Anal sphincter function after intersphincteric resection and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

This study was done to determine the effect of the direct ileal pouch-anal anastomosis upon pressure and sensory components of the anal canal and ileal pouch. These findings were related to postoperative continence. Thirty-three patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (25 continent, eight with episodic minor incontinence) were studied 3±0.3 and 25±5 months after ileostomy takedown. The maximum resting pressure in the anal canal was significantly lower in patients with an imperfect result (35±5 mm Hg) than in continent patients (44±5 mm Hg) (P<0.05). Postoperatively the maximum squeeze anal pressure was slightly greater in continent than in incontinent patients (99±8 mm Hg vs.87±7 mm Hg) (P>0.05). The postoperative recto-(ileo-)anal inhibitory reflex was present in 27 percent. The linear correlation between strength of rectal (ileal) distension and depth resp. duration of internal sphincter relaxation as preoperatively observed disappeared postoperatively in every group of patients. Simultaneous measurements of pouch and anal pressure in patients with imperfect results revealed a reduced positive pouch anal pressure gradient compared to the continent group. This low pouch-anal pressure gradient is thought to be responsible for the increased incidence of soiling in some of our patients.     

Rediversion after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to understand better the cause and predictability of pouch failure requiring rediversion after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and to assess the ultimate outcome of patients in a large ileal pouch series who required rediversion. METHODS: Data from 460 patients completing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis at one institution were recorded from both a prospectively accumulated ileal pouch registry and patient medical records. RESULTS: Of 460 patients, 21 (4.6 percent) who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis required rediversion. Five of these patients subsequently had successful restoration of pouch continuity, leaving a permanent failure rate of 16 of 460 patients (3.5 percent). The most common reasons for rediversion were pouch fistula formation (12) and poor functional results (5). Preoperative factors, including age, previous colectomy, and indication for colectomy, did not predict eventual need for rediversion. Patients requiring rediversion had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications (95 vs.43 percent;P <0.001). Specifically, this group had a higher rate of postoperative pouch fistula (57 vs.3.4 percent;P <0.001). Additionally, a final diagnosis of Crohn's disease significantly predicted the need for rediversion. Permanent pouch failure occurred in 36.8 percent of patients with a final diagnosis of Crohn's disease compared with 1.4 percent of patients with a final diagnosis of ulcerative colitis ( P <0.001). All five salvaged patients had fistula formation in the absence of Crohn's disease. CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of permanent pouch failure is low. The majority of failures were related to fistula formation associated with Crohn's disease or poor functional results. Pouches complicated by fistulas not associated with Crohn's disease can be salvaged with temporary rediversion.Read in part at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, May 2 to 7, 1993.     

Delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

In patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC), ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) can be performed either at the time of colectomy or as a delayed procedure after total abdominal colectomy and ileostomy. There has been debate as to whether delayed IPAA results in superior functional results, since patients are frequently steroid-free and have little evidence of active disease. To assess this, we analyzed 95 patients who had undergone total abdominal colectomy, either with ileostomy and Hartmann's procedure or with ileorectostomy, 2–183 months prior to IPAA. Postoperative complications and functional results were compared with those of 776 CUC patients who underwent IPAA at the time of abdominal colectomy. Indications for prior colectomy included toxic megacolon (40 percent), failed medical therapy (36 percent), other reasons (e.g.,iatrogenic perforation, cancer) (6 percent), and reasons unclear (18 percent). Nineteen percent of delayed-IPAA patients were taking steroids at the time of pouch construction. Follow-ups were similar in the two groups. The incidence of septic and obstructive complications after delayed IPAA vs. IPAA at the time of colectomy were 10.5 percent vs.5.4 percent and 6.5 percent vs.14.5 percent, respectively. There were no significant differences in postoperative functional results between the two groups. Delayed IPAA confers no advantage over IPAA performed at the time of colectomy in terms of functional outcome. Delayed IPAA was associated with a significantly higher rate of septic complications but a lower incidence of postoperative obstruction.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.     

Alteration in intestinal permeability after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PPURPOSE: The physiologic changes that occur when the small bowel is used as a reservoir, as in the ileal pouchanal anastomosis, are poorly understood. Alterations in bowel permeability, which may lead to bacterial translocation that could result in illness or dysfunction of the pouch, may be one such consequence of the pouch procedure. METHODS: Whole-bowel permeability was evaluated in patients with and without the pouch through the use of an orally consumed nonmetabolizable sugar clearance technique. Patients in whom the ileal pouchanal anastomosis was performed for ulcerative colitis (17 patients) and patients with familial polyposis (7 patients) were compared with normal healthy volunteers (10 patients) and patients with ulcerative colitis with and without curative colectomy and ileostomy (6 and 5 patients, respectively). RESULTS: Measured by this technique, no differences were noted in bowel permeability between the volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis, even after colectomy and ileostomy (1.7±0.4 in normal healthy volunteers, 1.8±0.5 in patients with ulcerative colitis without stoma, and 1.4±0.2 in patients with ulcerative colitis with ileostomy). The group of patients with an ileal reservoir, however, had a significantly increased index of measured bowel permeability (3.5±0.5 in patients with ulcerative colitis and 5.1±0.7 in patients with familial polyposis; P<0.05 by analysis of variance compared with normal healthy volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis with or without ileostomy). CONCLUSION: The exact site, cause, and consequence of this possible alteration of bowel permeability are unclear but appear to be related to the presence of the pouch and are not caused by the underlying pathologic diagnosis.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, May 12 to 17, 1991. Winner of the New Jersey Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Award, 1991.     

Lymphoma of the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

The most common cause of pouch dysfunction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is pouchitis. Although low-grade dysplasia in the mucosa of the pouch has been recently described in the presence of pouchitis, there has been no report of carcinoma arising in the pouch itself. We describe a patient who developed a large-cell lymphoma of the ileal pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.     

Safety of urgent restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for fulminant colitis

PURPOSE: Subtotal colectomy with ileostomy is the operation of choice for patients with fulminant colitis. Restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is preferred for patients who undergo elective surgery for ulcerative colitis. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of RPC with IPAA in patients with a moderate form of fulminant colitis. METHODS: A chart review of 737 patients who underwent RPC with IPAA for ulcerative and indeterminate colitis from 1983 through 1992 was performed. Moderate fulminant colitis was defined as acute disease requiring hospitalization and parenteral steroid therapy, but without hypotension (systolic blood pressure, <100 mmHg), tachycardia (>120 beats/min), or megacolon. RESULTS: Twelve patients with moderate fulminant colitis underwent urgent surgery (1.6 percent). They had been treated preoperatively for 5.1±2.3 days with intravenous high-dose steroids, total parenteral nutrition, and antibiotics. These patients had a shorter length of disease ( P =0.01), lower hemoglobin, hematocrit, and albumin (P=0.001), and higher temperature (P=0.002) and leukocyte count (P=0.007) than patients undergoing elective surgery. No early septic complications occurred, although perianal abscess occurred in one patient and pouch-anal fistula in another patient, 13 and 14 months after surgery, respectively. CONCLUSION: In carefully selected, hemodynamically stable patients with fulminant colitis and without megacolon, RPC with IPAA can be safely performed.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, May 8 to 13, 1994.     

Consequences of delayed ileostomy closure after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Temporary diverting loop ileostomy is a generally accepted component of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) procedure. Ileostomy closure is usually performed within two to three months but may be delayed because of disruption of the ileoanal anastomosis, suspected leak from the ileal reservoir, concomitant medical problems, or patient convenience. Of 362 patients undergoing IPAA at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation for inflammatory bowel disease, 10 have had their ileostomy closures delayed for more than six months. Clinical and manometric parameters are examined in these patients and compared with those who had earlier closure. There appears to be no significant difference in the functional outcome of IPAA in these patients in terms of number of bowel movements and degree of continence. Reservoir compliance and maximum tolerated volumes are similar. We conclude that delaying ileostomy closure for more than six months after IPAA has no deleterious effect on pouch function.     

Carcinoma and the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Of 362 patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 12 (five with chronic ulcerative colitis and seven with familial adenomatous polyposis) had 16 associated carcinomas. Incidental carcinoma was found in four patients who had undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, six patients had known carcinoma, and carcinoma was suspected in two patients with high-grade dysplasia. No tumor was Stage C or D. After a median observation period of 24 months, no evidence of recurrence was documented. Data suggest that patients with carcinoma complicating chronic ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis can safely undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis; however, it may be prudent to perform resection and later ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after a period of observation and appropriate adjuvant therapy because of the difficulty in intraoperative staging.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.     

Obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A preventable complication?

Small bowel obstruction is a common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. This review of 460 patients examines the frequency of small bowel obstruction and determines potential risk factors. The leading indication for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was ulcerative colitis (83 percent). In 142 patients (31 percent), loop ileostomy was rotated 180° to facilitate emptying of the ileostomy. Ninety-four patients (20 percent) had 109 episodes of obstruction. Obstruction occurred after creation of the pouch (40 episodes), closure of the ileostomy (29 episodes), or developed during the subsequent followup period (40 episodes). Operative intervention was required in 39 percent of the episodes (7 percent of all patients). At operation, the most common point of obstruction was at closure of the ileostomy (n=22/42, 52 percent). In 16 of these patients, the ileostomy had been rotated. Multiple risk factors, including age, sex, primary diagnosis, surgeon incidence, pouch type, prior colectomy, steroid usage, stomal rotation, technique of closure of the ileostomy, and prior obstruction, were examined by univariate and multivariate analysis. Of all factors, only stomal rotation was statistically significant (P = 0.0005, chi-squared analysis). Rotation of the loop ileostomy during ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, although an apparent technical refinement, is unnecessary and predisposes to obstruction.Dr. Marcello was supported by a grant from the Eleanor Naylor Dana Charitable Trust, New York, New York.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 7 to 12, 1992.     

Indeterminate colitis predisposes to perineal complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

This study retrospectively evaluated 288 patients who had undergone ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to determine the incidence of perineal complications and to relate these findings to the pathologic diagnosis, with the goal of specifically clarifying the appropriate surgical management of patients with indeterminate colitis. Of these 288 patients, 235 patients (82 percent) had a diagnosis of chronic ulcerative colitis, 18 patients (6 percent) had indeterminate colitis, 6 patients (2 percent) had Crohn's disease, and 29 patients (10 percent) had familial polyposis. All complications occurred at least 6 months after closure of the stoma and required operative therapy. Of 18 patients with indeterminate colitis, 9 patients experienced complications (50 percent) vs. 8 of 235 patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (3 percent), a highly significant difference (P <0.001). Furthermore, the risk of eventual ileostomy because of perineal complications was 0.4 percent in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis vs. 28 percent in patients with indeterminate colitis (P< 0.001). We conclude that a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis predisposes the patient undergoing ileal pouchanal anastomosis to perineal complications, with a resultant high chance of reservoir loss. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should be considered with caution in the patient with a diagnosis of indeterminate colitis.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.     

Afferent limb obstruction complicating ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Small-bowel obstruction is a common complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Acute angulation of the afferent limb at the pouch inlet is the cause of obstruction in a subset of patients requiring laparotomy. METHODS: Patients were identified from the Lahey Clinic ileoanal pouch registry, a prospective computerized database of all patients who have undergone IPAA since 1980. Records of patients who were identified as having afferent limb obstruction as a cause of bowel obstruction after IPAA were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 567 patients had undergone total proctocolectomy and ileoanal J-pouch at time of the study. Of 122 patients with one or more episodes of obstruction after IPAA, 48 required operative intervention. Afferent limb obstruction was identified as the cause of obstruction in six patients (12 percent). The most common presentation was recurrent partial obstruction (4 of 6 patients). Contrast small-bowel series and enemas were suggestive of obstruction in four of six patients, the most consistent radiographic finding being small-bowel dilation to the level of the pouch inlet. All patients underwent laparotomy for unresolved obstruction. Intraoperatively, the afferent limb was found to be adherent posterior to the pouch, causing acute angulation at the pouch inlet. Rather than risk injury to the pouch or its mesentery, the obstruction was bypassed by side-to-side anastomosis of the afferent limb to the pouch (enteroenterostomy) in five of six patients. One patient underwent ileostomy only because of technical considerations. Two patients required re-exploration and pexy of the afferent limb to the pelvic sidewall (pouchopexy) to relieve recurrent afferent limb obstruction. CONCLUSION: Afferent limb obstruction should be suspected in patients with recurrent obstruction after IPAA. Bypass of the obstructed segment from distal ileum to the pouch is safe and effective treatment. Because of the risk of recurrent afferent limb angulation, concurrent pouchopexy should be considered.Poster presentation at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Consequences of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn's colitis

Patients with Crohn's colitis are generally not considered candidates for the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). procedure. We reviewed 362 consecutive patients undergoing IPAA and analyzed the outcome of this procedure on 25 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of mucosal ulcerative colitis who were subsequently proven to have Crohn's disease. The mean follow-up was 38.1 months. Sixteen patients have a functioning pouch, seven have required pouch excision, one is diverted, and one has died. Only one of nine patients in whom there was a preoperative clinical feature suggestive of Crohn's disease has a functioning pouch, with complications uniformly occurring within months of ileostomy closure. In contrast, 15 of 16 patients without preoperative features of Crohn's disease have maintained their pouch, generally with good results. These data suggest that patients in whom there is clinical and pathologic evidence of Crohn's disease do very poorly without meaningful symptom-free intervals. However, patients without any clinical features of Crohn's disease, despite a histopathologic diagnosis of Crohn's colitis, have had a good outcome with IPAA thus far.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.     

Long-term causes of death following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify the overall long-term causes of death in a large series of patients who were undergoing proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). METHODS: Records of patients who underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA at the Mayo Clinic affiliated hospitals between January 1981 and October 1994 were reviewed to determine overall mortality, cause, and timing of death. RESULTS: A total of 1,603 patients underwent proctocolectomy with IPAA reconstruction (1,407 for chronic ulcerative colitis (CUC), 187 for familial polyposis (FAP), and 9 for other diagnoses). Thirty-two patients have died, with an overall mortality rate of 2 percent. Mean age at time of death was 40 (23–60) years. There was no significant difference in overall mortality between patients with CUC and patients with FAP. Three deaths occurred postoperatively (0.2 percent) because of pulmonary embolism, perforated gastric ulcer, and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Late deaths occurred in 29 patients (1.8 percent), 10 months to 10.4 years after the operation. The most common cause of late death was cancer, including colon and rectal carcinoma (10 patients), hematologic malignancies (4 patients), cholangiocarcinoma (3 patients), and germ-cell carcinoma (1 patient). Four patients died from unrelated sepsis, two died following myocardial infarction, two patients died from complications of subsequent orthopedic surgery, and one patient died of cirrhosis. Two additional patients committed suicide. No late deaths were directly attributable to the IPAA procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Proctocolectomy with IPAA is a safe procedure. Operative mortality is low, and late deaths are related to carcinogenic and extracolonic manifestations of underlying or unrelated coexisting diseases and events.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 7 to 12, 1995.     

Social and sexual function following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Patiens who undergo surgery for ulcerative colitis are usually young and active. When surgery becomes necessary, their future social and sexual function is of major concern. This study was performed to be able to give more detailed information of what is to be expected. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (26 men and 23 women) who underwent ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis between November 1983 and September 1986 in the authors' institution were personally interviewed regarding details of their preoperative and postoperative social and sexual functions. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent had reduced capacity to work preoperatively compared with 6 percent postoperatively. Thirty-one percent resumed work in the period with diverting ileostomy. Leisure time activities were reduced in 47 percent preoperatively, whereas 6 percent had limitations postoperatively. In 35 percent of women, frequency of intercourse was increased postoperatively, and none reported a decreased frequency. None of the women who were able to achieve orgasm preoperatively reported a postoperative disturbance of this ability, and 16 percent experienced an increased quality of orgasm. Postoperatively none reported dyspareunia, vaginal discharge, or changes in their menstrual cycle. Frequency of intercourse and ability to achieve orgasm remained unchanged for the majority of men; however, one developed erectile dysfunction, and one complained of retrograde ejaculation. Sexual activity in men was less affected by the presence of an ileostomy, and 69 percent had intercourse in the period with ileostomy compared with 30 percent of women. None of the patients complained of anal pain, soiling, or fecal leakage during intercourse, but one woman reported some discomfort from the pouch during intercourse. None of the patients wanted to return to a life with an ileostomy. CONCLUSION: The social and sexual function, quality of life, after ileal J-pouch anastomosis is improved when compared with the period with ulcerative colitis and the time with diverting ileostomy. In men, however, a frequency of sexual dysfunction similar to what is seen after proctectomy for benign diseases should be underlined.     

Influence of sleep on anal sphincteric pressure in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Fecal incontinence at night may be a disturbing consequence of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The hypothesis was that decreases in anal canal resting pressure occur as sleep deepens and that the decreases are more profound in pouch patients with incontinence than in controls. Using a sleeve catheter assembly for recording intraluminal anal canal pressure and polysomnographic recordings of sleep stages, progressive decreases in anal canal resting pressure with deepening sleep occurred in 11 healthy controls (mean±SEM: 57±3 mm Hg to 43 ±3 mm Hg: P <0.05) and in 11 patients after IPAA (55 ±3 mm Hg to 42±4 mm Hg;P <0.05). Minute-to-minute variations in mean pressure were also found in both controls and IPAA patients, and they were greater at night in patients ( P <0.05), except during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. In three patients, resting pressure during REM sleep decreased markedly to 31±8 mm Hg. This decrease plus the variations in pressure during REM sleep led to incontinence. In conclusion, decreases in anal resting pressure coupled with marked minute-to-minute variations in pressure during sleep occurred in controls and in patients after IPAA and, when profound, led to nocturnal fecal incontinence in some patients.Read in part at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, June 11 to 16, 1989.An abstract of this work has been published in Gastroenterology 1989;96:A378.Supported by U.S.P.H.S. NIH Grants RR585, DK18278, and DK34988 and by the Mayo Foundation.     

Surgical treatment and role of dynamic defecography in impaired evacuation after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis may develop impaired evacuation of the pouch. A new surgical approach and the role of dynamic defecography in such patients are highlighted. METHODS: Five patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were assessed clinically and with dynamic defecography before and after reoperation. RESULTS: In one patient an extensive approach with complete pouch mobilization, stenoplasty of a pouch outlet stenosis, shortening of the rectal remnant, and renewed pouch-anal anastomosis were needed; in three patients, a long and angulated efferent limb was shortened by transabdominal techniques (stenoplasty or a newly developed technique with a linear stapler), and in one patient a pouch inlet stenosis was corrected. In all patients, impaired emptying was cured; in all patients, obstructive abdominal pain improved considerably. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic defecography is indispensable for tailoring surgical treatment. Effective transabdominal shortening of the efferent limb can be performed with the aid of a linear stapler.     

Long-term results of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with Crohn's disease

PURPOSE: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for most patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Crohn's disease is, however, a contraindication. Because distinction between UC and Crohn's disease can be difficult, some patients with Crohn's disease inadvertently undergo IPAA. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term outcome of patients with Crohn's disease who have undergone IPAA. METHODS: A total of 37 patients (20 men) were studied. Each had undergone mucosectomy with handsewn IPAA (J-pouch, n=35; S-pouch, n=1; W-pouch, n=1). Histologic examination of the resected specimen at time of IPAA showed features of ulcerative colitis (n=22), indeterminate colitis (n=9), or Crohn's disease (n=6). The stoma was closed in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 11 of 37 patients developed complex fistulas (pouch-cutaneous (n=6), pouch-vaginal (n=4), or pouch-vesical (n=1). Crohn's disease has recurred in the pouch (n=20), anal canal (n=4), pouch and anal canal (n=10), and elsewhere (n=3). After ten years (range, 3–14), the pouch remains in situ in 20 patients in whom frequency of bowel movement is seven times (3–10)/24 hours,in situ but defunctioned in seven patients, and excised in ten patients (failure rate, 45 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Inadvertent IPAA for Crohn's disease is associated with a high rate of failure (45 percent) but an acceptable long-term functional result if the pouch can be kept in situ.Read at the meeting of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Glasgow, United Kingdom, May 22 to 24, 1996.     

Familial adenomatous polyposis: Results following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and ileorectostomy

To compare the clinical and functional results of ileorectostomy (IR) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), we reviewed the results of 94 IPAA patients and 21 IR patients who were operated upon between 1978 and 1988. The groups were similar with respect to age and sex. None of the patients died postoperatiyely. Postoperative complications occurred in 28 percent of the IPAA group and in 17 percent of the IR group (P >0.1). Seven percent of IPAA patients described symptoms compatible with pouchitis. Sixty-one percent of IR patients required subsequent fulguration of rectal polyps at least once. IR patients had a mean (±SD) of 4 (±2) stools per day, while IPAA patients had 5 (±2) stools per day (P >0.05). No significant difference in daytime soiling was present between IR (6 percent) and IPAA (4 percent). Nighttime spotting was also similar between the two groups. Nighttime soiling, however, was reported by 4 percent of IPAA patients but not by IR patients (P <0.05). One IPAA patient (1 percent) required pouch excision for a desmoid tumor, while two IR patients (11 percent) required proctectomy and ileostomy for recurrent dysplastic polyps (P <0.05). Adhesions and a shortened ileal mesentery prevented the construction of an ileoapal procedure in these latter patients. In conclusion, the postoperative complication rate and functional results are similar after IR and IPAA in patients with FAP; however, IR does not eradicate rectal polyps and may indeed preclude IPAA for those requiring subsequent proctectomy.Read in part at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, St. Louis, Missouri, April 29 to May 4, 1990.     

Superior mesenteric artery syndrome as a complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE: Duodenal compression by the superior mesenteric artery following total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is a rare occurrence. Previous surgical treatment involved duodenal division. The aim of this report was to describe a case with such a complication and to discuss an operative alternative. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: Mobilization of the duodenum from its retroperitoneal attachments, without transection and reanastomosis, allowed the free passage of gas through the duodenum and recovery for the patient. CONCLUSION: This case report suggests that a more conservative approach may be successful in managing this complication.Dr. Goes is supported at the University of Southern California by grants from the Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo-FAPESP, Brazil.     

Incidence,risk factors,and treatment of dysplasia in the anal transitional zone after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Preservation of the anal transitional zone (ATZ) after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis is controversial. PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and treatment options for dysplasia and/or cancer after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled IPAA. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all 254 patients operated on for ulcerative colitis who had a restorative proctocolectomy, stapled IPAA, and annual postoperative biopsies of ATZ. Follow-up studies included an annual questionnaire and physical examination. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 2.3±1.4 (mean ± standard deviation) years, low-grade dysplasia was found in eight patients (3.1 percent), 16 (median: range, 6–56) months after surgery. Repeated biopsies revealed dysplasia in only two of eight patients, and completion mucosectomy was performed. Dysplasia in ATZ was associated with a preoperative (P=0.02) or postoperative (P=0.04) pathologic diagnosis of ulcerative colitis with concurrent dysplasia or cancer. No association (P>0.05) was found between dysplasia and the following: age, sex, preoperative length of disease, use of a double-stapledversus single-stapled technique, or anastomotic distance from the dentate line. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of low-grade dysplasia in ATZ was low. Restorative proctocolectomy with total mucosectomy of the anal canal and handsewn IPAA is recommended for patients with preoperative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and concurrent cancer or dysplasia. Frequent follow-up with biopsies is recommended for patients with incidental finding of cancer or high-grade dysplasia after restorative proctocolectomy and stapled IPAA with preservation of ATZ. For persistent or recurrent low-grade dysplasia, we recommend a completion mucosectomyRead at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, May 8 to 13, 1994.