Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball-retained mandibular overdenture: a 3-year randomized clinical trial

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare marginal bone loss and clinical outcomes of conventionally and immediately loaded two implants supporting a ball‐retained mandibular overdenture. Materials and methods: Thirty six completely edentulous patients (22 males and 14 females) were randomly assigned into two groups. Each patient received two implants in the canine area of the mandible after a minimal flap reflection. Implants were loaded by mandibular overdentures either 3 months (conventional loading group) or the same day (immediate loading group) after implant placement. Ball attachments were used to retain all overdentures to the implants. Vertical and horizontal alveolar bone losses were evaluated in both groups 1 and 3 years after implant placement using multislice computed tomography, which allow evaluation of peri‐implant buccal and lingual alveolar bone. Plaque scores, gingival scores, probing depths and periotest values (PTVs) were evaluated at 4 months (baseline), 1 and 3 years after implant placement. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at distal, labial, mesial and lingual peri‐implant sites. Results: After 3 years of follow‐up period, the immediate loading group recorded significant vertical bone loss at distal and labial sites than the conventional loading group and no significant differences in horizontal bone loss between groups were observed. Probing depth at distal and labial sites in the immediate loading group were higher than the conventional loading group, while plaque scores, gingival scores and PTVs showed no significant differences between the two groups. A low level of positive correlation between plaque scores, gingival scores, probing depths and vertical bone loss was noted. Conclusion: Immediately loaded two implants supporting a ball‐retained mandibular overdenture are associated with more marginal bone resorption and increased probing depths when compared with conventionally loaded implants after 3 years. The bone resorption and probing depths at distal and labial sites are significantly higher than those at mesial and lingual sites. Clinical outcomes do not differ significantly between loading protocols. To cite this article :
Elsyad MA, Al‐Mahdy YF, Fouad MM. Marginal bone loss adjacent to conventional and immediate loaded two implants supporting a ball‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 3‐year randomized clinical trial.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 23, 2012 496‐503.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02173.x     

Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare between the effects of resilient liner and clip attachments of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture on peri‐implant tissues. Materials and methods: In a randomized‐controlled clinical trial, 30 edentulous male patients (mean age 62.5 years) were equally assigned to two groups. In each patient, two implants were inserted in the canine area of the mandible using a two‐stage surgical protocol. After 3 months, the implants were connected with resilient bars. Mandibular overdentures were retained to the bars with either clips (group I) or silicone‐resilient liners (group II). Peri‐implant tissues were evaluated clinically (with regard to plaque scores, gingival scores and probing depths) and radiographically (with regard to peri‐implant vertical and horizontal alveolar bone changes). Evaluations were performed at the time of overdenture insertion (T0), 6 months (T6) and 12 months (T12) after overdenture insertion. Results: After 12 months of using bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, the resilient liner attachment had significantly decreased peri‐implant plaque score, gingival score, probing depth, vertical and horizontal bone loss when compared with the clip attachment. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, and in terms of peri‐implant tissue health of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture, we recommend resilient liner rather than clip attachment. To cite this article:
Elsyad MA, EL Shoukouki AH. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri‐implant tissues of bar‐implant‐retained mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year clinical and radiographical study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 473–480
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01879.x     

Immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by unsplinted direct laser metal-forming implants: results from a 1-year prospective study

Background: At present, only some studies have dealt with immediate loading of unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate treatment outcomes of mandibular overdentures supported by four one‐piece, unsplinted, immediately loaded, direct laser metal‐forming (DLMF) implants by assessing implant survival rate, implant success, marginal bone loss, and prosthetic complications. Methods: A total of 96 one‐piece DLMF implants were inserted in the edentulous mandible of 24 patients. Four implants were placed in each edentulous mandible. Immediately after implant placement, a mandibular overdenture was connected to the implants. At 1‐year follow‐up, clinical, radiographic, and prosthetic parameters were assessed. Success criteria included absence of pain, suppuration, and implant mobility; absence of continuous peri‐implant radiolucency; and distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact <1.5 mm. Results: After a 1‐year loading time, the overall implant survival rate was 98.9%, with only one implant lost. Among the surviving 95 implants, two did not fulfill the success criteria; therefore, the implant success rate was 97.8%. The mean distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact was 0.28 ± 0.30 mm (95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.32). Some prosthetic complications were reported. Conclusion: Based on the present results and within the limits of this study, the immediate loading of four unsplinted DLMF implants by means of ball attachment–supported mandibular overdentures seems to represent a safe and successful procedure.     

Mandibular single‐implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised‐control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems

Objectives: To determine surgical and prosthodontic outcomes of mandibular single‐implant overdentures, opposing complete maxillary dentures, using a wide diameter implant and large ball attachment system compared with different regular diameter implants with standard attachment systems. Materials and methods: Thirty‐six edentulous participants (mean age 68 years, SD 9.2) were randomly assigned into three treatment groups (n=12). A single implant was placed in the mandibular midline of participants to support an overdenture using a 6‐week loading protocol. The control group received Southern regular implants and standard ball attachments. One group received Southern 8‐mm‐wide implants and large ball attachments. Another group received Neoss regular implants and Locator attachments. Parametric and non‐parametric tests of a statistical software package (SPSS) were used to determine between groups differences in marginal bone loss, implant stability, implant, and prosthodontic success (P<0.05). Results: Implant success after 1 year was 75% for Southern regular implant (control) group; and 100% for the Southern wide and Neoss regular implant groups (P=0.038). Mean marginal bone loss at 1 year was 0.19 mm (SD 0.39) without significant differences observed. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) at baseline was significantly lower for the Southern regular (control) group than the other two groups (P=0.001; P=0.009). At 1 year, no significant difference in implant stability was observed (mean ISQ 74.6, SD 6.1). The change in implant stability from baseline to 1 year was significant for the control group (P=0.025). Prosthodontic success was comparable between the groups but the maintenance (41 events overall, mean 1.2) was greater for the Locator and the standard ball attachments. Conclusions: Mandibular single‐implant overdentures are a successful treatment option for older edentulous adults with early loading protocol using implants of different diameters and with different attachment systems. To cite this article:
Alsabeeha NHM, Payne AGT, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single‐implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised‐control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 330–337.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02004.x     

Morse taper connection implants supporting "planned" maxillary and mandibular bar-retained overdentures: a 5-year prospective multicenter study

Objectives: In contrast to the excellent long‐term outcomes described for implant‐supported mandibular overdentures, less favorable long‐term survival and success rates have been reported for maxillary implants supporting overdentures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcome of “planned” bar‐retained maxillary and mandibular overdentures supported by Morse taper connection implants, investigating implant survival, peri‐implant tissue health, marginal bone resorption and prosthetic complications. Material and methods: Over a 2‐year period, 60 patients were enrolled in this study, in four different clinical centers. The overdentures (maxilla 38, mandible 34) were planned with support from four implants anchored on a bar. A total of 288 Morse taper connection implants (Leone Implant System^®) were inserted (152 maxilla, 136 mandible). Implants were evaluated 5 years after insertion. Success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration or clinical mobility, the distance between implant shoulder and first crestal bone–implant contact (DIB) <2 mm and no exudate history. Results: The overall 5‐year implant survival rate was 98% (maxilla 97.4%, mandible 98.6%), with 282 implants still in function. Among these surviving implants, 278 (98.6%) were classified in the success group. At the 5‐year examination, the mean DIB was 0.7 mm (±0.53). Few prosthetic complications were reported. Conclusions: With “planned” bar‐retained maxillary and mandibular overdentures supported by Morse taper connection implants, satisfactory survival and success rate can be achieved. To cite this article:
Mangano C, Mangano F, Shibli JA, Ricci M, Sammons R, Figliuzzi M. Morse taper connection implants supporting “planned” maxillary and mandibular bar‐retained overdentures: a 5‐year prospective multicenter study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1117–1124
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02079.x     

Implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a cross-sectional study

Objective: The aim of this cross‐sectional study was to determine the clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in subjects treated with mandibular overdentures supported by two implants. Material and methods: One hundred and fifty‐nine patients, who received restorative therapy in the edentulous mandible consisting of a bar‐retained overdenture supported by two osseointegrated implants in a private clinic in Italy, were recalled for a clinical and radiographic examination. One hundred and forty‐one subjects with 280 implants attended the examination. The average follow‐up time was 3.9 years. The radiographic examination included assessments of the distance between the implant margin and the most coronal position of bone‐to‐implant contact at the mesial and distal aspects of each implant. A questionnaire regarding comfort, satisfaction with the treatment, aesthetics, speaking capacity and efficiency in chewing was obtained from each subject. Biological and technical complications were recorded and the number of visits due to complications between the delivery of the prostheses and the re‐examination was determined. Results: The results from the examination revealed that the number of lost implants was small and the average marginal bone level around the implants was 0.67 mm apical of the implant margin. The most frequently observed complication was hyperplasia of the mucosal tissue under the bar construction. Few patients experienced loosening of retention. The vast majority of patients reported to be satisfied in relation to the restorative therapy from both functional and aesthetic points of view. Conclusion: Patients with edentulous mandibles may be successfully rehabilitated by means of two implants supporting a bar‐retained overdenture. To cite this article:
Bressan E, Tomasi C, Stellini E, Sivolella S, Favero G, Berglundh T. Implant‐supported mandibular overdentures: a cross‐sectional study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012; 814–819.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02225.x     

Radiological and clinical follow-up of machined- and anodized-surface implants after mean functional loading for 33 months

Abstract: The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare peri‐implant bone loss and mucosal conditions around machined‐surface (MS) and anodized‐surface (AS) interforaminal implants in the mandible at least 30 months after placement. Fifty patients, each treated with four interforaminal screw‐type implants consecutively, were included. Thirty‐one patients (62%) with a total number of 124 implants (64 MS and 60 AS implants, both Brånemark type MKIII) were available for follow‐up. Rotational panoramic radiographs were used for evaluating marginal bone loss. Clinically, marginal plaque index (mPI), bleeding on probing (BOP) and pocket probing depth (PPD) were evaluated. AS implants showed significantly less marginal bone loss than MS implants (−1.17±0.13 vs. −1.42±0.13 mm; P=0.03). Marginal bone loss around distal implants was less pronounced at AS implants (−1.05±0.14 mm) when compared with MS implants (−1.46±0.14 mm; P=0.05). Within the smoking group, there was less peri‐implant bone loss around AS implants than around MS implants (−1.08±0.27 vs. −1.83±0.2; P=0.04). No differences between MS and AS implants were found with respect to mPI (57% vs. 67%), BOP (21% vs. 17%) and mean PPD (2.59±0.29 vs. 2.56±0.28 mm). Overall, both types of implants, in combination with bar‐supported overdentures, can produce excellent long‐term results in the interforaminal edentulous mandible with less peri‐implant bone loss around rough implant surfaces, which had beneficial effects at distal implants and in smokers.     

Peri‐implant parameters in head and neck reconstruction: influence of extraoral skin or intraoral mucosa

Objective: This study is designed to assess dental implants supporting overdentures in edentulous patients with operated head and neck malignancies using parameters to detect peri‐implant disease. Material and methods: Thirty‐four implants supporting overdentures in 34 oral cancer patients were examined. Clinical parameters [plaque index, probing depth, bleeding on probing (BOP), origin of peri‐implant soft tissue, and amount of irradiation] were recorded, and microbiological identification of periodontal pathogens was carried out by DNA–DNA hybridization. To identify yeast species, the samples were cultivated on Sabouraud agar plates and subsequently identified by API 20C AUX plates. An implant site showing BOP, probing pocket depth (PPD)≥5 mm and radiographic vertical bone loss was considered to have peri‐implant disease. Results: Colonization by periodontal pathogens was found on 15 implants, while yeast species were found in 14 cases. Using a univariate analysis, none of the investigated parameters (microbiologic sign, detection of yeast, origin of peri‐implant soft tissue and irradiation) were significantly correlated to signs of peri‐implant disease. In the multivariate analysis, yeast [odds ratio (OR) 12.32, P=0.033] and periodontal pathogen (OR 9.88, P=0.046) were significant predictor variables for peri‐implant disease. Yeasts were less frequently detected around implants placed in re‐vascularized skin flaps if irradiation was set as a confounder (P=0.019). Conclusions: With respect to the pilot study nature of the study peri‐implant soft tissue origin and irradiation had little influence on the development of peri‐implant disease. Yeast and periodontal pathogen were explanatory variables for the development of peri‐implant disease. Considering the effect of irradiation on the prevalence of yeast, yeast was less frequently observed in peri‐implant soft tissue of the skin. Based on these data, future studies on the role of yeast and soft tissue in peri‐implant disease should be encouraged. To cite this article:
Kwon Y‐D, Karbach J, Wagner W, Al‐Nawas B. Peri‐implant parameters in head and neck reconstruction: influence of extraoral skin or intraoral mucosa.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 316–320.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2009.01763.x     

One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: a prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible

Background: Evidence‐based reports are needed to support the application of a one‐stage surgical protocol for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Purpose: To examine the feasibility and success of using two different dental implant systems (originally designed for two‐stage operative technique) using a one‐stage operative procedure in patients being rehabilitated with implant mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: The study sample involved 24 edentulous subjects (aged 55–80 yr) randomly allocated to two different implant systems, one with a machined titanium implant surface (Steri‐Oss, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Ltd., Irene, South Africa). Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all patients, using a standardized one‐stage surgical and prosthodontic procedure. Primary stability and bicortical anchorage of the implants was mandatory before healing abutments were connected at the time of implant placement. Implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period. Data relating to mobility tests, radiographs, and peri‐implant parameters were documented at 12, 16, and 52 weeks after surgery. Results: A success rate of 95.8% for the Steri‐Oss and 100% for the Southern Implants was found, without any statistically significant differences in the marginal bone loss. Significant changes in Periotest values were observed for both types between 12 and 52 weeks (p <.001). Minor changes were observed in the peri‐implant parameters evaluated. Conclusions: These preliminary findings show a successful application of this one‐stage approach for unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures with Steri‐Oss and Southern Implant Systems.     

Locators versus magnetic attachment effect on peri‐implant tissue health of immediate loaded two implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: a 1‐year randomised trial

This study aimed to evaluate peri‐implant tissue health of immediate loaded two implants retaining a mandibular overdenture with either magnetic or locator attachment. Thirty two completely edentulous patients (20 males/12 females) were randomly assigned into two groups. Each patient received two implants in the canine area of the mandible using flapless surgical technique. Mandibular overdentures were immediately connected to the implants with either magnetic (group I, GI) or locator (group II, GII) attachments. Peri‐implant tissue health was evaluated clinically in terms of plaque scores (PI), bleeding scores (BI), probing depth (PD), implant stability (ISQ) and interleukin‐1‐β (IL‐1b) concentrations in peri‐implant sulcular fluid. PI, BI and PD were measured at mesial, distal, buccal and lingual surfaces of each implant. Radiographic evaluation was performed in terms of vertical (VBL) and horizontal (HBLO) alveolar bone loss. Evaluations were performed 2 weeks (T0), 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2) after overdenture insertion. Plague scores, PD, IL‐1b, VBL and HBLO increased significantly with time. ISQ decreased significantly with time. BI showed no significant differences between observation times. GI recorded significant higher PI, ISQ and IL‐1b at T2 compared to GII. GII recorded significant higher VBL than GI at T2 only. For HBLO, no significant differences between groups were noted. VBL and HBLO showed a significant positive correlation with PD. Locator attachments for immediate loaded implants retaining mandibular overdentures are associated with decreased plaque accumulation, decreased implant stability, decreased interleukin‐1β concentration in peri‐implant crevicular fluid and increased per‐implant vertical bone loss compared to magnetic attachments after 1 year.     

One-Year Prospective Evaluation of the Early Loading of Unsplinted Conical Brånemark Fixtures with Mandibular Overdentures Immediately following Surgery

Background: Prospective evaluation of the early loading of unsplinted Branemark implants with mandibular over‐dentures opposing conventional dentures is not evident in the implant‐related literature. Purpose: To clinically evaluate progressive and early loading of 20 unsplinted conical Brånemark implants in edentulous mandibles with overdentures. Materials and Methods: Ten edentulous patients all had two conical Brånemark implants placed in the anterior mandible with mandatory primary stability with bicortical anchorage. Ball abutment connection was performed simultaneously. Previously constructed conventional mandibular dentures were temporarily relined with tissue conditioner postoperatively and worn with moderation for the first 2 weeks to allow progressive loading. Early loading of the implants followed after 2 weeks, with inclusion of the respective matrices in the mandibular dentures, using a definitive reline procedure. Results: All patients successfully functioned with their mandibular implant overdentures from 2 to 52 weeks postoperatively. Mean marginal bone loss was within established criteria for success:0.22 mm (SD = 0.48 mm) mesially and 0.30 mm (SD = 0.39 mm) distally on the conical implants. Mobility tests using the Periotest instrument became more negative, although not at statistically significant levels. Difficulties in the management of the peri‐implant mucosa between surgery and loading at 2 weeks were observed in 40% of the patients. Conclusions: These preliminary 1‐year results show that successful early loading of unsplinted conical Brånemark implants with mandibular overdentures is possible.     

Removable four implant-supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3-year prospective study

Purpose: The present study evaluated implant survival/success rate, peri‐implant parameters and prosthodontic maintenance efforts for four implant‐supported mandibular overdentures (IOD) rigidly retained on either milled bar or double crowns (telescopic) attachments. Material and methods: In a randomized prospective trial, 51 patients with edentulism received four mandibular interforaminal implants and complete maxillary dentures. For IOD, rigid denture stabilization was chosen randomly selecting 26 patients for milled bars (group I) and 25 patients for double (telescopic) crowns (group II). During a 3‐year follow‐up period, implant survival/success, peri‐implant parameters (marginal bone resorption, pocket depth, plaque‐, bleeding‐, gingival index [BI and GI], calculus) and prosthodontic maintenance efforts were evaluated and compared between both retention modalities used. Results: Forty‐five patients (23 group I, 22 group II) were available for a 3‐year follow‐up (dropout rate: 11.8%) presenting a high implant survival/success rate (100%). Peri‐implant marginal bone resorption, pocket depth as well as BI and GI did not differ for both rigid retention modalities. However, annually higher values for plaque‐ (NS) and calculus index (P<0.035) were noticed for the bar (group I) than for the telescopic crown (group II) attachments. Prevalence of prosthodontic maintenance did not differ between both retention modalities (group I: 0.41/maintenance efforts/year/patients vs. group II; 0.45 maintenance/efforts/year/patients). However, prosthodontic adaption for handling mechanism showed benefits for the bar retention. Conclusion: Rigid anchoring of IOD retained either by bar or telescopic attachments showed high implant success rates and minor prosthodontic maintenance efforts regardless of retention modalities used. Stable denture retention presented healthy peri‐implant structure for implants in bar and telescopic anchoring systems. Drawbacks such as higher plaque/calculus for bar retention and less favorable handling properties (output) for telescopic crown attachment leave the decision on the selection at the discretion of the clinician. To cite this article:
Krennmair G, Sütö D, Seemann R, Piehslinger E. Removable four implant‐supported mandibular overdentures rigidly retained with telescopic crowns or milled bars: a 3‐year prospective study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 23 , 2012 481–488.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02169.x     

Implant-supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: 8-year prospective results

Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the long‐term survival and success rates of implants and screw‐retained, full‐arch prostheses placed in edentulous maxillae over 8 years of function. Materials and methods: A total of 106 Astra Tech implants were placed in the maxillae of 17 edentulous patients in a one‐stage surgical approach. After a healing period of 6 months, the patients received fixed screw‐retained bridges. Follow‐up visits, including clinical and radiographic examinations, were performed after 6 months and at yearly intervals. Implant survival, implant success, and marginal bone‐level changes were defined as the primary outcome variables. The secondary aims were to report periodontal pathogens at 5 years' follow‐up and patients' satisfaction at the 8‐year follow‐up. Results: The overall observation time was 8 years. One patient died during the study and one implant failed during the healing period, yielding an 8‐year cumulative implant survival rate of 99%. The prosthetic survival rate was 100%. The mean crestal bone loss amounted to 0.3 ± 0.72 mm. Patients' subjective evaluations demonstrated an overall high level of satisfaction. In all cases, except for one, microbiologic probing of the peri‐implant sulcus after 5 years showed no higher incidence of periodontal pathogens. Conclusions: Screw‐retained, full‐arch restorations on six implants in an edentulous maxilla are a predictable and highly successful treatment concept as observed throughout this study with an observation period of 8 years of function, in particular with respect to low crestal bone loss and high patient satisfaction. To cite this article:
Mertens C, Steveling HG. Implant‐supported fixed prostheses in the edentulous maxilla: 8‐year prospective results.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 464–472
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02028.x     

Implant and root supported overdentures - a literature review and some data on bone loss in edentulous jaws

PURPOSE

To present a literature review on implant overdentures after a brief survey of bone loss after extraction of all teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Papers on alveolar bone loss and implant overdentures have been studied for a narrative review.

RESULTS

Bone loss of the alveolar process after tooth extraction occurs with great individual variation, impossible to predict at the time of extraction. The simplest way to prevent bone loss is to avoid extraction of all teeth. To keep a few teeth and use them or their roots for a tooth or root-supported overdenture substantially reduces bone loss. Jaws with implant-supported prostheses show less bone loss than jaws with conventional dentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures provide patients with better outcomes than do conventional dentures, regarding satisfaction, chewing ability and oral-health-related quality of life. There is no strong evidence for the superiority of one overdenture retention-system over the others regarding patient satisfaction, survival, peri-implant bone loss and relevant clinical factors. Mandibular single midline implant overdentures have shown promising results but long-term results are not yet available. For a maxillary overdenture 4 to 6 implants splinted with a bar provide high survival both for implants and overdenture.

CONCLUSION

In edentulous mandibles, 2-implant overdentures provide excellent long-term success and survival, including patient satisfaction and improved oral functions. To further reduce the costs a single midline implant overdenture can be a promising option. In the maxilla, overdentures supported on 4 to 6 implants splinted with a bar have demonstrated good functional results.     

Outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: results from a 2-year prospective clinical study in humans

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of a surgical procedure based on pocket elimination and bone re‐contouring for the treatment of peri‐implantitis. Material and methods: The 31 subjects involved in this study presented clinical signs of peri‐implantitis at one or more dental implants (i.e. ≥6 mm pockets, bleeding on probing and/or suppuration and radiographic evidence of ≥2 mm bone loss). The patients were treated with a surgical procedure based on pocket elimination and bone re‐contouring and plaque control before and following the surgery. At the time of surgery, the amount of bone loss at implants was recorded. Results: Two years following treatment, 15 (48%) subjects had no signs of peri‐implant disease; 24 patients (77%) had no implants with a probing pocket depth of ≥6 mm associated with bleeding and/or suppuration following probing. A total of 36 implants (42%) out of the 86 with initial diagnosis of peri‐implantitis presented peri‐implant disease despite treatment. The proportion of implants that became healthy following treatment was higher for those with minor initial bone loss (2–4 mm bone loss as assessed during surgery) compared with the implants with a bone loss of ≥5 mm (74% vs. 40%). Among the 18 implants with bone loss of ≥7 mm, seven were extracted. Between the 6‐month and the 2‐year examination, healthy implants following treatment tended to remain stable, while deepening of pockets was observed for those implants with residual pockets. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that a surgical procedure based on pocket elimination and bone re‐contouring and plaque control before and following surgery was an effective therapy for treatment of peri‐implantitis for the majority of subjects and implants. However, complete disease resolution at the site level seems to depend on the initial bone loss at implants. Implants with no signs of peri‐implantitis following treatment tended to remain healthy during the 2‐year period, while a tendency for disease progression was observed for the implants that still showed signs of peri‐implant disease following treatment. To cite this article:
Serino G, Turri A. Outcome of surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis: results from a 2‐year prospective clinical study in humans.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1214–1220.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02098.x     

种植套筒冠义齿修复无牙颌的临床效果观察

目的 探讨种植套筒冠义齿修复无牙颌的临床效果.方法 15例无牙颌患者,采用种植套筒冠义齿修复.共完成26件修复体,其中上颌义齿11件,下颌义齿15件.共植入种植体104颗,修复基台研磨后直接作为套筒冠内冠,套筒冠外冠采用失蜡铸造技术加工.修复后平均回访32个月,对所有种植体及上部结构进行临床及影像学检查,并对原总义齿和种植套筒冠义齿满意度进行比较.结果 完成种植体支持修复的26件覆盖义齿,所有上部修复体的外冠与种植体基台间固位较好、义齿稳定,患者对覆盖义齿的舒适度和咀嚼功能满意,在舒适度和咀嚼功能方面,患者的种植套筒冠义齿满意度要高于常规总义齿,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而发音方面二者差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).覆盖义齿在观察时间内未发生松动、折断及损坏,种植体无松动或脱落.随访期内,种植体周围牙槽骨平均垂直骨吸收量约1 mm.结论 本研究结果表明,种植套筒冠义齿修复无牙颌是一种可靠的方法,但仍需要进一步长期观察.     

Maxillary Overdentures Supported by Anteriorly or Posteriorly Placed Implants Opposed by a Natural Dentition in the Mandible: A 1‐Year Prospective Case Series Study

Background: For maxillary overdenture therapy, treatment guidelines are missing. There is a need for longitudinal studies. Purpose: The purpose of this 1‐year prospective case series study was to assess the treatment outcome of maxillary overdentures supported by six dental implants opposed by natural antagonistic teeth in the mandible. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients were treated with a maxillary overdenture supported by six dental implants, either placed in the anterior region (n = 25 patients) or in the posterior region (n = 25 patients). Items of evaluation were the following: survival of implants, condition of hard and soft peri‐implant tissues, and patients' satisfaction. Results: One‐year implant survival rate was 98% in the anterior group and 99.3% in the posterior group. Mean radiographic bone loss in the anterior and posterior groups after 1 year of loading was 0.22 and 0.50 mm, respectively. Mean scores for plaque, calculus, gingiva, bleeding, and pocket probing depth were low, and patients' satisfaction was high, with no differences between the groups. Conclusion: Six dental implants placed in either the anterior region or the posterior region of the edentulous maxilla, connected with a bar, and opposed by antagonistic teeth in the mandible supply a proper base for the support of an overdenture.     

A 2-year prospective study on immediate loading with fluoride-modified implants in the edentulous mandible

Objectives: Chemically modified surfaces were introduced during the last decade to improve indications for implant treatment. The fluoride‐modified implant (Osseospeed^®) was launched in 2004 and clinical studies suggest a more rapid bone formation and stronger bone to implant contact. However, limited clinical data are available on marginal bone loss and the outcome after >1 year under immediate loading conditions is not fully understood. Hence, the purpose of this prospective study was to present implant survival and marginal bone level data when fluoride‐modified implants are supporting a fully functional rehabilitation from the day after surgery in the completely edentulous mandible. Materials and methods: Twenty‐five patients, completely edentulous in the mandible, were consecutively treated with five fluoride‐modified implants that were functionally loaded with a provisional screw retained restoration. Marginal bone loss was measured from day of surgery to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Implants were considered successful after 24 months if radiographic bone loss did not exceed 1 mm and no pain or mobility was caused under a torque of 20 N cm. Statistical analysis was carried out on both patient and implant levels. Results: All implants survived and mean bone loss on implant level after 3, 6, 12 and 24 months was 0.14, 0.13, 0.11 and 0.11 mm, respectively. Bone loss was only statistically significant between baseline and 3 months (P<0.001) and remained unchanged afterward. None of the implants lost >1 mm of bone after 2 years. On the patient level, the mean bone loss after 2 years was 0.12 mm (SD 0.14; range ?0.06 to 0.55) with probing pocket depth 2.45 mm (SD 0.43; range 1.3–3.1) and bleeding index 0.55% (SD 0.34; range 0–1). Conclusion: Immediate loading of fluoride‐modified implants is a predictable treatment yielding a high survival and success rate after 2 years. To cite this article:
Collaert B, Wijnen L, De Bruyn H. A 2‐year prospective study on immediate loading with fluoride‐modified implants in the edentulous mandible.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 22 , 2011; 1111–1116.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.02077.x     

Histological,histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare bone behaviour around an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque with the Astra‐Tech^© implant (control). Materials and methods: In ten 18‐month‐old male minipigs, the last premolars and first molars were extracted to provide space for two implants in each quadrant. A first set of 40 implants were placed 3 months after the extraction and 40 additional implants were installed another 2 months later. The animals were sacrificed 3 months after the first implant installation so that half of the implants had healed for 1 month and the other half for 3 months. Radiological evaluation was performed at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after implant installation. Bone defect depth and area, bone level changes, bone‐to‐implant contact density, and peri‐implant bone fraction were measured histomorphometrically. Results: Radiological analyses revealed a significantly higher bone loss around the experimental implants. Histomorphometric analyses confirmed significantly more bone loss, larger marginal bone defects, and a lower overall peri‐implant bone fraction around the experimental implants. Conclusion: The experimental implant design caused significantly more peri‐implant bone loss compared with the control implant. As strain gauge measurements indicate excessive marginal strains around the experimental implants, osseocompression might have played a role in the observed marginal bone loss. To cite this article:
Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, Ogawa T, Quirynen M, Vandamme K, Jacobs R, Naert I. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 877–884.     

Early loading of unsplinted implants supporting mandibular overdentures using a one-stage operative procedure with two different implant systems: a 2-year report

Background: Step‐wise reduction in loading protocols is necessary to evaluate early loading of implants with mandibular overdentures. Purpose: To compare the success rates of two different dental implant systems following conventional or early loading protocols in patients being rehabilitated with mandibular overdentures. Materials and Methods: Forty‐eight edentulous participants were randomly allocated to two different implant systems: one with a machined titanium implant surface (Sterioss, Nobel Biocare, Yorba Linda, California, USA) and the other with a roughened titanium surface (Southern Implants, Irene, South Africa). For each system, the participants were further divided into control groups, in whom mandibular implant overdentures and their respective matrices were inserted following a standard 12‐week healing period, and test groups, in whom a 6‐week healing period was followed prior to identical loading. Two unsplinted implants to support implant overdentures were placed in the anterior mandible of all participants, using a standardized one‐stage surgical procedure. Mobility tests and marginal bone levels, as well as periimplant parameters, were evaluated at each baseline and 52 and 104 weeks after surgery. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the success rates of the two systems in either control or test groups. At the 2‐year evaluation, a success rate was found of 87.5% and 70.8.% for the control and test Sterioss groups, respectively, and 83.3% and 100% for the control and test Southern Implants groups were observed. For the Sterioss groups, eight implants were lost at an early stage: seven in the test group and one in the control group. For the Southern Implants control and test groups, no failures were seen at any time interval. There were no significant differences in marginal bone loss, Periotest values, and peri‐implant parameters between implant systems or between any of the control or test groups. Conclusions: Early loading, with step‐wise reductions in loading protocols, of unsplinted machined Sterioss and roughened Southern Implants fixtures with mandibular overdentures is possible for up to 2 years.