下食管括约肌运动和功能与胃食管反流病

目的　观察胃食管反流病 (GERD)患者与对照组餐前、餐后食管pH情况 ,下食管括约肌(LES )运动模式的变化以及酸反流事件与一过性下食管括约肌松弛 (TLESR )、低LES压力 (LESP)的关系。方法　两组受试者均接受连续性 4h食管压力测定 (分别为空腹和餐后 1、2、3h)和食管pH监测 (GERD组检测 4h ,对照组检测 2 4h)。结果　GERD组酸反流事件明显高于对照组 (P <0 0 5 )。两组间TLESR发生率差异无显著性 (P >0 0 5 ) ,但与空腹比较 ,两组餐后 1h和 2hTLESR发生率明显增多 ;GERD组伴有酸反流的TLESR明显高于对照组 (P <0 0 0 1)。 4 3% (2 9/ 6 8)的酸反流事件发生在TLESR期间。 31% (2 1/ 6 8)的酸反流事件出现于低LESP状态中。结论　GERD是多因素参与的病理过程。LES运动形式变化和功能不全是GERD的重要背景因素。     

一过性下食管括约肌松弛与胃食管反流

多年来传统的观念认为下食管括约肌 (ＬＥＳ)屏障功能降低是导致胃食管反流的主要原因。近年来随着上胃肠压力检测技术的发展 ,在卧位状态下对健康志愿者和胃食管反流病 (ＧＥＲＤ)患者进行食管压力和食管 ｐＨ同步监测 ,发现胃食管反流并非均发生于ＬＥＳ压力减低时 ,而常发生在一过性下食管括约肌松弛 (ＴＬＥＳＲ) [1] 。这一发现使得人们对ＧＥＲＤ的病理生理基础进行重新定位 ,同时也能解释为什么有的患者虽然ＬＥＳ压力正常却常常出现反流 ,并为ＧＥＲＤ的治疗提出了新的挑战。虽然对ＴＬＥＳＲ已有多年的研究 ,对ＴＬＥＳＲ有了一定…     

Impact of endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction on lower esophageal sphincter function and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Plication of the gastroesophageal junction by endoscopic suturing has been reported to improve symptoms and reduce acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The mechanisms underlying these effects are not well defined. The aims of our study were to determine the impact of endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction on lower esophageal sphincter (LES) function in patients with GERD. METHODS: In 15 patients (7 males) with GERD (heartburn, % time esophageal pH < 4 greater than 4%, +/- history of erosive esophagitis within 6 months), two plications were performed circumferentially 1 cm below the gastroesophageal junction. Endoscopy and combined postprandial esophageal manometry and pH monitoring were performed before and 6 months after treatment; 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring and symptom assessment were also performed before, and at 6 and 12 months after treatment. RESULTS: Six months after treatment, the rate of transient LES relaxations (tLESRs) was decreased by 37% (p < 0.05) and basal LES pressure had increased from 4.3 +/- 2.2 mmHg to 6.2 +/- 2.1 mmHg (p < 0.05). The rate of postprandial reflux events and acid exposure time were not altered. Endoscopic suturing significantly reduced 24-h esophageal acid exposure from 9.6% (9.0-12.1) to 7.4% (3.9-10.1) at 6 months, due predominantly to a reduction in upright acid exposure. The reduction in total 24-h acid exposure was sustained to 12 months. At repeat endoscopy, only one plication was evident in 6 patients (40%) at 6 months. Seven patients (47%) remained off medications at 6 and 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GERD, endoscopic suturing of the gastroesophageal junction results in a reduction in the rate of tLESRs, and an increase in basal LES pressure. These changes in LES function result in only a modest reduction in gastroesophageal reflux.     

Pathologic gastroesophageal reflux in patients with bronchial asthma

Gastrooesophageal reflux (GER) and asthma bronchiale are frequent diseases. Asthma affects some 3-10% of adults. Gastrooesophageal reflux is present in some 45-89% asthmatic patients. Symptoms of GER are not only gastrooesophageal, and recently increased attention is focused on extraoesophageal symptoms where in particular the relationship of GER and asthma or chronic cough is investigated. At our clinic we implemented a pilot study with the objective to monitor the presence of pathological GER in patients with asthma and to assess whether antireflux therapy will influence the respiratory complaints of the patients. The group was formed by 14 patients selected at random with different severity of asthma and different symptoms of GER. The patients had a baseline examination evaluating the presence of GER (24-hour pH metry) and pulmonary function (FEV1). In case of a pathological GER the patients were treated by antireflux therapy and then check-up examinations were made. It was found that after treatment of GER in patients with asthma in particular subjective symptoms improved such as cough and pyrosis which leads to a substantial improvement of the quality of life. On the other hand reflux treatment did not exert a basic effect on pulmonary functions and it was not possible to reduce the medication of asthma.     

The lower esophageal sphincter in gastroesophageal reflux in children.

Esophageal function was evaluated in 51 children less than 2 years of age with radiologic evidence of gastroesophageal reflux. Detection of an acid esophageal pH was a sensitive measure of gastroesophageal reflux. Lower esophageal sphincter pressures were greater in reflux patients with respiratory symptoms (18.0 +/- 1.4 mm Hg) than in reflux patients without respiratory symptoms (9.5 +/- 1.0 mm Hg). The intra-abdominal segment of the lower esophageal sphincter was shorter in patients with reflux than in controls (0.51 +/- 0.05 cm vs. 0.75 +/- 0.08 cm). It was also shorter in patients requiring surgical therapy (0.34 +/- 0.05 cm) than in those responding to medical therapy (0.63 +/- 0.07 cm).     

Effect of low and high fat meals on lower esophageal sphincter motility and gastroesophageal reflux in healthy subjects

OBJECTIVE: The reported effects of fatty meals on lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are controversial. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to reevaluate the effect of isocaloric and isovolumetric low and high fat meals on LESP and GER. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers (six women, six men, 19 to 31 yr) received an isocaloric (842 kcal) solid-liquid (310 ml with 260 kcal) meal with either a low (10% fat, 14% proteins, 76% carbohydrates) or a high fat content (50% fat, 18% proteins, 32% carbohydrates) in a randomized, double-blinded fashion. The nutritional composition was identical for the solid and liquid part of the meals. In the first post-prandial hour LESP was recorded continuously using a Dent sleeve, and esophageal pH measurement was performed for 3 h postprandially with a glass electrode. We calculated the mean LESP, the frequency of transient LES relaxations (TLESR) and of reflux episodes (RE), the percentage of TLESR with GER, and the fraction time pH <4. RESULTS: For all parameters measured no difference was observed between the low and the high fat meal. Mean LESP amounted to a median of 10.7 mm Hg (range, 7.3 to 15.1 mm Hg) after the low fat meal and to 11.1 mm Hg (5.2 to 16.3 mm Hg) after the high fat meal. The frequency of TLESR (n/1 h) rated to 9 (5 to 13) and 8 (4 to 14), and of RE (n/3 h) to 12 (3 to 22) and 11 (1 to 30). The percentage of TLESR with GER were 37% (0 to 100) and 30% (0 to 78). The fraction time pH <4 amounted to 2.3% (0.2 to 23.7) and 1.8% (0.1 to 28.8) after the low and high fat meal, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy volunteers no difference in post-prandial LESP and GER was seen after a high fat meal compared with an isocaloric and isovolumetric low fat meal. Our results suggest that it is inappropriate to advise GER patients to reduce the fat content of their meals for symptom relief.     

Aging and esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Alterations of esophageal contractions may worsen the esophageal lesions caused by gastroesophageal reflux. The impairment of the contractions may be localized only in the distal esophagus or in the entire esophageal body, and may be worse with the aging process. AIMS: To evaluate the proximal and distal esophageal contractions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms with or without esophagitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied esophageal motility in 104 patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, 42 with normal esophageal endoscopic examination, 47 with mild esophagitis and 15 with severe esophagitis. The esophageal contractions were measured by the manometric method at 2, 7, 12 and 17 cm from the upper esophageal sphincter, after five swallows of a 5 mL bolus of water. RESULTS: The amplitude and area under the curve of contractions were lower in patients with severe esophagitis than in patients without esophagitis or with mild esophagitis in the distal part of the esophageal body (17 cm from the upper esophageal sphincter). In the proximal esophageal body there was no difference in amplitude or area under the curve. In the entire esophageal body there was no difference between the three groups of patients in duration, velocity of peristaltic contractions, or proportion of failed, simultaneous, non-propagated or peristaltic contractions. There was no difference between the patients with less than 50 years or with more than 50 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe esophagitis had lower distal esophageal contraction amplitude than patients without esophagitis or with moderate esophagitis. There was no effect of aging on esophageal contractions.     

Provocation of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations by meals in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux

The effect of a meal on the rate of transient lower esophageal sphinter (LES) relaxations and patterns of gastroesophageal reflux was investigated in 49 patients referred for evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux. Esophageal motility and pH were recorded concurrently before and after a standard meal. In the patients with symptomatic reflux, the meal induced a four-to sevenfold increase in the gastroesophageal reflux through two mechanisms: a four-to fivefold increase in the rate of transient LES relaxations and an increase in the proportion of transient LES relaxations accompanied by reflux from 47% to 68^. Overall the rate of reflux episodes that occurred by mechanisms other than transient LES relaxation did not increase significantly. An exception to these findings were those in six patients with chronically absent basal LES pressure in whom transient LES relaxations could not be scored. In these patients, reflux increased postprandially through mechanisms other than transient LES relaxation. These findings confirm the pivotal importance of transient LES relaxations in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux.     

The lower esophageal sphincter strength in patients with gastroesophageal reflux before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

Lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and sphincter strength (LESS) were measured before and after short and floppy laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in 38 patients with severe gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). These patients were compared with a control group of 23 healthy volunteers. GERD was assessed by stationary manometry, 24-h pH recordings and endoscopy. LESS was verified by motorized pull-back of an air-filled balloon catheter from the stomach into the esophagus. The catheter assembly was well tolerated by all study participants. LESP increased significantly after operation from 8 mmHg to 14 mmHg (75% of normal values; P < 0.0001), but compared to the control group, LESP (22 mmHg) decreased significantly (P < 0.002). In the control group and in patients with GERD, LESP and LESS showed excellent correlation (r = 0.97, r = 0.94, respectively). After LNF, LESS increased significantly from 0.6 to 1.6 N (P < 0.0001), about 166%. We conclude that the measurement of LESS is able to explain the discrepancy between satisfactory NF operation and the distinct increase of postoperative LESP. The evaluation of LESS is a helpful tool in assessing functional understanding of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a short and floppy wrap.     

Colonic fermentation influences lower esophageal sphincter function in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colonic fermentation of carbohydrates is known to influence gastric and esophageal motility in healthy subjects. This study investigated the effects of colonic fermentation induced by oral administration of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: In the cross-over design used in the study, 9 patients with symptomatic GERD were administered a low-residue diet (i.e., 10 g fiber/day) during 2, 7-day periods, receiving either 6.6 g of FOS or placebo 3 times daily after meals. Each period was separated by a wash out of at least 3 weeks. On day 7, esophageal motility and pH were recorded in fasting conditions and after a test meal containing 6.6 g of FOS or placebo. Breath hydrogen concentrations (reflecting colonic fermentation) and plasma concentrations of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), peptide YY, and cholecystokinin were monitored. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, FOS led to a significant increase in the number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and reflux episodes, esophageal acid exposure, and the symptom score for GERD. The integrated plasma response of GLP-1 was significantly higher after FOS than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates increases the rate of TLESRs, the number of acid reflux episodes, and the symptoms of GERD. Although different mechanisms are likely to be involved, excess release of GLP-1 may account, at least in part, for these effects.     

Increase of lower esophageal sphincter pressure after osteopathic intervention on the diaphragm in patients with gastroesophageal reflux

The treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease may be clinical or surgical. The clinical consists basically of the use of drugs; however, there are new techniques to complement this treatment, osteopathic intervention in the diaphragmatic muscle is one these. The objective of the study is to compare pressure values in the examination of esophageal manometry of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before and immediately after osteopathic intervention in the diaphragm muscle. Thirty‐eight patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease – 16 submitted to sham technique and 22 submitted osteopathic technique – were randomly selected. The average respiratory pressure (ARP) and the maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) of the LES were measured by manometry before and after osteopathic technique at the point of highest pressure. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t‐test and Mann–Whitney, and magnitude of the technique proposed was measured using the Cohen's index. Statistically significant difference in the osteopathic technique was found in three out of four in relation to the group of patients who performed the sham technique for the following measures of LES pressure: ARP with P= 0.027. The MEP had no statistical difference (P= 0.146). The values of Cohen d for the same measures were: ARP with d= 0.80 and MEP d= 0.52. Osteopathic manipulative technique produces a positive increment in the LES region soon after its performance.     

Effects of transdermal nicotine on lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal motility

Cigarette smoking has been shown to decrease lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) by 19–42%. This decrease in LESP may be due to nicotine in the cigarette smoke or substances other than nicotine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a nicotine patch on esophageal motility since nicotine patches are devoid of all toxins present in the cigarette smoke except the nicotine. Ten healthy nonsmoking volunteers underwent baseline esophageal manometry. Esophageal manometry was repeated after placing a nicotine transdermal patch (Nicotrol) designed to deliver 15 mg of nicotine per day. The parameters that were compared included LESP by rapid pull-through (LESP-RPT) and station pull-through (LESP-SPT), LES relaxation, and velocity, amplitude, and duration of esophageal contractions. Plasma nicotine and cotinine levels were measured prior to baseline manometry and after 12 hr of placing the nicotine patch. the LESP-RPT decreased by 31% from 17.4±6.1 to 12.1±3.3 (P=0.013) and the LESP-SPT by 27% from 13.4±5.4 to 9.8±4.8 (P=0.029) after the nicotine patch. LES relaxation was present in 100% before and after nicotine patch. There were no significant differences in velocity, duration, and amplitude of esophageal contractions after the nicotine patch. Plasma nicotine and cotinine was absent in all subjects at baseline but was significantly elevated after 12 hr of nicotine patch. Transdermal delivery of nicotine results in a significant reduction in LESP in healthy subjects without effecting LES relaxation or esophageal body motility.The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.This work was published in an abstract form in Gastroenterology 106:A1047, 1994.     

Effect of prolonged gastric distention on lower esophageal sphincter function and gastroesophageal reflux

OBJECTIVES: Morbidly obese patients treated with an intragastric balloon report a transient increase in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms. In the present study, we evaluated the underlying mechanisms of GER and examined the effect of prolonged gastric distention on lower esophageal sphincter function. METHODS: Fasting and postprandial manometric studies were performed in obese subjects (n = 15) before, immediately after, and 10 and 20 wk after placement of a 500-ml water-filled balloon. RESULTS: Residual lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure after water swallows was not affected after balloon placement, excluding mechanical interaction with sleeve function. Postprandial LES pressure was significantly increased after 10 and 20 wk. GER was increased in the right recumbent position until 10 wk after balloon placement, mainly because of an increased percentage of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) accompanied by GER. TLESRs were the main mechanisms underlying reflux both before and after balloon placement. The rate of TLESRs was increased significantly immediately after introduction of the balloon, returning to baseline values after 20 wk. After balloon placement, reflux episodes were evoked by gastric contractions that were not inhibited by meals. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic distention by an intragastric balloon increased reflux up to 10 wk after placement because of an increase in the percentage of TLESRs accompanied by a reflux episode. In addition, prolonged balloon distention increased the rate of TLESRs and created a postprandial state even 10 wk after balloon placement. After 20 wk these effects largely resolved, illustrating adaptation to this artificial situation.     

Compliance measurement of lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal body in achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Little is known about the effect of achalasia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on compliance of the esophageal body and the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Twenty-two patients with achalasia, 14 with GERD, and 14 asymptomatic volunteers were assessed. Recording apparatus consisted of a specially developed PVC bag tied to a compliance catheter, a barostat, and a polygraph. Intrabag pressures were increased incrementally while the bag volume was recorded. In each subject, pressure–volume graphs were constructed for both the esophageal body and LES and the compliance calculated. In achalasia, compliance of the esophageal body was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in controls, whereas LES compliance was similar. Patients with GERD had a highly compliant LES in comparison to both controls and to patients with achalasia (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively); however there was no difference in their esophageal body compliance. In conclusion, foregut motility disorders can cause changes in organ compliance that are detectable using a barostat and a suitably designed compliance bag. Further measurement of compliance may provide clues to the pathogenesis of these disorders.     

Three-dimensional imaging of the lower esophageal sphincter in healthy subjects and gastroesophageal reflux

The resting pressure and intraabdominal length are the most important factors which determine competence of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The intraabdominal sphincter vector volume (ISVV) is a single value which takes into account both of these measurements. Normal values of ISVV and of the total sphincter vector volume (TSVV) were established in 20 normal subjects. The sensitivity and the specificity of ISVV and TSVV were then evaluated in 81 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and in 19 normal subjects and were compared with the usual stepwise pullback manometry (SPM) measuring the resting pressure of the LES at the respiratory inversion point. The motorized pullthrough technique was used to perform the vector volume procedure. Normal values of ISVV were 1870–10740 mm Hg² × mm, and of TSVV 2200–13110 mm Hg² × mm. The sensitivity of ISVV was 93.8% (p < 0.05), of TSVV 80.2%, and of SPM 81.5%. The specificity of ISVV and TSVV was 89.5% and of SPM 78.9% (not significant). Analysis of the intraabdominal sphincter vector volume is more sensitive than the total sphincter vector volume or standard stationary manometry in establishing a defective LES in patients with GERD. Intraabdominal sphincter vector volume analysis will allow surgeons better to identify patients with a defective LES who may be suitable for antireflux surgery.     

Interaction of gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility

The present study addresses the question of whether esophageal motility shortly before, during, and after gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is different in patients with GER disease and healthy controls. Twenty-four-hour continuous recordings of intraesophageal pressures and pH were performed in 12 unselected patients with clinically proven GER disease and in 11 volunteers using a new ambulatory and digital recording device. All GER episodes in each studied subject were classified according to their associated motility pattern shortly before (induction period) and during (response period) GER. More GER episodes were analyzed in patients than in volunteers (median: 41 vs 26, P<0.05), and a total of 917 GER episodes (593 in patients, 324 in volunteers) was recorded. During the induction period patients more often had irregular esophageal contractions (median: 23% vs 13%, P<0.05) and less often had a peristaltic sequence (median: 6% vs 21%) than normals. No difference between patients and controls existed when comparing the frequency of negative pressure peaks or common cavity phenomena shortly before GER. During the response period peristaltic motility in patients was decreased (median: 10% vs 47%, P<0.05). We conclude that: (1) GER events in GER patients are more often associated with irregular esophageal contractions than in healthy controls; (2) GER patients present with a diminished, if any, esophageal peristalsis during GER; and (3) combined ambulatory manometry and pH-metry provides clinically useful information on the individual pathogenesis of GER disease, which is superior to the information retrieved by pH-metry alone.Preliminary results from this study were presented at the Third International Polydisciplinary Congress on Primary Esophageal Motility Disorders in Paris, held from May 19th until 23th 1990.     

Neuro-regulation of lower esophageal sphincter function as treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease

The junction between the esophagus and the stomach is a specialized region, composed of lower esophageal sphincter （LES） and its adjacent anatomical structures, the gastric sling and crural diaphragm. Together these structures work in a coordinated manner to allow ingested food into the stomach while preventing reflux of gastric contents across the esophago-gastric junction （EGJ） into the esophagus. The same zone also permits retrograde passage of air and gastric contents into esophagus during belching and vomiting. The precise coordination required to execute such a complicated task is achieved by a finely-regulated high-pressure zone. This zone keeps the junction between esophagus and stomach continuously closed, but is still able to relax briefly via input from inhibitory neurons that are responsible for its innervation. Alterations of the structure and function of the EGJ and the LES may predispose to gastroesophageal reflux disease （GERD）.     

胃食管反流病食管酸暴露和食管动力学变化特征

目的探讨无效食管动力(IEM)在胃食管反流病(GERD)中的作用,以及体质量对食管酸暴露及食管动力的影响。方法77例GERD典型症状患者全部行食管高分辨率压力测定(HRM)和24 h食管动态pH监测,分析IEM及正常食管动力患者酸暴露情况。结果 77例典型GERD症状患者中病理性酸暴露者38例(49%),在病理性酸暴露组中IEM 9例(24%),正常酸暴露组中IEM 5例(13%)。IEM组LES压力低于食管动力正常组(15.15±3.60 vs 22.15±6.73,P0.01);IEM组总pH4时间(百分比)较正常食管动力组高[(14.78±3.8)%vs(4.30±2.68)%,P0.01];IEM组患者BMI值较高。结论 IEM在GERD中较常见,其食管动力障碍中绝大多数为IEM,IEM与食管远端酸暴露密切相关。