Younger Individuals Increase Their Use of Nursing Homes Following ACA Medicaid Expansion

ObjectivesThis study examines the effect of Medicaid eligibility expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on the utilization of nursing home services by younger individuals and those covered by Medicaid.DesignCompared the age of nursing home residents, proportion of individuals covered by Medicaid, annual nursing home admissions in those younger than 65, and nursing home length of stay in states that expanded Medicaid eligibility through the ACA to states that did not. We used data from LTCFocus (nursing home level), the Minimum Data Set (individual level), and Medicaid expansion status from the Kaiser Family Foundation.Setting and ParticipantsThe study included 15,005,888 nursing home admissions, 2,446,950 of which were residents younger than 65, across 14,132 nursing homes between 2009 and 2016.MethodsA time-varying difference-in-difference model including state and year fixed effects with effect modification by pre-2014 nursing home occupancy.ResultsFacilities in expansion states with a pre-ACA occupancy rate of more than 70% increased the fraction of residents younger than 65 by 2.74% to 6.32%, compared with similar facilities in nonexpansion states. Medicaid admissions varied, with an increase in year 2 after expansion compared with nonexpansion states. Among residents entering from an acute care hospital, the proportion younger than 65 increased in facilities with pre-2014 occupancy rates of more than 70%, compared with similar facilities in nonexpansion states, an increase of up to 6.51%. Median nursing home length of stay for individuals younger than 65 decreased relative to nonexpansion states across all occupancy categories, ranging from 1.68 to 6.06 days after Medicaid expansion.Conclusions and ImplicationsMedicaid expansion increased access to nursing home post-acute care for individuals younger than 65. It remains unclear if the benefit of post-acute care is the same among this group, or if the needs of younger individuals can be adequately met in this setting.     

Are Dual Eligibles Admitted to Poorer Quality Skilled Nursing Facilities?

BackgroundDual eligibles, persons who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid coverage, often receive poorer quality care relative to other Medicare beneficiaries.ObjectivesTo determine whether dual eligibles are discharged to lower quality post-acute skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) compared with Medicare-only beneficiaries.SubjectsA total of 692,875 Medicare fee-for-service patients (22% duals) who were discharged for Medicare paid SNF care between July 2004 and June 2005.MeasuresMedicare enrollment and the Medicaid Analytic Extract files were used to determine dual eligibility. The proportion of Medicaid patients and nursing staff characteristics provided measures of SNF quality.ResultsDuals are more likely to be discharged to SNFs with a higher share of Medicaid patients and fewer nurses. These results are robust to estimation with an alternative subsample of patients based on primary diagnoses, propensity of being dual eligible, and likelihood of remaining in the nursing home.ConclusionsDisparities exist in access to quality SNF care for duals. Strategies to improve discharge planning processes are required to redirect patients to higher quality providers, regardless of Medicaid eligibility.     

Trends in Postacute Care and Staffing in US Nursing Homes, 2001–2010

Objective

The objective of this study was to document the growth of postacute care and contemporaneous staffing trends in US nursing homes over the decade 2001 to 2010.

Design

We integrated data from all US nursing homes longitudinally to track annual changes in the levels of postacute care intensity, therapy staffing and direct-care staffing separately for freestanding and hospital-based facilities.

Setting

All Medicare/Medicaid-certified nursing homes from 2001 to 2010 based on the Online Survey Certification and Reporting System database merged with facility-level case mix measures aggregated from resident-level information from the Minimum Data Set and Medicare Part A claims.

Measurements

We created a number of aggregate case mix measures to approximate the intensity of postacute care per facility per year, including the proportion of SNF-covered person days, number of admissions per bed, and average RUG-based case mix index. We also created measures of average hours per resident day for physical and occupational therapists, PT/OT assistants, PT/OT aides, and direct-care nursing staff.

Results

In freestanding nursing homes, all postacute care intensity measures increased considerably each year throughout the study period. In contrast, in hospital-based facilities, all but one of these measures decreased. Similarly, therapy staffing has risen substantially in freestanding homes but declined in hospital-based facilities. Postacute care case mix acuity appeared to correlate reasonably well with therapy staffing levels in both types of facilities.

Conclusion

There has been a marked and steady shift toward postacute care in the nursing home industry in the past decade, primarily in freestanding facilities, accompanied by increased therapy staffing.     

Growth of Physicians and Nurse Practitioners Practicing Full Time in Nursing Homes

ObjectivesThe objective was to describe the growth of physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs) who practice full time in nursing homes, to assess resident and nursing home characteristics associated with receiving care from full-time providers, and describe variation among nursing homes in use of full-time providers.DesignRetrospective cohort study.Setting and ParticipantsA 20% national sample Medicare data on long-term care residents in 2008 to 2018 and the physicians, NPs, and PAs who submitted charges to Medicare for their care.MethodsWe measured the percentage of provider charges for services rendered in nursing homes, in addition to resident and facility characteristics.ResultsFull-time nursing home providers increased from 26.0% of all nursing home providers in 2008 to 44.6% in 2017. The largest increase was in NPs: from 1986 in 2008 to 4479 in 2017. Resident age, sex, Medicaid eligibility, and race/ethnicity had minimal association with the odds of having a full-time provider, whereas residents with an NP primary care provider were 23.0 times more likely (95% confidence interval = 21.6, 24.6) to have a full-time provider. Residents who received care from both a physician and an NP or PA increased from 33.6% in 2008 to 62.5% in 2018. There was large variation among facilities in the percentage of residents with full-time providers, from 5.72% of residents with full-time providers in the bottom quintile of facilities to 91.44% in the top quintile. Individual nursing homes accounted for 59% of the variation in whether a resident had a full-time provider.Conclusions and ImplicationsThe percentage of nursing home residents with full-time providers continues to grow, with very large variation among nursing homes.     

Impact of the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act on Nursing Homes

The Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act (MCCA) of 1988 altered eligibility and coverage for skilled nursing facility (SNF) care and changed Medicaid eligibility rules for nursing-home residents. Detailed data on the residents of a for-profit nursing-home chain and Medicare claims for a 1 percent sample of beneficiaries were used to examine the impact of the MCCA on nursing homes. The case mix of nursing-home admissions was scrutinized, specifically for length of stay, discharge disposition, rate of hospitalization, and changes in payer source. Findings revealed that, although the proportion of Medicare-financed nursing-home care increased, as did the case-mix severity of residents during the MCCA period, there was no corollary reduction in hospital use by nursing-home residents.     

Association Between Clinician Specialization in Nursing Home Care and Nursing Home Clinical Quality Scores

ImportanceWhile the number of prescribing clinicians (physicians and nurse practitioners) who provide any nursing home care remained stable over the past decade, the number of clinicians who focus their practice exclusively on nursing home care has increased by over 30%.ObjectivesTo measure the association between regional trends in clinician specialization in nursing home care and nursing home quality.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.Setting and ParticipantsPatients treated in 15,636 nursing homes in 305 US hospital referral regions between 2013 and 2016.MeasuresClinician specialization in nursing home care for 2012–2015 was measured using Medicare fee-for-service billings. Nursing home specialists were defined as generalist physicians (internal medicine, family medicine, geriatrics, and general practice) or advanced practitioners (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) with at least 90% of their billings for care in nursing homes. The number of clinicians was aggregated at the hospital referral region level and divided by the number of occupied Medicare-certified nursing home beds. Nursing Home Compare quality measure scores for 2013–2016 were aggregated at the HHR level, weighted by occupied beds in each nursing home in the hospital referral region. We measured the association between the number of nursing home specialists per 1000 beds and the clinical quality measure scores in the subsequent year using linear regression.ResultsAn increase in nursing home specialists per 1000 occupied beds in a region was associated with lower use of long-stay antipsychotic medications and indwelling bladder catheters, higher prevalence of depressive symptoms, and was not associated with urinary tract infections, use of restraints, or short-stay antipsychotic use.Conclusions and ImplicationsHigher prevalence of nursing home specialists was associated with regional improvements in 2 of 6 quality measures. Future studies should evaluate whether concentrating patient care among clinicians who specialize in nursing home practice improves outcomes for individual patients. The current findings suggest that prescribing clinicians play an important role in nursing home care quality.     

Changes in Long-Term Care Markets: Assisted Living Supply and the Prevalence of Low-Care Residents in Nursing Homes

ObjectivesTo assess the effect of changes in assisted living (AL) capacity within a market on prevalence of residents with low care needs in nursing homes.DesignRetrospective, longitudinal analysis of nursing home markets.Setting and participantsTwelve thousand two hundred fifity-one nursing homes in operation during 2007 and 2014.MeasurementsWe analyzed the percentage of residents in a nursing home who qualified as low-care. For each nursing home, we constructed a market consisting of AL communities, Medicare beneficiaries, and competing nursing homes within a 15-mile radius. We estimated the effect of change in AL beds on prevalence of low-care residents using multivariate linear models with year and nursing home fixed effects.ResultsThe supply of AL beds increased by an average 258 beds per nursing home market (standard deviation = 591) during the study period. The prevalence of low-care residents decreased from an average of 13.0% (median 10.5%) to 12.2% (median 9.5%). In adjusted models, a 100-bed increase in AL supply was associated with a decrease in low-care residents of 0.041 percentage points (P = .026), controlling for changes in market and nursing home characteristics, county demographics, and year and nursing home fixed effects. In markets with a high percentage of its Medicare beneficiaries (≥14%) dual eligible for Medicaid, the effect of AL is stronger, with a 0.066–percentage point decrease per 100 AL beds (P = .026) vs a 0.016–percentage point decrease in low-duals markets (P = .48).Conclusions and implicationsOur analysis suggests that some of the growth in AL capacity serves as a substitute for nursing homes for patients with low care needs. Furthermore, the effects are concentrated in markets with an above-average proportion of beneficiaries with dual Medicaid eligibility.     

Reducing Transfers among Long-Stay Nursing Facility Residents to Acute Care Settings: Effect of the 2013‒2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Initiative

ObjectivesFrom 2013 to 2016, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Hospitalizations among Nursing Facility Residents (“the Initiative”) tested a series of clinical interventions and care models, through organizations called Enhanced Care and Coordination Providers (ECCPs), with the goal of reducing avoidable inpatient hospital admissions among long-stay nursing home residents. We identify the effect of the Initiative on the probability and count of acute care transfers [capturing any transfer to the hospital, including hospitalizations (inpatient stays), emergency department visits, and observation stays].DesignWe evaluate the effect of the Initiative on the probability and count of all-cause acute care transfers and potentially avoidable acute care transfers and estimate the average effect of the Initiative per resident per year.Setting and ParticipantsWe use 2011–2016 data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Minimum Data Set, version 3.0, nursing home resident assessments linked with Medicare eligibility and enrollment data and Medicare inpatient and outpatient hospital claims. Our sample is limited to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in participating ECCP facilities and a comparison group of long-stay nursing facility residents.MethodsWe evaluate the effect of the Initiative on both the probability and count of all-cause acute care transfers and potentially avoidable acute care transfers using difference-in-differences regression models controlling for both resident-level clinical and demographic characteristics as well as facility-level characteristics.ResultsWe found statistically significant evidence of a reduction in both the probability and count of all-cause and potentially avoidable acute care transfers among long-stay nursing facility residents who participated in the Initiative, relative to comparison group residents.Conclusions and ImplicationsThe clinical interventions and care models implemented by the ECCPs show that by using staff education, facility leadership and physician engagement, and/or clinical assessment and treatment of residents who experienced a change in condition, it is possible to reduce acute care transfers of nursing facility residents. This could lead to better outcomes and reduced cost of care for this vulnerable patient population.     

Use of Post-Acute Care by Medicare Beneficiaries With a Diagnosis of Dementia

ObjectivesHospitalized patients with dementia transitioning to post-acute care may be particularly vulnerable to changes in post-acute care utilization driven by payment reforms; however, use of post-acute care in this population is incompletely understood. We sought to describe post-acute care utilization in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and from home health (HH) agencies among Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of dementia.DesignRetrospective, observational study using 100% sample of Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2016.Setting and ParticipantsWe identified hospitalizations and diagnoses using Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR), SNF stays using the Minimum Data Set, HH episodes using the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, and dementia diagnoses using the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File Chronic Conditions segment.MethodsWe calculated overall utilization and trends in post-acute care use over time, stratified by dementia diagnosis, type of post-acute care (SNF vs HH), and payer (fee-for-service vs Medicare Advantage).ResultsOf the 9,762,208 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries who received post-acute care from 2013 to 2016, 3,155,560 (32.3%) carried a diagnosis of dementia. Rates of post-acute care use were similar over time. More beneficiaries with a diagnosis of dementia received post-acute care (44.2% vs 27.7%) and proportionally more SNF care (71.7% vs 49.6%). Overall use and trends were similar in the Medicare Advantage population.Conclusions and ImplicationsOne-third of all fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries receiving post-acute care have a diagnosis of dementia, and more than 7 in 10 receive this care in an SNF. These findings serve as a foundation for needed evaluations of how best to meet the post-hospital needs of older adults with dementia.     

Outcomes of Medicaid home- and community-based long-term services relative to nursing home care among dual eligibles

ObjectiveTo provide the first plausibly causal national estimates of health outcomes for older dual‐eligible recipients of Medicaid HCBS relative to nursing home care and to explore possible mechanisms for the effect.Data SourcesWe use 2005 and 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), a national compilation of Medicaid claims, merged with Medicare claims to identify hospital admissions, our main outcome variable.Study DesignWe model the effects of HCBS using a longitudinal instrumental variables framework. To address the endogeneity of HCBS receipt, we instrument for it using the county percentage of nonelderly long‐term care users who receive HCBS. The percentage of nonelderly users is highly predictive of HCBS use for an elderly beneficiary, but because the instrument was derived from a separate population, the exclusion restriction is unlikely to be violated.Population Studied1,312,498 older adults (65+) dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare and are using long‐term care. We also examine heterogeneity of effects by race/ethnicity and the presence of dementia.Principal FindingsHCBS users have 10 percentage points higher (P < .01) annual rates of hospitalization than their nursing home counterparts when selection bias is addressed; rates of potentially avoidable hospitalizations are 3 percentage points higher (P < .01). These differences persist across races, dementia status, and intensity of HCBS spending.ConclusionsShifting Medicaid long‐term care funding for older adults from nursing homes to HCBS, while well‐motivated, results in the unintended consequence of substantially higher hospitalization rates for older dual eligibles. The quality and/or quantity of services may be inadequate for some HCBS recipients. Hospitalizations are costly to Medicare but also to the HCBS recipient in terms of stress and risks. Although consumer preferences to remain at home may outweigh poor outcomes of HCBS, the full costs and benefits need to be considered. HCBS outcomes—not just expansion—need more attention.     

Local Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services Spending and Nursing Home Admissions of Younger Adults

We used fixed-effect models to examine the relationship between local spending on home- and community-based services (HCBSs) for cash-assisted Medicaid-only disabled (CAMOD) adults and younger adult admissions to nursing homes in the United States during 2001 through 2008, with control for facility and market characteristics and secular trends. We found that increased CAMOD Medicaid HCBS spending at the local level is associated with decreased admissions of younger adults to nursing homes. Our findings suggest that states’ efforts to expand HCBS for this population should continue.Since the 1999 Olmstead decision,1 there has been a number of initiatives aimed to provide individuals with disabilities increased access to long-term care (LTC) options, primarily through expansion in home- and community-based services (HCBSs). Although research has investigated the effect of HCBS growth on the Medicare population of nursing home residents,2–9 there has been little attention given to the relationship between younger nursing home residents and Medicaid HCBS expenditures. As states face growing pressure in how to best allocate their Medicaid budgets, it is important that we have sound research guiding these decisions.Recently, a published study suggested that younger adults’ rates of nursing home admission were not related to Medicaid HCBS spending.10 Two prominent limitations may have led to this null finding: (1) rather than measuring spending for younger adults, the 2011 study used total state Medicaid LTC spending, and (2) the analyses were conducted at the state level, thereby missing market and facility characteristics influencing this relationship. We reexamined this question by using more refined data: Medicaid LTC spending on cash-assisted Medicaid-only disabled (CAMOD) adults at the local level and nursing home admission assessment data aggregated to the facility level. We hypothesized that increasing investment in Medicaid HCBSs for CAMOD adults would be related to a decrease in the share of younger adult nursing home admissions.     

The effects of ownership and ownership change on nursing home industry costs.

OBJECTIVE. This study examines the effects of ownership type and ownership change on nursing home cost structures, differentiating patient care costs from plant costs. DATA SOURCES. Administrative data from the Michigan Department of Social Services, Medical Services Administration (Medicaid), and the Michigan Department of Public Health are used. Cost data are based on audited cost reports for 393 nursing care facilities in Michigan in 1989. Other facility characteristics are based on data from the 1989 annual licensing and certification survey conducted by the Michigan Department of Public Health. STUDY DESIGN. A series of ordinary least squares regressions is estimated, in which the dependent variable is either per diem patient costs or per diem plant costs. Ownership types are defined as chain, proprietary non-chain, freestanding non-profit, government-owned, and hospital-based facilities. Pooled estimation techniques, as well as separate regressions by ownership type, are presented to test for interaction effects. Key variables include whether a facility changed ownership in the preceding five years and whether chain facilities are in-state- or out-of-state-owned, in addition to size, payer mix, and case mix. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS. Behavioral differences among nursing home ownership types in respect to patient care costs tended to distinguish government-owned and hospital-based facilities from the freestanding homes rather than the usual distinction between for-profit and not-for-profit classes. Variables traditionally included in nursing home cost studies, such as size, occupancy, payer mix and case mix, were found to have similar effects on per diem patient care costs for freestanding non-profit homes as well as for chain proprietary facilities. With regard to the effects of ownership change on per diem plant and per diem patient costs, however, there are few differences among ownership types. Chain and non-chain for-profit facilities, non-profit homes, and hospital long-term care units that had changed ownership reported significantly higher per diem plant costs than facilities without a change of ownership, but did not spend more on patient-related costs. Michigan Medicaid plant reimbursement system policy changes instituted in 1985 to promote continued ownership of facilities were not entirely successful. CONCLUSIONS. Non-profit homes look increasingly like their for-profit counterparts with respect to spending on patient care costs. Increased competition for the more lucrative private-pay patients, coupled with declining state Medicaid reimbursement to nursing homes, may have blurred the historical distinctions between the non-profit and for-profit sectors in the nursing home industry. An exception to increasing homogeneity within the nursing home industry is the tendency of proprietary homes to experience more frequent changes of ownership, which results in higher capital costs passed on to state Medicaid programs. Findings from this study indicate that while facility sales increase per diem plant costs, they do not result in increased spending for direct patient care, suggesting that state Medicaid programs may be indirectly subsidizing facility sales with no accompanying increase in expenditures for patient care. To discourage frequent facility sales, state Medicaid programs may need to consider alternative methods of reimbursing nursing home owners for capital costs.     

Reducing potentially preventable hospital transfers: results from a thirty nursing home collaborative

BackgroundNursing home (NH) residents experience frequent hospital transfers, some potentially avoidable. The objective of this report is to describe a replication of the Interventions to Reduce Acute Care Transfers program among member facilities of a New York City area NH provider association (INTERACT NY) and estimate its effect on hospital transfers.MethodsINTERACT is a program that provides tools and strategies to assist NH staff in early identification, communication, and documentation of changes in resident status. Funding was obtained from a New York State health workforce training grant to conduct 13 INTERACT education and training sessions in 2010–2011. INTERACT NY session topics included the implementation process; use of its simple standardized communication tools, advance care planning tools, care paths, and change in condition support tools; quality review of hospital transfers; exercises for refining clinical skills; teamwork; and lessons learned. Sessions engaged NH executives, department heads, front-line nursing staff and their labor union, and staff from NHs’ partner hospitals. Pre-/post- INTERACT NY hospitalization rates per 1000-resident days were compared using paired t-tests, stratified by level of facility engagement with the program and by baseline hospitalization rates.ResultsAll 100% of participating NHs were non-profit or public. Those with complete evaluation data had 377 beds on average. There were a total of 333 attendees of the program (mean 25.6 per session; mean 11.1 per facility over the course of the program; range 1–44 per facility). The most common attendees in order of frequency were (1) nurse administrators, (2) unit-based nurses, (3) medical directors and attending physicians, (4) nursing home administrators, (5) certified nursing assistants, and (6) case managers and social workers. Sixteen nursing homes implemented at least one INTERACT tool. Overall, there was a nonsignificant 10.6% reduction in hospital admissions from 4.07 to 3.64 per 1000 resident-days from pre- to post-INTERACT NY (P = .332). Among nursing homes with high engagement there was a nonsignificant 14.3% reduction in hospital admissions from 4.19 to 3.59 per 1000 resident-days (P = 0.213). Finally, among nursing homes in the highest tertile of baseline (pre-INTERACT NY) hospital admission rate, there was a nonsignificant 27.2% reduction in hospital admissions from 7.32 to 5.33 per 1000 resident-days (P = .102). Planning and implementation lessons from INTERACT NY leaders and participants are reported.ConclusionsINTERACT NY, a novel collaborative training program, resulted in good uptake of the INTERACT tools and processes among its member nursing homes. Changes in hospitalization rates associated with INTERACT NY were similar to those observed in previous implementations of INTERACT. The program addresses a growing interest in reducing potentially preventable hospital admissions among nursing home residents and providing alternatives to hospital care through standardized approaches to communication, early identification of clinical issues, decision-support, and support for partnerships between acute and post-acute care providers.     

Community Discharge Among Post-Acute Nursing Home Residents: An Association With Patient Safety Culture?

ObjectivesWe examined whether better patient safety culture (PSC) in skilled nursing facilities was associated with higher likelihood of successful community discharge for post-acute care residents.DesignCross-sectional study.Setting and ParticipantsMedicare beneficiaries who were newly admitted for post-acute care (N = 53,929) to skilled nursing facilities participating in PSC survey (N = 818).MethodsFacility-level PSC scores were obtained from a national, random survey conducted in 2017. Survey data was linked to Minimum Dataset 3.0, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review, Master Beneficiary Summary File, Nursing Home Compare File, Payroll-Based Journal, and Areal Health Resources File. Successful discharge to community was the outcome of interest. Facility-level PSC scores were the key covariate. We controlled for individual-level, facility-level, and area-level characteristics. Separate logistic regression models for each of the 12 PSC domains and for the overall score were fit.ResultsPost-acute care residents who were successfully discharged to community were more likely to be female (63.7%), white (87.1%), Medicare-only (88.1%), cognitively intact (87.8%), and admitted following a surgery (40.9%) The multivariable analyses showed that teamwork (odds ratio 1.09, P = .02) and supervisor expectations and actions promoting resident safety (odds ratio 1.11, P = .01) were significantly associated with the increased likelihood of successful community discharge.Conclusions and ImplicationsThis is the first study to analyze the relationship between patient safety culture and successful discharge among post-acute care residents. Our results suggest that nursing home leaders may want to focus their quality and safety improvement efforts on specific PSC domains (eg, teamwork) as means for improving community discharge for post-acute care residents.     

Predicting Lawsuits against Nursing Homes in the United States, 1997–2001

Objectives. To examine how nursing home characteristics impacted the number of lawsuits filed against the facilities in the United States during 1997–2001.
Data Sources/Study Setting. A stratified random sample of 2,378 nursing home in 45 states from 1997–2001. Data were obtained from Westlaw's Adverse Filings: Lawsuits database, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) Online Survey, Certification, and Reporting (OSCAR) database, state complaint surveys, and through primary data.
Study Design. Negative binomial regression was used to explain total lawsuit variance by year. Explanatory variables included (a) facility characteristics—including staffing, number of beds, multistate system membership, for-profit ownership, (b) quality indicators—including total number and type of quality survey deficiencies, pressure sore development, and (c) market area—state has resident rights statutes, state complaint information. Resident acuity levels and year effects were controlled for.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Nursing homes were identified and linked to Westlaw data that was searched for the number of lawsuits filed against the home, and then linked to OSCAR data and a primary data analysis of multistate chain membership.
Principal Findings. Staffing levels for certified nursing assistants (CNAs) and registered nurses (RNs) and multistate chain membership were negatively related with higher numbers of lawsuits. More deficiencies on the licensing survey, larger, for-profit nursing homes, and being located in resident rights states were positively related with higher numbers of lawsuits.
Conclusion. This study suggests that nursing homes that meet long-stay staffing standards and minimum quality indicators, are nonprofit, smaller, and not located in resident rights states will experience fewer lawsuits.     

Structure, environment and strategic outcome: a study of Pennsylvania nursing homes.

This study applies Porter's model of competitive advantage to the nursing home industry. Discriminant analysis is used to identify organizational and environmental characteristics associated with nursing homes which have demonstrated valued strategic outcomes, and to distinguish the more successful nursing homes from their rivals. The results of the discriminant analysis suggest that nursing homes with superior payer mix outcomes are distinguishable from their less successful rivals in areas associated with a focused generic strategy. The study suggests that nursing homes which are better staffed, of smaller size and lower price are more likely to achieve high levels of self-pay utilization. Independent living units, continuing care retirement communities in particular, are likely to act synergistically with nursing home organizational characteristics to enhance competitive advantage by linking the value chain of the nursing home to that of retirement housing. Nursing homes with higher proportions of Medicare were found to provide a unique product when compared to their rivals. Profit status does not discriminate better self-pay strategic utilization, but for-profit facilities are more likely to pursue a Medicare strategy. Concern was raised that, as nursing homes become more strategically oriented, Medicaid access may become more problematic.     

Nursing Home Social Services and Post-Acute Care: Does More Qualified Staff Improve Behavioral Symptoms and Reduce Antipsychotic Drug Use?

ObjectivesAn increasing number of post-acute care patients are admitted to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) with behavioral symptoms such as wandering and rejecting care, which can interfere with care and place a patient at risk of social isolation or injury. This study examines whether increasing the qualifications of social service staff through using a greater proportion of qualified social workers (QSWs) instead of paraprofessionals improves patients' behavioral symptoms and reduces the use of antipsychotic medications.DesignSecondary data analysis of national data drawn from the Minimum Data Set, Medicare Beneficiary Summary File, and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting surveys.Setting and participantsNewly admitted, Medicare fee-for-service patients aged ≥65 years who received post-acute care after a hospitalization from 2011-2015 (1,201,096 patient admissions in 5383 unique SNFs).MethodsA regression discontinuity approach is used to identify how changes in the qualifications of social service staffing affect changes in patient outcomes, through exploiting a federal regulation that requires 1 full-time QSW for SNFs with at least 121 beds.ResultsSNFs with a greater proportion of QSWs improved behavioral symptoms that affected residents or others and reduced the use of antipsychotic medications. Marginally significant improvements were also found in patients' rejecting care, wandering, and having any behavioral symptoms. There was no statistically significant change in delusions.Conclusions and implicationsAlthough the focus of most research and effects on improving patient outcomes in SNFs has focused on nursing staff, our results underscore the importance of staffing in social services. Specifically, social service staff with higher qualifications are integral to improving care through reducing patients' behavioral symptoms and avoiding the use of antipsychotic medications. It may be time for SNFs to revisit efforts to improve staffing in social services.     

Decline in Veterans’ Admissions to Nursing Homes during COVID-19: Fewer Beds,More Fear,and Finding Alternative Care Settings

ObjectiveExamine the decline in admission to community nursing homes among Veterans that occurred following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignMultimethods study using Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) purchasing records to examine trends in total admissions and semistructured interviews with staff connected to the VA community nursing home program to contextualize observed trends.Setting and participantsAll VA-paid admissions to community nursing homes (N = 56,720 admissions) and national data on nursing home admissions from LTCFocUS. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 9 VA staff from 4 VA medical centers working in the VA community nursing home program, including social workers, nurses, and program coordinators.ResultsBetween April and December 2020, community nursing home admissions among Veterans were 35% lower compared with the same period in 2019. Nationally, total nursing home admissions decreased by 19.6%. VA community nursing home program staff described 3 themes that contributed to this decline: (1) fewer nursing home beds available, (2) lower admissions due to fear of Veterans being exposed to COVID-19 in nursing homes, and (3) leaving nursing homes in favor of living at home with home-based care.Conclusions and ImplicationsThe decline in nursing home admissions among Veterans raises questions about how replacing nursing home care in favor of home- and community-based care affects the health outcomes and well-being of Veterans and their caregivers.     

Quality of Nursing Homes Among ADRD Residents Newly Admitted From the Community: Does Race Matter?

ObjectiveTo examine racial differences in admissions to high-quality nursing homes (NHs) among residents with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD), and whether such racial differences can be influenced by dementia-related state Medicaid add-on policies.DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.Setting and ParticipantsThe study included 786,096 Medicare beneficiaries with ADRD newly admitted from the community to NHs between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017.Methods2010–2017 Minimum Data Set 3.0, Medicare Beneficiary Summary File, Medicare Provider Analysis and Review, and Nursing Home Compare data were linked. For each individual, we constructed a “choice” set of NHs based on the distance between the NH and an individual residential zip code. McFadden's choice models were estimated to examine the relationship between admission into a high-quality (4- or 5-star) NH and individual characteristics, specifically race, and state Medicaid dementia-related add-on policies.ResultsAmong the identified residents, 89% were White, and 11% were Black. Overall, 50% of White and 35% of Black individuals were admitted to high-quality NHs. Black individuals were more likely to be Medicare-Medicaid dually eligible. Results from McFadden's model suggested that Black individuals were less likely to be admitted to a high-quality NH than White individuals (OR = 0.615, P < .01), and such differences were partially explained by some individual characteristics. Furthermore, we found that the racial difference was reduced in states with dementia-related add-on policies, compared with states without these policies (OR = 1.16, P < .01).Conclusions and ImplicationsBlack individuals with ADRD were less likely to be admitted to high-quality NHs than White individuals. Such difference was partially related to individuals' health conditions, social-economic status, and state Medicaid add-on policies. Policies to reduce barriers to high-quality NHs among Black individuals are necessary to mitigate health inequity in this vulnerable population.     

Evidence on the Effects of the Federal COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate on Nursing Home Staffing Levels

ObjectiveTo assess the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate's effects on nursing homes' nurse aide and licensed nurse staffing levels in states both with and without state-level vaccine mandates.DesignCross-sectional study using data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Economic Innovation Group. Including nursing home facility fixed effects provides evidence on the intertemporal effects of the federal vaccine mandate within nursing homes.Setting and ParticipantsThe sample contains 15,031 nursing homes, representing all US nursing homes with available data.MethodsOn January 13, 2022, the US Supreme Court upheld the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate for health care workers in Medicare- and Medicaid-eligible facilities, with workers generally required to be vaccinated by March 20, 2022 (ie, the compliance date). We examined actual nursing home staffing levels in 3 time periods: (1) pre-Court decision; (2) precompliance date; and (3) postcompliance date. We separately examined staffing levels for nurse aides and licensed nursing staff. Because 28% of nursing homes were in states with state-imposed vaccine mandates that predated the Supreme Court's ruling, we divided the sample into 2 groups (nursing homes in mandate states vs nonmandate states) and performed all analyses separately.ResultsStaff vaccination rates and staffing levels were higher in mandate states than nonmandate states in all 3 time periods. After the Court's decision, staff vaccination rates increased 5% in nonmandate states and 1% in mandate states (on average). We find little evidence that the Court's vaccine mandate ruling materially affected nurse aide and licensed nurse staffing levels, or that nursing homes in mandate states and nonmandate states were differentially affected by the Court's ruling. Staffing levels over time were generally flat, with some evidence of a modestly greater increase for nurse aide staffing in mandate states than nonmandate states, and a modestly smaller decrease for licensed nurse staffing in mandate states than nonmandate states. Finally, regression results suggest that for both nurse aides and licensed nurses, staffing levels were lower in rural and for-profit nursing homes, and higher in Medicare-only, higher quality, and hospital-based nursing homes.Conclusions and ImplicationsResults suggest the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate has not caused clinically material changes in nursing home's nurse aide and licensed nurse staffing levels, which continue to be primarily associated with factors that are well-known to researchers and practitioners.