A Phase II Trial of Prexasertib (LY2606368) in Patients With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundThis study assessed the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor prexasertib in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC).Patients and MethodsThis was a parallel-cohort phase II study of 105 mg/m² prexasertib once every 14 days for patients who progressed after no more than two prior therapies and had platinum-sensitive (Cohort 1) or platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory (Cohort 2) disease. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker identification and assessment of an alternative regimen (Cohort 3: 40 mg/m² days 1-3, 14-day cycle).ResultsIn Cohort 1 (n = 58), ORR was 5.2%; DCR, 31%; median PFS, 1.41 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.64); and median OS, 5.42 months (95% CI, 3.75-8.51). In Cohort 2 (n = 60), ORR was 0%; DCR, 20%; median PFS, 1.36 months (95% CI, 1.25-1.45); and median OS, 3.15 months (95% CI, 2.27-5.52). The most frequent all-grade, related, treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (Cohort 1, 69.6%; Cohort 2, 73.3%), decreased platelet count (Cohort 1, 51.8%; Cohort 2, 50.0%), decreased white blood cell count (Cohort 1, 28.6%; Cohort 2, 40.0%), and anemia (Cohort 1, 39.3%; Cohort 2, 28.3%). Eleven patients (19.6%) in Cohort 1 and one patient (1.7%) in Cohort 2 experienced grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia. Prexasertib pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior studies. Cohort 3 outcomes were similar to those of Cohorts 1 and 2. No actionable biomarkers were identified.ConclusionPrexasertib did not demonstrate activity to warrant future development as monotherapy in ED-SCLC.     

A Phase 1 Study of LY2874455, an Oral Selective pan-FGFR Inhibitor,in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Background

We report here a phase 1 study of LY2874455, a potent oral selective pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor.

Objective

The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dosing (RP2D). Secondary objectives included determining toxicity, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of LY2874455.

Patients and Methods

This study comprised two parts: (a) dose escalation with 3 + 3 cohorts in patients with solid tumors and (b) dose-expansion cohorts in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Part A: 36 patients in 11 dose cohorts ranging from 2 to 24 mg twice daily (BID). RP2D was 16 mg BID. Part B: GC cohort, 29 patients, NSCLC cohort, 27 patients, all treated at the RP2D.

Results

LY2874455 was slowly absorbed and generally showed linear PK. The effective half-life was ～12 h. PD properties of LY2874455 occurred at doses ≥10 mg by increases in serum phosphorus. Phosphate binders were administered to control serum phosphorus. LY2874455 was generally well tolerated; most toxicities were grade 1 or 2; most frequent were hyperphosphatemia, diarrhea, and stomatitis. Efficacy: part A: 24 patients evaluable: 1 patient in the 14-mg BID cohort with GC had a partial response (PR); 14 patients had stable disease (SD); part B: NSCLC cohort: 11 of 12 evaluable patients had SD; GC cohort: 15 patients evaluable: 1 patient with PR; 12 patients with SD.

Conclusions

LY2874455 has an RP2D of 16 mg BID and demonstrated good tolerability and activity in solid-organ cancer patients. The role of FGFR inhibition on tumor growth in patients requires further study. (NCT01212107).

Open image in new window

     

Phase 1 Study of Erlotinib and Metformin in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently overexpressed in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). One strategy for overcoming resistance to EGFR inhibition is concomitant inhibition of downstream signaling. The antidiabetic drug metformin inhibits both MAPK and PI3K/mTOR pathway signaling. We evaluated the combination of erlotinib and metformin in a phase 1 study of patients with mTNBC.Patients and MethodsPatients with mTNBC who had received at least one prior line of therapy for metastatic disease were eligible. Erlotinib dose was fixed at 150 mg daily. Metformin dose escalation was planned according to a 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were assessed during the first 5 weeks of therapy. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of metformin with fixed-dose erlotinib. Secondary endpoints were response rate, stable disease rate, and progression-free survival.ResultsEight patients were enrolled. The median number of prior therapies for metastatic disease was 2.5 (range, 1-6). No DLT events were reported during the DLT assessment period. Most adverse events were grade 1/2. Grade 3 diarrhea despite maximum supportive care required dose reduction of metformin in one patient. Grade 3 rash led to study withdrawal in one patient. No grade 4 adverse events were reported. The best observed response was stable disease in 2 patients (25%). Median progression-free survival was 60 days (range, 36-61 days).ConclusionErlotinib and metformin were well tolerated in a population of pretreated mTNBC patients but did not demonstrate efficacy in this population.     

A Pilot Study on Screening of BRCA1 Mutations (185delAG, 1294del40) in Nepalese Breast Cancer Patients

Background: Breast cancer is the second most common malignancy among Nepalese women, accounting for 60% of the total cancer cases in females. Women diagnosed with germline mutations in BRCA1 like 185delAG, 1294del40 develop breast and/or ovarian cancer with a lifelong likelihood of up to 85% whereas presence of a mutation increases the risk for mutations to occur in other genes. The major objective of this study was to find the prevalence of these mutations in Nepalese cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was carried out at two cancer hospitals in the Kathmandu valley over a period of 11 months. Irrespective of age group and stage of canceran appropriate amount of blood was withdrawn from 50 breast cancer patients and 20 controls. DNA was extracted manually and subjected to PCR using primers for 185delAG and 1294del40 mutations. PCR products were then digested with restriction enzyme (DdeII) followed by electrophoresis. Results: Prevalence of 185delAG in reference breast cancer patients was found to be 4/50 (8%) but no 1294del40 was apparent. Conclusions: Several mutations occurring in different exons of BRCA1 as well as mutations in other genes like BRCA2, for example, should also be taken in account.     

Randomized Phase II Trial of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Dinaciclib (MK-7965) Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

IntroductionEffective therapies after failure of treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes are needed for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Dinaciclib (MK-7965, formerly SCH727965), a small-molecule cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity in phase I studies with solid-tumor patients. This phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of dinaciclib compared with that of capecitabine in women with previously treated advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients were randomized to receive either dinaciclib at 50 mg/m², administered as a 2-hour infusion every 21 days, or 1250 mg/m² capecitabine, administered orally twice daily in 21-day cycles.ResultsAn unplanned interim analysis showed that the time to disease progression was inferior with dinaciclib treatment compared with capecitabine treatment; therefore, the trial was stopped after 30 patients were randomized. Dinaciclib treatment demonstrated antitumor activity in 2 of 7 patients with estrogen receptor–positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer (1 confirmed and 1 unconfirmed partial response), as well as acceptable safety and tolerability. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were common and included neutropenia, leukopenia, increase in aspartate aminotransferase, and febrile neutropenia. Population pharmacokinetic model–predicted mean dinaciclib exposure (area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity [AUC_[I]]) at 50 mg/m² was similar to that observed in a previous phase I trial, and no drug accumulation was observed after multiple-dose administration.ConclusionAlthough dinaciclib monotherapy demonstrated some antitumor activity and was generally tolerated, efficacy was not superior to capecitabine. Future studies may be considered to evaluate dinaciclib in select patient populations with metastatic breast cancer and in combination with other agents.     

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Carboplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BackgroundIn this phase II clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of the nonanthracycline combination of carboplatin and nab‐paclitaxel in early stage triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC).Patients and MethodsPatients with newly diagnosed stage II–III TNBC (n = 69) were treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin (area under the curve 6) every 28 days for four cycles plus nab‐paclitaxel (100 mg/m²) weekly for 16 weeks. Pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB) were analyzed with germline mutation status, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), TNBC molecular subtype, and GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS).ResultsSixty‐seven patients were evaluable for safety and response. Fifty‐three (79%) patients experienced grade 3/4 adverse events, including grade 3 anemia (43%), neutropenia (39%), leukopenia (15%), thrombocytopenia (12%), fatigue (7%), peripheral neuropathy (7%), neutropenia (16%), and leukopenia (1%). Twenty‐four patients (35%) had at least one dose delay, and 50 patients (72%) required dose reduction. Sixty‐three (94%) patients completed scheduled treatment. The responses were as follows: 32 of 67 patients (48%) had pCR (RCB 0), 10 of 67 (15%) had RCB I, 19 of 67 (28%) had RCB II, 5 of 67 (7%) had RCB III, and 1 of 67 (2%) progressed and had no surgery. Univariate analysis showed that immune‐hot GSIS and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pCR with odds ratios of 4.62 (p = .005) and 4.76 (p = .03), respectively, and with RCB 0/I versus RCB II/III with odds ratio 4.80 (p = .01). Immune‐hot GSIS was highly correlated with DRD status (p = .03), TIL level (p < .001), and TNBC molecular subtype (p < .001). After adjusting for age, race, stage, and grade, GSIS remained associated with higher pCR and RCB class 0/I versus II/III with odds ratios 7.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.01–25.68; p = .002) and 8.95 (95% CI, 2.09–38.23; p = .003), respectively.ConclusionThe combination of carboplatin and nab‐paclitaxel for early stage high‐risk TNBC showed manageable toxicity and encouraging antitumor activity. Immune‐hot GSIS is associated with higher pCR rate and RCB class 0/1. This study provides an additional rationale for using nonanthracycline platinum‐based therapy for future neoadjuvant trials in early stage TNBCs. Clinical trial identification number: {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01525966","term_id":"NCT01525966"}}NCT01525966Implications for PracticePlatinum is an important neoadjuvant chemotherapy agent for treatment of early stage triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this study, carboplatin and nab‐paclitaxel were well tolerated and highly effective in TNBC, resulting in pathological complete response of 48%. In univariate and multivariate analyses adjusting for age, race, tumor stage and grade, “immune‐hot” GeparSixto immune signature (GSIS) and DNA repair defect (DRD) were associated with higher pathological complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden class 0/1. The association of immune‐hot GSIS with higher pCR holds promise for de‐escalating neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early stage TNBC. Although GSIS is not routinely used in clinic, further development of this immune signature into a clinically applicable assay is indicated.     

Weekly Oral Idarubicin in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study

Sixty postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer entered a phase II study, evaluating idarubicin (IDA) in a weekly schedule. Starting dose was 22.5 mg/m², and median age was 65 years. Five patients were considered ineligible and the response rate among 55 eligible patients was 33%. Median time to treatment failure was 19 weeks and median duration of tumor regression for 18 responding patients was 40 weeks. Hematologic toxic-ity was moderate and non-hematologic toxicity was mild. The study shows that IDA, administered orally in a weekly schedule, has pharmacodynamic properties comparable to IDA in a 3-weekly schedule and to doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.     

A Phase II Study Evaluating Orteronel,an Inhibitor of Androgen Biosynthesis,in Patients With Androgen Receptor (AR)-Expressing Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC)

BackgroundAR is a targetable pathway with AR modulation inhibiting estrogen- and androgen-mediated cell proliferation. Orteronel is an oral, selective, nonsteroidal inhibitor of 17, 20-lyase, a key enzyme in androgen biosynthesis. This study evaluated single-agent orteronel in AR+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC).MethodsMale/female patients with AR+ MBC were grouped in Cohort 1: AR+ TNBC with l-3 prior chemotherapy regimens or Cohort 2: AR+ HR+ (estrogen [ER+]/ progesterone receptor [PR+] positive) HER2+/- with 1 to 3 prior hormonal and at least 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients with HER2+ MBC must have received at least 2 lines of HER2-targeted therapy. Orteronel was administered at 300 mg BID; response rate was the primary endpoint.ResultsSeventy patients were enrolled (Cohort 1, n = 26 and Cohort 2, n = 44). Median treatment duration was 7.1 weeks. Seven patients were on treatment for ≥6 months. One of the 21 evaluated patients in Cohort 1 (4.8%) had an objective response. In Cohort 2, none of the first 23 patients to be evaluated had a response and accrual was stopped. Median progression-free and overall survival were 1.8 and 8.3 months, respectively. Toxicities were predominantly Grade 1 or 2 nausea/vomiting (36%) and fatigue (31%). Grade 3 or 4 events in ≥5% of patients included increased amylase/lipase (10%) and hypertension (6%).ConclusionsOrteronel demonstrated limited clinical activity in heavily pre-treated AR+ MBC. Further development of orteronel in MBC is not recommended. Further efforts to validate the AR as a therapeutic target should focus on identifying new markers predictive of sensitivity to AR-targeted agents.     

Platinum Sensitivity in a BRCA1 Mutation Carrier with Advanced Breast Cancer

Although BRCA1-associated breast carcinomas are frequently detected in nodal-negative stage, they typically present with an aggressive histopathological phenotype that is reflected by a poor prognosis and an increased risk for distant metastatic spread. Recent in vitro data suggest a high sensitivity of BRCA1-associated carcinomas to platinum-based chemotherapy and a lower sensitivity to anthracyclines and taxanes. This is explained by the key role of BRCA1 in DNA double-strand repair via homologous recombination, thereby leading to a higher sensitivity to DNA intercalating agents, such as platinum. Here we present the case of a woman suffering from BRCA1-associated metastatic breast carcinoma that was resistant to docetaxel, but responded strongly to cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. This supports the rationale of ongoing clinical studies.     

A Pilot Study of Extended Adjuvant Therapy with Metronomic Docetaxel for Patients with Operable Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Background: Triple-negative breast(TNBC) cancer is a molecular subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis and did not get approved targeted therapy till now. In the last years, metronomic chemotherapy (mCTH) was investigated to improve treatment outcomes in TNBC patients both in early and metastatic setting due to its anti-angiogenic and immune-stimulatory mechanisms. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant chemotherapy with metronomic docetaxel for patients with operable TNBC. Methods: 31 women with clinically and pathologically proved operable TNBC, either node-negative or node-positive with tumor size ≥ 0,5 cm were enrolled after finishing the primary standard of care treatment.  The patients were subjected to extended adjuvant therapy for 6 months with metronomic low dose docetaxel with starting dose of 15mg/m2 in weekly bases for 4 weeks then the dose was escalated to 20 mg/m2 once per week if there were no side effects. Results: After a median follow up of 36 months (range 6-52), 24 patients (77.4%) were still alive. During the period of follow-up, 12 patients (38.7%) showed disease relapse and 19(61.3%) cases remain free of the disease. The estimated mean of DFS in our study was 38.26 months (95%CI; 31.87 – 44.65) with 2 and 3 years DFS rate of 70.5 % and 56.4% respectively while  the estimated mean of OS was 43.75 months (95% CI; 38.35 – 49.16) with 2 and 3 years OS rates 83.3% and 78.1% respectively, Generally the treatment was tolerated with mild to moderate hematological and non hematological adverse events, all are grade 1,2 and treatment-related deaths were not observed. Conclusion: Extended adjuvant treatment for 6 months with metronomic docetaxel after the primary standard of care therapy was tolerated and has an encouraging survival benefit in patients with operable TNBC and these results need further evaluation in randomized control studies.     

Weekly Oral Idarubicin in Advanced Prostatic Cancer A Phase II Study

Twenty-five patients with advanced prostatic cancer progressing after one course of endocrine treatment entered a phase II study of weekly administration of 30 mg Idarubicin orally. Twenty-two patients were evaluable for response and partial response (PR) was noted in 2 patients and stable disease (NC) in 10 patients. Median survival was 31 weeks and median time to progression was 14 weeks. Twenty-three patients were eligible in a score system combining analgetic consumption and pain reduction measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and 30% achieved a subjective response. Fifteen patients fulfilled treatment with the planned dose and 10 patients had dose reduction to a median of 23.8 mg Idarubicin. Haematological toxicity was ≥ grade 3 (WHO) in 20% of the patients. Non-haematological toxicity was dominated by nausea/vomiting with 48% grade 3 (WHO). In conclusion, Idarubicin seems of limited value in the treatment of patients refractory to first line endocrine treatment.     

Phase II Study of Psychotherapeutic Intervention in Advanced Cancer

The effect of psychosocial counseling on tumor progression was studied in 96 cancer patients, who were no longer amenable to regular medical treatment. Patients were offered 12 sessions of individual experiential-existential counseling, each session lasting 1.5 to 2 hours. In addition patients participated fortnightly in group counseling meetings. In five out of 35 evaluable patients, tumor growth became stationary during or immediately following therapy. In four patients this stationary period last 3–9 months, and in one patient 2 years. Natural Killer cell activity, self-reported loneliness, depression, purpose in life and locus of control showed no change from pre- to post intervention. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

An Early Phase II Study of Etoposide (VP-16) in Advanced Gastric Cancer

An early phase II study was conducted to evaluate the anti-tumoreffects and toxicity of etoposide in patients with unresectableor relapsed advanced gastric cancer. From April 1991 to December1992, 13 patients were enrolled into this study; one was subsequentlyconsidered ineligible. Before enrollment, all the patients hadbeen treated with chemotherapy which did not include etoposide.Etoposide (100 mg/m²/day) was administered as an intravenousinfusion over 120 min for five consecutive days and was repeatedevery four weeks. Seven patients received one course of thistherapy and the remaining five received two. No patient showeda complete or a partial response. No change and progressivedisease were observed in three and nine patients, respectively.The clinical toxicities (grade 3–4; WHO) of leukocytopenia,anemia and alopecia occurred in 50, 42, and 42% of the patients,respectively. We conclude that this dose of etoposide administeredaccording to the present schedule is ineffective in previouslytreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.     

A Phase II Open-Label Study of Ganetespib,a Novel Heat Shock Protein 90 Inhibitor for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

BackgroundGanetespib is a small molecule, nongeldanamycin HSP90 inhibitor with potent inhibitory effects on HSP90-dependent oncoproteins of relevance to breast cancer pathogenesis. We therefore tested ganetespib in an unselected cohort of patients with MBC.Patients and MethodsPatients were treated with single agent ganetespib at 200 mg/m² once weekly for 3 weeks, on a 28-day cycle. Therapy was continued until disease progression. The primary end point was ORR using Reponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.ResultsTwenty-two patients were enrolled with a median age of 51(range, 38-70) years and a median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 (range, 0-1). Most patients had at least 2 previous lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. Most common toxicities, largely grade 1/2, were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and hypersensitivity reaction. The ORR in this unselected population was 9%, with all responses coming from the subset of patients with HER2-positive MBC (2/13; 15%). One patient with TNBC had objective tumor regression in the lung metastases. The clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease > 6 months) was 9%, median progression-free survival was 7 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-19), and median overall survival was 46 weeks (95% CI, 27-not applicable).ConclusionThe study did not meet the prespecified criteria for ORR in the first stage of the Simon 2-stage model in this heavily pretreated unselected population of MBC. However, activity was observed in trastuzumab-refractory HER2-positive and TNBC. Ganetespib was well tolerated and responses in more targeted populations harboring specific HSP90-dependent oncoproteins justifies its further study, particularly as part of rational combinations.     

A Multicenter,Single-Arm Phase II Study of Pemetrexed Plus Doxorubicin Administered Every 21 Days in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer

BackgroundDoxorubicin and pemetrexed have both shown single-agent activity in breast cancer. Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that a combination of the 2 agents might have an additive or synergistic effect. A phase II trial was initiated to assess the antitumor activity and safety of pemetrexed plus doxorubicin in women with advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsAnthracycline-naive patients with advanced breast cancer received doxorubicin 50 mg/m² plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² (both intravenously) on day 1 of 21-day cycles, as first-line therapy, with standard vitamin supplementation. Seventy-nine women were enrolled (median age, 55.3 years). Seventy-six patients (96.2%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≤ 1.ResultsAt baseline, 35 patients (44.3%) had visceral metastases. Three (4.2%) patients were HER2/neu positive, and 30 (42.3%) patients were HER2/neu negative. The objective response rate was 55.7% (95% exact CI, 44.1%-66.9%), including 2 (2.5%) complete responses. Median progression-free survival was 8 months (95% CI, 6.5-13.3 months). Two-year survival rate was 61.7% (95% CI, 49.7%-71.6%). Grade 3/4 drug-related toxicities in ≥ 10% patients included neutropenia (24.1%) and leukopenia (10.1%).ConclusionIn patients with advanced breast cancer, the combination of doxorubicin plus pemetrexed was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity that warrants further study.