Federal Nursing Home Policies on Antipsychotics had Similar Impacts by Race and Ethnicity for Residents With Dementia

ObjectivesFederal initiatives have been successful in reducing antipsychotic exposure in nursing home residents with dementia. We assessed if these initiatives were implemented equally across racial and ethnic minority groups.DesignRetrospective, cross-sectional trends study.Setting and ParticipantsNational long-stay nursing home residents with dementia from 2011 to 2017.MethodsWe examined trends in psychotropic drug class exposures from the Minimum Data Set assessments for non-Hispanic Black (NHB), Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White (NHW) residents using interrupted time-series analyses with age-sex standardized quarterly outcomes and time points to denote the National Partnership (2012) and Five Star Rating changes (2015).ResultsInitially, antipsychotic (33.0%) and sedative (6.8%) exposure was highest for Hispanic residents; antidepressant (59.8%) and anxiolytic (23.4%) exposure was highest for NHW residents; NHB residents had the lowest use of each. Antipsychotic use dropped at the time of the Partnership (β = −0.8807, P = .0023) and the slope declined further after the Partnership (β = −0.6611, P < .0001) for NHW. In comparison to NHW, the level and slope changes for NHB and Hispanics were not significantly different. The Five Star Rating change did not impact the level of antipsychotic use (β = 0.027, P = .9467), but the slope changed to indicate a slowed rate of decline (β = 0.1317, P = .4075) for NHW. As to the other psychotropic drug classes, there were few significant differences between trends seen in the racial and ethnic subgroups. The following exceptions were noted: antidepressant use decreased at a faster rate for NHB residents post-Partnership (β = −0.1485, P = .0371), and after the Five Star Rating change, NHB residents (β = −0.0428, P = .0312) and Hispanic residents (β = −0.0834, P < .0001) saw antidepressant use decrease faster than NHW. Sedative use in slope post-Partnership period (β = −0.086, P = .0275) and post–Five Star Rating (β = −0.0775, P < .0001) declined faster among Hispanic residents.Conclusions and ImplicationsWe found little evidence of clinically meaningful differences in changes to 4 classes of psychotropic medication use among racial and ethnic minority nursing home residents with dementia following 2 major federal initiatives.     

Testing the Implementation of Function-focused Care in Assisted Living Settings

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the Function-Focused Care for Assisted Living Using the Evidence Integration Triangle (FFC-AL-EIT) intervention.DesignFFC-AL-EIT was a randomized controlled pragmatic trial including 85 sites and 794 residents.InterventionFFC-AL-EIT was implemented by a Research Nurse Facilitator working with a facility champion and stakeholder team for 12 months to increase function and physical activity among residents. FFC-AL-EIT included (Step I) Environment and Policy Assessments; (Step II) Education; (Step III) Establishing Resident Function-Focused Care Service Plans; and (Step IV) Mentoring and Motivating.Setting and ParticipantsThe age of participants was 89.48 years [standard deviation (SD) = 7.43], and the majority were female (n = 561; 71%) and white (n = 771; 97%).MethodsResident measures, obtained at baseline, 4, and 12 months, included function, physical activity, and performance of function-focused care. Setting outcomes, obtained at baseline and 12 months, included environment and policy assessments and service plans.ResultsReach was based on 85 of 90 sites that volunteered (94%) participating. Effectiveness was based on less decline in function (P < .001), more function-focused care (P = .012) and better environment (P = .032) and policy (P = .003) support for function-focused care in treatment sites. Adoption was supported with 10.00 (SD = 2.00) monthly meetings held, 77% of settings engaged in study activities as or more than expected, and direct care workers providing function-focused care (63% to 68% at 4 months and 90% at 12 months). The intervention was implemented as intended, and education was received based on a mean knowledge test score of 88% correct. Evidence of maintenance from 12 to 18 months was noted in treatment site environments (P = .35) and policies continuing to support function-focused care (P = .28)].Conclusions and ImplicationsThe Evidence Integration Triangle is an effective implementation approach for assisted living. Future work should continue to consider innovative approaches for measuring RE-AIM outcomes.     

Changes in Long-Term Care Markets: Assisted Living Supply and the Prevalence of Low-Care Residents in Nursing Homes

ObjectivesTo assess the effect of changes in assisted living (AL) capacity within a market on prevalence of residents with low care needs in nursing homes.DesignRetrospective, longitudinal analysis of nursing home markets.Setting and participantsTwelve thousand two hundred fifity-one nursing homes in operation during 2007 and 2014.MeasurementsWe analyzed the percentage of residents in a nursing home who qualified as low-care. For each nursing home, we constructed a market consisting of AL communities, Medicare beneficiaries, and competing nursing homes within a 15-mile radius. We estimated the effect of change in AL beds on prevalence of low-care residents using multivariate linear models with year and nursing home fixed effects.ResultsThe supply of AL beds increased by an average 258 beds per nursing home market (standard deviation = 591) during the study period. The prevalence of low-care residents decreased from an average of 13.0% (median 10.5%) to 12.2% (median 9.5%). In adjusted models, a 100-bed increase in AL supply was associated with a decrease in low-care residents of 0.041 percentage points (P = .026), controlling for changes in market and nursing home characteristics, county demographics, and year and nursing home fixed effects. In markets with a high percentage of its Medicare beneficiaries (≥14%) dual eligible for Medicaid, the effect of AL is stronger, with a 0.066–percentage point decrease per 100 AL beds (P = .026) vs a 0.016–percentage point decrease in low-duals markets (P = .48).Conclusions and implicationsOur analysis suggests that some of the growth in AL capacity serves as a substitute for nursing homes for patients with low care needs. Furthermore, the effects are concentrated in markets with an above-average proportion of beneficiaries with dual Medicaid eligibility.     

Time Trends in Opioid Use by Dementia Severity in Long-Term Care Nursing Home Residents

ObjectiveCurrent information on opioid use in nursing home residents, particularly those with dementia, is unknown. We examined the temporal trends in opioid use by dementia severity and the association of dementia severity with opioid use in long-term care nursing home residents.DesignRepeated measures cross-sectional study.SettingLong-term care nursing homes.ParticipantsUsing 20% Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Medicare claims from 2011-2017, we included long-term care residents (n = 734,739) from each year who had 120 days of consecutive stay. In a secondary analysis, we included residents who had an emergency department visit for a fracture (n = 12,927).MeasurementsDementia was classified as no, mild, moderate, and severe based on the first MDS assessment each year. In the 120 days of nursing home stay, opioid use was measured as any, prolonged (>90 days), and high-dose (≥90 morphine milligram equivalent dose/day). For residents with a fracture, opioid use was measured within 7 days after emergency department discharge. Association of dementia severity with opioid use was evaluated using logistic regression.ResultsOverall, any opioid use declined by 8.5% (35.2% to 32.2%, P < .001), prolonged use by 5.0% (14.1% to 13.4%, P < .001), and high-dose by 21.4% (1.4% to 1.1%, P < .001) from 2011 to 2017. Opioid use declined across 4 dementia severity groups. Among residents with fracture, opioid use declined by 9% in mild, 9.5% in moderate, and 12.3% in severe dementia. The odds of receiving any, prolonged, and high-dose opioids decreased with increasing severity of dementia. For example, severe dementia reduced the odds of any [23.5% vs 47.6%; odds ratio (OR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.57], prolonged (9.8% vs 20.7%; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.71), and high-dose (1.0% vs 2.3%; OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63-0.74) opioids.Conclusions and ImplicationsUse of opioids declined in nursing home residents from 2011 to 2017, and the use was lower in residents with dementia, possibly reflecting suboptimal pain management in this population.     

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital Adaptation of the WHELD Person-Centered Nursing Home Training Program

ObjectiveDigital approaches to delivering person-centered care training to nursing home staff have the potential to enable widespread affordable implementation, but there is very limited evidence and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating digital training in the nursing home setting. The objective was to evaluate a digital person-centered care training intervention in a robust RCT.DesignWe conducted a 2-month cluster RCT in 16 nursing homes in the United Kingdom, randomized equally to receive a digitally adapted version of the WHELD person-centered care home training program with virtual coaching compared to the digital training program alone.Setting and ParticipantsThe study was conducted in UK nursing homes. There were 175 participants (45 nursing home staff and 130 residents with dementia).MethodsThe key outcomes were the well-being and quality of life (QoL) of residents with dementia and the attitudes and knowledge of nursing home staff.ResultsThere were significant benefits in well-being (t = 2.76, P = .007) and engagement in positive activities (t = 2.34, P = .02) for residents with dementia and in attitudes (t = 3.49, P = .001), including hope (t = 2.62, P = .013) and personhood (t = 2.26, P = .029), for staff in the group receiving digital eWHELD with virtual coaching compared to the group receiving digital learning alone. There was no improvement in staff knowledge about dementia.Conclusion and ImplicationsThe study provides encouraging initial clinical trial evidence that a digital version of the WHELD program supported by virtual coaching confers significant benefits for care staff and residents with dementia. Evidence-based digital interventions with remote coaching may also have particular utility in supporting institutional recovery of nursing homes from the COVID-19 pandemic.     

Prevalence of Spasticity in Nursing Home Residents

ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence, rate of underdiagnosis and undertreatment, and association with activities of daily living dependency of spasticity in a nursing home setting.DesignCross-sectional study.Setting and participantsThis study is an analysis of a deidentified data set generated by a prior quality improvement project at a 240-bed nursing home for residents receiving long-term care or skilled nursing care services.MethodsEach resident was examined by a movement disorders specialist neurologist to determine whether spasticity was present and, if so, the total number of spastic postures present in upper and lower limbs was recorded. Medical records, including the Minimum Data Set, were reviewed for neurologic diagnoses associated with spasticity, activities of daily living (ADL) dependency, and prior documentation of diagnosis and past or current treatments. Ordinary least squares linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between spasticity and ADL dependency.ResultsTwo hundred nine residents (154 women, 81.9 ± 10.9 years) were included in this analysis. Spasticity was present in 22% (45/209) of residents examined by the neurologist. Only 11% of residents (5/45) had a prior diagnosis of spasticity and were receiving treatment. Presence of spasticity was associated with greater ADL dependency (χ² = 51.72, P < .001), which was driven by lower limb spasticity (χ² = 14.56, P = .006).Conclusions and implicationsThese results suggest that spasticity (1) is common in nursing homes (1 of 5 residents), (2) is often not diagnosed or adequately treated, and (3) is associated with worse ADL dependency. Further research is needed to enhance the rates of diagnosis and treatment of spasticity in long-term care facilities.     

Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Resistance to Fluoroquinolones of Urinary Enterobacteriaceae Isolated From Nursing Home Residents: A Retrospective Cohort Study

ObjectivesThis study investigated the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program on fluoroquinolone (FLQ) resistance in urinary Enterobacteriaceae isolated from residents of 3 French nursing homes.DesignA multicentric retrospective before-and-after study was conducted.Setting and ParticipantsAll the first urinary Enterobacteriaceae isolates obtained from nursing home residents were included. Two time frames were analyzed: 2013-2015 and 2016-2017.MethodsThe antimicrobial stewardship program started in 2015 and was based on (1) 1-day training for use of an “antimicrobial stewardship kit for nursing homes;” and (2) daily support and training of the coordinating physician by an antibiotic mobile team (AMT) in 2 of 3 nursing homes.ResultsOverall, 338 urinary isolates were analyzed. Escherichia coli was the most frequent species (212/338, 63%). A significant reduction of resistance to ofloxacin was observed between 2013-2015 and 2016-2017 in general (Δ = −16%, P = .004) and among isolates obtained from patients hospitalized in the county nursing home with AMT support (Δ = −28%, P < .01). A nonstatistically significant reduction in ofloxacin resistance was also observed in the hospital nursing home with AMT support (Δ = −18%, P = .06).Conclusions and ImplicationsOur antimicrobial stewardship program resulted in a decrease in resistance to FLQ among urinary Enterobacteriaceae isolated from nursing home residents. The support of an AMT along with continuous training of the coordinating physician seems to be an important component to ensure efficacy of the intervention.     

Utilization by Long-Term Nursing Home Residents Under Accountable Care Organizations

ObjectivesNursing home care is common and costly. Accountable care organization (ACO) payment models, which have incentives for care that is better coordinated and less reliant on acute settings, have the potential to improve care for this high-cost population. We examined the association between ACO attribution status and utilization and Medicare spending among long-term nursing home residents and hypothesized that attribution of nursing home residents to an ACO will be associated with lower total spending and acute care use.DesignObservational propensity-matched study.Setting and ParticipantsMedicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who were long-term nursing home residents residing in areas with ≥5% ACO penetration.MethodsACO attribution and covariates used in propensity matching were measured in 2013 and outcomes were measured in 2014, including hospitalization (total and ambulatory care sensitive conditions), outpatient emergency department visits, and Medicare spending.ResultsNearly one-quarter (23.3%) of nursing home residents who survived into 2014 (n = 522,085, 76.1% of 2013 residents) were attributed to an ACO in 2013 in areas with ≥5% ACO penetration. After propensity score matching, ACO-attributed residents had significantly (P < .001) lower hospitalization rates per 1000 (total: 402.9 vs 419.9; ambulatory care sensitive conditions: 64.4 vs 71.4) and fewer outpatient ED visits (29.9 vs 33.3 per 100) but no difference in total spending ($14,071 vs $14,293 per resident, P = .058). Between 2013 and 2014, a sizeable proportion of residents’ attribution status switched (14.6%), either into or out of an ACO.Conclusions and ImplicationsACO nursing home residents had fewer hospitalizations and ED visits, but did not have significantly lower total Medicare spending. Among residents, attribution was not stable year over year.     

Short-term dietary supplementation with fructose accelerates gastric emptying of a fructose but not a glucose solution

ObjectiveShort-term dietary glucose supplementation has been shown to accelerate the gastric emptying rate of both glucose and fructose solutions. The aim of this study was to examine gastric emptying rate responses to monosaccharide ingestion following short-term dietary fructose supplementation.MethodsThe gastric emptying rate of a fructose solution containing 36 g of fructose and an equicaloric glucose solution containing 39.6 g glucose monohydrate were measured in 10 healthy non-smoking men with and without prior fructose supplementation (water control) using a randomized crossover design. Gastric emptying rate was assessed for a period of 1 h using the [¹³C]breath test with sample collections at baseline and 10-min intervals following drink ingestion. Additionally, appetite ratings of hunger, fullness, and prospective food consumption were recorded at baseline and every 10 min using visual analog scales.ResultsIncreased dietary fructose ingestion resulted in significantly accelerated half-emptying time of a fructose solution (mean = 48, SD = 6 versus 58, SD = 14 min control; P = 0.037), whereas the emptying of a glucose solution remained unchanged (mean = 85, SD = 31 versus 78, SD = 27 min control; P = 0.273). Time of maximal emptying rate of fructose was also significantly accelerated following increased dietary fructose intake (mean = 33, SD = 6 versus 38, SD = 9 min control; P = 0.042), while it remained unchanged for glucose (mean = 45, SD = 14 versus 44, SD = 14 min control; P = 0.757). No effects of supplementation were observed for appetite measures.ConclusionThree d of supplementation with 120 g/d of fructose resulted in an acceleration of gastric emptying rate of a fructose solution but not a glucose solution.     

Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3): Association Between Relationship-Centered Care Practices,and Number of Staff and Residents at Mealtimes in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes

ObjectivesTo determine if (1) number of staff or residents, when considering home-level factors and presence of family/volunteers, are associated with relationship-centered care practices at mealtimes in general and dementia care units in long-term care (LTC); and (2) the association between number of staff and relationship-centered care is moderated by number of residents and family/volunteers, profit status or chain affiliation.DesignSecondary analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3) cross-sectional multisite study.Setting and ParticipantsThirty-two Canadian LTC homes (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, and New Brunswick) and 639 residents were recruited. Eighty-two units were included, with 58 being general and 24 being dementia care units.MethodsTrained research coordinators completed the Mealtime Scan (MTS) for LTC at 4 to 6 mealtimes in each unit to determine number of staff, residents, and family or volunteers present. Relationship-centered care was assessed using the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist. The director of care or food services manager completed a home survey describing home sector and chain affiliation. Multivariable analyses were stratified by type of unit.ResultsIn general care units, the number of residents was negatively (P = .009), and number of staff positively (P < .001) associated with relationship-centered care (F_9,48 = 5.48, P < .001). For dementia care units, the associations were nonsignificant (F_5,18 = 2.74, P = .05). The association between staffing and relationship-centered care was not moderated by any variables in either general or dementia care units.Conclusion and ImplicationsNumber of staff in general care units may increase relationship-centered care at mealtimes in LTC. Number of residents or staff did not significantly affect relationship-centered care in dementia care units, suggesting that other factors such as additional training may better explain relationship-centered care in these units. Mandating minimum staffing and additional training at the federal level should be considered to ensure that staff have the capacity to deliver relationship-centered care at mealtimes, which is considered a best practice.     

Two European Examples of Acute Geriatric Units Located Outside of a General Hospital for Older Adults With Exacerbated Chronic Conditions

ObjectiveThroughout Europe, the number of older adults requiring acute hospitalization is increasing. Admission to an acute geriatric unit outside of a general hospital could be an alternative. In this model of acute medical care, comprehensive geriatric assessment and rehabilitation are provided to selected older patients. This study aims to compare patients' diagnoses, characteristics, and outcomes of 2 European sites where this care occurs.DesignExploratory cohort study.Setting and participantsSubacute Care Unit (SCU), introduced in 2012 in Barcelona, Spain, and the Acute Geriatric Community Hospital (AGCH), introduced in 2018 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The main admission criteria for older patients were acute events or exacerbations of chronic conditions, hemodynamic stability on admission, and no requirement for complex diagnostics.MeasuresWe compared setting, characteristics, and outcomes between patients admitted to the 2 units.ResultsData from 909 patients admitted to SCU and 174 to AGCH were available. Patients were admitted from the emergency department or from home. The mean age was 85.8 years [standard deviation (SD) = 6.7] at SCU and 81.9 years (SD = 8.5) (P < .001) at AGCH. At SCU, patients were more often delirious (38.7% vs 22.4%, P < .001) on admission. At both units, infection was the main admission diagnosis. Other diagnoses included heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Five percent or less of patients were readmitted to general hospitals. Average length of stay was 8.8 (SD = 4.4) days (SCU) and 9.9 (SD = 7.5) days (AGCH).Conclusions and ImplicationsThese acute geriatric units are quite similar and both provide an alternative to admission to a general hospital. We encourage the comparison of these units to other examples in Europe and suggest multicentric studies comparing their performance to usual hospital care.     

Clinical Characteristics,Frailty, and Mortality of Residents With COVID-19 in Nursing Homes of a Region of Madrid

ObjectivesTo describe the clinical characteristics, 30-day mortality, and associated factors of patients living in nursing homes (NH) with COVID-19, from March 20 to June 1, 2020.DesignThis is a retrospective study. A geriatric hospital-based team acted as a consultant and coordinated the care of older people living in NHs from the hospital.Setting and ParticipantsA total of 630 patients aged 70 and older with Coronavirus Disease 2019 COVID-19 living in 55 NHs.MethodsA logistic regression was performed to analyze the factors associated with mortality. In addition, Kaplan-Meier curves were applied according to mortality and its associated factors using the log-rank Mantel-Cox test.ResultsThe diagnosis of COVID-19 was mainly made by clinical compatibility (N = 430). Median age was 87 years, 64.6% were women and 45.9% were transferred to be cared for at the hospital. A total of 282 patients died (44.7%) within the 30 days of first attention by the team. A severe form of COVID-19 occurred in 473 patients, and the most frequent symptoms were dyspnea (n = 332) and altered level of consciousness (n = 301). According to multiple logistic regression, male sex (P = .019), the Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) ≥6 (P = .004), dementia (P = .012), dyspnea (P < .001), and having a severe form of COVID-19 (P = .001), were associated with mortality, whereas age and care setting were not.Conclusions and ImplicationsMortality of the residents living in NHs with COVID-19 was almost 45%. The altered level of consciousness as an atypical presentation of COVID-19 should be considered in this population. A severe form of the disease, present in more than three-quarters of patients, was associated with mortality, apart from the male sex, CFS ≥6, dementia, and dyspnea, whereas age and care setting were not. These findings may also help to recognize patients in which the Advance Care Planning process is especially urgent to assist in the decisions about their care.     

Why Women Sit: Determinants of Leisure Sitting Time for Working Women

BackgroundSedentary behavior is associated with negative health consequences independent of physical activity levels. Evidence suggests the work environment promotes sedentary behavior regardless of sector, and that employees with occupations requiring longer sitting times differ only marginally in leisure sitting time from those with more active occupations. Because physical activity opportunities may be limited across many work settings, leisure sedentary time may be more easily replaced with physical activity. Understanding correlates of leisure sedentary behaviors could inform interventions, specifically for women who are among the least active in America.MethodsFemale employees at two universities completed online surveys (n = 156; mean age, 45.12 [SD = 12.5]; mean BMI, 26.7 kg/m² [SD = 5.9]; mean work hours/week, 43.7 [SD = 9.4]). Bivariate correlations and two hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to examine personal and behavioral correlates of weekday and weekend leisure sitting time.FindingsFinal regression models revealed that greater weekday leisure sitting time (R² = 0.307) was related with being older (p = .006), having fewer children (p = .001), self-reporting poorer health (p = .006), and greater weekend sitting time (p < .001). Greater weekend leisure sitting time (R² = 0.261) was related with greater work-related sitting time (p = .020) and greater weekday leisure sitting time (p < .001). Physical activity was not related with weekday or weekend leisure sitting time.ConclusionsThe most prominent correlates of leisure sitting time were other types of sedentary behaviors. This suggests that sedentary time in one segment of life predicts time spent sitting in other areas of life. Future interventions should target decreasing sedentary behaviors during leisure time specifically, in addition to increasing physical activity behavior.     

Policy to Reduce Antipsychotic Use and Hospitalization of Nursing Home Residents With Dementia

ObjectivesFollowing the 2012 launch of the National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care in Nursing Homes (the National Partnership), the use of antipsychotics has declined. However, little is known about the impact of this effort on quality of care and outcomes for nursing home (NH) residents with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD). The objective of this study is to examine changes in hospitalizations for NH long-stay residents with ADRD after the launch of the National Partnership.DesignObservational cross-sectional study.Setting/ParticipantsNH residents who were newly admitted into NHs and became long-stay residents between January 2011 and March 2015 (n = 565,885).MethodsWe estimated linear probability models to explore the relationship between the National Partnership and the likelihood of NH-originated hospitalizations for NH long-stay residents with ADRD, accounting for facility fixed effect, individual covariates, and concurrent changes in hospitalizations among residents without ADRD. We further stratified the analysis by NHs according to their prevalence of antipsychotic use at baseline (ie, prior to the National Partnership).ResultsWe detected a 0.7–percentage point relative increase (P value <.01) in risk-adjusted probabilities of hospitalizations among residents with ADRD compared with non-ADRD residents in the post-Partnership period. In the stratified analysis, we detected a 1.2–percentage point increase (P = .037) in the probability of hospitalizations among ADRD residents in NHs with high antipsychotic use at baseline but no significant change among those in NHs with low antipsychotic use.Conclusions and ImplicationsAlthough the National Partnership may have reduced exposure to antipsychotics, our findings suggest this was related to an increase in hospitalization risk for residents with ADRD. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons behind the observed relationship and to examine the impact of the National Partnership on other health outcomes.     

Improvements in Antibiotic Appropriateness for Cystitis in Older Nursing Home Residents: A Quality Improvement Study With Randomized Assignment

ObjectiveTo determine the impact of an educational quality improvement initiative on the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing restricted to uncomplicated cystitis in older noncatheterized nursing home residents.DesignQuality improvement study with randomized assignment.Settings and ParticipantsTwenty-five nursing homes in United States were randomized to the intervention or usual care group by strata that included state, urban/rural status, bed size, and geographic separation.MethodsA 12-month trial of a low-intensity multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship intervention focused on uncomplicated cystitis in nursing home residents vs usual care. The outcome was the modified Medication Appropriateness Index as assessed by a blinded geriatric clinical pharmacist and consisted of an assessment of antibiotic effectiveness, dosage, drug-drug interactions, and duration.ResultsThere were 75 cases (0.15/1000 resident days) in intervention and 92 (0.22/1000 resident days) in control groups with a probable cystitis per consensus guidelines. Compared with controls, there was a statistically nonsignificant 21% reduction in the risk of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing (nonzero Medication Appropriateness Index score rate 0.13 vs 0.21/1000 person days; adjusted incident rate ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.45?1.38). There was a favorable comparison in inappropriateness of duration (77% vs 89% for intervention vs control groups, respectively; P = .0394). However, the intervention group had more problems with drug-drug interactions than the control group (8% vs 1%, respectively; P = .0463). Similarly, the intervention group had a nonsignificant trend toward more problems with dosage (primarily because of the lack of adjustment for decreased renal function) than the control group (32% vs 25%, respectively; P = .3170). Both groups had similar rates of problems with choice/effectiveness (44% vs 45%; P = .9417). The most common class of antibiotics prescribed inappropriately was quinolones (25% vs 23% for intervention versus control groups, respectively; P = .7057).Conclusions and ImplicationsA low-intensity intervention showed a trend toward improved appropriate antibiotic prescribing in nursing home residents with likely uncomplicated cystitis. Efforts to improve antibiotic prescribing in addition to the low-intensity intervention might include a consultant pharmacist in a nursing home to identify inappropriate prescribing practices.     

Community Discharge Among Post-Acute Nursing Home Residents: An Association With Patient Safety Culture?

ObjectivesWe examined whether better patient safety culture (PSC) in skilled nursing facilities was associated with higher likelihood of successful community discharge for post-acute care residents.DesignCross-sectional study.Setting and ParticipantsMedicare beneficiaries who were newly admitted for post-acute care (N = 53,929) to skilled nursing facilities participating in PSC survey (N = 818).MethodsFacility-level PSC scores were obtained from a national, random survey conducted in 2017. Survey data was linked to Minimum Dataset 3.0, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review, Master Beneficiary Summary File, Nursing Home Compare File, Payroll-Based Journal, and Areal Health Resources File. Successful discharge to community was the outcome of interest. Facility-level PSC scores were the key covariate. We controlled for individual-level, facility-level, and area-level characteristics. Separate logistic regression models for each of the 12 PSC domains and for the overall score were fit.ResultsPost-acute care residents who were successfully discharged to community were more likely to be female (63.7%), white (87.1%), Medicare-only (88.1%), cognitively intact (87.8%), and admitted following a surgery (40.9%) The multivariable analyses showed that teamwork (odds ratio 1.09, P = .02) and supervisor expectations and actions promoting resident safety (odds ratio 1.11, P = .01) were significantly associated with the increased likelihood of successful community discharge.Conclusions and ImplicationsThis is the first study to analyze the relationship between patient safety culture and successful discharge among post-acute care residents. Our results suggest that nursing home leaders may want to focus their quality and safety improvement efforts on specific PSC domains (eg, teamwork) as means for improving community discharge for post-acute care residents.     

Empatía médica en residentes y tutores de medicina familiar y comunitaria. La visión del profesional y del paciente

AimTo determine the degree of clinical empathy among family medicine residents and tutors. To gauge whether there is a relationship between physicians’ self-perceived empathy levels and their patients’ assessments.Study designObservational, cross-sectional survey.LocationPrimary Care Teaching Unit. Madrid.ParticipantsA survey was sent by email to all the Teaching Unit's family medicine tutors and residents. Responses were received from 50 residents (39.4%) and 41 tutors (45%). In addition, 428 patients were opportunistically recruited at a healthcare centre and their doctors were also interviewed.Primary measurement instrumentsEmpathy was measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy and the Jefferson Scale of Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy.ResultsThe tutors scored 2.53 points higher for cognitive empathy than the residents (P = .04). Emotional empathy scores declined among older tutors (r =  −0.32; P = .05). The Spanish students (82% of the total) without previous work experience scored higher for overall empathy (P = .02). Final-year residents recorded significantly worse empathy assessments than the other residents. A positive correlation (r = 0.72; P = .01) was observed between physicians’ self-perceived empathy and their patients’ perceptions.ConclusionsResidents with previous work experience, final-year residents and those of Latin American origin score lower for empathy. There is a strong relationship between physicians’ self-perceived empathy and their patients’ views of their empathy levels.     

The Association Between Quality of Care and Quality of Life in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents With Preserved Cognition

ObjectivesTo assess the overall quality of life of long-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition, to examine whether the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's Nursing Home Compare 5-star quality rating system reflects the overall quality of life of such residents, and to examine whether residents' demographics and clinical characteristics affect their quality of life.Design/measurementsQuality of life was measured using the Participant Outcomes and Status Measures—Nursing Facility survey, which has 10 sections and 63 items. Total scores range from 20 (lowest possible quality of life) to 100 (highest).Setting/participantsLong-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition (n = 316) were interviewed.ResultsThe average quality- of-life score was 71.4 (SD: 7.6; range: 45.1–93.0). Multilevel regression models revealed that quality of life was associated with physical impairment (parameter estimate = −0.728; P = .04) and depression (parameter estimate = −3.015; P = .01) but not Nursing Home Compare's overall star rating (parameter estimate = 0.683; P = .12) and not pain (parameter estimate = −0.705; P = .47).ConclusionThe 5-star quality rating system did not reflect the quality of life of long-stay nursing home residents with preserved cognition. Notably, pain was not associated with quality of life, but physical impairment and depression were.     

Temperature in Nursing Home Residents Systematically Tested for SARS-CoV-2

ObjectivesMany nursing home residents infected with SARS-CoV-2 fail to be identified with standard screening for the associated COVID-19 syndrome. Current nursing home COVID-19 screening guidance includes assessment for fever, defined as a temperature of at least 38.0°C. The objective of this study was to describe the temperature changes before and after universal testing for SARS-CoV-2 in nursing home residents.DesignCohort study.Setting and ParticipantsThe Veterans Administration (VA) operates 134 Community Living Centers (CLC), similar to nursing homes, that house residents who cannot live independently. VA guidance to CLCs directed daily clinical screening for COVID-19 that included temperature assessment.MeasuresAll CLC residents (n = 7325) underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing. We report the temperature in the window of 14 days before and after universal SARS-CoV-2 testing among CLC residents. Baseline temperature was calculated for 5 days before the study window.ResultsSARS-CoV-2 was identified in 443 (6.0%) residents. The average maximum temperature in SARS-CoV-2–positive residents was 37.66 (0.69) compared with 37.11 (0.36) (P = .001) in SARS-CoV-2–negative residents. Temperatures in those with SARS-CoV-2 began rising 7 days before testing and remained elevated during the 14-day follow-up. Among SARS-CoV-2–positive residents, only 26.6% (n = 118) met the fever threshold of 38.0°C during the survey period. Most residents (62.5%, n = 277) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 did experience 2 or more 0.5°C elevations above their baseline values. One cohort of SARS-CoV-2 residents' (20.3%, n = 90) temperatures never deviated >0.5°C from baseline.Conclusions and ImplicationsA single screening for temperature is unlikely to detect nursing home residents with SARS-CoV-2. Repeated temperature measurement with a patient-derived baseline can increase sensitivity. The current fever threshold as a screening criteria for SARS-CoV-2 infection should be reconsidered.