Postoperative pneumonia after bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program study

BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical centers had to weigh the benefits and risks of conducting bariatric surgery. Obesity increases the risk of developing severe COVID-19 infections, and therefore, bariatric surgery is beneficial. In contrast, surgical patients who test positive for COVID-19 have higher mortality rates.ObjectiveThis study investigates the national prevalence of postoperative pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic in the bariatric surgery population.SettingThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) database.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study using the ACS-NSQIP database. The population of concern included patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures. Information was extracted on rate of postoperative pneumonia and other 30-day complications between 2018 and 2020.ResultsAll baseline characteristics were similar among patients who underwent bariatric surgery between 2018 and 2020. However, there was a 156% increase in postoperative pneumonia in 2020 compared with the previous year. Furthermore, despite the similar postoperative complication rates across the years, there was a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality in 2020. The multivariate analysis showed that having surgery in 2020 was a statistically significant risk factor for pneumonia development postoperatively.ConclusionsThis study showed a statistically significant increase in the prevalence of postoperative pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic among bariatric surgery patients. Surgical centers must continuously evaluate the risks associated with healthcare-associated exposure to COVID-19 and weigh the benefits of bariatric surgery.     

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery in North America: a retrospective analysis of 834,647 patients

BackgroundCOVID-19 has transformed surgical care, yet little is known regarding implications for bariatric surgery.ObjectiveWe sought to characterize the effect of COVID-19 on bariatric surgery delivery and outcomes.SettingThe Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) collects data from 885 centers in North America.MethodsThe MBSAQIP database was evaluated with 2 cohorts described: the COVID-19 and the pre–COVID-19, with patients receiving surgery in 2020 and 2015–2019, respectively. Yearly operative trends were characterized, and bivariate analysis compared demographics and postoperative outcomes. Multivariable modeling evaluated 30-day readmission, reintervention, and reoperation rates and factors associated with undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.ResultsWe evaluated 834,647 patients, with 155,830 undergoing bariatric surgery during the 2020 pandemic year. A 12.1% reduction in total cases (177,208 in 2019 versus 155,830 in 2020; P < .001) and 13.8% reduction in cases per center occurred (204.2 cases per center in 2019 versus 176.1 cases per center in 2020; P < .001). Patients receiving bariatric surgery during the pandemic were younger and had fewer co-morbidities. Use of sleeve gastrectomy increased (74.5% versus 72.5%; P < .001), and surgery during COVID-19 was associated with reduced Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure selection (odds ratio = .83; 95% CI: .82–.84; P < .001). Length of stay decreased significantly (1.4 ± 1.4 days versus 1.6 ± 1.4 days; P < .001), yet postoperative outcomes were similar. After adjusting for co-morbidities, patients during COVID-19 had decreased 30-day odds of readmission and reintervention and a small increase in odds of reoperation.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic dramatically changed bariatric surgery delivery. Further studies evaluating the long-term effects of these changes are warranted.     

Outcomes of obese patients hospitalized with COVID-19: the impact of prior bariatric surgery

BackgroundObesity and several obesity-related co-morbidities are risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease. Because bariatric surgery successfully treats obesity-related conditions, we hypothesized that prior bariatric surgery may be associated with less severe COVID-19 disease.ObjectivesTo examine the association between prior bariatric surgery and outcomes in patients with obesity admitted with COVID-19.SettingUnited StatesMethodsThe Vizient database was used to obtain demographic and outcomes data for adults with obesity admitted with COVID-19 from May 2020 to January 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with and those without prior bariatric surgery. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were mortality by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and co-morbidity; intubation rate; hemodialysis rate; and length of stay. Because the database only provides aggregate data and not patient-level data, multivariate analysis could not be performed.ResultsAmong the 124,699 patients with obesity admitted with COVID-19, 2,607 had previous bariatric surgery and 122,092 did not. The proportion of patients ≥65 years of age was higher in the non–bariatric surgery group (36.0% versus 27.6%, P < .0001). Compared with patients without prior bariatric surgery, patients with prior bariatric surgery had lower in-hospital mortality (7.8 versus 11.2%, P < .0001) and intubation rates (18.5% versus 23.6%, P = .0009). Hemodialysis rate (7.2% versus 6.9%, P = .5) and length of stay (8.8 versus 9.6 days, P = .8) were similar between groups. Mortality was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery group for patients 18–64 years of age (5.9% versus 7.4%, P = .01) and ≥65 years of age (12.9% versus 17.9%, P = .0006).ConclusionsThis retrospective cohort study found that inpatients with obesity and COVID-19 who had prior bariatric surgery had improved outcomes compared with a similar cohort without prior bariatric surgery. Further studies should examine mechanisms for the association between bariatric surgery and less severe COVID-19.     

Prior bariatric surgery in COVID-19–positive patients may be protective

BackgroundPatients infected with novel COVID-19 virus have a spectrum of illnesses ranging from asymptomatic to death. Data have shown that age, sex, and obesity are strongly correlated with poor outcomes in COVID-19–positive patients. Bariatric surgery is the only treatment that provides significant, sustained weight loss in the severely obese.ObjectivesExamine if prior bariatric surgery correlates with increased risk of hospitalization and outcome severity after COVID-19 infection.SettingUniversity hospitalMethodsA cross-sectional retrospective analysis of a COVID-19 database from a single, New York City–based, academic institution was conducted. A cohort of COVID-19–positive patients with a history of bariatric surgery (n = 124) were matched in a 1:4 ratio to a control cohort of COVID-19–positive patients who were eligible for bariatric surgery (BMI ≥40 kg/m² or BMI >35 kg/m² with a co-morbidity at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis) (n = 496). A comparison of outcomes, including mechanical ventilation requirements and deceased at discharge, was done between cohorts using χ² test or Fisher’s exact test. Additionally, overall length of stay and duration of time in intensive care unit (ICU) were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Conditional logistic regression analyses were done to determine both unadjusted (UOR) and adjusted odds ratios (AOR).ResultsA total of 620 COVID-19–positive patients were included in this analysis. The categorization of bariatric surgeries included 36% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 45), 36% laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB, n = 44), and 28% laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG, n = 35). The body mass index (BMI) for the bariatric group was 36.1 kg/m² (SD = 8.3), which was significantly lower than the control group, 41.4 kg/m² (SD = 6.5, P < .0001). There was also less burden of diabetes in the bariatric group (32%) compared with the control group (48%) (P = .0019). Patients with a history of bariatric surgery were less likely to be admitted through the emergency room (UOR = .39, P = .0001), less likely to require a ventilator during the admission (UOR=.42, P = .028), had a shorter length of stay in both the ICU (P = .033) and overall (UOR = .44, P = .0002), and were less likely to be deceased at discharge compared with the control group (OR = .42, P = .028).ConclusionA history of bariatric surgery significantly decreases the risk of emergency room admission, mechanical ventilation, prolonged ICU stay, and death in patients with COVID-19. Even when adjusted for BMI and the co-morbidities associated with obesity, patients with a history of bariatric surgery still have a significant decrease in the risk of emergency room admission.     

Bariatric surgery in patients with previous COVID-19 infection

BackgroundThe process of reintroducing bariatric surgery to our communities in a COVID-19 environment was particular to each country. Furthermore, no clear recommendation was made for patients with a previous COVID-19 infection and a favorable outcome who were seeking bariatric surgery.ObjectivesTo analyze the risks of specific complications for patients with previous COVID-19 infection who were admitted for bariatric surgery.SettingEight high-volume private centers from 5 countries.MethodsAll patients with morbid obesity and previous COVID-19 infection admitted for bariatric surgery were included in the current study. Patients were enrolled from 8 centers and 5 countries, and their electronic health data were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was to identify early (<30 d) specific complications related to COVID-19 infection following bariatric surgery, and the secondary outcome was to analyze additional factors from work-ups that could prevent complications.ResultsThirty-five patients with a mean age of 40 years (range, 21–68 yr) and a mean body mass index of 44.3 kg/m² (±7.4 kg/m²) with previous COVID-19 infection underwent different bariatric procedures: 23 cases of sleeve (65.7 %), 7 cases of bypass, and 5 other cases. The symptomatology of the previous COVID-19 infection varied: 15 patients had no symptoms, 12 had fever and respiratory signs, 5 had only fever, 2 had digestive symptoms, and 1 had isolated respiratory signs. Only 5 patients (14.2 %) were hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, for a mean period of 8.8 days (range, 6–15 d). One patient was admitted to an intensive care unit and needed invasive mechanical ventilation. The mean interval time from COVID-19 infection to bariatric surgery was 11.3 weeks (3–34 wk). The mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (±1 d), and all patients were clinically evaluated 1 month following the bariatric procedure. There were 2 readmissions and 1 case of complication: that case was of a gastric leak treated with laparoscopic drainage and a repeated pigtail drain, with a favorable outcome. No cases of other specific complications or mortality were recorded.ConclusionMinor and moderate COVID-19 infections, especially the forms not complicated with invasive mechanical ventilation, should not preclude the indication for bariatric surgery. In our experience, a prior COVID-19 infection does not induce additional specific complications following bariatric surgery.     

Pain and function deteriorate in patients awaiting total joint arthroplasty that has been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUNDElective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) procedures have been postponed as part of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) response to avert healthcare system collapse. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures comprise the highest volume of elective procedures performed at health care facilities worldwide.AIMTo determine the demand for TJA despite the pandemic and the impact of surgery postponement on physical and mental health.METHODSWe conducted a prospective cross-sectional telephonic interview-based study on patients awaiting THA and TKA at an academic institution in South Africa. The questionnaire consisted of four sections. The first section recorded baseline demographic data and medical co-morbidities, the length of time spent awaiting TJA, and the patients’ desire to undergo elective surgery despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Section 2 and Section 3 assessed the patients’ current physical and mental health, respectively, as a consequence of deferred surgical intervention. The last section established the patients’ perception of the healthcare system’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic and necessity to postpone elective surgery. Patients received counseling and education on the current state of surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated risks. Thereafter, patients were once again asked about their desire to undergo TJA during the COVID-19 pandemic.RESULTSWe included 185 patients (65.95% female; mean age: 50.28 years) awaiting TJA for a mean of 26.42 ± 30.1 mo. Overall, 88.65% of patients wanted TJA despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients awaiting TJA for 1-3 years were 3.3-fold more likely to want surgery than those waiting < 1 year (P < 0.000). Patients with comorbidities were 8.4-fold less likely to want TJA than those with no comorbidities (P = 0.013). After receiving education, the patients wanting TJA decreased to 54.05%. Patients who changed their opinion after education had less insight on the increased morbidity (P = 0.046) and mortality (P = 0.001) associated with COVID-19. Despite awaiting TJA for shorter period (24.7 ± 20.38 mo), patients who continued to demand TJA had greater pain (P < 0.000) and decreased function (P = 0.043) since TJA postponement.CONCLUSIONThere is deterioration in health for patients, who have had elective procedures postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Waiting lists should be prioritized for urgency with the re-initiation of elective surgery.     

Bariatric Surgery is Safe for Patients After Recovery from COVID-19

BackgroundStudies of patients who have undergone surgery while infected with COVID-19 have shown increased risks for adverse outcomes in both pulmonary complications and mortality. It has become clear that the risk of complications from perioperative COVID-19 infection must be weighed against the risk from delayed surgical treatment. Studies have also shown that prior bariatric surgery conveys protection against mortality from COVID-19 and that obesity is the biggest risk factor for mortality from COVID-19 infection in adults under 45 years of age. Studies in patients who have fully recovered from COVID-19 and underwent elective surgery have not become widely available yet.ObjectivesThis multi-institutional case series is presented to highlight patients who developed COVID-19, fully recovered, and subsequently underwent elective bariatric surgery with 30-day outcomes available.SettingNine bariatric surgery centers located across the United States.MethodsThis multicenter case series is a retrospective chart review of patients who developed COVID-19, recovered, and subsequently underwent bariatric surgery. Fifty-three patients are included, and 30-day morbidity and mortality were analyzed.ResultsThirty-day complications included esophageal spasm, dehydration, and ileus. There were no cardiovascular, venous thromboembolism (VTE) or respiratory events reported. There were no 30- day mortalities.ConclusionsBariatric surgery has been safely performed in patients who made a full recovery from COVID-19 without increased complications due to cardiovascular, pulmonary, venous thromboembolism, or increased mortality rates.     

Impacto del COVID-19 en pacientes con estenosis aórtica severa: análisis basado en inteligencia artificial

IntroductionUntreated, severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis is associated with an ominous diagnosis without intervention. This study aims to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality of patients with severe stenosis during the first wave and compare it with the same period last year.MethodsAll patients who went to the hospitals in an Spanish region during the first wave, and in the same period of previous year, were analyzed using artificial intelligence-based software, evaluating the mortality of patients with severe aortic stenosis with and without COVID-19 during the pandemic and the pre-COVID era. Mortality of the 3 groups was compared. Regarding cardiac surgeries was a tendency to decrease (P = .07) in patients without COVID-19 between the pandemic and the previous period was observed. A significant decrease of surgeries between patients with COVID-19 and without COVID-19 was shown.ResultsData showed 13.82% less admitted patients during the first wave. A total of 1,112 of them had aortic stenosis and 5.48% were COVID-19 positive. Mortality was higher (P = .01), in COVID-19 negative during the pandemic (4.37%) versus those in the pre-COVID-19 era (2.57%); it was also in the COVID-19 positive group (11.47%), versus COVID-19 negative (4.37%) during the first wave (P = .01).ConclusionsThe study revealed a decrease in patients who went to the hospital and an excess of mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis without infection during the first wave, compared to the same period last year; and also, in COVID-19 positive patients versus COVID-19 negative.     

Worsening Arthroplasty Utilization With Widening Racial Variance During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BackgroundElective arthroplasty surgery in the United States came to a near-complete halt in the spring of 2019 as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Racial disparity has been a long-term concern in healthcare with increased focus during the pandemic. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 and race on arthroplasty utilization trends during the pandemic.MethodsWe used 2019 and 2020 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service fee-for-service claims data to compare arthroplasty volumes prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We compared overall arthroplasty utilization rates between 2019 and 2020 and then sought to determine the effect of race and COVID-19, both independently and combined.ResultsThere was a decrease in primary total knee arthroplasty (?28%), primary total hip arthroplasty (?14%), primary total hip arthroplasty for fracture (?2%), and revision arthroplasty (?14%) utilization between 2019 and 2020. The highest decrease in overall arthroplasty utilization was in the Hispanic population (34% decrease vs 19% decrease in the White population). We found that a non-White patient was 39.9% (P < .001) less likely to receive a total joint arthroplasty prior to COVID-19. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated the pre-existing racial differences in arthroplasty utilization by decreasing the probability of receiving a total joint arthroplasty for non-White patient by another 12.9% (P < .001).ConclusionWe found an overall decreased utilization rate of arthroplasty during the COVID-19 pandemic with further decrease noted in all non-White populations. This raises significant concern for worsening racial disparity in arthroplasty caused by the ongoing pandemic.     

Eating behaviors and weight outcomes in bariatric surgery patients amidst COVID-19

BackgroundRecent studies suggest that eating habits are an area particularly affected by the lockdown imposed by many countries to curb the COVID-19 epidemic. Individuals that received bariatric surgery may represent a particularly susceptible population to the adverse effects of lockdown for its potential impact on eating, psychological, and weight loss outcomes.ObjectivesThis study seeks to investigate the incremental impact of COVID-19 lockdown on treatment outcomes of postbariatric patients in the risk period for weight regain.SettingMain hospital center.MethodsThis work uses data from an ongoing longitudinal study of bariatric patients assessed before surgery (T₀), 1.5 years after sugery (T₁), and 3 years after surgery (T₂). Two independent groups were compared: the COVID-19_Group (n = 35) where T₀ and T₁ assessments were conducted before the pandemic started and T₂ assessment was conducted at the end of the mandatory COVID-19 lockdown; and the NonCOVID-19_Group (n = 66), covering patients who completed T₀, T₁, and T₂ assessments before the epidemic began. Assessment included self-report measures for disordered eating, negative urgency, depression, anxiety, stress, and weight outcomes.ResultsGeneral linear models for repeated measures showed that the COVID-19_Group presented significantly higher weight concern (F = 8.403, P = .005, ?²_p = .094), grazing behavior (F = 7.166, P = .009, ?²_p = .076), and negative urgency (F = 4.522, P = .036, ?²_p = .05) than the NonCOVID-19_Group. The COVID-19_Group also showed less total weight loss (F = 4.029, P = .05, ?²_p = .04) and larger weight regain at T₂, with more COVID-19_Group participants experiencing excessive weight regain (20% versus 4.5%).ConclusionThese results show evidence for the impact of the coronavirus outbreak on eating-related psychopathology and weight outcomes in postbariatric surgery patients.     

How are bariatric patients coping during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic? Analysis of factors known to cause weight regain among postoperative bariatric patients

BackgroundThe global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is wreaking havoc on society. Bariatric patients are more prone to severe infection due to their high body mass index (BMI) and are more vulnerable to the effects of isolation, such as depression or disruption of their health habits.ObjectivesTo quantify the impact of self-quarantine on bariatric patients and self-quarantine’s relationship with weight gain.SettingAcademic hospital, United States.MethodsA 30-item survey examining several known contributors to weight regain was distributed among the postoperative bariatric patients of our clinic. Changes in eating habits, exercise, depression, social support, loneliness, and anxiety were studied, among others.ResultsA total of 208 patients completed the survey (29.3% response rate). A large percentage of patients reported increases in their depression (44.2%), loneliness (36.2%), nervousness (54.7%), snacking (62.6%), loss of control when eating (48.2%), and binge eating (19.5%) and decreases in their social support (23.2%), healthy food eating (45.5%), and activity (55.2%). Difficulty in accessing vitamins was reported by 13%. Patients more than 18 months out of surgery regained more than 2 kg during an average of 47 days. Risk factors for weight regain were found to be loss of control when eating, increases in snacking and binge eating, reduced consumption of healthy food, and reduced physical activity.ConclusionBariatric patients are negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social isolation on many levels. This patient population is vulnerable to crisis situations; thus, additional intervention is needed to address behaviors that lead to weight regain.     

Effect of telehealth implementation on an adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery program

BackgroundPediatric severe obesity is a worldwide health concern. Treatment with metabolic and bariatric surgery can reduce morbidity and mortality. The COVID-19 pandemic not only has had a significant effect on rates of pediatric obesity but also has necessitated a rapid transition to virtual medicine.ObjectiveWe aimed to identify and examine adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery patient participation rates through our program’s virtual telehealth programming as compared with prepandemic traditional in-person clinic appointments.SettingThis study took place at an academic pediatric quaternary care center.MethodsWe evaluated 92 adolescent patients with a total of 2442 unique encounters between January 2018 and July 2021.ResultsThe rate of attendance was found to be greater for telehealth visits (83.1%) than for in-person appointments (70.5%) for all clinics regardless of appointment type (preoperative versus postoperative). Cancellation rates were lower for telehealth visits (9.9%) than for in-person appointments (22.5%).ConclusionThis study provides evidence that telehealth can be implemented successfully in an adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery program and can improve attendance rates for all provider and appointment subtypes.     

Changes in breast cancer management during the Corona Virus Disease 19 pandemic: An international survey of the European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists (EUBREAST)

BackgroundCorona Virus Disease 19 (COVID-19) had a worldwide negative impact on healthcare systems, which were not used to coping with such pandemic. Adaptation strategies prioritizing COVID-19 patients included triage of patients and reduction or re-allocation of other services. The aim of our survey was to provide a real time international snapshot of modifications of breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA survey was developed by a multidisciplinary group on behalf of European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists and distributed via breast cancer societies. One reply per breast unit was requested.ResultsIn ten days, 377 breast centres from 41 countries completed the questionnaire. RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 prior to treatment was reported by 44.8% of the institutions. The estimated time interval between diagnosis and treatment initiation increased for about 20% of institutions. Indications for primary systemic therapy were modified in 56% (211/377), with upfront surgery increasing from 39.8% to 50.7% (p < 0.002) and from 33.7% to 42.2% (p < 0.016) in T1cN0 triple-negative and ER-negative/HER2-positive cases, respectively. Sixty-seven percent considered that chemotherapy increases risks for developing COVID-19 complications. Fifty-one percent of the responders reported modifications in chemotherapy protocols. Gene-expression profile used to evaluate the need for adjuvant chemotherapy increased in 18.8%. In luminal-A tumours, a large majority (68%) recommended endocrine treatment to postpone surgery. Postoperative radiation therapy was postponed in 20% of the cases.ConclusionsBreast cancer management was considerably modified during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our data provide a base to investigate whether these changes impact oncologic outcomes.     

Patient Motivations and Goals for Bariatric Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study

BackgroundExisting research has primarily focused on weight as the outcome of interest for bariatric surgery; however, patients frequently report other lifestyle and interpersonal surgery motivations and goals. Understanding the spectrum of bariatric surgery goals and motivations has important implications for enhancing patient-centered care and surgery outcomes.ObjectivesThe current study characterized the nature of bariatric patient motivations and goals for surgery, described the extent to which motivations matched goals, and examined whether men and women differed in the specific motivations/goals described.SettingTeaching hospital, United StatesMethodsData were obtained via retrospective chart review of bariatric patient responses to the clinic’s standard open-ended questions about motivations and goals for bariatric surgery. A mixed method approach was used, including content analysis, to identify themes and χ²/t test analyses to test gender differences.ResultsSurgery motivations and outcome goals were reflected by 8 overarching and overlapping themes. The most common motivations were related to general health and quality of life. The most common goals were to improve health/longevity and mobility. Over a quarter of patients showed no overlap between motivations and goals. Few gender differences were observed.ConclusionFindings underscore the importance of goals beyond weight loss, as well as the utility of helping patients shape their goals in accordance with goal-setting theories.     

What Has Changed in Patients Aged 65 and over Diagnosed with Breast Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has a worldwide negative impact on healthcare systems. This study aims to determine how the diagnosis, clinicopathological features, and treatment approaches of patients with breast cancer (BC) diagnosed at ≥65 years old were affected during the pandemic. This survey has shown that patients, especially the elderly, had to postpone their BC health problems or delay their routine controls due to the risk of COVID-19 transmission, high mortality rates due to comorbidity, and restrictions.Materials and MethodsThe medical records of 153 patients with BC diagnosed at ≥65 years old before (January–December 2019; group A, n = 61) and during (March 2020–May 2021; group B, n = 92) the COVID-19 pandemic were retrospectively analyzed. In addition, clinicopathological features of patients, including age, admission form, clinical stage, tumor (T) size-grade-histology-subtype, lymph node involvement, surgery type, and treatment protocols, were evaluated.ResultsPatients mostly applied for screening purposes were included in group A and patients who frequently applied for diagnostic purposes due to their existing BC or other complaints were included in group B (p = 0.009). Group B patients had a higher clinical stage (p = 0.026) and had commonly larger (p = 0.020) and high-grade (p = 0.001) Ts. Thus, mastectomy and neoadjuvant systemic therapy were more commonly performed in group B (p = 0.041 and p = 0.005).ConclusionThe survey showed significant changes in BC diagnosis and treatment protocols for patients diagnosed at ≥65 years old during the COVID-19 pandemic. Postponing screening and delaying treatment leads to more advanced BC stages in elderly patients.     

Public Perceptions of Resuming Elective Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BackgroundMany U.S. health systems are grappling with how to safely resume elective surgery amid the COVID-19 pandemic. We used online crowdsourcing to explore public perceptions and concerns toward resuming elective surgery during the pandemic, and to determine factors associated with the preferred timing of surgery after health systems reopen.MethodsA 21-question survey was completed by 722 members of the public using Amazon Mechanical Turk. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with the timing of preferred surgery after health systems reopen.ResultsMost (61%) participants were concerned with contracting COVID-19 during the surgical process, primarily during check-in and in waiting room areas, as well as through excessive interactions with staff. Overall, 57% would choose to have their surgery at a hospital over an outpatient surgery center. About 1 in 4 (27%) would feel comfortable undergoing elective surgery in the first month of health systems reopening. After multivariable adjustment, native English speaking (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.04-6.4; P = .042), male sex (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7; P < .001), and Veterans Affairs insurance (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.1-18.7; P = .036) were independent predictors of preferring earlier surgery.ConclusionWomen and non-native English speakers may be more hesitant to undergo elective surgery amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite concerns of contagion, more than half of the public favors a hospital setting over an outpatient surgery center for their elective surgery. Concerted efforts to minimize patient congestion and unnecessary face-to-face interactions may prove most effective in reducing public anxiety and concerns over the safety of resuming elective care.     

A comparison of patient same-day discharge selection after shoulder arthroplasty before and after the COVID-19 pandemic

BackgroundEarly discharge has been a target of cost control efforts, given the growing demand for joint replacement surgery. Select patients are given the choice for same-day discharge (SDD) or overnight stay after shoulder arthroplasty. The COVID-19 pandemic changed patient perspectives regarding hospital visitation and admission. The purpose of this study was to determine if the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the utilization of SDD after shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesize that patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic will have higher rates of SDD.MethodsA retrospective continuous review was performed on 370 patients who underwent a primary anatomic (total shoulder arthroplasty) or reverse shoulder arthroplasty between August 2019 and December 2020 by a single surgeon. This group of patients represent the 185 arthroplasty cases completed before the COVID-19 pandemic and the first 185 patients after the start of the pandemic. April 1, 2020, was chosen as the cutoff for pre-COVID patients, as this represents the date a statewide ban on elective surgery was declared. All patients were counseled preoperatively regarding SDD and given the choice to stay overnight, unless medically contraindicated. Demographics, medical history, length of stay, 30- and 90-day readmissions, and 90-day emergency room (ER) and urgent care visits were obtained from medical records and compared. Two-tailed student t-tests, chi-square tests, and Fischer’s exact were performed where appropriate.ResultsThe 2 groups were similar in age, body mass index, gender distribution, and Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment score. During the collection period, there were more anatomic shoulder arthroplasties performed after (54%) than before (44%) the COVID-19 pandemic (P = .029). Patients treated after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic were almost 3 times more likely to have an SDD (P < .001), with 85.4% (158/185) of patients being discharged the same day after COVID-19, compared with 34.6% (64/185) before COVID-19. Discharge disposition (location of discharge) was significantly different, as 99% (183/185) of patients undergoing surgery after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic were discharged home, compared with 94% (174/185) of patients before COVID-19. There was no difference in 30-day readmissions, 90-day readmissions, and 90-day (ER) and urgent care visits between the 2 groups.ConclusionOur study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically impacted patient choices for SDD within a single surgeon’s practice, with nearly 3 times as many patients electing for SDD. Readmissions and ER visits were similar, indicating that SDD remains a safe alternative for patients after total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Level of evidenceLevel III; Retrospective Comparative Study     

Elective foot and ankle surgery following the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic is safe: A report of 30-day morbidity and mortality

IntroductionThe safety of resuming elective surgical services remains unclear following several surges of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. Multiple studies have reported high rates of post-operative mortality and pulmonary complications. 30-day outcomes on an initial cohort of patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery at 3 central London hospitals are presented.Materials and methodsThis study is a retrospective review of the first 63 patients undergoing surgery following the first UK surge via a modified treatment pathway, based on published national guidelines, designed to minimise the risks to patients and staff associated with COVID-19.Results90% of patients were ASA 1 or 2, with an average age of 46. All tested negative for COVID-19 pre-operatively and all but one underwent a general anaesthetic. 10 patients required one night hospital stays and 1 was admitted for four nights. 52 were day case procedures. 2 complications were identified, not relating to COVID-19 infection. No 30-day mortalities or pulmonary complications were recorded.ConclusionsWith a community prevalence of COVID-19 of between 1 in 1500 and 1 in 1700, elective foot and ankle surgery was safe following the first surge of the pandemic in the UK. This data can guide elective service planning in countries with pandemic curves behind the UK’s or in the event of further surges in national cases.     

Variations in colorectal cancer surgery practice across the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic – ‘Every land has its own law’

BackgroundIn March 2020 NHS England issued guidelines recognizing the elective component of cancer surgeries may be ‘curtailed’, due to staffing and supply shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it suggested, ‘local solutions’ should be sought in order to protect the delivery of cancer services.We aimed to compare surgeons’ practice for the provision of colorectal (CR) cancer surgery across the United Kingdom (UK), against updated Joint Royal Colleges & ACPGBI guidelines and highlight differences in practice, if any.MethodAn online survey was conducted. It examined surgical practice across the UK against current protocols for CR cancer surgeries, during the COVID-19 pandemic.Results29 individual responses were received from 23 NHS Trusts across the UK. 23/29 (79%) surgeons ceased or experienced delays in their CR cancer surgeries during the pandemic, with 3/29 (10%) yet to reintroduce these services. 19/26 (73%) surgeons instructed their patients to self-isolate prior to surgery, of which 5/19 (26%) correctly enforced a duration of 14 days. 10/19 (53%) participants adhered to guidelines of performing a CT chest within 24 h of surgery. 10/26 (38%) participants believe their patients are experiencing longer hospital admissions in the COVID-19 setting.ConclusionThis snap shot survey highlights the dramatic variations in CR cancer surgery practice within the UK and inconsistent adherence to protocols. Guidelines will no doubt change as our knowledge of COVID-19 increases both nationally and internationally. It is essential CR surgeons keep up to date with changes in guidance, so uniformity in practice can be maintained.