Effects of feeding and social factors on diarrhoea and vomiting in infants.

In a prospective study of infants and their feeding in south east Queensland, Australia, the incidences of reported diarrhoea and/or vomiting in breast, bottle, and mixed (breast and bottle) fed infants were compared from birth to 1 year. Up to 6 months infants who were given breast feeds, with or without other milks, had less diarrhoea and/or vomiting than those given bottle feeds only. Breast feeding seemed to protect the infant against possible introduced infections even when other milks were given along with the breast milk. After 6 months breast feeding did not reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal infection. In both upper and lower social class families infants given solids before 3 months had less diarrhoea and/or vomiting than those given solids later. Bottle fed infants aged 3-6 months in upper social class families had fewer gastrointestinal problems than those of lower social class families. This study suggests that up to the age of 6 months, in this population, breast feeding protects the infant against diarrhoea and/or vomiting, but other milks and solids can safely be given to supplement the breast milk. Breast feeding conferred no significant protection after 6 months.     

Prelacteal infant feeding practices in rural Egypt.

Data collected during a prospective cohort study of infant feeding and health in rural Bilbeis, Egypt, were analysed to define prelacteal infant feeding practices, identify their determinants, and assess whether these practices were predictive of breastfeeding and supplementation patterns and diarrhoea incidence during infancy. Sixty per cent (89/149) of study infants were prelacteally fed sugar-water, teas, or both. Lack of milk in the mother's breast (74 per cent), and maternal exhaustion or illness following labour (29 per cent) were the two most commonly stated reasons for prelacteal feeding. After multivariate adjustment, significantly higher incidence of prelacteal feeding was associated with childbirth during the warmer months [odds ratio (OR): 2.4; 95 per cent confidence interval (CI): 1.1-5.1], birth attendants with modern training (OR: 5.5; 95 per cent CI: 1.7-17.5), and labour lasting > 8 hours (OR: 2.3; 95 per cent CI: 0.1-4.9). Prelacteally fed infants were significantly less likely to be exclusively breastfed in age periods 0-3, 4-7, and 8-11 weeks. Diarrhoea incidence was higher among prelacteally fed infants in age periods 0-11, 12-23, and 36-47 weeks. Indiscriminate practice of prelacteal feeding and early supplementation of breastfeeding need to be discouraged.     

Protective effect of exclusive breastfeeding and effectiveness of maternal vaccination in reducing pertussis-like illness

ObjectiveTo assess the protective effect of exclusive breastfeeding and the effectiveness of maternal vaccination in reducing pertussis-like illness.MethodThis was a case-control study conducted in sentinel hospitals for pertussis in Recife between July 2016 and July 2018. Cases included children aged under six months with symptoms compatible with pertussis (pertussis-like illness). Controls included children aged under six months, living in the metropolitan region of Recife with no diagnosis of pertussis-like illness and matched by the same hospital and birth date.ResultsSeventy-three cases and 194 controls were included. The diagnosis of pertussis-like illness was predominantly clinical (97,2%). Amongst the main symptoms, paroxysmal cough was observed in 95.89% of cases and vomiting in 53.4%. There were 29 hospitalized cases and no deaths. Out of the 73 cases, 47 were born to mothers vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy, and the mothers of 144 of the 194 controls had been vaccinated. The protective effect of breastfeeding was of 74% (95% CI;38%, 89%). Children younger than six months, who were exclusively breastfed and with mothers vaccinated against pertussis during pregnancy were 5 times less likely to develop pertussis-like illness, corresponding to a protection of 79% (95% CI;31%, 94%). The effectiveness of maternal vaccination against pertussis-like illness in children under six months was low (27%) and not statistically significant (CI 95%; −34% a 60%).ConclusionsExclusive breastfeeding protects children under six months from pertussis-like illness and may be enhanced when associated with maternal vaccination. These strategies should be encouraged because they also protect against pertussis-like illnesses.     

Down syndrome and breastfeeding

AIM: The aim of the study was to investigate the frequency of breastfeeding among children with Down syndrome. METHODS: The mothers of 560 children with Down syndrome attending four university hospitals in Italy were interviewed and the neonatal clinical records retrieved. Information was collected on the type of infant feeding and on why some mothers had not breastfed their children. Two groups of healthy children whose feeding habits had been previously investigated were recruited as control subjects (1601 and 714, respectively). A paediatrician in each hospital was interviewed about the neonatal admission policy of children with Down syndrome. RESULTS: Among the 560 Down children, 246 (44%) were admitted to the neonatal unit. Compared with the two control groups, children with Down syndrome were significantly more frequently bottle-fed (57% vs 15% and 24%, respectively, odds ratio 7.5, 95% CI 6.0-9.4 and 4.2, 95% CI 3.3-5.4. respectively). Only 30% of infants admitted to the neonatal unit were breastfed. The main reasons reported by the mothers for not having breastfed were infants' illness in infants who had been admitted to the neonatal unit and frustration or depression, perceived milk insufficiency and difficulty with suckling for those babies who had not been admitted to the unit. The paediatricians reported that the admission of a baby with Down syndrome to the neonatal unit could sometimes take place not for medical reasons, but for diagnostic work-up or for a more appropriate diagnosis and to maintain communication with the family. CONCLUSIONS: Down syndrome babies are less frequently breastfed compared with healthy children. Support in breastfeeding should become a relevant point of health supervision for children with Down syndrome.     

Breast-feeding and health in the 1980s: a global epidemiologic review

In view of the significant and articulate minority view among pediatricians that breast feeding is not "worth the bother" in developed countries, this review of the literature delves into the evidence from both developed and developing countries for the advantages of breastfeeding, both in infants and for long-term health. Infants in developed settings experience twice the hospitalization rate and more severe illness from lower respiratory tract infection, primarily respiratory syncytial virus. In developing countries the mortality risk is 4-fold. for otitis media, the relative risks were 3.3-4.3 for Finnish infants. Bacterial meningitis and/or bacteremia had a 4-fold risk for hospitalization in a Connecticut study, and a 3-fold relative risk in 2 developing country studies. Human milk was the best preventative for bacteremia and necrotizing enterocolitis in prematures in British neonatal units. A 20-fold reduction in neonatal deaths occurred in Philippine study of breastfeeding, especially in low birth weight babies. Diarrhea causes the most infant mortality in developing nations, where bottle-feeding raises rates 14-fold. In the U.S. estimated relative risks is 3.7 for diarrheal mortality. Sudden infant death is about 1/5 less common in U.S. breast fed babies than in bottle fed. There is evidence for better long-term health after breast feeding in disorders such as celiac disease, Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, malignant lymphoma, chronic liver disease, atopic dermatitis, and food allergies. The design of good studies of protection conferred by breast feeding, and the possible modes of action of breast milk are discussed.     

Infant feeding, solid foods and hospitalisation in the first 8 months after birth

Most infants in the UK start solids before the recommended age of 6 months. We assessed the independent effects of solids and breast feeding on the risk of hospitalisation for infection in term, singleton infants in the Millennium Cohort Study (n = 15,980). For both diarrhoea and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI), the monthly risk of hospitalisation was significantly lower in those receiving breast milk compared with those receiving formula. The monthly risk of hospitalisation was not significantly higher in those who had received solids compared with those not on solids (for diarrhoea, adjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.59; for LRTI, adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.70), and the risk did not vary significantly according to the age of starting solids.     

Implications of growth patterns of breast-fed infants for growth references

Among the principal tenets of pediatric nutrition is the expectation that meeting the requirements for essential nutrients by feeding either artificial formulae or human milk results in indistinguishable physiological outcomes. This expectation has not been met. Were this observation confined to functional outcomes related to constituents of human milk not found in formula (e.g. immunological components, hormones and very-long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids), differences between breast-fed and artificially fed infants would not be surprising. However, differences in growth between breast- and bottle-fed infants who live under favorable conditions were mostly unexpected. Bottle-fed infants demonstrate accelerated growth patterns compared to infants who are breast fed (1, 2). Similarly, differences between the growth of breast-fed infants and established growth references were not anticipated (2–4).     

Clinical manifestations of allergy related to breast and cows' milk feeding.

The frequency of allergic manifestations in the first year of life was studied. The prevalence of allergic signs affecting the skin and respiratory tract in infants who had been started on breast feeding was compared with the prevalence of such signs in infants started on cows'' milk formulae. The relationship of allergy to family history was investigated. Eczema and rhinitis were found to be present as often in the initially breast-fed group as in the initially cows'' milk-fed group. Bottle-fed infants developed asthma and bronchitis more often than their breast-fed counterparts. Infants of allergic parents exhibited more allergy than those from non-allergic families, and this difference was particularly pronounced for asthma or bronchitis. Breast feeding gave some protection against the development of respiratory tract allergies in infants of non-allergic parents. Among the infants with a positive family history of allergy, fewer with eczema or chronic rhinitis were found in the initially breast-fed group group but this did not achieve statistical significance.     

Breastfeeding and infant hospitalisation: analysis of the UK 2010 Infant Feeding Survey

To investigate the contributions of overall breastfeeding duration and exclusive breastfeeding in reducing the risk of hospitalisation for infectious causes, we analysed data from a three‐stage survey on infant feeding practices and health outcomes in over 10 000 UK women in 2010–2011. The main outcome measures were risk of overnight hospital admission in the first 8–10 months of infancy. A graded beneficial effect was found between longer duration of any breastfeeding and hospital admission for infectious causes and for respiratory tract infections, with a significantly lower risk in infants breastfed for at least 3 months compared with those never breastfed. The effects were stronger in the subgroup who was also exclusively breastfed. For example, among infants breastfed for 3–6 months, the reduction in risk for infectious causes for those who were also exclusively breastfed for at least 6 weeks was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.22–0.81) and for those not exclusively breastfed for 6 weeks 0.79 (95% CI: 0.49–1.26). Likewise, among infants breastfed for 6 months or more, the odds ratio for those who were also exclusively breastfed for at least 6 weeks was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.32–0.72) and for those not exclusively breastfed for 6 weeks 0.72 (95% CI: 0.48–1.08). The apparent protective effect of any breastfeeding for a long duration may in part be driven by a prolonged period of exclusive breastfeeding. Exclusive breastfeeding in the initial weeks after childbirth and continuing to breastfeed (either exclusively or partially) for at least 3 months, preferably 6 months, may reduce morbidity due to infectious illness in infants.     

Breast milk feeding in very low birthweight infants

ABSTRACT. The infant feeding practices of 77 very low birthweight (VLBW) survivors with birthweights under 1500 g were studied. 58 (75%) infants received fresh expressed breast milk (EBM) from their own mothers, of whom 42 were successfully breastfed at a medium postconceptual age of 36 weeks. Overall incidence of breastfeeding in the VLBW population was 44% at 3 months and 23% at 6 months. The postnatal ages at which breastfeeding stopped ranged from 2 months to 28 months (median 4 months). No significant differences in perinatal factors were found between the breast milk and milk formula groups. There were significantly more mothers in the breast milk group who were given advice and encouragement during their pregnancy on breastfeeding and who had planned in the antenatal period to breastfeed their infants. The most common reasons given for deciding against providing breast milk were related to extreme prematurity of the infant. Nursery weight gain of infants fed breast milk and milk formula were similar. Necrotizing enterocolitis occurred significantly less frequently in the breast milk group. The study suggested that the special attention and positve encouragement given to parents of VLBW infants had contributed to the successful establishment and continuation of a feeding regime utilizing fresh breast milk from the infant's own mother, which we believe has immunological, psychological and nutritional benefits in this high-risk infant population.     

Breast milk feeding rates of mothers of multiples compared to mothers of singletons.

OBJECTIVE: Over 3% of infants born annually in the United States are from a multiple gestation pregnancy, yet there is little data published about the feeding practices of their mothers. The objectives of this study were to determine and compare the rates of breast milk feeding of mothers of multiples and mothers of singletons. METHODS: Stratified random sampling (n = 686) on the basis of plurality of pregnancy and gestational age at delivery was performed on a 1999 birth certificate database in the greater Cincinnati area. We collected information about infant feeding during the first 6 months of life using a retrospective, self-administered questionnaire and phone interview from mothers of term singletons (TS), preterm singletons (PS), term multiples (TM), and preterm multiples (PM). Data were analyzed using chi-square and logistic or multiple regression. RESULTS: We obtained feeding information from 346 mothers (n = 81 TS, 80 PS, 90 TM, and 95 PM). By 3 days postpartum, PM provided breast milk less often than all other groups: TS = 69%, PS = 66%, TM = 73%, PM = 57% (P =.035). Among mothers who initiated breast milk feeding, the geometric mean duration of at least some breast milk feeding was significantly shorter for PM than for all other groups: TS = 23 weeks, PS = 19 weeks, TM = 24 weeks, and PM = 12 weeks (P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: Further evaluation of the potential causes for the lower breast milk feeding rates among PM is needed to develop effective intervention strategies and increase the number of preterm multiple gestation infants receiving breast milk.     

Effect of breast feeding on risk of coeliac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: Coeliac disease (CD) is a disorder that may depend on genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. Recent observational studies suggest that breast feeding may prevent the development of CD. AIM: To evaluate articles that compared effects of breast feeding on risk of CD. METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published between 1966 and June 2004 that examined the association between breast feeding and the development of CD. RESULTS: Six case-control studies met the inclusion criteria. With the exception of one small study, all the included studies found an association between increasing duration of breast feeding and decreased risk of developing CD. Meta-analysis showed that the risk of CD was significantly reduced in infants who were breast feeding at the time of gluten introduction (pooled odds ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59) compared with infants who were not breast feeding during this period. CONCLUSIONS: Breast feeding may offer protection against the development of CD. Breast feeding during the introduction of dietary gluten, and increasing duration of breast feeding were associated with reduced risk of developing CD. It is, however, not clear from the primary studies whether breast feeding delays the onset of symptoms or provides a permanent protection against the disease. Long term prospective cohort studies are required to investigate further the relation between breast feeding and CD.     

How protective is breast feeding against diarrhoeal disease in infants in 1990s England? A case-control study.

AIMS: To assess the effect of several measures of infant feeding on diarrhoeal disease, and whether these effects vary according to markers of social deprivation. METHODS: Case-control study of diarrhoeal disease cases presenting to 34 general practices in England. Controls were stratified on age group, area deprivation index for the practice, and whether or not the practice was in London. Data were available on 304 infants (167 cases and 137 controls). RESULTS: After adjustment for confounders, breast feeding was associated with significantly less diarrhoeal disease. Associations were striking even in infants aged > or = 6 months. They did not vary by social class, but were greater in those living in rented council accommodation and in more crowded households. The effect of receiving no breast milk was stronger in more deprived areas than in less deprived areas. The effect of not receiving exclusive breast milk was stronger in more deprived areas than in less deprived areas. In formula fed infants, there was significantly more diarrhoeal disease in those not sterilising bottles/teats with steam or chemicals. The protective effect of breast feeding did not persist beyond two months after breast feeding had stopped. CONCLUSIONS: Breast feeding protects against diarrhoeal disease in infants in England although the degree of protection may vary across infants and wear off after breast feeding cessation. Education about the benefits of breast feeding and the risks of inadequate sterilisation should be targeted at carers in deprived areas or households.     

Intake and growth of breast-fed and formula-fed infants in relation to the timing of introduction of complementary foods: the DARLING study

We examined if the timing of introduction of solid foods was related to growth, intake, morbidity, activity or motor development among infants either breast fed or formula fed until 12 months of age. Breast-fed infants given solids before 6 months of age (earlysol) consumed less breast milk at 6 and 9 months of age than those given solids 6 months (latesol); thus total energy intake did not differ between groups. Z scores for weight, length and weight-for-length at 1–18 months did not differ between groups. Latesol infants gained less weight from 6 to 9 months but not during any other interval. Neither activity level nor morbidity differed between groups, but several developmental milestones occurred earlier in the earlysol versus the latesol group, probably due to reverse causation. Among formula-fed infants, timing of introduction of solid foods was not related to intake, growth, activity or morbidity. We conclude that solid foods given before 6 months of age generally replace the milk source among breast-fed but not formula-fed infants.     

PROPHYLAXIS OF ATOPIC DISEASE BY SIX MONTHS' TOTAL SOLID FOOD ELIMINATION

ABSTRACT. One hundred and thirty-five infants of atopic parents were exclusively breast-fed for 6 months without any cow's milk based supplements. Of these infants 70 received no nourishment except breast milk during the 6 months, and 65 were started on solid foods at the age of 3 months. The diet of all the infants was similar during 6 to 12 months of age. The children were examined at the age of one year. In the exclusive breast milk group atopic eczema and food allergy were less frequent than in the solid food group. The results suggest that total solid food elimination for the first 6 months of life, in addition to exclusive breast milk feeding, is prophylactic for atopic disease in children who are at hereditary risk.     

METABOLIC AND ENDOCRINE RESPONSES TO A MILK FEED IN SIX-DAY-OLD TERM INFANTS: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN BREAST AND COW'S MILK FORMULA FEEDING

ABSTRACT. Lucas, A., Boyes, S., Aynsley-Green, A. (Department of Paediatrics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford) and Bloom, S. R. (Hammersmith Hospital, London, England). Metabolic and endocrine responses to a milk feed in six-day-old term infants: JMfferences between breast and cow's milk formula feeding. Acta Paediatr Scand, 70:195, 1981. – There is little information on the metabolic and endocrine responses to milk feeding in the neonatal period particularly in relation to the mode of nutrition and composition of the milk. Plasma concentrations of insulin, glucagon and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) together with blood levels of glucose, ketone bodies, pyruvate, lactate and glycerol were measured pre- and post-prandially in 79 healthy six-day-old term infants who had been either breast fed or fed on a modified cow's milk formula (Cow and Gate Premium) from birth. Formula fed infants had a greater insulin and GIP response to feeding and their basal and postprandial blood ketones were considerably lower than in breast fed infants. In addition a significantly greater post feed rise in both lactate and pyruvate concentrations was observed with formula feeding. These results may have significant implications regarding infant feeding and postnatal metabolism.     

Type of milk feeding during acute diarrhoea and the risk of persistent diarrhoea: a case control study

The role of feeding breast milk, unmodified bovine milk or adapted infant formula during acute diarrhoea in protecting against or causing persistence of the episodes was investigated in a population-based case control study in an urban area of north India. After adjustment for confounding variables, exclusive breast-feeding was associated with an odds ratio of 0.06 (95% CI 0.002-2.1), a 16.5 times lower odds in favour of developing persistence of an episode. Infants fed unmodified bovine milk in addition to breast milk had an odds of 2.5 times (95% CI 1.0-9.9) in favour of developing persistence of acute diarrhoea ( p = 0.04). In infants receiving unmodified bovine milk and no breast milk, this odds ratio was 11.1 (95% CI 1.0-228.8) ( p = 0.05). This study indicates that promoting exclusive breastfeeding may reduce the persistence of diarrhoea over and above its effect in decreasing the incidence of acute diarrhoea. In urban areas of the developing countries where working mothers often use milk supplementation beyond the age of three months, our findings suggest that use of adapted spray dried formula may be safer than unmodified bovine milk with respect to the risk of developing persistent diarrhoea.     

How protective is breast feeding against diarrhoeal disease in infants in 1990s England? A case‐control study

Aims

To assess the effect of several measures of infant feeding on diarrhoeal disease, and whether these effects vary according to markers of social deprivation.

Methods

Case‐control study of diarrhoeal disease cases presenting to 34 general practices in England. Controls were stratified on age group, area deprivation index for the practice, and whether or not the practice was in London. Data were available on 304 infants (167 cases and 137 controls).

Results

After adjustment for confounders, breast feeding was associated with significantly less diarrhoeal disease. Associations were striking even in infants aged ⩾ 6 months. They did not vary by social class, but were greater in those living in rented council accommodation and in more crowded households. The effect of receiving no breast milk was stronger in more deprived areas than in less deprived areas. The effect of not receiving exclusive breast milk was stronger in more deprived areas than in less deprived areas. In formula fed infants, there was significantly more diarrhoeal disease in those not sterilising bottles/teats with steam or chemicals. The protective effect of breast feeding did not persist beyond two months after breast feeding had stopped.

Conclusions

Breast feeding protects against diarrhoeal disease in infants in England although the degree of protection may vary across infants and wear off after breast feeding cessation. Education about the benefits of breast feeding and the risks of inadequate sterilisation should be targeted at carers in deprived areas or households.     

Effect of exclusive breast‐feeding and early solid food avoidance on the incidence of atopic dermatitis in high‐risk infants at 1 year of age

The aim of this study was to assess the preventive effect of exclusive breast‐feeding and early solid food avoidance on atopic dermatitis (AD) in infancy. This study is part of a dietary clinical trial in a prospective cohort of healthy term newborns at risk of atopy. It was recommended to breast‐feed for at least 4 months and to avoid solid food in the same time‐period. Eight hundred and sixty‐five infants exclusively breast‐fed, and 256 infants partially or exclusively formula‐fed, were followed‐up until the end of the first year following birth. AD and sensitization to milk and egg were considered as study end‐points. The 1‐year incidence of AD was compared between the two study groups. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by multiple logistic regression. The incidence of AD was calculated in relation to age at introduction of solid food and amount of food given. In the breast‐fed group, the adjusted OR for AD was 0.47 (95% CI 0.30–0.74). The strongest risk factor was the occurrence of AD in the subject's core family. The risk of infants with AD to be sensitized to milk was four times higher, and to egg eight times higher, than in infants without AD. Age at first introduction of solid food and diversity of solid food showed no effect on AD incidence. We conclude that in infants at atopic risk, exclusive breast‐feeding for at least 4 months is effective in preventing AD in the first year of life.     

Effects of Breastfeeding,Formula Feeding,and Complementary Feeding on Rapid Weight Gain in the First Year of Life

ObjectiveTo determine whether proportion of breast versus formula feeding and timing of complementary food introduction affect the odds of rapid gain in weight status in a diverse sample of infants.MethodsUsing data from Greenlight Intervention Study, we analyzed the effects of type of milk feeding (breastfeeding, formula, or mixed feeding) from the 2- to 6-month well visits, and the introduction of complementary foods before 4 months on rapid increase in weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) and weight-for-length z-score (WLZ) before 12 months using multivariable logistic regression models.ResultsOf the 865 infants enrolled, 469 had complete data on all variables of interest, and 41% and 33% of those infants had rapid increases in WAZ and WLZ, respectively. Odds of rapid increase in WAZ remained lowest for infants breastfeeding from 2 to 6 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17, 0.69) when compared to infants who were formula-fed. Adjusted for feeding, introduction of complementary foods after 4 months was associated with decreased odds of rapid increase in WLZ (aOR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.96).ConclusionsFeeding typified by predominant breastfeeding and delaying introduction of complementary foods after 4 months reduces the odds of rapid increases in WAZ and WLZ in the first year of life.