Feasibility of Auxiliary Partial Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Fulminant Hepatic Failure as an Aid for Small-for-Size Graft: Single Center Experience

Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) or heterotopic auxiliary partial liver transplantation (HAPLT) was initially indicated for potentially reversible fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). We started auxiliary partial living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for FHF in February 2002. Since then, 5 FHF patients (3 females and 2 males) underwent auxiliary partial LDLT: 3 cases of APOLT and 2 cases of HAPLT. All of them received a small-for-size graft: graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) ≤ 1.0%. The etiologies of FHF were hepatitis B virus (HBV) in 1, Wilson's disease in 1, and unknown origin in 3 cases. Three were the acute type and 2 the subacute type of FHF. Median age was 45 years (range, 14-54 years). Blood type was identical in all cases. A left lobe graft was used in 4 instances and a right lobe graft in 1 case. Median GRWR was 0.74 (range, 0.42-0.85). Median follow-up was 42 months (range, 3 days to 70 months). Three of 5 patients (60%) were alive (at 42, 67, and 70 months) and 1 was free of immunosuppression after sufficient recovery of the native liver. Two cases succumbed: 1 at postoperative day 3 because of cytomegalovirus pneumonia and 1 at 10 months after APOLT because of sepsis. Complications were seen in all 5 patients: Relaparotomy for hemostasis in 3, decompression surgery of the abdominal cavity in 1, rehepaticojejunostomy in 1, and biliary strictures in 2 cases. Auxiliary partial LDLT may be a choice as an aid for a small-for-size graft in FHF.     

Immunosuppression withdrawal after auxiliary liver transplantation for acute liver failure

BACKGROUND: The potential for immunosuppression withdrawal is the rationale for auxiliary liver transplantation (AUX) in patients with acute liver failure (ALF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four AUX were performed in 28 adults and 16 children with ALF secondary to seronegative hepatitis (n = 20; 45%), paracetamol hepatotoxicity (n = 14; 32%), acute viral hepatitis (hepatitis B virus [HBV] n = 3, Epstein-Barr virus n = 1; 9%), drug-induced hepatitis (n = 3; 7%), autoimmune hepatitis (n = 2; 5%), and mushroom poisoning (n = 1; 2%). All patients fulfilled the King's College Hospital transplant criteria for ALF. After partial hepatectomy, 38 patients received a segmental auxiliary graft and six, a whole auxiliary graft. Immunosuppression was based on calcineurin inhibitors and steroids. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (77%) are alive after a median follow-up of 30 months (range 4 to 124). Eight adults and two children died of sepsis (n = 6; 14%) at a median interval of 30 days (range 2 to 66), intraoperative cardiac failure (n = 1), brain edema on postoperative day 8 (n = 1), sudden death on day 35 (n = 1), and multiple organ failure associated with HBV recurrence 4 years after transplantation (n = 1). Three patients underwent retransplantation for small-for-size graft syndrome with sepsis on postoperative day 15 (n = 1) and for ductopenic rejection 4 and 15 months after AUX (n = 2). In 10/31 (32%) survivors (6/18 adults and 4/13 children) immunosuppression was completely withdrawn after a median of 19 months. CONCLUSION: Complete immunosuppression withdrawal can be achieved in a significant proportion of patients after AUX for ALF.     

Orthotopic liver transplantation for acute hepatic failure in children

Abstract Thirty children received 35 liver transplants for fulminant or late-onset liver failure between March 1988 and May 1993. Aetiology included non-A non-B hepatitis in 12, Wilson's disease in 8, drug-induced hepatic failure in 6, hepatitis B in 1, hepatitis A in 1, tyrosinaemia in 1 and congenital haemochromatosis in 1. Three patients were retransplanted, one each for hepatic artery thrombosis, non-A non-B graft reinfection, and chronic rejection. Two of these three patients received a third transplant for chronic rejection and hepatic artery thrombosis. One patient in the retransplant group survived. Overall, graft and patient survival at a mean follow-up of 17 months were 49% and 57%, respectively. Mortality was related to vascular complications in three patients (hepatic venous obstruction, portal vein thrombosis and hepatic artery thrombosis). Two patients died of primary sepsis (cerebral aspergillosis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis in association with graft-versus-host disease). Systemic sepsis and multiorgan failure was documented as a cause of death in four children and sepsis in association with chronic rejection in a further three patients. One child died of respiratory failure 4 weeks after transplantation. Mortality in eight children less than 2 years was 75% and this was significantly greater than for older children ( P < 0.003, Mantel Cox). Earlier referral, even in the absence of a definitive diagnosis and particularly in children under 2 years is advisable and may improve survival.     

Incidence and clinical relevance of recurrent hepatitis C infection after orthotopic liver transplantation

Abstract From September 1988 to November 1992 318 liver transplants were performed at our hospital. Of these patients 68 had end-tage cirrhosis due to non-A, non-B, hepatitis, 44 of whom (64.7%) had hepatitis C virus RNA in the serum. Of this subgroup 35 patients (79.5%) were also anti-HCV positive. Postoperatively most recipients remained anti-HCV positive and after 1 year more than 90% had HCV RNA in the serum. About 40% developed a mild, chronic hepatitis and 50% were carriers of HCV without histo-pathological signs. Two patients suffered from a temporary severe acute hepatitis and one patient had a fulminant liver failure due to reinfection. In general, in liver recipients transplanted for end-tage HCV hepatitis there was a high incidence of reinfection with HCV. The clinical course, however, was less severe than in hepatitis B recurrence.     

Isolated Hepatic Chronic Ductopenic Rejection Requiring Liver Retransplant in the Absence of Kidney Graft Rejection After Combined Liver-Kidney Transplant: A Case Report

The liver is considered the most immunotolerant organ among all solid-organ transplants. Liver transplant recipients have a lower incidence of rejection and better outcomes after episodes of rejection, with spontaneous operational tolerance developing in up to 20%. In multiorgan transplants, a protective effect of the liver allograft on simultaneously transplanted organs from the same donor has been demonstrated. We describe an unusual case of isolated liver allograft rejection in a patient with polycystic liver and kidney disease who received a combined liver-kidney transplant from the same donor. After initial discharge from the hospital, our patient had 2 episodes of biopsy-proven late acute cellular rejections, despite higher levels of immunosuppression required for her kidney allograft, which were addressed with pulsed steroid therapy. She had no evidence of ischemic cholangiopathy on imaging. Later, a subsequent liver biopsy demonstrated features consistent with chronic ductopenic rejection. She was eventually listed for liver retransplant and has recently received a second liver transplant while continuing to have no concerns with her kidney allograft function. Examination of the explanted liver confirmed graft loss from chronic ductopenic rejection. The exact reasons why our patient developed acute graft rejection progressing to chronic end-stage rejection of the liver allograft despite not developing graft rejection in the kidney allograft from the same donor remains elusive. Our experience demonstrates that graft tolerance in multiorgan transplant recipients can be organ specific and despite the belief of “immunologic privilege,” isolated liver allograft rejection can occur in multiorgan transplant, resulting in graft loss.     

Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus‐positive recipients in Japan: results of a nationwide survey

A nationwide survey of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐positive recipients was performed in Japan. A total of 514 recipients are reported and included in the study. The cumulative patient survival rate at 5 and 10 years was 72% and 63%, respectively. Of the 514 recipients, 142 patients (28%) died until the end of the observation, among which the leading cause was recurrent hepatitis C (42 cases). According to Cox regression multivariate analysis, donor age (>40), non‐right liver graft, acute rejection episode, and absence of a sustained virologic response were independent prognostic factors. Of the 514 recipients, 361 underwent antiviral treatment mainly with pegylated‐interferon and ribavirin (preemptive treatment in 150 patients and treatment for confirmed recurrent hepatitis in 211). The dose reduction rate and discontinuation rate were 40% and 42%, respectively, with a sustained virologic response rate of 43%. In conclusion, patient survival of HCV‐positive recipients after LDLT was good, with a 10‐year survival of 63%. Right liver graft might be preferable for HCV‐positive recipients in an LDLT setting.     

活体肝移植治疗HBV相关性急性亚急性肝功能衰竭

目的 探讨活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)HBV感染导致的急性肝功能衰竭(acute liver failure,ALF)和亚急性肝功能衰竭(subacute liver failure,SALF)患者的可行性,并评价其疗效.方法 回顾性分析2000年11月至2007年10月完成的10例LDLT治疗ALF、SALF患者的临床资料.10例LDLT的供、受者均为成人,切取右半肝为移植物,8例含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV).10例供者的评估均在确定实施LDLT的24 h内完成,供、受者手术均在确定供者后的12 h内完成.移植物质量与受者体质量比为(1.03±0.17)%(0.86%～1.22%),移植物体积与受者标准肝体积比为(52.2±11.8)%(47.6%～70.1%).结果 10例受者中,2例分别于术后7、28 d时因肺部感染、十二指肠球部溃疡穿孔腹腔感染死亡.1例胆管吻合口胆漏,经十二指肠镜下置入鼻胆管引流治愈.2例术后1周出现轻度急性排斥反应,增强免疫抑制强度后肝功能恢复正常.8例中位随访期9.6个月(2～84个月),生存质量优良.10例供者中,1例出现急性门静脉高压症导致脾脏破裂,行脾脏切除术,其后出现胆管断端胆漏,经鼻胆管引流结合经皮穿刺腹腔引流治愈.其余9例无并发症发生.结论 LDLT适宜治疗HBV感染导致的ALF、SALF,而且能获得较好的中、远期疗效.     

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using left lobes: the importance of surgical modulations on portal graft inflow

BACKGROUND: Due to the shortage of available cadaveric organs, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been recently applied extensively in adults. The use of the left lobe should be encouraged because of donor safety, but frequently the metabolic requirements of severely cirrhotic patients are great and subsequent graft dysfunction is encountered after transplantation. The importance of increased portal inflow to the graft in previously severely cirrhotic patients and other hemodynamic changes in LDLT using left lobes are still under debate, as are the surgical modulations to correct them. In this study, we have reported an initial series of adult-to-adult LDLT using left lobes, underlining the hemodynamic changes encountered during the transplant and the surgical modulations we applied to correct them. METHODS: Eight adult recipients underwent left lobe liver transplantation from living donors. Portal vein pressure and central venous pressure were measured before and after surgical modulation. RESULTS: We encountered four cases of small-for-size syndrome. Two patients were retransplanted; the other two died. Seventy-five percent of our recipients survived and 50% did not require further surgery. CONCLUSION: Surgical portal inflow modulation should be considered in cases of left lobe liver transplantation between adults.     

Critical graft size and functional recovery in living donor liver transplantation

With a high prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and a low cadaveric organ donation rate, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains the only option for many patients in Hong Kong. In such cases, the liver graft volume is smaller owing to a partial liver graft; therefore, a problem of small-for-size grafts often occurs. Between September 1999 and April 2003, 25 cadaveric, 16 living related, and 1 auto-LTs were performed at our center. The outcomes of LDLT were analyzed to assess the critical graft size and functional recovery. Among the 16 LDLT recipients (mean age, 44.4 +/- 14.4 years; mean weight, 61.9 +/- 11.4 kg), 1 patient received a graft from a donor left lobe (weight, 400 g) in an auxillary partial orthotopic LT (APOLT), 12 received right lobes, and 3 received left lobes. Besides the APOLT case, the overall graft/recipient weight ratio (GRWR) for the 15 LDLTs was 1.11 (0.76 to 1.75). The GRWR in the 25 cadaveric LTs was 1.92 (1.05 to 3.69) (P < .001). Among the 12 successful LDLTs, there were 5 (41.7%) cases of small-for-size graft syndrome: 3 of 3 (100%) in GRWR < or = 0.8%; 5 of 6 (83.3%) in GRWR < 1%; and 0 of 6 with GRWR > 1%. The initial post-LT graft function parameters were significantly higher among the LDLT group: International normalized ratio (INR), 1.42 vs 1.24, P = .03; alanine aminotransferase (ALT, 387 vs 201 IU/L, P = .005, and bilirubin, 170 vs 48 micromol/L, P < .001 as compared to the cadaveric transplant group). Small-for-size graft syndrome can be avoided if GRWR > 1%, but often occurs when GRWR < 0.8%. Graft function in LDLT recovers more slowly than in cadaveric liver transplant.     

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation at the Asan Medical Center,Korea

Between February 1997 and December 2001, 311 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplants (A-A LDLTs) were performed at the Asan Medical Center for patients above 20 years of age. Indications for A-A LDLT were: chronic hepatitis B (203), chronic hepatitis C (5), hepatocellular carcinoma (64), alcoholic cirrhosis (9), cryptogenic cirrhosis (4), secondary biliary cirrhosis (5), primary biliary cirrhosis (1), Wilson' s disease (2), autoimmune hepatitis (1), hepatic tuberculosis (1), cholangiocarcinoma (1), fulminant hepatic failure (14) and primary non-function of cadaveric liver graft (1). Of 311 A-A LDLTs, 36 were of medical high urgency, 20 were for acute and subacute hepatic failure, 15 were for hepato-renal syndrome and 1 was for primary non-function. Recipient age ranged from 27 to 64 years. Donor age ranged from 16 to 62 years. There was no donor mortality. Implanted liver grafts were categorized into seven types: 175 modified right lobe (MRL), 70 left lobe, 32 right lobe, 20 dual grafts, 10 left lobe plus caudate lobe, three extended right lobe and one posterior segment. In MRL, the tributaries of the middle hepatic vein were reconstructed by interpositioning a vein graft. Indication for dual graft implantation was the same as single graft A-A LDLT, and four of 20 were emergency cases. Of 20 dual grafts, 14 received two left lobes, four received a left lobe and a lateral segment, one received a right lobe and a left lobe and one received a lateral segment and a posterior segment. Graft volume ranged from 28% to 83% of the standard liver volume of the recipients. There were 33 (10.6%) in-hospital mortalities (< 4 months) among the 310 patients after 311 A-A LDLTs. Of the 36 patients receiving emergency transplants, 31 survived. These encouraging results justify the expansion of A-A LDLT in coping with increasing demands, even in urgent situations. We have aimed to introduce the establishment of the efficacy of A-A LDLT in various end-stage chronic and acute liver diseases, as well as new technical advances to overcome small graft-size syndrome by using dual-graft implantation and MRL, both of which were first developed in our department.     

Long-term outcomes of 600 living donor liver transplants for pediatric patients at a single center.

This report concerns the long-term outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for pediatric patients at a single center. Between June 1990 and December 2003, a total of 600 LDLTs, including 568 primary transplantations and 32 retransplantations, were performed for pediatric patients, who were immunosuppressed with FK506 and low-dose corticosteroids. Patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84.6%, 82.4%, and 77.2%, respectively, and the corresponding findings for graft survivals were 84.1%, 80.9%, and 74.5%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that fulminant hepatic failure (FHF), a graft vs. body weight (GBWR) ratio of <0.8, and ABO-incompatible transplants were independently associated with both patient and graft survival. The retransplantation rate was 6%, and 55 patients (9.7%) have been completely weaned off immunosuppressants. Long-term patient and graft survival after pediatric LDLT for a large cohort of children at our hospital were found to be as good as those for cadaveric liver transplantation, although this series includes 13% liver transplantations with ABO-incompatible donors, which are obviously inferior in patient and graft survival. To obtain better outcomes for patients with FHF and for patients with ABO-incompatible transplants, immunosuppressive therapy needs to be improved.     

Successful cytokine treatment of aplastic anemia following living-related orthotopic liver transplantation for non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis

The relationship between aplastic anemia and viral hepatitis is well recognized, and such patients usually have a high mortality. We successfully treated a case of aplastic anemia following living-related orthotopic liver transplantation (LROLT) for non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis.A 2-yr-old boy with fulminant hepatic failure from non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis received LROLT. Before transplantation, he had pancytopenia which was probably hepatitis associated, and viral suppression was suspected after bone marrow (BM) biopsy. After the transplantation, he developed progressive pancytopenia and a diagnosis of aplastic anemia was made via BM biopsy. With immunosuppressant agents (cyclosporine, methylprednisolone), cytokine therapy (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO)) was effectual and the patient recovered from pancytopenia. He was discharged from the hospital 57 d after the liver transplantation and remains well 1 yr after LROLT. Combined cytokine therapy with high doses of G-CSF, M-CSF and rhEPO appeared to be effective in the treatment of aplastic anemia following liver transplantation for non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis. Since M-CSF activates macrophages, it may have contributed to the graft rejection. Careful consideration should be given to the use of high-dose M-CSF in liver transplant patients.     

Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Kyoto University Experience

Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) was initially indicated as a potentially reversible fulminant hepatic failure and non-cirrhotic metabolic liver disease to compensate for enzyme deficiency without complete removal of the native liver. We expand our indication of APOLT for small-for-size grafts to support the function of implanted grafts during the early post-operative period, and for ABO-incompatibility to sustain a patient's life if the patient has a graft failure. We retrospectively reviewed 31 patients undergoing APOLT from living donor. The indication of APOLT was fulminant hepatic failure in 6, non-cirrhotic metabolic liver disease in 6, small-for-size grafts in 13 and ABO-incompatible cases in 6. The cumulative survival rate for APOLT at 1 and 5 years was 57.9% and 50.6%, and 78.8% and 73.8% for standard LDLT. None of the patients who underwent transplantation with APOLT for fulminant hepatic failure had long-term patient survival. The incidence of acute cellular rejection was higher in APOLT (58.1%) than standard LDLT (35.0%). Biliary complication was higher and the need for retransplantation was greater in APOLT than standard LDLT (p < 0.01). The results suggest that the indications of APOLT should be reconsidered in view of the risk for complications and retransplantation.     

Graft and patient survival after adult live donor liver transplantation compared to a matched cohort who received a deceased donor transplantation.

Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become increasingly common in the United States and around the world. In this study, we compared the outcome of 764 patients who received LDLT in the United States and compared the results with a matched population that received deceased donor transplantation (DDLT) using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. For each LDLT recipient (n = 764), two DDLT recipients (n = 1,470), matched for age, gender, race, diagnosis, and year of transplantation, were selected from the UNOS data after excluding multiple organ transplantation or retransplantation, children, and those with incomplete data. Despite our matching, recipients of LDLT had more stable liver disease, as shown by fewer patients with UNOS status 1 or 2A, in an intensive care unit, or on life support. Creatinine and cold ischemia time were also lower in the LDLT group. Primary graft nonfunction, hyperacute rejection rates, and patient survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis were similar in both groups (2-year survival was 79.0% in LDLT vs. 80.7% in case-controls; P = .5), but graft survival was significantly lower in LDLT (2-year graft survival was 64.4% vs. 73.3%; P < .001). Cox regression (after adjusting for confounding variables) analysis showed that LDLT recipients were 60% more likely to lose their graft compared to DDLT recipients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.6; confidence interval 1.1-2.5). Among hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, LDLT recipients showed lower graft survival when compared to those who received DDLT. In conclusion, short-term patient survival in LDLT is similar to that in the DDLT group, but graft survival is significantly lower in LDLT recipients. LDLT is a reasonable option for patients who are unlikely to receive DDLT in a timely fashion.     

Chronic liver dysfunction in heart transplant recipients, with special reference to viral B, C, and non-A, non-B, non-C hepatitis. A retrospective study in 80 patients with follow-up of 60 months

In order to assess the prevalence, causes, and severity of chronic liver dysfunction (LD) in heart transplant patients, 80 transplanted patients followed for 60 months (median; range, 1.5-98 months) were reviewed. Sustained liver dysfunction was found in 50 patients, occurring during the first year after heart transplantation in 42 (84%) of them. Most patients were asymptomatic (80%). Causes for the liver dysfunction included non-A, non-B hepatitis in 16 cases (32%), viral B hepatitis in 13 (26%), delta hepatitis in one (2%), drug-induced hepatitis in six (12%), and cardiac failure in seven (14%). Anti-HCV antibodies were found in 56.2% of patients with non-A, non-B hepatitis and in 22% of patients with HBV hepatitis. It was found neither in patients with drug-induced hepatitis cardiac failure nor in patients with normal liver tests. This study outlines a high prevalence of LD (62.5%) in heart transplant patients, the high frequency of viral-related chronic LD (usually of moderate severity), and high incidence of HCV and HBV hepatitis.     

Pediatric living‐donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: analysis of 57 cases

We reviewed 57 pediatric patients admitted with acute liver failure to Kyoto University Hospital in Japan over a period of 15 years to compare the etiology and the long‐term outcome of infants and children after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Patients were divided into two groups according to age at the time of liver transplantation, infants group (<1 year, n = 20), and children group (1–18 years, n = 37). The overall survival rates were 73.6%, 69.5% and 67.2% at 1, 5, and 10 years after LDLT respectively. Age of recipients at the time of LDLT had a strong impact on their outcome, Children had significantly better outcome than infants (P = 0.001). Surgical complications were comparable between both groups. Infants had higher rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR), which was associated with features of hepatitis in many cases. Refractory ACR was the leading cause of death in eight out of 12 infants, while it resulted in loss of one child only. Cox’s proportional hazard regression model was used to examine potential risk factors for graft loss and it shows that age <1 year was associated with high risk of graft loss [hazard ratio (HR) = 11.393; CI = 1.961–76.1763] (P < 0.05). In conclusion, Infants had poorer prognosis than children and refractory ACR was the leading cause of death. Using additional immunosuppressant for cases with severe and atypical rejections is recommended.     

Development of pulmonary hypertension in 5 patients after pediatric living-donor liver transplantation: de novo or secondary?

The development of portopulmonary hypertension (PH) in a patient with end-stage liver disease is related to high cardiac output and hyperdynamic circulation. However, PH following liver transplantation is not fully understood. Of 617 pediatric patients receiving transplants between June 1990 and March 2004, 5 (median age 12 yr, median weight 24.5 kg) were revealed to have portopulmonary hypertension (PH) after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), as confirmed by echocardiography and/or right heart catheterization. All children underwent LDLT for post-Kasai biliary atresia. In 2 patients with refractory biliary complications, PH developed following portal thrombosis; 2 with stable graft function, who had had intrapulmonary shunting (IPS) before LDLT, were found to have PH in spite of overcoming liver dysfunction due to hepatitis. PH developed shortly after distal splenorenal shunting in 1 patient, who suffered liver cirrhosis due to an intractable outflow blockage. The onset of PH ranged from 2.8 to 11 yr after LDLT, and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) estimated by echocardiography at the time of presentation ranged from 43 to 120 mmHg. Three of the 5 patients are alive under prostaglandin I2 (PGI2) treatment. Of these, 1 is prepared for retransplantation for an intractable complications of liver allograft, while the other 2 with satisfactory grafts are being considered for lung transplantation. Even after LDLT, PH can develop with portal hypertension. Periodic echocardiography is essential for early detection and treatment of PH especially in the recipients with portal hypertension not only preoperatively but also postoperatively.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation with Special Reference to ABO-incompatible Grafts and Small-for-size Grafts

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has developed on the basis of increased safety of conventional liver surgery and the need for expanding donor sources, especially in children. Indications for LDLT were soon extended to adult patients in Japan, where cadaveric donation was limited. The right liver is now routinely transplanted to adults to avoid small-for-size graft syndrome, even though the right liver graft has the disadvantages of less remaining donor liver and the question of donor safety. Assessing the suitable size or quality of the graft, as well as of the remnant donor liver, is one of the most important problems in adult LDLT. Although several tactics have been proposed to manage the small-for-size syndrome, their efficacy remains a question. We suggest that small-for-size syndrome is preventable by engaging in careful donor selection or using effective agents for hepatic microcirculatory disturbance control. Sometimes for LDLT only ABO-incompatible grafts are available from relatives, but they must be transplanted despite the expected poor outcome in adults and older children. To overcome the problems in this situation, we developed a novel protocol including intraportal infusion therapy with methylprednisolone, prostaglandin E₁, and gabexate mesylate. Two adult patients undergoing ABO- incompatible LDLT have now survived 53 and 35 months after transplantation with good liver function. However, the other two patients suffered thrombotic microangiopathy postoperatively and died owing to cerebral hemorrhage or multiple organ failure, respectively. Further investigation is needed to improve the outcome of liver transplantation across the ABO blood group barrier.This work was supported by grants-in-aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture and the Waksman Foundation of Japan.     

Incidence and Severity of Acute Cellular Rejection in Recipients Undergoing Adult Living Donor or Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation‡

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) may have better immunological outcomes compared to deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after LDLT and DDLT. Data from the adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation (A2ALL) retrospective cohort study on 593 liver transplants done between May 1998 and March 2004 were studied (380 LDLT; 213 DDLT). Median LDLT and DDLT follow‐up was 778 and 713 days, respectively. Rates of clinically treated and biopsy‐proven ACR were compared. There were 174 (46%) LDLT and 80 (38%) DDLT recipients with ≥1 clinically treated episodes of ACR, whereas 103 (27%) LDLT and 58 (27%) DDLT recipients had ≥1 biopsy‐proven ACR episode. A higher proportion of LDLT recipients had clinically treated ACR (p = 0.052), but this difference was largely attributable to one center. There were similar proportions of biopsy‐proven rejection (p = 0.97) and graft loss due to rejection (p = 0.16). Longer cold ischemia time was associated with a higher rate of ACR in both groups despite much shorter median cold ischemia time in LDLT. These data do not show an immunological advantage for LDLT, and therefore do not support the application of unique posttransplant immunosuppression protocols for LDLT recipients.     

血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性肾移植患者临床用药特点

目的 探讨血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性。肾移植患者术后临床用药特点。方法 40例同种异体。肾移植患者，男22例，女18例。年龄30～56岁。其中乙型肝炎感染29例、丙型肝炎感染9例、乙型肝炎合并丙型肝炎感染2例。患者肝功能正常，随机分为普乐可复组（n=20），环孢素A组（n=20）。观察患者术后肝、肾功能情况及人／。肾存活率。结果 40例患者术后随访2年，普乐可复组肝功能异常发生率、急性排斥反应发生率明显低于环孢素A组（分别为15％vs30％，5％vs20％），2组2年人／肾存活率均为100％。结论 血清肝炎病毒标志物阳性患者接受肾移植术后首选普乐可复作为基础免疫制剂方案，可减少排斥反应发生率，对肝脏的损害程度轻。