Treatment adherence and outcomes in flexible vs standard continuous positive airway pressure therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare adherence and clinical outcomes between flexible positive airway pressure (PAP) [C-Flex; Respironics; Murraysville, PA] and standard PAP therapy (ie, continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP]). DESIGN AND SETTING: A controlled clinical trial of CPAP therapy vs therapy using the C-Flex device in participants with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea. Participants were recruited from and followed up through an academic sleep disorders center. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-nine participants were recruited into the study after they had undergone complete in-laboratory polysomnography and before initiating therapy. Participants received either therapy with CPAP (n = 41) or with the C-Flex device (n = 48), depending on the available treatment at the time of recruitment, with those recruited earlier receiving CPAP therapy and those recruited later receiving therapy with the C-Flex device. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3 months. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The groups were similar demographically. The mean (+/- SD) treatment adherence over the 3-month follow-up period was higher in the C-Flex group compared to the CPAP group (weeks 2 to 4, 4.2 +/- 2.4 vs 3.5 +/- 2.8, respectively; weeks 9 to 12, 4.8 +/- 2.4 vs 3.1 +/- 2.8, respectively). Clinical outcomes and attitudes toward treatment (self-efficacy) were also measured. Change in subjective sleepiness and functional outcomes associated with sleep did not improve more in one group over the other. Self-efficacy showed a trend toward being higher at the follow-up in those patients who had been treated with the C-Flex device compared to CPAP treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Therapy with the C-Flex device may improve overall adherence over 3 months compared to standard therapy with CPAP. Clinical outcomes do not improve consistently, but C-Flex users may be more confident about their ability to adhere to treatment. Randomized clinical trials are needed to replicate these findings.     

The effects of 1-year treatment with a herbst mandibular advancement splint on obstructive sleep apnea, oxidative stress, and endothelial function

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with endothelial dysfunction. In the current study, we assessed the effect of long-term modified Herbst mandibular advancement splint (MAS) treatment on OSA, oxidative stress markers, and on endothelial function (EF). METHODS: A total of 16 subjects participated (11 men and 5 women; mean [+/- SD] age, 54.0 +/- 8.3 years; mean body mass index, 28.0 +/- 3.1 kg/m(2)), 12 of whom completed the 1-year evaluation. Apnea severity, levels of oxidative stress markers, and EF were assessed after 3 months and 1 year of receiving treatment. For comparison, 6 untreated patients underwent two evaluations 9 months apart, and 10 non-OSA individuals were assessed once as a reference group. The results are presented as the mean +/- SD. RESULTS: The mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) decreased significantly from 29.7 +/- 18.5 events/h before treatment to 17.7 +/- 11.1 events/h after 3 months of treatment and 19.6 +/- 11.5 events/h after 1 year of treatment (p < 0.005 for both). The mean Epworth sleepiness scale score decreased significantly from 12.4 +/- 6.0 before treatment to 10.2 +/- 6.6 after 3 months of treatment and 7.8 +/- 3.8 after 1 year of treatment (p < 0.001 for both). The mean EF improved significantly from 1.77 +/- 0.4 before treatment to 2.1 +/- 0.4 after 3 months of treatment (p < 0.05) and 2.0 +/- 0.3 after 1 year of treatment (p = 0.055), which were similar to the values of the reference group. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS) levels decreased from 18.8 +/- 6.2 nmol malondialdehyde (MDA)/mL before treatment to 15.8 +/- 3.9 MDA/mL after 3 months of treatment (p = 0.09) and 15.5 +/- 3.2 nmol MDA/mL after 1 year of treatment (p < 0.05). There was a correlation between the improvement in AHI and in EF or TBARS levels (r = 0.55; p = 0.05). The untreated control group remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The Herbst MAS may be a moderately effective long-term treatment for patients with OSA. EF improved to levels that were not significantly different than reference levels, even though apneic events were not completely eliminated. We think that these data are encouraging and that they justify the performance of larger randomized controlled studies.     

Obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes: interacting epidemics

Type 2 diabetes is a major public health concern with high morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. Recent reports have indicated that the majority of patients with type 2 diabetes also have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There is compelling evidence that OSA is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Rapidly accumulating data from both epidemiologic and clinical studies suggest that OSA is also independently associated with alterations in glucose metabolism and places patients at an increased risk of the development of type 2 diabetes. Experimental studies in humans and animals have demonstrated that intermittent hypoxia and reduced sleep duration due to sleep fragmentation, as occur in OSA, exert adverse effects on glucose metabolism. Based on the current evidence, clinicians need to address the risk of OSA in patients with type 2 diabetes and, conversely, evaluate the presence of type 2 diabetes in patients with OSA. Clearly, there is a need for further research, using well-designed studies and long-term follow-up, to fully demonstrate a causal role for OSA in the development and severity of type 2 diabetes. In particular, future studies must carefully consider the confounding effects of central obesity in examining the link between OSA and alterations in glucose metabolism. The interactions among the rising epidemics of obesity, OSA, and type 2 diabetes are likely to be complex and involve multiple pathways. A better understanding of the relationship between OSA and type 2 diabetes may have important public health implications.     

Plasma aldosterone is related to severity of obstructive sleep apnea in subjects with resistant hypertension

OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and primary aldosteronism are common in subjects with resistant hypertension; it is unknown, however, if the two disorders are causally related. This study relates plasma aldosterone and renin levels to OSA severity in subjects with resistant hypertension, and in those with equally severe OSA but without resistant hypertension serving as control subjects. METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive subjects referred to the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) for resistant hypertension (BP uncontrolled on three medications) and 29 control subjects referred to UAB Sleep Disorders Center for suspected OSA were prospectively evaluated by an early morning plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and renin level, and by overnight, attended polysomnography. RESULTS: OSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] > or = 5/h) was present in 85% of subjects with resistant hypertension. In these subjects, PAC correlated with AHI (rho = 0.44, p = 0.0002) but not renin concentration. Median PAC was significantly lower in control subjects compared to subjects with resistant hypertension (5.5 ng/dL vs 11.0 ng/dL, p < 0.05) and not related to AHI. In male subjects compared to female subjects with resistant hypertension, OSA was more common (90% vs 77%) and more severe (median AHI, 20.8/h vs 10.8/h; p = 0.01), and median PAC was significantly higher (12.0 ng/dL vs 8.8 ng/dL, p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: OSA is extremely common in subjects with resistant hypertension. A significant correlation between PAC and OSA severity is observed in subjects with resistant hypertension but not in control subjects. While cause and effect cannot be inferred, the data suggest that aldosterone excess may contribute to OSA severity.     

Predictors of survival in COPD patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure receiving noninvasive home ventilation

BACKGROUND: Patients with COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure (CHRF) are at high risk, and noninvasive ventilation at home is increasingly being used. Knowledge of prognostic parameters under these conditions is limited but may be clinically helpful and highlight the role of noninvasive ventilation. METHODS: In 188 patients with COPD (mean +/- SD FEV1, 31.0 +/- 9.6% of predicted; PaCo2, 56.3 +/- 9.4 mm Hg) discharged from the hospital receiving NIV between July 1994 and July 2004, the prognostic value of body mass index (BMI), lung function, laboratory parameters, and blood gas levels was assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Moreover, the impact of changes in risk factors on mortality assessed 6.7 +/- 2.8 months after the initiation of noninvasive ventilation was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, the mortality rate during follow-up (duration, 32.2 +/- 24.3 months) was 44.7%, with 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year survival rates of 84.0%, 65.3%, and 26.4%. Deaths resulted predominantly from respiratory causes (73.8%). Univariate regression analyses revealed age, BMI, hemoglobin, FEV1, specific airway resistance, residual volume (RV)/total lung capacity (TLC), pH, and base excess (BE) to be associated with prognosis (p < 0.01 each), whereas multivariate analysis identified only age, BMI, RV/TLC, and BE as independent predictors (p < 0.05). In patients at risk (BMI < 25 km/m2, RV/TLC >or= 73%, or BE >or= 9 mmol/L), changes in these predictors were also associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COPD and CHRF, nutritional status, hyperinflation, and BE, which turned out to be reliable and consistent markers in CHRF, were independent prognostic factors for mortality. These data favor a multidimensional approach in these patients, including the use of noninvasive ventilation.