Comparison between methotrexate and azathioprine in the treatment of chronic active Crohn’s disease: a randomised, investigator-blind study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of azathioprine in the treatment of chronic active Crohn's disease is well established. However, this drug has a long onset of action. Methotrexate has also been shown to be effective in chronic active Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in comparison with azathioprine, and to establish whether methotrexate has a shorter onset of action in this setting. METHODS: Patients with chronic active Crohn's disease were admitted to this investigator-blind study. Chronicity was defined as the need for steroid therapy of > or = 10 mg/day for at least 4 months during the preceding 12 months, with at least one attempt to discontinue treatment. The disease had to be clinically active at entry, with a Crohn's Disease Activity Index of > or = 200. Six patients treated with azathioprine and methotrexate, respectively, were found to have enterocutaneous and perianal fistulas. At entry, all patients received prednisolone (40 mg once a day) which was tapered over a period of 12 weeks unless their clinical condition deteriorated. All patients were randomised to receive i.v. methotrexate 25 mg/week, or oral azathioprine 2 mg/kg per day, for a 6-month follow-up period. After the first 3 months, methotrexate was switched to oral administration maintaining the same dose. The primary efficacy outcome considered was the proportion of patients entering first remission after 3 and 6 months of therapy. Clinical remission was defined as the lack of need for steroid treatment and a Crohn's Disease Activity Index score of < or = 150 points at each scheduled visit. RESULTS: In the 54 patients (26 F, 28 M, mean age 34 years, range 18-60) randomly assigned to methotrexate (n=27) or azathioprine (n=27), no statistically significant difference was found between the two treatment regimens with respect to remission rate after 3 (methotrexate 44%, azathioprine 33%, p=0.28, (95% CI, 0.369-0.147), and 6 months (methotrexate 56%, azathioprine 63%, p=0.39, 95% CI, 0.187-0.335), respectively. Six patients withdrew from therapy due to adverse events: 3/27 (11%) in methotrexate and 3/27 (11%) in azathioprine. Drug-related adverse events (asthenia, nausea and vomiting) that did not require withdrawal from therapy were more frequent in the methotrexate group (azathioprine: 2/27 (7%); methotrexate: 12/27 (44%), p=0.00009). The frequency of these adverse events was comparable during the intravenous or oral administration of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that methotrexate is effective in inducing remission in patients with chronic active Crohn's disease, therapeutic efficacy being comparable, but not faster, than that of azathioprine.     

Better efficacy of methotrexate given by intramuscular injection than orally in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of methotrexate and tolerance to the drug in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were switched from intramuscular to oral administration because of a shortage of the intramuscular preparation. METHODS: 143 patients were switched from intramuscular to oral methotrexate. Of these, 47 were switched back to the intramuscular form. A multiple choice questionnaire was sent by mail to evaluate clinical and biological criteria of efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS: When methotrexate was first switched from intramuscular to oral administration, increased disease activity, exacerbation of morning pain and hand stiffness, duration of morning stiffness, increased joint pain, and increased joint swelling were observed. There was a greater frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms, but without a significant increase in liver abnormalities. When intramuscular methotrexate became available again, 47 of the 143 patients were switched back and were followed for at least three months. On average, disease manifestations were improved and side effects reduced by the switch. CONCLUSIONS: Methotrexate given intramuscularly had improved clinical efficacy with fewer side effects than given orally. Intramuscular methotrexate administration should be considered when rheumatoid arthritis remains active in spite of high dose oral methotrexate.     

Etanercept added to background methotrexate therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: continued observations

OBJECTIVE: To observe the long-term safety and efficacy of combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to determine whether the addition of etanercept allowed reductions in methotrexate or corticosteroid dosages while maintaining a clinical response. METHODS: Patients with RA who received methotrexate plus etanercept in a previous randomized, placebo-controlled trial were offered the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension study for further evaluation of treatment with etanercept and methotrexate. RESULTS: Seventy-nine of the 89 patients in the original blinded study enrolled in the extension study, and 65 of these patients continue in the study. Patients have received etanercept therapy for up to 47 months (median 44 months). The types and rate of adverse events noted during the extension trial were similar to those observed in the controlled trial. At the 3-year assessment, 77% of the 57 patients available for evaluation met American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) criteria for improvement in RA, 47% met the ACR50 criteria, and 23% met the ACR70 criteria. Of the 36 patients assessed at 3 years in the extension study, 30 (83%) were able to decrease their dosages of corticosteroids, and 20 (56%) were able to discontinue corticosteroid therapy. At 3 years, the dosage of methotrexate was decreased in 41 of 66 patients (62%), and methotrexate therapy was discontinued in 19 patients (29%). CONCLUSION: In this observational continuation study, the addition of etanercept to background methotrexate provided sustained clinical benefit over a median period of 44 months. With etanercept therapy, there were trends toward dosage reduction or discontinuation of methotrexate and corticosteroids, without apparent worsening of ACR response rates. Compared with the controlled trial, no increases in the rate of adverse events were observed.     

Long-term prospective trial of low-dose methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

Twenty-six patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis who had completed a randomized crossover trial of methotrexate elected to continue to receive the drug in a long-term prospective study. At 36 months, 16 patients remained in the study. Over this period of time, significant improvement was noted in the number of painful and swollen joints, physician and patient global assessments, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and prednisone dose. Adverse reactions occurred in 16 patients (62%), including nausea, alopecia, headache, stomatitis, herpes zoster, and diarrhea. Mild leukopenia (3 patients), thrombocytopenia (3 patients), and elevated transaminase levels (8 patients) resolved with temporary drug discontinuation. No patient withdrew due to drug toxicity. Liver biopsy specimens in 17 patients after 24 months of treatment showed no evidence of fibrosis or cirrhosis. A significant increase in the percentage of T3 and T4 blood cells and increases in lymphocyte proliferation to concanavalin A and purified protein derivative of tuberculin were found after 2 years of therapy. Our findings indicate that methotrexate has remained effective over 36 months of therapy, with acceptable toxicity levels and no evidence of systemic immunosuppression.     

Clinical impact of switching from infliximab to etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

We assessed the disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after switching from infliximab to etanercept according to the reason of infliximab discontinuation. At Helsinki University Central Hospital during the period 1999 to 2003, 49 patients with RA were switched from infliximab to etanercept. The reasons for infliximab discontinuation were: 42% for failure to respond by >American College of Rheumatology 50% criteria; 12% for adverse events; 46% responded to infliximab and were switched for non-medical reasons. Clinical outcome after the switch was compared between the groups according to the reason of infliximab discontinuation. Disease activity was measured with the 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS28). In patients in the non-medical reasons group, the disease activity was suppressed effectively both during infliximab and etanercept. Furthermore, the one-year drug survival of etanercept in this group was the highest of 77% (95% confidence interval (CI), 62 to 97) among the three groups. In patients in the infliximab failure and adverse event groups, DAS28 values improved significantly during etanercept therapy. The 1-year drug survival of etanercept was 43% (95% CI, 26 to 70) and 50% (95% CI, 33 to 100), respectively. For RA patients who discontinued taking infliximab because of non-medical reasons experienced similar treatment efficacy during both biological agents. The treatment with etanercept provided sufficient disease control also for patients with infliximab failure or adverse event. Therefore, etanercept can be suggested when infliximab has failed or discontinued for other reasons.     

Methotrexate following unsuccessful thiopurine therapy in pediatric Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND: The thiopurines, azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, are traditional first-line immunomodulatory agents in adult and pediatric Crohn's disease, but the comparative efficacy and safety of methotrexate have seldom been examined. We report outcomes with methotrexate treatment in pediatric patients previously refractory to or intolerant of thiopurines. METHODS: In a four-center, retrospective cohort study, efficacy of methotrexate in maintaining remission was assessed by PCDAI measurements, steroid use, and height velocity. Patients served as their own historical controls. Multivariable analysis controlled for route of methotrexate administration, reason for thiopurine discontinuation, baseline disease activity, and disease duration. RESULTS: Forty-two percent of 60 children treated with methotrexate were in clinical remission without steroids at both 6 and 12 months. A strong steroid sparing effect was observed compared with the year prior to methotrexate (P<0.001). Success rates were similar in previously thiopurine-intolerant and refractory patients. Height velocity increased from -1.9 SDS to -0.14 SDS (P=0.004) in the year following therapy. In a median 3-yr follow-up, a third of the patients did not require escalation of therapy; the others required step-up therapy with infliximab or surgery. Eight children (13%) stopped methotrexate due to adverse events, including, most commonly, elevated liver enzymes, and one serious episode of sepsis. CONCLUSION: Methotrexate appears effective in maintaining remission in pediatric Crohn's disease, when thiopurines have failed. Consideration should be given to its use earlier in pediatric treatment algorithms.     

Prospective six year follow up of patients withdrawn from a randomised study comparing parenteral gold salt and methotrexate

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the impression of a better outcome of patients withdrawn from parenteral gold salt therapy compared with those withdrawn from methotrexate. METHODS: Patients with early, active, and erosive RA were randomised for a double blind trial to receive either weekly 15 mg intramuscular methotrexate or 50 mg goldsodiumthiomalate. If the drug had to be withdrawn because of side effects treatment was continued with the other drug in still active disease. Patients with insufficient response were treated with a combination of both drugs. All patients were followed up by an extended clinical and radiographic evaluation. RESULTS: 64 patients each were allocated to methotrexate and gold treatment. After 72 months a complete record was available for 88% of patients. Within the first 36 months 38 patients withdrew from gold treatment (95% because of side effects) and 23 patients withdrew from methotrexate (57% because of side effects). A significant 40% to 70% improvement of all parameters (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C reactive protein, swollen and tender joints, radiological progression) compared with baseline was observed in patients completing their randomised treatment with gold or methotrexate. The same improvement over three years was seen in patients who withdrew from gold treatment, while patients withdrawing from methotrexate experienced a deterioration of their disease. CONCLUSION: Withdrawals represent the majority of patients in long term drug trials. Patients with early RA stopping gold because of side effects show almost the same sustained improvement as patients continuing gold or methotrexate. Patients withdrawn from methotrexate experience a reactivation of their disease.     

Combined treatment of giant-cell arteritis with methotrexate and prednisone. a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids remain the cornerstone of therapy for giant-cell arteritis, but relapse during dose tapering and corticosteroid-related adverse events often complicate management of this condition. Although several approaches, including combined therapy with cytotoxic agents, have been suggested to overcome these problems, no study has clearly shown benefits of alternate treatments. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the safety and efficacy of combined therapy with corticosteroids and methotrexate in giant-cell arteritis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: University-based clinic. PATIENTS: 42 patients with new-onset giant-cell arteritis according to biopsy. INTERVENTION: High initial doses of corticosteroid were given; the dose was then tapered quickly until therapy was completely withdrawn. Methotrexate or placebo was given weekly from the start of corticosteroid therapy for 24 months. MEASUREMENTS: Number of relapses, cumulative dose of corticosteroid, and number of adverse events were assessed on completion of follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with combined prednisone and placebo therapy, treatment with prednisone and methotrexate reduced the proportion of patients who experienced at least one relapse (45% vs. 84.2%; P = 0.02) and the proportion of patients who experienced multiple relapses (P = 0.004). The mean cumulative dose of prednisone was 4187 +/- 1529 mg in the methotrexate group and 5489.5 +/- 1396 mg in the placebo group (mean difference, 1302 mg [95% CI, 350 to 2253 mg]; P = 0.009). Overall, the rate and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. Treatment was discontinued in 3 patients in the methotrexate group who experienced definite drug-related adverse events. In sensitivity analysis that included patients lost to follow-up, differences between groups in number of relapses and cumulative dose of prednisone were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with methotrexate plus corticosteroid is a safe alternative to corticosteroid therapy alone in patients with giant-cell arteritis and is more effective in controlling disease.     

Step-down approach using either cyclosporin A or methotrexate as maintenance therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and outcome of the step-down approach using either cyclosporin A (CSA) or methotrexate (MTX) as maintenance therapy following 6 months treatment with these 2 agents in combination in early, nonerosive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Fifty-seven patients younger than 65 years with early, nonerosive RA were first treated with CSA and MTX in combination for 6 months. They were then randomly stepped down to single-agent maintenance treatment for another 18 months. Safety, clinical efficacy, survival on treatment, and radiographic progression were evaluated. RESULTS: When being treated with combination therapy, 7 of the 57 patients (12.3%) withdrew because of adverse events. Of the remaining 50 patients, 42 (84.0%) were American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% responders, 30 (60.0%) were ACR 50% responders, and 23 (46.0%) were ACR 70% responders. At month 6, 22 patients were randomized to CSA and 27 to MTX. During this trial period, the treatment was discontinued by 16 patients taking CSA (mainly because of loss of efficacy) and by 4 taking MTX. At month 24, the probability (+/- SEM) of survival on treatment was 0.273 +/- 0.09 for CSA and 0.852 +/- 0.07 for MTX. Of the 6 CSA patients who completed the trial, 4 (66.7%) were ACR 20% responders, and 3 (50%) were both ACR 50% and ACR 70% responders. Of the 23 completers in the MTX arm, 21 (91.3%) were ACR 20% responders, 18 (78.3%) were ACR 50%, and 10 (43.5%) were ACR 70% responders. The treatment was not responsible for severe adverse events. Radiography showed a slow progression in the damage score and number of eroded joints in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Stepping down to single agent maintenance therapy following 6 months of combination treatment with CSA and MTX in early RA was only successful with MTX. Because this treatment did not prevent some radiographic progression, other approaches (e.g., step-up approach) may be more appropriate in early RA.     

Low-dose methotrexate treatment of rheumatoid arthritis; Long-term observation of efficacy and safety

Summary Forty-one patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were treated with a weekly low-dose of methotrexate for a mean period of 32 months (range, 5–81 months) and were given a mean total dose of 954 mg (range, 145–2000 mg). Eighty-three percent of the patients improved. Of these 39% (16 patients) had a complete clinical remission and 17% (7 patients) showed marked improvement, 27% (11 patients) showed moderate improvement and 17% (7 patients) were unchanged. Patients responding to methotrexate therapy maintained the improvement as long as the therapy continued, unless severe infections occurred. Seven patients withdrew during the study including two, who died of myocardial infarction. Methotrexate was withdrawn because of adverse drug reactions in two patients, fear of toxicity in two and for administrative reasons in one patient. Adverse reactions developed in 25 patients (61%). In all but two cases these reactions were mild and reversible. Pancytopenia, a major side effect, was present in two patients: in one patient in association with pneumonia and in the other patient associated with an acute infectious enteritis (after three years treatment in the first and six years in the second patient);both recovered when methotrexate was discontinued. Age, sex, duration of treatment did not remarkably influence the outcome of therapy or the occurrence of adverse reactions.     

Five year clinical evaluation of treatment efficacy with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of this study was to determine long term efficacy and safety of low dose methotrexate (MTX) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Thirty patients receiving MTX for RA were prospectively studied over a mean treatment period of 60 months. Standard clinical and laboratory measures of disease activity were assessed by the same investigator at baseline, and at 3, 6, 24, and 60 months. The occurrence of adverse reactions was noted. Initially MTX was given orally 7.5 mg once a week. In the course of the observation the dose ranged between 5 and 15 mg/week. 13 patients (43%) completed 5-years study. Treatment with MTX was stopped due to adverse events in 4 cases, inefficacy in 7 patients, poor compliance and fear of toxicity in 3 patients and death in 3 patients. The factors related to their death were unrelated in all 3 cases to study MTX therapy. In 13 patients who completed 60 months of therapy, a significant improvement was noted comparing to baseline in 9 out of 12 clinical disease variables and acute phase reactants. There was also a significant decrease in the mean daily dosage of NSAIDs. Adverse events occurred in 64% of the patients, but only 13% of the patients discontinued MTX permanently. The side effects occurred more often in older patients. RA patients treated for five years with MTX showed statistically significant clinical improvement and decrease of inflammation parameters. MTX treatment may be helpful also in patients with advanced forms of RA.     

A 48-week, randomized, double-blind, double-observer, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of combination methotrexate and intramuscular gold therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: results of the METGO study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding intramuscular (IM) gold to the treatment regimen of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have a suboptimal response to methotrexate (MTX). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, double-observer, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of 48 weeks was conducted. Sixty-five RA patients who had a suboptimal response to >/=12 weeks of MTX therapy were randomly assigned to receive weekly IM gold or placebo in addition to MTX. Gold was administered according to a standard protocol developed for the study. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who met the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria (achieved an ACR20 response) at week 48. Secondary outcomes included the percentages of patients achieving ACR50 and ACR70 responses, the individual criteria that make up the primary outcome, quality of life, direct and indirect health care costs, intraarticular steroid use, and adverse events, among other measures. Statistical analyses were based on an intent-to-treat strategy. RESULTS: Sixty-one percent of patients receiving gold achieved an ACR20 response compared with 30% of patients receiving placebo (chi(2) = 6.04, P = 0.014; logistic regression odds ratio 3.64 [95% confidence interval 1.3, 10.4], P = 0.016). Twenty-six percent of patients receiving gold achieved an ACR50 response compared with 4% of patients receiving placebo (P = 0.017), and 21% of patients receiving gold achieved an ACR70 response compared with 0% of patients receiving placebo (P = 0.011). From both clinical and cost-effectiveness perspectives, gold was the preferred and dominant strategy. Study treatment was discontinued in 23 patients (14 in the placebo group compared with 9 in the gold group; P = 0.022) due to loss to followup, adverse events, or lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: In RA patients with a suboptimal response to MTX, adding weekly IM gold causes significant clinical improvement. Adverse events were minor, and IM gold-related adverse events led to discontinuation in only 11% of the gold group over 48 weeks.     

Long-term methotrexate (MTX) combination therapy versus MTX alone for active rheumatoid arthritis

In 37 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) responding insufficiently to a diseasemodifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), we compared the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) used alone (MTX-only group) with MTX used in combination (combined-treatment group). Patients were assigned randomly to 5 years of treatment with MTX alone (initial dose, 7.5 mg/week) or with MTX (initial dose, 5 mg/week) plus their previous DMARD continued at half dosage. After 3 years of therapy, the combined-treatment group showed significantly better sustained response of the Lansbury index, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein than the MTX-only group. Ten patients withdrew because of adverse drug effects, with a somewhat higher frequency in the combined-treatment group (six of 19, 32%) than in the MTX-only group (four of 18,22%) difference not significant). One patient in each group withdrew because of insufficient response to therapy. We found that combining the original drug with MTX in previously intractable RA cases resulted in at least additive efficacy.     

Efficacy of Vitamin D in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate therapy

To determine the efficacy of oral vitamin D [25(OH)D] in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are in methotrexate (MTX) therapy, patients receiving stable doses of MTX were randomized to one of two dose groups and received 12?weeks of double-blind vitamin D[25(OH)D] (50,000?IU per week) or matching placebo. The moderate and major efficacy measure was the proportion of patients with >0.6 and >1.2 improvement in RA based on the Disease Activity Score 28(DAS 28) at 12?weeks. Safety measures included adverse events and laboratory assessments. On a background of MTX, the percentage of patients with a moderate/major DAS 28 response at week 12 in the vitamin D groups (76/44%) was not significantly different from placebo (64.6/33.4%). Adverse events were typically mild and included small hepatic enzyme elevation; we did not have any undesirable events resulting in discontinuation of study drug. In patients with active RA receiving stable doses of MTX, vitamin D showed non-significant improvement in efficacy outcomes compared to placebo.     

A randomized controlled trial of parenteral methotrexate compared with sodium aurothiomalate (Myochrysine) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis

Forty patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled in a double blind study of 26 weeks duration designed to compare the efficacy and safety of parenteral methotrexate and sodium aurothiomalate (GSTM) in the treatment of RA. All the patients had active RA and none had previously received gold, D-penicillamine or immunosuppressive therapy. Patients were randomized to receive weekly intramuscular (IM) injections of either methotrexate 10 mg or GSTM 50 mg. Two patients taking methotrexate and 7 taking GSTM were withdrawn before 26 weeks. Methotrexate was as effective as GSTM as measured by numbers of swollen or tender joints, morning stiffness, grip strength, pain scale and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Five patients taking methotrexate and 11 taking GSTM presented side effects (p = 0.05). Total number of adverse reactions was 5 for the methotrexate group and 15 for the GSTM group (p less than 0.01). Our data suggest that low dose IM methotrexate is less toxic and as effective as GSTM for the treatment of RA during the first 6 months of therapy.     

Observational study on efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anakinra in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of anakinra, a recombinant human interleukin 1 (IL1) receptor antagonist used in rheumatoid arthritis, has been documented in five randomised controlled studies. However, long term post-marketing efficacy data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and drug survival of anakinra in clinical practice. METHODS: All patients with rheumatoid arthritis who started anakinra in six hospitals between May 2002 and February 2004 were included in a two year prospective, in part retrospective, cohort study. Efficacy was assessed using the 28 joint disease activity score (DAS28) and the EULAR response criteria. Safety was evaluated using the common toxicity criteria. Drug survival and prognostic factors were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: After three months, 55% of the patients (n = 146) showed a response (43% moderate, 12% good). A subset of patients continuing anakinra after 18 months had a sustained clinical response compared with patients who switched to other disease modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (DAS28 improvement, 2.46 v 1.79). Drug survival was 78%, 54%, and 14% after three, six, and 24 months, respectively. The reason for discontinuation was lack of efficacy in 78% and adverse events in 22%. Except for higher drug survival in women (odds ratio = 0.51, 95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.97), no prognostic factors were found. Adverse events were reported 206 times in 111 patients, the most common being injection site reactions (36%). Serious adverse events occurred in 12% of the patients, with one classified as related. CONCLUSIONS: The short term efficacy and safety profile of anakinra are comparable to those found in randomised clinical studies. However, the drug survival of anakinra after two years is low, mostly because of lack of efficacy.     

High dose intravenous methotrexate for refractory rheumatoid arthritis.

Eight patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were given high dose intravenous methotrexate (MTX) (500 mg/m2) followed by oral leucovorin every 2 weeks for up to 6 months. All patients enrolled had previously failed conventional MTX therapy. Five patients completed 6 months of therapy. Three withdrew early, one due to inefficacy, one due to gastrointestinal intolerance and one due to sciatica requiring hospital admission. Fifty percent or greater improvements were seen in 5 of 8 clinical variables in those patients who completed 6 months of therapy. Six of 8 improvements achieved statistical significance at 24 weeks. Upon discontinuing therapy, patients flared within 8 to 12 weeks. Those who were maintained by low dose MTX after the high dose protocol were able to sustain their improvement throughout the subsequent 6 months of followup.     

Efficacy and safety of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients who failed to achieve a treatment-free remission period after imatinib discontinuation: Results of the French Nilo post-STIM study

Molecular recurrence (MRec) occurs in about half of all patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) who discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in sustained deep molecular response. A second TKI discontinuation has been attempted in some patients who regain the discontinuation criteria after resuming treatment. Nilotinib treatment affords faster and deeper molecular responses than imatinib as first-line therapy. We prospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of nilotinib (300 mg twice daily) in chronic-phase CML patients who experienced MRec, after imatinib discontinuation and analysed the probability of TFR after a new attempt in patients treated for 2 years with sustained MR^4.5 for at least 1 year. A total of 31 patients were included in the study between 2013 and 2018. Seven (23%) patients experienced serious adverse events after a median of 2 months of nilotinib treatment leading to discontinuation of treatment. One patient was excluded from the study for convenience. Among the 23 patients treated for 2 years with nilotinib, 22 maintained their molecular response for at least 1 year (median: 22 months) and stopped nilotinib. The TFR rates at 24 and 48 months after nilotinib discontinuation were 59.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.7%–83.7%) and 42.1% (95% CI: 25%–71%) respectively (NCT #01774630).     

Combination therapy with methotrexate and cyclosporine A in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and cyclosporine A (CyA) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who were refractory to MTX as a single second-line agent. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive patients with JIA who had refractory polyarthritis despite a minimum of 6 months of MTX as a single second-line agent at the dose of 15 to 25 mg/m2/week were continued with MTX with the addition of CyA (4 mg/kg/day) for 6 to 30 months (median 10 months) were analyzed. The clinical response to therapy was assessed through the preliminary definition of improvement in JIA. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment, as compared to the time when CyA was added to MTX, 8 patients (47%) met the 30% definition of improvement; among them 5 (29%) met the 70% definition of improvement, and 2 (12%) achieved complete disease control. Seven patients (41%) experienced side effects: 4 gastrointestinal discomfort, 1 liver transaminase elevation, and 2 increase > or = 30% in the serum creatinine concentration. No patients was discontinued from combination therapy due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: In our JIA patients who were refractory to MTX as a single second-line agent, the addition of CyA was associated with a significant clinical improvement in roughly half of the patients.     

Second phase of a double-blind study clinical trial on Sibutramine for the treatment of patients suffering essential obesity: 6 months after treatment cross-over

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the weight gain after Sibutramine 10 mg daily discontinuation. To evaluate the effect of Sibutramine 10 mg daily in patients who were on a diet for 6 months. DESIGN: After a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, prospective phase for 6 months, the treatments were crossed over and the patients continued in double-blind observation for another 6-month period. SUBJECTS: Forty out of 44 patients who were on Sibutramine and 42/44 who were on placebo switched the trial medication. All the patients were obese at the beginning of the trial (body mass index, BMI>30 kg/m(2)). During the first phase, the weight loss in the Sibutramine group was 7.52 kg (95% confidence intervals (95% CI) 6.15; 8.9) and that in the placebo group 3.56 kg (95% CI 2.41; 4.7) (using last observation carried forward (LOCF)). MEASUREMENTS: Body weight, BMI, waist, medical history, assessment of hunger, satiety and diet compliance, standard laboratory assessments, blood pressure, heart rate and ECG. RESULTS: Thirty out 40 patients in the Sibutramine/placebo (S/P) group and 32 out of 42 in the placebo/Sibutramine (P/S) group completed the second phase of the trial. During the second part of the trial the S/P gained 3.21 (95% CI 2.15; 4.26) kg, 1.21 (0.82; 1.59) kg/m(2), and 2.83 (1.55; 4.12) waist cm. The P/S group lost 1.62 (2.62; 0.61), 0.67 (1.09; -0.25) kg/m(2), and 1.85 (3.18; 0.53) waist cm. Eleven patients in the S/P group suffered 14 adverse events, mainly blood pressure increase (n=4); 19 patients in the P/S group had 29 adverse events, mainly dry mouth (n=8), constipation (n=5) and blood pressure increase (n=4). Only one P/S patient withdrew because of an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: After Sibutramine discontinuation patients had weight gain but they did not reach the baseline body weight. No significant adverse events presented after Sibutramine discontinuation. When Sibutramine was administrated to patients after 6 months of diet, the weight plateau was broken. Early Sibutramine administration had better effects than late post-diet administration. Sibutramine was well tolerated by the patients.