Role of hypothermia in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion

Two experiments examined the effect of ambient temperature during ethanol exposure on development of conditioned taste aversion to saccharin. In both studies, male albino rats receiving saccharin-ethanol (1.5 g/kg, IP) pairings followed by 6-h exposure to a 32° C environment developed a weaker saccharin aversion than did rats experiencing ethanol at room temperature. Exposure to the warm environment reduced ethanol-induced hypothermia, but enhanced ethanol's motor-impairing effect. The influence of ambient temperature on ethanol-induced taste aversion may be due to changes in body temperature, neural sensitivity, or elimination rate. Although alternative accounts cannot be entirely dismissed, this outcome suggests that ethanol-induced hypothermia plays a role in determining strength of conditioned taste aversion and thus may be involved in the regulation of oral ethanol intake in rats. Offprint requests to: C.L. Cunningham     

Localization of genes influencing ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and locomotor activity in BXD recombinant inbred mice

Genetic differences in ethanol's ability to induce conditioned place preference were studied in 20 BXD Recombinant Inbred (RI) mouse strains and in the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J progenitor strains. Male mice from each strain were exposed to a Pavlovian conditioning procedure in which a distinctive floor stimulus (CS+) was paired four times with ethanol (2 g/kg). A different floor stimulus (CS-) was paired with saline. Control mice were injected only with saline. Floor preference testing without ethanol revealed significant genetic differences in conditioned place preference, with some strains spending nearly 80% time on the ethanolpaired floor while others spent only 50% (i.e., no preference). Control mice showed genetic differences in unconditioned preference for the floor cues, but unconditioned preference was not genetically correlated with conditioned preference. There were also substantial genetic differences in ethanol-stimulated activity, but contrary to psychomotor stimulant theory, ethanol-induced activity on conditioning trials was not positively correlated with strength of conditioned place preference. However, there was a significant negative genetic correlation (r=–0.42) between test session activity and preference. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses showed strong associations (P<0.01) between conditioned place preference and marker loci on chromosomes 4, 8, 9, 18 and 19. Weaker associations (0.01<P<0.05) were identified on several other chromosomes. Analysis also yielded several significant QTL for unconditioned preference, ethanol-stimulated activity, and sensitization. Overall, these data support the conclusion that genotype influences ethanol-induced conditioned place preference, presumably via genetic differences in sensitivity to ethanol's rewarding effects. Moreover, several chromosomal regions containing candidate genes of potential relevance to ethanol-induced conditioned place preference have been identified.     

Caffeine promotes an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion: a dose-dependent interaction

The present study examined whether caffeine administered within a dose range previously shown to promote ethanol drinking would also alter an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The results revealed a dose-dependent interaction between caffeine and ethanol where caffeine (2.5 and 10 mg/kg) promoted an ethanol-induced CTA at a low ethanol dose (1.0 g/kg) but had no effect in blocking CTA at the higher ethanol dose (1.5 g/kg). These results were found to be unrelated to an alteration in ethanol metabolism, as caffeine had no effect in altering blood ethanol levels at the doses tested. In agreement with the reward comparison hypothesis, the present results suggest that rather than attenuate ethanol's "aversive" effects, caffeine may have promoted an ethanol-induced CTA by increasing the reinforcing efficacy of ethanol.     

Genetic differences in naloxone enhancement of ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion

The influence of the opioid system on acquisition of an ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion was examined in alcohol-preferring and avoiding inbred strains of mice (C57BL/6J and DBA/2J). Fluid-deprived mice from each strain received either ethanol alone, naloxone alone, or both ethanol and naloxone immediately after access to a novel tasting fluid. Naloxone alone (1 or 3 mg/kg) did not induce a conditioned taste aversion in either strain of mice. Administration of ethanol (1.5 g/kg) to DBA/2J mice produced a moderate taste aversion that was not affected by co-administration of naloxone. Although ethanol administered alone (3 g/kg) did not cause a taste aversion in C57BL/6J mice, the combination of ethanol and the higher dose of naloxone produced a significant taste aversion that increased across trials. A second experiment addressed the possibility that naloxone failed to enhance the ethanol-induced condition taste aversion in DBA/2J mice due to a floor effect on consumption. A lower ethanol dose (1 g/kg) was given alone or in combination with naloxone (1 or 3 mg/kg). Again, ethanol produced a moderate conditioned taste aversion that was not potentiated by naloxone. Subsequent conditioning with a high ethanol dose produced further suppression of intake, confirming that naloxone's failure to enhance aversion on earlier trials was not due to a floor effect. These data demonstrate a strain specific interaction between the aversive effect of ethanol and naloxone. More specifically, the results indicate that blockade of opioid receptors enhances the aversive effect of ethanol in C57BL/6J but not DBA/2J mice, suggesting that genetically determined differences in the endogenous opioid system of alcohol-preferring mice may mitigate ethanol's aversive effect.     

Distal and proximal pre-exposure to ethanol in the place conditioning task: tolerance to aversive effect,sensitization to activating effect,but no change in rewarding effect

RATIONALE: The literature offers many examples of tolerance to ethanol's inhibitory/depressant effects and sensitization to its activating effects. There are also many examples of tolerance to ethanol's aversive effects as measured in the conditioned taste aversion and conditioned place aversion (CPA) procedures. However, there are very few demonstrations of either tolerance or sensitization to ethanol's rewarding or reinforcing effects. OBJECTIVE: The present studies were designed to examine effects of two forms of ethanol pre-exposure (distal or proximal) on ethanol's rewarding and aversive effects as indexed by the place conditioning procedure. METHOD: Male inbred (DBA/2J) mice were exposed to ethanol (2 g/kg IP) in an unbiased place conditioning procedure that normally produces either conditioned place preference (CPP) (ethanol injection before CS exposure) or CPA (ethanol injection after CS exposure). In the distal pre-exposure studies (experiments 1 and 2), mice initially received a series of four ethanol injections (0, 2, or 4 g/kg) in the home cage at 48-h intervals during the week before place conditioning. In the proximal pre-exposure studies (experiments 3-4), mice were injected with ethanol 65 min before (experimental groups) or 65 min after (control groups) each paired ethanol injection on CS+ trials. RESULTS: Distal pre-exposure produced a robust sensitization to ethanol's activating effect, whereas proximal pre-exposure generally reduced the activation normally produced by the paired ethanol injection. Both forms of pre-exposure interfered with CPA, but had no effect on CPP. CONCLUSIONS: These studies suggest that both forms of pre-exposure reduced ethanol's aversive effect, but had no impact on ethanol's rewarding effect. In general, the detrimental effects of pre-exposure on CPA are explained best in terms of a reduction in ethanol's efficacy as an aversive unconditioned stimulus (i.e. tolerance), although explanations based on other types of associative interference are also possible. The failure to affect CPP with pre-exposure treatments that reduced or eliminated CPA suggests that these behaviors are mediated by independent, motivationally opposite effects of ethanol. Moreover, these results indicate dissociation between sensitization to ethanol's locomotor activating effect and changes in its rewarding effect. To the extent that motivational processes measured by CPP and CPA normally contribute to ethanol drinking, the present findings suggest that increases in ethanol intake seen after chronic ethanol exposure are more likely caused by tolerance to ethanol's aversive effect rather than sensitization to its rewarding or reinforcing effect.     

Haloperidol reduces ethanol-induced motor activity stimulation but not conditioned place preference

This experiment examined the impact of a dopamine receptor blocker on ethanol's rewarding effect in a place conditioning paradigm. DBA/2J mice received four pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (2 g/kg, IP), haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg, IP) + ethanol, or haloperidol alone. A different stimulus was paired with saline. Ethanol produced increases in locomotor activity that were reduced by haloperidol. However, conditioned preference for the ethanol-paired stimulus was not affected by haloperidol. Haloperidol alone decreased locomotor activity during conditioning and produced a place aversion. These results indicate a dissociation of ethanol's activating and rewarding effects. Moreover, they suggest that ethanol's ability to induce conditioned place preference is mediated by nondopaminergic mechanisms.     

Motivational properties of ethanol in mice selectively bred for ethanol-induced locomotor differences

Ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation has been proposed to be positively correlated with the rewarding effects of ethanol (Wise and Bozarth 1987). The present experiments provided a test of this hypothesis using a genetic model. Three behavioral indices of the motivational effects of ethanol (drinking, taste conditioning, place conditioning) were examined in mice from two independent FAST lines, selectively bred for sensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, and mice from two independent SLOW lines, selectively bred for insensitivity to ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. In a single-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to drinking tubes containing ethanol in a concentration (1–12% v/v) that increased over 24 consecutive days. FAST mice consumed greater amounts of ethanol solution. In a two-bottle procedure, mice were allowed access to tubes containing water or various concentrations of ethanol (2–8% v/v) over 6 days. FAST mice generally showed greater preference for ethanol solutions than SLOW mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, mice received access to saccharin solution followed by injection of 2.5 g/kg ethanol (IP). SLOW mice developed aversion to the saccharin flavor more readily than FAST mice. In a series of place conditioning experiments, tactile stimuli were paired with various doses of ethanol (0.8–2.0 g/kg). During conditioning, FAST mice showed locomotor stimulation after 1.0, 1.2 and 2.0 g/kg ethanol while SLOW mice did not. During testing, mice conditioned with 1.2 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg ethanol showed conditioned place preference, but there were no line differences in magnitude of preference. These results indicate that genetic selection for sensitivity to ethanol-stimulated activity has resulted in genetic differences in ethanol drinking and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion but not ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Overall, these data provide mixed support for the psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction.     

Role of catalase in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion: a study with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole

Recent studies involved acetaldehyde, the first ethanol metabolite, in both the rewarding and aversive effects of ethanol consumption. Brain acetaldehyde is believed to originate mainly from local brain metabolism of ethanol by the enzyme catalase. Therefore, the inhibition of catalase by 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (aminotriazole) may help to clarify the involvement of acetaldehyde in ethanol's hedonic effects. In the present study, multiple doses of both ethanol and aminotriazole were used to investigate the effects of catalase inhibition on ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). A separate microdialysis experiment investigated the effects of aminotriazole pretreatment on the time course of brain ethanol concentrations. Ethanol induced a dose-dependent CTA with a maximal effect after conditioning with 2.0 g/kg ethanol. Aminotriazole pretreatments dose-dependently potentiated the CTA induced by 1.0 g/kg ethanol. However, aminotriazole pretreatments did not alter the CTA induced by higher ethanol doses (1.5 and 2.0 g/kg) probably because a maximal aversion for saccharin was already obtained without aminotriazole. The results of the microdialysis experiment confirmed that the effects of aminotriazole cannot be attributed to local alterations of brain ethanol levels. The present study argues against a role for brain acetaldehyde in ethanol's aversive effects but in favor of its involvement in ethanol rewarding properties.     

Non-specific enhancement of ethanol-induced taste aversion by naloxone

The conditioned taste aversion paradigm (CTA) was used to examine the effects of naloxone on ethanol-induced aversion towards a saccharine solution (3 conditioning and 11 extinction trials). Six groups of rats received conditioning trials consisting of two IP injections after saccharine presentation of different combinations of either ethanol (E: 1.75 g/kg), LiCl (L: 12 mEq/kg, 0.1 M), naloxone (N: 10 mg/kg) or saline (S); S-S, S-N, E-S, E-N, L-S and L-N. Naloxone by itself produced no aversion to the saccharin flavor. Based on the onset and extinction of aversion, naloxone significantly enhanced ethanol but also LiCl-induced CTA. The comparative data argues in favor of different mechanisms of action (1) between the aversive central effects of ethanol and morphine and (2) between ethanol's acute behavioral effects and negatively reinforcing properties. Enhancement of ethanol and LiCl-induced CTA by naloxone is compatible with hypernociceptive action of the opiate-antagonist and with the pain-modulating role of opiates in the CNS.     

Different roles of mu-, delta- and kappa-opioid receptors in ethanol-associated place preference in rats exposed to conditioned fear stress

The present study was designed to investigate the role of the endogenous opioid system in the development of ethanol-induced place preference in rats exposed to conditioned fear stress (exposure to an environment paired previously with electric foot shock), using the conditioned place preference paradigm. The administration of ethanol (300 mg/kg, i.p.) with conditioned fear stress induced significant place preference. Naloxone (1 and 3 mg/kg, s.c.), a non-selective opioid receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated this ethanol-induced place preference. Moreover, the selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (3 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) and the selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole (1 and 3 mg/kg, s.c.) significantly attenuated ethanol-induced place preference. In contrast, the selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly enhanced ethanol-induced place preference. Furthermore, 75 mg/kg ethanol (which tended to produce place preference) combined with the mu-opioid receptor agonist morphine (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) or the selective delta-opioid receptor agonist 2-methyl-4aalpha-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12aalpha- octahydroquinolino [2,3,3,-g] isoquinoline (TAN-67; 20 mg/kg, s.c.), at doses which alone did not produce place preference, produced significant place preference. However, co-administration of the selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist trans-3,4-dichloro-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl)benzenacetamide methanesulfonate (U50,488H; 0.3 and 1 mg/kg, s.c.) with ethanol (300 mg/kg, i.p.) dose dependently attenuated ethanol-induced place preference. Moreover, conditioned fear stress shifted the response curve for the aversive effect of U50,488H to the left. These results suggest that mu- and delta-opioid receptors may play critical roles in the rewarding mechanism of ethanol, and that kappa-opioid receptors may modulate the development of the rewarding effect of ethanol under psychological stress.     

Acquisition, expression, and reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice: effects of exposure to stress and modulation by mecamylamine

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors mediate some of the rewarding and motivational effects of ethanol, including relapses. Relapses are common in drug addicts during abstinence when exposure to any stressor ensues. However, the role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the ethanol- and stress-induced reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference has not yet been explored. Therefore, the present study investigated the influence of mecamylamine, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptors antagonist on acquisition, expression, and reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in adult male Swiss mice. The results revealed that mecamylamine (0.1-10 μg/mouse, intracerebroventricularly) dose dependently prevented the development, expression, and reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. Further, acute treatment with mecamylamine blocked the restraint stress and forced swim stress-induced reinstatement of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference. All of these treatments had no influence on the locomotor activity. Therefore, it is concluded that mecamylamine blocks the acquisition, expression and reinstatement of conditioned reinforcing effects of ethanol without per se reinforcing or aversive influence. This ability of mecamylamine might be a potential advantage in the treatment of alcoholism.     

Extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and conditioned place aversion: effects of naloxone

 Four experiments examined the effect of naloxone pretreatment on the expression and extinction of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (experiments 1, 2, 4) or conditioned place aversion (experiments 1, 3). DBA/2 J mice received four pairings of a distinctive tactile (floor) stimulus (CS) with injection of ethanol (2 g/kg) given either immediately before or after 5-min exposure to the CS. A different stimulus was paired with injection of saline. Pre-CS injection of ethanol produced conditioned place preference, whereas post-CS injection of ethanol produced conditioned place aversion. Both behaviors extinguished partially during repeated choice testing after vehicle injection. Naloxone (10 mg/kg) had little effect on the initial expression of conditioned place preference, but facilitated its extinction. Moreover, repeated naloxone testing resulted in the expression of a weak conditioned place aversion to the CS that initially elicited a place preference. In contrast, naloxone (1.5 or 10 mg/kg) enhanced expression of conditioned place aversion, thereby increasing its resistance to extinction. A control experiment (experiment 4) indicated that repeated testing with a different aversive drug, lithium chloride, did not affect rate of extinction or produce an aversion to the CS previously paired with ethanol. These findings do not support the suggestion that naloxone facilitates the general processes that underlie extinction of associative learning. Also, these data are not readily explained by the conditioning of place aversion at the time of testing. Rather, naloxone’s effects appear to reflect a selective influence on maintenance of ethanol’s conditioned rewarding effect, an effect that may be mediated by release of endogenous opioids. Overall, these findings encourage further consideration of the use of opiate antagonists in the treatment of alcoholism. Received: 4 December 1997 / Final version: 16 February 1998     

Proximal ethanol pretreatment interferes with acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference

Neurobiological mechanisms underlying rewarding and aversive effects of drugs are often studied by examining effects of various pretreatments on acquisition of conditioned place preference (CPP) or conditioned place aversion (CPA). However, few studies have looked at effects of pretreatment with the same drug used during conditioning. Such studies might offer insight into agonist actions on conditioning while also mimicking real world contingencies experienced by drug users. Previous work from our laboratory, which showed that same drug pre-exposure interfered with acquisition of ethanol CPA but not CPP, was limited by the use of only one pre-treatment time interval (65 min). Thus, the present studies were designed to study other intervals (-5, -15, -30). Pretreatment of DBA/2J mice with ethanol (2 g/kg) reduced the activity response normally evoked by the conditioning dose (2 g/kg) at all pretreatment times, but acquisition of CPP was disrupted only by pretreatment at -5 min. The overall pattern of findings suggests that ethanol's early pharmacological effects interfered with learning the association between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and ethanol 5 min later. Thus, one would expect ethanol agonists, when administered in close proximity to CS-ethanol pairings, to interfere with control of ethanol seeking by that CS.     

An acetaldehyde-sequestering agent inhibits appetitive reinforcement and behavioral stimulation induced by ethanol in preweanling rats

Ethanol's motivational consequences have been related to the actions of acetaldehyde, a metabolic product of ethanol oxidation. The present study assessed the role of acetaldehyde in the motivational effects of ethanol on preweanling rats. In Experiment 1 pups (postnatal days 13-14, PD 13-14) were given systemic administration of d-penicillamine (DP, a drug that sequesters acetaldehyde: 0, 25, 50 or 75 mg/kg) before pairings of 1.0 g/kg ethanol and a rough surface (sandpaper, conditioned stimulus, CS). At test, pups given sandpaper-ethanol pairings exhibited greater preference for the CS than unpaired controls, but this preference was not expressed by pups given DP. Pre-training administration of 25 or 50 mg/kg DP completely blocked the expression of ethanol-mediated appetitive conditioning. d-penicillamine did not alter blood ethanol levels. Subsequent experiments revealed that ethanol-induced activation was blocked by central (intra-cisterna magna injections, volume: 1 μl, dose: 0 or 75 μg) but not systemic treatment with DP (0, 25, 50 or 75 mg/kg; ip). These results indicate that: (a) preweanling rats are sensitive to the reinforcing effect of ethanol, and (b) that this effect is associated with the motor activating effect of the drug. These effects seem to be mediated by the first metabolite of ethanol, acetaldehyde.     

Baclofen alters ethanol-stimulated activity but not conditioned place preference or taste aversion in mice.

The present experiments examined the effects of the GABA(B) receptor agonist, baclofen, on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) and conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in male DBA/2J mice. Mice in the CPP experiment received four pairings of ethanol (2g/kg) with a distinctive floor stimulus for a 5-min conditioning session (CS+ sessions). On intervening days (CS- sessions), mice received saline injections paired with a different floor type. On CS+ days, mice also received one of four doses of baclofen (0.0. 2.5, 5.0, or 7.5 mg/kg) 15 min before an injection of ethanol. For the preference test, all mice received saline injections, and were placed on a half-grid and half-hole floor for a 60-min session. Baclofen dose dependently reduced ethanol-stimulated activity, but did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CPP at any dose. For the CTA experiment, mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water restriction regimen followed by five conditioning trials every 48 h. During conditioning trials, subjects received an injection of saline or baclofen (2.0 and 6.0 mg/kg) 15 min before injection of 2 g/kg ethanol or saline following 1-h access to a saccharin solution. Baclofen did not alter the magnitude of ethanol-induced CTA at any dose. In addition, baclofen alone did not produce a CTA. Overall, these studies show that activation of GABA(B) receptors with baclofen reduces ethanol-induced locomotor activation, but does not alter ethanol's rewarding or aversive effects in the CPP and CTA paradigms in DBA/2J mice.     

Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice

Rationale

Studies support differential roles of dopamine receptor subfamilies in the rewarding and reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse, including ethanol. However, the roles these receptor subfamilies play in ethanol reward are not fully delineated.

Objective

To examine the roles of dopamine receptor subfamilies in the acquisition of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), we pretreated animals systemically with antagonist drugs selective for dopamine D1-like (SCH-23390) and D2-like (raclopride) receptors prior to ethanol conditioning trials.

Methods

Effects of raclopride (0–1.2 mg/kg) and SCH-23390 (0–0.3 mg/kg) on the acquisition of ethanol-induced CPP were examined in DBA/2J mice (experiments 1 and 2). Based on significant effects of SCH-23390, we then determined if SCH-23390 (0.3 mg/kg) produced a place preference on its own (experiment 3). To evaluate whether SCH-23390 impaired learning, we used a conditioned place aversion (CPA) paradigm and pretreated animals with SCH-23390 (0–0.3 mg/kg) before conditioning sessions with LiCl (experiment 4).

Results

Whereas raclopride (0–1.2 mg/kg) did not affect acquisition, SCH-23390 (0.1–0.3 mg/kg) impaired the development of ethanol-induced CPP. SCH-23390 (0.3 mg/kg) did not produce place preference when tested alone and SCH-23390 (0.1–0.3 mg/kg) did not perturb the acquisition of LiCl-induced CPA.

Conclusions

Our results support a role for dopamine D1-like but not D2-like receptors in ethanol’s unconditioned rewarding effect as indexed by CPP. Blockade of D1-like receptors did not affect aversive learning in this procedure.     

Moderate doses of ethanol partially reverse avoidance learning deficits in high-alcohol-drinking rats

We previously reported that ethanol-naive high-alcohol-drinking (HAD1 and HAD2) rats exhibited selective deficits in active avoidance learning, as compared to low-alcohol-drinking (LAD1 and LAD2) rats, in a signaled bar-pressing task [Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 24 (2000) 1778]. In the current study, we used appetitive and aversive learning tasks to assess whether administration of ethanol influences approach and avoidance learning in HAD and LAD rats. Rats were administered 0.0, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 g ethanol/kg body weight during appetitive and aversive conditioning sessions. We found that ethanol impaired acquisition of the appetitive conditioned response in a dose-dependent manner in both HAD and LAD rats, with 1.5 g/kg ethanol producing the greatest deficits. Notably, moderate doses of ethanol (0.5 and 1.0 g/kg) partially reversed avoidance learning deficits in HAD rats, but only when appetitive conditioning preceded aversive conditioning. The highest dose (1.5 g/kg EtOH) abolished avoidance responding altogether in HAD rats. Avoidance responding in LAD rats was not affected by any dose of ethanol. These results are consistent with previous studies suggesting that alcohol preference may be associated with increased fear or anxiety, but the conditions under which ethanol produces a reduction of fear and anxiety in HAD rats appear to be relatively complex.     

Acquisition and expression of ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in mice is inhibited by naloxone

The effects of opioid antagonists on conditioned reward produced by ethanol provide variable and sometimes conflicting results, especially in mice. In the present set of experiments, male C57BL/6 mice received 4 vehicle and 4 ethanol conditionings, and the rewarding effects of ethanol were assessed in an unbiased version of the conditioned place preference (CPP) apparatus and an unbiased stimulus assignment procedure. Intraperitoneal (ip) administration of ethanol (2 g/kg, but not 1 g/kg) resulted in the conditioned reward when conditionings lasted for 6 min but not when conditioning lasted for 20 min. Administration of the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (1 and 5 mg/kg) before the conditionings attenuated the acquisition of ethanol-induced place preference. Naloxone (1 mg/kg) also inhibited expression of the CPP response, but it did not alter the preference of vehicle-conditioned mice, suggesting the lack of its own motivational effects in this experimental setting. Taken together, the present results suggest that an unbiased version of ethanol-induced CPP in C57BL/6 mice could be a valid model for the study of the motivational effects of ethanol, confirming and expanding previous findings that have demonstrated inhibitory effects of opioid receptor antagonist on alcohol conditioned reward.     

Effects of maternal separation on voluntary ethanol intake and brain peptide systems in female Wistar rats

In previous studies, changes in adult ethanol intake after early environmental experiences, such as short and prolonged maternal separation, have been described in male rats. The aim of this study was to further investigate long-term effects of maternal separation on voluntary ethanol intake as well as brain opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptides in female Wistar rats. During postnatal days (PNDs) 1-21, rat pups were subjected to 15 min (MS15) or 360 min (MS360) of daily maternal separation, or were kept under normal animal facility rearing (AFR) conditions. At 10 weeks of age, ethanol intake was measured using a two-bottle free choice paradigm and dynorphin B (DYNB), Met-enkephalin-Arg6-Phe7 (MEAP) and N/OFQ levels were analyzed. MS15 resulted in changes in hypothalamus (DYNB), medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens (MEAP), and amygdala (N/OFQ). MS360 induced alterations in medial prefrontal cortex (MEAP) and amygdala (N/OFQ). MS15 and MS360 had no effect on ethanol intake. However, 4 weeks of ethanol intake affected peptide levels differently in MS15, MS360 and AFR rats and resulted in attenuation of the separation-induced differences. These results show that even though maternal separation has no effect on voluntary ethanol intake in female rats, the ethanol-induced effects on peptide levels depend on the early environmental setting.     

Ontogeny of ethanol-induced motor impairment following acute ethanol: Assessment via the negative geotaxis reflex in adolescent and adult rats

Adolescent rats have been observed to be less sensitive than adults to a number of ethanol effects that may serve as feedback cues to reduce further ethanol intake. Among these findings are a few reports of attenuated sensitivities of adolescents to ethanol-induced motor impairment. The purpose of the present study was to further explore potential age-related differences in ethanol-induced motor impairment in both male and female adolescent (postnatal day [P]28-32), and adult (P68-72) Sprague-Dawley rats using an inclined plane assessment of the negative geotaxis reflex. Adult males displayed significant motor impairment at 1.5 g/kg, whereas adolescent males required higher doses, showing significant motor impairment only at doses of 2.25 g/kg ethanol or greater. Intoxicated practice did not significantly influence level of motor impairment at either age. When female rats of both ages were separately analyzed in terms of their response to ethanol, a dose of 1.5 g/kg ethanol was found to significantly impair adults, whereas adolescent females showed significant motor impairment when challenged with 2.25 g/kg but not 1.5 g/kg ethanol. Yet when the 1.5 g/kg data of females at the two ages were directly compared, no significant age difference was seen at this dose. These data document an attenuated sensitivity of adolescent relative to adult rats to the motor impairing effects of ethanol using a stationary inclined plane test, an effect particularly robust in male animals, and demonstrates the utility of this test for assessment of motor coordination in adolescent and adult rats.