Bone loss rate in adrenal incidentalomas: a longitudinal study.

Although by definition patients with adrenal incidentalomas (AI) do not have evident clinical syndromes, they may frequently suffer from subclinical hypercortisolism (SH). This is of some importance because of evidence that SH may lead to clinical complications, including bone loss. Thus, the understanding of bone involvement due to SH may be extremely important in the management of AI. Unfortunately, the available data on bone mineral density (BMD) in AI patients come from cross-sectional studies, which, to further complicate our understanding, are also conflicting, probably due to a different selection of patients and/or the variability in cortisol secretion (CS) often described in AI. To gain further insight about this topic, we performed a longitudinal study evaluating the rate of spinal and femoral bone loss levels in 24 females with AI. AI subjects were subdivided in two groups on the basis of the median of urinary cortisol secretion (UFC): group I (n = 12; UFC, <140.4 nmol/24 h) and group II (n = 12; UFC, >140.4 nmol/24 h). Spinal BMD was measured by both single energy quantitative computed tomography (L1-L4) and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA; L2-L4), and femoral BMD was determined by DXA. Bone loss rate was expressed as the change in z-score per yr. The spinal bone loss rate was higher (P < 0.005) in group II than in group I when measured by both quantitative computed tomography (-0.19 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.00 +/- 0.15) and DXA (-0.19 +/- 0.17 vs. 0.00 +/- 0.11). Moreover, CS and spinal bone loss rate were significantly correlated when patients were considered together. In conclusion, our data show that 1) AI patients with higher CS have increased lumbar trabecular bone loss rate than those with lower CS; and 2) the degree of spinal bone loss rate is related to the degree of CS. Thus, lumbar spine (LS) BMD has to be evaluated for well balanced decision-making on the treatment of choice for AI female patients.     

Alendronate in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroid-related osteoporosis: a 2-year study

We investigated the effect of alendronate on calcium, PTH, and bone mineral density in 27 female and 5 male patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. The treatment group [n = 14; T score < or = -2.5 SD at the femoral neck (FN) or T < or = -1.0 SD plus previous nonvertebral fracture] was given alendronate 10 mg/d for 24 months. The second group (n = 18; T score > -2.5 SD at the FN) was untreated. Biochemistry was repeated at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at 12 and 24 months. There were no significant between-group baseline differences in calcium, creatinine, or PTH. Alendronate-treated patients gained bone at all sites [lumbar spine (LS), 1 yr gain, +7.3 +/- 1.7%; P < 0.001; 2 yr, +7.3 +/- 3.1%; P = 0.04). Untreated patients gained bone at the LS over 2 yr (+4.0 +/- 1.8%; P = 0.03) but lost bone elsewhere. Calcium fell nonsignificantly in the alendronate group between baseline (2.84 +/- 0.12 mmol/liter) and 6 wk (2.76 +/- 0.09 mmol/liter), with a nonsignificant rise in PTH (baseline, 103.5 +/- 14.6 ng/liter; 6 wk, 116.7 +/- 15.6 ng/liter). By 3 months, values had reverted to baseline. In primary hyperparathyroidism, alendronate is well tolerated and significantly improves bone mineral density at the LS (with lesser gains at FN and radius), especially within the first year of treatment. Short-term changes in calcium and PTH resolve by 3 months.     

Spinal volumetric bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in female patients with adrenal incidentalomas: the effects of subclinical hypercortisolism and gonadal status

Although adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are not associated with clinically evident syndromes, some patients display biochemical features of subclinical hypercortisolism (SH). Previous studies indicated a negative effect of SH on bone in AI patients, but the prevalence of vertebral fractures and the roles of SH and gonadal status in volumetric bone mineral density are unknown. In 70 female AI patients and 84 controls, the prevalence of vertebral fractures and spinal bone mineral density (by quantitative computed tomography) were evaluated. Subjects were subdivided according to menopausal status into groups Pre (21 patients and 23 controls) and Post (49 patients and 61 controls); there were 14 and 35 patients without SH (SH(-)) and 7 and 14 patients with SH (SH(+)) in groups Pre and Post, respectively. The prevalence of fractures was higher in SH(+) than in controls and in SH(-) subjects in both groups Pre [SH(+), 42.9%; controls, 0% (P = 0.001); SH(-), 7.1% (P = 0.049)] and post [SH(+), 78.6%; controls, 37.7% (P = 0.006); SH(-) 42.9% (P = 0.024)]. In group Post, the mean z-score quantitative computed tomography values were lower in SH(+) patients (-0.78 +/- 0.29) than in controls (0.06 +/- 0.14; P = 0.011) and SH(-) patients (0.02 +/- 0.19; P = 0.034). Evaluation of spinal bone is indicated in female AI patients with SH.     

Salmon calcitonin nasal spray in the prevention of corticosteroid- induced osteoporosis

The objectives were to determine the efficacy and safety of nasal salmon calcitonin 200 IU daily in the prevention of corticosteroid- induced osteoporosis. A minimized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in corticosteroid-treated patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. The setting was a tertiary care university- affiliated hospital and a total of 31 patients were enrolled. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in the two treatment groups from baseline to 1 yr of follow-up. The mean +/- S.D. bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in the calcitonin-treated group decreased by 1.29 +/- 6.76% and in the placebo group by 4.95 +/- 3.50% after 12 months. The observed difference of 3.65 +/- 2.10% between groups is statistically significant (P < 0.05). Nasal salmon calcitonin prevented loss of bone in the lumbar spine as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.      

Single-site vs multisite bone density measurement for fracture prediction

BACKGROUND: Bone density measurement with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry is widely used for fracture risk assessment. Discordance between measurement sites is common, but it is unclear how this affects fracture prediction. METHODS: We performed a historical cohort study among 16 505 women 50 years or older at the time of baseline dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the spine and hip (mean +/- SD observation period, 3.2 +/- 1.5 years). The study population was drawn from a database that contains all clinical dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry test results for the province of Manitoba, Canada. Each subject's longitudinal health service record was assessed for the presence of fracture codes after bone density testing. The likelihood ratio test was used to assess the improvement in fracture prediction from Cox proportional hazards models using bone density covariates from a single site or from combined sites. RESULTS: Age-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) per standard deviation for osteoporotic fracture ranged from 1.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-1.87) for the lumbar spine to 1.85 (95% CI, 1.70-2.01) for the total hip, with intermediate values for the femur neck (HR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.62-1.92]) and trochanter (HR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.63-1.92]). For fracture prediction, use of the minimum bone density measurement was no better than use of a hip measurement alone. When the total hip measurement was included in a fracture prediction model for the overall population, none of the other measurements added substantial information. The spine was the most useful site for the prediction of spine fractures alone. CONCLUSIONS: Proximal femur bone density measurements consistently outperformed lumbar spine measurements for global fracture prediction. In this cohort, the total hip was the best site for overall fracture assessment.     

Whole body and regional bone mineral density in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVE: To study the regional distribution of bone mass and look for factors leading to bone loss in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients, all men, aged 20 to 55 years and presenting with AS were studied. Four hundred sixteen gendarmes, all men aged 20 to 55 years, formed an age matched control population used to define standard values for bone mineral density (BMD) in men. The patients with AS and the controls underwent measurement of whole body BMD and regional BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: AS was associated with spinal bone loss, with lumbar spine BMD (LSBMD) 1.085 +/- 0.178 g/cm2 in the AS group compared with 1.232 +/- 0.136 g/cm2 in the control group (p < 0.01). Whole body BMD and regional BMD of head, whole spine, pelvis, and legs were reduced, although this was not statistically significant. Using standard values for LSBMD from the controls, we found that 46% (18/39) of patients with AS had Z score < -1.5 SD. Biological markers of disease activity were higher in the subgroup of patients with low LSBMD than in the subgroup with normal LSBMD, with an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 29.4 +/- 23.4 mm/h versus 12.1 +/- 10.8 mm/h (p < 0.05) and C-reactive protein at 24.8 +/- 18 mg/l versus 12.7 +/- 14.2 mg/l (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: AS is associated with bone loss, mainly concerning the lumbar spine, in patients whose disease is biologically most active.     

Lack of deleterious effect on bone mineral density of long-term thyroxine suppressive therapy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma

The effect of subclinical hyperthyroidism on bone mineral density is controversial and could be significant in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who receive suppressive doses of levothyroxine (LT4). To ascertain whether prolonged treatment with LT4 to suppress thyrotropin had a deleterious effect on bone mineral density and/or calcium metabolism in patients thyroidectomized for differentiated thyroid cancer we have performed a cross-sectional study in a group of 88 women (mean +/- SD age: 51 +/- 12 years) treated with LT4 after near-total thyroidectomy and in a control group of 88 healthy women (51 +/- 11 years) matched for body mass index and menopausal status. We determined calcium metabolism parameters, bone turnover marker N-telopeptide and bone mass density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. No differences were found between patients and controls in calcium metabolism parameters or N-telopeptide except for PTH, which was significantly increased in controls. No differences were found between groups in bone mineral density in femoral neck (0.971 +/- 0.148 gr/cm(2) vs 0.956 +/- 0.130 gr/cm(2) in patients and controls respectively, P = 0.5). In lumbar spine, bone mineral density values were lower in controls than in patients (1.058 +/- 0.329 gr/cm(2) vs 1.155 +/- 0.224 gr/cm(2) respectively, P < 0.05). When premenopausal (n = 44) and postmenopausal (n = 44) patients were compared with their respective controls, bone mineral density was similar both in femoral neck and lumbar spine. The proportion of women with normal bone mass density, osteopenia and osteoporosis in patient and control groups was similar in pre- and postmenopausal women. In conclusion, long-term suppressive LT4 treatment does not appear to affect skeletal integrity in women with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.     

Importance of estrogen on bone health in Turner syndrome: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Osteoporosis and fractures are features in adults with Turner syndrome (TS). Using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, correcting bone mineral content (BMC) for height and lean mass (LTM) avoids misclassification of short children as osteopenic. Total body (TB), lumbar spine (LS), and femoral neck (FN) dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans were performed on 83 patients with TS (aged 4-24 yr). A prepubertal subgroup (n = 17) receiving GH was followed for 24 months. Age z-scores for height, TB BMC, LTM, the BMC/LTM ratio, and LS volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) decreased significantly (P < 0.001) with age in prepubertal subjects (n = 51) but were constant in the combined pubertal and postmenarchal group (n = 32). Osteopenia was found in 14.5% (TB), 15.8% (LS), and 28.4% (FN) of patients. In the longitudinal subgroup, TB BMC z-scores decreased by -0.28 (0.31) in subjects remaining prepubertal (n = 11) but increased by 0.71 (0.56) in subjects entering puberty (n = 6; P = 0.007). The z-scores for height and LTM increased in both groups. Our results show a height-independent prepubertal decrease in bone mass accrual, which ceased with puberty. Optimizing bone mass in TS may require earlier induction of puberty than currently recommended. However, reduced FN volumetric bone mineral density and a dissociation of bone and muscle measures were age independent, suggesting an additional intrinsic bone defect.     

Alendronate increases lumbar spine bone mineral density in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a common complication of Crohn's disease and may lead to increased morbidity and mortality because of fractures. We investigated the effect of treatment with the bisphosphonate alendronate on bone mass and markers of bone remodeling in patients with Crohn's disease. METHODS: A 12-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial examined the effect of a 10-mg daily dose of alendronate. Thirty-two patients with a bone mass T score of -1 of the hip or lumbar spine were studied. The main outcome measure was the difference in the mean percent change in BMD of the lumbar spine measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcome measures included changes in BMD of the hip and total body and biochemical markers of bone turnover (S-osteocalcin, urine pyridinoline, and urine deoxypyridinoline excretion). RESULTS: Mean (+/-SEM) BMD of the lumbar spine showed an increase of 4.6% +/- 1.2% in the alendronate group compared with a decrease of 0.9% +/- 1.0% in patients receiving placebo (P < 0.01). BMD of the hip increased by 3.3% +/- 1.5% in the alendronate group compared with a smaller increase of 0.7% +/- 1.1% in the placebo group (P = 0.08). Biochemical markers of bone turnover decreased significantly in the alendronate group (P < 0.001). Alendronate was well tolerated, and there was no difference in adverse events among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with alendronate, 10 mg daily, significantly increased BMD in patients with Crohn's disease and was safe and well tolerated.     

绝经后女性骨密度与中心脉压关系的探讨

<正>骨质疏松症是一种全身性的骨骼疾病,随着年龄的增大而日渐严重,特别在绝经后女性人群中,这种骨代谢异常表现得尤为显著。近年来,人们注意到伴随着钙代谢异常的骨质疏松症常伴有动脉血管钙化和硬化[1,2],提示两者之间可能存在着共同的发病机制。本文通过对155例绝经后女性骨密度和有创中心动脉压测定,旨在探讨绝经后女性人群骨密度降低与动脉硬化之间的关系,为这两种绝经后女性人群常见疾病的综合防治寻找科学的理论依据。     

Longitudinal analysis of bone mineral density in pre-menopausal female systemic lupus erythematosus patients: deleterious role of glucocorticoid therapy at the lumbar spine

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether bone loss occurs over time in pre-menopausal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal bone mineral density (BMD) analysis in a group of 35 pre-menopausal female SLE patients. Lumbar spine and hip (total and sub-regions) BMDs were measured twice 21 +/- 11 (mean +/- S.D.) months apart by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: In the whole cohort of SLE patients, significant bone loss was observed at the lumbar spine (-1.22%/yr) but not at the total hip. Further analyses indicated that lumbar spine bone loss (-2.12%/yr) occurred exclusively in the subgroup of patients who had taken a mean prednisolone daily dose >7.5 mg between the two BMD measurements. Moreover, bone loss was more important in patients who had previously received a cumulative prednisolone dose 7.5 mg.     

Are adult patients with Laron syndrome osteopenic? A comparison between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and volumetric bone densities

Severe short stature resulting from a deficiency in IGF-I is a prominent feature of Laron syndrome (LS). Although low bone mineral density (BMD) has been noted in LS patients examined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), this technique does not take volume into account and may therefore underestimate the true bone density in patients with small bones. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the BMD yielded by DEXA in our LS patients using estimated volumetric values. Volumetric density was calculated with the following formulas: bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) = bone mineral content (BMC)/(area)(3/2) for the lumbar spine and BMAD = BMC/area(2) for the femoral neck. The study sample included 12 patients (mean age, 43.9 yr; mean height, 123.7 cm). Findings were compared with 10 osteopenic subjects without developmental abnormalities (mean age, 56 yr; mean height, 164.8 cm) and 10 healthy control subjects matched for sex and age to the LS patients (mean height, 165.5 cm). BMAD in the LS group was 0.201 +/- 0.02 g/cm(3) at the lumbar spine and 0.201 +/- 0.04 g/cm(3) at the femoral neck; corresponding values for the osteopenic group were 0.130 +/- 0.01 and 0.140 +/- 0.01 g/cm(3), and for the controls, 0.178 +/- 0.03 and 0.192 +/- 0.02 g/cm(3). Although areal BMD was significantly lower in the LS and osteopenic subjects compared with controls (P < 0.02) at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck, BMAD was low (P < 0.01) in the osteopenic group only. In conclusion, DEXA does not seem to be a reliable measure of osteoporosis in patients with LS.     

Effects of treatment with GH alone or in combination with LHRH analog on bone mineral density in pubertal GH-deficient patients.

The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of treatment with GH with or without LHRH analog (LHRH-A) on bone mineralization of GH-deficient adolescents. We studied 17 pubertal, treatment-naive, GH-deficient patients (10 girls and 7 boys) in a prospective, randomized trial. Mean chronological age and mean bone age were 14.1 +/- 0.4 and 11.3 +/- 0.3 yr, respectively, at the beginning of the study. Treatment with GH + LHRH-A (n = 7) or GH alone (n = 10) started simultaneously. Nutropin was administered at a dose of 0.1 U/kg per day sc until patients reached near final height (NFH), defined as a bone age of 14 yr in girls and 16 yr in boys. Mean time of GH therapy in the patients treated with GH+LHRH-A was 4.8 +/- 0.5 yr and in the patients treated with GH alone 2.9 +/- 0.7 yr. Lupron was administered at a dose of 300 microg/kg every 28 d im for 3 yr. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed yearly by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and femoral neck at the beginning of the study, after 3 yr of hormonal therapy, and at NFH. Statistical analysis was performed by t test and ANOVA. We observed a significant increase in lumbar and femoral bone mineral content, BMD, SD score, and bone mineral apparent density, compared with baseline in both groups of patients, regardless of whether they were treated with GH alone or in combination with LHRH-A. The patients treated with GH + LHRH-A had a significantly lower bone mineral content after 3 yr of therapy. This difference, however, did not persist after both groups of patients reached NFH. These results indicate that delaying puberty with LHRH-A in GH-deficient patients treated with GH diminishes transient bone mineralization but does not appear to have a permanent impact on BMD.     

Impact on bone of an estrogen receptor-alpha gene loss of function mutation

CONTEXT: The kindred described is the only known instance of a germ line loss of function mutation of estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the impact of a loss of function mutation in the ER-alpha gene on histomorphometry, bone volumetric density, bone geometry and skeletal growth, and ER-alpha heterozygosity on spine density and adult height in an extended pedigree. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A longitudinal follow-up of the propositus with homozygous loss of function mutation of ER-alpha and single contact evaluation of the kindred were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Iliac crest bone biopsy and peripheral quantitative computed tomography of propositus with serial measures of areal spine bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bone age were performed. Members of pedigree were evaluated for ER-alpha mutation carrier status and spine aBMD. RESULTS: Bone biopsy revealed marked osteopenia (cortex: 641 microm), low trabecular volume (10.6%), decreased thickness (76.2 microm), normal trabecular number, and low activation frequency (0.099/yr). Radial periosteal circumference was similar, endosteal circumference larger, and trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral density markedly lower (158 and 1092 mg/cm(3), respectively) than controls. Spine aBMD at age 28.5 yr (0.745 g/cm(2)) decreased to 0.684 g/cm(2) (Z score -3.85) in 3.5 yr. Bone age advanced from 15-17.5 yr. Kindred analysis revealed that gene carriers had spine aBMD Z scores less than zero (P = 0.003), but carriers and nonmutant members were similar (-0.84 +/- 0.26 vs. -0.64 +/- 0.16). CONCLUSION: Homozygous ER-alpha disruption markedly affects bone growth, mineral content, and structure but not periosteal circumference. ER-alpha heterozygosity appears to not impair spine aBMD.     

Effect of alendronate on bone mineral density in male idiopathic osteoporosis

Idiopathic osteoporosis in men is an increasingly recognized disorder accounting for up to 200,000 hip fractures worldwide each year. Although there is no widely accepted or proven efficacious treatment for men with idiopathic osteoporosis, we attempted to examine the effectiveness of alendronate in this disorder. We retrospectively compared the clinical records of male patients with osteopenia (hip or spine T scores less than -1.0, with or without low-trauma fractures) treated either with alendronate 10 mg orally/day and calcium and vitamin D replacement versus conservative treatment with calcium and vitamin D alone. Review included analysis of laboratory studies and bone turnover markers in a subset of patients. We documented bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and repeated BMD after an average follow-up of 1.9 and 2.7 years in the alendronate-treated and conservative treatment groups, respectively. At baseline, conservatively-treated and alendronate-treated patients had similar BMD at the lumbar spine and hip. Over the period of observation, the conservatively-treated patients exhibited insignificant changes in BMD at all measured sites. In contrast, alendronate treatment resulted in a significant increase in BMD of the spine (+4.6%, P =.002), trochanter (+6.4%, P =.002), and total hip (+4.7%, P =.002). Indeed, compared with conservative treatment, alendronate-treated patients sustained a significant annualized percent increment of the BMD in the spine (2.7 +/- 0.6 v 1.1 +/- 0.3, P =.025), trochanter (4.7 +/- 1.7 v 0.7 +/- 0.6, P =.025), and total hip BMD (3.3 +/- 0.9 v 0.1 +/- 0.4, P =.0009). These data are among the first that illustrate the potential efficacy of alendronate in the management of idiopathic osteoporosis in men.     

The effect of cessation of growth hormone (GH) therapy on bone mineral accretion in GH-deficient adolescents at the completion of linear growth

In many countries, treatment of childhood-onset GH deficiency (GHD) with GH ceases when linear growth is complete. Peak bone mass occurs several years after the completion of linear growth. Given that GH has important anabolic actions on bone, discontinuation of GH therapy at the completion of linear growth may have adverse consequences for the attainment of peak bone mass in adolescent GHD patients. In this United Kingdom multicenter study, 24 adolescents (13 males, mean age 17.0 +/- 1.4 yr, SD) with severe GHD were randomized to discontinue or continue GH (0.35 IU/kg x wk) at the completion of linear growth. Whole body bone mineral content (BMC) and lumbar spine bone mineral density were assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and then at 6-month intervals for 1 yr. Markers of bone remodeling (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and urinary deoxypyridinoline) were measured at the same time points. In patients who continued GH (GH+), median BMC increased by 3.8% (interquartile range, 2.6, 5.9, P < 0.001) at 6 months; and by 6.0% (3.7-9.1, P < 0.001) at 12 months. In patients who discontinued GH (GH-) median BMC was unchanged at 6 and 12 months (+1.9%, -0.4-4.2, P = 0.9; and +2.4%, 0.4-4.9, P = 0.5, respectively, median, interquartile range). The differences in median change in BMC between the two groups at 6 and 12 months was marginally significant (P = 0.085 and 0.074, respectively). Mean lumbar spine bone mineral density increased by 4.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.0, 8.2) at 12 months in patients continuing GH (P = 0.01), but the mean change was not statistically significant change in patients who discontinued GH [+2.7% (95% confidence interval, -0.8, +6.2)]. These preliminary data suggest that, in adolescent patients with severe GHD, discontinuation of GH at completion of growth may limit the attainment of peak bone mass in this patient group. This may predispose to clinically significant osteopenia in later adult life.     

Bone density and bone metabolism are normal after long-term gluten-free diet in young celiac patients

OBJECTIVES: Osteoporosis and alterations of bone metabolism are frequent complications of celiac disease. We evaluated the impact of long-term gluten-free diet (GFD) initiated during childhood and adolescence on bone mineralization and bone metabolism. METHODS: We studied 30 celiac patients on GFD for > or = 5 yr. The mean age at diagnosis was 11.4+/-5.0 yr, and the mean duration of GFD was 10.7+/-4.3 yr. Results were compared with those obtained in 240 healthy controls. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lumbar spine and in the whole skeleton by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) were measured as bone formation indices, and urine levels of N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) as bone resorption index. RESULTS: BMD measurements of celiac patients (lumbar spine: 1.131+/-0.121 g/cm2; total body: 1.145+/-0.184 g/cm2) did not differ from those of control subjects (lumbar spine: 1.131+/-0.184 g/cm2; total body: 1.159+/-0.118 g/cm2). The levels of BALP, PINP, and NTx of celiac patients did not differ from those of controls. Patients who started GFD before puberty had BMD and bone metabolism measurements comparable to those of patients who started GFD during puberty. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that long-term dietary treatment ensures normal mineralization and bone turnover.     

Bone densitometry in patients with multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE, PATIENTS, AND METHODS: We performed dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 10 selected patients with aggressive multiple myeloma in whom substantial tumor mass reduction was achieved after high-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: In most cases, bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was initially low (Mean Z score: -2.69, SEM 0.76) and dramatically increased after treatment (mean increase 16.4%; 7.7% with 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 12.2, excluding one patient whose spine BMD increased by 94.8%). In contrast, skeletal roentgenograms, computed tomographic scans, and magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal any significant improvement of patients' bone lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple myeloma, bone densitometry could be a useful way to assess the efficacy of treatment on bone status.     

Prospective assessment of body weight, body composition, and bone density changes in patients with spondyloarthropathy receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha treatment

OBJECTIVE: To determine the changes in body weight, body composition, and bone density in patients with spondyloarthropathy (SpA) receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) treatment. METHODS: One hundred six patients with SpA (80 men, 26 women) aged 20-71 years were included in a 2-year prospective open study. Fifty-nine patients received infliximab (3 or 5 mg/kg/infusion each 6 or 8 weeks); and 47 patients received etanercept (25 mg twice a week) because of persistent active disease despite an optimal treatment, according to ASsessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis Working Group criteria. Body weight, total body composition (lean mass, fat mass), and spine and femoral bone mineral density (BMD; dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) were measured at baseline and at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in body weight after 1 year (2.2 +/- 3.9 kg, i.e., 3.4%; p < 0.0001) and 2 years (2.2 +/- 4.7 kg, 3.5%; p < 0.0001), mostly due to a significant gain in fat mass at 1 year (1.4 +/- 2.6 kg, 12.1%; p < 0.0001) and 2 years (1.5 +/- 3.1 kg, 14.5%, p < 0.0001). Gain in lean mass was also significant at 1 year (0.8 +/- 2.2 kg, 1.9%; p < 0.0001) and 2 years (0.9 +/- 2.5 kg, 2%; p < 0.0001). At 2 years, lumbar spine and femur BMD increased: +5.8 +/- 13% (p < 0.0001) and +2.26 +/- 4.5% (p = 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: This 2-year prospective study showed a significant increase in body weight at 1 year and 2 years, mostly due to a gain in fat mass and a significant increase in BMD, in patients with SpA receiving anti-TNF-alpha treatment.     

Bone mass at final height in precocious puberty after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with and without calcium supplementation

The aim of our longitudinal study was to evaluate bone mass in girls affected by central precocious puberty (CPP) that have reached final height, treated with GnRH agonist triptorelin (GnRHa), with or without calcium supplementation. We studied 48 Caucasian females affected by CPP (age at diagnosis, 7.19 +/- 0.96 yr), randomly assigned to two groups: group A (n = 21) treated with GnRHa and group B (n = 27) treated with GnRHa plus calcium gluconolactate and carbonate (1 g calcium/day in two doses) for at least 2 yr. Auxological parameters (standing height, weight, body mass index) and bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine [L2-L4, anteroposterior (AP)-BMD; lateral BMD; volumetric (v)BMD)] by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were evaluated at the beginning [chronological age (CA), 7.29 +/- 0.91 yr; bone age (BA), 8.80 +/- 1.24 yr] and end of treatment (CA, 11.27 +/- 0.97 yr; BA, 12.35 +/- 0.43 yr) and at final height (CA, 16.17 +/- 1.9 yr; BA, 16.93 +/- 0.98 yr, in each case >15 yr). Total bone mineral content, total BMD, and fat percentage were evaluated at the end of the study period using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Final height was significantly higher than predicted height at diagnosis (159.9 +/- 6.3 cm vs. 152.9 +/- 9.6 cm; P < 0.05). Body mass index and fat percentage were not statistically different from control values. Densitometric values at final evaluation in groups A and B together were lower than in controls, but the differences were not statistically significant. The vBMD was significantly higher in group B than in group A at the end of treatment period (0.213 +/- 0.022 g/cm(3) vs. 0.192 +/- 0.021 g/cm(3); P < 0.01) and at final evaluation (0.246 +/- 0.023 g/cm(3) vs. 0.227 +/- 0.024 g/cm(3); P < 0.05). The percentage change (Delta%) between the start and end of treatment period in AP-BMD and vBMD was significantly higher in group B than in group A (Delta% AP-BMD: 20.36% +/- 1.10% vs. 16.16% +/- 1.90%, P < 0.01; Delta% vBMD: 19.08% +/- 3.52% vs. 9.26% +/- 5.15%; P < 0.01) and also between the start of treatment and final evaluation (Delta% AP-BMD: 61.23% +/- 1.61% vs. 56.97% +/- 1.45%, P < 0.01; Delta% vBMD: 36.69% +/- 5.01% vs. 28.01% +/- 5.76%, P < 0.01). In all our females with CPP treated with GnRHa, bone densitometric parameters were in the normal range for age and sex. However, bone mass achievement seemed to be better preserved in the group of patients supplemented with calcium.