Predictors of clinical outcomes after surgical treatment of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly

Outcomes following the open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly have been inconsistent. Several factors associated with significant poor clinical outcomes have been reported; however, the factor that contributes independently to the outcomes remains unknown. This study aims to identify independent prognostic factors for the outcomes of surgically treated displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly. A total of 86 elderly patients with displaced acetabular fractures were treated by ORIF between May 1990 and June 2010. Matta's criteria and modified Merle d'Aubigne‐Postel score were used as reduction grades and clinical outcome measures, respectively. Reduction grades and six radiographic features were identified as prognostic factors. The six radiographic features include quadrilateral plate fracture, Gull sign, posterior dislocation of hip, femoral head injury (FHI), comminuted posterior wall fracture (CPWF), and posterior wall marginal impaction. The average clinical score of the patients associated with the six radiographic features was 14.4 ± 3.1, whereas the average clinical score for those without was 17.2 ± 1.6 points. The average clinical score of the patients with anatomical, imperfect, and poor reduction were 16.8 ± 2.4, 14.5 ± 2.3, and 11.3 ± 1.4 points, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified three independent predictors of clinical outcomes: reduction grades (t = ?10.45, p = 0.000), CPWF (t = ?2.74, p = 0.008), and FHI (t = ?3.51, p = 0.000). Both CPWF and FHI are important risk factors for clinical outcome. The postoperative quality of reduction independently predicted patient prognosis, and anatomical reduction is predictive of a good prognosis. © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 31: 588–595, 2013     

Open reduction and internal fixation alone versus open reduction and internal fixation plus total hip arthroplasty for displaced acetabular fractures in patients older than 60 years: A prospective clinical trial

IntroductionThe optimal treatment of elderly patients with an acetabular fracture is unknown. We conducted a prospective clinical trial to compare functional outcomes and reoperation rates in patients older than 60 years with acetabular fracture treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) alone versus ORIF plus concomitant total hip arthroplasty (ORIF + THA). Our hypothesis was that patients who had ORIF + THA would have better patient reported outcomes and lower reoperation rates postoperatively.MethodsInclusion criteria were patients older than 60 years with acetabular fracture plus at least one of three fracture characteristics: dome impaction, femoral head fracture, or posterior wall component. Eligible patients were operative candidates based on fracture displacement, ambulatory status, and physiological appropriateness. Patients received either ORIF alone or ORIF + THA (accomplished at same surgery through same incision). Outcome measurements included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index hip score, Short Form 36, Harris Hip Score, and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form scores. Additionally, patients were monitored for any unplanned reoperation within 2 years.ResultsForty-seven of 165 eligible patients with an average age of 70.7 years were included. The mean Harris Hip Score difference favored ORIF + THA (mean difference, 12.3, [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.3 to 24.9, p = 0.07]). No clinically important differences were detected in any other validated outcome score or patient satisfaction score 1 year after surgery. ORIF + THA decreased the absolute risk of reoperation by 28% (95% CI, 13% to 44%, p < 0.01). No postoperative hip dislocation occurred in either group.ConclusionsIn patients older than 60 years with an operative displaced acetabular fracture with specific fracture features (dome impaction, femoral head fracture, or posterior wall component), treatment with ORIF + THA resulted in fewer reoperations than treatment with ORIF alone. No differences in patient satisfaction and other validated outcome measures were detected.     

Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in the Elderly—Acute vs Delayed Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundOptimum management for the elderly acetabular fracture remains undefined. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in this population does not allow early weight-bearing and has an increased risk of failure. This study aimed to define outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the setting of an acetabular fracture and compared delayed THA after acetabular ORIF (ORIF delayed THA) and acute fixation and THA (ORIF acute THA).MethodsAll acetabular fractures in patients older than 60 years who underwent ORIF between 2007 and 2018 were reviewed (n = 85). Of those, 14 underwent ORIF only initially and required subsequent THA (ORIF delayed THA). Twelve underwent an acute THA at the time of the ORIF (ORIF acute THA). The ORIF acute THA group was older (81 ± 7 vs 76 ± 8; P < .01) but had no other demographic- or injury-related differences compared with the ORIF delayed THA group. Outcome measures included operative time, length of stay, complications, radiographic assessments (component orientation, leg-length discrepancy, heterotopic ossification), and functional outcomes using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS).ResultsOperative time (P = .1) and length of stay (P = .5) for the initial surgical procedure (ORIF only or ORIF THA) were not different between groups. Four patients had a complication and required further surgeries; no difference was seen between groups. Radiographic assessments were similar between groups. The ORIF acute THA group had a significantly better OHS (40.1 ± 3.9) than the ORIF delayed THA group (33.6 ± 8.5) (P = .03).ConclusionIn elderly acetabulum fractures, ORIF acute THA compared favorably (a better OHS, single operation/hospital visit, equivalent complications) with ORIF delayed THA. We would thus recommend that in patients with risk factors for failure requiring delayed THA (eg, dome or roof impaction) that ORIF acute THA be strongly considered.     

Osteosynthese bei Acetabulumfrakturen im Alter

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome and incidence of hip arthritis in elderly patients with acetabular fractures. Because of poor bone quality in the elderly, even a low-energy trauma may lead to an acetabular fracture. An anatomical reconstruction of the acetabulum is necessary to achieve sufficient stability also for a potential hip arthroplasty. So far, there is very limited information on the outcome of acetabular fractures in the elderly. During a period of 6 years (2001-2006), 48 patients older than 60 years were admitted to our department with an acetabular fracture. Thirty-nine patients were treated operatively and nine patients non-operatively. Twenty-nine operatively treated patients were followed up. Nineteen of them were assessed using EQ-5D, SF-12 and Merle d'Aubigné questionnaires in addition to their clinical examination. Ten other surgical patients were only examined using the questionnaires. Of the 29 patients that were followed up, 5 underwent total hip arthroplasty due to secondary post-traumatic hip arthritis after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The range of motion of the operated hip was comparable to that of the non-operated contralateral side. However, the internal rotation was found to be slightly decreased at the operated side when compared to the non-operated contralateral side. Merle d'Aubigné score and physical and mental SF-12 score components as well as quality of life were better in patients treated with ORIF compared to those patients that were treated by secondary hip arthroplasty. Regarding the different treatment strategies (ORIF vs primary hip arthroplasty vs non-operative treatment) of acetabular fractures in the elderly, data from the literature are conflicting. Our results indicate that ORIF represents a good treatment option for acetabular fractures in the elderly. In patients that did not develop secondary hip arthritis, a good clinical outcome and quality of life was documented.     

骨折间隙直视下复位固定后踝移位骨折

[目的]介绍骨折断端间隙直视法下三踝骨折中后踝移位骨折复位固定的手术技术与临床效果。[方法]选择2014年1月~2017年12月手足外科收治的三踝骨折中后踝移位骨折患者42例,采用骨折断端间隙直视法复位固定后踝骨折,采用骨骼肌肉功能评分(SMFA)评定患者术后恢复情况。[结果]所有患者均达到骨性愈合,术后未出现需要进行翻修手术或感染的病例,踝关节背伸跖屈功能良好。患者骨骼肌肉功能评分(SMFA)功能障碍指数平均为(8.01±1.73)分,SMFA困扰指数平均为(2.22±1.31)分。所有患者术后平均3个月进行正常的日常生活活动。[结论]对于三踝骨折中后踝移位骨折的治疗,采用后外侧入路骨折断端直视下复位固定方法可能是一种更好的选择。     

Clinical failure after posterior wall acetabular fractures: the influence of initial fracture patterns

OBJECTIVE: To determine radiographic and clinical features that predict rapid failure after open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall acetabular fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective radiographic review and patient follow-up study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-two patients with posterior wall acetabular fractures. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiographs, Merle D'Aubigné scores, Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment. RESULTS: Eleven patients had complete loss of joint space by one year postinjury; eight of these individuals required reconstructive surgery. These patients more commonly had fractures with comminution of three fragments or more (p = 0.001) or fracture into the subchondral arc at the level of the acetabular roof (p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Poor outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation are associated with certain types of posterior wall fracture patterns.     

髋臼后壁边缘压缩骨折的治疗

目的观察切开撬拔复位植骨钢板螺钉内固定术对髋臼边缘压缩骨折的治疗效果。方法对16例髋臼骨折合并边缘压缩骨折的患者采用手术切开复位,对压缩骨折进行撬拨复位和植骨,钢板螺钉内固定术。结果16例平均随访2年,根据Matta的髋臼骨折临床结果评分标准,优9例,良5例,差2例。结论髋臼边缘压缩骨折常见于髋臼后壁骨折患者,易漏诊,要加强对此类型骨折的认识,提高术前确诊率,术中对压缩骨折部分进行撬拔复位和植骨,可获得良好的临床效果。     

Outcome of alternative approach to displaced acetabular fractures

IntroductionAnatomical reduction of displaced acetabular fracture is not without its’ limitations and complications. This study is conducted to assess clinical and radiological outcomes as well as complications of treating displaced acetabular fractures with emphasis on anatomical reduction in weight-bearing area, mainly the posterior column, and imperfect reduction of the anterior column is acceptable. However, stability of both columns is mandatory.MethodsIt was a retrospective study carried out in a Level 1 arthroplasty and trauma centre. 23 patients (17 males, 6 females) with average age of 50.1 years (range, 36–68 years) with displaced acetabular fracture treated with combined incisions and plate-cable systems were included. There were 3 elementary and 18 associated fractures according to Letournel classification. Average follow-up was 23.5 months (range, 12–38.7 months). Mean operation time was 160 min (range: 75–320 min). Functional scores were evaluated using Harris Hip Score (HHS) whilst reduction was assessed by Matta criteria. Any displacement of reduction, osteoarthritis, heterotopic ossification, and other complications was recorded.Result65.2% (15/23) of the patients obtained excellent HHS and 21.7% (5/23) had good HHS. There were 12 anatomical, 6 imperfect, and 5 poor reductions. No displacement was recorded in final follow-up. Complications documented: three lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injuries, two conversions to total hip arthroplasty, three Brooker stage 1 heterotrophic ossification, one pulmonary embolism and one screw irritation. No incidence of wound breakdown, infection and radiological osteoarthritis was reported.ConclusionsImperfect reduction of the anterior column provided clinical outcomes that are as good as total anatomical reduction. This approach minimizes soft tissue damage and reduces perioperative morbidities.     

Acceptable parameters for alignment of distal radius fracture with conservative treatment in elderly patients

BackgroundThere is a conflict in the treatment of distal radius fractures in elderly patients, because fracture reduction does not appear to be as strongly associated with functional outcomes as in younger patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiographic findings of acceptable reduction without leading to wrist dysfunction and poor outcomes.MethodsFifty-two active and healthy elderly patients with conservatively managed distal radius fractures were included in the study. They consisted of 7 men and 45 women, all 60 years or older. Radiographic assessment included volar tilt, radial inclination and ulnar variance, and outcome evaluation included the Mayo wrist score and DASH score. As a control group, the preoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were examined as well for 19 patients older than 60 with malunion, for whom corrective osteotomy was performed because of wrist dysfunction. The radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups in a statistical manner. Correlation coefficients of the radiographic parameters with Mayo wrist score and DASH score were analyzed by multiple regression.ResultsVolar tilt (mean —1.2°) and ulnar variance (mean 2.5 mm), as well as Mayo wrist score (mean 80.0 points) and DASH score (mean 8.6 points) in the objective group were significantly superior to those in the control group when comparing radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes. There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard to RI (mean 14.9°). Multiple regression analysis revealed that volar tilt and ulnar variance were significantly correlated with the clinical outcomes in the objective.ConclusionThe parameters of volar tilt and ulnar variance had a significant correlation with clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes significantly worsened when those parameters exceeded a tolerable range. In elderly patients, it is important to determine an appropriate therapeutic modality for a distal radius fracture when considering the acceptable parameters for alignment.     

The Role of Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Treatment of Acetabular and Femoral Head Fractures

Abstract Background and Purpose: Surgical hip dislocation by trochanteric flip osteotomy facilitates access to acetabular and femoral head fractures. Furthermore, it allows evaluation of cartilage damage and vascularity of the femoral head. In this study the potential benefits of this procedure for improved fracture management and for prognostic assessment were investigated. Patients and Methods: From July 1997 to October 1999, 20 selected patients with displaced acetabular fractures (n = 12), femoral head fractures (n = 7), or combined injuries (n = 1) were included. Inclusion criteria for acetabular fractures were either displaced posterior wall fragments with cranial extension or complex acetabular fractures involving a displaced transverse fracture line. Open reduction and fixation of either complex acetabular fractures or femoral head fractures were carried out through Kocher-Langenbeck approach, trochanteric flip osteotomy, and complete surgical hip dislocation. Additionally, the extent of cartilage destruction and femoral head perfusion were assessed. Results: Anatomic reduction ( 1 mm displacement) of acetabular fractures was achieved in 69% of patients and good reduction ( 3 mm) in 31%. In patients with acetabular fractures, severe cartilage destruction of the acetabulum was found in 38% and of the femoral head in 15%, while patients with isolated femoral head fractures revealed severe cartilage damage of the femoral head in 57%. Arterial bleeding from the femoral head, tested by drilling, was observed in all patients. Secondary dislocation of the trochanteric osteotomy occurred in one patient and made refixation necessary. Patients were reexamined at least 2 years after intervention. 77% of patients with acetabular fractures and all patients with femoral head fractures showed good or excellent results after 32.6 ± 6.1 months according to the functional score of DAubigné & Postel. Conclusion: Surgical hip dislocation allows adequate reconstruction of complex acetabular and femoral head fractures and intraoperative evaluation of local cartilage damage and femoral head perfusion.     

High incidence of osteochondral lesions after open reduction and internal fixation of displaced ankle fractures: Medium-term follow-up of 100 cases

BackgroundThe incidence of osteochondral lesions (OCLs) in association with displaced ankle fractures has only been examined in two previous studies. In both studies magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed prior to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Because MRI may overdiagnose or overestimate the extent of OCLs in an acute trauma setting the aim of this study was to determine the incidence of OCLs after ORIF of displaced ankle fractures using MRI at medium-term follow-up, and to analyse if the severity of fracture or the clinical outcome correlates with the incidence of OCLs.Patients and methodsFollowing institutional review board approval a total of 100 patients (mean age, 41.3 years; range, 17.9–64.3 years) with a displaced ankle fracture who had undergone ORIF according to the AO principles were included in this study. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score was used to quantify the clinical outcome and MR images were evaluated for OCLs of the talus and distal tibia after a mean of 34.5 months (range, 17.5–54.1 months).ResultsOCLs were found in 40.4% of the patients. Logistic regression revealed a significant correlation between the severity of fracture and the incidence of OCLs. Patients with a trimalleolar fracture (p = 0.04) or an ankle fracture dislocation (p = 0.003) had a significantly higher risk for developing an OCL compared to those with a type B fracture. Logistic regression also demonstrated a significant correlation between the clinical outcome (AOFAS score) and the incidence of OCLs (p = 0.01). The risk for developing an OCL increases up to 5.6% when the AOFAS score decreases by one point.ConclusionOCLs were frequently found in association with acute ankle fractures at medium-term follow-up, and the severity of fracture was associated with an increased number of OCLs. Considering the disadvantages of MRI including the high cost and limited availability, the results of this study may help to explain why anatomic surgical realignment of displaced ankle fractures may still be associated with poor clinical outcomes.     

Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with a modern intramedullary nailing system for 2-part proximal humerus fractures

ObjectivesThe optimal surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains controversial. There are advocates for both open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws (ORIF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN). The purpose this study was to evaluate the early-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of IMN for isolated, displaced 2-part surgical neck PHFs using a modern, straight nail system and to determine the effect of preoperative patient and fracture characteristics on outcome.MethodsThis was a case series of 23 patients with displaced 2-part surgical neck PHFs who were treated with ORIF using a straight IMN with minimum follow-up of 1 year (mean 2.5 years [range, 1.1–4.6]). Patients were identified retrospectively and contacted for measurement of active range of motion (AROM) and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Visual Analog Scale Pain score (VAS Pain). Plain radiographs were evaluated to assess the quality of the reduction and failure of fixation. Complications and reoperations were identified.ResultsReduction was anatomic in 12 (52%) patients, acceptable in 9 (39%), and 2 (9%) were malreduced. There were no differences in reduction quality based on sex (p = 0.37), age at surgery (p = 0.68), calcar comminution (p = 0.68), number of screws in the head (p = 0.99), or medial hinge disruption (p = 0.06). At final follow-up, the mean ASES score was 92 ± 10, OSS was 45 ± 4, SANE was 93 ± 7, EQ-5D of 0.85 ± 0.17, and VAS Pain was 0 ± 1. The mean active forward flexion was 143° ± 16°, active external rotation was 68° ± 20°, and internal rotation was T11 ± 4 vertebrae. Two (9%) patients underwent reoperation and 2 (9%) patients experienced clinical failure not requiring reoperation.ConclusionsStraight IMN is a reliable treatment for displaced 2–part surgical neck PHFs with excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes in early follow-up. The implant facilitated anatomic or acceptable alignment of the fracture in the vast majority of patients.     

Cerclage wiring in displaced associated anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures

PurposeThe effects of cerclage wiring in the open reduction and internal fixation of displaced associated anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures were evaluated.MethodsThis is a retrospectively clinical study of such cases where the main surgical strategy was open reduction and internal fixation with cerclage wire and reconstruction plates. Data on 12 cases treated between 1992 and 2011 were collected. The mean follow-up period was 32 (12–132) months.ResultsReduction with a fracture gap of less than 2 mm without articular stepping and solid union was achieved in all 12 cases. Postoperative complication developed in one case of symptomatic arthritis. Excluding the case with symptomatic arthritis, the other cases had good to excellent final D’Aubigne and Postel functional results.ConclusionsCerclage wiring is very useful and effective in the reduction and fixation of displaced associated anterior column and posterior hemi-transverse acetabular fractures, and supplemental fixation with reconstruction plates and screws is necessary.     

大转子后半截骨术在累及臼顶的髋臼骨折中的应用

目的：介绍一种新的大转子截骨方法,并评估后外侧入路联合该方法治疗累及髋臼顶部骨折的治疗效果。方法：2008年3月至2010年11月,采用髋关节后外侧入路联合大转子后半截骨治疗累及臼顶的髋臼骨折30例,其中男21例,女9例;年龄18—70岁,平均35．2岁。按照Letournel—Judet分型：后壁骨折10例,后柱骨折7例,横形骨折5例,T形骨折2例,横形伴后壁骨折1例,后柱伴后壁骨折3例,双柱骨折2例。根据Matta标准评估复位结果,改良的Merled＇Aubigne—Postel评分标准评定髋关节功能及美国医学研究委员会标准评定标准评估外展肌力。结果：所有患者获得随访,时间18—40个月,平均25个月。所有截骨获骨性愈合,平均愈合时间为8．4周（6-12周）。无骨不连、截骨块近端移位、内固定松动、断裂及深部感染等并发症发生。根据Matta标准：解剖复位17例,满意复位12例,不满意1例。末次随访时髋关节功能结果优11例,良15例,可3例,差1例。外展肌力4级3例,5级27例。结论：大转子后半截骨术可以增加臼顶部手术视野,有效提高股骨头与髋臼的解剖对应率,降低复位和固定难度,并发症少,为累及髋臼顸的骨折治疗提供了新思路。     

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain one of the most challenging complications to address. Although the principal treatment modalities for Vancouver type B1 fractures are open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), surgeons have not yet reached a consensus on the optimal method for reduction and fixation. We therefore investigated whether minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) using locking compression plate (LCP) would lead to favorable outcomes for patients with Vancouver type B1 PFFs. In addition, we also compared the outcomes of patients treated with MIPO to those treated with ORIF.MethodWe retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a series of 21 Vancouver type B1 PFFs treated with MIPO and LCP between February 2011 and February 2017. The mean duration of follow-up was 33.8 months. We also compared outcomes of these patients to those of patients with 19 Vancouver type B1 fractures treated with ORIF between April 2006 and December 2011.ResultsFracture healing without complications was achieved in 20 (95.2%) out of 21 cases in the MIPO group and in 14 (87.5%) out of 16 cases in the ORIF group. There was one case of fixation failure with stem subsidence in the MIPO group. In the ORIF group, there were 2 nonunion with metal failure. Operation time was significantly shorter and intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in the MIPO group compared to the ORIF group. However, there were no significant differences in frequency of transfusion, time-to-union, walking abilities, modified Harris hip score, or complications.ConclusionThe radiological and clinical outcomes of MIPO using LCP in patients with Vancouver type B1 PFFs were shown not to be inferior to ORIF and resulted in fewer intraoperative complications than ORIF. If care is taken regarding the stability of femoral implant and optimal surgical techniques, MIPO may be a recommended option in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fracture.     

Single versus double column fixation in transverse fractures of the acetabulum: A randomised controlled trial

IntroductionBiomechanical studies have compared fixation methods in transverse acetabular fractures, yet there is not enough clinical data to suggest an optimal fixation method. The aim of this randomized controlled trail was to compare fracture stability in posterior plating alone versus posterior plating and anterior column lag-screw fixation in treatment of transverse and transverse with posterior wall acetabular fractures.MethodsThirty patients were randomized to one of two groups, either posterior fixation alone (single column group), or posterior plating and anterior fixation with percutaneous anterior column screw (double column group). Patients were followed up with serial radiographic assessments documenting any loss of reduction, utilizing Matta’s radiological criteria, measuring the roof arc angles and by measuring any change in the femoral head offset.ResultsFifteen patients were randomized to each group. Mean patient age was 31 years, mean follow up period was 19 months (range 12–24). There was no significant differences between the two groups with regards the quality of post-operative reduction, blood loss, hospital stay and functional score using the modified Merle D'Aubinge and Postel score. The operative time was significantly longer in the double column fixation group (130 min versus 104 min). There was no loss of reduction observed in either of the two groups.ConclusionSingle poster column fixation in transverse and transverse posterior wall fractures showed similar result to double column fixation, in terms of fractures stability in the follow up period, quality of reduction and early functional outcome.     

Does use of a quadrilateral surface plate improve outcome in elderly acetabular fractures?

BackgroundAcetabular fractures in the elderly frequently involve segmental quadrilateral plate injury, yet no consensus exists on how to best control the femoral head medial displacement. Quadrilateral surface plates (QSP) were developed to help buttress these challenging fractures. The study aims to 1) Determine the prevalence of segmental quadrilateral plate fractures (SQPF) in elderly patients; and 2) Assess if utilization of a QSP is associated with improved acetabulum fracture reduction and outcome.MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a level-1 trauma centre. . All patients over 60-years that sustained an acetabular fracture between 2007 and 2019 were reviewed. Pre-operative pelvic radiographs and CT imaging were reviewed for 96 patients, to assess for SQPF. From the 96 patients reviewed, over one third of patients (n = 40, 41.6%) sustained a SQPF. Patients that had an acute-THA (n = 7) were excluded as were patients that underwent an ORIF but did not have a QSP or an anterior column buttress plate (n = 3). The remaining 30 formed the study’s cohort. We assessed the ability to achieve and maintain reduction in this elderly population, and compared outcomes using traditional anterior column buttress plates (ilioingual or intra-pelvic approach) versus an intra-pelvic pre-contoured buttress suprapectineal plate (QSP). Outcome measures included: fracture reduction using the Matta classification (desirable: anatomical/imperfect and poor), re-operations, conversion to THA and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) (for the preserved hips).ResultsTen patients had an ORIF with utilization of a QSP (QSP-group), and 20 had an ORIF but did not have the QSP (non-QSP-group). There was no difference in patient demographics between groups. Fracture patterns were also similar (p = 0.6). Postoperative fracture reduction was desirable (anatomical/imperfect) in 17 patients and poor in 13. Improved ability to achieve a desirable reduction was seen in the QSP-group (p = 0.02). Conversion to THA was significantly lower in patients that had a desirable fracture reduction (appropriate: 3/17; poor: 7/13). No patients in the QSP-group have required a THA to-date, compared to 10/20 patients in the non-QSP-group (p = 0.01). The mean time to THA was 1.6 ± 2.1 year. There was no difference in OHS between the two groups (34.4 ± 10.3).ConclusionElderly acetabulum fractures have a high incidence (approaching 40%) of segmental QPF. Desirable (anatomical/imperfect) fracture reduction was associated with improved outcome. The use of a QSP was associated with improved ability to achieve an appropriate reduction. A QSP should be considered as they are both reliable and reproducible with a significantly improved fracture reduction and lower conversion to THA.     

Does use of a quadrilateral surface plate improve outcome in elderly acetabular fractures?

BackgroundAcetabular fractures in the elderly frequently involve segmental quadrilateral plate injury, yet no consensus exists on how to best control the femoral head medial displacement. Quadrilateral surface plates (QSP) were developed to help buttress these challenging fractures. The study aims to 1) Determine the prevalence of segmental quadrilateral plate fractures (SQPF) in elderly patients; and 2) Assess if utilization of a QSP is associated with improved acetabulum fracture reduction and outcome.MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a level-1 trauma centre. . All patients over 60-years that sustained an acetabular fracture between 2007 and 2019 were reviewed. Pre-operative pelvic radiographs and CT imaging were reviewed for 96 patients, to assess for SQPF. From the 96 patients reviewed, over one third of patients (n = 40, 41.6%) sustained a SQPF. Patients that had an acute-THA (n = 7) were excluded as were patients that underwent an ORIF but did not have a QSP or an anterior column buttress plate (n = 3). The remaining 30 formed the study’s cohort. We assessed the ability to achieve and maintain reduction in this elderly population, and compared outcomes using traditional anterior column buttress plates (ilioingual or intra-pelvic approach) versus an intra-pelvic pre-contoured buttress suprapectineal plate (QSP). Outcome measures included: fracture reduction using the Matta classification (desirable: anatomical/imperfect and poor), re-operations, conversion to THA and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) (for the preserved hips).ResultsTen patients had an ORIF with utilization of a QSP (QSP-group), and 20 had an ORIF but did not have the QSP (non-QSP-group). There was no difference in patient demographics between groups. Fracture patterns were also similar (p = 0.6). Postoperative fracture reduction was desirable (anatomical/imperfect) in 17 patients and poor in 13. Improved ability to achieve a desirable reduction was seen in the QSP-group (p = 0.02). Conversion to THA was significantly lower in patients that had a desirable fracture reduction (appropriate: 3/17; poor: 7/13). No patients in the QSP-group have required a THA to-date, compared to 10/20 patients in the non-QSP-group (p = 0.01). The mean time to THA was 1.6 ± 2.1 year. There was no difference in OHS between the two groups (34.4 ± 10.3).ConclusionElderly acetabulum fractures have a high incidence (approaching 40%) of segmental QPF. Desirable (anatomical/imperfect) fracture reduction was associated with improved outcome. The use of a QSP was associated with improved ability to achieve an appropriate reduction. A QSP should be considered as they are both reliable and reproducible with a significantly improved fracture reduction and lower conversion to THA.     

手术治疗髋臼后壁骨折45例

目的：探讨应用重建钢板内固定治疗髋臼后壁骨折的临床疗效。方法：对45例经手术复位重建钢板内固定治疗的髋臼后壁骨折进行回顾性分析,男31例,女14例;年龄19～68岁,平均37.6岁。合并髋关节脱位者41例。全部后侧Kocher-Langenbeck切口。结果：45例均获随访,随访时间为12～48个月,平均26个月。按Matta的X线复位标准和Matta改良的d＇Aubigne临床标准评估,解剖复位38例,满意复位7例;临床结果优30例,良10例,一般5例,优良率为88.9%。本组中发生创伤性关节炎4例,股骨头坏死2例,异位骨化2例,下肢深静脉血栓1例,无切口感染和骨不愈合。结论：重建钢板内固定治疗髋臼后壁骨折可获得满意的临床疗效。骨折复位质量、伤后至手术时间、骨折粉碎程度、手术经验是影响髋臼后壁骨折治疗效果的关键。