Evaluation of urine ELISA test for detecting Helicobacter pylori infection in Taiwan： A prospective study

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of a new ELISA (URINELISA) test for detecting Helicobacter pylori(H pylori) antibody in the urine of Taiwanese population. METHODS: In this prospective study, 317 consecutive dyspeptic patients (171 men, 146 women; mean age, 51.0 years) were included. They underwent gastroendoscopy for evaluation. Invasive tests, including culture, histology, and rapid urease test (RUT), and non-invasive ~(13)C-urea breath test were preformed. At the same time, urine specimens were collected for URINELISA. The status of H pylori infection was considered as positive when either culture was positive, or when two of the other, RUT, histology or 13C-UBT, were positive. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of URINELISA are 91.7% (211/230), 90.8% (79/87), 96.3% (211/219), and 80.6% (79/98) respectively. CONCLUSION: This URINELISA test is reliable, inexpensive and easy-to-use. The high diagnostic accuracy warrants the use of URINELISA as a first-line screening tool for diagnosis of H pylori infection in untreated patients.     

粪便抗原检测诊断幽门螺杆菌现症感染

目的 评价应用免疫酶联吸附试验(ELISA)检测粪便中幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori)抗原诊断H.pylori现症感染的敏感性和特异性。方法 应用^14C呼气试验以及幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原(HpSA)试验，对100例因上消化道不适就诊，怀疑有H.pylori感染的患者进行检测，观察两种检查的符合率。结果 ^14C呼气试验和HpSA同时阳性者38例，^14C呼气试验阳性而HpSA阴性者4例；^14C呼气试验和HpSA同时阴性者57例，^14C呼气试验阴性而HpSA阳性1例。以^14C呼气试验作为金标准计算，HpSA检测方法的敏感性为90．48％，特异性为98．28％。结论 幽门螺杆菌抗粪便原检测与^14C呼气试验有较高的符合率，而且简便易行，不需特殊设备，解决了无法进行呼气试验的婴幼儿和有肺部疾患者的非侵人性幽门螺杆菌现症感染诊断问题，是一种非侵入性幽门螺杆菌现症感染诊断的新方法。     

Helicobacter pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test--a simple, accurate and non-invasive test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To access the reliability of a newly developed test, the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) stool antigen (HpSA) test was used for detection of H. pylori infection. METHODOLOGY: Stool specimens were collected from 33 consecutive patients (19 males and 14 females, age range: 16-73 years, mean: 49 years) who received upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination for gastrointestinal symptoms. The H. pylori status was evaluated based on six different tests: culture, histology, biopsy urease test, 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT), serology, and HpSA test. A commercial kit using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay examined HpSA in the stool. H. pylori status was defined as positive when the culture was positive or concordance of three of the other four tests (histology, biopsy urease test, 13C-UBT, and serology) was positive. RESULTS: Twenty patients were diagnosed as H. pylori-positive. The HpSA test was positive in 19 patients and negative in 14 patients. The sensitivity and specificity were 95.0% and 100%, respectively. The overall accuracy rate was 96.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The HpSA test is a new, simple, non-invasive method for accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Evaluation of the two immunochromatographic methods for detecting urine and serum IgG antibodies to Helicobacter pylori and comparison of accuracy and clinical utility

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of two immunochromatographic methods, the STAT-PAK and RAPIRUN tests, in detecting H. pylori antibodies in serum and in urine separately. METHODOLOGY: 130 patients undergoing gastroendoscopy (70 men and 60 women; mean age, 50.6 years) were enrolled in this study. Their H. pylori status was determined based on 4 tests: CLO test, culture, histology and UBT test. The H. pylori positive status was confirmed when the culture was positive, or 2 of the other 3 tests were positive. Serum samples and urine samples were collected. We used the STAT-PAK test for detecting H. pylori antibodies in serum, and read the results 24 hours later. Antibodies were also detected in urine by the RAPIRUN test, with a reading time of 25 minutes. 3 doctors read the results of both tests separately, and a positive result was determined when at least 2 of the doctors read a positive result. RESULTS: In the STAT-PAK pretest using serum samples from 21 randomly selected patients (16 patients with H. pylori infection and 5 patients without infection), the sensitivity at 1-hour and 24-hour reading time was 18.7% and 37.5%. Specificity in both reading times was the same at 100%. Of 129 patients, 82 (64%) were H. pylori infected and 47 (36%) were uninfected. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 31.7%, 93.6%, 89.6% and 44.0% in the STAT-PAK test with a 24-hour reading time, and 93.9%, 85.1%, 91.6%, 88.8% in the RAPIRUN test. One female was excluded because of an invalid urine test. CONCLUSIONS: The urine RAPIRUN test is a faster and more accurate office-based test than the serum STAT-PAK test for detecting the H. pylori infection in untreated patients in Taiwan. The non-invasive urine RAPIRUN test can be used as a large scale screening test for H. pylori status, particularly in children, uncooperative patients, those who have a family history of gastric cancer, or patients who can not tolerate the suffering of endoscopic examination.     

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection by stool antigen test in southern Taiwan

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been found to be associated with various gastrointestinal diseases. Confirmation of H. pylori infection includes invasive and non-invasive methods. There has been increasing interest in noninvasive tests recently. However, the geographical differences among H. pylori strains have been emphasized recently and the H. pylori strain in Taiwan showed a high cagA positive result and different vacA subtype when compared with those of Western countries. The aim of this study is to access and compare the reliability and the diagnostic accuracy of the stool H. pylori antigen tests by spectrophotometry and by the visual method, especially in Southern Taiwan. Thirty-two patients (18 men and 14 women; age range: 23-91 y/o, mean: 50.5 y/o) who underwent gastroendoscopy at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital were enrolled in this study. H. pylori infection status was confirmed by culture or two positive test results on CLO test, histology and 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT). The exclusion criteria included previous gastrointestinal tract surgery, use of antibiotics, proton pump inhibitor or compounds containing bismuth within 1 month of the study. Among them, 14 patients were with duodenal ulcer (DU), 4 with gastric ulcer (GU), 12 with non-ulcer dyspepsia, and 2 with GU and DU. Those patients had their stool collected for ELISA tests of H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA). The HpSA tests were positive in 16 of 18 patients diagnosed as H. pylori positive, and negative in 13 of 14 patients as H. pylori negative. The sensitivity and specificity were 88.9% and 92.9% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.1% and 86.7% respectively. The concordance of HpSA accessed by spectrophotometry and visual method is 100%, which makes this test even easier and cheaper. We concluded that stool HpSA test is a noninvasive, accurate, reliable, rapid and easy way to diagnose H. pylori infection in Southern Taiwan, either by spectrophotometry or by visual assessment.     

Evaluation of 13C-urea breath test to confirm eradication of Helicobacter pylori]

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) for assessment of Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment. One hundred twenty six patients were enrolled with 85 receiving proton pomp inhibitor based triple therapy. They were underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies for diagnosis and assessment of H. pylori infection using culture, histology, rapid urease test (RUT) and 13C-UBT. Assessment of eradication needs to be performed 4 weeks or more after completion of treatment. Breath samples were taken 15 minutes after the ingestion of 100 mg 13C-urea. Breath samples were analyzed on a mass spectrometer system. The gold standard for H. pylori infection was a positive culture or positive histology + positive RUT; negative for infection was defined as negative results of all three biopsy tests. Based on ROC curves, the most appropriate cut-off value for diagnosis of H. pylori infection was identified as 2.5/1000, which provided 96.2% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 96.8% accuracy as judged by the gold standard. However, when confirming the eradication of H. pylori, it was 3.5/1000, which provides for 100%, 95.8%, and 96.5%, respectively. Ten patients (11.8%) had delta13C values that were 2.5-5.0/1000 4-12 weeks after therapy. Eight patients were considered cured of H. pylori infection, and 2 were considered to still have H. pylori infection following 13C-UBT, serology, and H. pylori specific antigen test. The false-positive rate of 13C-UBT was 9.4% (8/85). When the grey zone of 13C-UBT was set at a level of 2.5 to 5.0/1000 (2.5 > : negative, 5.0 < or = : positive) after eradication therapy, the sensitivity and specificity of 13C-UBT was 100% and 98.4% compared to the gold standard. It was concluded that to avoid false-positive results of 13C-UBT, the grey zone of 13C-UBT needs to be set at a level of 2.5 to 5.0/1000; thus improving the accuracy of test for the assessment of eradication of H. pylori infection.     

The clinical utility of string-PCR test in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Non-invasive string test has been reported as being convenient and capable of yielding bacteria by means of gastric juice sampling in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Molecular methods, such as polymerase chain reaction for the amplification of DNA, are desirable for the detection of minute quantities of H. pylori. We planned to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the combination of the string test and polymerase chain reaction and determine whether the string polymerase chain reaction test could obtain more information in conditions where the bacterial load is so low that other diagnostic tests fail to confirm the presence of H. pylori. METHODOLOGY: We enrolled 48 dyspeptic patients, including 29 males and 19 females, with a mean age of 52.5 years. Each patient received endoscopy and biopsy-based tests, including RUT (rapid urease test), cultures, and histology, followed by 13C-UBT (13Carbon urea breath test). We used the string test, (Entero-Test H. pylori, HDC Corporation, CA, US), for gastric juice sampling. The specimen was further analyzed by polymerase chain reaction for the presence of H. pylori with the primer for cagA gene, which is highly prevalent in Taiwan. H. pylori infection was considered as positive when either culture yield was positive, or when two of the other three tests, including RUT, histology, and 13C-UBT, were positive. RESULTS: Of the total 48 patients, 34 patients were H. pylori-positive, and 14 were H. pylori-negative. A fragment of 349 bp of polymerase chain reaction products was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis in 32 out of 34 patients who was classified as H. pylori-positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the string polymerase chain reaction test were 94.12%, 96.97%, 92.86%, and 86.67%, respectively. These results are comparable to 13C-UBT and RUT, and better than histology and culture. One subject, who tested as H. pylori-negative according to the diagnostic criteria, had positive 13C-UBT and string polymerase chain reaction test results. Further sequencing of the DNA obtained from the results of polymerase chain reaction product was performed and it showed 98% identities with the known sequence of cagA strain H. pylori (GenBank accession number: AF249275). CONCLUSIONS: The string polymerase chain reaction test is non-invasive and provides direct bacterial yields. Its diagnostic efficiency is comparable with 13C-UBT and RUT in detecting H. pylori infection. Also, with the assistance of polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing, we can diagnose H. pylori infection even when the bacterial load is low. Further application of string polymerase chain reaction test in the genetic analysis of virulent and resistant strains seems promising.     

Analysis of eight different methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with dyspepsia

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to compare the accuracy of eight different methods for the detection of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in patients with dyspepsia. These tests included culture, histology, rapid urease test (CLO test), serology, saliva IgA, gastric juice IgA, and two in-house methods, namely in-house urease test and Gram stain. METHODS: H. pylori infection was diagnosed prospectively in 200 untreated patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, between July 1999 and August 2001. The gold standard for H. pylori infection was based on a positive culture or both a positive histological examination and CLO test. RESULTS: The culture provided a sensitivity of 55.9% whereas saliva IgA and gastric juice IgA had a sensitivity of 26.8% and 22.2%, respectively. In contrast, the other tests provided satisfactory sensitivities ranging between 89.3% and 100% (Gram stain 89.3%, histology 93.5%, serology 96.8%, CLO test 99.0%, in-house urease test 100%). The specificities of the tests ranged between 75% and 100% (culture 100%, CLO test 91.9%, histology 90.4%, in-house urease test 88.9%, Gram stain 93.5% serology 96.8%, gastric juice IgA 91.7% and saliva IgA 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Majority of invasive and non-invasive tests in this study were accurate for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. However, the secretory IgA-based techniques in saliva and gastric juice seem to be inappropriate for determining H. pylori status in our populations due to their low sensitivities.     

14C-urea breath test for assessment of gastric Helicobacter pylori colonization and eradication.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Urea breath test (UBT) is a reliable noninvasive technique for detecting gastric Helicobacter pylori colonization. 14C isotope-based test requires simple equipment and is inexpensive. We studied the utility of 14C-UBT in diagnosis of gastric H. pylori infection. METHODS: Presence of H. pylori was studied using antral histology and culture in patients with rapid urease test (RUT)-positive peptic ulcer. 14C-UBT was performed using a 185-kBq dose. Radioactivity in 15-min breath samples was measured using a beta-scintillation counter and result expressed as % dose recovered/mmol CO2. H. pylori was considered positive when any two tests were positive. All tests were repeated one month after completion of H. pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: Among 41 patients (duodenal ulcer 36, gastric ulcer 5), H. pylori was detected by histology in 23 (56%) and by culture in 27 (66%). Overall, H. pylori was detected in 28 (68%) patients. Follow-up assessment was possible in 28 patients: 26 cleared the infection (all three tests negative). Mean 14C recovery values at 15 minutes associated with H. pylori-positive status were significantly higher (12.3 [SD 6.8] x 10(-3); n=30; p<0.001) than those associated with H. pylori-negative status (2.1 [0.9] x 10(-3); n=26). Using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis of 15-minute 14C recovery values, a cut-off of 6.5x10(-3) gave the best separation of H. pylori-positive and -negative cases. 14C-UBT had 93% sensitivity, 96% specificity and 95% accuracy. CONCLUSION: 14C-UBT appears to be a reliable noninvasive test for diagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Evaluation of a new biopsy urease test: Pronto Dry, for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: The gastric biopsy urease test is the most frequently used test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in routine gastrointestinal endoscopy practice. In Malaysia up to recently, only one commercial biopsy urease test was available: the CLO test (Ballard Medical Products, Draper, Utah, USA). Large endoscopy units use their own 'homemade' unbuffered ultra rapid urease test for diagnosis of H. pylori infection. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reaction time of a new biopsy urease test, Pronto Dry (Medical Instruments Corporation, Solothurn, Switzerland) and the CLO test in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with dyspepsia to the endoscopy unit, University of Malaya Medical Centre were recruited for the study. Patients who were previously treated for H. pylori infection or who had received antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors or bismuth compounds in the preceding 4 weeks were excluded. H. pylori diagnosis was made based on the ultra rapid urease test and histological examination of gastric biopsies. Four antral and four corpus biopsies were taken for this purpose from all patients. A diagnosis of H. pylori infection was made when both the ultra rapid urease test and histology were positive in either the antral or corpus biopsies. A negative diagnosis of H. pylori was made when both tests from antral and corpus biopsies were all negative. Another four antral and four corpus biopsies (two each) were taken for the Pronto Dry and CLO tests. The Pronto Dry and CLO tests were stored and performed according to the manufacturer's instruction. RESULTS: Two hundred and eight patients were recruited in the study. Eighty-six of the patients were males and 122 were females. The mean age was 46.3 years with a range of 15-82 years. The results for both the Pronto Dry and the CLO tests were completely concordant with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of 98.1%, 100%, 100%, 98.1% and 99%, respectively. The Pronto Dry test showed a faster reaction time to positive compared with the CLO test, with 96.2% positive reaction by 30 min versus 70.8% and 100% positive reaction time by 55 min versus 83%. The colorimetric change was also more distinct with the Pronto Dry test compared with the CLO test. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Pronto Dry and the CLO tests were highly accurate for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. The Pronto Dry test showed a quicker positive reaction time and the positive colour change was more distinct.     

Validation of a simplified 13C-urea breath test method for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection]

OBJECTIVE: To validate a simplified 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) method for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients referred for gastrointestinal endoscopy and biopsy were included, and a 13C-UBT was performed after a 6-hour fast. Breath samples were collected in 10 ml glass tubes before and 30 min after the simultaneous administration of 50 mg of 13C-urea and 2 g of citric acid in 200 ml of water. All breath samples were analyzed using isotope ratio mass spectrometry. The diagnosis of H. pylori infection was established with a positive culture and/or positive histology and serology. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included, 49 female and 39 male with a mean age of 45 +/- 15 yrs. Fifty-one patients (57.95%) were positive and 30 (34.1%) negative for H. pylori. Seven cases (7.95%) were considered undetermined. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for 13C-UBT were 90.2, 93.3, 95.83, and 84.8%, respectively. Accuracy was 91.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The simultaneous administration of 50 mg of 13C-urea and 2 g of citric acid represents an alternative for the non-invasive diagnosis of H. pylori infection.     

Studies of 13C-urea breath test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan

In recent years Helicobacter pylori infection has been implicated in the etiology of a variety of upper gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of this multi-center trial was to search for the cut-off value of the simple ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) for diagnosis of H. pylori infection, and to examine the sensitivity and specificity of ¹³C-UBT for culture, the rapid urease test (CLO test), histology, and serological tests. Two hundred and forty-eight patients participated in this study after giving their informed consent. Endoscopic biopsy specimens were taken from gastric antrum and corpus for culture (190 patients), CLO test (222 patients), and histology (98 patients). A serological test was carried out for all patients. H. pylori infection was established when culture was positive or more than two of the tests, histology, CLO test, and serological test, were positive, and non-infection status was established when the all tests more than two tests were negative. After baseline breath samples were taken, the patients (who had fasted) were given 100 mg of ¹³C-urea in 100 ml water while sitting; they washed out the mouth with water. They were then placed in the left lateral decubitus position for 5 min, and additional breath samples were taken 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min after urea administration, with patients in the sitting position. One hundred and sixty-five of the 248 patients were infected, 48 were not infected, and H. pylori infection status was not evaluated in 35 by endoscopic and serological tests. Breath samples at 20 min were employed to determine the cut-off value. Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, we determined the cut-off value for a positive UBT at 2.5 Δ‰. The sensitivities of UBT for culture, CLO test, histology, and serological test were 98.4%, 98.6%, 100.0%, and 92.5%, and the specificities were 78.8%, 82.5%, 83.3%, and 87.3%, respectively. The cut-off value of 13C-UBT for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection was 2.5 Δ‰; this test is a simple and non-invasive method for the diagnosis of this infection and has high sensitivity and specificity. Received Nov. 18, 1996; accepted June 20, 1997     

Comparison of Helisal Rapid Blood Test and 14C-Urea Breath Test in Determining Helicobacter pylori Status and Predicting Ulcer Disease in Dyspeptic Patients

Objective: Noninvasive tests for Helicobacter pylori are used increasingly. Our aim was to compare the Helisal Rapid Blood (HRB) test and ¹⁴C-urea breath test (UBT) for determining H. pylori status and predicting ulcer disease.
Methods: Three hundred fifty-one consecutive patients with dyspepsia (mean age 40 yr; range 16–77 yr) had an HRB test and UBT followed by endoscopy with biopsies of the antrum and body for histology and antral urease slide test (CLO test). Patients were excluded if they had previously confirmed ulcer disease, gastric surgery, or anti- H. pylori therapy or were taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Results: Sixty-three percent of the patients were "gold standard" H. pylori positive (positive CLO test, positive staining), 34% were gold standard negative (negative CLO test, negative staining), and 3% had conflicting CLO test and histology. The UBT was superior to HRB for determining H. pylori status (sensitivity 98% vs 92%,   p = 0.04  ; specificity 100% vs 69%,   p < 0.001  ). The specificity of the HRB decreased with increasing patient age (74% for age < 46 yr; 57% for age ≥46 yr). A negative UBT was superior to a negative HRB test for predicting the absence of ulcer disease (47% vs 36%;   p < 0.01  ). A positive UBT was similar to a positive HRB in predicting the presence of ulcer disease (92% vs 84%;   p = 0.23  ).
Conclusions: The HRB test is inferior to the UBT for determining H. pylori status. The tests have a similar ability to predict the presence of ulcer disease when positive, but a negative UBT is a better predictor of the absence of ulcer disease.     

幽门螺杆菌感染诊断方法的比较

338例病人同时进行了快速尿素酶试验(简称RUT)。Warthin-Starry染色(简称W-S染色)、培养法、~(13)C-尿素呼气试验(~(13)C-UBT)、血清IgG、IgM等6种诊断方法中任意3种检查,以同时2种(或以上)检查方法一致的结果作为诊断幽门螺杆菌(Hp)是否存在的标准。对上述6种方法的敏感性、特异性、符合率、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别给予评价,结果显示:RUT、W-S染色、~(13)C-UBT三法诊断Hp的敏感性、特异性等较高,均接近或高于90％。     

老年人幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原检测的价值

目的 评价一种新的酶联免疫法检测老年人粪便中幽门螺杆菌（helicobacter pylori,Hp）特异抗原的可靠性和临床应用价值。方法 因上消化道症状行胃镜检查的老年患者共199例，其中既往无胃手术史者151例，胃大部切除术后者48例。均行胃粘膜活检，作快速尿素酶试验（RUT）和组织学检查（W－S染色），以RUT和W－S染色为金标准，两项均阳性（或阴性）诊断为Hp阳性（或阴性）。所有患者均检查幽门螺杆菌粪便抗原（HpSA）和^13C－尿素呼气试验（^13C-UBT），分别与金标准比较，计算其敏感性和特异性。结果 经金标准诊断，无胃手术史患者中Hp阳性81例，阴性70例。HpSA检测的敏感性和特异性分别为96.3%和90.0%，^13C-UBT为92.6%和92.9%，两种方法的敏感性和特异性差异无显著性。胃大部切除术后患者中Hp阳性23例，阴性25例，HpSA检测的敏感性和特异性分别为91.3%和88.0%，^13C-UBT为65.2%和92.0%，两种方法敏感性差异有显著性（P＜0.05）。结论 HpSA在诊断老年人Hp感染方面准确、快速、简便，值得推广。对于胃大部切除术后的老年患者，其诊断Hp的敏感性明显优于^13C-UBT。     

Polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens: comparison with culture,rapid urease test,and histopathological tests.

Ulcer recurrence is probably related to residual Helicobacter pylori (H pylori). Histological examination and culture are considered to be the most specific tests. CLO test is a rapid but less specific test, which is usually used as an alternative test to culture. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of a simplified polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay as a procedure for the diagnosis of gastric H pylori infection of patients. Biopsy specimens were obtained from antral mucosa of 58 patients at endoscopy and submitted to four tests for detection of H pylori. The bacteria were found in 53%, 43%, 48%, and 50% of patients according to the results of PCR, CLO test, culture, and histological examination. Twenty three patients had both negative histology and negative culture and PCR was negative in all of these. Thirteen patients were not classified because only histology or culture was positive and 10 of these had a positive PCR test. When the diagnosis of H pylori was established by agreement with both histology and culture or three positive tests out of four, 29 patients were H pylori positive (28 having had three positive tests and one displaying positive histology and culture), and 26 were negative, and three undetermined. PCR proved the most sensitive and specific test. These results suggest the simplified PCR assay may be a valuable test for the detection of H pylori.     

~(14)C-呼气试验检测幽门螺杆菌感染

本文应用国产~(14)C-呼气试验(~(14)C-UBT)试剂检测幽门螺杆菌(Hp)。同时应用病理组织染色、尿素酶试验、细菌培养和血清 ELISA 技术等方法与之进行比较。117例病人中 Hp 阳性率为47.9%(56/117),~(14)C-UBT的敏感性与特异性分别为94.6%和93.4%。~(14)C-UBT 由于相对于胃镜依赖的方法而言创伤性大大降低,是目前检测 Hp 感染,尤其是药物治疗后复查时的首选方法。     

14C-尿素呼气试验对幽门螺杆菌感染的诊断价值

目的：评估^14C-尿素呼气试验（^14C-UBT）对幽门螺杆菌（HP）感染的诊断价值。方法：对2000例1月内未曾使用可能影响HP检测结果的药物者同步完成快速尿酶试验（RUT）、病理、^14C-UBT检测，以病理（HE染色）、RUT均阳性为诊断HP感染的标准，评价^14C-UBT对HP感染的诊断价值。结果：^14C-UBT的敏感性89.7％，特异性98.4％，阳性预测值98.4％，准确性93.4％，阴性预测值88.1％。结论：^14C-UBT是HP感染无创伤、敏感而特异的诊断方法。     

How to determine the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in the elderly?

PURPOSE: The real prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is difficult to determine in the elderly because of the frequency of drug intake (antibiotics or anti-secretory drugs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of five tests in the elderly. METHODS: The study population consisted of consecutive patients undergoing a routine endoscopy between August 1998 and December 1999. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of four tests in all of the included patients: culture and histology of biopsy specimens, serology (ELISA) and urea breath test (13C-UBT). Detection of H. pylori antigens in stool samples (HpSA) was realized in a subgroup. Patients were considered H. pylori + when result for culture was positive or when two tests were positive. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients were included in this study (55 men, 112 women; mean age: 85.6 +/- 5.1 years). Only 38 (22.8%) patients were H. pylori+. Test performances showed the following results: serology sensitivity: 90.9% (IC 95%: 75.6-98.1) versus 86.9% (IC 95%: 63.6-96.9) for culture versus 77.8% (IC 95%: 60.8-89.9) for histology and 74.3% (IC 95%: 56.7-87.5) for 13C-UBT. Eighty-nine (53.3%) took antibiotics or anti-secretory drugs, only 13C-UBT performances decreased significantly (sensitivity: 94.4% [72.7-99.8] versus 52.9% [27.8-77]; P < 10(-6)). When gastric or duodenal ulcer were endoscopically diagnosed in older patients, both histology and 13C-UBT could not improve the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. HpSA was realized in 107 patients (sensitivity: 74.1%, specificity: 98.7%). We showed no statistical difference between HpSA performances and drug intake. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic performances decreased in older patients especially because of drug intake.     

Capsule 13C-urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To compare the accuracy of capsule 13C-urea breath test (UBT) with conventional invasive methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred patients received CLO test, histological examination, culture and 100- or 50-mg capsule UBT for the diagnosis of H pylori infection. H pylori infection was defined as those with positive culture or positive results from both histology and CLO test. RESULTS: Both the sensitivity and specificity of the 100-mg capsule UBT (n=50) were 100%. The sensitivity and specificity of the 50-mg capsule UBT (n = 50) were 96.4 and 100%, respectively. Taken together, the accuracy of capsule UBT (n =100) was higher than that of CLO test, histology and culture (100% vs 92%, 91% and 89%, respectively; P= 0.035, 0.018 and 0.005, respectively). Our data showed that the optimal timing of sampling for 100-and 50-mg capsule UBT was 15-30 and 6-15 min, respectively. CONCLUSION: Capsule UBT has a higher accuracy compared with biopsy-based tests. It is an ideal method for the diagnosis of H pylori infection.