Distinct patterns and kinetics of chemokine production regulate dendritic cell function.

Dendritic cells (DC) have been showed to both produce and respond to chemokines. To understand how this may impact on DC function, we analyzed the kinetics of chemokine production and responsiveness during DC maturation. After stimulation with LPS, TNF-alpha or CD40 ligand, the inflammatory chemokines MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta and IL-8 were produced rapidly and at high levels, but only for a few hours, while RANTES and MCP-1 were produced in a sustained fashion. The constitutive chemokines TARC, MDC and PARC were expressed in immature DC and were up-regulated following maturation, while ELC was produced only at late time points. Activated macrophages produced a similar spectrum of chemokines, but did not produce TARC and ELC. In maturing DC chemokine production had different impact on chemokine receptor function. While CCR1 and CCR5 were down-regulated by endogenous or exogenous chemokines, CCR7 levels gradually increased in maturing DC and showed a striking resistance to ligand-induced down-regulation, explaining how DC can sustain the response to SLC and ELC throughout the maturation process. The time-ordered production of inflammatory and constitutive chemokines provides DC with the capacity to self-regulate their migratory behavior as well as to recruit other cells for the afferent and efferent limb of the immune response.     

Uncoupling of inflammatory chemokine receptors by IL-10: generation of functional decoys

As originally demonstrated for the interleukin 1 (IL-1) type II receptor, some primary proinflammatory cytokines from the IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor families are regulated by decoy receptors that are structurally incapable of signaling. Here we report that concomitant exposure to proinflammatory signals and IL-10 generates functional decoy receptors in the chemokine system. Inflammatory signals, which cause dendritic cell (DC) maturation and migration to lymphoid organs, induce a chemokine receptor switch, with down-regulation of inflammatory receptors (such as CCR1, CCR2, CCR5) and induction of CCR7. Concomitant exposure to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and IL-10 blocks the chemokine receptor switch associated with DC maturation. LPS + IL-10-treated DCs showed low expression of CCR7 and high expression of CCR1, CCR2 and CCR5. These receptors were unable to elicit migration. We provide evidence that uncoupled receptors, expressed on LPS + IL-10-treated cells, sequester and scavenge inflammatory chemokines. Similar results were obtained for monocytes exposed to activating signals and IL-10. Thus, in an inflammatory environment, IL-10 generates functional decoy receptors on DC and monocytes, which act as molecular sinks and scavengers for inflammatory chemokines.     

Switch in chemokine receptor expression upon TCR stimulation reveals novel homing potential for recently activated T cells.

When naive T lymphocytes are activated and differentiate into memory/effector cells, they down-regulate receptors for constitutive chemokines such as CXCR4 and CCR7 and acquire receptors for inflammatory chemokines such as CCR3, CCR5 and CXCR3, depending on the Th1/Th2 polarization. This switch in chemokine receptor usage leads to the acquisition of the capacity to migrate into inflamed tissues. Using RNase protection assays, staining with specific antibodies, and response to recombinant chemokines, we now show that following TCR stimulation, memory/effector T cells undergo a further and transient switch in receptor expression. CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR5, CCR6 and CXCR3 are down-regulated within 6 h, while CCR7, CCR4, CCR8 and CXCR5 are up-regulated for 2 to 3 days. Up-regulation of CCR7 following TCR stimulation was observed also among resting peripheral blood T cells and required neither co-stimulation nor exogenous IL-2. On the other hand IL-2 down-regulated CXCR5, up-regulated CCR8 and facilitated the recovery of CCR3 and CCR5. Upon TCR stimulation, Th1 and Th2 cells produced comparable sets of chemokines, including RANTES, macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta, I-309, IL-8 and macrophage-derived chemokine, which may modulate surface chemokine receptors and contribute to cell recruitment at sites of antigenic recognition. Altogether these results show that following TCR stimulation effector/memory T cells transiently acquire responsiveness to constitutive chemokines. As a result, T cells that are activated in tissues may either recirculate to draining lymph nodes or migrate to nearby sites of organized ectopic lymphoid tissues.     

Mature monocyte-derived dendritic cells respond more strongly to CCL19 than to CXCL12: consequences for directional migration

The chemokine receptor CCR7 is crucial for migration of mature dendritic cells (DC) directed toward secondary lymphoid organs; however, there is little knowledge about the function of the homeostatic chemokine receptor CXCR4 in DC and its contribution to directional migration of DC during inflammation. By comparing the impact of chemokine receptor engagement on mature DC we found that the CCR7 ligand CCL19 holds a stronger chemotactic potency than the CXCR4 ligand CXCL12. Moreover, CCL19 elicited rapid, steep and long-lasting mobilization of intracellular calcium in individual cells and induced intense phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and protein kinase B, while the intracellular signals elicited by CXCL12 were in part distinct and significantly weaker. Analysis of chemokine receptor expression revealed that although CCR7 and CXCR4 were expressed by a similar percentage of DC, the mean fluorescence intensity of CCR7 was up to six times higher, suggesting a higher receptor density. Based on these correlations we propose that the type of chemokine signal in conjunction with the expression and functional activity of the respective chemokine receptor is also determining the migration rate and potency of a chemotactic response in mature DC. In conclusion, our data support the fundamental role of CCR7 for rapidly guiding DC toward secondary lymphoid organs at an extra- and intracellular molecular level and on the contrary render CXCR4 a weaker contributor to directional migration of DC during inflammation.     

Differential responsiveness to constitutive vs. inducible chemokines of immature and mature mouse dendritic cells.

Upon exposure to immune or inflammatory stimuli, dendritic cells (DC) migrate from peripheral tissues to lymphoid organs, where they present antigen. The molecular basis for the peculiar trafficking properties of DC is largely unknown. In this study, mouse DC were generated from CD34+ bone marrow precursors and cultured with granulocyte-macrophage-CSF and Flt3 ligand for 9 days. Chemokines active on immature DC include MIP1alpha, RANTES, MIP1beta, MCP-1, MCP-3, and the constitutively expressed SDF1, MDC, and ELC. TNF-alpha-induced DC maturation caused reduction of migration to inducible chemokines (MIP1alpha, RANTES, MIP1beta, MCP-1, and MCP-3) and increased migration to SDF1, MDC, and ELC. Similar results were obtained by CD40 ligation or culture in the presence of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. TNF-alpha down-regulated CC chemokine receptor (CCR)1, CCR2, and CCR5 and up-regulated CCR7 mRNA levels, in agreement with functional data. This study shows that selective responsiveness of mature and immature DC to inducible vs. constitutively produced chemokines can contribute to the regulated trafficking of DC.     

Upon dendritic cell (DC) activation chemokines and chemokine receptor expression are rapidly regulated for recruitment and maintenance of DC at the inflammatory site.

Dendritic cells (DC) are highly motile antigen-presenting cells that are recruited to sites of infection and inflammation to antigen uptake and processing. Then, to initiate T cell-dependent immune responses, they migrate from non-lymphoid organs to lymph nodes and the spleen. Since chemokines have been involved in human DC recruitment, we investigated the role of chemokines on mouse DC migration using the mouse growth factor-dependent immature DC line (D1). In this study, we characterized receptor expression, responsiveness to chemoattractants and chemokine expression of D1 cells during the maturation process induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). MIP-1alpha and MIP-5 were found to be the most effective chemoattractants, CCR1 was the main receptor expressed and modulated during LPS treatment, and MIP-2, RANTES, IP-10 and MCP-1 were the chemokines modulated during DC maturation. Thus, murine DC respond to a unique set of CC and CXC chemokines, and the maturational stage determines the program of chemokine receptors and chemokines that are expressed. Since CCR1 is modulated during the early phases of DC maturation, our results indicate that the CCR1 receptor may participate in the recruitment and maintenance of DC at the inflammatory site.     

Differential migration behavior and chemokine production by myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells

The existence of dendritic cell (DC) subsets is firmly established, but their trafficking properties are still largely unknown. We have indicated that myeloid dendritic cells (M-DCs) and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (P-DCs) isolated from human blood differ widely in the capacity to migrate to chemotactic stimuli. The pattern of chemokine receptors expressed ex vivo by both subsets is similar, but P-DCs display, compared with M-DCs, higher levels of CC chemokine receptor (CCR)5, CCR7, and CXCR3. Intriguingly, most chemokine receptors of P-DCs, in particular those specific for inflammatory chemokines and classical chemotactic agonists, are not functional in circulating cells. Following maturation induced by cluster designation (CD)40 ligation, the receptors for inflammatory chemokines are downregulated and CCR7 on P-DCs becomes coupled to migration. The drastically impaired capacity of blood P-DCs to migrate in response to inflammatory chemotactic signals contrasts with the response to lymph node-homing chemokines, indicating a propensity to migrate to secondary lymphoid organs rather than to sites of inflammation. The distinct migration behavior of DC subsets is accompanied by a different profile of chemokine production. In contrast to the high production by M-DCs, the homeostatic CC chemokine ligand (CCL)17/ thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) is not produced by PDCs in response to any stimulus tested and their production of CCL22/MDC is minimal, if any, compared with M-DCs. Thus, stimulated M-DCs, but not P-DCs, are able to produce high levels of chemokines recruiting T-helper 2 cells (Th2) and T-regulatory cells. Conversely, the proinflammatory chemokine CCL3/macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 is predominantly produced by P-DCs. Therefore, P-DCs appear to produce preferentially proinflammatory chemokines, but to respond selectively to homeostatic ones, whereas the reverse is true for M-DCs, highlighting not only the different migratory properties of these DC subsets, but also their capacity to recruit different cell types at inflammation sites.     

Regulation of dendritic cell trafficking: a process that involves the participation of selective chemokines.

DC function as sentinels of the immune system. They traffic from the blood to the tissues where, while immature, they capture antigens. They then leave the tissues and move to the draining lymphoid organs where, converted into mature DC, they prime naive T cells. This suggestive link between DC traffic pattern and functions led to the investigation of the chemokine responsiveness of DC during their development and maturation. These studies have shown that immature and mature DC are not recruited by the same chemokines. Immature DC respond to many CC- and CXC-chemokines (MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, MIP-5, MCP-3, MCP-4, RANTES, TECK, and SDF-1) and in particular to MIP-3alpha/LARC, which acts through CCR6, a receptor mainly expressed in DC and lymphocytes. Like most other chemokines acting on immature DC, MIP-3alpha is inducible on inflammatory stimuli. In contrast, mature DC have lost their responsiveness to most of these chemokines through receptor down-regulation or desensitization, but acquired responsiveness to MIP-3beta/ELC and 6Ckine/SLC as a consequence of CCR7 up-regulation. MIP-3alpha mRNA is only detected within inflamed epithelial crypts of tonsils, the site of antigen entry known to be infiltrated by immature DC, whereas MIP-3alpha and 6Ckine are specifically expressed in the T cell-rich areas where mature IDC home. These observations suggest a role for chemokines induced on inflammation such as MIP-3alpha in recruitment of immature DC at the site of injury and a role for MIP-3beta/6Ckine in accumulation of antigen-loaded mature DC in T cell-rich areas of the draining lymph node. A better understanding of the regulation of DC trafficking might offer new opportunities of therapeutic interventions to suppress or stimulate the immune response.     

Human cytomegalovirus inhibits the migration of immature dendritic cells by down-regulating cell-surface CCR1 and CCR5

Dendritic cells (DC) play a key role in the host immune response to infections. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection can inhibit the maturation of DC and impair their ability to stimulate T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity. In this study, we assessed the effects of HCMV infection on the migratory behavior of human DC. The HCMV strain TB40/E inhibited the migration of immature monocyte-derived DC in response to inflammatory chemokines by 95% 1 day after infection. This inhibition was mediated by early viral replicative events, which significantly reduced the cell-surface expression of CC chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) and CCR5 by receptor internalization. HCMV infection also induced secretion of the inflammatory chemokines CC chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3)/macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha), CCL4/MIP-1beta, and CCL5/regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted (RANTES). Neutralizing antibodies for these chemokines reduced the effects of HCMV on chemokine receptor expression and on DC migration by approximately 60%. Interestingly, the surface expression of the lymphoid chemokine receptor CCR7 was not up-regulated after HCMV infection on immature DC, and immature-infected DC did not migrate in response to CCL19/MIP-3beta. These findings suggest that blocking the migratory ability of DC may be a potent mechanism used by HCMV to paralyze the early immune response of the host.     

Lack of correlation between chemokine receptor and T(h)1/T(h)2 cytokine expression by individual memory T cells

Chemokine and chemokine receptor interactions may have important roles in leukocyte migration to specific immune reaction sites. Recently, it has been reported that CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 3 and CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5 were preferentially expressed on T(h)1 cells, and CCR3 and CCR4 were preferentially expressed on T(h)2 cells. To investigate chemokine receptor expression by T(h) subsets in vivo, we analyzed cytokine (IL-2, IL-4 and IFN-gamma) and chemokine receptor (CXCR3, CXCR4, CCR3, CCR4 and CCR5) mRNA expression by individual peripheral CD4(+) memory T cells after short-term stimulation, employing a single-cell RT-PCR method. This ex vivo analysis shows that the frequencies of cells expressing chemokine receptor mRNA were not significantly different between T(h)1 and T(h)2 cells in normal peripheral blood. To assess a potential role of in vivo stimulation, we also analyzed unstimulated rheumatoid arthritis synovial CD4(+) memory T cells. CXCR3, CXCR4, CCR3 and CCR5 expression was detected by individual synovial T cells, but the frequencies of chemokine receptor mRNA were not clearly different between T(h)1 and non-T(h)1 cells defined by expression of IFN-gamma or lymphotoxin-alpha mRNA in all RA patients. These data suggest that chemokine receptor expression does not identify individual memory T cells producing T(h)-defining cytokines and therefore chemokine receptor expression cannot be a marker for T(h)1 or T(h)2 cells in vivo.     

Vaccinia virus impairs directional migration and chemokine receptor switch of human dendritic cells

A crucial event for the induction of an anti-viral immune response is the coordinated, phenotype-dependent migration of dendritic cells (DC) to sites of infection and secondary lymphoid organs. Here we show that the vaccinia virus (VV) strains Western Reserve (WR) and modified virus Ankara (MVA) inhibit directional migration of mature DC toward the lymphoid chemokines CCL19 and CXCL12 without affecting surface expression of the respective chemokine receptors or impairing undirected cellular locomotion. Instead, infection with VV results in a deficiency of extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and a disturbance of intracellular calcium mobilization, indicating a viral interference with signaling events downstream of the surface chemokine receptors. In immature DC, apart from inhibiting chemokine-induced migration of infected DC, infection with both VV strains increases expression of the inflammatory chemokine receptors CCR1 and CXCR1 on non-infected bystander DC, which depends on the activity of IFN-alpha. Although functional, these chemokine receptors are resistant to lipopolysaccharide-induced down-regulation. In addition, VV-infected and non-infected bystander DC fail to up-regulate the lymphoid chemokine receptor CCR7 upon activation, together pointing to a disability to undergo the chemokine receptor switch. This study shows that VV targets directional migration of professional antigen-presenting cells at multiple functional levels, revealing a potent viral strategy of immune escape.     

Chicken CCR6 and CCR7 are markers for immature and mature dendritic cells respectively

In mammals, the CC chemokine receptors 6 and 7 (CCR6 and CCR7) play important roles in controlling the trafficking of dendritic cells (DC). CCR6 is expressed primarily on immature DC in the periphery and plays a role in the recruitment of immature DC to sites of potential antigen entry. On encountering pathogens, DC mature and migrate to secondary lymphoid organs where they present pathogen antigen to T cells to initiate specific adaptive immune responses. Maturation involves down-regulation of CCR6 but up-regulation of CCR7. To investigate the role of these two chemokine receptors in the function of DC in the chicken, a full-length chicken CCR7 (chCCR7) cDNA was cloned. Chicken CCR6 (chCCR6) was already available (Munoz et al., 2009). ChCCR7 shows the typical secondary structure of a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor and has 66% and 64% amino acid identity with human and mouse CCR7, respectively. Like its mammalian orthologues, chCCR7 mRNA was highly expressed in most lymphoid tissues (with the exception of the Harderian gland) and also in some non-lymphoid tissues (especially the heart, lung, skin and small intestine). Both chCCR6 and chCCR7 were expressed at the mRNA level in immature chicken bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (chBM-DC), as measured by real-time quantitative RT-PCR. After DC maturation following stimulation with LPS or CD40L, expression levels of chCCR6 mRNA were down-regulated, whereas those of chCCR7 were up-regulated, suggesting that these two chemokine receptors play a similar role in the trafficking of chicken DC as they do in mammals and that they act as markers of immature (chCCR6) and mature (chCCR7) DC.     

Dendritic cell biology and regulation of dendritic cell trafficking by chemokines

DC (dendritic cells) represent an heterogeneous family of cells which function as sentinels of the immune system. They traffic from the blood to the tissues where, while immature, they capture antigens. Then, following inflammatory stimuli, they leave the tissues and move to the draining lymphoid organs where, converted into mature DC, they prime naive T cells. The key role of DC migration in their sentinel function led to the investigation of the chemokine responsiveness of DC populations during their development and maturation. These studies have shown that immature DC respond to many CC and CXC chemokines (MIP-lα, MIP-lβ, MIP-3α, MIP-5, MCP-3, MCP-4, RANTES, TECK and SDF-1) which are inducible upon inflammatory stimuli. Importantly, each immature DC population displays a unique spectrum of chemokine responsiveness. For examples, Langerhans cells migrate selectively to MIP-3α (via CCR6), blood CD11c⁺ DC to MCP chemokines (via CCR2), monocytes derived-DC respond to MIP-1α/β (via CCR1 and CCR5), while blood CD11c^– DC precursors do not respond to any of these chemokines. All these chemokines are inducible upon inflammatory stimuli, in particular MIP-3α, which is only detected within inflamed epithelium, a site of antigen entry known to be infiltrated by immature DC. In contrast to immature DC, mature DC lose their responsiveness to most of these inflammatory chemokines through receptor down-regulation or desensitization, but acquire responsiveness to ELC/MIP-3β and SLC/6Ckine as a consequence of CCR7 up-regulation. ELC/MIP-3β and SLC/6Ckine are specifically expressed in the T-cell-rich areas where mature DC home to become interdigitating DC. Altogether, these observations suggest that the inflammatory chemokines secreted at the site of pathogen invasion will determine the DC subset recruited and will influence the class of the immune response initiated. In contrast, MIP-3β/6Ckine have a determinant role in the accumulation of antigen-loaded mature DC in T cell-rich areas of the draining lymph node, as illustrated by recent observations in mice deficient for CCR7 or SLC/6Ckine. A better understanding of the regulation of DC trafficking might offer new opportunities of therapeutic interventions to suppress, stimulate or deviate the immune response.     

I-TAC/CXCL11 is a natural antagonist for CCR5

The selective CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) agonists, monokine induced by interferon-gamma (IFN- gamma)/CXC chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), IFN-inducible protein 10/CXCL10, and IFN-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (I-TAC)/CXCL11, attract CXCR3+ cells such as CD45RO+ T lymphocytes, B cells, and natural killer cells. Further, all three chemokines are potent, natural antagonists for chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) and feature defensin-like, antimicrobial activities. In this study, we show that I-TAC, in addition to these effects, acts as an antagonist for CCR5. I-TAC inhibited the binding of macrophage-inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha)/CC chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3) to cells transfected with CCR5 and to monocytes. Furthermore, cell migration evoked by regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted (RANTES)/CCL5 and MIP-1beta/CCL4, the selective agonist of CCR5, was inhibited in transfected cells and monocytes, respectively. In two other functional assays, namely the release of free intracellular calcium and actin polymerization, I-TAC reduced CCR5 activities to minimal levels. Sequence and structure analyses indicate a potential role for K17, K49, and Q51 of I-TAC in CCR5 binding. Our results expand on the potential role of I-TAC as a negative modulator in leukocyte migration and activation, as I-TAC would specifically counteract the responses mediated by many "classical," inflammatory chemokines that act not only via CCR3 but via CCR5 as well.     

Distinct effect of CD40 and TNF-signaling on the chemokine/chemokine receptor expression and function of the human monocyte-derived dendritic cells

A key and limiting step in the process of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells （mDCs） for clinical use is their in vitro maturation and in vivo migration. We previously observed that CD40 signal facilitated human mDC growth and maturation. To further explore this process, mDCs generated with GM-CSF and IL-4 were co-cultured with apoptotic tumor cells for 24 hours, followed by incubating with anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody or TNF-a for 48 hours to generate mature DCs. The chemokine/chemokine receptor expression and functions of mature DCs upon various stimuli were determined. The expression of costimulatory molecules on apoptotic tumor cell-loaded mature DCs co-cultured with either anti-CD40 antibody （anti-CD40-DCs） or TNF-a （TNF-DCs） were up-regulated compared to immature DCs, consistent with the abilities of these cytokine to drive DC maturation in vitro. The mRNA levels of chemokines such as stromal cell-derived factor-1a （SDF-1a）, EBV-induced molecule 1 ligand chemokine （ELC）, and IFN inducible protein-10 （IP-10） in anti-CD40 activated DCs were increased and the dendritic cell-specific chemokine 1 （DC-CK1） was moderately up-regulated as compared with other mature DCs. The corresponding chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR7 of anti-CD40-DCs were significantly expressed. The CXCR3 expression on activated T cells stimulated by anti-CD40-DCs was also increased. Moreover, the anti-CD40-DCs had a stronger ability to stimulate T cell proliferation than any other DCs. The NF-xB activity was much higher in anti-CD40-DCs than that of TNF-DCs. These results offer further evidence of the importance of the CD40 signal in developing efficient human DC vaccines for cancer immune therapy. Cellular ＆ Molecular Immunology.     

Differential expression of chemokine receptors on human IgA+ and IgG+ B cells

Organ-specific lymphocyte homing is dependent on the expression of tissue-specific homing receptors and selected chemokine receptors. During the effector phase of an immune response, IgA and IgG antibody-secreting cells (ASC) are differently distributed in the body. Still, B cell expression of L-selectin and the mucosal homing receptor integrin alpha4beta7 is not related to the isotype produced, but only to the site of antigen encounter. In this study, we examined if differences in chemokine responsiveness between IgA+ and IgG+ B cells could explain their different tissue localization. Circulating CD19+ B cells were isolated and their expression of IgA, IgG, and selected chemokine receptors was determined by flow cytometry. Few Ig+ cells expressed CCR2, CCR3, or CCR9, and there was no difference in the expression of these receptors between IgA+ and IgG+ cells. In contrast, CCR4, CCR5, and CXCR3 was expressed on significantly more IgG+ than IgA+ cells. The function of chemokine receptors on memory B cells and ASC was then tested in the transwell system. IgG+ memory cells migrated to a higher extent than IgA+ cells towards the CXCR3 ligand CXCL11/I-TAC, while there was only a small migration towards the CCR4 ligand CCL17/TARC and the CCR9 ligand CCL25/TECK. ASC migrated poorly to all chemokines tested. In conclusion, this study shows that IgG+ and IgA+ memory B cells have a differential expression of the Th1 associated chemokine receptor CXCR3, as well as of CCR4 and CCR5. In contrast, none of the studied chemokine receptors was preferentially expressed by IgA+ cells.     

The Differential Expression and Function of the Inflammatory Chemokine Receptor CXCR5 in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer

Background: Chemokine and chemokine receptors could have played an important role in tumor angiogenesis and distant metastasis. The mechanism of inflammation, expression and function of chemokines and chemokine receptors in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) remain unclear. The purpose of present study is to detect differential expression and function of chemokines and chemokine receptors (CCRs) in BPH and PCa.Methods: BPH-1 and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were co-cultured in Transwell chambers, and human normal prostate (NP) tissues, BPH tissues and PCa tissues were collected. CCR gene-chips were used to analyze and compare the differential expression of CCRs in BPH-1 cells, BPH-1 cells co-cultured with PBMCs, and LNCaP cells. The differential expression of CCRs was detected and validated using real-time PCR, western blotting and immunofluorescence (IF). The proliferation of LNCaP cells was also investigated after the knockdown CXCR5.Results: Results of gene-chips indicated that there was low or no expression of CCR10, CXCR1, CXCR3 and CXCR5 in BPH-1 cells, whereas the expression of these receptors in BPH-1 cells was increased by PBMCs, and the expression was high in LNCaP cells. Furthermore, real-time PCR and western blotting confirmed the above mentioned results. IF verified no or low expression of CXCR1, CXCR3 and CXCR5 in NP tissues, low or moderate expression in BPH and high expression in PCa. However, CCR10 was not expressed at detectable levels in the three groups. The growth and proliferation of LNCaP cells was markedly inhibited after down-regulation of CXCR5.Conclusions: PCa cells expressed high levels of CCR10, CXCR1, CXCR3 and CXCR5. Although BPH cells did not express these factors, their expression was up-regulated when BPH-1 cells were incubated with inflammatory cells. Finally, down-regulation of CXCR5 inhibited the growth and proliferation of LNCaP cells.     

Systemic chemokine and chemokine receptor responses are divergent in allergic versus non-allergic humans

T(h)1- and T(h)2-polarized human T cell clones display distinct patterns of chemokine receptor expression and selective chemokine responsiveness in vitro. We hypothesized that natural exposure to environmental grass pollen would induce differential systemic chemokine and chemokine receptor expression patterns in individuals with allergic rhinitis compared to healthy controls with type 2- and type 1-dominated responses to allergen respectively. To this end, we compared chemokine receptor expression on peripheral blood T cells directly ex vivo and plasma chemokine levels between these two groups of study participants prior to and during the grass pollen season. T(h)1-associated CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 3 was strongly expressed on >50% CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) cells of all subjects. When examined longitudinally, CXCR3 expression increased over the grass pollen season (P < 0.0001), solely in non-allergic subjects. In contrast, for both allergic and non-allergic subjects, CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5 (T(h)1-associated) and CCR3 (T(h)2-associated) were weakly expressed on <10% of CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) cells both prior to and during the grass pollen season. Type 1 chemokines CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 9 and CXCL10 (monokine induced by IFN-gamma and IFN-gamma-inducible protein of 10 kDa: CXCR3 ligands), and type 2 chemokines CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 11 (eotaxin: CCR3 ligand), CCL17 (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine: CCR4 ligand) and CCL22 (monocyte-derived chemokine: CCR4 ligand) were readily detectable in the plasma of most participants. Systemic CXCL9 levels decreased from pre- to grass pollen season in allergics (P < 0.05), whereas CCL17 decreased in non-allergics (P < 0.05) over the same period. Taken together, these longitudinal data suggest a systemic shift to more intensely type 1-dominated responses in non-allergic individuals and, conversely, to more type 2-dominated responses in allergic individuals upon natural re-exposure to grass pollen.     

Distribution and kinetics of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 and CXCR6 expression on human dendritic cell subsets and CD4+ T cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) coordinate T cell responses by producing T cell-attracting chemokines and by inducing the expression of chemokine receptors on T cells. Scavenger receptor for phosphatidylserine and oxidized lipoprotein (SR-PSOX)/CXC chemokine ligand 16 (CXCL16) is a unique chemokine that also functions as an endocytic receptor and an adhesion molecule in its membrane-bound form. SR-PSOX/CXCL16 is the only known ligand of CXC chemokine receptor 6 (CXCR6) that is expressed on activated T cells and thus, may play an important role in enhancing effector functions of T cells. Here, we investigated the expression of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 on human DC subsets and that of CXCR6 on T cell subpopulations to elucidate the dynamics of CXCL16/CXCR6 interaction in DC/T cell responses. Membrane-bound SR-PSOX/CXCL16 was expressed on macrophages, monocyte-derived DCs, and blood myeloid DCs, and the expression increased after DC maturation. Myeloid antigen-presenting cells constitutively secreted SR-PSOX/CXCL16 for an extended period, suggesting the involvement of CXCL16 in peripheral and lymphoid tissues. Plasmacytoid DCs hardly expressed SR-PSOX/CXCL16 on their surfaces but secreted significant amounts of SR-PSOX/CXCL16. A subset of CD4+ effector memory T (T(EM)) cells constitutively expressed CXCR6, whereas central memory T cells (T(CM)) and naive T cells did not. Upon stimulation with mature DCs, however, the expression of CXCR6 on T(CM) cells was markedly up-regulated, whereas the expression on naive T cells was induced only weakly. These results suggest that the interaction between SR-PSOX/CXCL16 and CXCR6 plays an important role in enhancing T(CM) cell responses by mature DCs in lymphoid tissues and in augmenting T(EM) cell responses by macrophages in peripheral inflamed tissues.