Aromatherapy as a safe and effective treatment for the management of agitation in severe dementia: the results of a double-blind,placebo-controlled trial with Melissa

BACKGROUND: Behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia are frequent and are a major management problem, especially for patients with severe cognitive impairment. Preliminary reports have indicated positive effects of aromatherapy using select essential oils, but there are no adequately powered placebo-controlled trials. We conducted a placebo-controlled trial to determine the value of aromatherapy with essential oil of Melissa officinalis (lemon balm) for agitation in people with severe dementia. METHOD: Seventy-two people residing in National Health Service (U.K.) care facilities who had clinically significant agitation in the context of severe dementia were randomly assigned to aromatherapy with Melissa essential oil (N = 36) or placebo (sunflower oil) (N = 36). The active treatment or placebo oil was combined with a base lotion and applied to patients' faces and arms twice a day by caregiving staff. Changes in clinically significant agitation (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory [CMAI]) and quality of life indices (percentage of time spent socially withdrawn and percentage of time engaged in constructive activities, measured with Dementia Care Mapping) were compared between the 2 groups over a 4-week period of treatment. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients completed the trial. No significant side effects were observed. Sixty percent (21/35) of the active treatment group and 14% (5/36) of the placebo-treated group experienced a 30% reduction of CMAI score, with an overall improvement in agitation (mean reduction in CMAI score) of 35% in patients receiving Melissa balm essential oil and 11% in those treated with placebo (Mann-Whitney U test; Z = 4.1, p < .0001). Quality of life indices also improved significantly more in people receiving essential balm oil (Mann-Whitney U test; percentage of time spent socially withdrawn: Z = 2.6, p = .005; percentage of time engaged in constructive activities: Z = 3.5, p = .001). CONCLUSION: The finding that aromatherapy with essential balm oil is a safe and effective treatment for clinically significant agitation in people with severe dementia, with additional benefits for key quality of life parameters, indicates the need for further controlled trials.     

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of risperidone for the treatment of aggression,agitation, and psychosis of dementia

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial examined the efficacy and safety of risperidone in the treatment of aggression, agitation, and psychosis in elderly nursing-home patients with dementia. METHOD: Elderly patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type, vascular dementia, or a combination of the 2 (i.e., mixed dementia) and significant aggressive behaviors were randomized to receive, for a period of 12 weeks, a flexible dose of either placebo or risperidone solution up to a maximum of 2 mg/day. Outcome measures were the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease (BEHAVE-AD) rating scale, and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and of Change (CGI-C) scales. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were randomized to treatment with risperidone or placebo, and 337 patients received at least one dose of study drug. The trial was completed by 67% of patients in the placebo group and 73% of patients in the risperidone group. The mean +/- SE dose of risperidone was 0.95 +/- 0.03 mg/day. The primary endpoint of the study, the difference from baseline to endpoint in CMAI total aggression score, showed a significant reduction in aggressive behavior for risperidone versus placebo (p <.001). A similar improvement was also seen for the CMAI total non-aggression subscale (p <.002) and for the BEHAVE-AD total (p <.001) and psychotic symptoms subscale (p =.004). At endpoint, the CGI-S and the CGI-C scores indicated a significantly greater improvement with risperidone compared with placebo (p <.001). Overall, 94% and 92% of the risperidone and placebo groups, respectively, reported at least 1 adverse event. Somnolence and urinary tract infection were more common with risperidone treatment, whereas agitation was more common with placebo. There was no significant difference in the number of patients who reported extrapyramidal symptoms between the risperidone (23%) and placebo (16%) groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with low-dose (mean = 0.95 mg/day) risperidone resulted in significant improvement in aggression, agitation, and psychosis associated with dementia.     

Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in a large sample of Dutch nursing home patients with dementia

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia patients in Dutch nursing homes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study in a large sample of 1322 demented patients living in 59 dementia special care units (SCUs) in The Netherlands. Symptoms were observed by licensed vocational nurses during regular care-giving in a 2-week observational period prior to assessment. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory- Nursing home version (NPI-NH; frequency X severity score >/= 4) and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI; symptoms occurring at least once a week). RESULTS: More than 80% of these patients suffered from at least one clinically significant symptom, as defined with the NPI-NH frequency X severity score >/= 4. Measured with the NPH-NH agitation/aggression, apathy and irritability were the most frequently observed behaviors, with prevalences of 30-35%. Using the CMAI, 85% of the patients showed at least one symptom of agitation, of which general restlessness was observed most frequently (44%). Other frequently observed symptoms with prevalence rates of 30% were cursing or verbal aggression, constant request for attention, negativism, repetitious sentences, mannerisms, pacing, and complaining. Physically aggressive symptoms such as hitting, kicking, biting occurred less often (less than 13%). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence rates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Dutch nursing home patients with dementia residing in SCUs are high, especially agitation and apathy. Insight into the prevalence rates of individual symptoms in patients with dementia has important practical consequences for the accurate planning of staff allotment and stresses the need for patient oriented care.     

Health-related quality of life in patients with schizophrenia during treatment with long-acting, injectable risperidone

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of treatment with long-acting, injectable risperidone versus placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with schizophrenia. Results are discussed in the context of HRQoL in the general U.S. population. METHOD: Patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia entered a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After screening, previous antipsychotics were discontinued, and oral risperidone was titrated up to a dose of 4 mg/day over 1 week. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive placebo [N = 92] or long-acting risperidone (25 [N = 93], 50 [N = 97], or 75 mg [N = 87] every 2 weeks) for 12 weeks. HRQoL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-item questionnaire (SF-36). RESULTS: At week 12, patients receiving long-acting risperidone had improved significantly (p <.05) in 5 domains of the SF-36 (bodily pain, general health, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health) compared with patients receiving placebo. The effect was greatest for the 25-mg group, with significant improvement versus placebo in 6 domains (p <.05). At baseline, all SF-36 domain scores except bodily pain were significantly lower (p <.05) than normal values in all groups. With placebo, scores in all 8 domains remained below normal values after 12 weeks, while patients receiving long-acting risperidone showed improvement in HRQoL toward normal levels, with clinically meaningful improvements in all mental-health domains. In the 25-mg group, scores in 7 domains were not statistically different from normal values after 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting, injectable risperidone improved HRQoL toward normal levels. After 12 weeks, HRQoL of patients receiving 25 mg was not significantly different from normal.     

Actigraphic measurement of agitated behaviour in dementia

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the correlation between actigraphic measures and a validated assessment scale of agitated behaviour in dementia, the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). METHODS: A total of 110 patients were included. Patients either suffered from Alzheimer dementia (AD), mixed dementia (MXD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) or diffuse Lewy body disease (DLB). All patients underwent actigraphic recordings for 48 h. CMAI was scored by professional caretakers, who were responsible for the patient during his or her actigraphic recording. RESULTS: Patients with high total CMAI scores (>or= 50) clearly had higher levels of activity during the day as measured by means of actigraphy than patients with low total CMAI scores (ANOVA, F=126.75, p<0.0001). Patients with low MMSE scores (<20) also had higher activity levels during the day than patients with higher MMSE scores (ANOVA, F= 85.74, p<0.0001). Correlations between ctigraphic data and CMAI total scores were moderate but highly significant. CONCLUSION: We conclude that actigraphy is a useful tool to examine agitated behaviour in dementia.     

Quetiapine to treat agitation in dementia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

In this 10-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, elderly institutionalized patients with dementia and agitation were randomized (3:3:2) to quetiapine 200mg/day, 100mg/day, or placebo. The primary endpoint was change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)-Excitement Component (EC) scores at endpoint, analysed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) and observed cases (OC) approaches. Other efficacy measures were the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and response rates (percentage with > or =40% reduction [PANSS-EC]; "much" or "very much improved" [CGI-C]), Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version (NPI-NH), and Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). The key safety measure was incidence of adverse events; change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was also assessed. Baseline characteristics of 333 participants (quetiapine 200mg/day, n=117; quetiapine 100mg/day, n=124; placebo, n=92) and completion rates (63-65%) were comparable among groups. Compared with placebo, quetiapine 200mg/day was associated with clinically greater improvements in PANSS-EC (LOCF, p=0.065; OC, p=0.014 [ANCOVA]), CGI-C (LOCF, p=0.017; OC, p=0.002 [ANOVA]), and CGI-C response rates (LOCF, p=0.002; OC, p<0.001 [Chi-square test]). Quetiapine 100mg/day did not differentiate from placebo on these measures. There were no between-group differences in NPI-NH or CMAI. Incidences of cerebrovascular adverse events, postural hypotension, and falls were similar among groups. MMSE did not change in any group. Mortality was numerically higher in the quetiapine groups; rates were not statistically different from placebo. The results of this study suggest that quetiapine 200mg/day was effective and well-tolerated for treating agitation associated with dementia. However, caution should be exercised given the concerns regarding increased mortality with atypical antipsychotics in this vulnerable patient population.     

Behavioral and psychological symptoms in patients with dementia as a target for pharmacotherapy with risperidone

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of risperidone on specific behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). METHOD: We conducted a post hoc exploratory analysis of an integrated database from 3 randomized, controlled trials of risperidone versus placebo in treating 1150 nursing home residents with BPSD. Changes in scores were measured for items on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD). RESULTS: On the CMAI, risperidone was significantly more effective in treating hitting (p = .000), hurt self or other (p = .005), cursing or verbal aggression (p = .000), repetitive sentences or questions (p = .001), scratching (p = .041), general restlessness (p = .001), grabbing onto people (p = .028), constant request for attention (p = .041), pacing and aimless wandering (p = .013), and performing repetitious mannerisms (p = .045). On the BEHAVE-AD, risperidone was significantly more effective in treating physical threats and/or violence (p = .000), verbal outbursts (p = .000), other anxieties (p = .01), agitation (p = .000), tearfulness (p = .03), and nonparanoid delusions (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The items from the BEHAVE-AD and CMAI that were improved with risperidone included psychotic, agitated, and aggressive symptoms. These data suggest that risperidone is more effective than placebo in treating a variety of symptoms associated with dementia.     

Prevalence and correlates of disruptive behavior in patients in Norwegian nursing homes

BACKGROUND: Although Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) increase with increasing dementia severity, and institutionalization of an individual with dementia is often caused by behavioral symptoms, relatively few studies have explored the prevalence of BPSD in nursing homes. OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence and correlates of agitation in residents with dementia, in Norwegian nursing homes. METHODS: This study has taken place in dementia wards in four Norwegian nursing homes. To measure agitation in residents with dementia we used the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), consisting of 29 agitation items. Dementia stage was measured by Functional Assessment Staging (FAST). RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven patients (71% female) were included in the study: mean (SD) age 85.5 (8.4), FAST 4.7 (2.1), CMAI total sumscore 39.5 (12.6). Dementia was present in 167 (79%) subjects. Among those with dementia, weekly occurrence of at least one CMAI item (i.e. a score of 3 or higher) occurred in 75.4% (95% CI 68.4-81.4). Six of the items occurred at least weekly in 20% of the residents with dementia, and 11 of the items, including physical aggression, occurred in less than 5% of the residents. Agitation was associated with more severe dementia (p = 0.001), but not with age and gender. CONCLUSION: Symptoms of agitation were common, but may nevertheless be lower compared to findings in other geographical areas. Further studies are warranted to test this hypothesis, and if confirmed, to explore possible causes for such differences.     

Withdrawal from controlled carbamazepine therapy followed by further carbamazepine treatment in patients with dementia.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of withdrawal from placebo and carbamazepine administered for agitation associated with dementia and to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subsequent ongoing carbamazepine therapy. METHOD: We previously reported the results of a 6-week, randomized, parallel-group study of placebo versus carbamazepine in 51 nursing home patients with dementia who were agitated; 47 subjects completed that study. This report first presents the results of withdrawal from that experimental treatment assessed by (blinded) observations 3 weeks later (N = 45 remaining). The primary outcome measure was the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Secondary outcome measures addressed other aspects of behavior, cognition, function, safety, and tolerability. Patients were then treated with carbamazepine for an additional 6 weeks (N = 32 remaining) or 12 weeks (N = 25 remaining), with the same assessments performed. RESULTS: Patients who had previously shown behavioral improvement with carbamazepine therapy reverted to their baseline state after washout, whereas there was no change in the patients previously treated with placebo. There were no other significant effects of washout. During subsequent therapy with carbamazepine at a modal dose of 300 mg/day, there were 2 deaths and 4 other adverse events resulting in dropout. Neither of the deaths, and only 1 serious adverse experience, was judged to be related to carbamazepine. There were a variety of nonserious adverse experiences during the trial. Behavior ratings showed ongoing improvement in agitation and aggression, as well as in other aspects of psychopathology. CONCLUSION: The washout data provided independent confirmation of efficacy found in the prior placebo-controlled phase of this trial. Ongoing treatment was not associated with unexpected toxicity and was associated with improvement in measures of agitation and aggression that appeared to continue for up to 12 weeks. These findings confirm and extend results from earlier placebo-controlled studies.     

Opioids versus antidepressants in postherpetic neuralgia: a randomized,placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) provide less than satisfactory pain relief for postherpetic neuralgia (PHN), and the role of opioids is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the analgesic and cognitive effects of opioids with those of TCA and placebo in the treatment of PHN. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with PHN were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial. Each subject was scheduled to undergo three treatment periods (opioid, TCA, and placebo), approximately 8 weeks' duration each. Doses were titrated to maximal relief or intolerable side effects. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity (0 to 10 scale), pain relief (0 to 100%), and cognitive function. Analyses included patients who provided any pain ratings after having received at least a single dose of a study medication. RESULTS: Fifty patients completed two periods, and 44 patients completed all three. Mean daily maintenance doses were morphine 91 mg or methadone 15 mg and nortriptyline 89 mg or desipramine 63 mg. Opioids and TCA reduced pain (1.9 and 1.4) more than placebo (0.2; p < 0.001), with no appreciable effect on any cognitive measure. The trend favoring opioids over TCA fell short of significance (p = 0.06), and reduction in pain with opioids did not correlate with that following TCA. Treatment with opioids and TCA resulted in greater pain relief (38 and 32%) compared with placebo (11%; p < 0.001). More patients completing all three treatments preferred opioids (54%) than TCA (30%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Opioids effectively treat PHN without impairing cognition. Opioids and TCA act via independent mechanisms and with varied individual effect.     

A pilot study on a home-based caregiver training program for improving caregiver self-efficacy and decreasing the behavioral problems of elders with dementia in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a home-based caregiver training program for caregivers of elders with dementia and behavioral problems. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in the communities of Northern Taiwan. Forty-eight patients with dementia and their family caregivers were included. The experimental group (n = 24) received a two-session in-home caregiver training program, and the control group (n = 24) received only written educational materials. The Chinese version of Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), community form, was used to measure the behavioral problems of patients with dementia. The caregiver's self-efficacy, for managing the demented person's agitation, was measured by the Agitation Management Self-efficacy Scale (AMSS). The CMAI and AMSS were administered before (baseline), three weeks (1st post-test), and three months (2nd post-test) after the two-session training program. RESULTS: Except for the physically aggressive behavior subscale, the scores of physically non-aggressive behavior, verbally aggressive and non-aggressive behavior subscales as well as the overall CMAI decreased significantly and continuously in the experimental group and differed significantly from the changed scores from those in the control group (p < 0.05). Physically aggressive behaviors showed a decreasing trend for both groups. Scores of the Agitation Management Self-Efficacy Scale and its subscales increased significantly and continuously in the experimental group in comparison to those in the control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This home-based caregiver training program is helpful for decreasing problematic behaviors of elder people with dementia and it improves the caregiver's self-efficacy for managing problematic behaviors.     

Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Nabilone for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of nabilone for agitation in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD).DesignThis 14-week randomized double-blind crossover trial compared nabilone to placebo (6 weeks each) with a 1-week washout between phases.SettingPatients were recruited from a long-term care facility and geriatric psychiatry clinics.ParticipantsPatients had AD (standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [sMMSE ≤24]) and agitation (Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home version [NPI-NH]-agitation/aggression subscore ≥3).InterventionNabilone (target 1–2 mg) versus placebo.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was agitation (Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory [CMAI]). Secondary outcomes included NPI-NH total, NPI-NH caregiver distress, cognition (sMMSE and Severe Impairment Battery [SIB] or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale of Cognition), global impression (Clinician's Global Impression of Change [CGIC]), and adverse events.ResultsThirty-nine patients (mean ± SD age = 87 ± 10, sMMSE = 6.5 ± 6.8, CMAI = 67.9 ± 17.6, NPI-NH total = 34.3 ± 15.8, 77% male, nabilone dose = 1.6 ± 0.5 mg) were randomized. There were no crossover or treatment-order effects. Using a linear mixed model, treatment differences (95% CI) in CMAI (b = −4.0 [−6.5 to −1.5], t(30.2) = −3.3, p = 0.003), NPI-NH total (b = −4.6 [−7.5 to −1.6], t(32.9) = −3.1, p = 0.004), NPI-NH caregiver distress (b = −1.7 [−3.4 to −0.07, t(33.7) = −2.1, p = 0.041), and sMMSE (b = 1.1 [0.1–2.0], t(22.6) = 2.4, p = 0.026) all favored nabilone. However, in those who completed the SIB (n = 25) treatment differences favored placebo (b = −4.6 [−7.3 to −1.8], t(20.7) = −4.8, p = 0.003). CGIC improvement during nabilone (47%) and placebo (23%) was not significantly different (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.09). There was more sedation during nabilone (45%) compared to placebo (16%) phases (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.02), but treatment-limiting sedation was not significantly different (McNemar's test, exact p = 0.22).ConclusionsNabilone may be an effective treatment for agitation. However, sedation and cognition should be closely monitored.     

Divalproex sodium in nursing home residents with possible or probable Alzheimer Disease complicated by agitation: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Three placebo-controlled clinical trials have suggested the benefit of valproate for treatment of agitation associated with dementia; one was used as the basis for this multicenter trial, conducted by the Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Cooperative Study. It addresses the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of divalproex sodium for the treatment of agitation associated with dementia. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 153 nursing home residents with probable or possible AD complicated by agitation; 110 (72%) completed the trial. Participants were randomized to treatment with divalproex sodium at a target dose of 750 mg/day (N = 75) or placebo (N = 78) for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Agitation factor. Secondary outcomes included total BPRS, Clinical Global Impression of Change, Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory score, and measures of safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Compliance averaged 88%. Participants receiving divalproex achieved a mean dose of 800 mg/day. Change in mean BPRS Agitation factor scores did not differ between patients treated with divalproex and placebo, nor did secondary behavioral measures. Measures of safety and tolerability did not reveal clinically important drug/placebo differences. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter trial showed no benefit of divalproex sodium for treatment for agitation in dementia at a mean dose of 800 mg/day over 6 weeks. The results do not support findings from previous trials indicating possible benefit.     

Aripiprazole for the treatment of psychoses in institutionalized patients with Alzheimer dementia: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled assessment of three fixed doses.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole for psychosis associated with Alzheimer dementia (AD). METHODS: In this double-blind, multicenter study, 487 institutionalized patients with psychosis associated with AD were randomized to placebo or aripiprazole, 2, 5 or 10 mg/day. Primary efficacy assessment was the mean change from baseline to week 10 on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home (NPI-NH) version Psychosis Subscale score. Secondary measures included NPI-NH Total, Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Core and Total, and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) scores. RESULTS: Aripiprazole 10 mg/day showed significantly greater improvements (mean change [2 x SD]) than placebo on the NPI-NH Psychosis Subscale (-6.87 [8.6] versus -5.13 [10.0]; F = 6.29, df = 1, 422, p = 0.013 by analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]); CGI-S (-0.72 [1.8] versus -0.46 [1.6]; F = 4.68, df = 1, 419, p = 0.031 [ANCOVA]); BPRS Total (-7.12 [18.4] versus -4.17 [21.6]; F = 4.72, df = 1, 399, p = 0.030 [ANCOVA]); BPRS Core (-3.07 [6.9] versus -1.74 [7.8]; F = 7.30, df = 1, 407, p = 0.007 [ANCOVA]); CMAI (-10.96 [22.6] versus -6.64 [28.6]; F = 5.23, df = 1, 410, p = 0.023 [ANCOVA]), and NPI-NH Psychosis response rate (65 versus 50%; chi(2) = 5.52, df = 1, p = 0.019 [CMH]). Aripiprazole 5 mg/day showed significant improvements versus placebo on BPRS and CMAI scores. Aripiprazole 2 mg/day was not efficacious. Cerebrovascular adverse events were reported: aripiprazole 2 mg/day, N = 1; 5 mg/day, N = 2; 10 mg/day, N = 4; placebo, N = 0. No deaths in any group (aripiprazole 2 mg/day, 3%; 5 mg/day, 2%; 10 mg/day, 7%; placebo, 3%) were considered to be treatment-related. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole 10 mg/day was efficacious and safe for psychosis associated with AD, significantly improving psychotic symptoms, agitation, and clinical global impression. However, clinicians should be aware of the safety considerations of atypical antipsychotic uses in this population.     

A randomized trial of risperidone, placebo, and haloperidol for behavioral symptoms of dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare effects of risperidone with placebo (efficacy and tolerability) and haloperidol (tolerability) for treating demented patients with aggression and other behavioral symptoms. METHODS: A 13-week double-blind study involving 344 patients with dementia randomly assigned to receive placebo or flexible doses (0.5 to 4 mg/d) of risperidone or haloperidol. Behavioral symptoms were assessed by the Behavior Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD), the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI), and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. Tolerability assessments included the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale, sedation levels, Functional Assessment Staging, Mini-Mental State Examination, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: The mean dose at endpoint was 1.1 mg/d of risperidone and 1.2 mg/d of haloperidol. Although not significant, a higher percentage of patients receiving risperidone than those receiving placebo showed clinical improvement (> or =30% reduction from baseline to endpoint in BEHAVE-AD total score) at endpoint and week 12. Reductions in the BEHAVE-AD total score were significantly greater with risperidone than with placebo at week 12. In a further analysis of aggression, the most dominant symptom in these patients, BEHAVE-AD and CMAI aggression cluster scores were significantly reduced compared with placebo at endpoint and week 12. CGI scores were also significantly reduced at endpoint and week 12. Severity of extrapyramidal symptoms with risperidone did not differ significantly from that of placebo and was less than that of haloperidol. A post hoc analysis showed significantly greater reductions in the BEHAVE-AD aggressiveness score with risperidone than haloperidol at week 12. CONCLUSION: Low-dose risperidone (mean 1.1 mg/d) was well tolerated and associated with reductions in the severity and frequency of behavioral symptoms, particularly aggression, in elderly patients with dementia.     

齐拉西酮治疗老年痴呆精神行为障碍对照研究

目的：探讨齐拉西酮和氟哌啶醇对老年期痴呆患者精神行为症状（BPSD）的疗效和安全性。方法：将60例老年期痴呆伴BPSD患者随机分成两组,分别使用齐拉西酮和氟哌啶醇治疗8周,采用痴呆病理行为评定量表（BEHAVE-AD）,激越行为量表（CMAI）及治疗中出现的症状量表（TESS）评定疗效和不良反应。结果：两组治疗前后BEHAVE-AD和CMAI评分显著下降（P〈0.01）,两组患者之间治疗前后BEHAVE-AD总减分值差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,但情感障碍和焦虑两因子减分值差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：齐拉西酮和氟哌啶醇治疗老年期痴呆患者BPSD的疗效相当,齐拉西酮的优势在于对情感障碍和焦虑的疗效更加明显,锥体外系不良反应轻。     

Psychometric evaluation of the Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory in an acute general hospital setting

Objectives

The Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI; (Cohen‐Mansfield and Kerin, 1986)) is a well‐known tool for assessing agitated behaviours in people with dementia who reside in long‐term care. No studies have evaluated the psychometric qualities and factor structure of the CMAI in acute general hospitals, a setting where people with demand may become agitated.

Method

Longitudinal study investigating pain, agitation and behavioural problems in 230 people with dementia admitted to acute general hospitals in 2011–2012. Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory was completed as part of a battery of assessments including PAINAD to measure pain.

Results

A nine‐item two‐factor model of aggressive and nonaggressive behaviours proved to be the best‐fitting measurement model in this sample, (χ² = 96.3, df = 26, p<0.001; BIC [Bayesian Information Criterion] = 4593.06, CFI [Comparative Fit Index] = 0.884, TLI [Tucker Lewis Index] = 0.839, RMSEA [Root Mean Square Error of the Approximation] = 0.108). Although similar to the original factor structure, the new model resulted in the elimination of item 13 (screaming). Validity was confirmed with the shortened CMAI showing similar associations with pain as the original version of the CMAI, in particular the link between aggressive behaviours and pain.

Conclusion

The factor structure of the CMAI was broadly consistent with the original solution although a large number of items were removed. Scales reflecting physical and verbal aggression were combined to form an Aggressive factor, and physical and verbal nonaggressive behaviours were combined to form the Nonaggressive factor. A shorter, more concise version of the CMAI was developed for use in acute general hospital settings. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Efficacy and Safety of Brexpiprazole for the Treatment of Agitation in Alzheimer's Dementia: Two 12-Week,Randomized, Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Trials

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole in patients with agitation in Alzheimer's dementia (AAD).DesignTwo 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm studies (NCT01862640; NCT01922258).SettingStudy 1: 81 sites in 7 countries. Study 2: 62 sites in 9 countries.ParticipantsPatients with AAD (Study 1: 433 randomized; Study 2: 270 randomized) in a care facility or community-based setting. Stable Alzheimer disease medications were permitted.InterventionStudy 1 (fixed dose): brexpiprazole 2 mg/day, brexpiprazole 1 mg/day, or placebo (1:1:1) for 12 weeks. Study 2 (flexible dose): brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day or placebo (1:1) for 12 weeks.MeasurementsCohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) (Total score range: 29–203; higher scores indicate more frequent agitated behaviors), and Clinical Global Impression – Severity of illness (CGI-S) as related to agitation. Safety was also assessed.ResultsIn Study 1, brexpiprazole 2 mg/day demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement in CMAI Total score from baseline to Week 12 than placebo (adjusted mean difference, −3.77; confidence limits, –7.38, –0.17; t₍₃₁₆₎ = –2.06; p = 0.040; MMRM). Brexpiprazole 1 mg/day did not show meaningful separation from placebo (0.23; −3.40, 3.86; t₍₃₁₄₎ = 0.12; p = 0.90; MMRM). In Study 2, brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day did not achieve statistical superiority over placebo (–2.34; –5.49, 0.82; t₍₂₃₀₎ = −1.46; p = 0.15; MMRM). However, a benefit was observed in post hoc analyses among patients titrated to the maximum brexpiprazole dose of 2 mg/day compared with similarly titrated placebo patients (−5.06; −8.99, −1.13; t₍₁₄₄₎ = −2.54; p = 0.012; MMRM). On the CGI-S, a greater numerical improvement than placebo was demonstrated for brexpiprazole 2 mg/day in Study 1 (−0.16; −0.39, 0.06; t₍₃₃₇₎ = −1.42; nominal p = 0.16; MMRM), and a greater improvement for brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day in Study 2 (−0.31; −0.55, −0.06; t₍₂₂₂₎ = −2.42; nominal p = 0.016; MMRM). In Study 1, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with incidence ≥5% among patients receiving brexpiprazole 2 mg/day were headache (9.3% versus 8.1% with placebo), insomnia (5.7% versus 4.4%), dizziness (5.7% versus 3.0%), and urinary tract infection (5.0% versus 1.5%). In Study 2, TEAEs with incidence ≥5% among patients receiving brexpiprazole 0.5–2 mg/day were headache (7.6% versus 12.4% with placebo) and somnolence (6.1% versus 3.6%). In both studies, the majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity.ConclusionsBrexpiprazole 2 mg/day has the potential to be efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in the treatment of AAD.     

Safety and efficacy of long-acting risperidone in schizophrenia: a 12-week, multicenter, open-label study in stable patients switched from typical and atypical oral antipsychotics

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of the first long-acting injectable atypical antipsychotic, risperidone, were assessed in stable patients with schizophrenia switched from oral antipsychotic medications. METHOD: Data were collected between July 1, 2001, and October 25, 2002. The study population included patients from clinics, hospitals, and physicians' offices. After a 4-week run-in period, symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia (DSM-IV) who had been taking haloperidol (N = 46), quetiapine (N = 45), or olanzapine (N = 50) received 25 mg of long-acting risperidone. The oral antipsychotics were continued for 3 weeks after the first injection of long-acting risperidone. Injections were administered every 2 weeks at 25 mg up to a maximum dose of 50 mg for 12 weeks in this multicenter, open-label study. RESULTS: Long-acting risperidone was well tolerated. Of the 141 patients who participated in the study, the most frequently reported adverse events were insomnia (16%), headache (15%), psychosis (11%), and agitation (11%). The mean increase in body weight was 0.4 kg. No other clinically relevant laboratory abnormalities or significant electrocardiogram changes were observed during the 12-week treatment. Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale total scores were reduced during treatment with long-acting risperidone. Improvements in symptoms of schizophrenia were observed with long-acting risperidone at week 4 and continued through the 12-week treatment with significant reductions in total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores at week 8 (-2.5, p <.01) and week 12 (-3.9, p <.001). At endpoint, 37% (50/135) of these stable patients were rated as clinically improved (> or = 20% decrease in PANSS total scores). CONCLUSIONS: Switching treatment from oral antipsychotics to long-acting risperidone without an intervening period of oral risperidone was safe and well tolerated. Long-acting risperidone also significantly reduced the severity of symptoms in these stable patients with schizophrenia.