Screening for WBC antibodies by lymphocyte indirect immunofluorescence flow cytometry: superior to cytotoxicity and ELISA?

BACKGROUND: Cytotoxic WBC antibodies are found in patients who have refractoriness to platelet transfusion (RPT) or are experiencing febrile transfusion reactions (FTRs) and in sera giving so called nonspecific hemagglutination by IAT (N/S IAT). Sera from such patients were screened for WBC antibodies regardless of the ability to fix complement using a flow cytometric (FC) lymphocyte indirect immunofluorescence test (LIFT) to compare FC-LIFT with a routine lymphocytotoxicity test (LCT) for WBC antibody detection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum from 104 patients with RPT, 87 with FTR, and 147 with N/S IAT were tested in parallel by using FC-LIFT and LCT. Sera giving discrepant results were re-tested with an HLA class I antibody ELISA to assess whether they were HLA-specific. RESULTS: Of the sera tested, 175 were LIFT positive, and 146 were LCT positive. Fifty-five had antibodies that were detectable only by LIFT; 26 were positive only by LCT. Of these 81 discrepant sera, 30 of 63 were positive in HLA ELISA. CONCLUSION: FC-LIFT detects more WBC antibodies than does LCT or ELISA, and it is a superior screening technique. Because some cytotoxic antibodies are detectable only by LCT, comprehensive WBC antibody screening would require the application of both techniques. However, because FC assessments of cytotoxicity have been described, LCTs may become redundant for WBC antibody screening.     

Platelet alloantibodies in transfused patients

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving cellular blood components may form HLA antibodies and platelet-specific alloantibodies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum samples from a cohort of 252 patients with hematologic or oncologic diseases who are receiving cellular blood components were studied for platelet-reactive antibodies. Specificity of platelet alloantibodies was determined with a panel of typed platelets RESULTS: Platelet-reactive antibodies were detected in the sera of 113 patients (44.8% of 252), HLA antibodies in the sera of 108 (42.9%), and platelet-specific antibodies in the sera of 20 (8%). The following platelet-specific antibodies were identified: anti-HPA-5b (n = 10), anti-HPA-1b (n = 4), anti-HPA-5a (n = 2), anti-HPA-1a (n = 1), anti-HPA-2b (n = 1), anti-HPA-1b+5b (n = 1), and anti-HPA-1b+2b (n = 1). Fifteen sera from the 108 patients with anti-HLA (13.9%) contained additional platelet-specific alloantibodies, while in 5 sera, platelet-specific alloantibodies only were detected: anti-HPA-5b (n = 4) and anti-HPA-1a (n = 1). Of the 108 sera with HLA antibodies, 29 (26.9%) showed discordant results when studied with the lymphocytotoxicity test and the glycoprotein-specific immunoassay. Ten sera contained panreactive antibodies against platelet glycoproteins (GP) IIb/IIIa, GPIa/IIa, and/or GPIb/IX. Alloimmunization occurred in 58.3 percent of female patients with previous pregnancies, but in only 23.3 percent of those without previous pregnancies (p = 0.0049). CONCLUSION: Platelet alloantibody specificities in transfused patients (predominantly anti-HPA-5b and -1b with antigen frequencies <30% among whites) differ significantly from those observed in patients with neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia or posttransfusion purpura, in whom anti-HPA-1a (antigen frequency >95%) is the most prevalent specificity. HLA antibody detection yields discordant results when the lymphocytotoxicity assay and a glycoprotein-specific immunoglobulin-binding assay are used.     

Antibodies to private and public HLA class I epitopes in platelet recipients

BACKGROUND: Transfusions or pregnancies can cause immunization against private HLA determinants and public epitopes shared by more than one private HLA antigen. HLA antibodies are correlated with febrile transfusion reactions, lower platelet response following platelet transfusion, and an increased rate of renal transplant rejection. Until now, antibody specificities in alloantisera from platelet recipients have been poorly characterized. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Consecutive serum screens from platelet recipients were analyzed for antibodies against private HLA class I antigens and public HLA epitopes using a serum analysis program based on the 2 x 2 table analysis of correlations. Serum screens of highly immunized patients and of patients with new alloimmunization events were reviewed separately. RESULTS: Of the serum screens from 566 platelet recipients, 1577 indicated alloimmunization (panel-reactive antibodies >5%). The program assigned a specificity in 1024 of these screens (64.9%) and at least once in 522 of 566 patients (92.2%). In 267 patients, antibodies detecting public epitopes in the combined A- or B-locus cross-reacting groups were found; other public markers were detected in 39 patients. Patterns of reactivity were remarkably less stable than in patient groups previously studied. In many patients, antibodies with apparent private epitope specificity preceded the identification of antibodies against a shared marker of the same cross-reactive group. However, the disappearance of antibodies (whether or not this was followed by a new antibody against a private or public marker belonging to another cross-reacting group) was also observed. CONCLUSION: The computerized analysis of microlymphocytotoxicity tests enhances the rate of antibody specification in sera from platelet recipients with lymphocytotoxic antibodies. The identified antibodies should be taken into account in the selection of platelet donors. The data confirm and extend previous observations on HLA class I antibodies and elucidate new alloimmunization events.     

Corrected count increment and percent platelet recovery as measures of posttransfusion platelet response: problems and a solution

BACKGROUND: Corrected count increment (CCI) and percent platelet recovery (PPR) are measures of response to platelet transfusion that "correct" the count increment for blood volume and number of platelets transfused. Their potential for data distortion is described, and a regression analysis is suggested that is more informative and avoids the inherent problems associated with using ratios as outcome measures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from the first platelet transfusion for 585 patients from the Trial to Reduce Alloimmunization to Platelets (TRAP) were used to model methods of analyzing posttransfusion platelet response. RESULTS: By linear regression analysis, unfiltered platelet components gave a greater posttransfusion increment on average (p = 0.001), but filtered platelets gave a greater increment per platelet transfused (p = 0.003). In contrast, CCI and PPR showed no difference between filtered and unfiltered platelets (p = 0.36 and p = 0.29, respectively) because they combined the effects of dose, filtration, and patient size. Slightly fewer patients are required for a study analyzed by regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Regression analysis of posttransfusion platelet increments should be used instead of CCI or PPR to compare the efficacy of platelet components. CCI and PPR should not be used to define platelet refractoriness as a study outcome, because these measures are biased in favor of platelet preparation techniques that provide fewer platelets.     

Clinical consequences of alterations in platelet transfusion dose: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND: The dose-response relationship for platelet transfusion has become increasingly important as the use of platelet transfusion has grown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-eight prophylactic apheresis platelet transfusions were administered to 46 patients undergoing high-dose therapy followed by hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multiple-crossover study. Transfusions were administered in pairs, differing only in platelet content. Each pair consisted of a lower-dose platelet component (LDP) and a higher-dose platelet component (HDP) administered in random order to the same patient. LDPs contained a mean of 3.1 x 10(11) platelets (range, 2.3-3.5 x 10(11)), and HDPs contained a mean of 5.0 x 10(11) platelets (range, 4.5-6.1 x 10(11)). Patients with active bleeding and those who were refractory to platelet transfusions were excluded. RESULTS: The mean posttransfusion platelet count increment with LDP was 17,010 per microL, and that with HDP was 31,057 per microL (p<0.0001). Only 37 percent of LDPs resulted in platelet count increments of at least 20,000 per microL, whereas 81 percent of HDPs resulted in increments above this level (p<0.0001). The mean transfusion-free interval with LDP was 2.16 days, whereas that with HDP was 3.03 days (p<0.01). Administration of LDPs was associated with a 39 to 82 percent increase in the relative risk (per day) of requiring subsequent platelet transfusions (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: As compared to the administration of HDPs, the administration of LDPs for prophylactic transfusion in hematopoietic progenitor cell transplant patients results in a lower platelet count increment, a lower likelihood of obtaining a posttransfusion platelet increment >20,000 per microL, a shorter transfusion-free interval, and a greater relative risk per day of requiring additional transfusions.     

Platelet-specific antibodies in HLA-immunized patients receiving chronic platelet support

BACKGROUND: In HLA-alloimmunized patients, the unexpected failure of HLA-matched platelet transfusions usually raises the suspicion about concomitant platelet-specific antibodies. As the reported frequency of platelet-specific antibodies in multitransfused patients varies widely, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of such antibodies in a population of chronic thrombocytopenic patients with HLA antibodies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From 1985 to 1997, 11,777 determinations of HLA antibodies were performed in 1330 hematologic patients receiving chronic platelet support. Fifty-two patients with HLA alloimmunization that lasted more than 1 month were selected. The search for platelet-specific antibodies was performed by using a monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens assay, thus allowing the identification of platelet-specific antibodies directed against the platelet glycoproteins (GP) Ib/IX, GPIIb/IIIa, and GPIa/IIa. Specificity of the platelet-specific antibodies was further investigated by using a solid-phase assay with chloroquine-treated platelets. RESULTS: Only 2 (3.8%) of the 52 patients had platelet-specific antibodies. One antibody reacted with an epitope of the GPIIb/IIIa that was present in all the panel platelets, and that probably was an autoantibody. The other was an anti-HPA-5b. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of platelet-specific antibodies in patients with HLA alloimmunization is very small. The search for concomitant platelet-specific antibodies would be indicated only when other causes of refractoriness to HLA-matched platelets are ruled out.     

Evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (GTI PakPlus) for the detection of antibodies against human platelet antigens

Twenty-six serum samples from 24 patients were investigated for the presence of platelet-specific antibodies in a partly retrospective (n = 15) and partly prospective (n = 9) study. The sera contained either alloantibodies to human platelet antigens (HPA) (n = 23) or were from clinically suspected cases of fetomaternal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FMAITP) in which platelet-specific antibodies had not been detected (n = 3). Three techniques were used to detect platelet antibodies: the platelet immunofluorescence test, the monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay and a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay--GTI PakPlus (GTI kit). Two alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antiglobulin reagents provided by the manufacturer were used in the GTI kit: an antihuman IgG/IgA/IgM (IgGAM) conjugate and an antihuman IgG conjugate. The GTI kit with the anti-IgGAM conjugate failed to detect eight antibody specificities in seven sera (anti-HPA-1a [n = 3], anti-HPA-3a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3b [n = 1] and anti-HPA-5b [n = 3]). Greater signal-to-background ratios were achieved in the GTI kit with the anti-IgG conjugate but five antibody specificities (anti-HPA-1a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3a [n = 1], anti-HPA-3b [n = 1], anti-HPA-5b [n = 2]) remained undetectable. All the sera were detected by MAIPA assay and, furthermore, the MAIPA assay achieved the greatest signal-to-background ratio in the majority of sera tested. These findings re-emphasize the value of the MAIPA assay in reference laboratories and illustrate that the GTI kit may either fail to detect or incorrectly identify clinically significant HPA antibodies.     

The detection of platelet antibodies by simultaneous analysis of specific platelet antibodies and the monoclonal antibody–specific immobilization of platelet antigens: an interlaboratory comparison

BACKGROUND: Glycoprotein (GP)‐specific platelet (PLT) antibodies can cause allo‐ or autoimmune thrombocytopenia. Their detection is of high diagnostic value. The simultaneous analysis of specific PLT antibodies (SASPA) assay is based on simultaneous detection of various PLT‐specific antibodies by flow cytometry and has entered routine use in our Mannheim institution. In this study, we performed an interlaboratory comparison investigation of PLT‐specific antibodies using SASPA versus the “gold standard,” the monoclonal antibody–specific immobilization of PLT antigen (MAIPA) assay. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sera from 194 patients with suspected PLT allo‐ or autoantibodies were tested against GPIIb/IIIa, IX, Ia/IIa, IV, and HLA Class I by SASPA (in Mannheim) and MAIPA (in Vienna). All data were reported blinded to those from the respective other method. Sensitivity studies included dilution studies with known antibodies against HPA‐1a, ‐1b, ‐3b, ‐5b, and ‐15b and HLA Class I. RESULTS: Overall, results were concordant in 78.9%. The specificity and sensitivity of SASPA, based on the MAIPA results, were 97.3 and 86.3%, respectively, for the detection of alloantibodies. The respective results for the detection of autoantibodies were 95.3 and 44.9%. Serial dilution experiments with sera containing anti‐HPA1a, ‐1b, ‐3b, ‐5b, and ‐15b and anti‐HLA Class I revealed a higher sensitivity of the SASPA assay with all alloantibodies. CONCLUSION: In this first blind interlaboratory comparison, SASPA yielded similar results to those of MAIPA. The SASPA assay may be superior to the MAIPA assay for the detection of weak alloantibodies while simultaneous detection of a variety of antibody specificities or immunoglobulin classes and the need of fewer PLTs are obvious advantages.     

Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia caused by human leucocyte antigen-B27 antibody

Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) occurs when maternal alloantibodies to antigens presented on foetal platelets cause their immune destruction. Whether human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies can cause NAIT is controversial. Here, a patient was described who suffered from a NAIT caused by an HLA-B27 antibody. Sera from the mother and the newborn were tested for human platelet antigen antibodies and HLA antibodies by monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay, solid phase-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), lymphocytotoxicity assay (LCT) and flow cytometric analysis. No antibodies against cluster designation (CD)109 and platelet glycoproteins of the father were found in patient's and mother's serum. However, HLA ELISA was used to identify HLA antibody in both sera. The antibody was specified as HLA-B27 antibody. Typing results showed that the father descended HLA-B27 antigen on patient and his brother. The mother was HLA-B27 negative. It is most conceivable that the previous pregnancy of the mother induced the production of anti-HLA-B27 antibody, which crossed the placenta and subsequently caused an NAIT in the case presented.     

Flow cytometric detection of platelet-reactive antibodies and application in platelet crossmatching

Background: Alloimmunization against HLA or platelet antigens can cause refractoriness to platelet transfusions in multiply transfused patients. Crossmatching of platelet concentrates is effective in overcoming this problem. Study Design and Methods: A flow cytometric assay was used for simultaneous detection of lymphocyte-reactive and platelet-reactive antibodies in a single sample using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled anti-IgG. This assay was compared with the monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigens (MAIPA) assay in selected sera containing HLA and platelet antibodies. In a further study, this assay was compared with lymphocytotoxicity test results from thrombocytopenic patients, for whom platelet concentrates were ordered. The results of both assays were then correlated with the 1-hour corrected count increment, with a corrected count increment greater then 7500 considered as an adequate transfusion response. Results: The results of the MAIPA and flow cytometric assay in detecting platelet-reactive antibodies correlated well (p<0.0001, r = 0.84). The sensitivity and specificity of the flow cytometric assay in detecting platelet-reactive antibodies were 94.7 and 96.3 percent, when the MAIPA assay was taken as a reference. In unselected sera from patients, the sensitivity and specificity of the flow cytometric assays were, respectively, 72.7 and 91.7 percent in detecting lymphocyte- reactive antibodies and 70.6 and 77.7 percent in detecting platelet- reactive antibodies, when the lymphocytotoxicity test was used as a reference. With regard to an adequate transfusion response, the sensitivities and efficiencies were 20.0 and 82.1 percent, 33.3 and 84.3 percent, and 70.0 and 88.6 percent for the lymphocytotoxicity test and the lymphocyte-reactive and platelet-reactive flow cytometric assays, respectively. Conclusion: Flow cytometric crossmatching appears to be an effective method of detecting platelet-reactive antibodies that may affect the success of platelet transfusions. This procedure is well-suited for routine conditions and can be performed within 2 hours.     

Detection of HLA antibodies by platelet crossmatching techniques

Thirty-seven monospecific HLA antibodies directed against all common HLA-A and -B loci and reactive by the microlymphocytotoxicity assay (LCT) were tested against platelets carrying the corresponding antigen by three platelet crossmatch methods, the platelet immunofluorescence test (PIFT), platelet enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (P-ELISA), and platelet radioimmunoassay (P-RIA). Positive reactions were obtained with the PIFT in 67 percent, the P-ELISA in 41 percent, and the P-RIA in 49 percent of 85 cell-serum pairs. The same cell-serum combinations gave 49 percent positive reactions in the lymphocyte immunofluorescence test. Three multispecific HLA antisera were positive in nine of nine cell-serum combinations by all four methods. Thirteen transfusions were given to eight patients with known HLA antibodies. All donor-recipient pairs were LCT positive, six were PIFT positive, and seven were PIFT negative. Three of seven PIFT-negative and none of six PIFT-positive transfusions were successful. Thus, platelet crossmatching is less sensitive than the LCT for the detection of complement-binding monospecific HLA antibodies. The platelet crossmatch, however, is able to identify some potentially successful HLA-incompatible donors for patients with multispecific HLA antibodies and limited access to HLA-identical donors.     

Platelet crossmatching with lymphocytotoxicity test: an effective method in alloimmunized Chinese patients

Fifty-three patients receiving long-term platelet transfusions were regularly screened for platelet-associated antibodies by a platelet suspension immunofluorescence test (PSIFT) and a lymphocytotoxicity test (LCT). Subsequently, 24 patients became alloimmunized; all of their antibodies were of HLA specificity. Eighty-two single-donor platelet transfusions were given, and the clinical responses were considered satisfactory if the 18-hour corrected count increment was 7.5 x 10(3) per microL or higher. In the meantime, 82 pairs of patient sera and donor lymphocytes were crossmatched. Among 63 crossmatched transfusions, 53 (84%) resulted in a satisfactory increment, with a mean (+/- SEM) of 17.71 +/- 1.96 (x 10(3)/microL), and 10 did not result in a satisfactory increment. The increments after 19 unmatched transfusions and 25 random-donor (uncrossmatched) transfusions were 0.7 +/- 0.3 and 2.39 +/- 0.66, respectively. The difference was not significant (p greater than 0.05). The agreement between the LCT results and clinical response was 88 percent. Retrospectively, the corrected count increments showed no significant differences (p greater than 0.05) among three groups of HLA grading: the increments for A/BU/BX, C/D, and random HLA matches were 22.97 +/- 4.07, 15.1 +/- 1.97, and 14.85 +/- 2.04, respectively. These results suggest that platelet crossmatching by LCT is an effective method for use in alloimmunized patients, especially Chinese patients.     

Flow cytometric platelet cross-matching to predict platelet transfusion in acute leukemia

A great variety of patient- and product-related factors influence the outcome of platelet transfusions. Our study assessed the predictive value of a flow cytometric platelet cross match test for the outcome of HLA matched and unmatched platelet transfusions in patients with acute leukemia. Thirty nine patients (26 adults and 13 children) received 60 ABO compatible apheresis platelet unites ranging from 1 to 4 per patient (mean = 1.54; median = 2). We performed flowcytometric platelet cross-matching, HLA Class I typing by sequence-specific primer (SSP) for patients and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) for donors and screening of HLA Class I antibodies by ELISA. Effectiveness of platelet transfusion was evaluated using the corrected count increment which was calculated at 60 min and 18- to 24-h posttransfusion. Multivariate analysis was performed to detect which variable can predict transfusion response more than others. Cross-matched platelet transfusions associated with good response in 51.4% of transfusion events in adults and 73.3% in children. The noncrossmatched platelet transfusions associated with poor response in 83.3% in adults and 100% in children (P-values 0.143, 0.041, respectively). In the presence of clinical factors or HLA alloimmunization in adults, cross-matched platelets were associated with good response in 29.6 and 22.2% respectively. In children this occurred in 81.8 and 66.7%, respectively. In presence or absence of HLA matching, flow cytometry platelet cross-matching was the most predictor for transfusion response (P = 0.05). Because of the difficulties to find frequent HLA matched donors for acute leukemia patients; flow cytometric platelet cross-matching may provide the most useful way for selecting donors. It is useful even in the presence of alloimunization in children.     

Platelet transfusion refractoriness associated with HPA-1a (Pl(A1)) alloantibody without coexistent HLA antibodies successfully treated with antigen-negative platelet transfusions

BACKGROUND: Alloimmune-mediated refractoriness to platelet transfusion is most commonly due to antibody to HLA antigens in multiply transfused or multiparous patients. Published reports of poor transfusion response due to antibodies to platelet-specific antigens are rare and often confounded by the presence of coexistent antibodies against HLA antigens. CASE REPORT: A case is presented of a multiparous woman with acute myelogenous leukemia whose sole cause of transfusion refractoriness was antibody to platelet antigen HPA-1a. She responded dramatically to HPA-1a-negative platelet transfusion. CONCLUSION: This case provides strong serologic and clinical evidence that platelet transfusion refractoriness may result from antibodies to platelet-specific antigens.     

Use of in vitro assays in selection of compatible platelet donors

Although HLA-matched platelet transfusions are of value in the support of some alloimmunized thrombocytopenic patients, poor posttransfusion increments can be observed following HLA-matched platelet transfusions and conversely good posttransfusion increments may result after HLA- mismatched platelet transfusions. We have explored the possibility that in vitro assays in addition to HLA typing might better select compatible donors for refractory recipients. Our studies suggested that a platelet migration inhibition assay is predictive of platelet transfusion responses in HLA-compatible and incompatible donor- recipient pairs, while lymphocytotoxicity is predictive of posttransfusion increments only in HLA-incompatible donor-recipient pairs. Granulocytotoxicity, microleukoagglutination, and capillary leukoagglutination showed no value in predicting platelet transfusion increments, either in HLA-compatible or incompatible donor-recipient pairs.     

Single-donor platelets reduce the risk of septic platelet transfusion reactions

BACKGROUND: Septic platelet transfusion reactions (SPTRs) are the most common, serious risk of transfusion. Because SPTRs result from donor skin flora or asymptomatic bacteremia, the use of single-donor platelets (SDPs) has been proposed to reduce the risk of SPTRs from the risks with pools of platelet concentrates (PCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Beginning in 1986, all febrile transfusion reactions were evaluated by culture of the platelet bag. Confirmed SPTRs were identified by isolation of the same bacteria from the bag and the patient's blood or by positive Gram's stain of the bag that confirmed a positive platelet culture. In 1987, a program to minimize PC use in favor of SDP use was initiated as a means of reducing SPTRs. RESULTS: In 12 years, the use of SDPs increased from 51.7 percent to 99.4 percent of all platelet transfusions at one institution. SPTRs fell from three events in 1 year to the current rate of one event per year. The incidence of SPTRs decreased from 1 in 4,818 transfusions to 1 in 15,098 transfusions. The rate of SPTRs due to PCs was 5.39 times higher than that of SPTRs due to SDPs (95% CI, 1.89,12.9). CONCLUSION: The use of SDPs is a simple means of reducing SPTRs. Other measures such as sterilization will be required to eliminate all SPTRs.     

Independent roles for platelet crossmatching and HLA in the selection of platelets for alloimmunized patients

BACKGROUND: Although HLA-matched platelets are frequently requested for alloimmunized patients, recent evidence has indicated that 1-hour posttransfusion platelet increments in these patients are specifically sensitive to crossmatch compatibility. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine the extent of advantage gained by use of single-donor apheresis (SD) platelets selected on the basis of HLA match when crossmatch-compatible SD platelets were available, a total of 220 platelet transfusions given in the absence of individually determined significant nonimmune factors were analyzed in a well-characterized cohort of platelet-refractory patients. Platelets were selected by solid-phase crossmatch from a small donor pool of relatively poor HLA matches or, upon request, ordered as HLA-matched and later crossmatched. RESULTS: Alloimmunized patients responded better to SD platelets selected on the basis of HLA than to pooled platelet concentrates or SD platelets selected at random, although most of the benefit was limited to the 57-percent subset of good HLA matches. Crossmatch-compatible SD platelets provided similar posttransfusion platelet increments independent of the HLA match. None of 31 crossmatch- incompatible SD platelets transfused provided an adequate increment, including 13 that were ordered as HLA-matched platelets. CONCLUSION: No benefit could be demonstrated from requesting that SD platelets be HLA- matched when crossmatch-compatible SD platelets were available.     

WBC-reduced platelet concentrates from pooled buffy coats in additive solution: an evaluation of in vitro and in vivo measures

BACKGROUND: The use of a platelet additive solution (PAS-II, Baxter) may have benefits over plasma for storage of platelets. It was the aim of this study to develop a method to produce WBC-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs) in PAS-II with >240 x 10(9) platelets and <1 x 10(6) WBCs per unit, which can be stored for 5 days at pH >6.8 and that will give sufficient platelet increments after transfusion: a 1-hour CCI of >7.5 and a 20-hour CCI of >2.5. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PCs were made from five pooled buffy coats and 250 g of PAS-II. After centrifugation the PCs were WBC-reduced with a filter (Autostop BC, Pall Biomedical) and stored in a 1000-mL polyolefin container. CCIs were assessed in stable hemato-oncologic patients after 5-day old PCs were transfused. RESULTS: Routinely produced PCs contained a median of 310 x 10(9) platelets (n = 5,363) with 3.5 percent containing <240 x 10(9) platelets, in a median volume of 320 mL (n = 11,834). The median number of WBCs was <0.03 x 10(6) (n = 694). The WBC count exceeded 1 x 10(6) in three PCs, but it was always <5 x 10(6), giving 99-percent confidence that more than 99.5 percent of the units will contain <1 x 10(6) WBCs. The pH remained >6.8 on Day 8, provided the concentration was below 1.1 x 10(9) platelets per mL (n = 32). After 28 transfusions in 28 patients, the 1-hour CCI was 12.6 +/- 4.3 (mean +/- SD, with 2/28 CCIs <7.5) and the 20-hour CCI was 8.9 +/- 5.6 (with 4/28 CCIs <2.5). Limitations of this study include the absence of a control group of patients receiving platelets stored in plasma and of in vivo radiolabeled survival studies, but a comparison of these data with previously published data suggested that the in vivo survival of platelets stored in PAS-II is less than that of platelets stored in plasma. CONCLUSION: The WBC-reduced PCs conformed to specifications. These WBC-reduced PCs could be stored at least 5 days with maintenance of pH, and they gave sufficient increments after transfusion to patients.     

Growth of bacteria in inoculated platelets: implications for bacteria detection and the extension of platelet storage

BACKGROUND: Recent reports from Europe have advocated the use of bacterial culturing of platelets on Day 2 or 3 of storage to extend the shelf life of platelets to 7 days, thereby reducing the outdating of platelets and preserving a limited medical resource. To assess the optimal timing, the necessary sensitivity, and the possible efficacy of bacterial detection, the bacterial growth characteristics were reviewed in 165 platelet units, each inoculated on the day of collection with one of the following organisms: Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus aureus, and Staphylococcus epidermidis from four previously published studies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Quantitative culture data from inoculated platelet concentrates from five sites and four studies were combined into one database and analyzed for bacterial concentration thresholds (> or =10(1), > or =10(2), > or =10(3), > or =10(4), > or =10(5) CFU/mL) by day of storage. RESULTS: All examples of B. cereus, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, S. marcescens, and S. aureus had concentrations > or =10(2) CFU per mL by Day 3 after inoculation. By Day 4, all units with these organisms contained > or =10(5) CFU per mL. Units contaminated with S. epidermidis showed slower and more varied growth. By Day 3 after inoculation, 81.3 percent had 10(2) CFU per mL. By Day 4 after inoculation, 46 (95.8%) of 48 units had concentrations > or =10(2) CFU per mL. CONCLUSION: These experiments suggest that an assay capable of detecting 10(2) CFU per mL on Day 3 of storage would detect the vast majority of bacterially contaminated platelet units, prevent many cases of platelet-associated bacterial sepsis, and provide a scientific basis for the extension of the current platelet storage time. It would be expected that a rare, slow-growing organism could escape such a detection scheme.     

Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patients on the basis of HLA antibody specificity

BACKGROUND: Patients who are refractory to platelet transfusion as a result of HLA alloimmunization are generally given HLA-matched or crossmatched platelets. However, HLA-matched platelets that are matched at HLA-A and -B loci (A-matched) or those without any mismatched or cross-reactive antigens (BU-matched) are frequently unavailable. A disadvantage of crossmatching is that crossmatched platelets have a shelf life of only 5 days, so that crossmatch tests must be performed frequently for patients requiring long-term platelet transfusions. An alternative method is the selection of platelets according to the patient's HLA antibody specificity, called the antibody specificity prediction (ASP) method. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anti-human globulin-enhanced microlymphocytotoxicity test modified by a double addition of serum and a computer program were used to determine the specificity of patients' HLA antibodies. Platelet crossmatching was performed with a solid-phase adherence assay. The percentage of platelet recovery (PPR) was determined in 1621 platelet transfusions in an observational study in 114 patients, and the PPR of platelets selected by the ASP method was compared with the PPR of those that were HLA-matched, crossmatched, or randomly selected. The numbers of potential donors in files of HLA-typed donors as identified by HLA matching vs. the ASP method were determined. RESULTS: After adjustments for covariates, the mean +/- SEM PPR was similar for HLA-matched (21 +/-4%), cross-matched (23+/-4%), and ASP-selected (24+/-3%) platelets and was significantly lower for randomly selected (15+/-1.4%) platelets. For 29 alloimmunized HLA-typed patients, the mean number of potential donors found in a file of 7247 HLA-typed donors was 6 who were an HLA-A match (median = 1), 33 who were an HLA-BU match (median = 20), and 1426 who were identified by the ASP method (median = 1365). CONCLUSION: The ASP method of donor selection for refractory alloimmunized patients appears as effective as HLA matching or crossmatching. Far more donors are identified in a file of HLA-typed donors by the ASP method than by HLA matching, and this indicates that the ASP method provides important advantages regarding the availability of compatible platelet components.