Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in treatment-naïve ‘real-life’ patients in India

Purpose/Aim

Results of treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-RBV) are mainly available from well-designed clinical trials, and only few ‘real-life’ studies which give a true picture of success of therapy are available. Such data in Indian patients is scarce. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR) in Indian CHC patients treated with PEG-RBV in ‘real-life’ setting.

Material and Methods

All treatment-naïve patients with CHC/compensated cirrhosis treated with PEG-RBV between January 2004 and December 2010 were included.

Results

Of 592 patients started on treatment, 524 (88.5 %) completed therapy (mean?±?SD age—42.0?±?12.1 years; 74.3 % males). Genotype 3 (73.6 %) was the commonest, followed by genotype 1 (19.3 %). In intention to treat analysis, SVR rates for ‘all’ patients, genotype 1 and genotype 3 patients were 72.3 % (428/592), 57 % (65/114), and 78.2 % (341/436), respectively (in per-protocol analysis—81.7 %, 69.1 %, and 85.3 %, respectively). Noncirrhotics had better SVR rates compared to cirrhotics treated for the same duration. About 20 % patients had both low viral load and achieved rapid virological response (RVR). Factors significantly associated with SVR were age <40 years, absence of cirrhosis, RVR, and no reduction in interferon dose.

Conclusion

SVR rates in CHC patients treated in ‘real-life’ setting in India were better than those reported in western population. Therapy should be prolonged for patients with cirrhosis, while one-fifth of patients may qualify for abbreviated therapy. Factors significantly associated with SVR were age <40 years, absence of cirrhosis, RVR, and no reduction in interferon dose.     

Immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in treatment-nave and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C patients: The effect of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate the vaccination-induced anti-HBs seroconversion rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. Also to prospectively evaluate the seroconversion rates in CHC patients during pegylated interferon (PEG) plus ribavirin (RIB) treatment. METHODS: Seventy treatment-naive CHC patients (group A), 22 sustained virological responders-SVR following interferon (IFN) plus RIB treatment CHC patients (group B) and 121 healthy subjects (group C) had been participated in the same HBV vaccination schedule (20μg, 0-1-6 mo). Seroconversion was considered if anti-HBs levels were above 10 mIU/mL within 3 mo following the third dose of the vaccine. Moreover, we prospectively selected 30 non-cirrhotic CHC patients and evaluated them for the efficacy of the same vaccine schedule randomizing them in two groups: Group-1, 15 CHC patients received the first dose of the vaccine in parallel with the initiation of PEG plus RIB treatment and Group-2, 15 patients received the same vaccination schedule without concomitant treatment. Determination of anti-HBs was performed at mo 1, 2, and 7. Statistical analysis of data was based on ANOVA student's t-test and chi-square analysis (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 70 group A patients (82.85%), 20/22 group B (90.9%) and 112/121 healthy subjects (92.56%) had been seroconverted. The seroconversion rates were significantly higher in the control group than in treatment-naive CHC patients (P = 0.04). The corresponding rates were comparable between group A and group B CMC patients (P = 0.38). The vast majority of non-responders (10/14, 71.43%) had been infected by genotype-1 of HCV. The seroconversion rates were comparable between group 1 and 2 CHC patients at mo 1 (20% versus 26.7%, P = 0.67), mo 2 (46.7% vs 60%, P = 0.46) and mo 7 (86.7% versus 93.3%, P = 0.54) of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The immunogenicity of HBV vaccine seems to be lower in CHC patients compared to healthy subjects. SVR following IFN plus RIB treatment does not affect the antibody response to HBV vaccine. Infection by genotype-1 seems to negatively influence the seroconversion rates. Vaccination against HBV during PEG plus RIB combination treatment is not beneficial in terms of anti-HBs seroconversion rates.     

A randomized controlled trial of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (40 KD) or interferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin and amantadine vs interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C

Summary. We determined whether triple therapy comprising amantadine (AMA), ribavirin (RBV) and either peginterferon (PEG-IFN) α-2a or conventional IFN α-2a would improve sustained virological response (SVR) rates over dual therapy with IFN α-2a and RBV in patients with chronic HCV infection. A total of 362 treatment-naïve patients were randomized to 48 weeks of treatment with: PEG-IFN α-2a 180 μg/week (group A) or IFN α-2a 3 MU tiw (groups B and C). All patients received RBV 1000 or 1200 mg/day and those in groups A and B received AMA 200 mg/day. SVR was defined as an undetectable HCV RNA after 24 weeks of untreated follow-up. At the end of therapy, 74.4% (95% CI 0.66–0.82) of patients in group A were HCV RNA-negative compared with 42.5% (95% CI 0.33–0.50) of those in group B (P = 0.0001) and 48.8% (95% CI 0.40–0.56) of those in group C. SVR was achieved in a significantly greater proportion of patients in group A compared with groups B and C: 65.3% (95% CI 0.53–0.56), 33.3% (95% CI 0.25–0.41) and 44.6% (95% CI 0.36–0.53; P = 0.0001) respectively. In patients with genotype 1, SVR rates were 55.2, 22.8 and 28.8% with the three regimens respectively. Factors independently associated with SVR were HCV genotype 2 or 3, therapy with PEG-IFN, female gender and age. In treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C, triple therapy with PEG-IFN α-2a, RBV and AMA produces higher SVR than dual or triple therapy with conventional IFN α-2a.     

Kinetics of hepatitis C virus RNA load during pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin treatment in naïve genotype 1 patients

Background

Pegylated interferon given for 24 or 48 weeks constitutes the most effective initial therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. It has been shown that viral load at week 2 appears the best time for predicting response to treatment. The objectives of this study were to assess whether the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA viral decline is predictive of sustained virological response (SVR) and to determine the best time for predicting complete response in our cohort of naïve patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a (Peg-IFN alpha-2a) and ribavirin.

Results

Twenty patients treated with Peg-IFN alpha-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks were studied. Six months after the end of treatment, a SVR (negative HCV RNA measured by PCR six months after the end of therapy) was obtained in 9 patients. Samples were obtained before and at week 2, 4, 8, and 12. At the end of week 2, viral load decreased more than 1.39 log in 8 out of the 9 patients with SVR and in 1 out of the 11 other patients. When we considered the viral load reduction from baseline to each week of treatment, week 2 appeared to be the best point time for predicting SVR, with a sensitivity of 91% (95%CI: 59;99), a specificity of 89% (52;98), a positive predictive value of 91% (59;99) and a negative predictive value of 89% (57;98).

Conclusion

During treatment with Peg-IFN alpha-2a plus ribavirin in genotype 1 patients, when the main objective of the treatment is viral eradication, viral kinetics showed that week 2 appeared to be the best time point for predicting SVR. Our results must be further confirmed on a larger cohort.

     

A real-world impact of cost-effectiveness of pegylated interferon/ribavarin regimens on treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C patients in Taiwan

Treatments with pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) has been standard-of-care in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) (CHC) infection and reimbursed in Taiwan. However, the actual cost-effectiveness remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate a real-world cost-effectiveness for CHC patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV by using a clinical cohort with linkage to the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan. The total and itemized medical-care expenses of outpatient visits of 117 treatment-naïve CHC patients with linkage to the two million sampling of the National Health Insurance Research Database were collected. Four components of costs were assessed, including antiviral agents, nonantiviral agents, laboratory testing and consultation costs. The cost per sustained virological response (SVR) achieved was calculated to evaluate the cost-effectiveness. The average cost per treatment in 117 naïve Taiwanese CHC patients was $4620. With an overall SVR rate of 78.6%, the average cost per SVR was $5878. The average medical-care cost per treatment for 52 Genotype 1 (G1) patients was $5133, including $4420 for antivirals, $380 for nonantivirals, $302 for laboratory, and $78 for consultation, compared to $4209, $3635, $317, $233, and $56 for 65 Genotype 2 (G2) patients. With an SVR rate at 67.3% for G1 and 87.7% for G2 patients, the cost per SVR achieved was significantly higher in G1 patients than those in G2 patients ($7627 vs. $4799, p = 0.001). In the current study, we provided the real-world cost-effectiveness of PEG-IFN/RBV for treatment-naïve CHC patients. The genotype-specific cost-effectiveness could enhance decision-making for policy-makers in the coming era of directly acting antiviral therapy.     

Extended treatment duration for treatment naïve chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 late viral responders: a meta-analysis comparing 48 weeks vs 72 weeks of pegylated interferon and ribavirin

Summary. Patients with genotype I chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with late virological response to therapy have low sustained viral response (SVR) with standard 48 weeks of therapy and may benefit from extended therapy. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis of five studies to compare the outcome of 48 weeks vs 72 weeks treatment in treatment naïve chronic hepatitis C genotype I patients with late virological response. The end of treatment response with extended 72 weeks of treatment compared to standard 48 weeks of treatment was similar 48% and 56%, respectively, with pooled odds ratio (OR) (0.85; 95% CI 0.52–1.37). However, the SVR rates were higher with 72 weeks of treatment compared to 48 weeks treatment 32%vs 25% with pooled OR of 1.67 in favour of extended duration therapy (95% CI 1.16–2.40). This was because of lower relapse rates with extended duration therapy (35%vs 55%) with OR of 0.39 in favour of 72 weeks therapy (95% CI 0.25–0.61). There was no heterogeneity. No publication bias was noted as assessed by Egger’s test. Extending the treatment duration from 48 to 72 weeks in genotype 1 infected patients with late virological response improves SVR. Thus, therapy extension in genotype 1 late viral responders (LVR) may be a consideration to improve treatment response; however, the proportion of patients with LVR that might benefit from 72‐week therapy appears to be small.     

Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of interferon, ribavirin, and amantadine versus interferon, ribavirin, and placebo in treatment naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In this study, we compared the efficacy of triple therapy (interferon alfa, ribavirin, and amantadine) with standard therapy (interferon alfa and ribavirin) in treatment na?ve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, multicentre study, 85 patients (amantadine group) received a three drug regimen of interferon alfa-2b 3 million units three times per week, ribavirin 1000-1200 mg daily in divided doses, and amantadine 100 mg twice daily, and 86 patients (placebo group) received interferon alfa-2b, ribavirin, and identical placebo. Treatment was discontinued at 24 weeks if patients had detectable HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were followed for 24 weeks after completion of treatment. The primary end point was undetectable HCV-RNA by PCR at 24 weeks (sustained viral clearance) after completion of treatment. RESULTS: At the end of treatment, HCV RNA clearance was seen in 32.9% of the amantadine group and 38.4% of the placebo group (p=0.3). Sustained virological response was seen in 24.7% of the amantadine group and in 27.9% of the placebo group by intention to treat analysis; response rate was 30.4% and 34.8%, respectively, in those who completed 24 weeks of treatment. Poor response was seen in both groups among cirrhotics, African-Americans, genotype 1, and those with a higher viral load. By multivariate analysis, genotype 1, high viral load, and low serum albumin were the only predictors of poor response. Addition of amantadine to the standard regimen did not result in any unexpected side effects. CONCLUSION: Response to triple therapy of interferon alfa, ribavirin, and amantadine was similar to standard therapy of interferon alfa and ribavirin. Our results suggest that amantadine has no role in the management of HCV.     

Severe liver injury associated with simeprevir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy in a patient with treatment-naïve genotype 1b hepatitis C virus: a case report

A second-generation direct-acting antiviral agent, simeprevir, now provides a new treatment option for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with good safety profile in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. We herein report a rare case of severe liver injury under simeprevir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy. We initiated this therapy in a 65-year-old male with treatment-naïve genotype 1b HCV. On day 28, the patient’s HCV-RNA was successfully eliminated, and his liver function was fully restored. However, on day 49, the serum alanine aminotransferase level was elevated at 700 IU/L. The HCV-RNA titer was still undetectable and the involvement of other possible viruses was negligible. A liver biopsy performed on day 60 showed an acute hepatitis pattern. The discontinuation of therapy alone successfully improved his liver damage on day 84. No other treatments such as steroids were required. According to the diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury in Japan (DDW-J2004), the liver injury observed in this case can be associated with the administration of simeprevir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin therapy. In conclusion, simeprevir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin should be used with caution, as these agents may cause unreported serious adverse events including severe liver injury, despite their clinical safety profile.     

Phase III results in Genotype 1 na?ve patients: predictors of response with boceprevir and telaprevir combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin

The addition of telaprevir or boceprevir to pegylated interferon (PEG-INF) and ribavirin (RBV) has improved sustained viral response (SVR) rates in genotype-1-infected individuals. The recent publication of Phase III trials has made it possible to examine pretreatment and on-treatment predictors of response in genotype 1 na?ve patients. Both telaprevir- and boceprevir-based therapy improve SVR rates in most treatment groups including individuals who are difficult-to-treat such as those with a high viral load, Black patients and those with advanced fibrosis. Although data sets were not complete, patients with IL28B CT and TT genotype appear to significantly improve when these agents are combined with PEG-INF and RBV. The presence of the IL-28B CC genotype appears to be predictive for a short duration of therapy. On-treatment viral response is also predictive of the SVR: approximately half of the patients are successfully treated with short duration and response-guided therapy.     

Efficacy and safety of once-daily ritonavir-boosted darunavir and abacavir/lamivudine for treatment-naïve patients: a pilot study

The efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir and fixed-dose abacavir/lamivudine was examined in 22 treatment-na?ve patients with HIV-1 infection. Three patients discontinued antiretroviral therapy due to mild adverse events. Among 18 patients who continued therapy, 66.7% had viral load less than 50 copies/ml at week 48. Only two patients experienced virologic failure with the emergence of resistant virus. This pilot study demonstrated the viral efficacy and safety of darunavir/ritonavir and abacavir/lamivudine.     

Triple combination treatment for chronic hepatitis C with protease inhibitors, pegylated interferon and ribavirin: 'lead-in or no lead-in'?

Direct acting antiviral agents for the management of chronic hepatitis C infection have recently been licensed. These new protease inhibitors are combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin and markedly increase the proportion of patients who respond to antiviral therapy. The protease inhibitors may be used with a 'lead-in' phase of pegylated interferon and ribavirin and the value of this approach has been much debated with those supporting 'lead in' citing the advantages of assessing the early response to therapy before commencing the direct acting antiviral agent. Those opposed to the 'lead-in' phase cite the complexity of the regime and the lack of robust evidence showing an improvement in clinical outcome in those treated in this fashion.     

Efficacy of 5 MU of interferon in combination with ribavirin for naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In chronic hepatitis C the schedule of interferon (IFN), 3 MU thrice weekly (tiw) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/daily) needs further evaluation, as IFN dosages >3 MU achieve better responses. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of 5 MU tiw of IFN with (96 patients) or without ribavirin (96 patients) for 12 months in na?ve patients, to evaluate the effect of baseline features on the response to therapy, and to determine a reliable point in time during treatment to predict non-response. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response was 20.8% (95% CI 13-29) with IFN monotherapy and 54.2% (95% CI 44-64) with combination (P = 0.0001), the relapse rate 39.4% (95% CI 23-56) and 9% (95% CI 1-16) (P = 0.0007), and the combined rate of sustained biochemical and virologic response 22.7% (95% CI 14-31) and 60.5% (95% CI 50-71) (P = 0.0001), respectively. Patients given combination therapy were more likely to respond regardless of baseline features. Apart from genotype non-1, predictive factors for IFN monotherapy were ineffective in predicting response to combination therapy. Using logistic regression analysis, IFN-ribavirin was the strongest predictor of response (X2 = 21.3; P = 0.0001). Viral persistence at month 3 of therapy was a more accurate predictor than aminotransferase values for non-response to IFN monotherapy but not to combination therapy (positive predictive values of 98 and 82%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, 5 MU of IFN combined with a standard dose of ribavirin has yielded the highest rate of sustained response reported to date. Further dose finding studies are warranted.     

Robust improvements in fasting and prandial measures of beta-cell function with vildagliptin in drug-naïve patients: analysis of pooled vildagliptin monotherapy database

Aim: To assess the effects of 24‐week treatment with vildagliptin on measures of β‐cell function in a broad spectrum of drug‐naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods: Data from all double‐blind, multicentre, randomized, placebo‐ or active‐controlled trials conducted in drug‐naïve patients with T2DM were pooled from all patients receiving monotherapy with vildagliptin (100 mg daily: 50 mg twice daily or 100 mg once daily, n = 1855) or placebo (n = 347). Fasting measures of β‐cell function [homeostasis model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐B) and proinsulin : insulin ratio] were assessed in the overall pooled monotherapy population. Standard meal tests were performed at baseline and week 24 in a subset of patients, and effects of vildagliptin (100 mg daily, n = 227) on dynamic (meal test–derived) measures of β‐cell function [insulin secretion rate relative to glucose (ISR/G) and insulinogenic indices] were assessed relative to baseline and vs. placebo (n = 29). Results: In the overall population, vildagliptin significantly increased HOMA‐B both relative to baseline [adjusted mean change (AMΔ) = 10.3 ± 1.5] and vs. placebo (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = 11.5 ± 4.5, p = 0.01) and significantly decreased the proinsulin : insulin ratio relative to baseline (AMΔ = ?0.05 ± 0.01) and vs. placebo (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = ?0.09 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). Relative to baseline, vildagliptin monotherapy significantly increased all meal test–derived parameters, and ISR/G (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = 9.8 ± 2.8 pmol/min/m²/mM, p < 0.001) and the insulinogenic index_{0–peak glucose} (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = 0.24 ± 0.05 pmol/mmol, p = 0.045) were significantly increased vs. placebo. Conclusions: Vildagliptin monotherapy consistently produced robust improvements in both fasting and meal test–derived measures of β‐cell function across a broad spectrum of drug‐naïve patients with T2DM. All Phase III trials described (NCT 00099905, NCT 00099866, NCT 00099918, NCT 00101673, NCT 00101803 and NCT 00120536) are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.     

Once-daily simeprevir (TMC435) with peginterferon/ribavirin for treatment-naïve hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients in Japan: the DRAGON study

Background

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of simeprevir (TMC435), a once-daily, noncovalent, oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease inhibitor, was evaluated in combination with peginterferon α-2a/ribavirin (PegIFNα-2a/RBV) for treatment-naïve, HCV genotype 1-infected patients in Japan.

Methods

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial in Japan, ninety-two patients received either simeprevir (50 or 100 mg QD) for 12 or 24 weeks with PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 24 or 48 weeks (according to response-guided therapy [RGT] criteria), or PegIFNα-2a/RBV for 48 weeks (PR48 group).

Results

Compared with the PR48 group, plasma HCV RNA reductions in the simeprevir groups were rapid and more substantial (Week 4: ?5.2, ?5.2 and ?2.9 log₁₀IU/mL for simeprevir 50 mg combined, 100 mg combined, and PR48 groups, respectively). High rapid virologic response rates (83, 90, and 8 % for simeprevir 50 mg combined, 100 mg combined, and PR48 groups, respectively) led to high sustained virologic response rates (77–92 %, compared with 46 % for PR48). All but one of the simeprevir-treated patients were eligible to complete treatment after 24 weeks (RGT). Relapse rates in simeprevir-treated patients were low (8–17 %, compared with 36 % for the PR48 group). There were no notable differences in the safety profile between the simeprevir and PR48 groups.

Conclusions

The addition of simeprevir QD to PegIFNα-2a/RBV, as compared with PegIFNα-2a/RBV alone, demonstrated potent antiviral activity and significantly improved the rates of sustained virologic response, with a shortened 24-week treatment duration, in treatment-naive patients infected with HCV genotype 1 in Japan. Simeprevir was generally safe and well tolerated. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00996476).     

A comparison of clevudine and entecavir for treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B: results after 2 years of treatment

Background

This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy, safety, and resistance profile of clevudine (CLV) and entecavir (ETV) following a 2-year treatment period.

Methods

One hundred and eight Korean patients from the prior 48-week study were followed with continuous therapy for up to 2 years and monitored for hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, HBeAg seroconversion, serum ALT, emergence of drug-resistant mutant HBV, and drug-related adverse events.

Results

A complete virological response during the 2-year treatment period occurred in 68.0 % in the CLV group and in 84.5 % in the ETV group (p = 0.043). The cumulative percentage of patients with sustained virological responses at 2 years was 54.0 and 77.6 % in the CLV and ETV group, respectively (p = 0.010). Virological breakthrough occurred in 12 patients in the CLV group; however, there were none in the ETV group (p < 0.001). HBeAg seroconversion rates were not different between the two groups. In patients who maintained sustained virological responses at 2 years, the mean reduction in HBsAg titer was ?0.24 and ?0.06 log IU/ml in the CLV and ETV group, respectively (p > 0.05). Clinical myopathy occurred in seven patients in the CLV group; however, this was not observed in the ETV group (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

ETV was associated with a significantly higher virological response rate than CLV at 2 years. ETV was superior to CLV in terms of the drug resistance profile and the development of clinical myopathy. Further studies to see whether the unique characteristic of CLV to reduce HBsAg titer is associated with the removal of ccc-DNA from hepatocytes and the remission of the disease are needed.