A Comparison of Five Competing Lymph Node Staging Schemes in a Cohort of Resectable Gastric Cancer Patients

Background

New classifications for lymph node (LN) staging have recently been proposed to improve upon the UICC/AJCC N category staging convention. Ratio-based systems and logarithmic odds (LODDS) scores are two families of novel competing staging systems. We compared UICC/AJCC staging with 5 ratio and LODDS systems in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with resected gastric cancer.

Methods

Using a large population-based dataset, we identified 12,184 nonmetastatic resectable gastric cancer patients between 1988 and 2004. We compared each subject’s UICC/AJCC N stage with five novel staging schemes. We analyzed the OS for each method. Our comparison metric was the log-rank Chi squared statistic; larger Chi squared statistics indicate improvements in N stage discrimination.

Results

Median OS was 2.1 years (95 % CI 2.0–2.2 years), while median patient follow-up for surviving patients was 8.3 years (range, 1 month–22 years). Although all 5 staging systems were either comparable or superior to the UICC/AJCC convention, a LN ratio method outperformed others in N stage discrimination based on log-rank tests for OS. This trend was independent of the number of LNs examined.

Conclusions

Novel LN staging methods have a higher degree of discrimination utility than the UICC/AJCC N convention. These methods may have a role in reducing the prognostic impact of LN count variability. Of the systems assessed, the LN ratio system that assigns greater risk attribution to cases with <16 LNs was the best classification method to predict OS in patients with resectable gastric cancer.     

Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer: Results of a Chinese Single-Institution Study of 1,503 Patients

Aim

To evaluate the prognostic efficacy of the 7th edition tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) classification compared with the 6th edition in gastric cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 1,503 gastric cancer patients undergoing surgical resection were staged using the 6th and 7th edition staging systems. Homogeneity, discriminatory ability, and monotonicity of gradients of the two systems were compared using linear trend χ², likelihood ratio χ² statistics, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) calculations.

Results

Significant differences in 5-year survival rates were observed for the T, N, and M subgroups using the 7th edition system, except for stage N2 and N3 patients in the 6th edition system. There were no significant differences in survival between IB and IIA in the 7th edition system. Patients with stage IV disease due to T4/N3 in the 6th edition system who were downstaged to stage III in the 7th edition system had significantly better survival than those who remained at stage IV. The 7th edition system had higher linear trend and likelihood ratio χ² scores, and smaller AIC values compared with those for the 6th edition, which represented the optimum prognostic stratification.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the 7th edition system performs better than the 6th edition in several aspects.     

Microsatellite Instability Is Associated With a Better Prognosis for Gastric Cancer Patients After Curative Surgery

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is one of the leading mechanisms for the carcinogenesis of gastric cancer. Its prognostic value is controversial.

Methods

Between May 1988 and Oct 2003, a total of 214 gastric cancer patients undergoing curative surgery were enrolled, and their MSI statuses were classified as MSI-H (high) or MSI-L/S (low/stable). The clinicopathologic characteristics of MSI-H and MSI-L/S gastric cancers were compared.

Results

The MSI-H tumors accounted for 11.7?% (n?=?25) of the 214 total gastric cancers. Although not statistically significant, the MSI-H gastric cancers were more frequently located in the lower third of the stomach (64?% vs. 49.2?%) and were more often the intestinal type (72?% vs. 61.4?%) compared to the MSI-L/S gastric cancers. The MSI-H gastric cancers had a significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (68?% vs. 47.6?%, p?=?0.030) and a trend of a better 3-year disease-free survival rate (71.8?% vs. 55.2?%, p?=?0.076) compared to the MSI-L/S gastric cancers. A multivariate analysis revealed that pathologic TNM stage and MSI status were the independent prognostic factors for OS after curative surgery.

Conclusions

Compared to MSI-L/S tumors, MSI-H tumors are associated with a better OS rate for gastric cancer patients after R0 resection.     

Can the new RCP R0/R1 classification predict the clinical outcome in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head?

Purpose

According to the International Union Against Cancer (UICC), R1 is defined as the microscopic presence of tumor cells at the surface of the resection margin (RM). In contrast, the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) suggested to declare R1 already when tumor cells are found within 1?mm of the RM. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of the RM concerning the prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

From 2007 to 2009, 62 patients underwent a curative operation for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The relevance of R status on cumulative overall survival (OS) was assessed on univariate and multivariate analysis for both the classic R classification (UICC) and the suggestion of the RCP.

Results

Following the UICC criteria, a positive RM was detected in 8?%. Along with grading and lymph node ratio, R status revealed a significant impact on OS on univariate and multivariate analysis. Applying the suggestion of the RCP, R1 rate rose to 26?% resulting in no significant impact on OS in univariate analysis.

Conclusions

Our study has shown that the RCP suggestion for R status has no impact on the prognosis of PDAC. In contrast, our data confirmed the UICC R classification of RM as well as N category, grading, and lymph node ratio as significant prognostic factors.     

A New pN Staging System Based on Both the Number and Anatomic Location of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Gastric Cancer

Background

Our aim was to establish a new pN staging system for gastric cancer based on the number and location of metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) and to compare it with other systems.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the prognostic data of 521 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection. Survival analyses were used to establish a pN staging system that considers both the number and location of MLNs and to compare discriminatory ability and monotonicity of gradients (linear trend χ ² score), homogeneity ability (likelihood ratio test), and prognostic stratification ability (Akaike information criterion) between Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) systems.

Results

Cut-point survival analysis divided pN⁺ patients into two groups: Nxn_1~6 and Nxn_≥7. N0, N1, N2, and N3 (the previous classifications) were replaced by N0, N1n_1~6, N2n_1~6, and N1n_≥7 + N2n_≥7 + N3n_1~6 + N3n_≥7, respectively. Compared with two widely used staging systems, the new system had the highest likelihood ratio test [106.06 (new) vs 95.09 (JGCA) vs 94.33 (UICC)] and linear trend χ ² scores [102.30 (new) vs 89.12 (JGCA) vs 86.97(UICC)] and the lowest Akaike information criterion (AIC) score [2,283.88 (new) vs 2,285.31 (JGCA) vs 2,299.88 (UICC)].

Conclusion

A new pN staging system based on the number and location of MLNs is an efficient prognostic indicator of the survival of patients with gastric cancer following radical surgery.     

Prognostic relevance of gastric cancer staging by endoscopic ultrasound

Background

Recent trials and guidelines have established the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable UICC stage II to IV gastric cancers. In this setting, preoperative staging is pivotal for correct patient selection. This cohort study was designed to assess the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and the ability to select correctly patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of survival outcome.

Methods

Eighty-two consecutive Caucasian patients (46 male; median age 72 years) with gastric cancer underwent EUS staging and subsequent surgery without perioperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Patients were followed for a median of 800 days postoperatively. Pathology and EUS UICC and T stages were compared and evaluated as predictors of survival using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis.

Results

The overall accuracy of EUS for UICC classification compared with pathology was 62 %, and the accuracy for delineation of UICC I was 89 %. For the therapeutically relevant differentiation of early gastric cancer (UICC stage I), EUS (mean survival, 2,298 days, R2 = 0.23) and pathology (2,461 days, R2 = 0.24) predicted survival equally well. Similar results were obtained for T staging by EUS (mean survival, 2,065 days for uT1/2, R2 = 0.24) or pathology (2,185 days, R2 = 0.22).

Conclusions

EUS identifies the low risk subgroup (uUICC stage I or uT1/2) with similar performance as pUICC stage I or stage pT1/2 in gastric cancer and very similar survival characteristics. EUS thus may be the noninvasive method of choice for preoperative selection of patients for immediate resection versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

The New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Staging System for Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach: Increased Complexity without Clear Improvement in Predictive Accuracy

Purpose

To evaluate the changes in the 7th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for stomach cancer compared to the 6th edition; to compare the predictive accuracy of the two staging systems.

Methods

In a combined database containing 2,196 patients who underwent an R0 resection for gastric adenocarcinoma, differences between the two staging systems were evaluated and stage-specific survival estimates compared. Concordance probability and Brier scores were estimated for both systems to examine the predictive accuracy.

Results

Nodal status cutoff values were changed, leading to a more even distribution for the redefined N1, N2, and N3 group. AJCC 6th edition stage II reflected a highly heterogeneous population, which is now adequately subdivided in the AJCC 7th edition into stages IIA, IIB, and IIIA. The predictive accuracy of N classification improved significantly as measured by concordance. Despite increased complexity, the predictive accuracy of AJCC 7th stage grouping was significantly worse than that of the AJCC 6th edition.

Discussion

The increased complexity of the 7th edition staging system is accompanied by improvements in the predictive value of nodal staging as compared to the 6th edition, but it was no better in overall stage-specific predictive accuracy. Future refinements of the tumor, node, metastasis staging system should consider whether increased complexity is balanced by improved prognostic accuracy.     

Prognostic Significance of Complications after Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer

Background

Postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage were reported to be a major independent prognostic factor for long-term survival in gastrointestinal malignancies. This study sought to clarify the prognostic significance of postoperative inflammatory complications specifically for patients with gastric cancer.

Methods

This study included 1,395 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer from 2005 to 2008. Complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific mortality (DSM) were compared between complication and no-complication groups. Presence of complications was modeled by the Cox proportional hazard model for OS and the Fine and Gray competing risk regression model for DSM to assess the correlation between complication and prognosis.

Results

The median follow-up time was 3.1 years. Two hundred seven patients (14.8 %) had complications of grade 2 or higher. Of 131 patients who died within this period, 87 died of gastric cancer. The 3-year OS in the complication group was 84.1 % compared to 93.1 % in the no-complication group (P < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence of DSM was also significantly worse in patients with complications (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified the same significant increasing risk of complication for both OS (hazard ratio 1.88; 95 % confidence interval 1.26–2.80) and DSM (hazard ratio 1.90; 95 % confidence interval 1.19–3.02).

Conclusions

Postoperative complications that can cause prolonged inflammation have an obvious impact not only on the OS but also on the DSM of patients with gastric cancer even if the tumor is resected curatively.     

Seventh Edition (2010) of the AJCC/UICC Staging System for Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is there Room for Improvement?

Background

The gastric cancer AJCC/UICC staging system recently underwent significant revisions, but studies on Asian patients have reported a lack of adequate discrimination between various consecutive stages. We sought to validate the new system on a U.S. population database.

Methods

California Cancer Registry data linked to the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development discharge abstracts were used to identify patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (esophagogastric junction and gastric cardia tumors excluded) who underwent curative-intent surgical resection in California from 2002 to 2006. AJCC/UICC stage was recalculated based on the latest seventh edition. Overall survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Of 1905 patients analyzed, 54 % were males with a median age of 70 years. Median number of pathologically examined lymph nodes was 12 (range, 1–90); 40 % of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and 31 % received adjuvant radiotherapy. The seventh edition AJCC/UICC system did not distinguish outcome adequately between stages IB and IIA (P = 0.40), or IIB and IIIA (P = 0.34). By merging stage II into 1 category and moving T2N1 to stage IB and T2N2, T1N3 to stage IIIA, we propose a new grouping system with improved discriminatory ability

Conclusions

In this first study validating the new seventh edition AJCC/UICC staging system for gastric cancer on a U.S. population with a relatively limited number of lymph nodes examined, we found stages IB and IIA, as well as IIB and IIIA to perform similarly. We propose a revised stage grouping for the AJCC/UICC staging system that better discriminates between outcomes.     

Anatomic Extent of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: Still Important for Gastric Cancer Prognosis

Background

Currently, gastric cancer staging systems do not consider the anatomic extent of metastatic lymph nodes (mLNs) as a prognostic factor. We therefore investigated the prognostic impact of the anatomic extent of mLNs on gastric cancer.

Methods

The prognoses of 4,043 gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection were analyzed. Patients with mLNs in lymph node (LN) stations 1–6 (n = 1,980) comprised the perigastric LN-positive (PLN) group, and patients with mLNs in LN stations 7–12 and 14 (n = 2,063) were assigned to the extraperigastric LN-positive (ELN) group. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by the Cox proportional hazard model.

Results

The ELN group exhibited worse survival than the PLN group (p < 0.001), although there were differences in their clinicopathological features. When patients were stratified according to tumor-node-metastasis stage, the ELN groups had unfavorable prognoses compared with the PLN groups (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in long-term survival when the nodal stage of the current staging systems were subdivided according to anatomic nodal extent (p < 0.05), although there was a strong association between the probability of having extraperigastric mLNs and N classification. In multivariate analysis using age, gender, tumor size, tumor location, histology, T classification, and the extent of mLNs as covariates, presence of extraperigastric mLNs was an independent prognostic factor (HR 1.89, 95 % CI 1.73–2.07), along with age, tumor size, tumor location, and T classification.

Conclusions

The anatomic extent of mLNs significantly affects patient prognosis. Including the anatomic extent of mLNs in the current staging system may predict gastric cancer prognosis more accurately in patients with the same stage of cancer.     

Posttherapy Nodal Status, Not Graded Histologic Response, Predicts Survival after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been attempted as a means of improving survival of potentially resectable advanced gastric cancer (AGC). In the course of exploring the most promising NAC regimen, a superior surrogate marker reflecting overall survival (OS) is necessary. We investigated prognostic factors in AGC patients who underwent NAC followed by gastric resection and evaluated whether histologic response to NAC was predictive of survival.

Methods

Seventy consecutive patients with gastric cancer treated with NAC followed by surgical resection between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2009, at Osaka National Hospital were identified from a prospective database. Prognostic factors for OS were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Median survival time for all patients was 668?days after surgical resection. Age less than 65?years (hazard ratio 0.463, 95% confidence interval 0.244?C0.879) and pathologic nodal stage of N0?C1 (hazard ratio 0.318, 95% confidence interval 0.160?C0.635) were identified as significant independent prognostic factors for longer OS, whereas graded histologic response of primary tumor to NAC was statistically significant on univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis, as a prognostic factor.

Conclusions

Posttherapy nodal status, not graded histologic response, predicts survival after NAC for AGC and could serve as a reliable surrogate marker for OS in the course of exploring the most promising regimen for NAC.     

Prognostic Impact of Microscopic Tumor Involved Resection Margin in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastric Resection

Background

The prognosis of patients with positive surgical resection margins is dismal in gastric cancer. However, the influence of positive margin itself on prognosis is still uncertain, especially in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aims of the present study were to evaluate the prognostic impact of microscopic tumor involved resection margins in stage III–IV AGC after gastric resection in comparison with other well-known factors.

Methods

Among 1,536 consecutive gastric cancer patients who received intentional curative resection for stage III–IV AGC between April 2001 and December 2011 at the National Cancer Center, 35 patients (2.28 %) had positive resection margins on their final histology. A comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics, recurrence pattern, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) was made between positive margin (PM) patients and negative margin (NM) patients.

Results

Among the 35 PM patients, 15 (42.9 %) had proximal involved margins, 21 (60.0 %) had distal involved margins, and one (2.9 %) had both involved margins. Twenty-eight PM patients (80.0 %) were stage III, and 7 (20.0 %) were stage IV. Recurrence was significantly higher in PM than NM (63.6 % vs. 39.7 %, respectively; p = 0.005). The OS and DFS rates were significantly lower in the PM group than in the NM group (14.9 vs. 36.3 months, p < 0.001 and 11.6 vs. 27.1 months, p = 0.005, respectively). The presence of PM was an independent risk factor for both OS and DFS.

Conclusions

The presence of PM is an independent risk factor for OS and DFS. Considering the prognostic impact of PM, a sufficient resection margin should be ensured when determining the resection line in gastrectomy with curative intent. The reoperation to secure clear resection margins should be considered as a treatment of choice in the case of PM.     

Poor Survival Rate in Patients with Postoperative Intra-Abdominal Infectious Complications Following Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Background

The impact of postoperative complications on recurrence rate and long-term outcome has been reported in patients with colorectal and esophageal cancer, but not in patients with gastric cancer. This study evaluated the impact of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications on long-term survival following curative gastrectomy.

Methods

This study included 765 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2002 and 2006. Patients were divided into 2 groups: with (C-group, n = 81) or without (NC-group, n = 684) intra-abdominal infectious complications. Survival curves were compared between the groups, and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results

Male patients were dominant, and total gastrectomy was frequently performed in the C-group. The pathological stage was more advanced and D2 lymph node dissection and splenectomy were preferred in the C-group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was better in the NC-group (86.8 %) than in the C-group (66.4 %; P < .001). The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was also better in the NC-group (84.5 %) than in the C-group (64.9 %; P < .001). This trend was still observed in stage II and III patients after stratification by pathological stage. Multivariate analysis identified intra-abdominal infectious complication as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio, 2.448; 95 % confidence interval [95 % CI], 1.475–4.060) and RFS (hazard ratio, 2.219; 95 % CI, 1.330–3.409) in patients with advanced disease.

Conclusions

Postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications adversely affect OS and RFS. Meticulous surgery is needed to decrease the complication rate and improve the long-term outcome of patients following curative gastrectomy.     

Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes (LODDS): What Are Their Role in the Prognostic Assessment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma?

Background

Nodal status is an important prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer. Log odds of positive nodes (LODDS) (log of the ratio between the number of positive nodes and the number of negative nodes) are a new effective indicator of prognosis. The aim of the study is to evaluate if LODDS are superior to N stage and lymph nodal ratio (LNR).

Methods

Prognostic efficacy of pN, nodal ratio, and LODDS was analyzed and compared in a group of 177 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative gastrectomy.

Results

pT, pN, LNR, and LODDS were all significantly correlated with 5-year survival. Multivariate analyses showed significant values as prognostic factor for pN, LNR, and LODDS. A Pearson test demonstrated no significant correlation between LODDS and retrieved nodes. In patients with less than 15 examined nodes, LODDS classification and pN were significantly correlated with survival, whereas LNR classification was not significantly related.

Conclusions

LODDS are not correlated with the extension of the lymphadenectomy and are able to predict survival even if less than 15 nodes are examined. They permit an effective prognostic stratification of patients with a nodal ratio approaching 0 and 1. Further studies are needed to clarify their role and if they are capable of guaranteeing some advantages over pN and LNR.     

Prognostic Significance of Perineural Invasion in Patients with Gastric Cancer Who Underwent Curative Resection

Background

The prognostic significance of perineural invasion (PNI) in gastric cancer has been previously investigated in a few studies, but had not reached a consensus. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of PNI in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 238 patients who had undergone curative gastrectomy. Paraffin sections of surgical specimens from all patients were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. PNI was defined when carcinoma cells infiltrated into the perineurium or neural fascicles. PNI and the other prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

PNI was detected as positive in 180 of the 238 patients (75.6%). pT stage, tumor size, lymph node metastasis, clinical stage, tumor differentiation, Borrmann classification, histological type, lymphatic vessel invasion, and blood vessel invasion were closely associated with the presence of PNI. The PNI-positive tumors had significantly larger size and more lymph node metastasis than the PNI-negative tumors (P = .001 and P < .001, respectively). The median survival of the PNI-positive patients was significantly worse than that of the PNI-negative patients (28.1 vs. 64.9 months, P = .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that the positivity of PNI was an independent prognostic factor (P = .02, hazard ratio [HR]: 2.75; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]:1.12–3.13) as were classical clinicopathological features.

Conclusion

Our results showed that the frequency of PNI was high in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy and the proportion of PNI positivity increased with progression and clinical stage of disease. PNI may be useful in detecting patients who had poor prognosis after curative resection in gastric cancer.     

Revisiting the Concept of Lymph Node Metastases of Pancreatic Head Cancer: Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Lymph Node Ratio According to N Stage

Background

Some suggest that metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) may be prognostic of survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, this phenomenon was confused by inclusion of node-negative patients in the analysis. The present study was designed to evaluate the prognostic impact of metastatic LNR and the absolute number of metastatic LNs in patients resected for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Data were collected from 398 patients who underwent curative surgery for pancreatic head cancer at Seoul National University Hospital. Long-term survival was analyzed according to LNR and absolute number of metastatic LNs.

Results

Of the patients, 227 (57.0 %) had LN metastasis. The mean numbers of total retrieved and metastatic LNs were 19.5 and 1.9, respectively, and the mean LNR was 0.11. Median overall survival (OS) of patients was significantly higher in N0 than in N1 patients after curative resection (25.4 vs. 14.8 months, p < 0.001). Median OS was significantly lower in patients with 1 than in those with 0 positive LNs (17.3 vs. 25.4 months, p = 0.001). Among N1 patients, those with 0 < LNR ≤ 0.2 had comparable prognosis than those with >0.2 LNR (median OS 17.2 vs. 12.8 months, p = 0.096), and the number of metastatic LNs did not correlate with median OS (p = 0.365).

Conclusions

The presence of a single positive metastatic LN was associated with significantly poorer OS in patients with pancreatic cancer. When LN metastasis was present, the number of metastatic LNs and LNR had limited prognostic relevance.     

High Survival in Patients Operated for Small Isolated Liver Metastases from Gastric Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study

Background

Although several studies have reported the outcomes of surgery for the treatment of liver metastases of gastric cancer (GLM), indications for liver resection for gastric metastases remain controversial. This study was designed to identify prognostic determinants that identify operable hepatic metastases from gastric cancer and to evaluate the actual targets of surgical therapy.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was performed on outcomes for 24 consecutive patients at five institutions who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer followed by curative hepatectomy for GLM between 2000 and June 2012.

Results

Overall 5-year survival and median survival were 40.1 % and 22.3 months, respectively. Uni- and multivariate analyses showed that liver metastatic tumour size less than 5 cm was the most important predictor of overall survival (OS, p = 0.03). Four patients survived >5 years. Repeat hepatectomy was performed in three patients. Two of these patients have remained disease-free since the repeat hepatectomy.

Conclusions

GLM patients with metastatic tumour diameter less than 5 cm maximum are the best candidates for hepatectomy. Hepatic resection should be considered as an option for gastric cancer patients with liver metastases.     

The Node Ratio as Prognostic Factor after Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer

Introduction

The depth of the tumor invasion and nodal involvement are the two main prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Staging systems differ among countries and new tools are needed to interpret and compare results and to reduce stage migration. The node ratio (NR) has been proposed as a new prognostic factor.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 282 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer at Parma University Hospital between 2000 and 2007. TNM stage, NR, overall survival, survival according to nodal status, and survival according to the total number of nodes retrieved were calculated.

Results

At univariate analysis, the TNM stage, number of metastatic nodes, NR, and depth of tumor invasion, but not the number of nodes retrieved, were significant prognosis factors. Patients with more than 15 nodes retrieved in the specimen survived significantly longer (p?<?0.04). This was confirmed for all N or NR classes within N groups. There was a correlation between the number of nodes retrieved and N but not with the NR category. NR was an independent prognostic factor at Cox regression.

Conclusion

NR is a reliable and sensitive tool to differentiate patients with similar characteristics, probably more so than the TNM system. NR is not strictly related to the number of nodes retrieved and this may potentially decrease the stage migration phenomenon. More trials are needed to validate this factor.     

Outcome of Surgical Resection as a First Line Therapy in T3 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

The T3 category of the 7th Edition of the TNM classification of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has added two factors that do not appear in the 6th Edition, large tumor size (>7 cm) and pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe. These factors are considered to have different biological and clinical features. In the present study we assessed the outcome of surgical resection as a first line therapy for T3 NSCLC.

Methods

A total of 145 patients who were diagnosed according to the TNM 7th Edition with pathologic T3 NSCLC received surgical resection in our institution as a first line treatment. The outcomes of their treatment were analyzed.

Results

The 5-year survival rate was 46.9 %. On the basis of the 6th TNM Edition, the 5-year survival rate was 63.1 % for patients diagnosed with T2 disease (large tumor size), 44.3 % for patients diagnosed with T3 disease, and 33.1 % for patients diagnosed with T4 disease (pulmonary metastasis of the same lobe). There were no significant correlations between these categories and overall survival (OS). Nevertheless, 6th Edition T factors were found to be significantly correlated with lymph node status (p < 0.01). The univariate analyses showed that age, lymph node metastasis, and curative resection had significant effects on OS. In addition, the multivariate analysis identified age and N factor as independent prognostic factors in this cohort.

Conclusions

Indications for surgical resection as a first line therapy in T3 NSCLC should be based on N factors and patient age. Lymph node metastasis, especially N2 disease, was increasingly frequent in patients with 6th Edition T classifications.     

Prognostic Significance of Post-Operative Morbidity Severity Score After Potentially Curative D2 Gastrectomy for Carcinoma

Background

Survival and relapse after gastric cancer surgery are largely attributed to tumor biology and surgical radicality; yet, other prognostic factors have been reported, including respiratory sepsis and anastomotic leakage, but not global morbidity severity score (MSS). The hypothesis tested was that MSS would be associated with both disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

Methods

Consecutive 373 patients undergoing potentially curative surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2016 in a UK cancer network were studied. Complications were defined prospectively as any deviation from a pre-determined post-operative course within 30 days of surgery and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo severity classification (CDSC). Primary outcome measures were DFS and OS.

Results

Post-operative complications were identified in 127 (34.0%) patients, which was associated with 9 (2.4%) post-operative deaths. Five-year DFS and OS were 35.9 and 38.5% for patients with a post-operative complication compared with 59.5 and 61.5% in controls (p?<?0.001, p?=?0.001, respectively). On multivariable DFS analysis, post-operative morbidity [hazard ratio (HR) 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.50, p?=?0.026] was independently associated with poor survival. On multivariable OS analysis, post-operative morbidity HR 2.25 (95% CI 1.04–4.85, p?=?0.039) and CDSC HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.35–2.29, p?<?0.001) were independently associated with poor survival. These associations were also observed in patients with TNM stage I and II disease with morbidity HR 7.06 (95% CI 1.89–26.38, p?=?0.004) and CDSC HR 2.93 (95% CI 1.89–4.55, p?<?0.001) offering independent prognostic value.

Conclusion

Post-operative CDSC was an important independent prognostic factor after potentially curative gastrectomy for carcinoma associated with both DFS and OS. Prehabilitation strategies to minimize complications are warranted.