Kappa-opioid system in uremic pruritus: multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies

Uremic pruritus is a very common and frustrating condition for both patients and clinicians because no treatment has been demonstrated to be effective in relieving the itch. In this report, nalfurafine, a new kappa-opioid receptor agonist, was used to treat uremic pruritus in patients who were undergoing routine hemodialysis. Two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies enrolled 144 patients with uremic pruritus to postdialysis intravenous treatment with either nalfurafine or placebo for 2 to 4 wk. A meta-analysis approach was used to assess the efficacy of nalfurafine. Statistically significant reductions in worst itching (P = 0.0212), itching intensity (P = 0.0410), and sleep disturbances (P = 0.0003) were noted in the nalfurafine group as compared with placebo. Improvements in itching (P = 0.0025) and excoriations (P = 0.0060) were noted for the nalfurafine-treated patients. Nalfurafine showed similar types and incidences of drug-related adverse events as did placebo. Nalfurafine was shown to be an effective and safe compound for use in this severely ill patient population.     

Naltrexone does not relieve uremic pruritus: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study

Improvement of uremic pruritus was reported under short-term administration of the mu-receptor antagonists naltrexone and naloxone. The aim of the present study was to confirm the efficacy and safety of the oral mu-receptor antagonist naltrexone during a 4-wk treatment period in patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. A placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study of uremic patients with persistent, treatment-resistant pruritus was performed. Of 422 patients screened between December 1997 and June 1998, 93 suffered from pruritus and 23 were eligible for the study. Patients were started either with a 4-wk naltrexone sequence (50 mg/d) or matched placebo. This was followed by a 7-d washout, and patients continued with a 4-wk sequence of the alternate medication. Pruritus intensity was scored daily by a visual analogue scale (VAS) and weekly by a detailed score assessing scratching activity, distribution of pruritus, and frequency of pruritus-related sleep disturbance. Sixteen of 23 patients completed the study. During the naltrexone period, pruritus decreased by 29.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.7 to 39.6) on the VAS and by 17.6% (95% CI, 4.2 to 31.1) on the detailed score. In comparison, pruritus decreased by 16.9% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.9) on the VAS and by 22.3% (95% CI, 9.3 to 35.2) on the detailed score during the placebo period. The difference between the naltrexone and the placebo treatment period was not statistically significant. Nine of 23 patients complained of gastrointestinal disturbances during the naltrexone period compared with only one of 23 patients during the placebo period (P < 0.05). These results show that treatment of uremic pruritus with naltrexone is ineffective. In addition, a high incidence of adverse effects was observed during treatment with naltrexone.     

Efficacy of uremic pruritus treatment in patients undergoing hemodialysis,a network meta-analysis for randomized clinical trials

IntroductionUremic pruritus is very common in hemodialysis or renal failure patients, there were lots of available treatments such as gabapentin, pregabalin, ondansetron, etc. However, there is no quantified study comparing these treatments together, it is impossible to conduct a clinical trial involving so many treatments, so we conduct a network meta-analysis to compare them.MethodWe collected mean difference and standard error of visual analogue scale data as outcome. In total we collected 15 articles, 15 articles, 1180 subjects and 6 treatments included to this study.ResultsIn these comparisons, gabapentin showed the largest effect MD: 5.19, 95% CI [3.77, 6.61], anti-histamine MD: 4.65, 95% CI [2.22, 7.07] and pregabalin MD: 4.62, 95%CI [2.71, 6.62] showed a similar effect. Opioid pathway related treatment also showed a significant but not so large effect MD: 2.45, 95% CI [0.41, 4.49]. Ondansetron and Doxepin didn’t show a significant improvement among placebo, the overall quantifying heterogeneity I² = 43.1%. There is no statically difference between gabapentin, pregabalin and anti-histamine treatments.ConclusionsSo we conclude that gabapentin, pregabalin and anti-histamine has a similar efficacy on pruritus control.     

Gabapentin therapy for pruritus in haemodialysis patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: Uraemic pruritus is a common and distressing symptom in patients on haemodialysis for chronic renal failure. Gabapentin is an anticonvulsant that alleviates neuropathic pain. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study to assess its effectiveness against renal itch. METHODS: We enrolled in the trial 25 adult patients on haemodialysis who were asked to daily record the severity of their pruritus on a visual analogue scale. The patients were randomly assigned to receive gabapentin for 4 weeks followed by placebo for 4 weeks or the reverse sequence. Gabapentin or placebo were administered thrice weekly, at the end of haemodialysis sessions. RESULTS: The mean pruritus score of the cohort before the study was 8.4 +/- 0.94. After placebo intake, it decreased to 7.6 +/- 2.6 (P = 0.098). The score of four patients decreased by >50% following placebo. After gabapentin administration, the mean score decreased significantly, to 1.2 +/- 1.8 (P = 0.0001), although one patient's symptoms did not improve significantly. No patient dropped out of the study due to adverse effects from gabapentin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that gabapentin is safe and effective for treating uraemic pruritus in haemodialysis patients. Our results also support the neuropathic hypothesis of uraemic pruritus.     

Becaplermin gel in the treatment of pressure ulcers: a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Pressure ulcers are associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the geriatric and spinal cord-injured populations. Newer pharmacologically active therapies include the use of topically applied recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (becaplermin), the active ingredient in REGRANEX) (becaplermin) Gel 0.01%, which has been approved in the United States for treatment of lower extremity diabetic neuropathic ulcers that extend into the subcutaneous tissue or beyond and have an adequate blood supply. In this study, the efficacy of becaplermin gel in the treatment of chronic full thickness pressure ulcers was compared with that of placebo gel. A total of 124 adults (>/= 18 years of age) with pressure ulcers were assigned randomly to receive topical treatment with becaplermin gel 100 microg/g (n = 31) or 300 microg/g (n = 32) once daily alternated with placebo gel every 12 hours, becaplermin gel 100 microg/g twice daily (n = 30), or placebo (sodium carboxymethylcellulose) gel (n = 31) twice daily until complete healing was achieved or for 16 weeks. All treatment groups received a standardized regimen of good wound care throughout the study period. Study endpoints were the incidence of complete healing, the incidence of >/= 90% healing, and the relative ulcer volume at endpoint (endpoint/baseline). Once-daily treatment of chronic pressure ulcers with becaplermin gel 100 microg/g or 300 microg/g significantly increased the incidences of complete and >/= 90% healing and significantly reduced the median relative ulcer volume at endpoint compared with that of placebo gel (p < 0.025 for all comparisons). Becaplermin gel 300 microg/g did not result in a significantly greater incidence of healing than that observed with 100 microg/g. Treatment with becaplermin gel was generally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse events was similar among treatment groups. In conclusion, once-daily application of becaplermin gel is efficacious in the treatment of chronic full thickness pressure ulcers.     

Growth hormone treatment in hemodialysis patients--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: Renal failure and hemodialysis (HD) affect the anabolic growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis. A positive correlation between serum IGF-I and normalized protein catabolic rate (PCRn) in HD patients has been reported, and the aim of this study was to assess the metabolic impact of recombinant human (rh)GH in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, rhGH was given to 35 HD patients for 8 weeks: 0.025 IU/kg/day for 1 week, increasing to 0.05 IU/kg/day. Patients with diabetes, malignancy or clinical signs of infection and those receiving steroid treatment were excluded. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. Side-effects were rare and equally distributed between the two groups. Post-treatment, serum IGF-I and IGF-I standard deviation score (IGF-I SD) increased in the rhGH group compared to the placebo group: 283+/-33 vs 151+/-16 mg/l (p = 0.001) and 1.8+/-0.6 vs -0.2+/-0.6 (p = 0.002), respectively. IGF binding protein-3 was higher in the rhGH group compared to the placebo group: 5859+/-285 vs 4369+/-321 mg/l (p = 0.002). PCRn was significantly higher in the rhGH group compared to the placebo group: 1.09+/-0.06 vs 0.90+/-0.06 g/kg/day (p = 0.029). No differences were found in body weight, serum albumin or leptin between the two groups. There was no change in C-reactive protein (CRP) in the rhGH group compared to the placebo group: 17.4+/-9.0 vs 12.3+/-4.6 mg/l (p = NS). When the patients were subgrouped according to the CRP level (< or > 10 mg/1), the effect on PCRn persisted only in rhGH-treated subjects with a normal CRP level: 1.10+/-0.08 vs 0.81+/-0.09 g/kg/day (p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Treatment of HD patients with rhGH at a moderate dose causes augmentation of PCRn which is considered to indicate a higher dietary protein intake. The anabolic effect of rhGH seems to be abolished by subclinical inflammation.     

血液透析病人皮肤瘙痒的研究进展

皮肤瘙痒是血液透析病人常见的合并症之一,其机制不甚明确,目前认为和肥大细胞、内源性阿片物质、皮肤干燥症、继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进、炎症和周围神经病变等相关。血液透析病人皮肤瘙痒的治疗分为局部治疗和全身治疗,包括紫外线光疗、皮肤软化剂、抗组胺药、辣椒碱、加巴喷丁等,但疗效都欠佳,需开展进一步的研究。     

Effect of cilostazol in patients with intermittent claudication: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of cilostazol 100 mg and 50 mg, both administered twice daily, with that of placebo in patients with moderately severe intermittent claudication (IC) secondary to peripheral arterial disease.A total of 394 subjects 40 years of age or older with chronic, stable, symptomatic IC received cilostazol 100 mg twice daily, 50 mg twice daily, or placebo for 24 weeks. Subjects receiving cilostazol 100 mg twice daily experienced a 21% net improvement in maximal walking distance (MWD)compared with placebo subjects (p = 0.0003) and a 22% net improvement in distance walked to the onset of symptoms (PFWD) (p = 0.0015). Subjects who received cilostazol 50 mg twice daily also benefited from therapy, but not to a statistically significant degree (7% and 11% improvement in MWD and PFWD, respectively). Quality-of-life and functional status assessments corroborated these objective results. Cilostazol, in particular 100 mg twice daily, significantly improves symptoms in patients with IC.     

Intravenous butorphanol administration reduces intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Purpose

Pruritus associated with intrathecal opioid administration is a common side effect. There is evidence that κ-opioid receptor agonists have antipruritic activity. Butorphanol has agonist actions at both κ-opioid and μ-opioid receptors. This study was designed to evaluate the antipruritic efficacy of butorphanol after intrathecal morphine administration in the setting of a randomized, double-blind study of parturients undergoing cesarean section.

Methods

Ninety-one women who received combined spinal–epidural anesthesia with 1.2?ml 0.5?% isobaric bupivacaine and 0.1?mg preservative-free morphine were included in this study. After delivery of the baby, the parturients were randomly allocated to two groups: butorphanol group (n?=?46) and physiological saline group (n?=?45). In the butorphanol group, parturients received an intravenous loading dose of 1?mg butorphanol followed by infusion of 0.2?mg/h butorphanol. The physiological saline group received an infusion of the same volume of physiological saline. The presence of pruritus, visual analog scores for pain, sedation scores, and adverse effects were recorded 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24?h after intrathecal morphine administration.

Results

The incidence of pruritus at 24?h was significantly more frequent in the physiological saline group than in the butorphanol group (48.9 vs. 13.0?%, P?<?0.001). The severity of pruritus was significantly greater in the saline group than in the butorphanol group 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10?h after intrathecal morphine injection (P?=?0.004, 0.001, 0.002, and 0.003, respectively). The visual analog scale scores at 24?h were significantly lower in the butorphanol group than in physiological saline group (P?<?0.001). The Ramsay sedation score in the butorphanol group was significantly higher than that in the physiological saline group after 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24?h (P?<?0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in nausea/vomiting and other adverse effects.

Conclusion

Administration of intravenous butorphanol after delivery of the baby can reduce pruritus that has been induced by intrathecal morphine administration in cesarean delivery with combined spinal–epidural anesthesia.     

Clonidine premedication in patients with sleep apnea syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Patients with sleep apnea often present with cardiac diseases and breathing difficulties, with a high risk of postoperative respiratory depression. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, prospective study in 30 adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea, undergoing elective ear-nose-throat surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or clonidine (2 microg/kg oral) the night before and the next morning 2 h before surgery. Spo2, heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, snoring, and oronasal airflow were monitored for 36 h. A standard anesthesia was used consisting of propofol and remifentanil. Anesthetic drug consumption, postoperative analgesics, and pain score were recorded. In the clonidine group, mean arterial blood pressures were significantly lower during induction, operation, and emergence from anesthesia. Both propofol dose required for induction (190 +/- 32.2 mg) and anesthesia (6.3 +/- 1.3 mg . kg(-1).h(-1)) during surgery were significantly reduced in the clonidine group compared with the placebo group (induction 218 +/- 32.4, anesthesia 7.70 +/- 1.5; P < 0.05). Piritramide consumption (7.4 +/- 5.1 versus 14.2 +/- 8.5 mg; P < 0.05) and analgesia scores were significantly reduced in the clonidine group. Apnea and desaturation index were not different between the groups, whereas the minimal postoperative oxygen saturation on the day of surgery was significantly lower in the placebo than in the clonidine group (76.7% +/- 8.0% versus 82.4% +/- 5.8%; P < 0.05). We conclude that oral clonidine premedication stabilizes hemodynamic variables during induction, maintenance, and emergence from anesthesia and reduces the amount of intraoperative anesthetics and postoperative opioids without deterioration of ventilation.     

Efficacy of oral immunotherapy on respiratory infections in hemodialysis patients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients suffer from several immune defects that make them prone to develop bacterial infections, in particular respiratory tract infections (RTIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: As previous studies have shown that oral immunotherapy with an immunomodulating bacterial extract (IBE) is effective against RTIs, we decided to test its efficacy and safety in HD patients during a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective study. 40 HD patients with a documented history of RTIs in the previous year were treated for 24 weeks of the endemic season with one capsule daily of IBE (n = 21) or placebo (PL, n = 19). Clinical examinations, measurements of Mac-1 and gp150.95 on circulating phagocytes and routine laboratory evaluations were performed at week 0, 4, 12 and 24. Patients were also examined at each dialysis session allowing an accurate recording of any infectious episode, its treatment and of any untoward effect. RESULTS: During the last period of the study (weeks 13-24), IBE significantly reduced the number of patients with RTIs and consequently of antibiotic treatment courses as compared to PL (p = 0.018), whereas no difference was detected between IBE and PL during periods I (weeks 0-4) and II (weeks 5-12). There was no difference between IBE and PL for other, non respiratory infections. IBE was associated at several time points with an increased expression on phagocytes of adhesion molecules involved in phagocytosis (Mac-1 and gp150.95). However, the expression of these molecules was not predictive for the occurrence of RTI. IBE was on the whole as well tolerated as PL, 7 patients presented side effects (5 IBE, 2 PL, NS) which led to drop-out in 4 cases (3 IBE, 1 PL). No serious side effect was recorded, gastrointestinal upset being the most prevalent type. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that immunomodulation with selected bacterial extracts constitutes a promising approach for the prevention of bacterial airway infections in groups at risk, such as HD patients.     

Salvage of sildenafil failures with cabergoline: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cabergoline in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who did not respond to sildenafil. Four hundred two sildenafil nonresponders aged from 21 to 59 years were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into group 1, those who received 0.5-1 mg cabergoline weekly for 6 months and group 2, who received placebo for the same period. They underwent preliminary assessment, including medical and sexual history, self-administered International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IVELT) evaluation. Standard biochemistry and hematological laboratory tests, and measurement of serum testosterone and prolactin levels were also carried out. When indicated, other tests were used to establish the diagnosis of vasculogenic and neurogenic ED, including penile color duplex Doppler ultrasonography, pudendal nerve conduction test and impaired sensory-evoked potentials studies. The efficacy of two treatments was assessed every 2 weeks during treatment, at the end of the study, using responses to IIEF, IVELT evaluation, mean intercourse satisfaction domain, mean weekly coitus episodes and adverse drug effects. The trial was completed by 370 (92%) men. Positive clinical results were seen in 31.2% of patients in the cabergoline group compared with 7.1% of patients in the placebo group (P=0.04). The mean weekly intercourse episodes increased from pretreatment values of 1.4 and 1.2 to 2.2 and 1.4, for cabergoline and placebo, respectively (P=0.04). Baseline mean intercourse satisfaction domain values of IIEF 10 and 11 reached to 15 and 10 at 6-month treatment in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P=0.04). The IVELT after cabergoline and placebo gradually increased from 98 and 101 s to approximately 242 and 116 s, respectively (P=0.001). More drug-related adverse effects occurred in cabergoline group and 12 (5.9%) had to discontinue treatment (P=0.001). Cabergoline is moderately effective salvage therapy for sildenafil nonresponse. Further studies with different dosages and treatment regimens are necessary to draw final conclusions on the efficacy of this drug in ED.     

加巴喷丁治疗血液透析患者顽固性尿毒症皮肤瘙痒的临床研究

目的 观察加巴喷丁（gabapentin）治疗顽固性尿毒症性皮肤瘙痒的有效性和安全性。 方法 采用随机对照研究,选择顽固性皮肤瘙痒的维持性血液透析（MHD）患者,随机分为试验组25例和对照组24例。试验组患者每周3次透析后晚间口服加巴喷丁100~300 mg;对照组每天口服氯雷他定10 mg。12周后根据视觉模拟评分、瘙痒VAG评分和改良Duo氏瘙痒评分进行疗效评价,同时观察不良反应。 结果 试验组患者经治疗后皮肤瘙痒症状明显改善,瘙痒分布范围减小,发作频率降低,睡眠明显改善,VAS评分（1.46±1.38比8.71±1.17,P < 0.01）、VAG评分（2.92±1.63比8.29±0.68,P < 0.01）和改良Duo氏瘙痒评分（11.33±3.99比30.75±4.87,P < 0.01）均较治疗前显著下降。对照组患者经治疗后瘙痒症状部分缓解,但疗效与试验组差异有统计学意义（P < 0.01）。服用加巴喷丁患者中,36%出现嗜睡、头晕,而症状均在1周内减轻或消失,没有患者因此中断治疗;未观察到严重不良反应。 结论 短期服用加巴喷丁能够安全和有效地治疗部分MHD患者的顽固性皮肤瘙痒。长期疗效及安全性仍需大样本和长期研究。     

Efficacy of trospium chloride in patients with detrusor instability: a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of trospium chloride (TCl, 20 mg twice daily) in the treatment of detrusor instability, compared with placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 208 patients were allocated at random to either TCl or placebo in a double-blind clinical study; the patients were treated for 3 weeks. Urodynamic values were measured at the beginning and end of the treatment period. Adverse events were recorded on patient diary cards. A confirmatory adaptive procedure with one planned interim analysis was used to evaluate efficacy. RESULTS: Trospium chloride produced significant improvements in maximum cystometric bladder capacity (median treatment effect 22.0 mL, mean 37.3 mL, one-sided P = 0. 0054) and urinary volume at first unstable contraction (median treatment effect 45.0 mL, mean 63.6 mL, one-sided P = 0.0015). The patients' assessment of efficacy showed significantly greater clinical improvement in the TCl group than in the placebo group (two-sided P = 0.0047). Furthermore, TCl was well tolerated, with similar frequencies of adverse events reported in both groups (68% in the TCl and 62% in the placebo group). CONCLUSION: Trospium chloride (20 mg twice daily) is an effective and safe option for the treatment of detrusor instability.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of enalapril in patients with clinical diabetic nephropathy.

It is unknown if the antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reflects attenuation in the rate of progression of diabetic nephropathy. We report the results of a randomized, double-blind clinical trial designed to evaluate the longitudinal (18-month) effect of the ACE inhibitor, enalapril (5 to 40 mg/d), versus a placebo on 24-hour urinary protein excretion and on the rate of progression of renal disease in 33 patients with clinical diabetic nephropathy. Systemic blood pressure was controlled throughout the trial with conventional antihypertensive drugs. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR), determined by Tc99mDTPA renal clearance, and urinary protein excretion were monitored at 3-month intervals. Enalapril, in contrast to placebo therapy, was associated with an initial (40%) and sustained (33%) decrease in urinary protein excretion. Patients randomized to both enalapril or placebo experienced mean decreases in GFR, from 1.01 mL/s/1.73 m2 (61 mL/min/1.73 m2) to 0.85 mL/s/1.73 m2 (51 mL/min/1.73 m2), and from 1.06 mL/s/1.73 m2 (64 mL/min/1.73 m2) to 0.97 mL/s/1.73 m2 (58 mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively. Eleven of 18 patients (61%) randomized to enalapril, and 10 of 15 (66%) patients randomized to placebo, had a decrease in GFR; their rates of progression were -1.18 mL/min/1.73 m2/mo and -1.00 mL/min/1.73 m2/mo, respectively. In the absence of changes in blood pressure, the addition of an ACE inhibitor to patients with clinical diabetic nephropathy could not be shown to confer a unique renal protective effect. A prolonged decrease in 24-hour protein excretion could not be shown to predict attenuation in the progression of established clinical diabetic nephropathy.     

Intra-operative paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in thoracotomy patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Objective: Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for post-thoracotomy pain relief but is contraindicated in certain patients. An alternative is paravertebral block. We investigated whether ropivacaine, administered through a paravertebral catheter placed by the surgeon, reduced postoperative pain. Methods: In a randomized double-blind study, adult patients with a paravertebral catheter placed by the thoracic surgeon after thoracotomy were randomly assigned to receive through this catheter, either a 0.1 ml kg⁻¹ bolus of 0.5% ropivacaine, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 ml kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ for 48 h, or saline at the same scheme of administration. Patients also benefited from patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous morphine (bolus 1 mg, lockout time 7 min), paracetamol, and nefopam. The primary endpoint was pain intensity on a visual analog scale at rest and on coughing. Secondary endpoints were total morphine consumption and side effects during the first 48 postoperative hours. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, and all the nurses and caring staff involved in this study were blinded. Solutions of saline and ropivacaine were prepared identically by the central pharmacy, without any possible identification of the product. Results: Forty-seven patients with contraindications to epidural anesthesia were included. There were no significant differences between the groups receiving ropivacaine and saline in terms of pain severity at rest and on coughing, mean postoperative morphine consumption (45.7 mg for ropivacaine, 43.2 mg in controls), and incidence of morphine-related side effects (nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, pruritus, respiratory rate, and sedation). Conclusions: Paravertebral block using a catheter placed by the thoracic surgeon was ineffective on postoperative pain after thoracotomy and did not confirm the analgesic effect that has been observed after percutaneous catheter placement. A direct comparison of these two placement methods is required.     

Cabergoline treatment in men with psychogenic erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

The effectiveness of cabergoline in 50 men with psychogenic erectile dysfunction was investigated in a 4-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study with validated psychological tests, and prolactin, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and testosterone serum levels. Cabergoline treatment was well-tolerated and resulted in normalization of hormone levels in most cases. In the cabergoline-treated group, significant interactions between prolactin and testosterone serum concentrations were observed. Erectile function improved significantly. Sexual desire, orgasmic function, and the patient's and his partner's sexual satisfaction were also enhanced. Cabergoline may be an effective and safe alternative agent for men with psychogenic ED.