共查询到17条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
2.
2019年12月以来,湖北省武汉市新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19,简称新冠肺炎)疫情爆发,并快速向全国各地及境外蔓延,严重威胁人民生命健康。口腔诊疗因具有医护患距离近、操作时间长,并且常规使用高速涡轮快速手机、超声波洁牙机等产生大量飞沫和气溶胶设备的特点,存在较高的院内扩散和医院感染风险。为有效地阻断医院内新型冠状病毒的传播,控制疫情的扩散,结合口腔诊疗特点,本文提出了新冠肺炎疫情期间口腔门诊管理及防控对策,并希望对后疫情期即将恢复正常诊疗活动的医院感染防控提供参考。 相似文献
3.
4.
新型冠状病毒肺炎爆发对口腔医疗机构管理和临床诊疗中的传染病防护提出了新课题。本文结合我国传染病防治法、国家卫生健康委员会颁发的相关规范标准,参考部分省份口腔医疗质量控制中心制定的口腔门、急诊医院感染控制规范和本次新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情情况,对口腔门、急诊在疫情控制期控制交叉感染和医务人员防护等方面进行了探讨,希望为疫情发生时口腔医疗机构的应对和相关的临床研究提供参考。 相似文献
5.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(Corona Virus Disease 2019,COVID-19)的爆发和传播,成为被世界卫生组织认定的“国际关注的突发公共卫生事件”[1],对口腔种植门诊的诊疗和护理带来巨大的挑战。口腔种植门诊诊疗操作的特殊性,新型冠状病毒肺炎的流行病学特点,使口腔医务人员成为新型冠状病毒肺炎感染的高危群体,疫情存在口腔操作中爆发的危险。本文根据对新型冠状病毒防控的总体要求,结合口腔种植门诊的专业特点,制定相关护理防控措施,保证护理工作有序进行,提高诊疗工作的安全性。本文内容涉及预检分诊、不同工作场景下的防护及提高口腔种植门诊诊疗环境安全性等,提出了疫情下的口腔护理防护策略,达到保护医护人员和患者健康的目的,以期为口腔种植门诊在疫情期的护理防控工作提供参考。 相似文献
6.
7.
本文根据国家有关新型冠状病毒感染防控要求和突发公共卫生事件应急条例,以及口腔专科的临床诊疗特点,参考国内外口腔诊疗中感染防控相关指南和文献,结合医院疫情期口腔诊疗中感染防控的应急管理工作举措,提出应对此次新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期医院感染防控的建议,重点聚焦疫情期医务人员防护培训及医院感染防控落实等方面,旨在为口腔专科在疫情发生期快速应对新型冠状病毒感染防控的应急管理提供参考。 相似文献
8.
新型冠状病毒肺炎的爆发对口腔颌面外科的诊疗和护理带来了巨大的挑战。为有效防止新型冠状病毒肺炎所致的疫情蔓延,最大限度减少新型冠状病毒肺炎在医疗机构内传播的风险,本文结合国家对新型冠状病毒防控的总体要求和颌面外科专业特点,制定口腔颌面外科护理管理相关防控措施,内容涉及预检分诊、分级防护、健康教育、相关科室防控关键点以及护理操作中的防控策略等,以保证颌面外科护理工作有序进行,同时提出了新型冠状病毒肺炎感染防控期间的口腔颌面外科护理管理建议,期望对疫情期口腔颌面外科的护理管理及今后的研究提供参考。 相似文献
11.
12.
2020年1月20日,国家卫生健康委员会公告(2020年第1号)将新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎纳入《中华人民共和国传染病防治法》规定的乙类传染病,按甲类传染病管理。各级人民政府、卫生健康行政部门高度重视,医疗卫生机构依法采取系列防控措施,共同预防控制新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情的传播。在抗击疫情工作中,如何做好口腔黏膜病科医师防护规范、手部和环境的清洁消毒,对于口腔黏膜病伴发热的患者如何合理开展预检分诊,疫情防控期间口腔黏膜病患者的自我保健和自我管理等,是各级医疗机构、医务工作者和口腔黏膜病患者遇到的实际问题。针对这3个与口腔黏膜病科相关的问题,上海市口腔医学会口腔黏膜病专业委员会和上海第九人民医院集团口腔黏膜病专科联盟组织专家编写了相应的处置流程及专家建议,以满足当前口腔黏膜病医务工作者和患者更好地应对新型冠状病毒感染疫情工作的需要。本建议将根据国内疫情防控形势及新的相关诊疗方案而及时更新。 相似文献
13.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情在短期内已扩散至全球30个国家和地区,被世界卫生组织认定为“突发公共卫生事件”。正确的防控措施可以阻断新型冠状病毒在医院内的传播,降低感染发生风险,有效防止疫情的进一步扩散。口腔颅颌面科承担着颌面部创伤急诊的工作,因诊疗操作的特殊性,交叉感染的风险较高,严格的防控措施尤其重要。本文从新型冠状病毒的流行病学特点、患者评估以及门急诊诊疗操作规范、围术期全方位防护管理等方面进行讨论,并提出相应建议。 相似文献
14.
Nora S. Al-Nomay Abdulghani Ashi Aljohara Al-Hargan Abdulaziz Alshalhoub Emad Masuadi 《Saudi Dental Journal》2017,29(2):59-65
Aim
To collect empirical data on the attitudes of dental professionals and dental auxiliaries in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, regarding the disclosure of medical errors.Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving the administration of a questionnaire to a sample of 586 participants recruited from over 10 government and private dental institutions in Riyadh between August 2015 and January 2016. The questionnaire collected information regarding participant opinions on (a) personal beliefs, norms, and practices regarding medical errors, (b) the nature of errors that should be disclosed, and (c) who should disclose errors.Results
Most (94.4%) participants preferred that medical errors should be disclosed. However, personal preferences, perceptions of the norm and current practices with respect to which type (seriousness) of error should be disclosed were inconsistent. Only 17.9% of participants perceived that it was the current practice to disclose errors resulting in “Major harm”. Over 68% of respondents reported a personal belief, a perception of the norm and a perception of current practice that errors should be disclosed by the erring dentist. Participants at government institutions were more likely to disclose errors than those at private institutions. There were also significant differences in the responses with respect to gender, age, and nationality. The implications for the development of guidelines to help Saudi dentists adopt ethical courses of action for the disclosure of errors are considered.Conclusions
(1) The majority of participants personally believed that errors should be disclosed, (2) there was little agreement between participant personal beliefs and perceptions of the norm and practice with respect to which type of errors should be disclosed, (3) there was strong agreement that the erring dentist is responsible for reporting errors, and (4) the attitudes of the participants varied with respect to type of institution, age, gender, and nationality. 相似文献15.
《Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery》2022,50(5):462-467
Among healthcare workers, oral and maxillofacial surgeons are some of the most exposed to coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The aim of this retrospective study was to develop suggestions for continuing the work of oral and maxillofacial surgeons using a safe protocol for elective and urgent aerosol-generating procedures that could prevent the onset of new clusters.Based on the results obtained and a guidelines review of those Asian countries that had promptly managed the current pandemic, the following safety protocol was developed: 相似文献
16.
Peter B. Lockhart Malavika P. Tampi Elliot Abt Anita Aminoshariae Michael J. Durkin Ashraf F. Fouad Prerna Gopal Benjamin W. Hatten Erinne Kennedy Melanie S. Lang Lauren L. Patton Thomas Paumier Katie J. Suda Lauren Pilcher Olivia Urquhart Kelly K. O’Brien Alonso Carrasco-Labra 《Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)》2019,150(11):906-921.e12
BackgroundAn expert panel convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs and the Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated clinical recommendations for the urgent management of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with or without symptomatic apical periodontitis, pulp necrosis and symptomatic apical periodontitis, or pulp necrosis and localized acute apical abscess using antibiotics, either alone or as adjuncts to definitive, conservative dental treatment (DCDT) in immunocompetent adults.Types of Studies ReviewedThe authors conducted a search of the literature in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature to retrieve evidence on benefits and harms associated with antibiotic use. The authors used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to assess the certainty in the evidence and the Evidence-to-Decision framework.ResultsThe panel formulated 5 clinical recommendations and 2 good practice statements, each specific to the target conditions, for settings in which DCDT is and is not immediately available. With likely negligible benefits and potentially large harms, the panel recommended against using antibiotics in most clinical scenarios, irrespective of DCDT availability. They recommended antibiotics in patients with systemic involvement (for example, malaise or fever) due to the dental conditions or when the risk of experiencing progression to systemic involvement is high.Conclusion and Practical ImplicationsEvidence suggests that antibiotics for the target conditions may provide negligible benefits and probably contribute to large harms. The expert panel suggests that antibiotics for target conditions be used only when systemic involvement is present and that immediate DCDT should be prioritized in all cases. 相似文献