Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Subcutaneous Pasireotide and Intramuscular Pasireotide Long-acting Release in Chinese Male Healthy Volunteers: A Phase I,Single-center,Open-label,Randomized Study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and safety of single and multiple doses of subcutaneous (SC) pasireotide and a single-dose intramuscular (IM) long-acting release (LAR) formulation of pasireotide in Chinese healthy volunteers (HVs) versus the PK properties in Western HVs (pooled from previous PK studies).

Methods

In this phase I, single-center, open-label study, 45 Chinese male HVs were evenly randomized to 1 to 9 treatment sequences: each volunteer received a single dose of 300, 600, or 900 μg of pasireotide SC on day 1, followed by administration of the same dose BID from day 15 to the morning of day 19, and then a single IM dose of 20, 40, or 60 mg of pasireotide LAR on day 33. The PK parameters were assessed with noncompartmental analysis. Statistical comparison of PK parameters, including AUC, C_max, and CL/F from both formulations, was made for Chinese versus Western male HVs. The safety profile was also assessed. Metabolic parameters, including blood glucose, insulin, and glucagon, and measures that reflect the effects of pasireotide LAR on relatively long-term glucose control, lipid metabolism, and systemic concentrations of pancreatic enzymes and thyrotropin were evaluated.

Findings

Of the 45 randomized HVs, 42 completed the study per protocol, 1 withdrew his informed consent for personal reasons, and 2 prematurely discontinued the study because of adverse events (AEs). Concentration-time and safety profiles of both formulations were similar to those reported in Western HVs. Mean geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Chinese versus Western HVs ranged from 0.79 to 1.42. For most primary PK parameters, 90% CIs for GMRs were within a predefined ethnic insensitivity interval (90% CI, 0.70–1.43). After considering age and weight as covariates in the statistical model, the GMRs and 90% CIs for other PK parameters were within the predefined interval (C_max in single-dose SC administration) or significantly decreased (C_min,ss in multiple BID SC doses and first peak C_max in the single-dose LAR formulation). No serious AEs were reported. Both formulations were well tolerated; pasireotide SC caused transient changes in glucose metabolism. Owing to the differential binding affinity to the somatostatin receptor subtypes, pasireotide LAR elicited a concentration-dependent increase of fasting blood glucose, substantial reduction in triglyceride, and a mild decrease in cholesterol. The most frequently reported AEs after single-dose and multiple-dose pasireotide SC were injection site reaction, nausea, dizziness, and diarrhea; most HVs developed diarrhea with single-dose pasireotide LAR.

Implications

The pasireotide formulations had similar PK and safety profiles between Chinese and Western male HVs. Thus, no ethnic sensitivity was found for pasireotide SC or LAR.     

Comparative Fasting Bioavailability of 2 Bepotastine Formulations in Healthy Male Chinese Volunteers: An Open-Label,Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Way Crossover Study

Background

Bepotastine is a second-generation histamine₁ receptor antagonist that is used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, urticaria, and pruritus associated with skin disease. A new generic formulation of bepotastine has been developed in China, and information concerning bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties in the Chinese population has not been reported.

Objective

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of 2 tablet formulations of bepotastine, the 10-mg generic formulation (test) and a branded formulation (reference), in healthy male Chinese volunteers to obtain registration approval of the test formulation.

Methods

A single-center, open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study with a 1-week washout period was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers. Blood samples were collected for 16 hours after a single dose of the 10-mg bepotastine test formulation or the reference formulation. Plasma bepotastine concentrations were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. C_max, T_max, AUC_0–t, AUC_0–∞, and t_½ were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the log-transformed C_max and AUC values were within the predetermined interval of 75% to 133% and 80% to 125%, respectively, according to the guidelines of the China Food and Drug Administration.

Results

No significant differences were found in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including C_max (74.81 [9.91] ng/mL vs 78.60 [29.58] ng/mL), AUC_0–t (295.55[115.29] ng·h/mL vs 299.17[109.29] ng·h/mL), and AUC_0-∞ (305.28 [118.50] ng·h/mL vs 310.90 [112.20] ng·h/mL). The mean (SD) t_½ values of the test and reference formulations were 2.53 (0.50) hours and 2.62 (0.41) hours, respectively. The 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for the logarithmic transformed values of C_max, AUC_0–t, and AUC_0–∞ were 86.96% to 101.80%, 93.22% to 104.13%, and 92.66% to 103.30%, respectively. All values were within the predetermined bioequivalence range. Two adverse events were reported as neutropenia (1 volunteer [4.2%]) and neutrophilia (1 volunteer [4.2%]). Both adverse events were transient and considered mild by physicians.

Conclusion

The test and reference tablets met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence as defined by the China Food and Drug Administration. Both formulations were well tolerated. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ChiCTR-TTRCC-13003723.     

Bioequivalence of 2 Azithromycin Capsule Formulations: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Open-Label, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Male Pakistani Volunteers

Background

Approximately 68 brands of azithromycin capsule formulations are available in Pakistan; however, published data on their bioequivalence in the Pakistani population are not available.

Objective

Upon instructions from and approval of the Ministry of Health, Pakistan, this study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of a locally manufactured azithromycin capsule formulation with a reference formulation from a multinational manufacturer. This study compared dissolution profiles, relative bioavailability, and other pharmacokinetic parameters of the 2 formulations.

Methods

A single oral 500-mg dose of the 2 formulations was administered to 12 healthy adult Pakistani male volunteers under fasting conditions in a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study. The trial included collection of blood samples over 48 hours and a 2-week washout period. Azithromycin serum concentrations were quantified using a validated RP-HPLC/ultraviolet (UV) detection method. These results were used to determine the intended pharmacokinetic parameters. As mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, the test and reference formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the log-transformed values of their pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predetermined range of 0.8 to 1.25.

Results

When subjected to a simple model independent approach of dissolution profile comparison, f₁ (difference) and f₂ (similarity factor) were found to be 5.47 and 70.04, respectively. Similarly, the 2 azithromycin capsule formulations were well tolerated by all volunteers. Low %CV of the pharmacokinetic parameters at a sample size of 12 and significance level of 0.05 contributed to acceptable (>0.8) power of the test. The 90% CIs for the ratios of C_max, AUC_0–48, T_max, t_1/2, and mean residence time, respectively, were 0.83–0.93, 0.85–1.10, 0.86–1.08, 0.92–1.17, and 0.92–1.16.

Conclusion

This single-dose study found that test and reference formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these fasted, healthy male Pakistani volunteers.     

Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin/Olmesartan Fixed-Dose Combination: A Single-Dose,Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Subjects

Background

Rosuvastatin, a lipid-lowering agent, has been widely used with olmesartan, a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker, indicated for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of these 2 drugs was recently developed to enhance the dosing convenience and to increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetic profiles comparable to coadministration of each drug as individual tablets.

Objective

The goal of present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of single-dose administration of an FDC tablet containing rosuvastatin/olmesartan 20/40 mg (test formulation) with coadministration of a rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet and a olmesartan 40-mg tablet (reference formulation) in healthy Korean male volunteers, for the purpose of determining bioequivalence.

Methods

This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study enrolled subjects aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of ideal body weight. Each subject received a single dose of the test and reference formulations orally in a fasted state, with a 7-day washout period between the administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for rosuvastatin, its active metabolite (N-desmethyl rosuvastatin), and olmesartan. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Results

Among the 58 enrolled subjects, 54 completed the study. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: rosuvastatin: AUC_last, 85.60% to 97.40% and C_max, 83.16% to 98.21%; N-desmethyl rosuvastatin: AUC_last, 82.08% to 93.45% and C_max, 79.23% to 93.41%; and olmesartan: AUC_last, 97.69% to 105.69% and C_max, 100.35% to 109.42%. The most frequently noted AE was headache, occurring in 3 and 6 patients with the test and reference formulations, respectively. All of the AEs were expected, and there was no significant difference in the prevalences of AEs between the 2 formulations.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetic properties of the newly developed FDC tablet of rosuvastatin/olmesartan 20/40 mg suggest that it is bioequivalent to co-administration of each drug as individual tablets in these healthy Korean male subjects. The two formulations were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01823900.     

The Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel Compared With the Concurrent Administration of Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized,Open-Label, 2-Sequence, 2-Period,Single-Dose Crossover Study

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is used for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. A combined formulation of ASA and clopidogrel has been developed to provide dosing convenience and improve adherence.

Objective

This study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetic properties and safety profile of a fixed-dose combination formulation of ASA and clopidogrel with concurrent administration of each agent in healthy male Korean volunteers.

Methods

This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 64 healthy Korean volunteers. Equal numbers of eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive either the fixed-dose combination of ASA 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg or the free combination of each agent followed by a 7-day washout period and then administration of the alternate formulation. Serial blood samples were collected immediately before and after dosing for 24 hours. The safety profile was evaluated by using adverse events (AEs), which were assessed by physical examination, vital signs, ECGs, clinical laboratory tests, and interviews. The 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the log-transformed C_max and AUC_0–last values were within the predetermined range of 0.8 to 1.25.

Results

Sixty-four volunteers (mean [SD] age, 27.51 [8.15] years; weight, 68.55 [7.86] kg; height, 173.80 [5.94] cm) were enrolled, and 63 completed the study. For ASA, the 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of C_max and AUC_0–last were 0.9483 to 1.1717 and 0.9946 to 1.1020, respectively. For salicylic acid, the 90% CIs were 0.9614 to 1.0396 for C_max and 0.9778 to 1.0163 for AUC_0–last. For clopidogrel, the 90% CIs were 0.9809 to 1.2562 for C_max and 0.9674 to 1.2073 for AUC_0–last. Six of the 20 AEs reported were drug related: decreased hemoglobin levels (n = 2), fever (n = 1), and headache (n = 1) with the test formulation and increased alanine aminotransferase levels (n = 1) and dyspepsia (n = 1) with the reference formulation. All of the drug-related AEs were transient and mild in severity.

Conclusions

The fixed-dose combination of ASA and clopidogrel 100 mg/75 mg did not meet the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence as defined by the Korea Food and Drug Administration. Both formulations were well tolerated in these healthy male Korean subjects. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01448330     

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Profile of Ivabradine in Healthy Chinese Men: A Phase I,Randomized, Open-Label,Increasing Single- and Multiple-Dose Study

Background

Ivabradine is a pure heart rate–lowering agent that acts by inhibiting I(f), an important ionic current involved in pacemaker activity in the cells of the sinoatrial node. In the 2012 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on Heart Failure, it was recommended that patients with a persistently high heart rate, despite treatment with an evidence-based dose of a β-blocker, should be considered for treatment with ivabradine.

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and safety profile of ivabradine in healthy Chinese men.

Methods

This Phase I, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, single- and multiple-dose study was conducted at the Clinical Pharmacology Center of the Cardiovascular Institute and Fu Wai Hospital at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College in Beijing, People’s Republic of China. Healthy, nonsmoking volunteers were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups based on treatment with 5, 10 or 20 mg of ivabradine. After a single dose, the subjects assigned to the 3 dose groups received repeated oral doses of ivabradine BID for 6 days. The plasma concentrations of ivabradine were determined by using a HPLC-MS/MS method. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate measurements were taken, and ECG and Holter monitoring was performed. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study by physical and ophthalmologic examinations, vital signs measurement, laboratory analyses, and monitoring of adverse effects.

Results

A total of 36 healthy Chinese men were enrolled in the study. After the single dose, plasma ivabradine C_max and AUC increased approximately linearly with dosage, no statistically significant differences were found in t_½ or T_max between the dose groups. After multiple doses, there was no significant change in T_max compared with the results after a single dose. After repeated doses, t_½, C_max, and AUC increased significantly (P < 0.001). After a single dose, a significant reduction in heart rate at 2 hours’ postdose was observed in the highest dose group, whereas after repeated doses, a significant reduction in heart rate was observed from 2 to 4 hours’ postdose for all 3 groups. The mean (SD) heart rate after repeated doses decreased 12.5 (4.8), 12.4 (6.9), and 20.5 (5.8) beats/min for the 5-, 10-, and 20-mg dose groups, respectively. No clear trend in the changes in QTc, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, or respiration rate was observed. Ivabradine was well tolerated in these healthy Chinese men.

Conclusions

The results of the study in a small population of healthy Chinese men suggest that the PK properties of ivabradine are linear with respect to dosing. After single and repeated oral administration of ivabradine, a significant decrease in heart rate was observed. Ivabradine appeared well tolerated in the population studied. Trial identifier: ACTRN1261300027741.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Eperisone Hydrochloride and Aceclofenac: A Randomized,Open-Label,Crossover Study of Healthy Korean Men

Background

Eperisone hydrochloride, a centrally acting muscle relaxant, is a calcium antagonist that causes vasodilation and antispastic actions. Aceclofenac, an anti-inflammatory analgesic and antipyretic drug, has similar efficacy and improved gastrointestinal tolerance compared with other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as diclofenac. Although eperisone hydrochloride and aceclofenac are frequently coadministered, no published studies have reported on the pharmacokinetic interactions between these 2 drugs.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate any pharmacokinetic interactions between eperisone hydrochloride and aceclofenac in healthy Korean men.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Each participant was randomly assigned to 1 of 6 treatment sequences and received eperisone hydrochloride (3 doses of 50 mg each), aceclofenac (2 doses of 100 mg each), or both as a single dose with a 7-day washout period between each dose. Blood samples were collected ≤24 hours after dosing, and plasma eperisone hydrochloride and aceclofenac concentrations were determined using validated LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted using noncompartmental methods. A safety profile was determined using the measurement of vital signs, ECG, and clinical laboratory tests.

Results

A total 24 of men were enrolled, and all completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of the C_max and AUC_0-∞ values for eperisone were 1.18 (0.828–1.673) and 1.12 (0.836–1.507), respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) of the C_max and AUC_0-∞ for aceclofenac were 0.93 (0.847–1.022) and 1.01 (0.979–1.036), respectively. A total of 7 adverse events were reported in 7 men. All adverse events were mild, and no significant differences were found between treatment groups.

Conclusion

No clinically significant pharmacokinetic differences exist between 150 mg eperisone hydrochloride and 200 mg aceclofenac when administrated as a monotherapy or in combination.     

Open-Label,Single-Dose,Parallel-Group Study in Healthy Volunteers To Determine the Drug-Drug Interaction Potential between KAE609 (Cipargamin) and Piperaquine

KAE609 represents a new class of potent, fast-acting, schizonticidal antimalarials. This study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of KAE609 in combination with the long-acting antimalarial piperaquine (PPQ) in healthy volunteers. A two-way pharmacokinetic interaction was hypothesized for KAE609 and PPQ, as both drugs are CYP3A4 substrates and inhibitors. The potential for both agents to affect the QT interval was also assessed. This was an open-label, parallel-group, single-dose study with healthy volunteers. Subjects were randomized to four parallel dosing arms with five cohorts (2:2:2:2:1), receiving 75 mg KAE609 plus 320 mg PPQ, 25 mg KAE609 plus 1,280 mg PPQ, 25 mg KAE609 alone, 320 mg PPQ alone, or 1,280 mg PPQ alone. Triplicate electrocardiograms were performed over the first 24 h after dosing, with single electrocardiograms at other time points. Routine safety (up to 89 days) and pharmacokinetic (up to 61 days) assessments were performed. Of the 110 subjects recruited, 99 completed the study. Coadministration of PPQ had no overall effect on exposure to KAE609, although 1,280 mg PPQ decreased the KAE609 maximum concentration (C_max) by 17%. The group that received 25 mg KAE609 plus 1,280 mg PPQ showed a 32% increase in the PPQ area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity (AUC_inf), while the group that received 75 mg KAE609 plus 320 mg PPQ showed a 14% reduction. Mean changes from baseline in the QT interval corrected by Fridericia''s method (QTcF) and the QT interval corrected by Bazett''s method (QTcB) with PPQ were consistent with its known effects. PPQ but not KAE609 exposure correlated with corrected QT interval (QTc) increases, and KAE609 did not affect the PPQ exposure-QTc relationship. The QTcF effect for PPQ (least-squares estimate of the difference in mean maximal changes from baseline of 7.47 ms [90% confidence interval, 3.55 to 11.4 ms]) was consistent with the criteria for a positive thorough QT study. No subject had QTcF or QTcB values of >500 ms. Both drugs given alone or in combination were well tolerated, with no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), or severe AEs reported. Most AEs were mild; upper respiratory tract infections, headache, diarrhea, and oropharyngeal pain were most common. PPQ and KAE609 coadministration had no relevant effect on exposure to either agent, and KAE609 did not affect or potentiate the known effects of PPQ on cardiac conduction.     

Pharmacokinetic Properties and Bioequivalence of 2 Formulations of Valsartan 160-mg Tablets: A Randomized,Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers

Background

The solubility of valsartan is dependent on pH and thus may cause patient variability in drug absorption and failure in bioequivalence studies; thus, increasing the solubility and release of valsartan at low pH has been suggested for a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. However, due to this pH dependence, the change in the formulation process could alter the disintegration and/or dissolution profile of the drug, possibly making the results of bioequivalence studies misleading.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the bioavailability and tolerability of a newly developed oral formulation of valsartan 160 mg (wet-granulation tablet) in healthy Korean male volunteers.

Method

This study was performed with the subjects under fasted conditions, using a randomized, single-dose, 2-period crossover design. Subjects were assigned to receive, in randomized order, a single dose of the test formulation and a reference formulation (valsartan 160-mg dry-granulation tablet), with a washout period of 7 days between the administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after the plasma valsartan concentration was analyzed using UPLC-MS/MS. The dissolution studies of both formulations were conducted using USP apparatus 2 at 50 rpm with 1000 mL of phosphate buffer solution (pH, 6.8) at 37°C ± 0.5°C. Bioequivalence was defined per Korean Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory criteria as 90% CIs of the geometric mean test/reference ratios of AUC_0–t and C_max within the range of 0.8 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination and subject interviews.

Results

Sixty subjects were enrolled (mean [SD] age [range], 23.6 [2.4] years [21–31]; height, 173.7 [6.6] cm [161–190]; and weight, 68.0 [8.7] kg [54–85]). The mean AUC_0–∞ values with the test and reference tablets were 31,784 (13,844) and 32,714 (14,512) ng·h/mL, respectively; C_max, 5094 (2061) and 5064 (1864) ng/mL; T_max, 2.92 (1.04) and 3.08 (1.01) hours. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean test/reference ratios of AUC_0–t and C_max were 0.9295 to 1.0546 and 0.9190 to 1.0848, respectively, which met the criteria for bioequivalence. The most frequently reported adverse event was dizziness after blank blood sampling, recorded in 4 subjects, 2 cases each with the test and reference formulations.

Conclusions

In this study in healthy Korean male volunteers, the test and reference formulations of 160-mg valsartan met the Korean Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory criteria for bioequivalence despite the difference in formulation (wet granulation vs dry granulation). Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported.     

Effects of a High-fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of the VEGFR Inhibitor Fruquintinib: A Randomized Phase I Study in Healthy Subjects

PurposeFruquintinib is a potent and highly selective oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and demonstrates promising activity against a broad spectrum of cancer types. The objective of the study was to investigate the tolerability and effect of high-fat food on the pharmacokinetic profile of a fruquintinib capsule in healthy Chinese subjects.MethodsHealthy Chinese male subjects aged between 18 and 45 years were enrolled in the study. The study included 2 phases: a dose-escalation phase and a food effect–assessment phase. In the dose-escalation phase, subjects were administered a single dose of fruquintinib (2, 3, or 4 mg) in the fasted state. In the food effect–assessment phase, subjects were administered a 4-mg fruquintinib capsule in the fasted and fed states, respectively, in 2 cycles. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at the designated time points. Tolerability was assessed throughout the study by physical examination including vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory tests, 12-lead ECG, clinical assessments, and monitoring for and spontaneous reporting of adverse events.FindingsTwenty-nine eligible male subjects were enrolled in the study, including 9 in the dose-escalation phase and 20 in the food effect–assessment phase. In the food effect–assessment phase, the ratios (90% CI) of the geometric mean AUC_0-∞ and C_max values for fruquintinib in the fed state to those observed in the fasted state were 97.2% (94.0%–100.4%) and 82.9% (76.7%–89.5%), respectively. The mean (SD) T_max values of fruquintinib were 3.0 (1.0) and 5.6 (4.5) hours in the fasted and fed states, respectively. The most common adverse events possibly related to the study drug were elevated blood uric acid, diarrhea, and decreased white blood cell count.ImplicationsThe overall bioavailability of the evaluated formulation of fruquintinib was not affected by the consumption of a high-fat, high-calorie meal prior to dosing. However, the consumption of a high-fat, high-calorie meal prior to dosing prolonged the T_max. These results indicate that the fruquintinib capsule can be administered with or without food. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01955304.     

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetic Properties,Bioavailability, and Tolerability of Two Lamivudine 100-mg Tablet Formulations: A Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

Background

Lamivudine is used in the treatment of HIV and chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections. Since 1999, at least 2 million Chinese HBV patients have been treated with lamivudine, but there are limited studies on the pharmacokinetics and safety of the drug in Chinese populations.

Objective

This study was designed to assess the bioequivalence of a newly developed lamivudine tablet (test drug) and a branded lamivudine tablet (reference drug) in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Methods

A single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the administration of oral lamivudine 100 mg in each period. Plasma lamivudine concentrations were analyzed by a validated LC–MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability parameters were calculated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

Results

There were no significant differences in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including C_max (1239 [328.9] ng/mL vs 1176 [341.5] ng/mL), AUC_0–t (4096 [599.1] ng · h/mL vs 4064 [678.2] ng · h/mL), and AUC_0–∞ (4200 [607.7] ng · h/mL vs 4162 [672.2] ng · h/mL). The geometric mean test/reference ratios (90% CI) calculated for the log-transformed parameters were C_max, 1.06 (96.21–116.90); AUC_0–t, 1.01 (96.53–105.39); and AUC_0–∞, 1.01 (96.81–105.16), all of which were within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. No serious AEs were reported, and all mild AEs were recovered quickly without treatment.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the test formulation of lamivudine 100 mg meets the FDA regulatory standards for bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated.     

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Enzalutamide in Healthy Chinese Male Volunteers

Purpose

This open-label, single-dose study evaluated the pharmacokinetic profiles of enzalutamide and its major metabolites and the safety of enzalutamide in healthy, Chinese male volunteers.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of 2 Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets of Amlodipine and Valsartan in Healthy Male Korean Volunteers: A Randomized,Open-Label, 2-Period,Single-Dose,Crossover Study

Background

Amlodipine and valsartan have different mechanisms of action, and it is known that the combination therapy with the 2 drugs increases treatment effects compared with the monotherapy with each drug. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug is a formulation including fixed amounts of active drug ingredients combined in a single dosage form that is expected to improve medication compliance.

Objective

The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of single administration of a newly developed FDC tablet containing amlodipine orotate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (test formulation) with the conventional FDC tablet of amlodipine besylate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (reference formulation) in healthy male Korean volunteers.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight. Each subject received a single dose of the reference and the test formulations, with a 14-day washout period between formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours after the dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for amlodipine and valsartan. Adverse events were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Results

Forty-eight of the 50 enrolled subjects completed the study. For both amlodipine and valsartan, the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence, yielding 90% CI ratios of 0.9277 to 0.9903 for AUC_0–last and 0.9357 to 1.0068 for C_max in amlodipine, and 0.9784 to 1.1817 for AUC_0–last and 0.9738 to 1.2145 for C_max in valsartan. Dizziness was the most frequently noted adverse event, occurring in 4 subjects with the test formulation, followed by oropharyngeal pain occurring in 1 subject with the test formulation and 3 subjects with the reference formulation. All other adverse events occurred in <3 subjects.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of the newly developed FDC tablet of amlodipine and valsartan did not differ significantly from the conventional FDC tablet in these healthy Korean male subjects. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01823913.     

Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of a Single Oral Dose of 500-mg Azithromycin Granules: A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Han Chinese Volunteers

Background: In recent years, the use of generic drugs has been increasing due to their effectiveness and to the increasing variety of drugs that are now available in generic formulations. Although several generic oral formulations of azithromycin are available in China, information concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Chinese population is unavailable.Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the bioequivalence and tolerability of a single oral dose of 2 commercial brands of 500-mg azithromycin granules in healthy Han Chinese volunteers.Methods: In a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study, the bioequivalence and tolerability of 2 commercial formulations of azithromycin granules (test: Dayin Ocean Biochemical Company Ltd., Shandong, China; reference: Taiyang Drug Company Ltd., Beijing, China) were compared in healthy adult Han Chinese volunteers. Both the test and the reference formulations were administered to each subject. The 2 treatment phases were separated by a 3-week washout period. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine plasma drug concentrations. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the natural log-transformed ratios of C_max and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 70% to 143% and 80% to 125%, respectively, and if P ≤ 0.05 for the 90% CIs.Results: Twenty-four male Han Chinese volunteers (mean [SD] age, 21.0 [2.0] years [range, 18-25 years]; mean [SD] weight, 67.6 [5.6] kg [range, 56-81 kg]; mean [SD] height, 176.0 [5.0] cm [range, 165-188 cm]) were enrolled. Twenty-two subjects completed the study, with 2 withdrawing for personal reasons. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of C_max, AUC from hour 0 to time t, and AUC from hour 0 to any time point were 85.9 to 103.9, 83.6 to 106.0, and 84.7 to 105.9 (in the 2 one-sided t tests; all, P < 0.05), respectively. Similar results were found in data without a logarithmic transformation. There were no significant differences in the plasma concentration-time curves of the test and reference formulations. No adverse events were reported by the subjects or revealed by clinical or laboratory tests.Conclusions: Single oral doses of 2 commercial brands of azithromycin granules (500 mg) were equivalent with regard to the rate and extent of absorption among these healthy Han Chinese volunteers. Both formulations were well tolerated.     

Pharmacokinetics of Single Doses of BI 425809 in Healthy Chinese and Japanese Subjects: A Randomized Study

PurposeThis study's primary goal was to evaluate the safety profile, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and dose proportionality of BI 425809, a potent and selective inhibitor of glycine transporter 1, in healthy Chinese and Japanese subjects.MethodsThis single center, double-blind, single-rising dose study conducted in Korea randomly assigned (3:1) subjects within each ethnic subgroup (Chinese and Japanese) to receive a single dose of BI 425809 (10, 25, or 50 mg) or placebo. The primary end point was number (%) of subjects with drug-related adverse events (AEs). Secondary end points included AUC, C_max, t_max, and t_½ for BI 425809 in plasma. The CL/F and volume of distribution (V_z/F) were also measured.FindingsOf the 49 subjects enrolled into the study (24 Chinese, 25 Japanese), 36 were randomly assigned to receive BI 425809 (12 per dose group) and 13 to receive placebo. All subjects were analyzed for the primary end point and completed the study. Overall, 4 of 49 subjects (8.2%) reported ≥1 AE (placebo: n = 1, BI 425809: n = 3). One drug-related AE of moderate somnolence was reported by a Japanese subject who received placebo. In both subgroups, slightly lower than dose-proportional increases in exposure (AUC and C_max) were observed with increasing dose. In addition, median t_max was 3.5–4.0 h, with a geometric mean t_½ of 29.0–41.2 h. CL/F was similar between Chinese and Japanese subjects and increased with increasing dose (10–50 mg: 68.1–111 mL/min). V_z/F was 209–315 L and similar between the subgroups.ImplicationsBI 425809 was generally well tolerated in healthy Chinese and Japanese subjects with no significant findings for tolerability. No apparent difference in the pharmacokinetic variables of BI 425809 was observed between Chinese and Japanese subjects. The safety profile results and pharmacokinetic exposure levels are consistent with previous trials in Caucasian subjects. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02383888.     

Short-term Safety,Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of MRX-I,an Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agent,in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of MRX-I tablet, an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent, in healthy Chinese subjects.

乳酸左氧氟沙星片剂的健康人体药代动力学和相对生物利用度研究

目的:研究乳酸左旋氧氟沙星片剂的健康人体药代动力学和相对生物利用度。方法:18名健康受试者单次,交叉口服乳酸左旋氧氟沙星片200 mg后,用HPLC-荧光法测定血浆中左氧氟沙星浓度,用BAPP2.0软件进行数据处理,计算药代动力学参数。结果:供试与参比制剂的药时曲线可用二室模型拟合,两者主要药代动力学参数Cmax分别为(2.92±0.60)μg/mL(、3.22±0.53)μg/mL;Tmax分别为(0.9±0.3)h(、0.9±0.3)h;t1/2分别为(7.27±1.02)h、(6.83±0.80)h;AUC0~24分别为(17.18±2.46)μg/(mL.h)(、17.19±2.55)μg/(mL.h),乳酸左氧氟沙星片供试制剂的相对生物利用度为(100.3±9.4)%。结论:供试与参比制剂具有生物等效性。     

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate 300 mg Once Daily: An Open-Label,Single- and Multiple-Dose Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Background

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has been approved worldwide for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis B and, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, HIV-1 infection. Although its use for the treatment of HIV has been approved by the Chinese State Food and Drug Administration, there are no data on the pharmacokinetic profile of TDF in Chinese individuals.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of TDF in healthy Chinese subjects.

Methods

This open-label, single- and multiple-dose study was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers. Subjects received TDF 300 mg once daily, administered as a single dose (day 1) and multiple doses (days 4–10). Multiple plasma samples were collected over time, and the concentrations of TDF were determined using LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a noncompartmental model. Tolerability was determined using clinical evaluation and monitoring of adverse events (AEs).

Results

Fourteen volunteers were enrolled (7 men, 7 women; mean age, 24.6 years). TDF was rapidly absorbed; median T_max was 0.75 hour, and t_½ was ~21 hours with single dosing. The mean ratio of AUC_0–τ steady state/AUC_0–24 single dose was 1.55. The pharmacokinetic properties of TDF were consistent between the single dose and multiple doses, and between men and women. No serious AEs were reported, and there were no discontinuations due to AEs.

Conclusions

There was an accumulation of approximately 55% in tenofovir exposure in healthy Chinese between multiple dose and single dose. TDF exhibited a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that of healthy Western subjects in a historical comparison. TDF was generally well tolerated in these healthy Chinese subjects. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01480622.     

Safety,Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Siponimod: A Randomized,Open-label Study in Healthy Subjects

PurposeThe goal of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous (IV) siponimod in healthy subjects.MethodsThis randomized, open-label study was conducted in 2 parts. In Part 1, a total of 16 eligible subjects received either a single oral dose of siponimod (0.25 mg) followed by a single IV infusion (0.25 mg/3 h) in Sequence 1, or vice versa in Sequence 2. In Part 2, a total of 17 eligible subjects received single IV infusions of siponimod (1 mg/24 h).FindingsNo clinically relevant effect on mean 5-minute or hourly average heart rate was observed following the siponimod IV dosing regimens and both remained above 50 beats/min. Observed atrioventricular blocks and sinus pauses were asymptomatic. The mean change in absolute lymphocyte count from baseline was comparable for the siponimod 0.25 mg oral regimen and the two IV siponimod regimens. Oral siponimod displayed a good absolute bioavailability of 84%. The mean peak exposure of oral siponimod was approximately 48% lower than that of IV siponimod. The M17 metabolite was found to be the most prominent systemic metabolite of siponimod in humans.ImplicationsSiponimod IV infusions were well tolerated, with safety and PD (absolute lymphocyte count) profiles similar to those of oral siponimod. The PD/PK findings supported the development of an innovative rapid IV titration regimen for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.