Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines

The aim of this study is to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with every second week cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer harboring wild-type KRAS. Patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer that had progressed after chemotherapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine were included. Cetuximab was administered at 500 mg/m(2) biweekly with irinotecan. The primary endpoint was response rate. The pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was also evaluated in 5 patients. From May 2009 to February 2010, a total of 31 patients were enrolled from five institutions. One patient was not eligible. Among the 30 patients who were treated with biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan, partial response was observed in 9 patients. The objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7%-49.4%) and the disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 76.7% (95% CI, 57.7%-90.0%). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 10.8 months. Grade 3 skin toxicity was observed in 3 patients (10.0%) and one treatment related death due to pneumonia was observed. Combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan was effective for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.     

A phase II study of S-1 plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin in heavily-treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Summary  Three-drug combination of fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin has shown survival benefits in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Recently we performed a phase II study of a new 3-drug regimen, TIROX (S-1 plus irinotecan and oxaliplatin) to evaluate efficacy and safety in refractory mCRC patients. Patients with refractory to all of 3 drugs, age ≥18 years, PS 0–2, ≥1 measurable lesion(s) and adequate organ functions were eligible. S-1 was given 40 mg/m² twice a day on D1–14, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² and irinotecan 150 mg/m² on D1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Between Mar 2007 and Nov 2007, 19 patients (of 18 planned) were enrolled; median age 50 years; M/F 12/7; PS 0/1/2 5/13/1; colon/rectum 11/8. By intent-to-treat analysis, ORR was 21.1% (95% CI, 8.7–43.7) and disease control rate was 52.6% (95% CI 31.5–72.8) with four PRs and six SDs. Median duration of disease control was 4.3 months (95% CI 1.7–6.9). Median PFS was 2.6 months (95% CI 2.2–2.9) and median OS was 9.8 months (95% CI 5.3–14.4) after median F/U of 15.4 months. G3/4 toxicities per pt included neutropenia (five, 26.3%), febrile neutropenia (two, 10.5%), thrombocytopenia (one, 5.3%), diarrhea (two, 10.5%) and fatigue (two, 10.5%). TIROX seemed to be feasible and efficacious for refractory mCRC patients, and could be an alternative for patients with good PS but no further treatment options.     

Phase I dose-escalating study of S-1 in combination with oxaliplatin for patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal dose of oxaliplatin, when combined with a fixed dose of S-1 (40 mg/m twice daily on days 1-14) on a 3-week schedule, for patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients were required to have a histologically proven advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer for which they had received no previous chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks. Patients were divided into two groups to receive two doses of oxaliplatin - 100 mg/m or 130 mg/m. Ten patients were enrolled in the study between March 2006 and July 2006, and were followed up until 50% of the patients progressed. All patients were evaluated for chemotherapy-related toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached during the first course. One of six patients experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia at dose level 2 of oxaliplatin. Nonhematological toxicity was mild and tolerable. During the full course of treatment, complete response was achieved in two of the nine evaluated patients and partial response was achieved in one patient. The remaining six patients achieved stable disease during first two courses of therapy, and four patients remained stable at the time of the last follow-up. The median time to progression-free survival was 8.3 months. When combined with a fixed dose of S-1 80 mg/m, oxaliplatin administered at a dose of 130 mg/m is tolerable and recommended for phase II study.     

Phase I trial of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin given every three weeks to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Both irinotecan and oxaliplatin are active agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). There is a strong preclinical rationale for combining these two agents. We sought to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin given every three weeks. METHODS: Cohorts of patients with MCC previously treated with 5-fluorouracil received escalating doses of irinotecan (150, 175, and 200 mg/m(2)) and a fixed dose of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)), both given intravenously every 3 weeks. DLT was evaluated within the first course of treatment. Objective responses were evaluated every two courses and were confirmed at least four weeks later. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were treated and evaluated for toxicity. The DLT was neutropenia, with or without fever, and delayed recovery of neutrophil counts was frequent (13 courses in six patients). Other toxic effects (peripheral neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue) were mild to moderate. Among 13 patients evaluable for activity, four achieved partial responses and nine had stable disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and oxaliplatin is safe and apparently active in the treatment of MCC patients. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 175 mg/m(2) irinotecan plus 130 mg/m(2) oxaliplatin, given every 3 weeks. Neutropenia and delayed recovery of neutrophil counts are the predominant early toxicities with this schedule.     

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus irinotecan and folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil: a phase II study in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Oxaliplatin (OXA) and irinotecan (IRI) are active drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer, their toxicity profiles are not overlapping, and both drugs have shown at least additivity with folinic acid-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5FU). We carried out this phase II study to assess the activity and toxicity of a biweekly regimen including OXA plus IRI on day 1, and levo-folinic acid (LFA) plus 5FU on day 2 (OXIRIFAFU) in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Forty-one patients, all previously treated with adjuvant and/or palliative 5FU-based chemotherapy (16 of them already exposed to IRI, OXA or both), were enrolled into this trial. On the basis of sensitivity to previous treatment, 19 patients were considered as chemo-resistant and 14 patients as chemo-refractory. OXA 110 mg/m (over 2 h) and IRI 175 mg/m (over 1 h) were delivered on day 1, followed by LFA 250 mg/m (2-h infusion) plus 5FU 800 mg/m as intravenous bolus on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 2 weeks. A total of 348 cycles were delivered, with a median of nine cycles per patient (range, 1-12 cycles per patient). Five complete and 13 partial responses were reported on 40 assessable patients, giving a response rate of 45% [95% confidence interval (CI), 29-62%]; eight of 19 (42%) resistant patients and five of 14 (36%) refractory patients achieved a major response, which was also obtained in four of eight (50%) patients pretreated with IRI and in three of eight (38%) patients pretreated with OXA. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia occurred in 68% of patients, but febrile neutropenia or infections affected only seven (17%) patients. No episodes of grade 3 or higher thrombocytopenia or anemia were recorded. Occurrence of severe non-hematologic toxicities by patients were: diarrhea, 34%; vomiting, 17%; peripheral cumulative neuropathy, 15%; stomatitis, 10%; acute cholinergic syndrome, 7%. Actually delivered dose intensities of all three drugs resulted in about two-thirds of the planned ones. After a follow-up of 39 months, median progression-free survival was 7.5 months. Median overall survival was 14.4 (95% CI, 10.4-18.4) months from the start of OXIRIFAFU and 25.3 (95% CI, 18.1-32.5) months from the diagnosis of metastatic disease. This OXIRIFAFU triplet regimen was highly effective in resistant/refractory colorectal cancer patients. A slight dose reduction of all cytotoxic drugs could be advisable in order to improve the tolerability of this regimen without jeopardizing its activity.     

雷替曲塞联合奥沙利铂方案二线治疗晚期结直肠癌的有效性和安全性分析

目的探索分析针对晚期结直肠癌患者以雷替曲塞联合奥沙利铂方案进行二线治疗的有效性以及安全性。方法将我院2015年1月~2016年12月期间收治的晚期结直肠癌患者64例作为研究对象并随机分组,对照组32例均实施常规5-Fu以及甲酰四氢叶酸钙联合奥沙利铂化疗,研究组32例均接受雷替曲塞联合奥沙利铂化疗。将两组患者的临床疗效以及安全性情况进行对比。结果接受治疗后,研究组临床总有效率为37.50%,显著高于对照组的15.63%(P<0.05);研究组疾病控制率为81.25%,显著高于对照组的56.25%(P<0.05)。两组患者高发毒副反应为骨髓抑制,以中性粒细胞减少以及血小板减少为主,两组发生率相对接近(P>0.05);研究组转氨酶升高发生率为21.88%,显著低于对照组的46.88%(P<0.05);研究组呕吐腹泻发生率为31.25%,显著低于对照组的56.25%(P<0.05)。研究组平均疾病进展时间及患者平均生存期均略长于对照组(P>0.05);研究组1年生存率为68.75%,显著高于对照组的43.75%(P<0.05)。结论针对晚期结直肠癌患者以雷替曲塞联合奥沙利铂方案进行二线治疗,临床效果显著,安全性高,具有推广应用价值。     

Phase II study of epirubicin plus oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil as first-line combination therapy in patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an epirubicin, oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil combination in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with previously untreated advanced measurable gastric cancer received epirubicin (50 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 2-h infusion, day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m2, 24-h infusion, day 1-3) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint of this phase II study was the response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Out of 48 patients, 46 were evaluable for efficacy and 48 for toxicity. A median of five cycles (range 1-6) was administered. The overall best response rate was 47.8% (95% confidence interval 33-63%) including 2.2% complete responses and 45.6% partial responses. The median time for progression and median overall survival was 5 (95% confidence interval 4.1-5.9) and 11 months (95% confidence interval 8.1-13.9), respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and leukocytopenia were observed in 25 and 12.5% of patients, respectively. Grade 3/4 nonhematological toxicities included nausea (6.3%), vomiting (14.6%), neurological toxicity (10.4%) and mucositis (2.1%). The epirubicin, oxaliplatin and infusional 5-fluorouracil regimen was effective and well tolerated as a front-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer, and should be evaluated further.     

Chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer: fluorouracil plus folinic acid and irinotecan or oxaliplatin

(1) Following the recent introduction of several new cytotoxic agents, a new look at the role of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer is needed. (2) In one clinical trial of first-line treatment, fluorouracil + folinic acid infusion, after an initial bolus (LV-5FU2 protocol), was more effective and better tolerated than bolus administration alone (Mayo Clinic protocol). (3) Five comparative trials failed to show that raltitrexed was more effective than fluorouracil + folinic acid in first-line treatment, and it has more serious adverse effects. (4) There are no comparative trials of capecitabine or tegafur + uracil versus fluorouracil + folinic acid (LV-5FU2 protocol) in first-line treatment. (5) In three comparative randomised trials involving previously untreated patients, adjunction of oxaliplatin to the fluorouracil + folinic acid combination (FOLFOX protocol) increased both tumour response rate and progression-free survival (by about 2 months), but it also caused more neuropathies, severe diarrhea and severe neutropenia. (6) In two comparative trials of first-line treatment, adjunction of irinotecan to fluorouracil + folinic acid (FOLFIRI protocol) increased the median survival time by about 3 months, to 15-17 months, but increased the incidence of diarrhea, neutropenia, serious cardiovascular disorders and severe thrombosis. (7) In second-line treatment, irinotecan is the only properly assessed drug with a positive impact, prolonging survival compared with appropriate palliative care (34 months after diagnosis, versus 27 months). (8) In one comparative trial, first-line treatment with the FOLFOX protocol, followed by the FOLFIRI protocol, resulted in the same median survival time (21 months) as the reverse sequence. (9) In practice, the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer appears to be the fluorouracil + folinic acid combination (LV-5FU2 protocol) plus either oxaliplatin (FOLFOX protocol) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI protocol). The reference second-line treatment is the FOLFIRI protocol (or the FOLFOX protocol if the FOLFIRI protocol has already been used). These treatments were associated with the longest survival in one trial.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer

In this phase II study, the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine were studied in 42 patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen in an adjuvant setting. Ten patients had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Twenty-eight patients (67%) had visceral disease spread at entry. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was administered weekly on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The mean number of completed cycles was 3.9 and the mean dose delivered was 942.2 mg/m2. Ninety-seven percent of injections were administered as assigned. No complete responses were observed, but there were six partial responses and 24 patients with stable disease lasting 2-9 months. The overall response rate was 14.3% (95% CI 5.4-28.5%). The median survival for all patients was 15.2 months. Maximum WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were observed in five patients for nausea and vomiting, one patient for diarrhea, one patient for pain, seven patients for alanine transaminase, and eight patients for segmented neutrophils. There were no grade 3 and 4 toxicities for alopecia. These data confirm modest single-agent gemcitabine activity in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Gemcitabine's favorable toxicity profile makes it an ideal candidate for combination chemotherapy.     

Phase II trial and pharmacokinetic study of thalidomide in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Introduction. This study was designed to estimate the percentage of objective tumor responses, toxicity profile, and obtain additional information about the plasma pharmacokinetics of thalidomide in patients with refractory and progressing metastatic colorectal cancer. Study design. This phase II clinical trial was conducted according to the two-stage Simon method with the inclusion of consecutive patients. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Academic Hospital (HCPA) of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil. Patients and methods. Seventeen patients with previously treated, refractory progressive metastatic colorectal cancer were eligible. Six patients had prior radiotherapy. The patients had a median of one previous chemotherapy regimen. Patients were initially treated with 200mg/day of thalidomide with an increase in dose by 200mg/day every 2 weeks until a final daily dose of 800mg/day was achieved. Patients were evaluated every 8 weeks for response by radiographic criteria. Plasma pharmacokinetics studies were performed in four patients at 200mg level and in one patient at 600mg during the first 24h. Main outcome measures and results. A total of 17 patients were accrued, all of them being evaluable for toxicity and 14 for response. Thalidomide was well tolerated, with constipation, somnolence, dizziness, and dry mouth being the major toxicities. There were no objective response or stable disease. The median survival was 3.6 months. Single-agent thalidomide is a generally well-tolerated drug that showed no antitumor activity in patients with advanced pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Although thalidomide did not show antitumor activity in this patient population, future studies of this agent in patients at initial stages of the disease (when its antiangiogenic properties may be more relevant to disease progression) could be considered.     

Phase II study of calcitriol-enhanced docetaxel in patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Summary   Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of weekly high-dose oral calcitriol and docetaxel, given to patients with non-resectable, incurable pancreatic cancer. Patients and Methods: Twenty-five patients were enrolled onto this phase II study. Patients were treated with oral calcitriol 0.5 μg/kg on day 1, followed by docetaxel 36 mg/m² IV on day 2, administered weekly for three consecutive weeks, followed by 1 week without treatment. Patients followed a low-calcium diet and increased their hydration. The primary end-point of the trial was time-to-progression. Results: Three of 25 patients attained a partial response (12%, 95% CI 3 to 31) and seven (28%) achieved stable disease. Median time-to-progression was 15 weeks, and median overall survival was 24 weeks. Toxicities observed (hyperglycemia, fatigue) were mostly attributable to the docetaxel or its pre-treatment. Conclusions: This regimen of high-dose calcitriol with docetaxel may have activity in incurable pancreatic cancer, with a modest increase in TTP when compared to historical findings using single-agent docetaxel. However, results do not appear superior to those seen with gemcitabine, with or without erlotinib.     

伊立替康单药二线治疗进展期结直肠癌的疗效观察

目的探讨伊立替康单药二线治疗进展期结直肠癌的临床效果。方法选取2011年1月～2013年1月本院收治的进展期结直肠癌患者50例,给予伊立替康90mg／mz,静脉滴注,第1、8天,每21天重复。2个疗程后评价治疗效果。化疗前常规止吐。结果本组50例患者,无完全缓解（CR）患者,其中,部分缓解（PR）12例（24％）,稳定（SD）26例（52％）,进展（PD）12例（24％）,总有效（CR＋PR）率为24％,疾病控制（CR＋PR＋SD）率为76％。均未出现药物所致死亡及严重不良事件,其中血液学毒性为骨髓抑制I＋Ⅱ度中性粒细胞减少症29例（58％）,Ⅲ＋Ⅳ度中性粒细胞减少症7例（14％）;非血液学毒性为I＋Ⅱ度迟发性腹泻18例（36％）,Ⅲ＋Ⅳ度迟发性腹泻3例（6％）,I＋Ⅱ度恶心呕吐29例（58％）,Ⅲ＋IV度恶心呕吐4例（8％）。结论伊立替康单药二线治疗进展期结直肠癌,效果显著．不良反应轻微。     

转移性结直肠癌二线治疗的研究进展

结直肠癌在全球范围内都是威胁人们健康的重大疾病。内科治疗是进展期结直肠癌的最主要、也是最有效的治疗措施。近年来,转移性结直肠癌的内科治疗效果得到了很大提高。化疗及分子靶向药物治疗能显著改善转移性结直肠癌患者的二线治疗的预后,延长生存时间、提高生活质量。     

Phase II trial of edatrexate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Summary Edatrexate is an analog of methotrexate whichin vitro demonstrated activity against human colon cancer xenografts grown in nude mice. In a phase II trial, 12 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and no prior chemotherapy were treated with Edatrexate 80 mg/m²/week for an initial period of 8 weeks. No objective responses were observed. Edatrexate is inactive against colon cancer at the dose and schedule used in this trial.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic cancer

The present phase II trial was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of polychemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas. Sixteen patients received six courses of an i.v. cytotoxic regimen consisting of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8 and 15) and cisplatin (35 mg/m2, days 1, 8 and 15) administered in 28-day intervals. Complete remission (CR) occurred in one patient (6%), partial remission (PR) in four patients (25%) and stable disease in seven patients (44%), whereas four patients (25%) developed progressive disease resulting in an overall response rate of 31%. Mean duration of responses (CR+PR) was 3.6 (range 0.7-8.5) months and mean time to progression was 7.4 (range 3.8-12.6) months. After a mean observation period of 11.5 months the overall survival was 9.6 months with 12 patients (75%) still being alive, which compares favorably with historical data of the administration of gemcitabine alone. The performance status improved in three (19%) and stabilized in eight (50%) out of 16 patients for 4 weeks or longer. Treatment-associated toxicity included alopecia of WHO grade III in all cases, leukopenia of WHO grades I and II in 10 patients (63%), grade III in five patients (31%), and thrombocytopenia grades I and II in four patients (25%), and grades III and IV in 10 patients (63%). We conclude that the administered dosage and schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer of the pancreas constitutes an active cytotoxic regimen associated with moderate toxicity.     

Phase II study of oral S-1 with irinotecan and bevacizumab (SIRB) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Fluorouracil (5-FU) plus irinotecan combined with bevacizumab has significant activity in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but S-1 has become a substitute for continuous infusion of 5-FU and has a very low incidence of hand-foot syndrome. With the S-1 plus irinotecan regimen (SIR), the response rate was 62.5%, and the progression-free survival was 8.0 months. We report here on an update of efficacy and safety of the SIR plus bevacizumab (SIRB) regimen as first line treatment for mCRC patients. Fifty-one eligible patients with histologically confirmed advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer received this treatment. S-1 was administered orally on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients were assigned on the basis of body surface area (BSA) to receive one of the following oral doses twice daily: 40 mg, 50 mg, or 60 mg. Irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) plus bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg) were administered by intravenous infusion on day 1. Safety analysis identified a grade 3/4 neutropenia rate of 26%. Other grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (8%), nausea (6%), vomiting (2%), and hypertension (8%). The response rate was 67% and the median progression-free survival time was 373 days. The SIRB regimen appears to be highly active and well tolerated as first-line treatment for mCRC.