Effects of Pharmacological Autonomic Blockade on Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathways Physiology in Patients with Slow-Fast Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

The purpose of this study was to investigate the atrioventricular AV nodal physiology and the inducibility of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) under pharmacological autonomic blockade (AB). Seventeen consecutive patients (6 men and 11 women, mean age 39 ± 17 years) with clinical recurrent slow-fast AVNRT received electrophysiological study before and after pharmacological AB with atropine (0.04 mg/kg) and propranolol (0.2 mg/kg). In baseline, all 17 patients could be induced with AVNRT, 5 were isoproterenol-dependent. After pharmacological AB, 12 (71 %) of 17 patients still demonstrated AV nodal duality. AVNRT became noninducible in 7 of 12 nonisoproterenol dependent patients and remained noninducible in all 5 isoproterenol dependent patients. The sinus cycle length (801 ± 105 ms vs 630 ± 80 ms, P < 0.005) and AV blocking cycle length (365 ± 64 ms vs 338 ± 61 ms, P < 0.005) became shorter after AB. The antegrade effective refractory period and functional refractory period of the fast pathway (369 ± 67 ms vs 305 ± 73 ms, P < 0.005; 408 ± 56 ms vs 350 ± 62 ms, P < 0.005) and the slow pathway (271 ± 30 ms vs 258 ± 27 ms, P < 0.01; 344 ± 60 ms vs 295 ± 50 ms, P < 0.005) likewise became significantly shortened. However, the ventriculoatrial blocking cycle length (349 ± 94 ms vs 326 ± 89 ms, NS) and effective refractory period of retrograde fast pathway (228 ± 38 ms vs 240 ± 80 ms, NS) remained unchanged after autonomic blockade. Pharmacological AB unveiling the intrinsic AV nodal physiology could result in the masking of AV nodal duality and the decreased inducibility of clinical AVNRT.     

Double Response of the Ventricle During Transient Entrainment in a Common Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

We report a patient with slow-fast atrioventricuiar (AV)nodal reentrant tachycardia, in which double ventricuJar response was demonstrated during rapid pacing at cycle length of 300 msec or less from the high right atrium. The determinants of double ventricular response during transient entrainment in the present case were: (1)a crucial conduction delay in the slow pathway; (2)the collision between the activation via the antegrade fast pathway (antidromically)of the last paced beat and the activation via the antegrade slow pathway (orthodromically)of the previous paced beat, instead of the unidirectional block in the slow pathway; and (3)the enhanced AV nodal conduction over the antegrade fast pathway.     

Transvenous Ablation with High Frequency Energy for Atrioventricular Junctional (AV Nodal) Reentrant Tachycardia

We performed transcatheter AV junction ablation with high frequency energy in four patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia where extensive trials of several antiarrhythmic drugs failed to prevent further recurrences of tachycardia. Initially high frequency catheter ablation induced complete AV block in all patients. A recuperation of AV 1:1 conduction followed some time later, persisting in follow-up. No complications have been encountered in either the acute phase or the follow-up (from 6 to 8 months; mean +/- SD: 8.7 +/- 2.5 months). The electrophysiological study was carried out 6 weeks following ablation, and all patients showed AV 1:1 conduction. No dual nodal pathway was encountered and no tachycardia could be triggered. With refinement of the method, the potential application of high frequency energy to interrupt intranodal or perinodal connections responsible for reentrant supraventricular tachycardia or to retard AV nodal conduction appears promising.     

Atrial Tachycardia as a Proarrhythmic Effect of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Radiofrequency catheter ablation is now the first line treatment for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The success rate is high with a low incidence of complications. However, a possible proarrhythmic effect of radiofrequency energy has been rarely reported and no study has demonstrated a direct correlation between the anatomic site of the radiofrequency application and the origin of a new post‐ablation arrhythmia. We present a case of a focal atrial tachycardia that occurred after slow pathway radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial nodal reentrant tachycardia and originating close to the previous ablation site. This tachycardia was successfully treated with a second ablation session. (PACE 2011; 34:e33–e37)     

Specificity of Retrograde Conduction in Screening for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Baseline AV conduction properties (antegrade and retrograde) are often used to assess the presence of dual AV nodal physiology or concealed AV accessory pathways. Although retrograde conduction (RET) is assumed to be a prerequisite for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), its prevalence during baseline measurements has not been evaluated. We reviewed all cases of AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation to determine the prevalence of RET at baseline evaluation and after isoproterenol infusion. Results: Seventy-three patients with AVNRT underwent full electrophysiological evaluation. Sixty-six patients had manifest RET and inducible AVNRT during baseline atrial and ventricular stimulation. Seven patients initially demonstrated complete RET block despite antegrade evidence of dual AV nodal physiology. In 3 of these 7 patients AVNRT was inducible at baseline despite the absence of RET. In the other four patients isoproterenol infusion was required for induction of AVNRT, however only 3 of these 4 patients developed RET. One of these remaining patients had persistent VA block after isoproterenol. Conclusions: The induction of AVNRT in the absence of RET suggests that this is not an obligatory feature of this arrhythmia. Therefore, baseline AV conduction properties are unreliable in assessing the presence of AVNRT and isoproterenol infusions should be used routinely to expose RET and reentrant tachycardia.     

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Children

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has been widely used in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. In atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), the experience has been predominantly in adults. The cardiac electrophysiological records of 18 consecutive children undergoing RF catheter AV node modification for AVNRT were reviewed. The patients (10 females, 8 males) were 8.2–17.9 years of age (mean 13.6 ± 3.0), weight 15.2–88.1 kg (mean 52.2 ± 20.8), and height 103–190 cm (mean 157.1 ± 21.7). Thirteen were on antiarrhythmic medications (1–3, average 1.5 drugs/day). All drugs were discontinued 48 hours prior to the ablations. The procedures were performed under sedation and local anesthesia. Pre- and post-AV node modification electrophysiological studies were performed in all procedures. The 18 patients underwent a total of 25 procedures (1.39 ± 0.61 per patient): the anterior approach aimed at the antegrade fast pathway in the first four patients and the posterior approach aimed at the slow pathway in the remainder. Thenumber of energy applications was 8–54 (19.8 ± 10.7) per procedure. The maximum energy used in each procedure was 30–50 watts (33.8 ± 8.4). The average energy was 24–50 watts (33.0 ± 6.8). The fluoroscopy time was 7.1–73.4 minutes (29.9 ± 20.0) per procedure, for a total catheterization time of 228–480 minutes (300.3 ± 59.1). Preablation spontaneous or induced AVNRT (cycle length 310.4 ± 55.0 msec) was seen in all except one who had the arrhythmia (cycle length 270 msec) on surface ECG. In 22 of 25 studies, the AH interval measured 67.4 ± 13.2 msec pre- and 98.7 ± 58.4 msec post-AV node modification (P < 0.02). Procedures were initially successful in 16 (89%) of 18 patients. One patient developed complete AV block requiring DDD pacemaker and has since recovered normal AV conduction. Transient third- or second-degree block was seen in four. Other complications included airway obstruction in one and excessive emesis in another. In follow-up of 2–26 months (13.0 ± 7.3), one patient underwent surgical ablation for failed initial RF catheter ablation, and two underwent successful RF procedures for recurrences. RF catheter AV node modification for AVNRT in children is a useful technique. Under ideal circumstances, it is safe and efficacious. Follow-up to determine the potential long-term complications is necessary.     

Effects of Propafenone on Induction and Maintenance of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 10 patients with atrioventricular (A-V) nodal reentrant paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVT), before and after intravenous administration of propafenone (1.5 mg/kg). All patients utilized an A-V nodal slow pathway for anterograde conduction and an A-V nodal fast pathway for retrograde conduction of the reentrant impulse. Propafenone depressed retrograde fast pathway conduction which was manifested by: 1) complete V-A block at all ventricular paced cycle lengths after propafenone in 3 cases; 2) increase in mean +/- SD of ventricular paced cycle length producing V-A block from less than 308 +/- 37 ms to 432 +/- 63 ms in the remaining 7 patients. Nine of the 10 patients had induction of sustained PSVT before propafenone. In 7 of the 9, PSVT could not be induced or sustained after propafenone, reflecting depression of the retrograde fast pathway conduction with either absence of atrial echoes (5 patients) or induction of nonsustained PSVT, with termination occurring after the QRS (2 patients). In 1 patient, single atrial echoes were induced before propafenone but none were noted after the drug. In only 2 patients was a sustained PSVT inducible after propafenone. In conclusion, propafenone inhibited induction of sustained A-V nodal reentrant PSVT in most patients, reflecting depression of retrograde A-V nodal fast pathway conduction.     

Upper and Lower Common Pathways in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia:

The concepts of upper and lower common pathways represent long-standing controversies of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Over the last years there has been considerable evidence against the presence of a lower and, especially, an upper common pathway as distinct entities that can be identified in most patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. The mechanism and relevance of these concepts remain speculative.     

房室折返性心动过速合并房室结双径路的射频消融治疗

目的:探讨房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)合并房室结双径路(AVNDP)的电生理特征和射频消融术式的选择。方法:对640例阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)进行电生理检查,观察PSVT发作时传导的顺序,然后进行消融治疗。结果:640例PSVT中检出AVRT AVNDP 68例,检出率为10.6%;有8例诱发房室结折返性心动过速,对此类患者进行慢径消融治疗。随访所有经治患者均无复发。结论:AVRT合并AVNDP者阻断房室旁道是消融成功的关键;房室旁道作为"旁观者"时也应作房室旁道消融;如仅有(AH)跳跃但无心动过速者无需接受房室结改良。     

Coincident Idiopathic Left Ventricular Tachycardia and Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Control by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway

A healthy 37-year-old male presented with a history of frequent palpitations and sustained wide QRS complex tachycardia with a right bundle branch block and left axis morphology. Serial electrophysiological studies revealed two inducible tachycardias, which were shown to represent atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia. Transformation from one tachycardia to the other occurred spontaneously as well as following atrial or ventricular pacing. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow atrioventricular nodal pathway resulted in cure of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and the prevention of spontaneous recurrence of ventricular tachycardia, suggesting a role of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in triggering the clinical episodes of ventricular tachycardia. The patient has remained asymptomatic without antiarrhythmic therapy for 8 months.     

Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in a Patient with Reversal of Slow and Fast Pathways Inputs into the Atrioventricular Node

We report a case of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) coexistent with His bundle anomaly and atrial septal defects. The His‐bundle potential was recorded at the coronary sinus (CS) ostium. Fractionated atrial potentials and an A:V electrogram ratio 1:3 were recorded at the anterior septum of the tricuspid annulus approximately 2 cm from CS ostium. Radiofrequency catheter ablation at the anterior septum of the tricuspid annulus effectively eliminated AVNRT. (PACE 2012; 35:e17–e19)     

Titration of Power Output During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Radiofrequency lesions in the anterior, superior aspect of the tricuspid annulus result in selective elimination of fast pathway function in patients with typical atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentry tachycardia. This technique is simple and effective, but has been associated with a significant risk of inadvertent complete AV block. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of two different techniques for radiofrequency catheter ablation of the fast AV nodal pathway. Initially, a fixed power output was used at each target site. This method was compared retrospectively to a newer technique where power output was gradually incremented at each site. Radiofrequency power was initially applied at 10 watts for 10–15 seconds. If no junctional ectopy or a change in PR intervoi was seen, power output was incremented by 2 to 4 watts every 10 to 15 seconds up to a maximum of 30 watts. Thirty seven of 38 (96%) patients treated using this incremental power output were cured of their AV nodal reentry tachycardia. None of these patients developed inadvertent complete AV block. In contrast, 92% of historic controls treated with a fixed power output between 20 and 30 watts achieved a primary success and nine of these 89 (10%) historic controls developed inadvertent complete AV block (P = 0.04). There was no difference in the amplitudes of atrial, His, or ventricular electrograms at the effective sites between the two groups. Conclusions: (1) the anterior approach to radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical AV nodal reentry is associated with a significant risk of inadvertent complete AV block if a fixed power output is used; (2) starting at low power and gradually incrementing the output during radiofrequency energy application reduces the risk of complete AV block; (3) this incremental technique does not compromise efficacy.     

房室结折返性和房室折返性心动过速的对比研究

【目的】探讨房室结折返和房室折返性心动过速（AVNRT,AVRT）的特点及射频消融（RFCA）的疗效和安全性。【方法】回顾性分析本院近6年行RFCA的823例AVNRT和AVRT患者的临床和电生理特点及手术情况。【结果】AVRT较AVNRT多见．AVNRT女性多于男性,而AVRT男性多见（P〈0．01）。AVRT中左侧较右侧旁路多见。左侧旁路以隐匿性为主．而右侧旁路以显性为主（P〈0．01）;左侧旁路男性多见,而右侧旁路以女性为主（P〈0．01）。右侧显性旁路手术成功率明显低于其他旁路和AVNRT（P〈0．05和P〈0．01）．术后复发率明显高于左侧旁路（P〈0．05和P〈0．01）。2例AVNRT术后出现房室传导阻滞而植入心脏起搏器,发生气胸和血气胸6例。心包填塞1例．假性动脉瘤3例,1例左侧旁路放电时出现心室纤颤。无一例患者死亡。【结论】AVNRT和AVRT消融手术成功率高而复发率低．严重并发症较少．RFCA治疗AVNRT和AVRT是有效和安全的。     

Use of Double Ventricular Extrastimulation to Determine the Preexcitation Index in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

The ability of single paced ventricular beats during tachycardia to penetrate the tachycardia circuit and reset the subsequent atrial depolarization (atrial preexcitation), enabling calculation of the "preexcitation index," can be helpful in analyzing supraventricular tachycardias, However, the ventricular refractory period often prevents ventricular capture of beats with the necessary prematurity to demonstrate atrial preexcitation, particularly in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). We hypothesized that the use of double premature stimuli could overcome this limitation. In 25 consecutive patients with either AVNRT or atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) we attempted to demonstrate atrial preexcitation with single and double ventricular extrastimuli. Whereas atrial preexcitation with a single extrastimulus could only be achieved in 3 of 11 patients with AVNRT, all but 1 patient demonstrated atrial preexcitation with the use of double ventricular extrastimuli. On the other hand, in all but 1 patient with AVRT, atrial preexcitation could be achieved with single and double extrastimuli. A formula was derived for obtaining a preexcitation index with double extrastimuli and shown to correspond closely with the preexcitation index obtained with a single extrastimulus in the 16 patients in whom atrial preexcitation could be achieved with single and double extrastimuli. Thus, this technique significantly enhances the ability to achieve atrial preexcitation and to calculate the preexcitation index in patients with AVNRT, and thus may be useful in deciphering tachycardia mechanism in some patients, as well as being a useful technique in studying the electrophysiological properties of the antegrade and retrograde limbs of AVNRT.     

Slow Potential-Guided Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: Characteristics of the Potential Associated with Successful Ablation

To examine the characteristics of Haïssaguerre's slow potential (SP) specific to effective catheter ablation of the slow pathway in AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the properties of SP and its recording site ware analyzed in 52 patients who underwent successful SP-guided ablation. The properties of SP included the ratio of the amplitude of SP to that of atrial potential (A)(SP/A), the SP duration, the interval between His-bundle potential (HP) and SP (HP-SP), the interval between A and SP (A-SP), the interval between SP and ventricular potential (V) (SP-V), and the ratio of A-SP to the interval between A and the V (A-SP/A-V). The SP recording site was determined by the ratio of the amplitude of A to that of V (A/V) and by the relative position of the ablation catheter on X ray (right anterior oblique projection), expressed as the ratio of the distance between the coronary sinus ostium and SP site to that between the coronary sinus ostium and HP recording site (relative SP position). Twenty-eight slow pathways were ablated with a single energy application, while the other 24 required applications ≥ 2. In all successful applications, SP/A, SP duration, HP-SP, A-SP. SP-V, A-SP/A-V, A/V, and relative SP position were 51 %± 25%, 28 ± 5 ms, -11 ± 9 ms, 57 ± 25 ms, 68 ± 13 ms, 46%± 9%, 15%± 13%, and 51%± 13%, respectively. A significant correlation was observed between the relative SP position and A-SP, and between the relative SP position and A-SP/A-V (r = 0.60 and 0.37, respectively), while it was not between the relative SP position and HP-SP, nor between the relative SP position and SP-V. When the characteristics of SP were comparatively analyzed between the effective and ineffective applications in 24 patients in whom applications ≥ 2 were required, there was no difference observed in HP-SP, A-SP, SP-V, A-SP/A-V, and A/V. However, SP/A, SP duration, and the relative SP position in the effective applications were all greater than those in the ineffective ones (56%± 20% vs 35%± 18%, P < 0.001; 29 ± 4 vs 26 ± 5 ms, P < 0.01; and 52%± 15% vs 33%± 11%, P < 0.001, respectively). These results indicate that SP with an amplitude over a half of A amplitude and recorded at the mid-septum of the tricuspid annulus can be a marker for successful slow pathway ablation. Although the local atrial electrogram appears late as the SP recording site shifts to the lower position, the timing of SP relative to HP and V remained unchanged, suggesting that SP is independent of the local atrial activation.