Cannabinoids Prevent the Effects of a Footshock Followed by Situational Reminders on Emotional Processing

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can develop following exposure to a traumatic event. Hence, what we do in the first few hours after trauma exposure may alter the trajectory of PTSD. We examined whether cannabinoids can prevent the effects of a single footshock followed by situational reminders (SRs) on emotional processing. Rats were exposed to a footshock (1.5 mA, 10 s) on day 1 followed by exposure to SRs of the shock on days 3 and 5. The CB1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 or vehicle were injected intraperitoneally 2 h after the shock. After 1 week, PTSD-like symptoms were examined. Exposure to SRs exacerbated the effects of the shock as rats exposed to shock and SRs, but not shock alone, showed impaired extinction of the traumatic event, impaired plasticity in the hippocmapal-accumbens pathway, enhanced latency to startle, and altered expression of CB1 receptors (CB1r) and glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) in the CA1, basolateral amygdala (BLA) and prefrontal cortex (PFC). WIN55,212-2 prevented the effects of the shock and SRs on extinction, plasticity, and startle response. WIN55,212-2 normalized the shock/SR-induced upregulation in CB1r in the PFC, and CA1 and GRs in the CA1, with no effect on BLA downregulation of CB1r and GRs. Shock and SRs caused lasting (1 week) alterations in emotional processing associated with changes in GR and CB1r expression in brain areas related to PTSD. WIN55,212-2 administered after trauma exposure prevented these alterations via PFC- and CA1-CB1r and CA1-GRs.     

Chronic exposure to cannabinoids before an emotional trauma may have negative effects on emotional function

Chronic direct activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors (CB1r) may lead to downregulation of CB1r which may in turn result in a depression-like phenotype in certain individuals.We examined the effects of chronic cannabinoid receptor activation before exposure to an emotional traumatic event on CB1r expression in the basolateral amygdala (BLA) and CA1 and on protracted anxiety- and depression-like behaviors. We used exposure to severe shock and situational reminders (SRs) in an inhibitory apparatus as a model for emotional trauma.Chronic treatment with the CB1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (1.2?mg/kg, i.p.) before shock exposure had differential effects on depression- and anxiety-like behavioral measures depending on withdrawal periods. In the 24?hrs withdrawal condition, WIN55,212–2 enhanced fear retrieval and impaired extinction, increased anhedonia and despair, but had a therapeutic effect in the startle test. In the 10 days withdrawal condition, WIN55,212–2 enhanced fear retrieval and impaired extinction without preventing the shock/SR-induced negative effects on anhedonia or startle response, but had a therapeutic effect in the despair test.Chronic treatment with WIN55,212–2 was found to down regulate CB1r protein levels in the BLA in the 10 days withdrawal condition, and to upregulate CB1r protein levels in the 24?hrs condition. In the CA1, rats chronically injected with vehicle or WIN55,212–2 demonstrated downregulation of CB1r protein levels.Chronic exposure to cannabinoids prior to an emotional trauma may have deleterious effects on emotional function suggesting that direct CB1/2 receptor activation may not be an optimal way to manipulate the endocannabinoid system in stressful individuals.     

Cannabinoids and Glucocorticoids in the Basolateral Amygdala Modulate Hippocampal–Accumbens Plasticity After Stress

Acute stress results in release of glucocorticoids, which are potent modulators of learning and plasticity. This process is presumably mediated by the basolateral amygdala (BLA) where cannabinoids CB1 receptors have a key role in regulating the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis. Growing attention has been focused on nucleus accumbens (NAc) plasticity, which regulates mood and motivation. The NAc integrates affective and context-dependent input from the BLA and ventral subiculum (vSub), respectively. As our previous data suggest that the CB1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist RU-38486 (RU) can prevent the effects of stress on emotional memory, we examined whether intra-BLA WIN and RU can reverse the effects of acute stress on NAc plasticity. Bilateral, ipsilateral, and contralateral BLA administration of RU or WIN reversed the stress-induced impairment in vSub–NAc long-term potentiation (LTP) and the decrease in cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) activity in the NAc. BLA CB1 receptors were found to mediate the preventing effects of WIN on plasticity, but not the preventing effects of RU, after stress. Inactivating the ipsilateral BLA, but not the contralateral BLA, impaired LTP. The possible mechanisms underlying the effects of BLA on NAc plasticity are discussed; the data suggest that BLA-induced changes in the NAc may be mediated through neural pathways in the brain''s stress circuit rather than peripheral pathways. The results suggest that glucocorticoid and cannabinoid systems in the BLA can restore normal function of the NAc and hence may have a central role in the treatment of a variety of stress-related disorders.     

Cannabinoids Ameliorate Impairments Induced by Chronic Stress to Synaptic Plasticity and Short-Term Memory

Repeated stress is one of the environmental factors that precipitates and exacerbates mental illnesses like depression and anxiety as well as cognitive impairments. We have previously shown that cannabinoids can prevent the effects of acute stress on learning and memory. Here we aimed to find whether chronic cannabinoid treatment would alleviate the long-term effects of exposure to chronic restraint stress on memory and plasticity as well as on behavioral and neuroendocrine measures of anxiety and depression. Late adolescent rats were exposed to chronic restraint stress for 2 weeks followed each day by systemic treatment with vehicle or with the CB1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (1.2 mg/kg). Thirty days after the last exposure to stress, rats demonstrated impaired long-term potentiation (LTP) in the ventral subiculum-nucleus accumbens (NAc) pathway, impaired performance in the prefrontal cortex (PFC)-dependent object-recognition task and the hippocampal-dependent spatial version of this task, increased anxiety levels, and significantly reduced expression of glucocorticoid receptors (GRs) in the amygdala, hippocampus, PFC, and NAc. Chronic WIN55,212-2 administration prevented the stress-induced impairment in LTP levels and in the spatial task, with no effect on stress-induced alterations in unconditioned anxiety levels or GR levels. The CB1 antagonist AM251 (0.3 mg/kg) prevented the ameliorating effects of WIN55,212-2 on LTP and short-term memory. Hence, the beneficial effects of WIN55,212-2 on memory and plasticity are mediated by CB1 receptors and are not mediated by alterations in GR levels in the brain areas tested. Our findings suggest that cannabinoid receptor activation could represent a novel approach to the treatment of cognitive deficits that accompany a variety of stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders.     

Stimulation of voluntary ethanol intake by cannabinoid receptor agonists in ethanol-preferring sP rats

RATIONALE: Recent studies have shown that the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716, is capable of reducing voluntary ethanol intake in rodents, suggesting the involvement of the CB1 receptor in the neural circuitry mediating the positive reinforcing properties of ethanol. OBJECTIVES: The present study extended to the agonists the investigation on the pharmacological manipulation of ethanol intake by cannabinoid agents. METHODS: Selectively bred, Sardinian alcohol-preferring (sP) rats were offered ethanol and water under the two-bottle free choice procedure with unlimited access for 24 h/day. RESULTS: The acute administration of WIN 55,212-2 (0.5-2 mg/kg; IP) and CP 55,940 (3-30 microg/kg; IP) induced a significant, dose-dependent increase in ethanol intake. Conversely, water consumption and intake of regular food and a highly palatable sucrose solution were not affected by treatment with WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940. The stimulatory effect of WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 on ethanol intake was completely prevented by administration of SR 141716 (0.3 mg/kg; IP) and the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (0.1 mg/kg; IP). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 promoted voluntary ethanol intake in sP rats. This effect was mediated by stimulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor and required the activation of the endogenous opioid system. The results of the present study add further support to the hypothesis that the cannabinoid CB1 receptor is part of the neural substrate regulating ethanol intake. These results are also discussed in terms of WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940 administration possibly fixing to a higher level the hedonic set-point mechanism regulating ethanol drinking behavior in sP rats.     

Cannabinoids Prevent the Development of Behavioral and Endocrine Alterations in a Rat Model of Intense Stress

Cannabinoids have recently emerged as a possible treatment of stress- and anxiety-related disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Here, we examined whether cannabinoid receptor activation could prevent the effects of traumatic stress on the development of behavioral and neuroendocrine measures in a rat model of PTSD, the single-prolonged stress (SPS) model. Rats were injected with the CB1/CB2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (WIN) systemically or into the basolateral amygdala (BLA) at different time points following SPS exposure and were tested 1 week later for inhibitory avoidance (IA) conditioning and extinction, acoustic startle response (ASR), hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function, and anxiety levels. Exposure to SPS enhanced conditioned avoidance and impaired extinction while enhancing ASR, negative feedback on the HPA axis, and anxiety. WIN (0.5 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally 2 or 24 h (but not 48 h) after SPS prevented the trauma-induced alterations in IA conditioning and extinction, ASR potentiation, and HPA axis inhibition. WIN microinjected into the BLA (5 μg/side) prevented SPS-induced alterations in IA and ASR. These effects were blocked by intra-BLA co-administration of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (0.3 ng/side), suggesting the involvement of CB1 receptors. These findings suggest that (i) there may be an optimal time window for intervention treatment with cannabinoids after exposure to a highly stressful event, (ii) some of the preventive effects induced by WIN are mediated by an activation of CB1 receptors in the BLA, and (iii) cannabinoids could serve as a pharmacological treatment of stress- and trauma-related disorders.     

Cannabinoid CB1-mediated inhibition of stress-induced gastric ulcers in rats

The effect of cannabinoid drugs (i.p.) on cold/restraint stress-induced gastric ulcers was studied in rats. The cannabinoid receptor agonist (WIN 55,212-2, 0.1-1 mg/kg), but not the less active isomer WIN 55,212-3 (1 mg/kg), reduced gastric ulceration. The protective effect of WIN 55,212-2 (1 mg/kg) was counteracted by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A, but not by the cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528. These results indicate that the antiulcer effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 is mediated by cannabinoid CB1 receptors.     

Inhibitory effect of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 on pentagastrin-induced gastric acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat

The effect of the cannabinoid (CB) receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 on gastric acid secretion was studied in the anaesthetized rat after stimulation with pentagastrin. WIN 55,212-2 (0.5-2 mg/kg, i.v.) was inactive on basal secretion but caused a marked inhibition (80%) of the acid secretion stimulated by pentagastrin (10 microg/kg, i.v.). The enantiomer WIN 55,212-3 (1-3 mg/kg, i.v.) did not significantly modify basal or pentagastrin-induced acid secretion. The inhibitory effect of WIN 55,212-2 against pentagastrin was prevented by the administration of the selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists SR141716A (1 mg/kg, i.v.) and LY320135 (1 mg/kg, i.v.); by contrast, the CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528 (0.3-1 mg/kg, i.v.) was without effect. The selective CB2 receptor agonist JWH-015 (0.1-10 mg/kg, i.v.) was inactive on the increase of acid output stimulated by pentagastrin. These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of WIN 55,212-2 on pentagastrin-stimulated acid secretion in the anaesthetized rat is mediated by specific cannabinoid receptors. Moreover, the antagonism of WIN 55,212-2-induced effects by the selective CB1 receptor antagonists SR141716A and LY320135 together with the ineffectiveness of both the CB2 receptor agonist JWH-015 and the CB2 receptor antagonist SR144528 indicate that CB1 receptor subtypes are predominantly involved in the antisecretory effect of WIN 55,212-2.     

CB1 receptor-dependent and -independent inhibition of excitatory postsynaptic currents in the hippocampus by WIN 55,212-2

We investigated the effect of a synthetic cannabinoid, WIN 55,212-2 on excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by stimulation of Schaffer collaterals in CA1 pyramidal cells. Bath application of WIN 55,212-2 reduced the amplitude of EPSCs in dose-dependent manner tested between 0.01 nM and 30 microM. In rats and mice, this cannabinoid ligand inhibited excitatory synapses in two steps at the nM and muM concentrations. When the function of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors (CB(1)R) was impaired, either by the application of a CB(1)R antagonist AM251, or by using CB(1)R knockout mice, WIN 55,212-2 in microM concentrations could still significantly reduced the amplitude of EPSCs. WIN 55,212-2 likely affected the efficacy of excitatory transmission only at presynaptic sites, since both at low and high doses the paired pulse ratio of EPSC amplitude was significantly increased. The inactive enantiomer, WIN 55,212-3, mimicked the effect of WIN 55,212-2 applied in high doses. In further experiments we found that the CB(1)R-independent effect of 10 microM WIN 55,212-2 at glutamatergic synapses was fully abolished, when slices were pre-treated with omega-conotoxin GVIA, but not with omega-agatoxin IVA. These data suggest that, in the hippocampus, WIN 55,212-2 reduces glutamate release from Schaffer collaterals solely via CB(1)Rs in the nM concentration range, whereas in microM concentrations, WIN 55,212-2 suppresses excitatory transmission, in addition to activation of CB(1)Rs, by directly blocking N-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels independent of CB(1)Rs.     

Chronic treatment with URB597 ameliorates post-stress symptoms in a rat model of PTSD

Activating the endocannabinoid system has become a major focus in the search for novel therapeutics for anxiety and deficits in fear extinction, two defining features of PTSD. We examined whether chronic treatment with the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor URB597 (0.2, 0.3, 0.4?mg/kg, i.p.) or the CB1/2 receptor agonist WIN55,212-2 (0.25, 0.5?mg/kg, i.p.) injected for 3 weeks to rats exposed to the shock and reminders model of PTSD would attenuate post-stress symptoms and affect basolateral amygdala (BLA) and CA1 CB1 receptors. Exposure to shock and reminders enhanced acoustic startle response and impaired extinction. Rats exposed to shock and reminders and chronically treated with URB597 demonstrated normalized startle response and intact extinction kinetics. WIN55,212-2 only affected the startle response. The therapeutic effects of URB597 and WIN55,212-2 were found to be CB1 receptor dependent, as these effects were blocked when a low dose of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (0.3?mg/kg, i.p. for 3 weeks) was co-administered. Moreover, URB597, but not WIN55,212-2, normalized the shock/reminders-induced upregulation in CB1 receptor levels in the BLA and CA1. One hour after the shock, N-arachidonoylethanolamine (AEA) was increased in the BLA and decreased in the CA1. Circulating 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) concentrations were decreased in shocked rats, with no significant effect in the BLA or CA1. FAAH activity was increased in the CA1 of shocked rats. Chronic cannabinoid treatment with URB597 can ameliorate PTSD-like symptoms suggesting FAAH inhibitors as a potentially effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of disorders associated with inefficient fear coping.     

Central mediation of the cannabinoid cue: activity of a selective CB1 antagonist, SR 141716A

Active cannabimimetic drugs are known to bind to two receptor subtypes: one, called CB1, is mainly localised in the central nervous system while the other (CB2) is expressed preferentially in the immune system. SR 141716A has been demonstrated to have a nanomolar affinity for CB1 receptor subtypes and a micromolar affinity for CB2 receptors. Moreover, it is an effective antagonist at these receptors both in vitro (antagonism of cannabinoid activity in vas deferens) and in vivo (suppression of the hypothermia elicited by WIN 55,212-2). The present experiments were thus undertaken to investigate the role of CB1 receptors in cannabinoid discrimination. Rats were trained to discriminate WIN 55,212-2 (0.3mg/kg s.c.) from saline in a standard operant (FR10) food rewarded discrimination procedure. Acquisition of the discrimination required 16 days on average and the ED(50) of WIN 55,212-2 was 0.032mg/kg s.c. CP55,940 and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) generalised to the WIN 55,212-2 stimulus with the respective ED(50)s of 0.007mg/kg (s.c.) and 0.64mg/kg (p.o.). Pretreatment with SR 141716A antagonised the cue elicited by WIN 55,212-2 (ED(50) = 1.6mg/kg) as well as the generalisation to CP 55,940 (ED(50) = 0.08mg/kg) and to Delta(9)-THC (ED(50) = 0.15mg/kg). SR 140098 is a CB1 antagonist as potent as SR 141716A in vitro. This compound is unlikely to pass into the brain since it failed to displace [(3)H]-CP55, 940 from rat brain membranes ex vivo, and to reverse WIN 55,212-2-induced hypothermia. SR 140098, in contrast to SR 141716A, did not antagonise the WIN 55,212-2 stimulus. Taken together, the present results demonstrate that the brain CB1 receptor subtype mediates the cannabinoid cue.     

Centrally mediated antinociceptive effects of cannabinoid receptor ligands in rat models of nociception

The endogenous nonapeptide hemopressin (HE) demonstrates potent block of the cannabinoid subtype-1 (CB1) receptor in vitro and robust antinociception in vivo. The current study evaluated the effects of centrally administered HE in mechanistically distinct pre-clinical rat models of pain—the hot plate test and the hind paw formalin test. The non-subtype selective CB receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 was tested concurrently as a positive control. In the hot plate test, neither intrathecal (i.t.) HE nor WIN 55,212-2 significantly altered the latency to respond to noxious heat. By contrast, i.t. HE and WIN 55,212-2 significantly reduced pain-related behaviors in the formalin test. Possible HE functionality as a CB1 receptor antagonist at the spinal level was evaluated in the formalin test. Intrathecal pretreatment with HE did not attenuate the antinociceptive effect of i.t. WIN 55,212-2. However, pretreatment with the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant did; i.t. rimonabant pretreatment was not antinociceptive. Potential supraspinal antinociceptive activity of HE was also evaluated. Whereas intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of WIN 55,212-2 reduced pain-related behaviors in the formalin test, interestingly, i.c.v. HE increased behaviors. In the current study, an antinociceptive effect with the CB receptor ligand HE was obtained under the specific condition of tissue injury and not in the uninjured state. Thus, HE could be a useful analgesic peptide with a novel spinal mechanism of action.     

Intravenous self-administration of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 in rats

RATIONALE: Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC), the main psychoactive ingredient of marijuana, as well as synthetic cannabinoid (CB1) receptor agonists, has led to negative or equivocal results when tested with the intravenous self-administration procedure, the best validated behavioural model for evaluating abuse liability of drugs in experimental animals. We recently reported, however, that the synthetic CB1 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 is intravenously self-administered by drug-naive mice and that its self-administration is blocked by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A. OBJECTIVE: To assess a reliable model of cannabinoid intravenous self-administration in rats. Long Evans male rats were allowed the opportunity to self-administer WIN 55,212-2 at doses ranging from 6.25 to 50 microg/kg per injection, under a fixed-ratio 1 (FR1) schedule of reinforcement and nose-pokes as the operant responses. The effect of either a change in the unit drug dose available or a pretreatment with the specific CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A were then investigated (maintenance phase). Finally, the extinction of the self-administration behaviour was evaluated. RESULTS: Response rate depended on the drug dose available, with maximum rates occurring at 12.5 microg/kg per injection. Response rate increased following pretreatment with the specific CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716A. Moreover, operant behaviour rapidly extinguished following both the substitution of saline or vehicle for cannabinoid and the disconnection of the drug delivery pumps. CONCLUSION: Rats will intravenously self-administer the synthetic CB1 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2 under specific experimental conditions, thus allowing further investigation of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying cannabinoid-taking behaviour.     

Continuous infusion of the cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 to the site of a peripheral nerve injury reduces mechanical and cold hypersensitivity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cannabinoids have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties but their use is limited by psychotropic activity at CNS receptors. Restricting cannabinoid delivery to peripheral tissues at systemically inactive doses offers a potential solution to this problem. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: WIN 55,212-2 was continuously delivered to the site of a partial ligation injury to the sciatic nerve via a perineural catheter connected to a mini-osmotic pump implanted at the time of injury. Bilateral reflex limb withdrawal behaviour was measured in adult male Wistar rats in response to mechanical and cooling stimulation of the hind paw. KEY RESULTS: Compared with vehicle treatment, WIN 55,212-2 (1.4 microg microl(-1) hr(-1)) reduced hypersensitivity to stimuli applied to the injured limb at 2, 4 and 6 days after injury. The effects of WIN 55,212-2 (0.6-2.8 microg microl(-1) hr(-1)) were dose-dependent. Estimated EC(50) values for reduction in mean responses to mechanical and cooling stimulation (day 4 post-surgery) were 1.55 (95% C.I, [1.11-2.16]) microg microl(-1) hr(-1) and 1.52 (95% C.I, [1.07-2.18]) microg microl(-1) hr(-1), respectively. When delivered to the contralateral side to injury, WIN 55,212-2 (1.4 or 2.8 microg microl(-1) hr(-1)) did not significantly affect nerve injury-associated hypersensitivity. Co-perineural application of a CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716a and WIN 55,212-2 prevented the effects of WIN 55,212-2 on hypersensitivity. Co-application of CB(2) receptor antagonist SR144528 reversed WIN 55,212-2's effect on mechanical hypersensitivity on day 2 only. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data support a peripheral antihyperalgesic effect of WIN 55,212-2 when delivered directly to the site of a nerve injury at systemically inactive doses.     

The synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212-2 attenuates hyperalgesia and allodynia in a rat model of neuropathic pain

The analgesic properties of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN55,212-2 were investigated in a model of neuropathic pain. In male Wistar rats, bilateral hind limb withdrawal thresholds to cold, mechanical and noxious thermal stimuli were measured. Following this, unilateral L5 spinal nerve ligation was performed. Seven days later, sensory thresholds were reassessed and the development of allodynia to cold and mechanical stimuli and hyperalgesia to a noxious thermal stimulus confirmed. The effect of WIN55,212-2 (0.1 - 5.0 mg kg(-1), i.p.) on the signs of neuropathy was then determined; there was a dose related reversal of all three signs of painful neuropathy at doses which did not generally alter sensory thresholds in the contralateral unligated limb. This effect was prevented by co-administration of the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716a, but not by co-administration of the CB(2) receptor antagonist SR144528, suggesting this action of WIN55,212-2 is mediated via the CB(1) receptor. Administration of SR141716a alone had no affect on the observed allodynia and hyperalgesia, which does not support the concept of an endogenous analgesic tone. These data indicate that cannabinoids may have therapeutic potential in neuropathic pain, and that this effect is mediated through the CB(1) receptor.     

Effect of the cannabinoid receptor ligand, WIN 55,212-2, on superoxide anion and TNF-alpha production by human mononuclear cells

Cannabinoids are known to downregulate immune response but the role for cannabinoid receptors in cannabinoid-induced immunosuppression is still unclear. To address this question, the interference of CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonists with the inhibition of TNF-alpha production by synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 was studied using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in vitro. CB2 (SR 144528) but not CB1 (SR 141716A) receptor antagonist dose dependently interfered with WIN 55,212-2-induced inhibition of TNF-alpha synthesis. Also, WIN 55,212-2 decreased fMLP-induced reactive oxygen species generation in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-primed PBMC. However, the high concentrations of cannabinoid receptor ligands needed to achieve significant effects suggest that the observed effects may be in part cannabinoid receptor independent.     

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of acetylcholine release in the brain of NMRI, CD-1 and C57BL/6J mice

Cannabinoid CB1 receptors occur as presynaptic receptors producing inhibition of neurotransmitter release. To elucidate their physiological role, experiments on tissues from CB1 receptor knockout mice would be helpful. We studied whether CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of acetylcholine release is detectable in the brain of NMRI mice and of CD-1 and C57BL/6J mice (the latter two strains representing the wild-type strains of the two CB1 receptor knockout mouse models). Brain slices preincubated with [3H]choline were superfused and tritium overflow was evoked electrically (3 Hz) or by introduction of Ca2+ into Ca2+-free K+-rich medium (35 mM) containing tetrodotoxin. The eletrically evoked tritium overflow from NMRI mouse hippocampal slices was inhibited (maximally by 60%) by the cannabinoid receptor agonists CP-55,940 and WIN 55,212-2 but not affected by WIN 55,212-3 (the inactive enantiomer of WIN 55,212-2; pEC50=7.9, 7.4 and <5.5). The concentration-response curve of WIN 55,212-2 was shifted to the right by the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716 (apparent pA2=8.6). Compared to hippocampal slices from NMRI mice, WIN 55,212-2 1 microM inhibited the electrically evoked overflow (1) from cortical slices from NMRI mice to a lesser extent and from striatal slices not at all, (2) from hippocampal slices from CD-1 and C57BL/6J mice to an identical extent and (3) from hippocampal slices from Sprague-Dawley rats to at least the same extent. SR 141716 0.32 microM abolished the effect of WIN 55,212-2 1 microM in hippocampal slices from NMRI, CD-1 and C57BL/6J mice and in cortical slices from NMRI mice. The electrically evoked tritium overflow from NMRI mouse hippocampal slices was also inhibited by the muscarinic receptor agonist oxotremorine (maximum effect of 85%; pEC50=6.5) and this effect was antagonized by the muscarinic receptor antagonist AF-DX 384 (apparent pA2=8.3). The Ca2+-evoked tritium overflow from NMRI mouse hippocampal slices was inhibited by WIN 55,212-2 in a manner sensitive to SR 141716. In conclusion, the cholinergic axon terminals of the NMRI mouse hippocampus are endowed with presynaptic CB1 receptors. Such receptors are also detectable in the hippocampus of CD-1 and C57BL/6J mice. The maximum extent of the CB1 receptor-mediated inhibition of acetylcholine release is lower than the maximum effect mediated via the autoreceptor.     

Cannabinoids inhibit noradrenergic and purinergic sympathetic cotransmission in the rat isolated mesenteric arterial bed

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Noradrenaline and ATP are sympathetic co-transmitters. In the rat perfused mesenteric bed cannabinoids have been shown to modify the overall response to sympathetic nerve stimulation. This study has assessed whether cannabinoid receptor activation modulates differentially the noradrenergic and purinergic components of sympathetic vasoconstriction. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rat mesenteric beds were perfused with physiological salt solution and the effects of cannabinoids on responses to nerve stimulation, or exogenous noradrenaline or alpha,beta-methylene ATP (alpha,beta-meATP; P2X receptor agonist) were determined after raising tone with U46619. The effects of cannabinoids on the noradrenaline and ATP components of sympathetic neurotransmission were assessed using the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin, or after P2X receptor desensitization with alpha,beta-meATP. KEY RESULTS: Anandamide, WIN 55,212-2 and CP55,940 attenuated sympathetic neurogenic vasoconstrictor responses. The inhibitory actions of anandamide and WIN 55,212-2 were blocked by LY320135, a CB1 receptor antagonist, but not by SR144528, a CB2 receptor antagonist. The inhibitory actions of CP55,940 were unaffected by LY320135 and SR144528. WIN 55,212-3, the inactive S(-) enantiomer of WIN 55,212-2, had no effect on sympathetic neurogenic responses. None of the cannabinoids affected contractile responses to exogenous noradrenaline or alpha,beta-meATP. Anandamide and WIN 55,212-2 inhibited both the noradrenaline and ATP components of the sympathetic neurogenic contractile responses, with effects on the ATP component being most marked. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results indicate that prejunctional CB1-like receptors mediate the sympathoinhibitory action of anandamide and WIN 55,212-2, but not CP55,940, in the rat mesenteric bed. Cannabinoids inhibit both the noradrenergic and purinergic components of sympathetic neurotransmission.     

The synthetic cannabinoids attenuate allodynia and hyperalgesia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain

Trigeminal neuralgia is a disorder of paroxysmal and severely disabling facial pain and continues to be a real therapeutic challenge. At present there are few effective drugs. Here we have evaluated the effects of the synthetic cannabinoid WIN 55,212-2 on mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia in a rat model of trigeminal neuropathic pain produced by a chronic constriction injury (CCI) of the infraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve (ION). Relative to sham operation controls, rats with the CCI-ION consistently displayed hyperresponsiveness to von Frey filament and heat stimulation of the vibrissal pad. Both mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia are seen both ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of nerve injury, but is significantly more severe ipsilaterally. Administration of WIN 55,212-2 (0.3-5 mg/kg i.p.) dose-dependently increased the mechanical and heat withdrawal thresholds. WIN 55,212-2 (0.3-3 mg/kg i.p.) produced no significant motor deficits in animals using the rotarod test. The effect of WIN 55,212-2 was mimicked by cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist HU 210 and was antagonized by CB1 receptor antagonist AM 251, but not by CB2 receptor antagonist AM 630 or vanilloid receptor 1 antagonist capsazepine, suggesting the involvement of CB1 receptors. CCI-ION also induced a time-dependent upregulation of CB1 receptors primarily within the ipsilateral superficial laminae of the trigeminal caudal nucleus revealed by both Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Taken together, these results suggest that cannabinoids may be a useful therapeutic approach for the clinical management of trigeminal neuropathic pain disorders.