significantly higher exposure levels to SN-38 (P = 0.018), lower relative extent of glucuronidation (REG; P = 0.006) and higher biliary index (BI; P = 0.003) were found in cancer patients homozygous for the UGT1A1*6 allele compared with patients harboring the reference genotype. The mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was 85% lower and the prevalence of grade 4 neutropenia (ANC < or = 500/microL) was 27% in patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 compared with the reference group. Furthermore, the presence of the UGT1A1*6 allele was associated with an approximately 3-fold increased risk of developing severe grade 4 neutropenia compared with patients harboring the reference genotype. These exploratory findings suggest that homozygosity for UGT1A1*6 allele may be associated with altered SN-38 disposition and may increase the risk of severe neutropenia in Asian cancer patients, particularly in the Chinese cancer patients who comprised 80% (n = 36) of the patient population in the present study.     

Additive effects of drug transporter genetic polymorphisms on irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in Japanese cancer patients

Purpose

Effects of genetic polymorphisms/variations of ABCB1, ABCC2, ABCG2 and SLCO1B1 in addition to “UGT1A1*28 or *6” on irinotecan pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in Japanese cancer patients were investigated.

Methods

Associations between transporter haplotypes/variations along with UGT1A1*28 or *6 and SN-38 area under the time–concentration curve (AUC) or neutropenia were examined in irinotecan monotherapy (55 patients) and irinotecan–cisplatin-combination therapy (62 patients).

Results

Higher SN-38 AUC values were observed in ABCB1 2677G>T (A893S) (*2 group) for both regimens. Associations of grade 3/4 neutropenia were observed with ABCC2 ?1774delG (*1A), ABCG2 421C>A (Q141K) and IVS12 + 49G>T ( ^# IIB) and SLCO1B1 521T>C (V174A) (*15 · 17) in the irinotecan monotherapy, while they were evident only in homozygotes of ABCB1*2, ABCG2 ^# IIB, SLCO1B1*15 · 17 in the cisplatin-combination therapy. With combinations of haplotypes/variations of two or more genes, neutropenia incidence increased, but their prediction power for grade 3/4 neutropenia is still unsatisfactory.

Conclusions

Certain transporter genotypes additively increased irinotecan-induced neutropenia, but their clinical importance should be further elucidated.     

UGT1A1 polymorphism and hyperbilirubinemia in a patient who received sorafenib

Purpose

To report a single case of uridine glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) polymorphism and hyperbilirubinemia in a patient who received sorafenib.

Methods

A 63-year-old man with cirrhosis was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma. His cirrhosis was categorized as Child-Pugh A, total bilirubin concentration was 24 μmol/L (normal range <20 μmol/L). The patient was enrolled in a phase I trial combination study of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin combined with sorafenib.

Results

After a single infusion of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide and 7 days of sorafenib, he presented with an elevated bilirubin concentration (48 μmol/L). Unconjugated bilirubin was 38 μmol/L and conjugated was 10 μmol/L. The patient was found to have one mutant allele (UGT1A1*28).

Conclusions

The isolated increase in serum bilirubin levels in our patient was probably due to sorafenib-induced UGT1A1 inhibition that manifested itself due both to the patient having one UGT1A1*28 allele and the presence of underlying liver disease. Bilirubin elevations in patients treated with sorafenib could indicate progression or drug toxicity; hence, these possibilities need to be ruled out. We would suggest that when patients develop hyperbilirubinemia while taking sorafenib for any indication, consideration be given to obtaining a fractionation of bilirubin and consideration of UGT1A1 genotyping in order to exclude a Gilbert’s syndrome as possible reason for the hyperbilrubinemia. Further studies are warranted to analyze the impact of sorafenib treatment on unconjugated bilirubin blood levels in patients with Gilbert’s syndrome.     

Association of MTHFR C677T polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk in Asians: evidence of 12,255 subjects

Objectives

To investigate the relationship of the MTHFR polymorphisms (C677T) and the risk of CRC by meta-analysis.

Methods

Relevant literatures concerning the association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and the risk of CRC were searched using the electronic database PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Odds ratio (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were determined to assess the gene–disease association using fixed or random effect models, according to the heterogeneity among included studies.

Results

The study shows that the MTHFR 677 TT homozygous genotype significantly decreases the risk of CRC in Asians (TT vs. CC: OR = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.73–0.92; TT vs. CT: OR = 0.84, 95 % CI 0.75–0.94; TT vs. CC+TT: OR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.75–0.93).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicated that the MTHFR 677 TT homozygous genotype decreased the risk of CRC in Asians, while the MTHFR 677 CT heterozygous genotype did not contribute to CRC susceptibility.     

UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康临床用药安全性及疗效的关系

目的：研究 UGT1A1基因多态性与伊立替康治疗结直肠癌患者的不良反应及疗效之间的关系。方法：自外周血中抽提基因组 DNA,进行 PCR 扩增,应用直接测序法分析2012年3月至2013年3月,于我院行基因检测的65例结直肠癌患者 UGT1A1*28和 UGT1A1*6基因多态性的分布情况。并对这65例应用含伊立替康方案化疗的患者出现的不良反应及化疗疗效,进行观察记录,比较不同基因型间的差异。结果：65例患者中,UGT1A1*28野生型 TA6／6有49例（75．4％）,杂合突变型 TA6／7有14例（21．5％）,纯合突变型TA7／7有2例（3．1％）。UGT1A1*6野生型 G／G 有47例（72．3％）,杂合突变型 G／A 有15例（23．1％）,纯合突变型 A ／A 有3例（4．6％）。在以上65例结直肠癌患者中,UGT1A1基因启动子区28位点,TA6／6、TA6／7和TA7／7型,发生3级以上腹泻者分别为8．2％、37．5％;发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少者分别为28．6％、62．5％。UGT1A1基因启动子区6位点,G／G、G／A 和 A ／A 型,发生3级以上腹泻者分别为12．8％、44．4％;发生3级以上中性粒细胞减少者分别为14．9％、22．2％。各组之间疗效无统计学差异。结论：患者 UGT1A1*28和UGT1A1*6多态性分布基本一致,UGT1A1*28突变型可以使应用含伊立替康化疗患者发生3级以上腹泻和中性粒细胞减少的风险增加。UGT1A1*6突变型可增加3级以上腹泻的发生风险。因此,UGT1A1基因型的检测对伊立替康相关的不良反应有一定的预测作用,可提高用药安全性,在临床用药中起到了指导作用。     

Differential toxicity biomarkers for irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Purpose

Oxaliplatin or irinotecan is usually administered jointly with fluoropyrimidines in colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Both drugs have different toxicity patterns. Biomarkers for predicting high-risk severe adverse reactions can help select the best treatment.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 106 colorectal cancer patients receiving an oxaliplatin-based treatment and 56 receiving an irinotecan-based treatment was performed. One copy number variant (GSTT1) and nine polymorphisms in irinotecan and oxaliplatin metabolism, transport or DNA repair genes (ABCB1, UGT1A1, XRCC1, ERCC1, ERCC2, GSTP1) were genotyped by SNaPshot, polymerase chain reactions’ length fragments, or copy number assays.

Results

In irinotecan-treated patients, C allele of ABCB1 C1236T SNP was associated with a lower risk of asthenia (OR = 0.043; 96 % CI = 0.004–0.444; P = 0.008) and C allele of ABCB1 C3435T SNP was associated with a lower risk of diarrhea (OR = 0.162; 95 % CI = 0.031–0.844; P = 0.031); and individuals with two copies of GSTT1 gene had a lower risk for asthenia (OR = 0.074; 95 % CI = 0.009–0.617; P = 0.016). In oxaliplatin-treated patients, carriers of two C variants of Asn118Asn ERCC1 SNP had a lower risk for neutropenia (OR = 0.203; 95 % CI = 0.060–0.683; P = 0.01).

Conclusions

These biomarkers could help oncologists select the best treatment by reducing toxicity associated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer patients, thus increasing their quality of life.     

Pharmacogenetic impact of polymorphisms in the coding region of the UGT1A1 gene on SN-38 glucuronidation in Japanese patients with cancer

Pharmacogenetic testing for UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*28, a promoter variant of the UGT1A1 gene, is now carried out clinically to estimate the risk of irinotecan-associated toxicity. We studied the clinical significance of UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*27, two variants in exon 1 of the UGT1A1 gene that are found mainly in Asians. The study group comprised 46 Japanese patients who received various regimens of chemotherapy including irinotecan at doses from 50 to 180 mg/m(2). Pharmacogenetic relationships were explored between the UGT1A1 genotype and the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) of the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38) to that of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), used as a surrogate for UGT1A1 activity (AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G)). No patient was homozygous for UGT1A1*28, and none had UGT1A1*27. Two were heterozygous for UGT1A1*28. Two were homozygous and 15 heterozygous for UGT1A1*6, all of whom were wild type with respect to UGT1A1*28. Two patients were simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, present on different chromosomes. The other 25 patients had none of the variants studied. The two patients simultaneously heterozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 and the two patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 had significantly higher AUC(SN-38)/AUC(SN-38G) ratios than the others (P = 0.0039). Concurrence of UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6, even when heterozygous, altered the disposition of irinotecan remarkably, potentially increasing susceptibility to toxicity. Patients homozygous for UGT1A1*6 should also be carefully monitored. UGT1A1 polymorphisms in the coding region of the UGT1A1 gene should be genotyped in addition to testing for UGT1A1*28 to more accurately predict irinotecan-related toxicity, at least in Asian patients.     

Association of UGT2B7 and ABCB1 genotypes with morphine-induced adverse drug reactions in Japanese patients with cancer

Purpose

To investigate the effects of genetic polymorphisms on morphine-induced adverse events in cancer patients.

Methods

We examined the relation of morphine-related adverse events to polymorphisms in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 2B7, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B, number 1 (ABCB1), and μ-opioid receptor 1 genes in 32 Japanese cancer patients receiving oral controlled-release morphine sulfate tablets.

Results

The T/T genotype at 1236 or TT/TT diplotype at 2677 and 3435 in ABCB1 was associated with significantly lower frequency of fatigue (grades 1–3) (P = 0.012 or 0.011, Fisher’s exact test). The UGT2B7*2 genotype was associated with the frequency of nausea (grades 1–3) (P = 0.023). The frequency of nausea was higher in patients without UGT2B7*2 allele than others. The diplotype at 2677 and 3435 in ABCB1 was associated with the frequency of vomiting (grades 1–3) (P = 0.011). No patient whose diplotype was consisted of no GC allele at 2677 and 3435 suffered from vomiting.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that pharmacogenetics can be used to predict the risk of morphine-induced adverse events.     

The effect of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 polymorphisms on gastric cancer risk among different ethnicities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Potential Cytochrome P450s (CYPs) 1A1 MspI, 1A1 Ile462Val, 1A2*1 F, and/or 1A2*1C polymorphisms have been implicated in gastric cancer risk among different ethnicities. We aimed to explore the effect of CYP 1A1 MspI, 1A1 Ile462Val, 1A2*1 F, and/or 1A2*1C polymorphisms on the susceptibility to gastric cancer among different ethnicities through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Each initially included article was scored for quality appraisal. Desirable data were extracted and registered into databases. A number of 11 studies were ultimately eligible for the meta-analysis of CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism, eight studies for the meta-analysis of 1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism, and two studies for the meta-analysis of 1A2*1 F polymorphism. None of genetic model was evidently suggested, and thus all the genetic models were presented. Potential sources of heterogeneity were sought out via subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and publication biases were estimated. In our meta-analysis, significant results could be found in mutational heterozygous CT genotype, compared with wild TT genotype, among large sample size subgroup for CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism. Regarding CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism, no statistically significant results could be found. For CYP1A2*1 F polymorphism, mutational heterozygous AC genotype, compared with wild-type AA, has deleterious effects, whereas mutational homozygous CC genotype, compared with mutational heterozygous type AC, has protective effects but lacks statistically significant difference despite its a proximity to 0.05. Combined mutational homozygous CC genotype and wild-type homozygous AA, compared with mutational heterozygous AC genotype, has protective effects. Our meta-analysis suggests no associations between CYP1A1 Ile462Val polymorphism and gastric cancer, but possible associations between CYP1A1 MspI and CYP1A2*1 F polymorphisms and gastric cancer, which needs to be further reinforced or refuted among different ethnicities in well-designed large-scale high-quality studies.