Acute rejection risk in kidney transplant recipients on steroid-avoidance immunosuppression receiving induction with either antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab

Immunosuppression with rapid discontinuation of corticosteroids, usually with induction therapy, is safe in kidney transplant recipients. In 89 patients, we induced immunosuppression with basiliximab or rabbit antithymocyte globulin (17 and 72 patients, respectively). Selection criteria for basiliximab were age (>or=65 years), history (malignancy; chronic infection), and type 1 diabetes mellitus (eligible for pancreas transplant). Steroids were administered through posttransplantation day 4 (five doses); maintenance immunosuppression was with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. At last follow-up (average, 286 days), most patients were steroid-free (antithymocyte globulin, 90%; basiliximab, 88%). Protocol biopsies were performed at 1, 4, and 12 months posttransplantation. The overall risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 12%. At 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection-free survival was 93% for antithymocyte globulin, 65% for basiliximab (P<.001). Median time to biopsy-proven acute rejection was 27 and 71 days, respectively. The low incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection with steroid-avoidance immunosuppression may be further reduced with antithymocyte globulin.     

Independent risk factors predicting acute graft rejection in cardiac transplant recipients treated by triple drug immunosuppression

To assess independent risk factors predicting the occurrence of clinically significant acute rejection episodes in the first 6 months after cardiac transplantation, we performed a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Forty-three recipients, undergoing transplantation between September 1986 and May 1988, were eligible for analysis and received standardized, low-dose triple drug maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone. Immunoprophylaxis was supplemented perioperatively with either a polyclonal (antithymocyte globulin, N = 26) or a monoclonal (OKT3, N = 17) anti-T-cell antibody. Investigated, conceivable risk factors comprised recipient and donor age, ischemic time, perioperative anti-T-cell antibody prophylaxis, recipient preoperative status, underlying disease, previous cardiac operation, and histocompatibility parameter (mismatches for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DR, HLA-B+DR, HLA-A+B+DR, and Rh0[D] antigen, HLA-DRw6 positive recipient, and identify for ABO system). Univariate analysis suggested significant influence of the type of antibody used perioperatively (p = 0.0024) and the number of mismatches for HLA-A+B+DR (p = 0.0037) and for HLA-B+DR (p = 0.0043). Stepwise logistic regression yielded the number of mismatches for HLA-B+DR (p = 0.0029) and the type of antibody used perioperatively (p = 0.0031) as being highly significant predictors of acute cardiac rejection. Six-month freedom from rejection was 100%, 41%, and 27% for recipients with two, three, and four mismatches for HLA-B+DR and 59% versus 22% for recipients with polyclonal versus monoclonal antibody prophylaxis. Similar to results with kidney transplantation, these results indicate that a poor donor/recipient match for combined HLA-B+DR loci constitutes an independent risk factor for acute graft rejection in low-dose triple drug immunosuppressed cardiac recipients, which stimulates the potential concept of prospective HLA matching. In our experience OKT3 prophylaxis provides significantly less effective prevention of acute rejection than a comparable course of antithymocyte globulin.     

No increase in rejection or graft loss in kidney transplant recipients with thrombophilia treated with anticoagulation and triple immunosuppression

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies from Europe have demonstrated that patients with end-stage renal disease who receive a kidney transplant are at an increased risk for rejection and graft loss when compared with patients who have no known thrombophilia. The role of anticoagulation has not been investigated in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively tested patients who were evaluated for a kidney transplant for 8 thrombophilias, protein S and C deficiencies, factor V Leiden mutation, antithrombin III deficiency, anticardiolipin antibody, lupus anticoagulant, prothrombin gene mutation, and heparin-induced platelet antibody (HIPA). Patients with any identified thrombophilia received heparin or argatroban (for HIPA (+) patients) followed by coumadin for 1 year after transplantation. Triple therapy included cyclosporine, prednisone, and CellCept (Roche Pharmaceuticals, Nutley, NJ, USA). Sensitized, black, or repeat transplantation patients received induction with an interleukin (IL)-2 inhibitor. Data were collected in a retrospective manner. Rejection was biopsy-proven. RESULTS: Of the 112 transplant recipients who were tested for thrombophilia, 37 had 1 or more thrombophilia and 75 had no thrombophilia identified. Twenty-six patients received heparin and 11 received argatroban. There were no differences in recipient age, cold storage time, graft loss, HLA match, rejection episodes, 1-year graft survival, or serum creatinine level at 1 year. Significant differences were noted in posttransplantation bleeding, 35% versus 5%, and delayed graft function, 32% versus 15%, in patients with thrombophilia versus no thrombophilia, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that there is no increase in rejection or graft loss in kidney transplant recipients with thrombophilia when treated with anticoagulation and triple immunosuppression.     

Primary immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and antithymocyte globulin for kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal graft

Background. In renal transplantation the beneficial immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin (CsA) may be curtailed by its nephrotoxicity, specially in patients receiving a cadaveric allograft from suboptimal donors or at risk of delayed graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have each demonstrated to be potent immunosuppressants in renal transplantation. In a prospective analysis we have studied the results at 6 months of the combination of MMF, ATG and low-dose steroids in patients with low immunological risk receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft from a suboptimal donor or at risk of delayed graft function. Methods. Patients with preformed reactive antibodies <50% receiving a first graft from a suboptimal donor (age ⩾40years, non-heart-beating, acute renal failure, arterial hypertension) or at risk of delayed graft function (cold ischaemia time ⩾24 h) were eligible for this open single-arm pilot trial. From September 1996 to March 1997 we recruited 17 patients. They were treated with MMF 2 g p.o. preoperatively, and after transplantation at 3 g/day; rabbit ATG i.v. at 2 mg/kg preoperatively, and 1.5 mg/kg/day the first day after transplantation, followed by four doses of 1 mg/kg on alternate days; prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day and reduced progressively to 0.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months. Primary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, delayed graft function, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and the need for introduction of CsA treatment. Results. Delayed graft function occurred in two cases (12%). Four of 17 patients (27%) had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (2 grade I and 2 grade II) within the first 3 months after transplantation. CsA was added in two cases with grade II biopsy-proven acute rejection, and in one with grade I biopsy-proven acute rejection. In one patient MMF was replaced by CsA because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Mean serum creatinine 6 months after transplantation was 159±59 &mgr;mol/l. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease occurred in one patient (6%). At 6 months follow-up all patients are alive with functioning allografts. Conclusions. These preliminary results suggest that in low-immunological-risk patients who receive a suboptimal renal allograft or at risk of delayed graft function, the combination of MMF, ATG, and steroids is an efficient immunosuppressive regime that may avoid the use of CsA in 70% of the recipients.     

个体化免疫抑制治疗在肾移植的疗效观察

目的：探讨个体化免疫抑制治疗对肾移植患者的临床价值。方法：将肾移植患者分为个体化组(42例)和常规组(50例),分别采用个体化免疫抑制治疗和常规免疫抑制治疗,并对术后两组的临床指标进行比较。结果：个体化组比较常规组,术后肝功能损害、高血糖、胃肠功能紊乱、呼吸系统感染、急性排斥反应发生率均明显降低(P＜0．05);而巨细胞病毒感染发生率及移植肾切除人数无差异(P＞0．05)。结论：个体化免疫抑制治疗既能维持免疫抑制效果,又能最大限度减少药物不良反应,对肾移植患者有较好治疗价值。     

移植肾急性排斥反应136例次治疗

我院自１９７８年４月至１９９３年３月，在尸体肾移植４７５例次中，发生移植肾急性排斥反应１３６例次，发生率为２８．６％。应用甲基强的松龙冲击治疗，急性排斥逆转率为７０．６％。单克隆抗体ＯＫＴ治疗逆转率为８３．９％，其中进口ＯＫＴ３逆转率达９２．３％。本文对其治疗方法作扼要讨论。     

Clinical determinants of multiple acute rejection episodes in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Recipients with multiple (more than one) acute rejection (AR) episodes have significantly lower graft survival rates than those with no AR or only one treated episode. However, fewer than 50% of recipients treated for one AR episode will have another episode. METHODS: We studied recipients with at least one AR episode to determine whether any clinical features could identify risk factors for multiple AR. RESULTS: Between January 1, 1984, and June 30, 1997, a total of 1793 recipients underwent a kidney transplant at our institution. Of these, 354 were treated for one AR episode, 307 for more than one. By multivariate analysis, recipients at highest risk for multiple AR episodes were those with initial delayed or slow graft function (relative risk=1.5, P=0.05), those with initially severe AR (as judged by vascular involvement or steroid resistance), and those with an initial early AR episode (<6 months posttransplant). The remaining variables tested were not significant. Graft survival in recipients with more than one AR episode was significantly lower than in those with only one AR episode. Graft survival at 5 years posttransplant was 52.5% in recipients with more than one AR episode and 85.1% in recipients with one AR episode (P=0.0001). Chronic rejection as a cause of graft loss was significantly more common in recipients with more than one vs. only one AR episode (34.8% vs. 8.9%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Clinical features may be used to identify recipients at higher risk for multiple AR episodes. These recipients can then be targeted with more aggressive or novel immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to reduce the likelihood of another AR episode.     

国产AHTG在治疗肾移植术后排斥反应中的应用

从１９９４年５月－１９９６年２月间应用猪抗人胸腺淋巴细胞球蛋白治疗肾移植术后排斥反应１９例。结果１７例完全逆转，血脂酐降至１５０μｍｏｌ／Ｌ以下；１例无效；另１例并发巨细胞病毒肺炎死亡。指出在肾移植术后发生排斥反应的早期应用ＡＨＴＧ疗效最为满意。     

Steroid avoidance immunosuppression in low-risk kidney transplant recipients

Recent clinical trials have documented the short-term safety of steroid avoidance (SA) in kidney transplant recipients. Since July 2003, we have used a SA immunosuppression protocol for low-risk kidney transplant recipients. Eligibility criteria are age > or = 18, primary transplant (living or deceased donor), and tacrolimus started by postoperative day 3. Recipients were excluded if peak/current PRA was >50%/20%, or if they had a positive flow crossmatch, or if they had the recent use of corticosteroids (<6 months). All recipients received induction with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, total dose 6 mg/kg, or basiliximab. Recipients received 5 daily doses of corticosteroid and mycophenolate mofetil 1 gm twice daily starting on the day of transplantation. Tacrolimus was started when the serum creatinine level decreased by 20%, or by postoperative day 3. The goal for trough tacrolimus levels was 10-15 ng/mL for the first month, 8-12 ng/mL for months 2-3, and 5-10 ng/mL after month 3. Protocol biopsies (bx) were performed at reperfusion, 1 month, 4 months, and 12 months. Ninety-four kidney transplantations were performed during the study period. Sixty-seven recipients (71%) were eligible and enrolled in SA. Characteristics of the 67 SA recipients: mean age, 53 years (range, 26-70); 41% female; 67% Caucasian; 24% Hispanic; 15% African American; and 5% Native American. Also, 77% received a living donor kidney. The mean follow-up was 180 days (range, 10-360). At last follow-up, 91% remained steroid-free. Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred in 5 recipients (7.5%). Three recipients (4.5%) had clinical BPAR and 2 had subclinical. One recipient died with pneumonia 4 months following transplantation. Posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) occurred in 2 (5%) of 38 recipients. In the initial 41 recipients, 27 had protocol bx at 1 month and 13 at 4 months available for analysis. Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was present on protocol bx in 48% at 1 month and 69% at 4 month. Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier method) patient and graft survival rates at 351 days were 97.8% and 96.8%, respectively. SA with anti-thymocyte globulin induction in low-immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients is safe and is associated with a low risk of BPAR. The incidence of PTDM appears to be lower.     

Acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients

Antibody-mediated rejection has now been recognized as one of the most important causes of graft loss. Transplantation across HLA barriers and nonadherence can result in acute antibody-mediated rejection, which is associated with particularly worse graft outcomes. New technologies, including genomic studies and assays to detect and define donor-specific antibodies, have provided important insights into the pathophysiology and diagnosis of acute antibody-mediated rejection but have engendered many questions about the clinical application of these tests in the prognosis and prevention of this protean disease process. In this article, we review the pathophysiology of acute antibody-mediated rejection, the evolving diagnostic criteria, and specific challenges related to its prognosis, treatment, and prevention.     

Single bolus antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation with cyclosporine triple immunosuppression: efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to examine the effect of induction immunosuppression and low initial cyclosporine (CsA) on the onset of graft function and its long-term consequences. METHODS: During 1999-2001, 155 patients were randomized to single 9 mg/kg dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-Fresenius (group A) or two 20-mg doses of basiliximab (group B) with reduced dose CsA or conventional CsA triple therapy without induction (group C). RESULTS: Delayed function (DGF) was lower in group A than in groups B or C (5.7% vs. 24.1% and 15.9%, P<0.025) and need of dialysis was less in groups A and B compared to C (10.3 and 10.4 vs. 20.0 days, P<0.05). Acute rejections occurred in 11.3%, 12.1% and 20.5%, and the mean (median) time to rejection was 16 (13), 97 (46) and 101 (35) days in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.005). One-and 5-year graft survivals (GS) were 98.1% and 90.6% (group A), 96.6% and 96.6% (group B), and 93.2% and 84.1% (group C). Five-year GS was significantly better in group B than in group C (P<0.05). The death censored 5-year GS in groups A, B, and C were 94.3%, 96.6%, and 90.0% (P=NS). Single high-dose ATG induction was associated with hemodynamic and pulmonary disturbances without, however, serious or long-term consequences. CONCLUSIONS: ATG induction significantly reduced DGF. Both induction regimens together with low initial CsA led to significantly less posttransplant dialysis and excellent survival. The high dose ATG was associated with significant hemodynamic and pulmonary side effects during drug infusion.     

A comparison of daclizumab to ATGAM induction in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients on triple maintenance immunosuppression

Daclizumab (DAC) is a molecularly engineered humanized IgGa monoclonal Ab directed against the alpha chain of the interleukin‐2 receptor (IL2R). Inhibiting the amplification of the immune response by blocking IL2R can reduce the frequency of acute rejection without the attendant risk of infection.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare DAC to anti‐thymocyte (ATGAM) induction in 24 simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplants performed between September 1995 and September 1998. The primary endpoints were the incidence within 6 months post‐transplant of: 1) biopsy‐proven acute rejection; and 2) infection. The two groups (DAC, n=12; ATGAM, n=12) were matched on age, race, ESRD, number of HLA mismatches, PRA level, and cold ischemia time. DAC (1 mg/kg) was given on the day of transplant, then every other week (a total of five doses); ATGAM (15 mg/kg) was given on post‐transplant day 1, then daily for 7–10 d. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of cyclosporine (Neoral®– 8–10 mg/kg/d) or Prograf® (0.16–0.2 mg/kg/d), mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept®– 2–3 g/d) and steroids.
Of the 12 DAC patients, 3 patients (25%) had biopsy‐proven acute rejection versus 8/12 (67%) of the ATGAM patients. The time to acute rejection was significantly different by group (DAC=110 d; ATGAM=26 d). There was a reduction in the number of patients receiving antilymphocyte drugs for moderate to severe rejection (DAC=2/12; ATGAM=4/12), with 2 of the 4 ATGAM patients experiencing more than two episodes of biopsy‐proven rejection. There was an increase in infection by group (DAC=4/12; ATGAM=7/12): total of three septic infections occurred in the ATGAM group opposed to none in the DAC group. Patient, pancreas, kidney 6‐month survival rates were 100% for both groups.
We conclude that DAC induction coupled with triple immunosuppressive therapy reduces the incidence of rejection in SPK transplant patients. The time to acute rejection was prolonged in the DAC group compared with the ATGAM group without the attendant risks of rejection.