Evaluation of a whole-blood WBC-reduction filter that saves platelets: in vitro studies

BACKGROUND: In this study, a new WBC-reduction in-line filter that removes WBCs but not platelets was evaluated. Three WBC-reduced blood components were prepared: RBCs, plasma, and platelet concentrates (PCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole-blood components (n = 30) were filtered within 2 to 4 hours after collection and then were centrifuged and separated into RBCs, plasma, and WBC-reduced buffy coat. Saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol solution was added to the RBCS: The WBC-reduced buffy coats were stored overnight; on the following day, PCs were prepared from pooled WBC-reduced buffy coats and stored in a medium composed of approximately 35 percent CPD plasma and 65 percent platelet additive solution (T-Sol, Baxter). The WBC-reduction capacity of the filter, the recovery of cells after filtration, and the in vitro storage of RBCs (n = 10) and platelets (n = 6) were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean and maximum WBC counts after filtration were 0.08 x 10(6) and 0.3 x 10(6), respectively, per filtered whole-blood unit. Recovery of RBCs (mean values) after filtration was 90 percent in whole-blood components and 73 percent in RBCS: Recovery of platelets (mean values) was 81 percent after filtration and 66 percent in PCS: The in vitro storage study of RBCs showed results comparable with previously published data, except for a lower degree of hemolysis. In the in vitro platelet storage study, results were compared with those of standard preparations. In all essentials, similar results were found. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study suggest that effective WBC reduction meets current standards and satisfactory recovery after filtration. The storage characteristics for RBCs and PCs are similar to those of standard preparations. Use of a whole-blood in-line filter to save platelets is a new option for whole-blood processing, which may simplify WBC reduction and blood component preparation, as well as reduce costs in the future.     

WBC subset analysis of WBC-reduced platelet components

BACKGROUND: WBC-reduced platelet components may be prepared by filtration or apheresis processing. Both methods have previously been shown to result in a residual total WBC content <5 x 10(6) per component. However, there may be differences in the efficacy of these techniques for removing certain WBC subsets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two multiparameter flow cytometric assays were developed and validated to perform WBC analysis on WBC-reduced platelets collected with two apheresis instruments (Amicus and COBE Spectra) and on 6 units of filtered pooled random-donor platelet concentrates. RESULTS: All components contained <1 x 10(5) WBCs. The COBE Spectra and Amicus apheresis platelet components contained more WBCs than did filtered pooled platelets (p<0.05). Lymphocytes (T and B), monocytes, and granulocytes were identified in all components. Granulocyte content was lowest in the Amicus components and filtered pools. Monocytes were lowest in filtered pools. Amicus platelet components had fewer granulocytes and monocytes than the COBE Spectra platelets. Amicus and COBE Spectra components contained more lymphocytes than the filtered pools. CONCLUSION: Multiparameter flow cytometry can be used to quantify and characterize WBCs in WBC-reduced platelet components. WBC reduction by filtration or apheresis was highly effective. WBCs from each subset were identified in all components. Although filtered pools had the lowest numbers of WBCs, the very low numbers observed in all components suggests that the absolute quantitative differences in WBC subset content are of questionable clinical significance.     

Comparison of a new WBC-reduction system and the standard plateletpheresis protocol in the same donors

BACKGROUND: A cell separator (Spectra, Gambro BCT) with an integrated leukoreduction system (LRS) for producing WBC-reduced single-donor platelet concentrates has been shown to result in a slightly reduced collection efficiency as compared to the former Spectra system without LRS. A novel modified system for improved collection efficiencies (LRS Turbo, Gambro BCT) was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Each of 37 donors underwent plateletpheresis using the LRS Turbo (LRS-T) and the standard LRS (LRS) of the Spectra cell separator. The collection efficiency and WBC contamination of the different techniques were compared. Platelets were counted automatically and WBCs were counted by using one or two full grids of a Nageotte chamber. RESULTS: The preseparation and postseparation numbers of RBCs, WBCs, and platelets, as well as the number of collected platelets, did not differ for the two techniques. In the LRS-T separations, the collection efficiency was 112 percent of that in the LRS procedures. Median residual WBCs in the platelet components were 0.0256 x 10(6) per LRS-T procedure and 0.0253 x 10(6) per LRS procedure. The purity of the LRS-T components was not less than that of the standard LRS components, whereas the collection efficiency of the LRS-T was significantly greater, 44.9 percent versus 40.7 percent. CONCLUSIONS: The LRS-T procedures produced platelet concentrates with WBC-reduction capacity that is comparable to that obtained with the standard LRS procedures, which have previously been described as satisfying the most stringent criteria for WBC-reduced platelets. The new technique significantly improved the collection efficiency of the plateletpheresis procedure.     

Number of RBC units and rate of transfusionto anemic HIV-positive patients assigned to receiveWBC-reduced or non-WBC-reduced RBCs: the viral activation transfusion study experience

BACKGROUND: It is known that the use of filtration to reduce WBCs in RBC units is associated with a 6- to 15-percent loss of RBCs. It is not known if the use of such WBC-reduced RBCs results in an increased need for RBC units or in the transfusion of more units per year to patients with anemia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In the multicenter Viral Activation Transfusion Study (VATS), anemic HIV-positive patients were randomly assigned to receive either WBC-reduced or non-WBC-reduced RBCs. The number of RBC units transfused per patient and the rate of RBC use were studied. All RBC units given after the enrollment transfusion were counted, until the end of follow-up or the occurrence of bleeding (receiving >5 RBCs within 2 consecutive days). RESULTS: As expected, the WBC-reduced RBC units in VATS were lighter in weight than the non-WBC-reduced units (median weight: WBC-reduced, 300 g; non-WBC-reduced, 330 g; p<0.0001). After the enrollment transfusion, 258 WBC-reduced arm patients received 1279 units of RBCs (average, 5.0 units/patient, median, 2 units) while 262 patients in the non-WBC-reduced arm received 1111 RBCs (4.2 units/patient; median, 2 units). The number of units transfused for anemia was slightly greater in the WBC-reduced arm, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.41). Similarly, the rate of RBC use was somewhat higher in the WBC-reduced arm, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.14). The median was 2.3 units per patient per year of follow-up in the WBC-reduced arm; the median in the non-WBC-reduced arm was 1.2 units. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that WBC-reduced RBC units are significantly lighter in weight than non-WBC-reduced RBCs. However, in the setting of a large, randomized, blinded study of transfusion for anemia, the smaller size of the WBC-reduced RBC units had no significant effect on the number of RBC units transfused or on the rate at which RBC units were used. In this study, the frequency of blood transfusion may have had a greater relationship to the frequency of routine, scheduled appointments or transfusion orders for a specified Hb trigger than to the actual Hb content of the unit.     

White cell reduction during plateletpheresis: a comparison of three blood cell separators

BACKGROUND: White cell (WBC)-reduced single-donor platelet concentrates (SDPs) can be collected by the newest generation of blood cell separators. Three WBC-reduction techniques during plateletpheresis were investigated in the present study with respect to WBC content and platelet yield. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Amicus device used the elutriation principle for WBC reduction, and separations with periodically alternating interface position (PAIP) were employed in the AS.TEC 204. WBC reduction by in-line filtration was performed in the MCS+. Platelets were measured electronically and WBCs were determined manually (Nageotte chamber). RESULTS: In-line filtered SDPs showed significantly lower WBC content (0.088+/-0.178 x 10(6)) than SDPs that were WBC reduced by elutriation (0.31+/-0.48 x 106) or PAIP technique (0.89+/-1.57 x 10(6), p = 0.0001). Platelet yield (5.0+/-0.46 x 10(11)) was significantly higher in components obtained with the Amicus device (p = 0.0001). The AS.TEC 204 and MCS+ gave similar results for platelet yields: 3.15+/-0.63 and 3.28+/-0.71 x 10(11), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The plateletpheresis systems studied allow the collection of WBC-reduced SDPs. In-line filtration resulted in the best WBC reduction. Some SDPs collected with the devices studied had a WBC content >1 x 10(6) per unit. Platelet yield was significantly higher in SDPs from the Amicus device.     

In vivo and in vitro characteristics of double units of RBCs collected by apheresis with a single in-line WBC-reduction filter

BACKGROUND: A novel apheresis procedure for a blood separator (MCS+, Haemonetics) enables the collection of 2 WBC-reduced RBC units in a single donation by using one disposable set with one in-line WBC-reduction filter (RC2H, Pall Corp.). The objective of this study was to evaluate the filtration performance in connection with different prefiltration RBC storage conditions and with the in vitro and in vivo storage quality of the filtered units. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-six 2-unit RBC collection and gravity-filtration procedures were completed at three sites, resulting in 132 RBC units. Filtration of the double RBC units was performed at room temperature (RT) within 8 hours of collection (n = 36) and under refrigeration (1-6 degrees C) for up to 24 hours (n = 10) and 72 hours (n = 20) before filtration. RBC quality was compared to that of nonfiltered apheresis RBC units (n = 10). RESULTS: Median filtration time was 6.5 and 14 minutes for units stored at RT and under refrigeration, respectively. All 132 RBC units had residual WBC counts <0.4 x 10(6). The refrigerated units showed a greater mean log reduction in WBCs: 5.06 +/- 0.16 (24 hour) and 4.74 +/- 0.48 (72 hour), respectively, than did RT units: 4.47 +/- 0.28 (p<0.05). RBC loss was less than 12 percent in all cases (mean, 7.8 +/- 1.8%). Minimal differences in volume were observed between the paired RBC units. In vitro RBC storage characteristics of the filtered units were as expected and similar to those of the nonfiltered units. For RBC units held at RT (n = 24), the mean in vivo 24-hour recovery was 81.8 +/- 8.4 percent (double-label). CONCLUSION: Satisfactory filter performance in terms of WBC removal and RBC loss was observed with all 66 procedures, irrespective of storage conditions before filtration.     

WBC-reduced platelet concentrates from pooled buffy coats in additive solution: an evaluation of in vitro and in vivo measures

BACKGROUND: The use of a platelet additive solution (PAS-II, Baxter) may have benefits over plasma for storage of platelets. It was the aim of this study to develop a method to produce WBC-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs) in PAS-II with >240 x 10(9) platelets and <1 x 10(6) WBCs per unit, which can be stored for 5 days at pH >6.8 and that will give sufficient platelet increments after transfusion: a 1-hour CCI of >7.5 and a 20-hour CCI of >2.5. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PCs were made from five pooled buffy coats and 250 g of PAS-II. After centrifugation the PCs were WBC-reduced with a filter (Autostop BC, Pall Biomedical) and stored in a 1000-mL polyolefin container. CCIs were assessed in stable hemato-oncologic patients after 5-day old PCs were transfused. RESULTS: Routinely produced PCs contained a median of 310 x 10(9) platelets (n = 5,363) with 3.5 percent containing <240 x 10(9) platelets, in a median volume of 320 mL (n = 11,834). The median number of WBCs was <0.03 x 10(6) (n = 694). The WBC count exceeded 1 x 10(6) in three PCs, but it was always <5 x 10(6), giving 99-percent confidence that more than 99.5 percent of the units will contain <1 x 10(6) WBCs. The pH remained >6.8 on Day 8, provided the concentration was below 1.1 x 10(9) platelets per mL (n = 32). After 28 transfusions in 28 patients, the 1-hour CCI was 12.6 +/- 4.3 (mean +/- SD, with 2/28 CCIs <7.5) and the 20-hour CCI was 8.9 +/- 5.6 (with 4/28 CCIs <2.5). Limitations of this study include the absence of a control group of patients receiving platelets stored in plasma and of in vivo radiolabeled survival studies, but a comparison of these data with previously published data suggested that the in vivo survival of platelets stored in PAS-II is less than that of platelets stored in plasma. CONCLUSION: The WBC-reduced PCs conformed to specifications. These WBC-reduced PCs could be stored at least 5 days with maintenance of pH, and they gave sufficient increments after transfusion to patients.     

The effect of unmodified or prestorage white cell-reduced allogeneic red cell transfusions on the immune responsiveness in orthopedic surgery patients

BACKGROUND: The immunomodulatory effects of allogeneic blood transfusions have been attributed to the white cells (WBCs) present in the cellular blood components transfused to patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The effect of the transfusion of allogeneic red cells (RBCs) or allogeneic prestorage WBC-reduced RBCs (WBC-reduced RBCs) on host immune responsiveness was evaluated by measuring the lymphocyte subsets and the in-vitro cytokine production in response to phytohemagglutinin stimulation of WBCs of orthopedic surgery patients. Forty-seven patients undergoing hip replacement surgery were randomly assigned to receive allogeneic RBCs (n = 17) or WBC-reduced RBCs (n = 14; 99.95% WBC removal). Sixteen patients were not transfused. Patient blood samples taken before surgery and on Days 1 and 4 after surgery were tested for complete blood count, lymphocyte subset analysis, and measurement of cytokine levels. RESULTS: After surgery, the lymphocyte count was significantly decreased in patients transfused with > or = 3 units of allogeneic RBCs (2.0 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.3 x 10(9)/L; p = 0.017), but not in patients transfused with > or = 3 units of WBC-reduced RBCs (2.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.8 x 10(9)/L). Compared with preoperative levels, on Day 4 after surgery, patients transfused with > or = 3 units of allogeneic RBCs also had a decrease in the number of natural killer cells (0.07 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.04 +/- 0.03 x 10(9)/L; p = 0.018). Postoperatively, interleukin-2 was decreased in one patient who received WBC-reduced RBCs compared with that in four patients transfused with allogeneic RBCs (p = 0.32), and eight untransfused patients (p = 0.01). On Day 4, about 70 percent of patients transfused with allogeneic RBCs showed a 20-percent decrease in the interferon gamma level. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that transfusion of > or = 3 units of allogeneic RBCs is associated with early postoperative lymphopenia in otherwise healthy individuals undergoing surgery. These findings were not observed in those individuals transfused with RBCs that had undergone prestorage WBC reduction.     

Periodic alternating interface positioning to lower WBC contamination of apheresis platelet concentrates: a multicenter evaluation

BACKGROUND: A new software version of a cell separator (AS TEC 204, Fresenius) providing WBC-reduced single-donor plateletpheresis concentrates was tested. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Dual-needle apheresis procedures (n = 621) were performed in three centers, using either fixed interface positioning (FIP) or periodic alternating interface positioning (PAIP). The other separation parameters (e.g., anticoagulant:whole-blood ratio, and blood flow) were set individually. All platelet concentrates were evaluated for platelet yields and contaminating WBCs. RESULTS: The introduction of the PAIP resulted in a significant (p<0.001) reduction in contaminating WBCs (median, 30,000) from the numbers seen with FIP (median, 2,300,000) while maintaining the separation efficacy (47%) and separation time. Ninety-eight percent of all concentrates contained less than 5 x 10(6) WBCs per concentrate and 92 percent contained less than 1 x 10(6). CONCLUSION: Plateletpheresis using the AS TEC 204 cell separator with PAIP is a valid alternative to WBC reduction by filtration. It may provide WBC-reduced platelet concentrates without the additional cost of filters. However, the reliability of the WBC reduction is not yet advanced enough that PAIP can be employed without any monitoring of the end product.     

WBC content of platelet concentrates prepared by the buffy coat method using different processing procedures and storage solutions

BACKGROUND: The number of WBCs in platelet concentrates (PCs) prepared by the buffy coat (BC) method with different storage solutions can result in low (5 x 10(6)/unit) WBC levels by the use of careful centrifugation techniques without filtration. At present, most blood banks use filtration steps to meet these requirements. The difference in processing methods and suspension solutions prompted the investigation of the influence of the various procedures on the WBC and platelet content of PCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PCs from 5 BCs were harvested without or with inline filtration (AutoStop BC, Pall Corp.) in either plasma (PCs-plasma) or platelet additive solution (PCs-PAS-2). After preparation, samples were taken for counting WBCs and platelets and for analyzing WBC subsets by flow cytometry using specific MoAbs. The WBCs were concentrated before analysis of the WBC subsets. Results less than 2.5 cells per microL were considered below the limit of accuracy of the subset analysis. RESULTS: All filtered PCs met the AABB standard of 5 x 10(6) per unit and the European guidelines of 1 x 10(6) per unit. None of the nonfiltered PCs met the European guidelines, but all met the AABB guidelines. All filtered units gave residual WBC counts below the detection limit for subset analysis. Filtered PCs-plasma gave significantly higher platelet counts than filtered PCs-PAS-2 or nonfiltered PCs (p<0.01, ANOVA). CONCLUSION: Careful centrifugation of pooled BCs, with plasma or PAS-2, can result in PCs with low WBC contamination levels. However, filtered PCs are superior, because of better WBC removal and higher platelet counts.     

Counting of residual WBCs in WBC-reduced blood components: a multicenter evaluation of a microvolume fluorimeter by the United Kingdom National Blood Service

BACKGROUND: Implementation of universal WBC reduction of blood components means that automated analytical methods may be the only satisfactory way for production laboratories to meet increased testing requirements. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter study on the performance of a microvolume fluorimeter (IMAGN 2000, Becton Dickinson) was undertaken on 519 RBC, 353 platelet, and 27 fresh plasma units. RESULTS: WBC counts for the RBC samples ranged from 0.02 to 6.94 x 10(6) per unit (mean, 0.57) as determined by FC and from 0.02 to 5.53 x 10(6) per unit (mean, 0.40) as determined by MVF with a mean FC bias of +0.15 x 10(6) WBCs per unit, and discrepancies outside the 95% limits of agreement were mainly associated with higher FC counts. The series of platelet samples showed means of 0.90 (range, 0.06-19.45) and 0.66 (range, 0.01-18.95) x 10(6) WBCs per unit for FC and MVF methods, respectively. FC and MVF results were in good agreement at low counts, although significant discrepancies were noted at higher counts. Overall, for the platelet units, there was a mean FC bias of +0.34 x 10(6) WBCs per unit. The intermethod agreement exceeded 99 percent for both types of blood component when the single (both UK and United States) decision point of 5.0 x 10(6) WBCs per unit was applied. The mean WBC counts for the 27 analyzed fresh plasma units were 61.8, 56.0, and 46.0 per microL by Nageotte hemocytometry, FC, and MVF, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This evaluation found that the level of intersite consistency for FC was relatively poor compared to that for MVF. The results nevertheless validated the broad equivalence of FC and MVF results for the current Council of Europe and UK/US decision points of <1.0 and <5.0 x 10(6) WBCs per unit.     

Residual WBC subsets in filtered prestorage RBCs

BACKGROUND: New-generation RBC filters reduce WBC concentrations by 4 to 5 logs and may prevent or decrease transfusion complications such as HLA alloimmunization, nonhemolytic febrile reaction, and transfusion-transmitted infections. The residual level of WBC subsets may influence efficacy of WBC reduction for preventing various complications. This study analyzed subsets of residual WBCs in WBC-reduced RBC components prepared for a large, multicenter prospective study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Viral Activation Transfusion Study (VATS) assessed the impact of WBC reduction in HIV-1-infected patients undergoing RBC transfusion. WBC-reduced RBC from 11 clinical sites with variable filtration practices were sorted into "low,"middle," and "high" groups based on residual WBC concentration. Subsets were isolated from units by immunocapture (anti-CD4-, anti-CD8-, anti-CD15-, and anti-CD19-coated magnetic beads) and quantified by PCR amplification. RESULTS: After validation studies confirming test methodology, 105 VATS WBC-reduced RBC samples were analyzed. Concentrations of subsets in low and middle residual WBC groups were very low in contrast to relatively high concentrations in the high group. Although highly significant differences were identified between the middle and high groups for total WBCs and all subsets, no single subset predominated. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that overall efficacy of WBC filtration correlates with removal of WBC subsets.     

WBC reduction in cryopreserved RBC units

BACKGROUND: WBC reduction of blood components by filtration is widely practiced to decrease the incidence of alloimmunization. Freezing RBCs reduces the WBC load but is insufficient to achieve the currently recommended US limit of 5 x 10(6) cells per unit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood units were WBC reduced by filtration or by buffy-coat (BC) removal and then frozen in the presence of a high-glycerol concentration. The count of residual WBCs was determined by flow cytometry after deglycerolization. RESULTS: Without WBC reduction, the total number of WBCs present after freezing and thawing was 11.5 +/- 9.2 x 10(6) WBCs per unit (n = 18). Particulate residues from monocytes and neutrophils that were detected in the remaining cell populations were positive for CD66b, CD3, CD14, and CD41. Removal of 40 mL of BC at the time of blood collection lowered the number of WBCs after freezing and deglycerolization to 1.9 +/- 1.20 x 10(6) per unit (n = 11). Similar results were obtained when only 20 mL of BC was removed using a modified blood-bag design. Unfiltered RBC units that were stored for 15 days at 4 degrees C after BC removal contained fewer than 5 x 10(6) WBCs after deglycerolization. Units WBC reduced by filtration before freezing had no detectable WBCs after thawing and washing (n = 14) and did not contain particulate residues. Filtration after deglycerolization was effective in reducing the WBC count below 10(6), although some debris was still present. CONCLUSION: RBC freezing alone will not reduce residual counts to recommended levels. However, initial removal of BC can provide an economical alternative to WBC filtration for cryopreserved units. Units that were not WBC reduced before freezing can be filtered after deglycerolization when needed.     

Prevention of alloimmunization in patients with acute leukemia by use of white cell-reduced blood components—a randomized trial

Platelet refractoriness arising from HLA alloimmunization is a serious complication of transfusion therapy. In a prospective randomized trial, white cell (WBC)-reduced blood components were compared to standard platelet and red cell concentrates with respect to alloimmunization, refractoriness, and platelet increments after transfusion. Sixteen of 31 adult acute leukemia patients received only WBC-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs) and red cells (RBCs), with fewer than 10(6) WBCs per unit. Fifteen control patients received standard blood components with a mean of 0.1 x 10(9) (PCs) and 1 x 10(9) (RBCs) WBCs per unit. Platelet loss during cotton-wool filtration averaged 14 percent (range, 3-32%) from fresh PCs and 24 percent (range, 9-62%) from stored PCs. Filtration did not change corrected increments (CI) measured after transfusion of fresh PCs. The Cl 1 hour after filtration of stored PCs diminished by 27 percent, but the difference was smaller after 18 hours, which suggests better survival of WBC-reduced platelets. The number of platelet units transfused did not differ in the two groups. No patient in the WBC-reduced group developed permanent platelet refractoriness; transient HLA antibodies of low titer developed in two patients. In the control group, one patient became refractory because of immunization and two developed transient HLA antibodies. It can be concluded that the reduction of WBCs in blood components can effectively prevent alloimmunization.     

A hypotonic storage solution did not prolong the viability of RBCs

BACKGROUND: Hypotonic storage solutions and WBC filtration are both reported to improve RBC viability. This study tested the ability of an investigational hypotonic storage solution (AS-24, Medsep Corp.) to extend the viability of liquid-stored RBCs to 8 weeks. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a pair of crossover trials, 11 RBC units, WBC-reduced by filtration and stored in AS-24 for 8 weeks, were compared with units from the same donors that were stored for 6 weeks in AS-3, and 13 RBC units, WBC-reduced by filtration and stored in AS-3 for 8 weeks, were compared with units from the same donors that were stored for 6 weeks in AS-3. Viability was measured by the (51)Cr/(99m)Tc double-isotope method. RESULTS: RBC viability at 8 weeks averaged 64 +/- 3 percent in the AS-24 units and 67 +/- 2 percent in the AS-3 units. It was equal at 77 +/- 3 percent and 77 +/- 2 percent after 6 weeks' storage in AS-3 in both trials. CONCLUSIONS: Prestorage WBC reduction and storage in AS-24 did not extend RBC viability to 8 weeks. The improved viability previously demonstrated with storage of dilute suspensions of RBCs in hypotonic solutions is probably caused by factors other than the hypotonicity.     

The effect of whole-blood storage time on the number of white cells and platelets in whole blood and in white cell-reduced red cells

BACKGROUND: Whole blood (WB) can be stored for some time before it is processed into components. After introduction of universal white cell (WBC) reduction, it was observed that longer WB storage was associated with more residual WBCs in the WBC-reduced red cells (RBCs). Also, weak propidium iodide (PI)-positive events were observed in the flow cytometric WBC counting method, presumably WBC fragments. The effect of storage time on the composition of WB and subsequently prepared WBC-reduced RBCs was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: WB was collected in bottom-and-top collection systems with inline filters, obtained from Baxter, Fresenius, or MacoPharma. Units were stored at room temperature and separated into components in 4-hour intervals between 4 and 24 hours after collection. RBCs were WBC-reduced by inline filtration (approx. 50/group). RESULTS: Platelet (PLT) counts were lower in WB stored for 4 to 8 hours compared to 20 to 24 hours (mean +/- SD): 79 +/- 31 versus 102 +/- 30 for Baxter (p < 0.01); 91 +/- 31 versus 101 +/- 35 for Fresenius (not significant); and 73 +/- 47 versus 97 +/- 31 (all x 10(9) per unit) for MacoPharma (p < 0.01), respectively. The median residual WBC counts in WBC-reduced RBCs for WB stored for 4 to 8 and 20 to 24 hours were 0.03 versus 0.17 for Baxter (p < 0.001), 0.00 versus 0.06 for Fresenius (p < 0.001), and 0.13 versus 0.26 (all x 10(6) per unit) for MacoPharma (not significant), respectively. All WBC-reduced RBCs contained fewer than 5 x 10(6) WBCs per unit. A longer storage time of WB was associated with more weak PI-positive events, irrespective of the filter. CONCLUSION: Longer storage of WB before processing results in counting higher numbers of PLTs in WB, higher numbers of WBCs in WBC-reduced RBCs, and more weak PI-positive events.     

Quality control of white cell-reduced red cells: white cell preservation and simplified counting

BACKGROUND: White cell (WBC) degradation restricts the interval between the filtration process and the assay for residual WBCs. Maintaining WBC integrity would permit extended sample storage for batching and/or shipment to centralized laboratories. The usual quality control assay for WBC-reduced red cell units requires determining the number of WBCs in the entire counting area of a Nageotte hemocytometer, which consists of 40 rows. Reducing the counting area would simplify the quality control procedure. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Adsol red cell units were prepared either on the day of collection (Day 0) or on Day 1 and WBC reduced by filtration on the same day. By using prefiltration and postfiltration red cells, samples containing WBC concentrations of 15, 10, and 3 WBCs per microL were prepared by serial dilution. Identical samples were treated with glutaraldehyde and stored at either 20 to 24 degrees C or 1 to 6 degrees C. All samples were assayed on the day of component preparation and on Days 7 and 14. The numbers of WBCs corresponding to 10- and 40-row areas of the Nageotte hemocytometer were determined. RESULTS: For the conditions and WBC concentration range studied, no significant changes in WBC concentrations were observed through Day 14 for glutaraldehyde-treated samples stored at either temperature, although there were substantial decreases in untreated samples. A 10-row measurement was determined to be sufficient for identifying WBC-reduced red cell units passing the present limit of 5 × 10(6) residual WBCs. CONCLUSION: Glutaraldehyde treatment can preserve WBCs in red cell samples at least up to Day 14, which provides increased efficiency in quality control for laboratories. Current red cell WBC-reduction filters produce components that, when assayed, contain fewer than 10 WBCs per full counting area. The simplified procedure would allow reduction of the counting area by 75 percent.     

A comparison of prestorage WBC-reduced whole-blood-derived platelets and bedside-filtered whole-blood-derived platelets in autologous progenitor cell transplant

BACKGROUND: Prestorage WBC-reduced platelet concentrates (PCs) can be manufactured from platelet-rich plasma (PRP) by in-line filtration of PRP. There are few published data on the clinical use of these products, as compared to bedside-filtered pools of standard PCs (S-PCs) manufactured from PRP. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized trial was conducted in autologous progenitor cell transplant patients requiring platelet transfusions with each patient as his or her own control who was given a pool of 5 units of WBC-reduced PCs and a pool of 6 units of S-PCs within a 3-hour period. The pools were characterized before transfusion for platelet and WBC content, P-selectin expression, and IL-8. The patients were monitored with platelet counts and vital signs and observed for reactions. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Thirty-three transfusions were administered to 13 patients. Median platelet content in the WBC-reduced PC pools was lower than that in the S-PC pools (3.3 vs. 4.0 x 10(11), p<0.01). Median WBC content was 4 to 5 log less in the WBC-reduced PC pools (2.5 x 10(4) vs. 4.6 x 10(8), p<0.01). Median IL-8 levels (pg/mL) were lower in the WBC-reduced PC pools (2 vs. 36, p<0.01). No differences were observed in CCI, but the median absolute increase after transfusion of the S-PC pools was higher (25 vs. 19 x 10(9)/L, p<0.01), which reflected the larger size of the S-PC pools. No overall differences in vital signs were recorded. Two reactions were observed, both in temporal association with the transfusion of pools of S-PCs. CONCLUSIONS: A pool consisting of 5 units of WBC-reduced PCs gave a median platelet increment of 19 x 10(9) per L in these thrombocytopenic patients and has a median WBC content 1 to 2 log below the accepted threshold for primary alloimmunization or CMV transmission.     

Prestorage universal WBC reduction of RBC units does not affect the incidence of transfusion reactions

BACKGROUND: Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR) has been identified as a pivotal reason for prestorage universal WBC reduction. A regional blood center implemented universal prestorage WBC reduction for RBCs on January 1, 2000. Whether prestorage universal WBC reduction of RBC units will affect FNHTR is not known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All reports of RBC transfusion reactions at Barnes-Jewish Hospital submitted for evaluation to the blood bank, before and after the implementation of WBC reduction of RBCs, were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: For the 36,303 allogeneic RBC transfusions administered in 1999, 85 reactions (0.23%) were reported. These reactions were classified as FNHTR in 43 cases, allergic in 13, delayed hemolytic in 19, and miscellaneous in 10. For the 31,543 non-WBC-reduced RBC transfusions performed in 1999, 78 reactions (0.25%) were reported. These reactions were classified as FNHTR in 39 cases, allergic in 13, delayed hemolytic in 19, and miscellaneous in 7. In the first half of 2000, 32 reactions (0.20%) were reported for 16,093 prestorage WBC-reduced RBC transfusions (p = 0.41). There were 13 FNHTRs and 10 allergic, 7 delayed hemolytic, and 2 miscellaneous reactions. The use of prestorage WBC-reduced RBCs did not significantly affect the rate of reactions classified as allergic (0.04% in 1999; 0.06% in 2000; p = 0.43) or as FNHTR (0.12% in 1999; 0.08% in 2000; p = 0.33). For all patients, universal WBC reduction in 2000 did not reduce the rate of FNHTR from the rate seen with selective bedside WBC reduction, the practice used in 1999 (0.12% in 1999; 0.08% in 2000; p = 0.36). CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found in the incidence of transfusion reactions in patients receiving prestorage WBC-reduced RBCs and non-WBC-reduced RBCs. In addition, no difference was found in transfusion reaction rates when periods of prestorage universal WBC reduction were compared to those of selective WBC reduction.     

Evaluation of a concurrent multicomponent collection system for the collection and storage of WBC-reduced RBC apheresis concentrates

BACKGROUND: Multicomponent apheresis procedures offer the possibility of collecting blood components that are standardized, as compared to those available with whole-blood donations. A new separator program for the concurrent collection of RBCs, platelets, and plasma (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare) was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis donors (n = 47) underwent concurrent collection of RBCs, platelets, and plasma by use of the single-needle procedure of the Amicus blood cell separator. A standardized RBC volume (100% Hct) of 200 mL was targeted with either 1 or 2 platelet concentrate units, depending on the donor's predonation characteristics. After collection, the RBC component was sterilely connected to an RBC collection set (Amicus) to allow for the addition of 100 mL of saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol preservative solution and WBC reduction at either ambient temperature or 4 degrees C. The RBC units were subsequently stored at 2 to 6 degrees C for 42 days, and the following in vitro measures were evaluated over the storage period: blood cell counts including Hct and total Hb, plasma Hb, potassium, pH, ATP, and 2,3 DPG. RESULTS: Procedure time averaged 74 +/- 9 minutes, and no adverse events were reported. The absolute RBC volume collected averaged 198 +/- 11 mL with an average Hct value of 83 +/- 2 percent. After filtration, the Hb content averaged 58.2 +/- 2.4 g per unit and residual WBCs averaged 0.038 +/- 0.015 x 10(6) per unit. Day 42 results showed that all units had on average more than 70-percent ATP maintenance, and all of the units had less than 0.8 percent he-molysis. All units had pH values higher than 6.5 on Day 42. CONCLUSION: The concurrent multicomponent collection system (Amicus) can reliably collect a standardized RBC unit of good quality. In vitro testing of the RBCs collected and stored for 42 days met the Council of Europe criteria for transfusion.