Dopamine agonists: the treatment for Parkinson's disease in the XXI century?

Levodopa combined with a peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DCI) has been considered the therapy of choice for Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa is nearly always effective, but has a high incidence of adverse effects with long term use, including response fluctuations (on/off phenomena) and dyskinesias. Dopaminergic agonists, acting directly at the receptor level, would be able to decrease the incidence of these motor complications.In progressive neurodegenerative diseases, such as PD, modification of the rate of disease progression (often referred to as neuroprotection) is currently a highly debated topic. Increased oxidative stress is thought to be involved in nigral cell death, that is characteristic of PD. This oxidative stress may be further exacerbated by levodopa therapy. These mechanisms have been proven in vitro and animal models, but it's relevance in humans remains speculative.Based on the considerations above, the emerging therapeutic strategies for PD advocate early use of dopamine agonists in the treatment of PD. A number of recent well-controlled studies have proven the efficacy of dopamine agonists used as monotherapy. Moreover, as predicted by animal studies, on the long term, dopaminergic agonists induce significantly less motor complications than levodopa.In the last 2years, three new dopamine agonists have been launched, including ropinirole, pramipexole and cabergoline. These new agonists have been added, as therapeutical options to well-established drugs, like pergolide, bromocriptine or talipexole. The recently launched compounds have proven efficacy in monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy to levodopa. Unfortunately, only a very limited amount of comparative data among the different agonists is available. Pergolide has proven to be a superior drug to bromocriptine as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in a significant number of studies and is considered the gold standard dopamine agonist. Nevertheless, none of the recently launched compounds has compared itself against pergolide.A comparison of monotherapy trials is difficult, because of differences in design and populations. In a recently completed trial pergolide was statistically significantly better than placebo in all the efficacy parameters tested, with 57% of pergolide treated patients improving over 30% in the motor section of the UPDRS, as compared to 17% in the placebo arm. Interestingly, these results were obtained in the absence of any other antiparkinsonian drug during the trial. Recent monotherapy trials done with ropinirole and pramipexole achieved also significant improvements as monotherapy, but in these cases selegeline, a drug that causes a symptomatic improvement in PD, was allowed as co-medications during the trial. Not all trials used the same efficacy measures, i.e. monotherapy trials with pergolide and ropinirole used a "responder" based analysis (responder were all patients that improved 30% or more on the motor section of UPDRS), as well as a baseline to endpoint improvement in motor scores. Pramipexole monotherapy trials used only the latter approach, which is clinically less powerful than a responder analysis.Even with the difficulties mentioned above, all the recent trials with dopamine agonists have proven that these drugs are a useful symptomatic long term treatment for PD with or without levodopa and that the early use of dopamine agonists reduces the incidence of motor complications as compared to levodopa.     

Characterization of subclinical tremor in Parkinson's disease.

The physiological or pathological nature of subclinical tremor amplitude in Parkinson's disease (PD) is not well established. We analyzed characteristics of resting and postural tremors of subclinical amplitude in 17 patients with idiopathic PD without visible resting tremor, having a postural tremor in their least-affected hand rated 0 (12 subjects) or 1 (5 subjects) on Item 21 of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, compared to 17 control subjects matched for age, sex, and handedness. Tremor was recorded at the tip of the index finger using a displacement laser transducer. Overall results show that subclinical resting tremor in PD is significantly different from physiological tremor in terms of amplitude fluctuation, frequency dispersion, harmonic index, and proportional power in 4 to 6 Hz. No significant differences were found for postural tremor. These differences appear to originate mainly from patients with the mixed form of the disease. This study also confirms the preservation of physiological tremor likely originating from a distinct central oscillator in PD. The use of this method in the early and detailed characterization of PD tremors when amplitude is still within normal limits is proposed.     

Long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson's disease: results from a European multicenter trial.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a subsequent open-label phase was conducted in 354 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and motor fluctuations under individually adjusted therapy with levodopa. During the double-blind phase 174 patients received pramipexole and 180 placebo. In agreement with previous studies, pramipexole treatment improved UPDRS sum scores of parts II and III by 30% and off times by approximately 2.5 hours per day. Differences between the treatment groups became significant at a daily dose of 0.75 mg of pramipexole dihydrochloride. We, furthermore, performed post hoc analyses with respect to resting tremor and depression. Patients with pronounced resting tremor derived a clear benefit from pramipexole treatment compared with placebo. In addition, pramipexole significantly improved the subitems motivation/initiative and depression in a subpopulation with increased Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale I scores at the time of inclusion. There were 262 patients who were subsequently enrolled into the open-label study featuring a maximum duration of up to 57 months. Statistical analysis revealed good long-term efficacy and tolerability of pramipexole. Overall, only a low prevalence of somnolence was found. In summary, this study provides additional level I evidence of the usefulness of pramipexole, suggests a particular tremorlytic and a possible antidepressant action of this compound, and addresses for the first time its efficacy and safety during long-term administration in advanced PD.     

Pergolide in the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Introduced on the market in 1989, pergolide, a D1/D2 dopamine receptor agonist, is still widely prescribed for the treatment of patients with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). Initially, pergolide was introduced as an adjunct therapy to levodopa treatment in patients exhibiting fluctuating motor responses and dyskinesias. Results of recent randomized controlled clinical trials in de novo patients with PD show that pergolide is able to improve parkinsonian symptoms when used as monotherapy. Moreover, preliminary results of a long-term monotherapy study in early PD suggest that pergolide is as effective as levodopa, and that a significant delay in the time of the onset of levodopa-induced motor complications can be obtained. A number of randomized studies have shown that pergolide is more effective than bromocriptine as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with advanced PD; the greater benefit found with pergolide could be ascribed to its action on both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. However, controlled comparative studies with new dopamine agonists, such as ropinirole, cabergoline, and pramipexole, have not been performed yet. Interestingly, few open studies in patients with complicated PD have shown that high doses of pergolide (> 6 mg/d) are able to improve motor fluctuations and dyskinesias through a dramatic reduction of levodopa dosage. The side-effect profile of pergolide is similar to that of other dopamine agonists, and complications such as sleep attack and serosal fibrosis have been rarely reported.     

Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a 16-week bromocriptine controlled study

Background: and objectives Ropinirole is a non-ergoline, selective dopamine D₂ agonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) complicated by motor fluctuations. Methods: A total of 76 patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage II to IV) were included in this trial. Each patient was randomly allocated to receive either ropinirole (n = 37) or bromocriptine (n = 39) as an adjunct to levodopa over a 16-week period. Ropinirole and bromocriptine were titrated for optimal efficacy and tolerability. This optimal dose was then maintained for the rest of the study. Response rate was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved at least a 20 % reduction in levodopa dose. Clinical status was also assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and reduction in time spent ‘off’. Results: Ropinirole produced a significantly greater response rate than bromocriptine (odds ratio 2.995, 95 % C. I. (1.157, 7.751) p < 0.05). There was also a statistically significant difference between the groups in the proportion of patients who were ‘improved’ on the CGI improvement scale (91.9 % for ropinirole, 74.3 % for bromocriptine, p = 0.046). Other measures, including at least a 20 % improvement in the UPDRS motor score (70 % for ropinirole and 63.3 % for bromocriptine), and a 20 % reduction in ‘off’ duration (81 % for ropinirole and 52.4 % for bromocriptine) showed a trend in favour of ropinirole. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the overall incidence of adverse effects (ropinirole, 59.5 %; bromocriptine, 59 %). In each group, the most common side-effects were dizziness, dyskinesia and nausea/vomiting. No patients were withdrawn from the study because of side-effects. Conclusion: Ropinirole was found to be safe and well-tolerated. Ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in the treatment of PD with motor fluctuation was associated with more significant reduction of levodopa dose and, on one form of analysis, with significantly greater improvement in CGI ratings than bromocriptine. On the other efficacy measures the two drugs were comparable. Received: 4 September 2001, Received in revised form: 8 May 2002, Accepted: 31 July 2002 This study was supported by SmithKline Beecham Korea and presented at the XIII International Congress on Parkinson's Disease, Vancouver, Canada, July 24–28, 1999. Correspondence to Joo-Hyuk Im, MD     

Tremors in early Parkinson's disease

We examined 50 untreated parkinsonian patients with a complaint of tremor for the presence of a resting, postural, or kinetic tremor. Tremors were recorded by an accelerometer to determine amplitude and frequency. A postural tremor was present in 92% and a resting tremor in 76%. The amplitude of postural tremor was greater than resting tremor in 50%, the same in 25%, and less in 25%. The average tremor frequency of resting and postural tremor was not significantly different. Carbidopa/levodopa reduced testing tremor in 58% and postural tremor in 46% of patients. The dopamine agonist naxoglide (PHNO) reduced resting tremor in 77% and postural tremor in 70% of patients. Postural tremor was not worsened by either drug. It is concluded that tremors in both the resting and postural positions are an integral part of the symptoms of Parkinson's disease and that both tremors have a similar frequency and pharmacological responsiveness in the early phases of the disease.     

Ten-year follow-up of Parkinson's disease patients randomized to initial therapy with ropinirole or levodopa.

In a 5-year, double-blind study, subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) who were randomized to initial treatment with ropinirole had a significantly lower incidence of dyskinesia compared with subjects randomized to levodopa, although Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores were significantly more improved in the levodopa group. Subjects who completed the original study were eligible to participate in a long-term extension study conducted according to an open, naturalistic design and were evaluated approximately every 6 months until they had been followed for a total of 10 years. Comparing subjects randomized to initial treatment with ropinirole (n = 42) and levodopa (n = 27), the incidence of dyskinesia was significantly lower in the ropinirole group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1, 1.0; P = 0.046) and the median time to dyskinesia was significantly longer (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8; P = 0.007). The incidence of at least moderate wearing off ("off" time >/=26% of the awake day) was also significantly lower in the ropinirole group (adjusted OR = 0.3; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.03; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in change in UPDRS activities of daily living or motor scores, or scores for the 39-item PD questionnaire, Clinical Global Impression, or the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Early treatment decisions for individual patients depend largely on the anticipated risk of side effects and long-term complications. Both ropinirole and levodopa are viable treatment options in early PD.     

A double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled study of the adenosine A2A antagonist theophylline in Parkinson's disease

Blockade of the adenosine A2A receptor potentiates the effects of levodopa in experimental animals and may offer a novel nondopaminergic target for drug therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). Open-label trials suggest that the nonspecific adenosine antagonist theophylline improves parkinsonian symptoms and increases ON time in advanced patients with PD. In a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial, the authors investigated the ability of stable plasma levels of theophylline (between 10-20 microg/mL after 15 days of treatment) to modulate the long-duration response and the short-duration response of levodopa in 10 patients with PD. Although theophylline induced a longer duration of the effect of levodopa in all Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale variables considered, including dyskinesias, maximal levodopa-induced improvement and the duration of the effect of levodopa did not differ significantly from placebo. Only the secondary variable "akinesia" showed a statistical tendency to a more prolonged beneficial response with theophylline during an acute levodopa test (short-duration response), and tremor worsened with theophylline during levodopa withdrawal (long-duration response). No differences were observed during the subacute course of study medication added to levodopa. During this exploratory study, the effects of theophylline were not strong enough to potentiate clearly the antiparkinsonian action of levodopa or to increase ON time in patients with advanced PD.     

Myoclonus or tremor in orthostatism: an under-recognized cause of unsteadiness in Parkinson's disease.

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) often complain of unsteadiness. This can occur as the result of various neurological dysfunctions, including changes in postural adjustments, loss of postural reflexes, axial akinesia and rigidity, freezing and/or postural hypotension. In some cases these symptoms remain unexplained, and rare cases of unsteadiness have been attributed to tremor on standing. To delineate this condition, we investigated 11 consecutive PD patients with unexplained unsteadiness because of tremor on standing, seen in our department over a 6-year period. All the patients had detailed clinical and electrophysiological investigations based on surface polygraphic electromyographic recordings. Four patients had fast orthostatic tremor (13-18 Hz), one had intermediate orthostatic tremor (8-9 Hz), and three had slow orthostatic tremor (4-6 Hz). The remaining 3 patients had orthostatic myoclonus, a condition that has not previously been reported in PD. Patients with fast tremor improved on clonazepam. Patients with slow tremor and myoclonus improved on levodopa and sometimes benefited further when clonazepam was added. These observations show the usefulness of neurophysiological investigations for diagnosing and treating unexplained unsteadiness in Parkinson's disease.     

The timing of antiparkinsonian treatment reduction after subthalamic nucleus stimulation

The objective of this work was to precisely analyse the reduction of the antiparkinsonian treatment in 18 consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) operated on for bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation, first after 1 month of follow-up, then at 1 year postoperatively. Trihexyphenidyle, selegiline, entacapone, apomorphine and lisuride could be withdrawn shortly after starting STN electrical stimulation. The levodopa mean daily dose was reduced by 57% at 1 month after surgery and remained stable at 1 year. The mean ropinirole and bromocriptine daily dose decrements after surgery corresponded to 54 and 63%, respectively, at 1 month and to 77 and 40% at 1 year. At 12 months postoperatively, one third of the patients no longer received any antiparkinsonian drugs and the others were on monotherapy of either levodopa or dopamine agonists or received a combined treatment of a dopaminergic agonist and levodopa. In conclusion, STN stimulation allows a major reduction and simplification of antiparkinsonian treatment which can usually be achieved during the early postoperative period.     

Does combined levodopa and bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson's disease prevent late motor complications?

Levodopa-carbidopa (LD) in low dosages adequately controls symptoms in most patients with Parkinson's disease and delays the appearance of fluctuations and dyskinesias. It has been suggested that early combination therapy with bromocriptine and levodopa delays or prevents the onset of late treatment complication associated with LD monotherapy in Parkinson's disease. We have conducted this study to assess the possible benefit of combined therapy compared with levodopa monotherapy. Seventy-eight previously untreated patients with Parkinson's disease were recruited over a period of 54 months and randomly allocated to either a levodopa-carbidopa (LD) Group or a levodopa-carbidopa in combination with low-dose bromocriptine (LD-Br) Group. The appearance of motor complications determined the end point of the study. We gradually increased the doses of bromocriptine (2.5–15 mg/d) or levodopa (125–500 mg/d) until the maximum "on" time was reached. In six patients, the doses of levodopa had to be increased up to the optimal dose (625–1000 mg/day). In the last evaluation the on-time and parkinsonian disability were similar in both treatment groups. We did not find statistically significant differences in the frequency of motor complications when comparing the two groups of treatment. Our study suggests that early combination of levodopa and bromocriptine does not confer any clinical benefit over levodopa alone in treating early Parkinson's disease, nor will it influence the evolution of the disease.     

Ropinirole therapy for Parkinson's disease

Ropinirole (Requip, GlaxoSmithKline) is a novel nonergoline dopamine D2 agonist indicated for the treatment of early and advanced Parkinson's disease. It is mainly metabolized by the liver and its elimination half-life is approximately 5.8 h. When used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease, ropinirole improves signs and symptoms of the disorder. When used as an adjunct to levodopa in advanced Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations, ropinirole reduces off time and allows a reduction of levodopa dose. The initial use of ropinirole in early Parkinson's disease to which levodopa is added when necessary, has been demonstrated to lead to a lower incidence of dyskinesias compared with treatment with levodopa alone. An 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography study suggested the possibility that ropinirole could slow the progression of loss of dopamine neurons compared with treatment with levodopa but this remains to be proven. Side effects of ropinirole include nausea, somnolence, edema, orthostatic hypotension, hallucinations and dyskinesia. A once-daily formulation of ropinirole is currently in development that has the potential for greater convenience, improved tolerability and greater efficacy.     

Development of dyskinesias in a 5-year trial of ropinirole and L-dopa.

A 5-year trial of ropinirole and levodopa in early Parkinson's disease showed that ropinirole is associated with reduced incidence of dyskinesias. This post hoc analysis investigated whether the dyskinesia-sparing benefit of ropinirole is lost when levodopa is added to the regimen and evaluated other risk factors for developing dyskinesias. Patients receiving levodopa had a significantly higher risk of dyskinesias than those taking ropinirole monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.23-14.29; P < 0.001). When patients randomized to ropinirole were treated with supplementary levodopa, the development of dyskinesias was not significantly different from that in those receiving levodopa from the start (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.48-1.33; P = 0.39). However, the onset of dyskinesias was delayed by around 3 years compared with levodopa monotherapy. Adjusted analyses taking into account baseline and on-treatment factors that influenced use of supplementary levodopa or the development of dyskinesias produced similar results. In conclusion, the risk of developing dyskinesias during maintained initial ropinirole monotherapy is very low. Only once levodopa is added does the risk substantially change. Early use of ropinirole postpones the onset of dyskinesias, but these benefits decline when levodopa therapy is started, with no evidence of a subsequent rapid "catch-up" or a persisting preventive effect.     

Parkinsonian action tremor: interference with object manipulation and lacking levodopa response

It has been postulated that Parkinsonian action tremor is distinct from classical resting tremor and that it may contribute to a loss of manual dexterity in Parkinson's disease. We analyzed pinch grip coordination in 20 patients with Parkinson's disease. An object with and without an additional 500 g weight was grasped, lifted and held for a short time with opposed thumb and index finger. Force sensors recorded the force exerted by both fingers. Spectral analysis of the force traces was performed. Transition times between grasping and lifting the object were measured. 18 age matched normal volunteers served as a control group. While holding the object, there were force oscillations in the 3.5-6.5 Hz band indicating (reemerging) classical Parkinsonian tremor in 65% of the patients. This was reduced to 15-20% under levodopa. Oscillations in the 6-15 Hz band were found in 30% (50% with weight) of the patients, remaining unchanged under levodopa, and in 10% (20% with weight) of the normal controls. During lift initiation, 6-15 Hz oscillations were found in all patients and the majority of controls. The band power was positively correlated with the movement transition times in the severely akinetic patients and was significantly higher than in controls. It remained unchanged under levodopa. Our data confirm that Parkinsonian action tremor activated during complex voluntary movements is distinct from classical resting tremor. It does not show a clear levodopa response but affects dextrous movement coordination when associated with clinically severe overall akinesia.     

A 3-year randomized trial of ropinirole and bromocriptine in early Parkinson's disease. The 053 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of ropinirole with bromocriptine over 3 years in patients with early PD with limited or no previous dopaminergic therapy. METHODS: In this prospective, double-blind, parallel-group study, 335 patients were randomized to 0.75 mg ropinirole or 1.25 mg bromocriptine titrated upward at weekly intervals--maximum permitted daily doses were 24 mg ropinirole, 40 mg bromocriptine. RESULTS: Approximately one third of patients in each group withdrew prematurely, mostly because of adverse experiences; 61/102 (60%) of ropinirole-treated and 59/112 (53%) of bromocriptine-treated patients completed the study on the dopamine agonist alone. Mean doses for all patients at completion were 12 mg (SD 6) ropinirole and 24 mg (SD 8) bromocriptine. Occurrence of adverse experiences in both groups was similar. Emergence of dyskinesias was low. Both treatments induced marked improvements in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale activities of daily living (ADL, Part II) and motor (Part III) scores over the first 12 weeks, which were maintained during the study. After 3 years, patients in the ropinirole group had a mean improvement in motor score of 31% compared with 22% in the bromocriptine group (p = 0.086) and a significantly better ADL score (treatment difference 1.46 points, p = 0.009) [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: Both dopamine agonists are effective in the early treatment of a high proportion of PD patients; effectiveness persists for at least 3 years. Those who completed the study had a significantly better functional status on ropinirole than on bromocriptine.     

Dopamine agonists in the treatment of early Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis

Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of dopamine agonists (DA) as monotherapy as well as adjunctive therapy for the early treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). A systematic literature search was conducted through April 2007. Both efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated. DA monotherapy showed superior efficacy but more frequent adverse events compared to placebo. In addition, DA demonstrated inferior efficacy to levodopa, but was associated with fewer motor complications. However, DAs were associated with a greater incidence of nuisance side effects, such as hallucinations, somnolence and dizziness. The use of DA is an effective treatment option for the treatment of early PD and appears especially useful among PD patients with wearing-off phenomenon or dyskinesias on levodopa; however it may result in more adverse events and higher withdrawal rates.     

Corticomuscular coherence is increased in the small postural tremor of Parkinson's disease.

The mechanisms and electrophysiological characteristics of the postural tremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) have not been defined. We hypothesized that PD subjects with small amplitude postural tremor would show increased corticomuscular coherence at certain frequencies compared to PD subjects without visible tremor. Four groups of participants were studied: (1) Control without postural tremor, (2) Control with small amplitude postural tremor, (3) PD without postural tremor, and (4) PD with small amplitude postural tremor. Accelerometry and electroencephalography-electromyography fast-fourier transform and corticomuscular coherence spectra were generated. Findings showed (1) elevated corticomuscular coherence centered at 12-18 Hz in PD with small amplitude postural tremor; (2) 5-12 Hz accelerometer frequency peaks that did not shift with increasing weight loads in some individuals; and (3) 5-8 Hz accelerometer peaks that shifted frequency with increasing weight loads, consistent with a peripheral-mechanical oscillator in all groups. The small amplitude postural tremor in PD arises from heterogeneous oscillator mechanisms. The discovery of increased corticomuscular coupling shows cortical involvement in the small amplitude postural tremor of PD.     

Slowing Parkinson's disease progression: recent dopamine agonist trials

In recent clinical trials, chronic treatment of patients with PD with pramipexole or ropinirole was associated with a slower decline of imaged striatal dopaminergic signal, compared to levodopa monotherapy. Although this could reflect slowed progression of PD, equally plausible is a pharmacologic effect on proteins that interact with the imaging radioligands. To date, there is no compelling evidence favoring dopamine agonists over levodopa; either is an appropriate choice for initial treatment of PD.     

Responsiveness of impairments and disabilities in Parkinson's disease

The objective of this study is to evaluate the responsiveness of items of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). A standardized Response Mean (SRM) per item was calculated using data of four trials (n=376) that randomised patients with early PD to dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy or placebo. In the ADL section, the SRMs ranged from -0.04 (no effect) to -0.50 (moderate effect). Hand functions were the most responsive ADL items with 'handwriting' showing the largest response. Self-assessed symptoms were the least responsive. In the Motor section, SRMs ranged from -0.09 to -0.60 with bradykinesia items showing the largest response, especially the item 'finger taps'. The tremor items showed the smallest response, however, rest tremor arms was much more responsive than rest tremor of the head and legs or postural tremor. SRMs in the placebo group ranged from 0.08 to -0.21 in the ADL section and from 0.03 to -0.35 in the Motor section. ADL and motor items have comparable and mostly small effect sizes. The most responsive items are in the ADL section hand functions and in the Motor section bradykinesia items. A more responsive ADL section would omit the self-assessed symptoms and the Motor section would retain only rest tremor arms of the tremor items.     

Choosing dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease

Dopamine agonists (DAs) have been shown to be effective as monotherapy in early stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) and as an adjunctive treatment to levodopa in advanced PD. Since bromocriptine, an ergot compound, was introduced as the first commercially available DA more than 25 years ago, additional DAs have become available for clinical use. There is a remarkable paucity of data, however, that would guide clinicians in their decision process to select the most appropriate DAs. We discuss the theoretical basis for comparing the various DAs, and provide a concise analysis and summary of comparative trials of DAs in PD.