Biliary drainage tube evaluation after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We studied the postoperative evaluation of transcystic duct tube drainage (C-tube), T-tube drainage (T-tube), and retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage after common bile duct exploration for patients with choledocholithiasis. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed the preoperative clinical features of patients, intraoperative findings, postoperative status and management, daily output of bile, liver function, postoperative infections, and postoperative complications for patients who underwent common bile duct exploration including 16 C-tube, 17 T-tube, and 8 retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage cases. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the preoperative clinical features, intraoperative findings, or the daily output of bile from the tube. The removal day of the biliary drainage tube and postoperative hospital stay were shorter in the C-tube group than in the T-tube and retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage groups. Aspartate amino-transferase level and body temperature in the C-tube group on day 7 were lower than those in the T-tube group, and the total bilirubin level in the C-tube group on day 14 was lower than in the T-tube and retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage groups. Moreover, postoperative complications occurred significantly less frequently in the C-tube group (25.0%) than in the T-tube group (76.5%). CONCLUSIONS: C-tube drainage is thought to be most useful after common bile duct exploration for patients with choledocholithiasis.     

Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of primary closure of the common bile duct (CBD) after laparoscopic choledochotomy in patients with CBD stones. Traditionally, the CBD is closed with T-tube drainage after choledochotomy and removal of CBD stones. However, the insertion of a T-tube is not without complication and the patients have to carry it for several weeks before removal. In the laparoscopic era, surgery is performed with minimally invasive techniques in order to reduce the trauma inflicted on patients, hasten their recovery and hence reduce the hospital stay. T-tube insertion seems to negate these benefits and we believe that primary closure can be as safe as closure with T-tube drainage. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary closure of the CBD after successful laparoscopic choledochotomy for ductal stones between January 2000 and December 2003. A concurrent control group of patients who underwent T-tube drainage was used for comparison. RESULTS: Of the 64 patients that underwent laparoscopic exploration of the CBD, 24 (37%) underwent transcystic duct approach and 40 (63%) underwent choledochotomy. There were three open conversions (5%). Stone clearance was achieved in all patients with successful laparoscopic choledochotomy (100%). Of the 38 successful laparoscopic choledochotomies, 12 had primary closure of the CBD and 26 had closure with T-tube drainage. There was no mortality in both groups. One patient in the primary closure group suffered from paralytic ileus and small subhepatic collection which was treated conservatively. The median operative time (90 vs. 120 minutes, p=0.002) and postoperative stay (5 vs. 8.5 days, p=0.003) were shorter in the primary closure group when compared with the T-tube group. CONCLUSIONS: Primary closure of the CBD is feasible and as safe as T-tube insertion after laparoscopic choledochotomy for stone disease.     

Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: Study of 13 cases

In recent years, laparoscopic surgery for common bile duct (CBD) stones has been gaining wider acceptance. We report our experience with the laparoscopic management of CBD stones in 16 patients (9 males and 7 females; mean age, 62 years; range, 27–81 years). We considered two options for the laparoscopic procedures: (1) transcystic CBD exploration for those patients with fewer than 3 CBD stones, 5 mm or less in diameter, in whom the diameter of the cystic duct exceeded that of the CBD stones and (2) choledochotomy with T-tube drainage for other patients, unless a preoperative percutaneous transhepatic cholangio-drainage (PTCD) tube had been inserted. We successfully removed CBD stones by laparoscopic management in 13 of the 16 patients. The procedures employed were laparoscopic choledocholithotomy in 10 patients and laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration and stone extraction in 3 patients. We converted to open choledochotomy in 3 patients, because of severe inflammation and dense adhesions due to acute cholecystitis in 2 patients and because of wide adhesions due to previous surgery in 1. We conclude that laparoscopic procedure is a safe and effective method for the removal of CBD stones.     

Hepatectomy with primary closure of common bile duct for hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility of hepatectomy and primary closure of common bile duct for intrahepatic and extrahepatic calculi. METHODS: From January 2008 to May 2013, anatomic hepatectomy followed by biliary tract exploration without biliary drainage(non-drainage group) was performed in 43 patients with intrahepatic and extrahepatic calculi. After hepatectomy, flexible choledochoscopy was used to extract residual stones and observe the intrahepatic bile duct and common bile duct(CBD) for determination of biliary stricture and dilatation. Function of the sphincter of Oddi was determined by manometry of the CBD. Primary closure of the CBD without T-tube drainage or bilioenteric anastomosis was performed when there was no biliary stricture or sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Dexamethasone and anisodamine were intravenously injected 2-3 d after surgery to prevent postoperative retrograde infection due to intraoperative bile duct irrigation, and to maintain relaxation of the sphincter of Oddi, respectively. During the same period, anatomic hepatectomy followed by biliary tract exploration with biliary drainage(drainage group) was performed in 48 patients as the control group. Postoperative complications and hospital stay were compared between the two groups.RESULTS: There was no operative mortality in either group of patients. Compared to intrahepatic and extrabiliary drainage, hepatectomy with primary closure of the CBD(non-drainage) did not increase the incidenceof complications, including residual stones, bile leakage, pancreatitis and cholangitis(P > 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay and costs were nevertheless significantly less in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group. The median postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group(11.2 ± 2.8 d vs 15.4 ± 2.1 d, P = 0.000). The average postoperative cost of treatment was lower in the non-drainage group than in the drainage group(29325.6 ± 5668.2 yuan vs 32933.3 ± 6235.1 yuan, P = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Hepatectomy followed by choledochoendoscopic stone extraction without biliary drainage is a safe and effective treatment of hepatolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.     

Antegrade biliary stenting versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy--a comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct (LECBD) has been proven to be an effective and preferred treatment approach for uncomplicated common bile duct stones. However there is still controversy regarding the choice of biliary decompression after laparoscopic choledochotomy. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective comparison between the use of antegrade biliary stenting and T-tube drainage following successful laparoscopic choledochotomy. During the period between January 1995 and July 2003, biliary decompression was achieved by either antegrade biliary stenting or T-tube drainage based on the discretion of the operating surgeon. For antegrade biliary stenting, a 10-Fr Cotton-Leung biliary stent was inserted through the choledochotomy and passed down across the papilla. The stent position was confirmed by on-table choledochoscopy before interrupted single-layered closure of the common bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed to remove the stent 4 weeks after operation and at the same time to check for any residual stones or other complications like stricture or leak. In the T-tube group, a 16-Fr latex T-tube was used and the long limb was brought out through the subcostal trocar port followed by the same method of bile duct closure. Cholangiogram through the T-tube was performed on day 7 and the tube would be taken off 1 week later (about 2 weeks after operation) if the cholangiogram did not reveal any abnormality. The two groups were compared according to the demographic data, operation time, length of hospital stay and complication rates. RESULTS: During the study period, 108 laparoscopic explorations of the common bile duct were performed in our centre of which 95 were attempted laparoscopic choledochotomies and 13 were transcystic duct explorations. Of the 95 patients with attempted laparoscopic choledochotomy, there were 9 open conversions, 17 laparoscopic bilioenteric bypasses and 6 primary closures of the common bile duct. All of these patients together with those receiving transcystic duct explorations were excluded and the remaining 63 patients having postoperative bile diversion by either antegrade biliary stenting or T-tube drainage were included in this study. Bile diversion was achieved by antegrade biliary stenting in 35 patients whereas 28 patients had T-tube drainage. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age, clinical presentation, bilirubin level, length of hospital stay, follow-up duration, common bile duct size, size of common bile duct stones, incidence of residual/recurrent stone and complication rate. It was observed that more patients in the stenting group developed bile leak (14.2% vs. 3.5%) and required more intramuscular pethidine injections (182.86 +/- 139.30 vs. 92.81+/-81.15mg, P=0.000). On the other hand, the T-tube group had longer operation time (141.4+/-45.1 vs. 11 1.1+/-33.9 minutes, P=0.006) and had a longer postoperative hospital stay (10.0+/-7.4 vs. 8.8+/-9.3 days, P=0.020) reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative bile diversion by antegrade biliary stenting after laparoscopic choledochotomy is shown to shorten operation duration and postoperative stay as compared to T-tube drainage, but the problem of bile leak needs further refinement of insertion technique.     

腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术5 0临床分析

目的探讨腹腔镜胆总管切开探查手术的方法与优缺点。方法选择胆管结石或胆道蛔虫病患者行腹腔镜胆总管切开探查术。结果本组50例患者中48例术中分别取出直径为0.6～2.9cm的结石1,～11枚,2例患者术中分别取出死蛔虫1、2条。有6例患者因结石嵌顿或取石网故障,术中无法取净结石,其中2例肋缘下作—6cm小切口开腹取净,4例术后经T管窦道取净结石,1例患者中转开腹手术止血。手术时间117.2(45～180)min,术后6.8(3～12)d出院,30例患者术后置T管引流。未置T管即时缝合胆总管20例,其中1例出现轻度胆汁渗漏。结论腹腔镜胆总管切开探查取石术是较安全的,患者术后痛苦小、恢复快、住院期短,部分患者不置T管即时缝合胆总管更加体现微创效果o     

Various approaches of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Common bile duct(CBD) stones may occur in up to 3%–14.7% of all patients with cholecystectomy. Various approaches of laparoscopic CBD exploration plus primary duct closure(PDC) are the most commonly used and the best methods to treat CBD stone. This systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and safety of the various approaches of laparoscopic CBD exploration plus PDC for choledocholithiasis.Data sources: Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials(NRCTs)(casecontrol studies or cohort studies) were searched from Cochrane library(until Issue 2, 2015), Web of Science(1980-January 2016), Pub Med(1966-January 2016), and Baidu search engine. After independent quality assessment and data extraction, meta-analysis was conducted using Rev Man 5.1 software.Results: Four RCTs and 18 NRCTs were included. When compared with choledochotomy exploration(CE) plus T-tube drainage(TTD)(CE + TTD), CE plus PDC(CE + PDC) and CE + PDC with biliary drainage(BD)(CE + PDC + BD) had a lower rate of postoperative biliary peritonitis(OR = 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.88;P 0.05; OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.08, 0.84; P 0.05; respectively) where T-tubes were removed more than3 weeks. The operative time of CE + PDC was significantly shorter(WMD =-24.82; 95% CI:-27.48,-22.16; P 0.01) than that of CE + TTD in RCTs. Cystic duct exploration(CDE) plus PDC(CDE + PDC) has a lower rate of postoperative complications(OR = 0.39; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.67; P 0.01) when compared with CE + PDC. Confluence part micro-incision exploration(CME) plus PDC(CME + PDC) has a lower rate of postoperative bile leakage(OR = 0.17; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.74; P 0.05) when compared with CE + PDC.Conclusion: PDC with other various approaches are better than TTD in the treatment of choledocholithiasis.     

Comparison of quality of life between two biliary drainage procedures in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

BACKGROUND/AIMS: With various kinds of minimal access surgery being introduced, quality of life must be considered as a measure of whether minimal access surgery is good or not. We evaluate the difference in quality of life using two kinds of biliary drainage procedures in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. METHODOLOGY: Forty cases of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with cholecystectomy were studied to compare gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) preoperatively and postoperatively at two, five and sixteen weeks in two groups using different biliary drainage procedures. RESULTS: There was no preoperative GIQLI difference between the two groups. Cases with biliary drainage through the cystic duct achieved earlier recovery. GIQLI of all cases reached normal sixteen weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary drainage through the cystic duct in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration may help to improve the postoperative GIQLI in patients.     

Obstructive jaundice due to a textiloma mimicking a common bile duct stone

A foreign body is a rare cause of obstructive jaundice. We report a 19-year-old woman with jaundice caused by a surgical gauze in the common bile duct (CBD). Four yours earlier, she had undergone a cholecystectomy and drainage for hydatid disease of the liver. Her postoperative course was complicated by a biliary fistula that healed after 50 days. She now presented with obstructive jaundice of 2 weeks' duration. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) showed a signal-void mass, consistent with a CBD stone. Surgical exploration of the CBD revealed a surgical gauze as the cause of the obstruction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of a surgical gauze obstructing the CBD requiring surgical removal.     

Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomy

The purpose of this study was to review our experience with laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration by the transcystic approach and choledochotomy. We selected the transcystic approach for patients whose CBD stones were less than five in number and smaller than 9mm in diameter, and whose CBD was less than 15mm in diameter on cholangiograms. Among 217 patients with CBD stones treated laparoscopically, the transcystic approach was performed successfully in 91 of 104 patients in whom it was attempted (87.5%). The other 126 patients underwent laparoscopic choledochotomy, followed by ductal closure with transcystic drainage in 59, T‐tube drainage in 46, primary ductal closure in 19, and choledochoduodenostomy in 1. Choledochotomy was converted to open surgery in only 1 patient. The transcystic approach was associated with shorter hospital stay and less morbidity than choledochotomy. However, choledochotomy also had an acceptably low rate of complications. Bile leaks occurred more frequently in those with primary ductal closure than in those with transcystic drainage or T‐tube drainage. Residual stones were found in 2 patients with the transcystic approach and in 10 with choledochotomy. The residual stones were removed through the T‐tube tract by choledochoscopy in 7 of these 10 patients. From these results we conclude that laparoscopic management of CBD stones is feasible for almost all patients with CBD stones. It is considered to be safe and effective and has the advantage of being a single‐stage procedure.     

Results of retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage after a common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study is to assess the benefits of retrograde transhepatic biliary drainage (RTBD) and a primary closure after a common bile duct (CBD) exploration for patients with choledocholithiasis. METHODOLOGY: We analyzed 143 patients with choledocholithiasis who had been managed by RTBD after undergoing a CBD exploration retrospectively over a 12-year period. The main outcome criteria were frequency of occurrence of post-operative complications which needed a relaparotomy and the clinical long-term results. In addition, the radiographic diameter changes of the CBD at the site of the primary closure and liver function tests after RTBD were also evaluated. RESULTS: The frequency of bile peritonitis in the patients undergoing the RTBD procedure was only 0.7% (1 out of 143 cases). Cholangiography via the RTBD tube revealed no severe stenosis at the site of primary closure. Liver function returned to normal on day 3 after RTBD (p<0.05). Recurrence of common bile duct stones developed in 2 patients in this series during the follow-up (1-12 years). CONCLUSIONS: RTBD and a primary closure of the CBD after CBD exploration appears to be a clinically safe and effective method for such patients with choledocholithiasis who had undergone a complete stone removal intra-operatively.     

经内镜鼻胆管引流术在腹腔镜胆管探查中的作用

目的：应用经内镜鼻胆管引流术(ENBD)作为腹腔镜胆管探查术(LCBDE)胆管引流方式，探讨其应用价值。方法：对拟行腹腔镜下胆管探查的患者术前进行ENBD，后经胆总管探查切口应用液电碎石、胆道镜取石，将肝内外胆管结石取净，保留鼻胆管于胆管内，将胆总管探查切口一期缝合，常规放置腹腔引流管。术后经鼻胆管造影，肝内外胆管无残余结石，无胆漏，择期拔除腹腔引流管及鼻胆管。结果：共43例患者术前行ENBD，平均6．1d后行LCBDE。36例(83.7％)患者成功进行LCBDE，胆管探查切口一期缝合。术后经鼻胆管造影，发现1例(2．6％)术中胆道镜漏诊--小结石，经内镜取石后痊愈；无胆管狭窄及胆漏等并发症发生。另有7例患者(18．6％)中转开腹手术，其中2例保留鼻胆管，胆管切口行一期缝合，术后顺利拔除鼻胆管。38例患者(88．4％)均成功应用：ENBD进行胆管引流，平均3．2d拔除腹腔引流管，6.7d拔除鼻胆管，无相关并发症发生。结论：ENBD作为LCBDE胆管引流，是安全有效的方式，且术后引流时间短，并发症少，可充分发挥出腹腔镜治疗胆管结石微创的优势。     

Anatomical variations of the cystic duct： Two case reports

Anatomical variations of the cystic duct often occur and may be encountered during cholecystectomy. Knowledge of the variable anatomy of the cystic duct and cysticohepatic junction is important to avoid significant ductal injury in biliary surgery. Here, we present two unusual cases with an anomalous cystic duct, namely, low lateral insertion and narrow-winding of the cystic duct. The first case was a 64-year-old man with cholelithiasis and chronic cholecystitis. During surgery, the entrance of the cystic duct was misidentified as being short and leading into the right hepatic duct. Further exploration showed multiple calculi in the right and common hepatic ducts. Cholecystectomy was completed, followed by T-tube drainage of the common and right hepatic ducts. Postoperative T-tube cholangiography demonstrated that the two T tubes were respectively located in the cystic and common hepatic duct. Six weeks later, the retained stones in the distal choledochus were extracted by cholangioscopy through the sinus tract of the T-tube. The second case was a 41-year-old woman, in which, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography （ERCP） revealed a long cystic duct, with a narrow and curved-in lumen. The patient underwent open cholecystectomy. Both patients were cured. The authors propose that preoperative ERCP or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography （MRCP）, and intraoperative cholangiography or cholangioscopy constitute a useful and safe procedure for determining anatomical variations of the cystic duct.     

25例肝包虫囊肿破入胆道的诊治体会

目的探讨肝包虫囊肿破入胆道的诊断及治疗方式。方法回顾分析我院2001年～2011年行手术治疗的25例肝包虫囊肿破入胆道患者的临床表现、实验室检验、影像学检查、手术方式及治疗效果。结果超声、CT、磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)及内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)对于肝包虫囊肿破入胆道均具有良好的诊断价值,其中ERCP诊断价值最高,确诊率可达100%。25例患者中22例手术方式为胆囊切除、胆总管探查、T管引流+肝包虫残腔引流,其余3例行胆囊切除、胆总管探查、T管引流+肝包虫病灶根治性切除。所有患者均痊愈出院。结论超声因普及易行,应作为诊断肝包虫囊肿破入胆道的首选辅助检查,MRCP检查具有诊断准确率高和无创等优点,ERCP则对肝包虫囊肿破入胆道诊断率最高。胆囊切除、胆总管探查、T管引流+肝包虫残腔引流应作为肝包虫囊肿破入胆道首选手术方式,对于部分复杂病例可行胆囊切除、胆总管探查、T管引流+肝包虫病灶根治性切除,效果良好。     

Laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct lithiasis

With the advances of videolaparoscopic surgery, this approach had become the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis. However, about 5% to 10% may present common bile duct lithiasis. Most surgeons have still difficulties to deal with this situation and do prefer resolve with open surgery or with further endoscopic approach. We present a case of a 60-year-old man, with 18 months history of right upper quadrant pain, weight loss and jaundice. He was referred with diagnostic of pancreatic cancer. Laboratory investigation showed increased bilirubin (10 mg/dL), alkaline phosphatase and GGT. Abdominal ultrasound showed atrophic gallbladder with dilated intra and extrahepatic biliary tree. Computerized tomography scan disclosed enlarged biliary tree with 3 cm stone in the distal common bile duct. The patient underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy followed by choledochotomy and retrieval of the large stone. A latero-lateral choledochoduodenum anastomosis was then performed to decompress the biliary tree. The patient had an uneventful recovery being discharged at the 6th postoperative day. Laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis is feasible in many patients, specially those with dilated biliary tree. The retrieval of stones may be followed by biliary drainage with T-tube. In some elderly patients with chronically dilated common bile duct, as in the present case, a choledochoduodenal anastomosis is the procedure of choice.     

Technical aspects in the laparoscopic management of complicated common bile duct stones

The management of common bile duct (CBD) stones traditionally required open laparotomy and bile duct exploration. With the advent of endoscopic and laparoscopic technology in the latter half of last century, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the mainstream treatment for CBD stones and gallstones in most medical centers around the world. However, in certain situations, ERCP cannot be feasible because of difficult cannulation and extraction. ERCP can also be associated with potential serious complications, in particular for complicated stones requiring repeated sessions and additional maneuvers. Since our first laparoscopic exploration of the CBD (LECBD) in 1995, we now adopt the routine practice of the laparoscopic approach in dealing with endoscopically irretrievable CBD stones. The aim of this article is to describe the technical details of this approach and to review the results from our series.     

Experience with MTBE as a solvent for common bile duct stones in patients with T-tube in situ

The postcholecystectomy patients who have a T-tube in situ offer a convenient route through the T-tube to perfuse solvents into the common bile duct (CBD) for dissolving any retained common duct stones. If successful, this approach is much simpler and cheaper than the usual therapeutic modality used for CBD stones, namely, endoscopic papillotomy. Thus a most potent cholesterol solvent, methyl t-butyl ether (MTBE) was perfused through the T-tube into the CBD of five patients with retained common duct stones. The dose of the solvent varied, 1.5-5 mL 0.5-1 h, given 7-13 times amounting to a total of 20-66 mL. Instillation of MTBE in the T-tube was alternated with aspiration of the bile through T-tube. Only one patient showed complete disappearance of the bile duct stone following MTBE perfusion. Others did not show any appreciable response and had to be treated by endoscopic papillotomy (three patients) or mono-octanoin perfusion (one patient). Side-effects of MTBE perfusion included pain in the abdomen in all patients, somnolence and nausea/vertigo in two patients and the smell of ether on the breath in two patients. It is concluded that MTBE is not an effective agent for dissolution of retained CBD stones in patients with T-tube in situ.     

Common bile duct injury by fibrin glue: Report of a rare complication

Fibrin glue is widely used in clinical practice and plays an important role in reducing postoperative complications.We report a case of a 65-year-old man, whose common bile duct was injured by fibrin glue, with a history of failed laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open operation for uncontrolled laparoscopic bleeding.In view of thepersistent liver dysfunction, xanthochromia and skin itching, the patient was admitted to us for further management.Ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) revealed multiple stones in the common bile duct, and liver function tests confirmed the presence of obstructive jaundice and liver damage.Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was unsuccessfully performed to remove choledocholithiasis, but a small amount of tissue was removed and pathologically confirmed as calcified biliary mucosa.This was followed by open surgery for suspicious cholangiocarcinoma.There was no evidence of cholangiocarcinoma, but the common bile duct wall had a defect of 8 mm × 10 mm at Calot’s triangle.A hard, grid-like foreign body was removed, which proved to be solid fibrin glue.Subsequently, the residual choledocholithiasis was removed by a choledochoscopic procedure, and the common bile duct deletion was repaired by liver round ligament with T-tube drainage.Six months later, endoscopy was performed through the T-tube fistula and showed a well-repaired bile duct wall.Eight months later, MRCP confirmed no bile duct stenosis.A review of reported cases showed that fibrin glue is widely used in surgery, but it can also cause organ damage.Its mechanism may be related to discharge reactions.     

Drainage of a malignant common hepatic duct obstruction by a biliary endoprosthesis placed through a T-tube tract: technical note

For patients with high biliary obstruction drained by a T-tube, achieving internal drainage requires special techniques. Modification of a method described by Sammon for common bile duct obstruction permits placement of a biliary endoprosthesis astride the T-tube tract. The key step is traction exerted downward on the endoprosthesis by a suture passing through a second catheter temporarily inserted into the common bile duct. A case is described in which the technique has been applied successfully.     

Asymptomatic T-tube remnant in common bile duct.

A 46-year-old lady presented with itching, five years after a primary common bile duct repair following cholecystectomy. Prior to this she underwent an interno-external biliary drainage. At laparotomy the horizontal limb of a T-tube was found in the common hepatic duct. Eleven months after a Roux loop hepatico-jejunostomy she is asymptomatic.