Do health and use of services differ in residents of sheltered accommodation? A pilot study

Objective. To compare the rates of mental health problems, disability and use of health and social services of older people living in sheltered accommodation with those of the rest of the community in the same age group. Design. Door-to-door survey in randomly selected enumeration districts. The districts contained three sheltered accommodation complexes. Residents from these addresses were compared with the others. Setting. London Borough of Islington. Subjects. 700 men and women aged 65 or over. Main outcome measures. Short-CARE depression, dementia and activity scales; the Guy's/Age Concern anxiety scale; individual items detailing problems with mobility, vision and hearing; use of a number of health and social services. Results. The only difference in mental health variables on univariate analysis was a greater severity of cognitive impairment and dementia symptoms in sheltered accommodation. When demographic differences were taken into account, the association with cognitive impairment became statistically insignificant. There were significant associations between residence in sheltered accommodation and several of the disability variables. Increased use of health and social services by sheltered residents remained significant after disability and living alone were taken into account. Conclusions. The residents of sheltered accommodation were more disabled than the general elderly population but, in contrast to those in residential care, did not have a great excess of mental health problems. Indeed, the possibility was raised that sheltered accommodation may protect against depression in people who live alone. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The economic burden of depression in the United States: how did it change between 1990 and 2000?

BACKGROUND: The economic burden of depression was estimated to be 43.7 billion dollars in 1990. A subsequent study reported a cost burden of 52.9 billion dollars using revised prevalence data and a refined workplace cost estimation approach. The objective of the current report is to provide a 10-year update of these estimates using the same methodological framework. METHOD: Using a human capital approach, we developed prevalence-based estimates of 3 major cost categories: (1) direct costs, (2) mortality costs arising from depression-related suicides, and (3) costs associated with depression in the workplace. Cost-of-illness estimates from 1990 were updated to reflect the experience in 2000 using current epidemiologic data and publicly available population, wage, and cost information. RESULTS: Whereas the treatment rate of depression increased by over 50%, its economic burden rose by only 7%, going from 77.4 billion dollars in 1990 (inflation-adjusted dollars) to 83.1 billion dollars in 2000. Of the 2000 total, 26.1 billion dollars (31%) were direct medical costs, 5.4 billion dollars (7%) were suicide-related mortality costs, and 51.5 billion dollars (62%) were workplace costs. CONCLUSION: The economic burden of depression remained relatively stable between 1990 and 2000, despite a dramatic increase in the proportion of depression sufferers who received treatment. Future research will incorporate additional costs associated with depression sufferers, including the excess costs of their coexisting psychiatric and medical conditions and attention to the role of painful conditions as a driver of these costs.     

Associations of state-level rates of depression and fatal opioid overdose in the United States, 2011–2015

Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology - To assess the relationship between state-level depression and opioid overdose deaths between 2011 and 2015 in the United States. We assessed the...     

Rural–urban differences in the prevalence of major depression and associated impairment

BACKGROUND: The possibility of a rural and urban difference in the prevalence of major depression has been of interest to researchers and mental health service providers. The objectives of this analysis were to determine the rural and urban difference in the 12-month prevalence of major depressive episode(s) (MDE) in Canada and whether participants in rural and urban areas differed in the impairment levels due to depressive symptoms and in mental health service utilization. METHODS: Data from the 1998-1999 Canadian National Population Health Survey (NPHS) were used in this study. In the NPHS, MDE was measured by the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-Short Form for Major Depression. Two-week disability and daily life interference due to depressive symptoms were used as indicators of impairment in this analysis. The prevalence of MDE in rural and urban areas, at national and regional levels, was calculated. The association between urbanicity and MDE was evaluated by Odds Ratios, controlling for potential confounders. Impairment levels and mental health service utilization were also compared between the rural and urban groups. RESULTS: NPHS participants in rural areas had a lower prevalence of MDE than those in urban areas, controlling for the effects of race, immigration status, working status and marital status. Non-immigrants and those who are white in rural areas had a lower prevalence of MDE than did those in urban areas, and such differences depended on age and geographic regions. Rural and urban participants did not differ in 2-week disability and daily life interference due to depressive symptoms. However, rural participants were less likely to have contacted health professionals for mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: The reasons for the rural and urban differences in the prevalence of MDE are complex. This may depend on individuals' age, immigration status, race, working status, marital status and the provinces where they live. These differences should be considered in future mental health service planning, particularly at provincial levels. There may be gaps between rural and urban areas in terms of availability of mental health services. This should be addressed in future studies and in mental health service planning.     

Racial differences in depression in the United States: how do subgroup analyses inform a paradox?

Purpose

Non-Hispanic Blacks in the US have lower rates of major depression than non-Hispanic Whites, in national household samples. This has been termed a “paradox,” as Blacks suffer greater exposure to social stressors, a risk factor for depression. Subgroup analyses can inform hypotheses to explain this paradox. For example, it has been suggested that selection bias in household samples undercounts depression in Blacks; if selection is driving the paradox, Black–White differences should be most pronounced among young men with low education.

Methods

We examined Black–White differences in lifetime major depression in subgroups defined simultaneously by sex, age, and education using data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) and the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES).

Results

In NESARC and CPES, Blacks had lower odds than Whites of lifetime major depression in 21 and 23 subgroups, respectively, of 24. All statistically significant differences were in subgroups favoring Blacks, and lower odds in Blacks were more pronounced among those with more education.

Conclusions

These results suggest that hypotheses to explain the paradox must posit global mechanisms that pertain to all subgroups defined by sex, age, and education. Results do not lend support for the selection bias hypothesis.     

Do family physicians and internists differ in knowledge,attitudes, and self-reported approaches for depression?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the relationship of primary care specialty training with self-assessed skill, knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward depression recognition and management. METHOD: A baseline self-report questionnaire was administered to 184 internists and 138 family physicians participating in a multisite depression intervention study. RESULTS: There were no marked differences in knowledge of internists and family physicians regarding depression, in attitudes about the effectiveness of specific therapies, or in barriers to providing optimum treatment for depression. However, compared to internists, family physicians rated themselves as more skilled in the management of depression. When considering management of patients with moderate to severe depression, family physicians were more likely to report that they prescribed a selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (relative odds (RO) = 3.51, 95 percent Confidence interval (CI) [2.19, 5.60] and to personally counsel patients (RO = 1.97, 95 percent CI [1.16, 3.38]) more than half the patients, but were less likely to refer to a specialist in mental health (RO = 0.52, 95 percent CI [0.33, 0.82]) than were internists. Additional potentially influential characteristics did not wholly account for the reported differences in practice according to specialty. Physicians of both specialties expressed considerable uncertainty in their knowledge of psychotherapy and in their evaluation of the effectiveness of other strategies for the prevention of recurrence of depression. CONCLUSION: Strategies to improve mental health care should account for the orientation of primary care physicians to mental health issues.     

Suicide Timing in 18 States of the United States from 2003–2014

We investigated suicide timing over different time periods by age, sex and race/ethnicity. A total of 122,107 suicide deaths were identified from the population-based U.S. National Violent Death Reporting System in 18?U.S. states from 2003 through 2014. Suicides significantly increased (p 相似文献   

Does the recruitment of excitation and inhibition in the motor cortex differ?

The level of excitability within the motor cortex can be described as a balance between excitation and inhibition, but it is unknown how well both processes correlate. To address this question, the authors measured motor cortical excitability and inhibition in healthy human subjects, comparing the recruitment of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP) after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Single-pulse "focal" TMS was applied at intensities varying between 90% and 200% of motor thresholds to the right motor cortex of 15 healthy volunteers. The peak-to peak size of MEP responses and the duration of the CSP were measured in small hand muscles. Stimulus-response (S-R) curves were constructed by plotting the MEP size and CSP duration against stimulus intensities. The absolute duration of CSP and the size MEPs correlated significantly and to a similar extent with stimulus intensity (r = 0.60 and 0.53, respectively). The slope of the MEP-S-R was steeper compared with CSP-S-R, particularly at low stimulation intensities. CSP duration saturated earlier and CSP-S-Rs were shifted upwards at a given stimulus intensity compared with MEP-S-Rs. The findings suggest that recruitment of inhibition and excitation within the sensorimotor cortex correlate. However, inhibitory effects are recruited at lower intensities and saturate earlier than excitation.     

Association of temporal factors and suicides in the United States, 2000–2004

Objective  

The purpose of the study was to examine the association of temporal factors, in particular days of the week and seasons of the year and death from suicide in the United States.     

Qué es la Epilepsia? Attitudes and knowledge of epilepsy by Spanish-speaking adults in the United States

BACKGROUND: Spanish-speaking adults are the largest minority population group in the United States and are disproportionately afflicted by epilepsy. METHODS: A unique 78-item survey instrument conducted entirely in Spanish and devoted to the topic of epilepsy was administered to 760 Spanish-speaking adults in seven large U.S. Hispanic metropolitan areas representing a cross section of the U.S. Hispanic community. The answers were compared with those of 272 non-Hispanic controls administered the same survey in English in June 2004. RESULTS: The Hispanic sample correlated well with U.S. Census data. Spanish-speaking adults are mostly unaware about epilepsy, with 21% reporting no familiarity with the condition (P=0.0001). The vast majority of Hispanics use the term convulsiones or ataque to describe a seizure. Thirteen percent of Hispanics with less than high school education believe that epilepsy is contagious (P=0.0001); 8% see "sins" as a cause of seizures (P=0.0001); and 10% agree that "exorcism" would be a good remedy (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable misinformation about epilepsy in the U.S. Hispanic community. Neurologists must be made aware of U.S. Hispanic attitudes and beliefs regarding epilepsy to provide culturally competent care.     

Family care in the United States—1943

Psychiatric Quarterly -     

Clinical presentation and course of depression in youth: does onset in childhood differ from onset in adolescence?

OBJECTIVE: To simultaneously and prospectively compare the clinical presentation, course, and parental psychiatric history between children and adolescents with major depressive disorder. METHOD: A group of prepubertal children (n = 46) and postpubertal adolescents (n = 22) were assessed with structured interviews for psychopathology and parental psychiatric history and followed once every 2 years for approximately 5 years. RESULTS: With the exception of more depressive melancholic symptoms in the adolescents, both groups had similar depressive symptomatology, duration (average 17 months), severity of the index episode, rates of recovery (85%) and recurrence (40%), comorbid disorders, and parental psychiatric history. Female sex, increased guilt, prior episodes of depression, and parental psychopathology were associated with worse longitudinal course. CONCLUSIONS: In general, major depressive disorder is manifested similarly in children and adolescents, and both groups have a protracted clinical course and high family loading for psychiatric disorders.     

Do spirituality and religiousness differ with regard to personality and recovery from depression? A follow-up study

BackgroundThe studies show that both spirituality and religiousness are protective for mental health. Personality is related with course and outcome of depression, as well as spirituality and religiousness, and their relations toward to recovery from depression are underresearched. This study followed influence of spirituality and religiousness on course and outcome of depression in patients with depressive episode, controlled for personality dimensions.MethodsThe patients were assessed with self-report measures of depression (Beck Depression Inventory), spirituality (WHO-Quality of Life-Spiritual, Religious, Personal Beliefs), religiousness (Duke University Religion Index) and personality (Temperament and Character Inventory). Ninety nine patients finished a year long follow up.ResultsHigher spirituality influenced recovery of depression in patients with depressive episode, but religiousness did not show to be significant predictor of recovery for depression. Dimension harm avoidance was significant predictor of improvement of depression in all points of measurement.LimitationsSome limitations of this research are small sample size, usage of the self-report measures of depression in follow-up period, and the predominantly Catholic affiliation of the participants that can impact the generalizability of our data to other denominations.ConclusionSpirituality and dimension harm avoidance are significant predictors of recovery from depression during a year long follow up.     

Do general and multiple sclerosis-specific quality of life instruments differ?

BACKGROUND: Quality of life instruments provide information that traditional outcome measures used in studies of multiple sclerosis do not. It is unclear if longer, disease-specific instruments provide more useful information than shorter, more general instruments, or whether patients prefer one type to another. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of quality of life in a multiple sclerosis clinic population using a mailed questionnaire that combined three different quality of life instruments; the SF-36, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Instrument-54, and the EuroQol EQ-5D. We assessed the feasability of using each instrument and patient preference for each, calculated correlation coefficients for the summary scores of each instrument and other measures of disease severity, and calculated odds ratios from proportional odds models comparing each instrument with the Expanded Disability Status Scale. RESULTS: We did not find substantial differences between the three instruments. All were well-received by patients, and over 75% felt that the combination of the three instruments best assessed their quality of life. For each instrument there was substantial variability between patients with similar quality of life scores in terms of their disability (as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale and their own perception of their disease severity and quality of life (on simple 1-10 scales). CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life instruments are easy to use and well-received by patients, regardless of their length. There do not appear to be clinically important differences between general and disease-specific instruments. Each instrument appears to measure something other than a patient's disability or perception of their own disease severity or quality of life.