The effect of inhaled budesonide on adrenal and growth suppression in asthmatic children.

The present authors evaluated adrenal reserve in asthmatic children on long-term inhaled corticosteroids and whether possible adrenal suppression could be predicted by growth retardation. Low-dose synacthen test (0.5 microg x 1.73 m(-2)) was performed in 72 asthmatic children with a median age of 9.4 (range 4.2-15.7) yrs on long-term treatment (median 18 (range 6-84) months) with low-to-moderate doses (median 363 (range 127-1012) microg x m(-2)) of inhaled budesonide, as well as in 30 controls. Adrenal suppression was considered as a peak serum cortisol <495 nmol x L(-1). The current authors calculated height standard deviation score (HSDS) at the time of testing and height velocity SDS (HVSDS) in the preceding year. Mean HSDS was 0.06+/-1.3 and HVSDS was -0.9+/-2.3. Adrenal suppression was disclosed in 15 asthmatic children (20.8%). There were no differences in HSDS and HVSDS between children with and without adrenal suppression. There was no correlation between peak cortisol response and dose or duration of treatment. However, a positive relationship between HVSDS and duration of treatment was noted. These data suggest that long-term treatment of asthmatic children with low and moderate doses of inhaled budesonide may result in mild adrenal suppression that cannot be predicted by growth deceleration. The negative influence of inhaled corticosteroids on growth becomes less the longer the duration of treatment.     

Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on growth in asthmatic children: a comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide.

In asthmatic children inhaled corticosteroids are widely used. However, there are some concerns about the systemic adverse effects of these drugs, especially in the growing child. We performed this prospective study in order to compare the effects of 400 microg/day of budesonide (BUD) and 250 microg/day of fluticasone propionate (FP) on growth in prepubertal (aged 4-11.5 years), moderate persisting asthmatic children. One hundred patients (51 boys and 49 girls), who were randomized into two groups, were recruited for the study. The first group was treated with BUD, 2X 200 microg/day, and the second group was treated with FP, 2X 125 microg/day, by using a medium-size volume-spacer metered-dose inhaler. Growth in children with asthma who were treated by inhaled corticosteroids was calculated by growth velocity over a 12-month period. Comparisons between treatment groups were calculated by t-test and chi-square test. There were no significant differences between BUD and FP groups for sex, age, first height, and growth velocity. Moderate persisting, prepubertal asthmatic children treated with 250 microg/day of FP appeared to have no different linear growth than those children who received 400 microg/day of BUD.     

Adrenal suppression, evaluated by a low dose adrenocorticotropin test, and growth in asthmatic children treated with inhaled steroids

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of adrenal suppression and growth retardation in children using moderate doses of budesonide or fluticasone propionate. Seventy-five asthmatic children were randomly divided into three treatment groups: 30 to the fluticasone propionate (FP), 30 to the budesonide (BUD), and 15 to the cromone (CROM) group. FP doses were 500 microg/day during the first 2 months and 200 microg/day thereafter. The respective BUD doses were 800 and 400 microg/day. A low dose ACTH (0.5 microg/1.73 m2) test was performed before treatment and 2, 4, and 6 months later. The test was considered abnormal if the stimulated serum cortisol concentration was more than 2 SD lower than the pretreatment mean (<330 nmol/L). The low dose ACTH test was abnormal after both the high and low steroid doses in 23% of the children. At the 4 month measurement there were more abnormal tests in the BUD (n = 9) than in the FP (n = 5) group (P < 0.05). At that time also the stimulated concentration of serum cortisol was lower in the BUD than in the CROM group (P < 0.01), whereas the difference between the FP and CROM groups was not significant. During the study year the mean decrease in height SD score was 0.23 in the children treated with BUD, 0.03 in the children treated with FP, and 0.09 in the children treated with CROM; the difference between the BUD and FP groups was significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the low dose ACTH test revealed mild adrenal suppression in a quarter of the children using moderate doses of inhaled steroids. A FP dose of 200 microg/day caused less adrenal and growth suppression than did a BUD dose of 400 microg/day.     

Growth during one year of treatment with fluticasone propionate or sodium cromoglycate in children with asthma

The aim of this study was to compare accurately measured growth over 12 months in asthmatic children treated with either fluticasone propionate (FP) 50 μg twice daily (bid) or sodium cromoglycate (SCG) 20 mg four times daily (qid). After a 2-week run-in, asthmatic children aged 4–10 years from 15 UK centers were randomized in a 3:4 ratio to open-label FP (n = 52) or SCG (n = 70). After 8 weeks, those whose asthma was not adequately controlled were switched from SCG to FP or withdrawn. Standing height was measured (Holtain stadiometry) at baseline, after 8 weeks and at 6 week intervals thereafter for 1 year. Morning peak flows (PEF_am) were recorded by patients for 2 weeks during baseline, and 1 week before each visit during treatment. Urinary free cortisol (24 h) was measured at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. After 8 weeks, 22 patients were withdrawn from SCG group (and were switched to FP), and five patients were withdrawn from the FP group due to poor asthma control. A further 21 and 11 patients were withdrawn from the SCG and FP groups, respectively, during the course of the study. There were no significant differences between patients who received FP and SCG for 1 year (n = 34 and n = 26, respectively) in terms of height velocity adjusted for age and gender (HV), or height velocity standard deviation scores adjusted for gender (HVSDS). Mean HV (mean HVSDS) were 6.0 cm/yr (0.1) and 6.5 cm/yr (0.5) for FP and SCG, respectively. There were no treatment differences in mean 24 h urinary free cortisol levels at 6 and 12 months. Mean % predicted PEF_am improved over 1 year in both groups but to a greater degree in the FP group. We concluded that growth was normal in mildly asthmatic children receiving FP (50 μg bid) for 1 year. There were fewer withdrawals and lung function improved to a greater extent in FP treated patients than in patients receiving SCG. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1997; 24:178–186. © 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Potency ratio fluticasone propionate (Flixotide Diskus)/budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler)

In the choice of, or switch between, various inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) it is important to know equipotent doses for clinical treatment effects of the alternatives. Various ICS do have different inherent potency. Further, the ICS are delivered from inhalers that may differ markedly in output characteristics and drug delivery to intrapulmonary airways. Therefore, clinical efficacy comparisons must include drug-inhaler comparisons. We estimated the therapeutic potency ratio of the Flixotide Diskus (fluticasone propionate, FP) and the Pulmicort Turbuhaler (budesonide, BUD) in steroid-naive asthma patients, using a dose-reduction technique (FP 500-0 mcg/day, BUD 800-0 mcg/day). The dose defining end point was loss of asthma control in this paper denoted as exacerbation. In total, 282 patients with proven asthma were enrolled in the study, and 103 in the FP group and 98 in the BUD group completed the study per protocol. In total, 80 patients in the FP-group and 79 in the BUD-group experienced a dose defining exacerbation. The exacerbation frequency increased in a dose-dependent way as the dose was titrated down. From these data the potency difference between the present drug inhaler combinations, Flixotide Diskus and Pulmicort Turbuhaler, was calculated to be between 1.50:1 (95% CI 1.10:1-2.05:1) and 1.75:1 (CI 1.26:1-2.43:1) depending on if patients with insufficient steroid-response were excluded from the calculations or not. In these steroid-na?ve patients, the potency difference was evident only at low daily doses, below 200 mcg.     

A comparison of the relative growth velocities with budesonide and fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

There have been no previous large, well-designed direct comparisons of the effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on growth in children. This randomised, double-blind study compared the effects on growth of FP and BUD in children aged 6-9 years with persistent asthma. Following a 6-month run-in period (without inhaled corticosteroids), patients with normal growth velocity were randomised to 12 months' treatment with FP 100 micro g bd (n=114) or BUD 200 micro g bd (n=119). Growth velocity was determined by stadiometric height measurement. Lung function, asthma symptoms and use of relief medication were also assessed. Annualised mean growth velocity during run-in was comparable in the two groups (FP: 5.9 cm/yr; BUD: 6.0 cm/yr). During the treatment period, adjusted mean growth velocity was significantly higher in the FP than the BUD group (5.5 cm/yr vs 4.6 cm/yr; P<0.001). Asthma control improved similarly in both treatment groups. Bone mineral density and overnight urinary cortisol:creatinine ratios were similar in the two groups. Drug-related adverse events were reported among 3% of FP-treated children, compared with 2% for BUD. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that FP for childhood asthma has significantly less impact on childhood growth velocity than a therapeutically equivalent dose of BUD.     

Effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in children less than 2 years old with recurrent wheezing

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two doses of fluticasone propionate (FP) in young children with recurrent wheezing and risk factors for asthma. Our study design was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of inhaled FP 50 mcg twice daily (FP 100) and 125 mcg twice daily (FP 250), for 6 months. Outcome measures included number of wheezing episodes, days on albuterol, height standard deviation score (height SDS), osteocalcin (OC), bone alkaline phosphatase fraction (AKP), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and serum levels of cortisol (SC). Our subjects were 30 patients, aged 7-24 months. Mean wheezing episodes were 6.0 +/- 1.9, 1.9 +/- 1.9, and 2.8 +/- 1.2; mean days of albuterol use were 24.3 +/- 1.3, 6.5 +/- 0.8, and 9.1 +/- 0.8, per patient for placebo, FP100, and FP250 groups, respectively. There was a significant reduction in clinical outcome in the two FP groups compared to placebo (P < 0.01). No significant correlations were found between FP dosage and height SDS, OC, AKP, IGFBP-3, and SC. In conclusion, in young children with asthmatic symptoms, FP at 50 and 125 mcg b.i.d. for 6 months significantly improved respiratory symptoms without causing significant side effects on growth and bone metabolism.     

Oropharyngeal candidiasis with dry-powdered fluticasone propionate: 500 microg/day versus 200 microg/day

We aimed to determine the frequency of oropharyngeal candidiasis and its clinical correlates in the asthmatic patients who use fluticasone propionate (FP) as a dry powdered inhaler. We selected four groups of patients: 62 asthmatic patients who were taking 200 microg/d FP, 122 asthmatics who were taking 500 microg/d FP, 50 asthmatic patients who had not been on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment and 40 normal non-asthmatic subjects. The frequency of positive swabs for Candida colonization was higher in 500 microg/d FP group than asthmatics without ICS use (chi2 = 6.8, p < 0.05) and normal controls (chi2 = 4.9, p < 0.05), whereas it wasn't different in the 200 microg/day FP group when compared to controls. When we considered patients who used ICS, the most effective variables affecting the occurrence of Candida colonization were washing of the throat by the patients (OR = 9.4, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] = 3.9-22.7, p < 0.0001) and duration of ICS use more than 12 months (OR = 2.5, 95 % CI = 1.1-2.6, p < 0.05). The present study showed that in the patients who use ICS, the most important determinants on colonization were not washing the throat regularly and duration of ICS use for more than 12 months.     

Comparison of the effects of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy with fluticasone/salmeterol fixed-dose treatment on airway inflammation and small airway impairment in patients who need to step-up from inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy

BackgroundIf asthma patients fail to achieve symptom control using a medium dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) alone, adding a long-acting β₂ agonist (LABA) is the preferred treatment. We aimed to compare the effect of two widely available ICS/LABA combinations in these patients in real-life conditions: budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FM; Symbicort^®) for maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) and a fixed dose of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SM).MethodsInadequately controlled asthma patients treated with a medium dose of ICS alone, with an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score >0.75 and using a short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) 2–6 occasions/week, were enrolled. Patients were randomized into two groups and treated with two inhalation twice-daily BUD/FM 160/4.5 μg plus as-needed BUD/FM (SMART group, n = 15) or one inhalation twice-daily FP/SM 250/50 μg plus as-needed procaterol (FP/SM group, n = 15) for 8 weeks.ResultsBoth groups showed significant improvement in airway inflammation, pulmonary functions and symptoms from baseline. The SMART group showed significant improvement in the fraction of nitric oxide, ACQ score, rescue medication use and small airway parameter R5–R20 measured by impulse oscillometry compared with the FP/SM group.ConclusionFor stepping up treatment from ICS alone to an ICS/LABA combination, SMART is preferable for controlling asthma symptoms by suppressing airway inflammation and improving small airway impairment compared with a fixed dose of FP/SM. It may be achieved by the property of BUD/FM itself and as-needed use, but the degree of each contribution must be investigated further.     

Inflammatory and functional effects of increasing asthma treatment with formoterol or double dose budesonide

Adding a long-acting beta(2)-agonist to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthma treatment is better than increasing ICS dose in improving clinical status, although there is no consensus about the impact of this regimen on inflammation. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, asthmatics with moderate to severe disease used budesonide (400 mcg/day) for 5 weeks (run-in period); then they were randomized to use budesonide (800 mcg/day - BUD group) or budesonide plus formoterol (400 mcg and 24 mcg/day, respectively - FORMO group) for 9 weeks (treatment period). Home PEF measurements, symptom daily reporting, spirometry, sputum induction (for differential cell counts and sputum cell cultures), and hypertonic saline bronchial challenge test were performed before and after treatments. TNF-alpha, IL-4 and eotaxin-2 levels in the sputum and cell culture supernatants were determined. Morning and night PEF values increased in the FORMO group during the treatment period (p<0.01), from 435+/-162 to 489+/-169 and 428+/-160 to 496+/-173 L/min, respectively. The rate of exacerbations in the FORMO group was lower than in the BUD group (p<0.05). Neutrophil counts in sputum increased in both groups (p<0.05) and leukocyte viability after 48h-culture increased in the FORMO group (p<0.05). No other parameter changed significantly in either group. This study showed that adding formoterol to budesonide improved home PEF and provided protection from exacerbations, although increase of leukocyte viability in cell culture may be a matter of concern and needs further investigation.     

Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate vs. Budesonide as Adjunctive Treatment in Children with Asthma Exacerbation

Objectives: To compare the effects of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP) and nebulized budesonide (BUD) in addition to inhaled salbutamol in children with mild asthma exacerbation. Methods: The study was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel group design. One hundred and sixty-eight children, aged 4-15 years, were randomly allocated to receive either nebulized FP (250 mcg) or nebulized BUD (500 mcg) twice daily for 10 days. On presentation, at the end of treatment, and after a 7-day follow-up, clinical assessment and pulmonary function measurements were performed. Daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores, the use of rescue salbutamol, and morning/evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were recorded at home during the treatment period. Morning cortisol concentration (51 children) and overnight urinary cortisol excretion (30 children) were also measured in six centers at the start and at the end of the treatment. Results: Improvement of morning PEF was significantly higher in patients treated with FP (p = 0.032). The percentage of symptom-free nights was significantly higher in the BUD group (p = 0.006), but no difference was found in symptom-free days. No intergroup difference was detected in the percentage of days/nights free from rescue medication and in pulmonary function tests performed in outpatient settings. There was no evidence of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. Conclusions: A short course of nebulized FP has the same effects as a double dose of nebulized BUD, when either drug is added to bronchodilator therapy in children with mild asthma exacerbation.     

Nebulized Fluticasone Propionate vs. Budesonide as Adjunctive Treatment in Children with Asthma Exacerbation

Objectives: To compare the effects of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP) and nebulized budesonide (BUD) in addition to inhaled salbutamol in children with mild asthma exacerbation. Methods: The study was a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel group design. One hundred and sixty-eight children, aged 4–15 years, were randomly allocated to receive either nebulized FP (250 mcg) or nebulized BUD (500 mcg) twice daily for 10 days. On presentation, at the end of treatment, and after a 7-day follow-up, clinical assessment and pulmonary function measurements were performed. Daytime and nighttime asthma symptom scores, the use of rescue salbutamol, and morning/evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) values were recorded at home during the treatment period. Morning cortisol concentration (51 children) and overnight urinary cortisol excretion (30 children) were also measured in six centers at the start and at the end of the treatment. Results: Improvement of morning PEF was significantly higher in patients treated with FP (p = 0.032). The percentage of symptom-free nights was significantly higher in the BUD group (p = 0.006), but no difference was found in symptom-free days. No intergroup difference was detected in the percentage of days/nights free from rescue medication and in pulmonary function tests performed in outpatient settings. There was no evidence of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. Conclusions: A short course of nebulized FP has the same effects as a double dose of nebulized BUD, when either drug is added to bronchodilator therapy in children with mild asthma exacerbation.     

Cross-sectional study of bone density in asthmatic children

The emphasis in treatment of asthma in children has shifted from bronchodilators to inhaled anti-inflammatory medications, including inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Children with chronic asthma and moderate to severe symptoms have been targeted as particularly deserving of maintenance therapy with ICS. We have previously reported a cross-sectional study of bone density in children treated with ICS. There was no significant difference between the total bone density of asthmatic patients and controls. We sought to extend the information available on bone density in asthmatic children by evaluating 15 asthmatic subjects taking daily ICS (beclo-methasone dipropionate) and comparing them with age- and sex-matched controls. We compared total and regional bone density, bone age, and calcium intakes in these subjects. Asthmatic subjects were on ICS for 4–60 months, with doses ranging from 200 to 450 μg/day. There was no significant difference between asthmatics and matched controls for height, weight, % RDA Ca²⁺, or bone age. The asthmatic subjects had bone density (total and regional measurements) equivalent to their controls. These results provide additional support for the safety of low-dose ICS on bone density in asthmatic children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995; 20:189–192 . © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Growth of asthmatic children before long-term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids.

The aim of this study was to examine the growth of asthmatic children before any long-term inhaled corticosteroid treatment. We studied 436 asthmatic children (254 boys and 182 girls), age range 3.9-15.4 years, that had not been treated with long-term inhaled corticosteroids. In each child height and weight were measured, and the height standard deviation score (HSDS) and the weight for height ratio (%WFH) were calculated. We also estimated asthma severity and tested atopic status by skin testing. Children were grouped into three age groups: prepuberty (3.9-7.9 years), peripuberty (8-11.9 years), and puberty (12-15.5 years). HSDS was correlated to asthma severity and duration, atopic status, and other coexisting allergic diseases. Seven hundred ten healthy children (345 boys, 365 girls) ages 4.1-15.5 years were used as controls for height and weight. There was no statistically significant difference in HSDS and %WFH between patients and controls, except for HSDS of pubertal female patients that was significantly less than that of controls, x: 0.06 (0.80) vs. x: 0.40 (0.90), respectively, p < 0.02. There was also no significant correlation between HSDS or %WFH and severity or duration of the disease, allergy status and other coexisting allergic diseases. However, there was significant difference in menarcheal age between asthmatic girls x: 12.49 (0.12) and controls x: 12.00 (0.10), p < 0.001. In conclusion, our data show that the growth of asthmatic children before any long-term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids is not different from the control population, except for the asthmatic girls of pubertal age who are shorter than control girls probably because of delay in pubertal maturation.     

Inhaled corticosteroids for recurrent respiratory symptoms in preschool children in general practice: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is beneficial in patients with asthma. However, in preschool children with symptoms like cough, wheeze, or shortness of breath diagnosing asthma is difficult. Therefore, the role of ICS in the management of preschool children with recurrent respiratory symptoms is unclear. We assessed the effectiveness of ICS in preschool children with recurrent respiratory symptoms in general practice. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial, 96 children aged 1-5 years consulting their general practitioners for recurrent respiratory symptoms and in whom treatment with ICS was considered by the general practitioner were randomly allocated to receive ICS (fluticasone propionate 200 mcg/day by metered dose inhaler/spacer combination) or placebo for 6 months. Outcome assessments were carried out 1, 3, and 6 months after randomization. The primary outcome measure was the symptom score (cough, shortness of breath and wheeze during day and night) as measured by a symptom diary card. Secondary endpoints were symptom-free days, use of rescue medication, adverse events, and lung function variables as measured by the interrupter technique and forced oscillation technique. RESULTS: During the 6 months treatment period, symptoms improved in both groups, with no differences between ICS and placebo. In addition, none of the secondary outcome parameters showed differences between both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: ICS treatment has no beneficial effect in preschool children with recurrent respiratory symptoms in general practice. We therefore recommend a watchful waiting policy with only symptomatic treatment in these children. General practitioners and pediatricians should be aware of the high probability of overtreatment when prescribing ICS in these children.     

Effects of single-dose fluticasone on exercise-induced asthma in asthmatic children: a pilot study

A single high dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) can increase airway caliber in children with asthma attacks and laryngitis subglottica. Presumably the effect is due to the vasoconstrictive and antiedematous properties of topical steroids. Enlarged vessels have been suggested to play a role in the pathophysiology of exercise-induced bronchial obstruction (EIB). To investigate this, we evaluated the effect of a single high dose of fluticasone propionate (FP) on EIB in asthmatic children. Nine children aged 8-16 years with mild to moderate asthma were included. All children had a history of EIB, which was confirmed by an exercise test. None was taking ICS maintenance therapy. The children inhaled either a single dose of 1 mg FP or placebo on 2 separate days within 7-14 days. After inhalation, airway caliber (FEV(1)) was assessed for 4 hr before exercise. Then an exercise challenge was performed on a treadmill to assess EIB (% fall FEV(1)). A significant increase in FEV(1) was observed 1 hr after inhalation of FP compared to placebo. Response to exercise was expressed as maximal % fall in FEV(1) from baseline (% fall) and as area under the curve (AUC) of the 30-min time/response curve. The % fall FEV(1) after exercise and the AUC were significantly reduced when FP was inhaled compared to placebo inhalation (% fall 9.7% vs. 19.2%, respectively, P = 0.038 and AUC 92.0%.min vs. 205.7%.min, respectively, P = 0.03). There was considerable individual variability in reduction of EIB, with 5 out of 9 children having a clinically significant response. We conclude that a single high dose of inhaled FP has an acute protective effect on the bronchial response to exercise in a substantial proportion of asthmatic children.     

Improved safety with equivalent asthma control in adults with chronic severe asthma on high-dose fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVE: High-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) have been associated with the same side-effects as oral corticosteroids. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) in doses greater than 2000 microg/day are used regularly in severe asthma, despite the fact that safety and efficacy data at such high doses are limited. Fluticasone propionate (FP) has been promoted as being twice as potent clinically as BDP or BUD at doses of 2000 microg/day or less with a similar safety profile. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FP with BDP and BUD in 133 symptomatic adult asthmatics requiring at least 1750 microg/day of BDP or BUD. METHODOLOGY: Patients fulfilling the entry criteria were randomized to receive either their regular ICS medication or FP at approximately half the microgram dose for 6 months in an open, parallel group study. The primary efficacy measure was based on morning peak expiratory flow measurements recorded by patients on daily record cards, while determination of safety was based on a number of endpoints including changes in bone turnover indices, the incidence of topical side-effects and assessments of quality of life. RESULTS: It was shown that patients who were switched to FP, but not those continuing with BDP or BUD, had significant increases in levels of morning serum cortisol and the urine cortisol:creatinine ratio while maintaining asthma control. Serum osteocalcin and the pyridinoline:creatinine ratio, as well as the deoxypyridinoline:creatinine ratio, were also shown to increase only in the FP group. Subjective assessments such as quality of life score, the incidence and ease of bruising, and reports of hoarseness also favoured the FP group. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that, at the doses studied and with the delivery devices used clinically, FP is at least as effective as BDP/BUD in the management of severe asthma and may offer clinical advantages with respect to steroid-related adverse effects.     

The effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate in the treatment of young asthmatic children: a dose comparison study.

The response in asthmatic young children to inhaled steroids within the usual pediatric dose range is unknown. We therefore evaluated the dose-related response in young children with moderate asthma to inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) (delivered via the Babyhaler spacer device) within the pediatric dose range. A total of 237 children (mean age 28 mo, range 12 to 47) with moderate asthmatic symptoms were studied in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study of 12 wk treatment following a 4-wk run-in period. The median use of rescue medication was 1 dose in 2 d during the run-in period. FP 50 micrograms twice daily (FP100) and 100 micrograms twice daily (FP200) was compared with placebo inhaled from a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) and the Babyhaler spacer device. With FP200 there was a statistically significant improvement from baseline, as compared with the placebo group, in 8 of 10 diary card parameters, including the three symptom domains of wheeze, cough, and breathlessness, and use of rescue medication. FP100 produced a significant reduction in 5 of these 10 parameters, whereas no significant differences were found between the FP200 and FP100. The numbers of patients with at least one exacerbation during treatment with placebo, FP100, and FP200 were 37%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. This difference between placebo and FP200, as well as the dose-related order was significant (p < 0.05). Both FP doses were as well tolerated as placebo over the 12 wk treatment with a similar incidence of adverse effects. Asthmatic symptoms in 1- to 3-yr-old children responded in a significant and dose-related manner to treatment with FP within a pediatric dose range.     

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function after inhaled corticosteroids: unreliability of urinary free cortisol estimation

Free cortisol in the urine (UFC) is frequently measured in clinical research to assess whether inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) cause suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Thirteen healthy male subjects received single inhaled doses (of molar equivalence) of fluticasone propionate (FP), triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), budesonide (BUD), and placebo in this single blind, randomized, cross-over study. UFC output was measured using four commercial immunoassays in samples collected in 12-h aliquots over 24 h. The cortisol production rate was assessed from the outputs of cortisol metabolites. UFC showed a 100% increase over placebo levels in the Abbott TDX assay after the administration of BUD. The other assays detected variable suppression (ranging from 29-61% suppression for FP, 30-62% suppression for TAA, and 25% suppression to 100% stimulation for BUD). Suppression was more pronounced in the first 12 h after TAA and in the second 12 h after FP. Similar suppression was found in each 12-h period after BUD. UFC estimation based on immunoassays after ICS may be an unreliable surrogate marker of adrenal suppression. Many of the published studies describing or comparing the safety of different ICS should be reevaluated, and some should be interpreted with caution.     

Cost analysis of the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma: a 1-year follow-up

A retrospective cohort using pharmacy and medical claims was analysed to determine whether the differences in efficacy of various inhaled corticosteroids demonstrated in clinical trials lead to differences in costs of care observed in clinical practice. Subjects that had an ICD-9 (493.XX) code for asthma and a new pharmacy claim for inhaled fluticasone propionate 44 mcg (FP), beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), budesonide (BUD) or flunisolide (FLU) were identified and followed for 12 months. Annual asthma care charges (pharmacy and medical) over the 12-month observation period were significantly (P < 0.03) higher in patients treated with BDPTAA, BUD and FLU compared to FP, 24%, 27%, 34% and 45% respectively In addition, patients treated with BDPTAA, and FLU were associated with significantly (P < 0.005) higher total healthcare (asthma + non-asthma) charges compared to patients on FP, 53%, 46% and 39% respectively Asthma care and total healthcare charges remained lower for FP after including FP110 mcg and excluding patients who were extreme cost outliers (+/- 2 SD from the mean) in a univariate sensitivity analysis. This analysis supports recent randomized control trials that FP offers a superior efficacy profile at lower asthma care as well as total healthcare charges compared to other inhaled corticosteroids.