Phase III trial of induction gemcitabine or paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by paclitaxel consolidation in ovarian cancer

Objective

The safety and efficacy of gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GC) or paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) induction regimens with or without paclitaxel consolidation therapy were assessed in ovarian cancer (OC).

Methods

Patients with stage IC-IV OC were randomized to either GC (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m², days 1 and 8, plus carboplatin area under the curve [AUC] 5, day 1) or TC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m² plus carboplatin AUC 6, day 1) every 21 days for up to six cycles. Patients with complete response (CR) were allowed optional consolidation with paclitaxel 135 mg/m² every 28 days for ≤ 12 months. Patients without CR received single-agent crossover therapy at induction doses/schedules until CR, disease progression (PD), or unacceptable toxicity. PD or death in 636 patients was required to compare induction arms with 80% statistical power for progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint.

Results

Randomized induction therapy was received by 820 of 919 patients enrolled; 352 patients with CR received paclitaxel consolidation whereas 155 patients without CR received single-agent crossover therapy. PFS was similar for GC and TC (median, 20.0 and 22.2 months, respectively; P = .199). Despite high censoring rates (> 52%), overall survival was longer for TC (median, 57.3 versus 43.8 months for GC; P = .013). Controlling for patient characteristics including performance status, residual tumor size, and tumor stage, there was no statistical difference in a multivariate analysis (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.99-1.52; P = .067).

Conclusions

GC does not improve PFS over TC as first-line induction chemotherapy in OC. Although favoring TC, overall survival analyses were limited by the study design and high censoring rates.     

A multi-institutional phase II trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervical cancer

Objective

The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) in patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.

Methods

This was a multicenter phase II trial of 3 weekly paclitaxel 175 mg/m² 3-hour iv day 1 followed by carboplatin AUC5 1-hour iv day 1 for maximum of 6 cycles until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. Eligible patients had squamous or adenocarcinoma of the cervix with measurable stage IVB or recurrent, aged 20-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, prior platinum-containing regimen 0-1, and no prior taxane. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST.

Results

41 patients were enrolled, of which 39 were evaluable for analysis. 33 patients (84.6%) received prior radiotherapy. The confirmed ORR was 59% (95% CI, 43% to 75%); 5 patients (13%) achieved a complete response and median response duration was 5.2 months. The response rates for patients who had adenocarcinoma (n = 10) and prior platinum-based chemotherapy < 6 months (n = 7) were 40.0% and 0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 5.3 and 9.6 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (79%), anemia (46%), thrombocytopenia (15%), and fatigue (8%). No treatment-related death was seen.

Conclusions

TC seemed to be feasible and effective similar to other cisplatin-based doublets for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. Phase III trial is warranted to establish the clinical benefits of this combination.     

Phase II trial of adjuvant pelvic radiation "sandwiched" between combination paclitaxel and carboplatin in women with uterine papillary serous carcinoma

Objective

To evaluate the safety and survival in women treated with adjuvant pelvic radiation “sandwiched” between six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy with completely resected UPSC.

Methods

Surgically staged women with UPSC (FIGO stage 1-4) and no visible residual disease were enrolled. Treatment involved paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC = 6.0-7.5) every 21 days for 3 doses, followed by radiation therapy (RT), followed by an additional 3 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin (AUC = 5-6). Survival analysis, using Kaplan-Meier methods, was performed on patients who completed at least 3 cycles of chemotherapy and RT.

Results

A total of 81 patients were enrolled, of which 72 patients completed the first 3 cycles of chemotherapy followed by prescribed RT. Median age was 67 years (range: 43-82 years). 59/72 (82%) had disease confined to the uterus and 13/72 (18%) had completely resected extra-uterine disease (stage 3 and 4). 65 (83%) completed the protocol. Overall PFS and OS for combined stage 1 and 2 patients was 65.5 ± 3.6 months and 76.5 ± 4.3 months, respectively. PFS and OS for combined stage 3 and 4 patients was 25.8 ± 3.0 and 35.9 ± 5.3 months, respectively. Three-year % survival probability for stage 1 and 2 patients was 84% and for stage 3 and 4 patients was 50%. Of the 435 chemotherapy cycles administered, there were 11(2.5%) G3/G4 non-hematologic toxicities. 26(6.0%) cycles had dose reductions and 37(8.5%) had dose delays.

Conclusions

Compared to prior studies of single modality adjuvant therapy, RT “sandwiched” between paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy is well-tolerated and highly efficacious in women with completely resected UPSC.     

Prospective, non-randomized phase 2 clinical trial of carboplatin plus paclitaxel with sequential radical pelvic radiotherapy for uterine papillary serous carcinoma

Objective

Uterine Papillary Serous Carcinoma (UPSC) is uncommon and accounts for less than 5% of all uterine cancers. Therefore the majority of evidence about the benefits of adjuvant treatment comes from retrospective case series. We conducted a prospective multi-centre non-randomized phase 2 clinical trial using four cycles of adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiotherapy, in order to evaluate the tolerability and safety of this approach.

Methods

This trial enrolled patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients with stage 1b-4 (FIGO-1988) UPSC with a papillary serous component of at least 30%. Paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC 6) were administered on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for 4 cycles. Chemotherapy was followed by external beam radiotherapy to the whole pelvis (50.4 Gy over 5.5 weeks). Completion and toxicity of treatment (Common Toxicity Criteria, CTC) and quality of life measures were the primary outcome indicators.

Results

Twenty-nine of 31 patients completed treatment as planned. Dose reduction was needed in 9 patients (29%), treatment delay in 7 (23%), and treatment cessation in 2 patients (6.5%). Hematologic toxicity, grade 3 or 4 occurred in 19% (6/31) of patients. Patients' self-reported quality of life remained stable throughout treatment. Thirteen of the 29 patients with stages 1-3 disease (44.8%) recurred (average follow-up 28.1 months, range 8-60 months).

Conclusion

This multimodal treatment is feasible, safe and tolerated reasonably well and would be suitable for use in multi-institutional prospective randomized clinical trials incorporating novel therapies in patients with UPSC.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the feasibility of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin, and IP paclitaxel in women with newly diagnosed Stages II-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IP on day 1 and paclitaxel IP 60 mg/m² on day 8. A standard 3 + 3 design was used in the escalation phase. A two-stage group sequential design with 20 patients at the MTD was used in the feasibility phase. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was assessed pre and post treatment.

Results

Patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m² IV and carboplatin IP from AUC 5-7 on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8. The MTD was estimated at carboplatin AUC 6 IP and 25 patients enrolled at this dose level. Within the first 4 cycles, seven (35%) of twenty evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 3 neutropenic fever (3), > 2 week delay due to ANC recovery (1), grade 3 LFT (1), and grade 3 infection (1). De-escalation to paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV was given to improve the safety. After six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles without a DLT, bevacizumab was added and six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles with one DLT (grade 3 hyponatremia).

Conclusions

Paclitaxel at 175 mg/m² IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP day 8 yield 18-56% patients with DLTs. The tolerability of the regimen in combination with bevacizumab was indicated in a small cohort.     

Five-year outcomes of adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy and intravaginal radiation for stage I-II papillary serous endometrial cancer

Objective

The purpose of this study is to report our single-institution experience with concurrent adjuvant intravaginal radiation (IVRT) and carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy for early stage uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC).

Methods

From 10/2000 to 12/2009, 41 women with stage I-II UPSC underwent surgery followed by IVRT (median dose of 21 Gy in 3 fractions) and concurrent carboplatin (AUC = 5-6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) for six planned cycles. IVRT was administered on non-chemotherapy weeks. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, and the log-rank test was used for comparisons.

Results

Median patient age was 67 years (51-80 years). Surgery included hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal washings, omental biopsy, and pelvic and paraaortic lymph node sampling. FIGO 2009 stage was IA in 73%, IB in 10%, and II in 17%. Histology was pure serous in 71% of cases. Thirty-five patients (85%) completed all planned treatment. With a median follow-up time of 58 months, the 5-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 85% (95%CI, 73-96%) and 90% (95%CI, 80-100%). The 5-year pelvic, para-aortic, and distant recurrence rates were 9%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. There were no vaginal recurrences. Of the 4 pelvic recurrences, 2 were isolated and were successfully salvaged. Patients with stage II disease had lower DFS (71% vs. 88%; p = 0.017) and OS (71% vs. 93%; p = 0.001) than patients with stage I disease.

Conclusions

Concurrent adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy and IVRT provide excellent outcomes for early stage UPSC. Whether this regimen is superior to pelvic radiation will require confirmation from the ongoing randomized trial.     

Ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin, a novel triplet regimen for advanced, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix: a phase II trial

Objectives

(1) To determine the response rate of advanced, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix to ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin chemotherapy; (2) to determine the progression free interval and survival rate in patients treated with this regimen; (3) to describe the toxicities associated with this regimen; and (4) to evaluate the quality of life of patients while on treatment.

Methods

Eligible patients had histologically proven stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent carcinoma of the cervix not amenable to curative treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy. Chemotherapy was given on day 1 of a 28-day cycle: mesna (600 mg/m²) prior to ifosfamide (2 g/m²), paclitaxel (175 mg/m²), carboplatin (AUC 5). Response rates were determined according to RECIST criteria. Toxicity was graded according the National Cancer Institute's common toxicity criteria. Quality of life measurements were obtained using the FACT-Cx.

Results

Twenty-eight patients participated in this study, with 21 evaluable for response rate. Overall, 7 patients (33%) had a demonstrated objective response (4 complete responses, 3 partial responses). Stable disease was documented in 3 patients. The overall median survival for all patients was 10 months. Median progression free survival for evaluable patients was 5.0 months. Bone marrow suppression was the most common toxicity. There were no negative effects of this treatment regimen on quality of life assessments.

Conclusion

Ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin is an effective regimen in treating advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix and has an acceptable toxicity profile.     

A randomized phase III trial of IV carboplatin and paclitaxel × 3 courses followed by observation versus weekly maintenance low-dose paclitaxel in patients with early-stage ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Objective

To compare the recurrence-free interval (RFI) and safety profile in patients with completely resected high-risk early-stage ovarian cancer treated with intravenous (IV) carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without maintenance low-dose paclitaxel for 24 weeks.

Methods

Eligibility was limited to patients with stage IA/B (grade 3 or clear cell), all IC or II epithelial ovarian cancer. All patients were to receive carboplatin AUC 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² q3 weeks × 3 courses with random assignment to either observation or maintenance paclitaxel 40 mg/m²/week × 24 weeks. Recurrence required clinical or radiological evidence of new tumor.

Results

There were 571 patients enrolled onto this study, of whom 29 were deemed ineligible due to inappropriate stage or pathology, leaving 542 patients. At least 3 cycles of treatment were administered to 524/542 (97%) of patients, and among those assigned to maintenance paclitaxel, 80% completed the regimen. The incidence of grade 2 or worse peripheral neuropathy (15.5% vs. 6%), infection/fever (19.9% vs. 8.7%), and dermatologic events (70.8% vs. 52.1%) was higher on the maintenance regimen (p < 0.001). The cumulative probability of recurring within 5 years for the maintenance paclitaxel regimen is 20% vs. 23% for surveillance (hazard ratio 0.807; 95% CI: 0.565-1.15). The probability of surviving 5 years was 85.4% and 86.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Maintenance paclitaxel at 40 mg/m²/week × 24 weeks added to standard dose AUC6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m² × 3 doses provides no significant increase in RFI.     

The feasibility of carboplatin-based intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer

Objective

To reduce toxicities in cisplatin-based intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, we substituted carboplatin for cisplatin. The purpose of this study was to provide preliminary toxicity data of carboplatin-based IP chemotherapy and to evaluate the feasibility of this chemotherapy regimen in patients with ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery.

Study design

The toxicity data of 19 primary ovarian cancer patients (IP group) who underwent carboplatin-based IP and intravenous (IV) combination chemotherapy (IP carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1, IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m² on day 2, and IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m² on day 8) after primary debulking surgery were retrospectively analyzed and compared to 34 patients (IV group) who were treated with standard platinum-based IV chemotherapy during the same period.

Results

The toxicity data in a total of 118 cycles were analyzed. Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and pain were more common in the IP group than the IV group. There were seven catheter-related complications. Fourteen patients (73.7%) were able to complete six cycles or more of IP chemotherapy. Survival results in the IP group were compared with those from the IV group; a prolonged progression-free survival was observed (26.6 vs. 20.7 months; p = 0.038). Compared to the previous results with cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in hematologic events. However, gastrointestinal, neurologic, and metabolic events in this study were definitely lower compared to those of cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Carboplatin-based IP and IV combination chemotherapy is feasible in patients with ovarian carcinoma after primary debulking surgery.     

FDG-PET-based prognostic nomograms for locally advanced cervical cancer

Objective

The aim of this multi-institutional non randomized phase II trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of single agent aflibercept (VEGF Trap), a recombinant fusion protein that blocks multiple vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms, in women with gynecologic soft tissue sarcoma.

Methods

Patients were enrolled in two cohorts each with Simon two stage designs: uterine leiomyosarcoma and carcinosarcoma of endometrial, ovarian or fallopian tube origin. Eligibility criteria included ≤ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease and ECOG performance status of ≤ 2. Aflibercept 4 mg/kg was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 14 day cycle. Primary endpoints were objective response and disease stabilization (Progression Free Survival (PFS) at 6 months).

Results

41 patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma and 22 patients with carcinosarcoma (19 uterine, 3 ovarian) were enrolled on study. In the leiomyosarcoma cohort, eleven (27%) patients had stable disease (SD), 4 with SD lasting at least 24 weeks. The 6 month PFS was 17%, with median time to progression (TTP) of 1.8 (95% CI:1.6-2.1) months. In the carcinosarcoma cohort, two (9%) patients had SD, one lasting > 24 weeks, median TTP was 1.6 months (95%CI: 1.1-1.7) No partial responses were observed in patients from either cohort. Grade 3 or more aflibercept related toxicity was uncommon and included hypertension, fatigue, headache and abdominal pain.

Conclusions

Single agent aflibercept has modest activity in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma and minimal activity in women with carcinosarcoma.     

A phase II trial of thalidomide in patients with refractory uterine carcinosarcoma and correlation with biomarkers of angiogenesis: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of thalidomide in previously-treated, measurable, persistent or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus, and to explore associations between angiogenic markers with patient demographics and clinical outcome.

Methods

Eligible, consenting patients were treated until disease progression or toxicity intervened with daily starting dose of 200 mg thalidomide/day that was increased by 200 mg every 2 weeks to a target dose of 1000 mg/day. Endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) ≥ 6 months (primary), toxicity, response, overall PFS and survival. Pre- and post-treatment plasma were evaluated for a panel of angiogenic biomarkers and assessed against clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 55 enrolled patients, 45 were evaluable for toxicity and survival. Two patients (4%; 90% CI 1-13%) experienced a partial response, and 8 (18%; 90% CI 9-30%) had PFS ≥ 6 months. Median PFS was 1.9 months and median survival was 5.9 months. Grade 2-3 sensory neuropathy was noted in 6 patients, and 4, 3, and 3 patients experienced grade 3 sedation, fatigue, and constipation, respectively. Three patients had grade 4 adverse events (2 thromboembolic, 1 anemia). High pre-treatment VEGFA levels were associated with poorer PFS and survival.

Conclusions

Treatment with thalidomide met the protocol specified goal of prolonging PFS at 6 months. However, based on results with newer agents, the activity was insufficient to support further investigation. Association between pre-treatment VEGFA and prognosis in this population supports further evaluation of anti-angiogenic therapies in uterine carcinosarcoma.     

Economic impact of paclitaxel shortage in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer

Objective

To determine the potential economic impact of a paclitaxel drug shortage in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated ovarian cancer.

Methods

A modified Markov state transition model with a 6 cycle time horizon compared two scenarios: (1) Standard treatment (STD): paclitaxel 175 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC 5 × 6 cycles; (2) Paclitaxel drug shortage (DS): docetaxel 75 mg/m2/carboplatin AUC 5 × 6 cycles. Adverse events, quality of life, and costs of chemotherapy, neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, and anemia were incorporated. Key assumptions: (1) Costs and consequences were assigned only to grade 2 + neuropathy, febrile neutropenia, and grade 3-4 anemia; (2) Grade 2 + neuropathy prompted a switch from paclitaxel/carboplatin to docetaxel/carboplatin or from docetaxel/carboplatin to carboplatin alone; (3) Febrile neutropenia resulted in inpatient hospitalization followed by G-CSF prophylaxis.

Results

The mean cost of 6 cycles of chemotherapy was $4939 in the STD and $16,107 in the DS scenario, for a cost difference of $11,168 per patient over 6 cycles of treatment. STD was the dominant strategy (less expensive and more effective than the drug shortage scenario). In sensitivity analysis, DS was more costly over a wide range of clinical estimates in each arm. A drug shortage that affects approximately 50% of women initiating chemotherapy is expected to impact 779 women and cost third party payers an additional $8,699,872 monthly.

Conclusions

Our model indicates that chemotherapy drug shortages can have a significant negative impact on the average cost of primary treatment for ovarian cancer and have the potential to negatively impact health system costs.     

An open-label, single-arm Phase II study of intravenous weekly (Days 1 and 8) topotecan in combination with carboplatin (Day 1) every 21 days as second-line therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer

Objective

To evaluate clinical activity of weekly topotecan plus carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

An open-label, single-arm, multicenter Phase I/II study. Phase II was the activity assessment phase, with overall response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. Eligible patients (females aged ≥ 18 years) received study treatment at the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) identified in Phase I: intravenous topotecan 2.5 mg/m² (Days 1 and 8), followed by carboplatin AUC 5 (Day 1), every 21 days. A two-stage Green-Dahlberg design was used to assess efficacy of treatment. An ORR of ≤ 30% was required to conclude that treatment was ineffective.

Results

Twenty-two patients in Phase I permitted identification of the MTD. In Phase II, 55 patients (median age 64.0 years) were enrolled and included in the intent-to-treat population. There were six complete responses (10.9%) and 11 partial responses (20.0%), giving an ORR of 30.9% (17 patients; 95% CI: 18.7%, 43.1%). Median time to response and progression-free survival were 6.57 weeks (95% CI: 5.86, 12.57) and 44.29 weeks (95% CI: 36.14, 52.14), respectively. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity caused dose reductions, treatment delays and study discontinuation. Neutropenia (Grade 3: 29%; Grade 4: 11%) was the most common hematological adverse event (AE). Fatigue (71%) and nausea (71%) were the most common drug-related non-hematologic AEs.

Conclusions

This study showed an acceptable benefit-risk profile for topotecan plus carboplatin. Further studies using alternative dose levels could help define an optimal dosing schedule for this treatment combination in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent disease.     

A phase II clinical trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin plus bevacizumab in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), carboplatin, plus bevacizumab in patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

Methods

Patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent disease received PLD 30 mg/m² and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 5 on Day 1 plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on Days 1 and 15 of every 28-day cycle, for a maximum of 10 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) [complete + partial response]; additional endpoints were safety, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to progression (TTP).

Results

Of the 54 patients enrolled, 15 (27.8%) completed the study treatment as planned. Intent-to-treat (all enrolled patients) ORR was 72.2% (95% CI: 58.4, 83.5). Median duration of response was 11.9 months (95% CI: 9.3, not estimable) and median TTP was 13.9 months (95% CI: 11.4, 16.0). PFS was virtually the same as TTP. Three (5.6%) patients discontinued therapy due to disease progression, and another 3 (5.6 %) patients discontinued therapy due to serious adverse events (Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, Grade 3 small/large intestinal obstruction/small intestinal perforation, and Grade 3 abdominal abscess). Fifty (92.6%) patients had ≥ 1 adverse event of interest, most commonly neutropenia (42.6%), hypertension (37.0%), stomatitis (37.0%), proteinuria (37.0%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (27.8%). No appreciable decreases in left-ventricular ejection fraction were observed.

Conclusion

Most patients responded to PLD, carboplatin, and bevacizumab combination therapy. The safety profile was consistent with the known toxicities of these agents. These findings present a potential treatment option for women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.     

Addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel significantly improves progression-free survival in heavily pretreated recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective

Weekly paclitaxel has been shown to be an effective cytotoxic regimen for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), and may act through inhibition of angiogenesis. Bevacizumab, a potent angiogenesis inhibitor, has also been shown to have activity in patients with EOC. Therefore, we sought to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel led to an increased survival compared to weekly paclitaxel alone.

Methods

A single institutional review was conducted for patients with recurrent EOC treated with weekly paclitaxel (60-70 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28 day cycle and those treated with weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab (10-15 mg/kg on day 1 and 15). Response rates (RR) were calculated, and progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results

Twenty-nine patients treated with weekly paclitaxel and 41 patients treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab were identified. The groups were similar in demographics, initial optimal cytoreduction, stage, histology, grade, platinum sensitivity, and median number of previous regimens (4 vs. 4, p = 0.69).The overall response rate (ORR) was 63% (complete response (CR) 34% and partial response (PR) 29%) for paclitaxel/bevacizumab and 48% (CR 17% and PR 31%) for weekly paclitaxel (p = 0.23). Improvement in PFS was seen in those treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab in comparison to weekly paclitaxel alone (median PFS 13.2 vs. 6.2 months, p < .01). There was a trend towards improved OS for paclitaxel/bevacizumab (median OS 20.6 vs. 9.1 months; p = 0.12). Toxicities were similar between the two regimens although more bowel perforations (2 vs. 0) were seen in the paclitaxel/bevacizumab group.

Conclusion

A significant increase in PFS with a trend towards improved OS was demonstrated in this heavily pretreated population treated with paclitaxel/bevacizumab as compared to weekly paclitaxel alone. This data should be helpful in guiding future trials to determine the optimal care for women with recurrent EOC.     

A feasibility study of carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel combination chemotherapy in endometrial cancer: a Kansai Clinical Oncology Group study (KCOG0015 trial)

Objectives.

The optimal chemotherapy regimen for women with endometrial cancer has not been established. We assessed the feasibility, toxicity and clinical efficacy of combination triweekly carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in women with endometrial cancer.

Methods.

Eligible patients had histologically confirmed primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (Group A), or had localized high-risk features (Group B). All were treated with paclitaxel 80 mg/m² (days 1, 8 and 15) and carboplatin AUC 5 (day 1) each 21-day cycle. A minimum of 3 cycles was planned; if 75% or more of patients were able to receive at least 3 cycles with acceptable toxicity, the regimen was declared “feasible.”

Results.

Forty patients were enrolled and administered 163 cycles of therapy; 38 (95%) were chemo-naive. No patients received radiation previously. Group A (measurable disease) contained 15 patients (5 with recurrent disease, 7 receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and 3 treated adjuvantly following suboptimal cytoreduction). Group B (non-measurable disease) contained 25 patients (primary stage I:10, II:5, III:8, IV:1 and relapse 1). Hematological toxicities(G3/G4) were neutropenia (31%/33%) and thrombocytopenia (6%/0%). Reversible G3 hypersensitivity (5%) and G2 cardiotoxicity (3%) was uncommon. Thirty-one patients (78%) completed ≥ 3 cycles (median 4, range: 1-9). Thirteen of 15 (87%) measurable patients responded (3CR, 10PR). Eighty-seven percent of measurable patients were not progressive at 6 months. In Group A, QOL scores were significantly improved after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (p = 0.037), and at the completion of chemotherapy (p = 0.045). QOL scores in Group B did not change during therapy.

Conclusions.

This combination chemotherapy is feasible and effective for endometrial cancer patients.     

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of misoprostol and routine uterotonics for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage

Objective

To assess the effects of 400-μg sublingual misoprostol plus routine uterotonics on postpartum hemorrhage.

Methods

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed. After delivery of the child, eligible women received routine uterotonics and were randomly allocated to receive 400-μg misoprostol or placebo sublingually. The primary outcome measure was blood loss of at least 500 mL within 1 hour of taking the trial tablets.

Results

In total, 672 women received misoprostol and 673 received placebo. The baseline data were similar for both groups. Misoprostol plus routine uterotonics reduced postpartum blood loss, but the effect was not significant for blood loss of at least 500 mL (relative risk [RR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-1.45) or blood loss of at least 1000 mL (RR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.15-1.66). Misoprostol also reduced the need for non-routine oxytocin, manual removal of the placenta, and hysterectomy, but these differences were not significant either. Misoprostol was associated with pyrexia and moderate/severe shivering. There was no death in either group.

Conclusion

Misoprostol plus routine uterotonics resulted in modest reductions of blood loss in the third stage of labor, but the effects did not reach statistical significance. Larger studies are recommended.     

Carcinosarcoma of the ovary: a case-control study

Introduction

Carcinosarcoma of the ovary is a rare tumor with a grim prognosis. Chemotherapy for these tumors is chosen according to guidelines established for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The purpose of this study is to compare response to chemotherapy and survival in patients with advanced stage carcinosarcoma of the ovary.

Methods

We identified women with advanced carcinosarcoma of the ovary who underwent first-line platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. Each case was matched to two women with serous EOC. Cases and controls were matched by age, stage, and year of diagnosis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate overall survival (OS) data. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Fifty women treated with first line platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy had advanced carcinosarcoma of the ovary and were selected as cases. The response rates to chemotherapy for cases and controls were 62% and 83% (P = 0.03), respectively. Median progression-free survival was 11 months (95% CI, 8 to 14 months) versus 16 months (95% CI, 12 to 21 months; P = 0.02) and median overall survival was 24 months (95% CI, 18 to 29 months) versus 41 months (95% CI, 33 to 49 months; P = 0.002) for cases and controls, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with advanced carcinosarcoma of the ovary have a poorer response to platinum and taxane-based first-line chemotherapy and worse survival, compared to patients with serous EOC. Aggressive surgical treatment may play an important role. However, other alternative systemic therapeutic approaches should be sought for patients with carcinosarcoma of the ovary.     

A phase II evaluation of docetaxel and carboplatin followed by tumor volume directed pelvic plus or minus paraaortic irradiation for stage III endometrial cancer

Objective

To determine the feasibility and efficacy of administering docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy followed by tumor directed radiation in patients with advance stage endometrial cancer.

Methods

Patients with surgical stage III or IV (confined to the pelvis) endometrial cancer were eligible. Treatment consisted of six cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC 6) followed by irradiation to the involved field (50.4 Gy pelvis ± 43.5 Gy paraaortic) ± brachytherapy. Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods estimated overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

Results

Forty-five patients were enrolled, 34 (76.0%) completed the prescribed therapy. Median age 63.5 (35-85 years). Stage IIIA 8 (17.8%), IIIB 1 (2.2%) and IIIC 36 (80.0%). 39/45 (86.7%) had endometroid histology. Serious grade 4 toxicities included 14 non-hematologic and 2 hematologic. Sixteen patients died following treatment, 6 from recurrent progressive cancer, with a median follow-up of 35.6 months (0.4-74.8). KM estimates and standard error (SE) for OS at 1 year were 84.5%, (5.4%), at 3 years, 65.8%, (7.2%) and at 5 years, 56.7%, (7.9%). Median overall survival was 74.5 months. Fourteen patients recurred with KM estimates and standard error (SE) for PFS at 1 year 77.8%, (6.2%) and 3 year 54.4%, (6.7%). Median progression free survival was 36.9 months.

Conclusions

Docetaxel and carboplatin followed by tumor directed irradiation for advanced stage endometrial cancer has acceptable toxicity and efficacy that allows for this regimen to be considered a viable treatment option for these patients.     

Dasatinib (BMS-35482) has synergistic activity with paclitaxel and carboplatin in ovarian cancer cells

Purpose

To explore the activity of dasatinib alone and in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in ovarian cancer cells and to determine if dasatinib activity can be predicted based on evaluation of the SRC pathway.

Experimental design

Microarray analysis was performed for IGROV1, OVCAR3, A2780 and SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells and the status of the genomic SRC signature pathway was determined. Cells were treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel and dasatinib individually and in combination. Pre- and post-treatment phospho-SRC (pSRC) and SRC protein expression was determined. Dose-response curves were constructed, and drug interaction was assessed by the Combination Index (CI) method.

Results

SRC protein expression levels reflected the SRC pathway genomic signature in the cell lines with the lowest (SKOV3) and highest (IGROV1) pathway expression, but not in those with intermediate expression (OVCAR3, A2780). Dasatinib treatment caused loss of pSRC in all cell lines, with 50% growth inhibition for IGROV1 at 70 nM, OVCAR3 at 34 nM, A2780 at 4.1 μM and SKOV3 at 530 nM. Dasatinib combined with cytotoxics yielded a synergistic effect (CI = 0.46 to 0.79) in all cell lines except SKOV3.

Conclusion

Dasatinib in combination with standard chemotherapeutic agents appears to interact in a synergistic manner in some ovarian cancer cell lines. Further research is needed to evaluate tumor cell characteristics which predict response to dasatinib.