Bioequivalence of 2 Azithromycin Capsule Formulations: A Randomized, Single-Dose, Open-Label, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Male Pakistani Volunteers

Background

Approximately 68 brands of azithromycin capsule formulations are available in Pakistan; however, published data on their bioequivalence in the Pakistani population are not available.

Objective

Upon instructions from and approval of the Ministry of Health, Pakistan, this study was designed to evaluate the bioequivalence of a locally manufactured azithromycin capsule formulation with a reference formulation from a multinational manufacturer. This study compared dissolution profiles, relative bioavailability, and other pharmacokinetic parameters of the 2 formulations.

Methods

A single oral 500-mg dose of the 2 formulations was administered to 12 healthy adult Pakistani male volunteers under fasting conditions in a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study. The trial included collection of blood samples over 48 hours and a 2-week washout period. Azithromycin serum concentrations were quantified using a validated RP-HPLC/ultraviolet (UV) detection method. These results were used to determine the intended pharmacokinetic parameters. As mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicine Agency, the test and reference formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the log-transformed values of their pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predetermined range of 0.8 to 1.25.

Results

When subjected to a simple model independent approach of dissolution profile comparison, f₁ (difference) and f₂ (similarity factor) were found to be 5.47 and 70.04, respectively. Similarly, the 2 azithromycin capsule formulations were well tolerated by all volunteers. Low %CV of the pharmacokinetic parameters at a sample size of 12 and significance level of 0.05 contributed to acceptable (>0.8) power of the test. The 90% CIs for the ratios of C_max, AUC_0–48, T_max, t_1/2, and mean residence time, respectively, were 0.83–0.93, 0.85–1.10, 0.86–1.08, 0.92–1.17, and 0.92–1.16.

Conclusion

This single-dose study found that test and reference formulations met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence in these fasted, healthy male Pakistani volunteers.     

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetic Properties,Bioavailability, and Tolerability of Two Lamivudine 100-mg Tablet Formulations: A Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Male Subjects

Background

Lamivudine is used in the treatment of HIV and chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections. Since 1999, at least 2 million Chinese HBV patients have been treated with lamivudine, but there are limited studies on the pharmacokinetics and safety of the drug in Chinese populations.

Objective

This study was designed to assess the bioequivalence of a newly developed lamivudine tablet (test drug) and a branded lamivudine tablet (reference drug) in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Methods

A single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the administration of oral lamivudine 100 mg in each period. Plasma lamivudine concentrations were analyzed by a validated LC–MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability parameters were calculated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

Results

There were no significant differences in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including C_max (1239 [328.9] ng/mL vs 1176 [341.5] ng/mL), AUC_0–t (4096 [599.1] ng · h/mL vs 4064 [678.2] ng · h/mL), and AUC_0–∞ (4200 [607.7] ng · h/mL vs 4162 [672.2] ng · h/mL). The geometric mean test/reference ratios (90% CI) calculated for the log-transformed parameters were C_max, 1.06 (96.21–116.90); AUC_0–t, 1.01 (96.53–105.39); and AUC_0–∞, 1.01 (96.81–105.16), all of which were within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. No serious AEs were reported, and all mild AEs were recovered quickly without treatment.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the test formulation of lamivudine 100 mg meets the FDA regulatory standards for bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated.     

Single-Dose,Randomized Crossover Comparisons of Different-Strength Imatinib Mesylate Formulations in Healthy Korean Male Subjects

Background

Imatinib mesylate is used to treat chronic myeloid leukemia and advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics of 2 different strengths of the imatinib formulation containing 100 mg (reference) and 400 mg (test) to satisfy the regulatory requirement for marketing.

Methods

A single-center, randomized, single-dose, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence, comparative crossover study with a 14-day washout period was conducted in 30 healthy male volunteers. Plasma samples for the drug analysis were collected up to 72 hours after drug treatment. Participants received either the reference (4 tablets of 100-mg imatinib) or the test (1 tablet of 400-mg imatinib) formulation during the first period and the alternative formulation during the second period. The safety profiles and tolerability of the 2 formulations were also assessed based on physical examinations, laboratory tests, a 12-lead ECG, and vital signs.

Results

Thirty participants were initially enrolled; their mean (SD) age, height, weight, and body mass index were 24.9 (2.0) years (range, 23–30 years), 174 (5) cm (range, 164–185 cm), 69.9 (2.0) kg (range, 54.1–87.4 kg), and 23.0 (2.0) kg/m² (range, 18.5–26.9 kg/m²); 28 healthy participants completed both treatment periods. Two subjects did not complete the study because they withdrew consent for personal reasons. The observed mean (SD) C_max, AUC_0–last, and AUC_0–∞ values for the reference formulation were 1792 (357) ng/mL, 28,485 (6274) ng · h/mL, and 29,079 (6371) ng · h/mL, respectively. Corresponding values for the test formulation were 1710 (312) ng/mL, 27,222 (4624) ng · h/mL , and 27,872 (4751) ng · h/mL. The geometric mean ratios (90% CIs) between the 2 formulations at the 400-mg dose of imatinib were 0.9579 (0.9054–1.0136) for C_max, 0.9652 (0.9174–1.0155) for AUC_0–last, and 0.9679 (0.9203–1.0179) for AUC_0–∞, respectively. During the study period, 6 adverse events (3 for the reference and 3 for the test formulation) were reported; all were transient, mild, and resolved completely during the treatment period. There were 4 cases of nausea and 1 case each of dizziness and oropharyngeal pain. Four adverse events were considered related to the study drugs.

Conclusions

The results showed that despite the different strengths of the 2 imatinib formations, the test and reference formulations both met the regulatory criteria for pharmacokinetic equivalence at a dose of imatinib 400 mg in these healthy Korean male subjects. Both imatinib formulations seemed to be generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01270984.     

Pharmacokinetic Properties and Bioequivalence of 2 Formulations of Valsartan 160-mg Tablets: A Randomized,Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers

Background

The solubility of valsartan is dependent on pH and thus may cause patient variability in drug absorption and failure in bioequivalence studies; thus, increasing the solubility and release of valsartan at low pH has been suggested for a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. However, due to this pH dependence, the change in the formulation process could alter the disintegration and/or dissolution profile of the drug, possibly making the results of bioequivalence studies misleading.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the bioavailability and tolerability of a newly developed oral formulation of valsartan 160 mg (wet-granulation tablet) in healthy Korean male volunteers.

Method

This study was performed with the subjects under fasted conditions, using a randomized, single-dose, 2-period crossover design. Subjects were assigned to receive, in randomized order, a single dose of the test formulation and a reference formulation (valsartan 160-mg dry-granulation tablet), with a washout period of 7 days between the administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined after the plasma valsartan concentration was analyzed using UPLC-MS/MS. The dissolution studies of both formulations were conducted using USP apparatus 2 at 50 rpm with 1000 mL of phosphate buffer solution (pH, 6.8) at 37°C ± 0.5°C. Bioequivalence was defined per Korean Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory criteria as 90% CIs of the geometric mean test/reference ratios of AUC_0–t and C_max within the range of 0.8 to 1.25. Tolerability was assessed using physical examination and subject interviews.

Results

Sixty subjects were enrolled (mean [SD] age [range], 23.6 [2.4] years [21–31]; height, 173.7 [6.6] cm [161–190]; and weight, 68.0 [8.7] kg [54–85]). The mean AUC_0–∞ values with the test and reference tablets were 31,784 (13,844) and 32,714 (14,512) ng·h/mL, respectively; C_max, 5094 (2061) and 5064 (1864) ng/mL; T_max, 2.92 (1.04) and 3.08 (1.01) hours. The 90% CIs for the geometric mean test/reference ratios of AUC_0–t and C_max were 0.9295 to 1.0546 and 0.9190 to 1.0848, respectively, which met the criteria for bioequivalence. The most frequently reported adverse event was dizziness after blank blood sampling, recorded in 4 subjects, 2 cases each with the test and reference formulations.

Conclusions

In this study in healthy Korean male volunteers, the test and reference formulations of 160-mg valsartan met the Korean Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory criteria for bioequivalence despite the difference in formulation (wet granulation vs dry granulation). Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported.     

Comparative Bioavailability Study of Single-Dose Film-Coated and Sugar-Coated Ethionamide Tablets in Healthy Volunteers

Background

Ethionamide sugar-coated tablets have been reformulated to film-coated tablets to improve dissolution and stability.

Objective

The study objective was to compare the bioavailability of the film-coated (test) and sugar-coated (reference) formulations of ethionamide.

Methods

After providing informed consent and undergoing screening procedures, 40 healthy subjects were assigned to receive a single dose of ethionamide 250-mg film- or sugar-coated tablets, in randomized order, in the fasted state. Serial blood samples were collected before and from 0.5 to 24 hours after dosing. After a 7-day washout, procedures were repeated for the other formulation. The blood samples were processed to provide plasma samples, which were frozen until assay. Plasma ethionamide concentrations were measured using a validated LC-MS/MS method, with a lower limit of quantitation of 20 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods, with subsequent evaluation for bioequivalence.

Results

All 40 subjects (37 men, 3 women; mean age, 28 years; mean weight, 74 kg) completed the study. Seven subjects reported a total of 10 adverse events (5 with each formulation), all of which were mild and considered possibly related to drug treatment. None of the events resulted in discontinuation from the study. Mean (SD) pharmacokinetic properties observed with the film- and sugar-coated tablets, respectively, were as follows: C_max, 2160 (614) and 1484 (636) ng/mL; T_max, 1.0 (0.5) and 1.5 (0.9) hours; k_e, 0.369 (0.053) and 0.232 (0.114) h^–1; t_½, 1.92 (0.27) and 4.06 (2.52) hours; and AUC, 7668 (1688) and 6594 (1764) ng · h/mL.

Conclusions

Comparing AUC values, the formulations were bioequivalent. The maximum concentrations observed with the film-coated product were higher but were more consistent (%CV, 28%) compared with those of the sugar-coated formulation (%CV, 43%).     

Pharmacokinetics of Pilsicainide Hydrochloride for Injection in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Randomized,Parallel-Group,Open-Label,Single-Dose Study

Background

Pilsicainide hydrochloride is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent used for the treatment of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias and atrial fibrillation.

Objective

The objective of the present study was to determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a pilsicainide hydrochloride injection in healthy Chinese adults. The study was conducted to meet China State Food and Drug Administration requirements for the marketing of the new generic formulation of pilsicainide hydrochloride.

Methods

This Phase I, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, single-dose PK study was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers. Subjects were randomized to receive a single dose of 0.25-, 0.50-, and 0.75-mg/kg pilsicainide hydrochloride with a 10-minute intravenous infusion. Serial blood and urine samples were collected up to 24 hours after dosing; drug concentrations in plasma and urine were then determined by using LC-MS/MS. The PK parameters of pilsicainide were calculated from the plasma concentration–time data according to noncompartmental methods. Safety profile was evaluated by monitoring adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, and the results of 12-lead ECGs.

Results

Thirty healthy volunteers (mean [SD] age, 28.0 [4.95] years; weight, 59.3 [6.51] kg; height, 165.0 [7.25] cm; body mass index, 21.7 [1.94] kg/m²) were randomly divided into 3 groups, each consisting of 5 men and 5 women. After single-dose intravenous administration of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg/kg of pilsicainide hydrochloride, mean C_max was 0.34 (0.11), 0.54 (0.15), and 1.05 (0.19) μg/mL, respectively; AUC_0–24 was 0.76 (0.12), 1.61 (0.37), and 2.61 (0.46) h · μg/mL; and AUC_0–∞ was 0.79 (0.13), 1.71 (0.46), and 2.72 (0.50) h · μg/mL. The ranges for t_½z, CL, and V_z were 5.19 to 5.98 hours, 4.73 to 5.44 mL/min/kg, and 2.23 to 0.58 L/kg, respectively. The mean urinary recovery rate within 24 hours was 75.0% (12.0%), 65.0% (19.2%), and 66.4% (14.1%). Men and women had significantly different AUC_0–24 values in the 0.50-mg/kg dose group (P = 0.044), and V_z showed significant differences between men and women in all 3 dose groups (P = 0.001). According to ECG parameters, PR intervals were significantly prolonged after administration at all 3 doses (P = 0.034, P < 0.001, and P = 0.034); no significant changes were seen in QRS width, QTc interval, or other parameters.

Conclusions

Pilsicainide hydrochloride demonstrated linear PK, and the increase in the exposure of pilsicainide (AUC_0–24 and AUC_0–∞) was dose proportional after single doses of 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 mg/kg. All 3 pilsicainide hydrochloride doses were well tolerated in these Chinese volunteers. ChiCTR-ONC-13003546.     

Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of a Single Oral Dose of 500-mg Azithromycin Granules: A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Han Chinese Volunteers

Background: In recent years, the use of generic drugs has been increasing due to their effectiveness and to the increasing variety of drugs that are now available in generic formulations. Although several generic oral formulations of azithromycin are available in China, information concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Chinese population is unavailable.Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the bioequivalence and tolerability of a single oral dose of 2 commercial brands of 500-mg azithromycin granules in healthy Han Chinese volunteers.Methods: In a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study, the bioequivalence and tolerability of 2 commercial formulations of azithromycin granules (test: Dayin Ocean Biochemical Company Ltd., Shandong, China; reference: Taiyang Drug Company Ltd., Beijing, China) were compared in healthy adult Han Chinese volunteers. Both the test and the reference formulations were administered to each subject. The 2 treatment phases were separated by a 3-week washout period. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine plasma drug concentrations. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the natural log-transformed ratios of C_max and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 70% to 143% and 80% to 125%, respectively, and if P ≤ 0.05 for the 90% CIs.Results: Twenty-four male Han Chinese volunteers (mean [SD] age, 21.0 [2.0] years [range, 18-25 years]; mean [SD] weight, 67.6 [5.6] kg [range, 56-81 kg]; mean [SD] height, 176.0 [5.0] cm [range, 165-188 cm]) were enrolled. Twenty-two subjects completed the study, with 2 withdrawing for personal reasons. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of C_max, AUC from hour 0 to time t, and AUC from hour 0 to any time point were 85.9 to 103.9, 83.6 to 106.0, and 84.7 to 105.9 (in the 2 one-sided t tests; all, P < 0.05), respectively. Similar results were found in data without a logarithmic transformation. There were no significant differences in the plasma concentration-time curves of the test and reference formulations. No adverse events were reported by the subjects or revealed by clinical or laboratory tests.Conclusions: Single oral doses of 2 commercial brands of azithromycin granules (500 mg) were equivalent with regard to the rate and extent of absorption among these healthy Han Chinese volunteers. Both formulations were well tolerated.     

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate 300 mg Once Daily: An Open-Label,Single- and Multiple-Dose Study in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Background

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) has been approved worldwide for the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis B and, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, HIV-1 infection. Although its use for the treatment of HIV has been approved by the Chinese State Food and Drug Administration, there are no data on the pharmacokinetic profile of TDF in Chinese individuals.

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties and tolerability of TDF in healthy Chinese subjects.

Methods

This open-label, single- and multiple-dose study was conducted in healthy Chinese volunteers. Subjects received TDF 300 mg once daily, administered as a single dose (day 1) and multiple doses (days 4–10). Multiple plasma samples were collected over time, and the concentrations of TDF were determined using LC-MS/MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a noncompartmental model. Tolerability was determined using clinical evaluation and monitoring of adverse events (AEs).

Results

Fourteen volunteers were enrolled (7 men, 7 women; mean age, 24.6 years). TDF was rapidly absorbed; median T_max was 0.75 hour, and t_½ was ~21 hours with single dosing. The mean ratio of AUC_0–τ steady state/AUC_0–24 single dose was 1.55. The pharmacokinetic properties of TDF were consistent between the single dose and multiple doses, and between men and women. No serious AEs were reported, and there were no discontinuations due to AEs.

Conclusions

There was an accumulation of approximately 55% in tenofovir exposure in healthy Chinese between multiple dose and single dose. TDF exhibited a pharmacokinetic profile similar to that of healthy Western subjects in a historical comparison. TDF was generally well tolerated in these healthy Chinese subjects. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01480622.     

Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin/Olmesartan Fixed-Dose Combination: A Single-Dose,Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Subjects

Background

Rosuvastatin, a lipid-lowering agent, has been widely used with olmesartan, a long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker, indicated for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet of these 2 drugs was recently developed to enhance the dosing convenience and to increase patient compliance while yielding pharmacokinetic profiles comparable to coadministration of each drug as individual tablets.

Objective

The goal of present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of single-dose administration of an FDC tablet containing rosuvastatin/olmesartan 20/40 mg (test formulation) with coadministration of a rosuvastatin 20-mg tablet and a olmesartan 40-mg tablet (reference formulation) in healthy Korean male volunteers, for the purpose of determining bioequivalence.

Methods

This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study enrolled subjects aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of ideal body weight. Each subject received a single dose of the test and reference formulations orally in a fasted state, with a 7-day washout period between the administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after dosing, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for rosuvastatin, its active metabolite (N-desmethyl rosuvastatin), and olmesartan. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Results

Among the 58 enrolled subjects, 54 completed the study. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were as follows: rosuvastatin: AUC_last, 85.60% to 97.40% and C_max, 83.16% to 98.21%; N-desmethyl rosuvastatin: AUC_last, 82.08% to 93.45% and C_max, 79.23% to 93.41%; and olmesartan: AUC_last, 97.69% to 105.69% and C_max, 100.35% to 109.42%. The most frequently noted AE was headache, occurring in 3 and 6 patients with the test and reference formulations, respectively. All of the AEs were expected, and there was no significant difference in the prevalences of AEs between the 2 formulations.

Conclusions

The pharmacokinetic properties of the newly developed FDC tablet of rosuvastatin/olmesartan 20/40 mg suggest that it is bioequivalent to co-administration of each drug as individual tablets in these healthy Korean male subjects. The two formulations were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01823900.     

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of 2 Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets of Amlodipine and Valsartan in Healthy Male Korean Volunteers: A Randomized,Open-Label, 2-Period,Single-Dose,Crossover Study

Background

Amlodipine and valsartan have different mechanisms of action, and it is known that the combination therapy with the 2 drugs increases treatment effects compared with the monotherapy with each drug. A fixed-dose combination (FDC) drug is a formulation including fixed amounts of active drug ingredients combined in a single dosage form that is expected to improve medication compliance.

Objective

The goal of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of single administration of a newly developed FDC tablet containing amlodipine orotate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (test formulation) with the conventional FDC tablet of amlodipine besylate 10 mg and valsartan 160 mg (reference formulation) in healthy male Korean volunteers.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-way crossover study. Eligible subjects were between the ages of 20 and 50 years and within 20% of their ideal weight. Each subject received a single dose of the reference and the test formulations, with a 14-day washout period between formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 144 hours after the dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for amlodipine and valsartan. Adverse events were evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Results

Forty-eight of the 50 enrolled subjects completed the study. For both amlodipine and valsartan, the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were included in the range for assumed bioequivalence, yielding 90% CI ratios of 0.9277 to 0.9903 for AUC_0–last and 0.9357 to 1.0068 for C_max in amlodipine, and 0.9784 to 1.1817 for AUC_0–last and 0.9738 to 1.2145 for C_max in valsartan. Dizziness was the most frequently noted adverse event, occurring in 4 subjects with the test formulation, followed by oropharyngeal pain occurring in 1 subject with the test formulation and 3 subjects with the reference formulation. All other adverse events occurred in <3 subjects.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the pharmacokinetics of the newly developed FDC tablet of amlodipine and valsartan did not differ significantly from the conventional FDC tablet in these healthy Korean male subjects. Both formulations were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01823913.     

Relative Oral Bioavailability of an Abuse-deterrent,Extended-release Formulation of Morphine Versus Extended-release Morphine: A 2-period,Single-dose,Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects

Purpose

Morphine ARER is a novel oral, abuse-deterrent, extended-release (ER) formulation of morphine sulfate with physical and chemical properties that deter misuse and abuse by nonoral routes of administration. Here we evaluate the relative bioavailability of morphine ARER and extended-release morphine.

Comparative Bioavailability Study of a New Orodispersible Formulation of Ibuprofen Versus Two Existing Oral Tablet Formulations in Healthy Male and Female Volunteers

PurposeThis study aimed to assess the comparative bioavailability between ibuprofen acid orodispersible tablets (Test product) and ibuprofen acid oral tablets (Reference product).MethodsThis was a randomized, single-dose, 3-way crossover, open-label, pharmacokinetic study in 36 healthy male and female volunteers. Blood samples were taken periodically over a 12-h period after dosing to derive total plasma ibuprofen and S(+)/R(−) ibuprofen enantiomer pharmacokinetic parameters; safety profile and tolerability were evaluated throughout the study.FindingsAfter a single-dose administration of ibuprofen acid oral tablets (2 × 200 mg), the total ibuprofen C_max and AUC_0–t (geometric least square [LS] mean) for the Test product was 29.4 μg/mL and 100.6 h/μg/mL, respectively, and for the Reference product it was 30.6 μg/mL and 98.7 h/μg/mL. The geometric LS mean Test/Reference ratio 90% CI for both total ibuprofen C_max (90.71–101.77) and AUC_0-t (98.72–105.23) was contained entirely within the predefined 80.00%–125.00% lower and upper limits; in addition, no statistically significant difference was found in T_max (P = 0.1819) after fasted administration of the Test and Reference products. There were 4 mild treatment emergent adverse events, considered unrelated to the study drug, reported by 2 volunteers during the study; no serious adverse events, no suspected unexpected serious adverse events. and no clinically significant changes in laboratory safety, vital signs, or 12-lead ECG measurements were reported. The enantiomer-specific analysis mirrored that of total ibuprofen, with the C_max and AUC_0–t LS mean Test/Reference ratio 90% CI for both ibuprofen S(+) and R(−) enantiomers contained entirely within the predetermined 80%–125.00% limits.ImplicationsThis study found that ibuprofen acid 200 mg orodispersible tablets and ibuprofen acid 200 mg tablets met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence for AUC_0–t and C_max. Post hoc analysis of ibuprofen both S(+) and R(−) enantiomers mirrored the findings for total ibuprofen. All investigational products were found to be well tolerated. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03180879.     

Bioequivalence of Two Intravenous Formulations of Antithrombin III: A Two-Way Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Subjects

Background

Treatment with antithrombin (AT)-III is indicated for patients with sepsis or hereditary AT deficiency.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of 2 AT-III formulations in healthy Korean volunteers to satisfy the regulatory requirements for bioequivalence for marketing purposes.

Methods

A single-center, single-dose, open-label, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean volunteers. Blood samples for the drug analysis were collected for up to 216 hours after drug administration. Participants received either the test or reference formulation of AT-III 100 U/kg IV for 20 minutes in the first period and the alternative formulation in the second period. Both the AT-III activity and antigen (Ag) were measured for the analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, and the prothrombin time and the activated partial thromboplastin time were assessed for the analysis of pharmacodynamic properties. Because AT-III is an endogenous compound, the analysis used data corrected from baseline values. The tolerability of the 2 formulations was also assessed based on physical examinations including vital sign measurements, laboratory tests, and 12-lead ECG.

Results

Of the 20 subjects enrolled (mean [SD] age, height, and weight, 25.3 [2.3] years, 175.3 [4.5] cm, and 67.4 [6.3] kg, respectively), 19 completed both treatment periods; 1 subject withdrew consent for personal reasons. The observed mean (SD) C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_0–∞ of AT-III activity were, respectively, 279.24% (35.92), 14,364.10 (2325.25) %·h, and 17,526.38 (3150.81) %·h with the test formulation and 249.75% (31.96), 12,962.95 (1897.52) %·h, and 15,957.67 (3189.21) %·h with the reference formulation. The observed mean (SD) C_max, AUC_last, and AUC_0–∞ of AT-III Ag were 62.58 (5.66) mg/dL, 3051.94 (401.87) mg/dL·h, and 3639.80 (726.01) mg/dL·h, respectively, with the test formulation and 58.63 (5.27) mg/dL, 2805.08 (272.38) mg/dL·h, and 3340.00 (428.46) mg/dL·h with the reference formulation. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of the log-transformed data for AT-III activity between the 2 formulations were 1.11494 (1.08994–1.14053) for C_max, 1.11305 (1.05435–1.17503) for AUC_last, and 1.11527 (1.03754–1.19889) for AUC_0–∞; corresponding values for AT-III Ag were 1.08802 (1.06258–1.11405), 1.10905 (1.05804–1.16242), and 1.11460 (1.02058–1.21726). During the study period, 8 adverse events were reported, and all were transient, mild, and resolved completely during the treatment period.

Conclusion

The results of the present study showed that these 2 AT-III formulations met the regulatory criteria for pharmacokinetic bioequivalence with respect to AT-III activity and Ag in these healthy Korean subjects. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00846274.     

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Rosuvastatin and Telmisartan in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers: A Randomized,Open-label,Two-period,Crossover, Multiple-dose Study

Purpose

Rosuvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, and telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, are commonly prescribed in combination for the treatment of dyslipidemia accompanied by hypertension. However, the nature of the pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs is not clearly understood. The goal of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction between rosuvastatin and telmisartan in a healthy Korean population.

Methods

This was a randomized, 2-part, open-label, 2-period, crossover, multiple-dose study, with each part composed of different subjects between the ages of 20 and 55 years. In part 1, each subject received rosuvastatin 20 mg with and without telmisartan 80 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In part 2, each subject received telmisartan 80 mg with and without rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily for 6 consecutive days. In both parts, there was a 16-day washout period between mono- and coadministration. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated through interviews and physical examinations.

Findings

In part 1, the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters for coadministration of the 2 drugs to monoadministration of each drug were 1.0736–1.2932 for AUC_τ and 1.7442–2.3229 for C_max,ss for rosuvastatin and 0.9942–1.1594 for AUC_τ and 1.3593–1.7169 for C_max,ss for N-desmethyl rosuvastatin, whereas in part 2, the CIs were 1.0834–1.2672 for AUC_τ and 1.1534–1.5803 for C_max,ss for telmisartan. The most frequently noted AE was cough in part 1, which occurred in 2 subjects receiving the combination therapy, and oropharyngeal pain in part 2, which occurred in 3 subjects receiving the combination therapy. All reported AEs were mild or moderate, and there was no significant difference in incidence between the treatments.

Implications

These findings demonstrated that rosuvastatin and telmisartan mutually affected each other’s pharmacokinetics, suggesting a possibility of drug–drug interaction. However, based on dose–response characteristics of the 2 drugs and previous results from other interaction studies, the degree of drug interaction observed in this study was not regarded as clinically significant. All treatments were well tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01992601.     

Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Rosuvastatin and Metformin in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers: A Randomized,Open-label, 3-period,Crossover, Multiple-dose Study

Purpose

Rosuvastatin is indicated for hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia and metformin mainly for type 2 diabetes. These 2 drugs are frequently prescribed in combination due to the high comorbidity of the 2 diseases. However the nature of pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs has not been previously investigated. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between rosuvastatin and metformin in healthy Korean male volunteers.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, 6-sequence, 3-period, crossover, multiple-dose study. Eligible subjects, aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of the ideal body weight, received 1 of the following 3 treatments for each period once daily for 5 consecutive days with a 10-day washout period between the treatments: monoadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet, monoadministration of metformin 750 mg tablet, and coadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet with metformin 750 mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose and pharmacokinetic parameters for rosuvastatin and metformin were compared between combination and monotherapy. Adverse events were investigated and evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.

Findings

Among the 36 enrolled subjects, 31 completed the study. The coadministration of rosuvastatin with metformin produced a significant pharmacokinetic interaction in rosuvastatin C_ss,max, with the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (coadministration:monoadministration) being 110.27% to 136.39% (P = 0.0029), whereas no significant interaction was observed in rosuvastatin AUC_tau, yielding the 90% CI of 104.41% to 118.95%. When metformin was coadministered with rosuvastatin, no significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed for C_ss,max and AUC_tau of metformin, yielding the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratio for coadministration to monoadministration as 87.38% to 102.54% and 86.70% to 99.08%, respectively. Overall, 19 mild and 1 moderate adverse events occurred in 12 subjects, with no significant differences in the incidence among the 3 treatments.

Implications

Although the C_ss,max of rosuvastatin was significantly influenced by coadministration with metformin, the degree of interaction seen was considered clinically insignificant, with no significant interaction observed in the other pharmacokinetic measures between the 2 drugs. These results imply that drug effects of rosuvastatin and metformin will also not be significantly influenced by coadministration of the 2 drugs. All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01526317.     

Comparison of Scaled-average,Population, and Individual Bioequivalence on 2 Tablets of Pitavastatin Calcium: A 3-Period,Reference-replicated,Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Background

Pitavastatin, a fully synthetic β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, is potent for the treatment of primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia. Recently, the original product and some generic products of pitavastatin calcium have become available in China. However, the intrasubject variability and interchangeability of this newly developed generic product and the branded innovator product have rarely been investigated in the Chinese population.

Purpose

The aim of this study is to develop and compare the scaled-average, population, and individual bioequivalence (BE) of pitavastatin calcium tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers. This study will be used to allow for the interchangeability (switchability and prescribability) of the 2 products in clinical medication in China.

Methods

A single-dose, reference-replicated, 3-period crossover BE study was conducted in 36 healthy male volunteers. Plasma samples were collected before and after oral administration of 2-mg test or reference tablets. A LC-MS/MS method was used to determine the concentration of pitavastatin calcium. A noncompartmental method was used to investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters. The ANOVA and 90% CIs of ln(AUC_0–t) and ln(C_max) were used for statistical analysis of scaled-average BE. A nonparametric test (Wilcoxon signed rank test) was performed to T_max. The analyses of population BE and individual BE were used to assess the switchability and prescribability of the 2 products.

Findings

Thirty-six volunteers were enrolled in this clinical research; 33 volunteers completed the 3 treatment periods. The mean (SD) relative bioavailability calculated from the ratios (T/R) of AUC_0–t was 101.3% (19.7%). The mean ln(AUC_0–t) and ln(C_max) were 98.64 (90% CI, 93.44–104.13) and 98.68 (90% CI, 91.88–105.99) within previously stipulated ranges recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration and the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). The intrasubject %CVs of AUC_0–t and C_max were 12.0% and 18.0% for the reference tablet and 13.0% and 17.0% for the test tablet. No significant differences were found among T_max (0.742 ± 0.276, 0.674 ± 0.202, and 0.689 ± 0.226, respectively) for reference tablet 1, reference Supplemental Table II in the online version at 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.21, and test tablet by a Wilcoxon test (P > 0.05). For ln(AUC_0–t) and ln(C_max), the statistical test-reference ratios were 99.13% and 98.95%, respectively. After inspecting the results for reference and mixed scaling, all the upper confidence limits were <0; therefore, population and individual BE were given.

Implications

In the healthy Chinese males, the generic and branded name tablets of pitavastatin calcium are bioequivalent at the rate and extent of absorption after a comparison of scaled-average, population, and individual BE and thus may be used interchangeably. Both the formulations are generally well tolerated. Chinese Clinical Trial identifier: ChiCTR-TTRCC-13003973.     

Effects of Ketoconazole on the Pharmacokinetic Properties of CG100649, A Novel NSAID: A Randomized,Open-Label Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers

Background

CG100649, a novel selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor that also inhibits carbonic anhydrase I/II, is expected to reduce the cardiovascular risk typical of other NSAIDs. Concurrent medications may influence the activities of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzyme through which CG100649 is metabolized.

Objectives

This study was designed to evaluate the influence of ketoconazole, a known strong inhibitor of CYP3A, on the pharmacokinetic properties of CG100649.

Methods

This randomized, open-label, 2 × 2 crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male volunteers. Each subject received the following 2 treatments in a randomly allocated sequence, separated by a washout period of 42 days: single oral dose of CG100649 6 mg, and concurrent dosing of CG100649 6 mg and ketoconazole 400 mg followed by ketoconazole 400 mg/d over 4 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected at 0 (predose), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 240, 384, and 480 hours after dosing of CG100649 in each sequence. Tolerability assessments were performed throughout the study.

Results

Thirty subjects participated, and 26 subjects completed the study. Seventeen adverse events (AEs) were reported in 10 subjects, and all AEs were recovered without any sequelae. No serious AEs were reported. Six subjects receiving the single dose of CG100649 had 9 AEs, and 7 subjects receiving the combination of ketoconazole and CG100649 had 8 AEs. The C_max of CG100649 with CG100649 only and with concurrent administration of CG100649 + ketoconazole were similar (10.7 and 11.0 ng/mL, respectively). The CG100649 AUC_last with concurrent ketoconazole was 1.29-fold greater than that with CG100649 only (2074.0 and 2685.8 ng · h/mL) and demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in vital signs, clinical laboratory test results, ECGs, or AEs between treatments.

Conclusion

Although the AUC of CG100649 increased by 29% with the concurrent medication of ketoconazole, it is considered that concurrent administration of CG100649 with ketoconazole would not change the safety profile of CG100649. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01154764.     

Assessment of Tacrolimus Absorption From the Human Intestinal Tract: Open-Label,Randomized, 4-Way Crossover Study

Background

Tacrolimus is an established immunosuppressant used for the prevention and treatment of allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. An immediate-release oral formulation of tacrolimus has been commercially available since 1994 that is administered orally BID. To improve the compliance and quality of life of transplant patients, a once-daily modified release (MR) formulation is an attractive option. However, to be successful, the drug of interest must be sufficiently well absorbed from the distal region of the gastrointestinal tract.

Objective

To facilitate the development of an MR formulation, we investigated the absorption of tacrolimus from different regions of the human gastrointestinal tract, proximal and distal small bowels, and ascending colon.

Methods

The study was performed as an open-label, randomized, 4-way crossover design in 6 healthy white male subjects. For each subject, 1 mg (2 mg/mL) of tacrolimus solution in polyethylene glycol 400 was administered to each location in the gastrointestinal tract via a site-specific radiolabeled delivery capsule, which can release tacrolimus solution at specific sites of the gastrointestinal tract. Real-time visualization of capsule location and tacrolimus release at each target site was performed by using γ-scintigraphy. Blood samples were collected to determine tacrolimus levels in the blood. The pharmacokinetic parameters C_max, T_max after the capsule activation, AUC_0–24, and mean residence time were determined from the concentration–time profiles.

Results

Ten healthy male subjects underwent dosing. Six subjects completed all 4 treatments. Three adverse events (mild headache [n = 1], small amount of blood in stool [n = 1], and mild syncopal episode [n = 1]) that were possibly study drug related were reported in 3 different subjects. Tacrolimus was absorbed from not only the small intestine but also from the colonic region of the gastrointestinal tract. Although AUC_0–24 values revealed some site-specific absorption tendencies, the mean AUC_0–24 values obtained were similar regardless of the location of tacrolimus release from the capsule.

Conclusions

Tacrolimus was absorbed from the duodenum to the colon in these male subjects, although differences were observed in the value of AUC_0–24, possibly due to variation in cytochrome P450 3A4 activity in the intestine. Although this study was conducted in small group of healthy fasting men, the present results indicate that tacrolimus is suitable for MR formulation development due to a wide absorption window throughout the intestine in humans.     

The Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel Compared With the Concurrent Administration of Acetylsalicylic Acid and Clopidogrel in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized,Open-Label, 2-Sequence, 2-Period,Single-Dose Crossover Study

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is used for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome. A combined formulation of ASA and clopidogrel has been developed to provide dosing convenience and improve adherence.

Objective

This study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetic properties and safety profile of a fixed-dose combination formulation of ASA and clopidogrel with concurrent administration of each agent in healthy male Korean volunteers.

Methods

This single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 64 healthy Korean volunteers. Equal numbers of eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive either the fixed-dose combination of ASA 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg or the free combination of each agent followed by a 7-day washout period and then administration of the alternate formulation. Serial blood samples were collected immediately before and after dosing for 24 hours. The safety profile was evaluated by using adverse events (AEs), which were assessed by physical examination, vital signs, ECGs, clinical laboratory tests, and interviews. The 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for the log-transformed C_max and AUC_0–last values were within the predetermined range of 0.8 to 1.25.

Results

Sixty-four volunteers (mean [SD] age, 27.51 [8.15] years; weight, 68.55 [7.86] kg; height, 173.80 [5.94] cm) were enrolled, and 63 completed the study. For ASA, the 90% CIs for the geometric mean ratios of C_max and AUC_0–last were 0.9483 to 1.1717 and 0.9946 to 1.1020, respectively. For salicylic acid, the 90% CIs were 0.9614 to 1.0396 for C_max and 0.9778 to 1.0163 for AUC_0–last. For clopidogrel, the 90% CIs were 0.9809 to 1.2562 for C_max and 0.9674 to 1.2073 for AUC_0–last. Six of the 20 AEs reported were drug related: decreased hemoglobin levels (n = 2), fever (n = 1), and headache (n = 1) with the test formulation and increased alanine aminotransferase levels (n = 1) and dyspepsia (n = 1) with the reference formulation. All of the drug-related AEs were transient and mild in severity.

Conclusions

The fixed-dose combination of ASA and clopidogrel 100 mg/75 mg did not meet the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence as defined by the Korea Food and Drug Administration. Both formulations were well tolerated in these healthy male Korean subjects. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01448330