Failure of clopidogrel to reduce platelet reactivity and activation following standard dosing in elective stenting: implications for thrombotic events and restenosis

There is no information on long-term platelet reactivity and activation following elective stenting in patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. We measured platelet reactivity and activation at baseline and at 2 h, 24 h, 5 days and 30 days following coronary stenting (n = 94). Patients were treated with the standard aspirin (325 mg) and clopidogrel regimen (300 mg load/75 mg qd). Reactivity was measured by aggregation (5 and 20 microM ADP) and activation was determined by the expression of total and active GP IIb/IIIa. Reactivity and activation were defined as heightened when post-stent aggregation and receptor expression exceeded baseline levels, respectively. Prolonged heightened platelet reactivity was detected by both 5 and 20 microM ADP aggregation. Using 20 microM ADP aggregation, heightened reactivity occurred in 55% of patients at 2 h, 26% at 24 h, 21% at 5 days, and 15% at 30 days post-stenting. A high frequency of heightened platelet activation was detected by both total and active GP IIb/IIIa expression. Using expression of the active GP IIb/IIIa receptor as the marker, activation was greater than baseline in 27% of patients at 2 h, 20% at 24 h, 30% at 5 days, and 22% at 30 days post-stenting. This is the first report demonstrating that a significant percentage of patients receiving standard clopidogrel and aspirin therapy for coronary stenting will have post-drug platelet reactivity and activation above baseline that persists for 30 days after the procedure. These finding suggest insufficient platelet inhibition. The clinical importance of these findings should be further investigated to establish the potential link between insufficient platelet inhibition, stent thrombosis, and restenosis.     

Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel compared with aspirin after myocardial infarction: enhanced inhibitory effects of combination therapy

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the inhibitory effects of the combination of two doses of aspirin plus clopidogrel with either drug alone on platelet aggregation and activation. BACKGROUND: Enhanced platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel by aspirin on platelet aggregation and activation are suggested by experimental studies but have not been shown in humans. METHODS: The effects of clopidogrel 75 mg or aspirin 100 (300) mg on platelet aggregation and activation by flow cytometry after stimulation with various agonists were determined in 30 patients with a past history of myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Clopidogrel alone or in combination with aspirin markedly inhibited adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-mediated platelet aggregation compared with monotherapy with aspirin (24.6 +/- 3.3% or 26.6 +/- 2.7% vs. 44.7 +/- 2.9%; p < 0.001). Combined treatment significantly inhibited collagen-induced aggregation compared with aspirin and clopidogrel (16.4 +/- 2.4%, 36.5 +/- 4.2% and 59.3 +/- 5.1%, respectively;, p < 0.001) and resulted in considerable inhibition of aggregation induced by thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP, p < 0.03). Clopidogrel with or without aspirin significantly suppressed expression of platelet activation markers CD 62p, CD 63 and PAC-1 after stimulation with ADP or thrombin (p < 0.001). In addition, the combined treatment was more effective than either agent alone after activation with low dose thrombin (p < 0.05). Both doses of aspirin equally potentiated the platelet inhibitory effects of clopidogrel. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective clinical ex vivo platelet study, clopidogrel was more effective than aspirin in inhibiting ADP-mediated platelet aggregation and activation. Clopidogrel in combination with aspirin showed synergistic inhibitory effects after stimulation with collagen and thrombin compared with monotherapies. Thus, this dual antiplatelet treatment strategy deserves further evaluation in clinical trials for secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina.     

Failure of clopidogrel to reduce platelet reactivity and activation following standard dosing in elective stenting: implications for thrombotic events and restenosis

There is no information on long-term platelet reactivity and activation following elective stenting in patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. We measured platelet reactivity and activation at baseline and at 2 h, 24 h, 5 days and 30 days following coronary stenting (n = 94). Patients were treated with the standard aspirin (325 mg) and clopidogrel regimen (300 mg load/75 mg qd). Reactivity was measured by aggregation (5 and 20 μM ADP) and activation was determined by the expression of total and active GP IIb/IIIa. Reactivity and activation were defined as heightened when post-stent aggregation and receptor expression exceeded baseline levels, respectively. Prolonged heightened platelet reactivity was detected by both 5 and 20 μM ADP aggregation. Using 20 μM ADP aggregation, heightened reactivity occurred in 55% of patients at 2 h, 26% at 24 h, 21% at 5 days, and 15% at 30 days post-stenting. A high frequency of heightened platelet activation was detected by both total and active GP IIb/IIIa expression. Using expression of the active GP IIb/IIIa receptor as the marker, activation was greater than baseline in 27% of patients at 2 h, 20% at 24 h, 30% at 5 days, and 22% at 30 days post-stenting. This is the first report demonstrating that a significant percentage of patients receiving standard clopidogrel and aspirin therapy for coronary stenting will have post-drug platelet reactivity and activation above baseline that persists for 30 days after the procedure. These finding suggest insufficient platelet inhibition. The clinical importance of these findings should be further investigated to establish the potential link between insufficient platelet inhibition, stent thrombosis, and restenosis.     

FcgammaRIIA requires a Gi-dependent pathway for an efficient stimulation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase, calcium mobilization, and platelet aggregation

FcgammaRIIA, the only Fcgamma receptor present in platelets, is involved in heparin-associated thrombocytopenia (HIT). Recently, adenosine diphosphate (ADP) has been shown to play a major role in platelet activation and aggregation induced by FcgammaRIIA cross-linking or by sera from HIT patients. Herein, we investigated the mechanism of action of ADP as a cofactor in FcgammaRIIA-dependent platelet activation, which is classically known to involve tyrosine kinases. We first got pharmacologic evidence that the ADP receptor coupled to Gi was required for HIT sera or FcgammaRIIA clustering-induced platelet secretion and aggregation. Interestingly, the signaling from this ADP receptor could be replaced by triggering another Gi-coupled receptor, the alpha(2A)-adrenergic receptor. ADP scavengers did not significantly affect the tyrosine phosphorylation cascade initiated by FcgammaRIIA cross-linking. Conversely, the Gi-dependent signaling pathway, initiated either by ADP or epinephrine, was required for FcgammaRIIA-mediated phospholipase C activation and calcium mobilization. Indeed, concomitant signaling from Gi and FcgammaRIIA itself was necessary for an efficient synthesis of phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, a second messenger playing a critical role in the process of phospholipase Cgamma2 activation. Altogether, our data demonstrate that converging signaling pathways from Gi and tyrosine kinases are required for platelet secretion and aggregation induced by FcgammaRIIA.     

The P2Y 12 receptor as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease

Coronary thrombosis complicating rupture of atherosclerotic plaque is the predominant cause of acute coronary syndromes and platelets play a crucial role in this thrombus formation. Whilst aspirin has been successful in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, appreciation of its limited antiplatelet effects has stimulated the search for more effective antiplatelet agents. The thienopyridines, ticlopidine and clopidogrel, act, via metabolites, on the platelet ADP receptor subtype now designated P2Y 12 (formerly P 2T , P2T AC , P2Y ADP or P2Y cyc ) and these agents have proven clinical efficacy. Analogues of the natural P2Y 12 receptor antagonist ATP have been developed that act directly on the receptor and have a rapid onset of action. One such antagonist, AR-C69931MX, is being developed for clinical use. AR-C69931MX is a potent antagonist of ADPinduced platelet activation, aggregation and secretion and also antagonises platelet responses, including procoagulant activity, induced by all other agonists in view of the central role of the P2Y 12 receptor in amplifying platelet responses. Phase II studies of intravenous AR-C69931MX in patients with acute coronary syndromes show that this agent has a rapid onset of action, rapidly achieving steady-state inhibition of platelet aggregation, with a half-life of only a few minutes. AR-C69931MX appears to be safe and well tolerated as adjunctive therapy in these patients, and more effective inhibition of platelet function is achieved than with clopidogrel. Orally active ATP analogues are also being developed that may be more effective than clopidogrel. Limitations of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists leave scope for development of alternative antiplatelet agents.     

The effect of clopidogrel, aspirin and both antiplatelet drugs on platelet function in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with platelet hyperactivity. Aspirin and clopidogrel, two platelet inhibitors, act by different mechanisms. Aspirin inhibits thromboxane A2 synthesis and clopidogrel acts on the P2Y12 platelet ADP receptor. We evaluated the effect of clopidogrel (75 mg/day), aspirin (75 mg/day) and then both drugs on several platelet function indices in patients with PAD (n = 20). There was a significant (P = 0.0001) decrease in ADP-induced aggregation, after clopidogrel but not after taking aspirin. Clopidogrel plus aspirin significantly decreased spontaneous platelet aggregation (SPA) (P = 0.01 to P = 0.002) but SPA was not significantly altered by either aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy. Similarly, monotherapy did not inhibit serotonin (5HT)-induced aggregation but there was a sigificant inhibition (P = 0.03 to P < 0.02) after combination therapy. ADP (0.8 microM)-induced platelet shape change (PSC) was significantly inhibited by clopidogrel (P = 0.004) or aspirin (P = 0.01). This was also true for 5HT-induced PSC (clopidogrel, P = 0.01; aspirin, P = 0.03). Soluble P-selectin decreased significantly (from 32 +/- 24 to 25 +/- 17 ng/ml, P = 0.04) with combination therapy. Plasma platelet-derived growth factor and intraplatelet 5HT levels were not altered by combination therapy. In PAD, clopidogrel is a more potent inhibitor of ADP-induced platelet activation than aspirin; combination therapy is more effective than clopidogrel or aspirin monotherapy. These potentially clinically relevant findings should be evaluated in appropriately designed trials.     

Clopidogrel inhibits platelet-leukocyte interactions and thrombin receptor agonist peptide-induced platelet activation in patients with an acute coronary syndrome

OBJECTIVES: We sought to characterize the effects of clopidogrel on the activation of circulating platelets, the activation and aggregation of ex vivo platelets, and the interactions with leukocytes in patients with a non-ST-segment elevation in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). BACKGROUND: The significant benefits of clopidogrel in cardiovascular trials suggest that blockage of the P2Y(12) receptor may be associated with important biologic consequences. METHODS: Blood samples obtained from 23 ACS patients before and 24 h after a loading dose of clopidogrel (300 mg) were analyzed by whole-blood flow cytometry, light transmission aggregometry in platelet-rich plasma, and plasma enzyme-linked immunoassays. A thrombin receptor agonist peptide (TRAP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) were used as agonists. Normal individuals pretreated with aspirin served as controls. RESULTS: Clopidogrel attenuated platelet aggregation to both ADP (10 micromol/l) and TRAP (10 micromol/l) by 22% and P-selectin expression by 16% and 25%, respectively. The drug decreased the excess platelet-monocyte and platelet-neutrophil conjugates found in the blood of ACS patients (p < 0.01) and prevented their formation ex vivo with agonist stimulation. Plasma levels of soluble CD40L were reduced by 27% (p < 0.001) and of soluble P-selectin by 15% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clopidogrel attenuates the agonist effects of ADP and TRAP on platelet secretion, aggregation, and formation of platelet-monocyte and platelet-neutrophil conjugates in patients with ACS. These effects may all contribute to the clinical benefits of the drug in these syndromes.     

Novel Anti-platelet Agents: Focus on Thrombin Receptor Antagonists

Platelets are the key in the pathogenesis of atherothrombotic disease such as acute coronary syndromes, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Current anti-platelet treatments are mainly based on inhibition of two important pathways of platelet activation: thromboxane A2 (TXA2) mediated (aspirin) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP)–P2Y12 receptor mediated (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor). Despite the dual anti-platelet therapy with aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors have reduced ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the rate of recurrent ischemic complication after ACS remains high. Combination of multiple anti-platelet agents is also associated with increased risk of bleeding. Thrombin is a potent platelet agonist and the increase of its activity has been reported in patients with ACS. Platelet effects of thrombin are mediated by protease-activated receptors (PAR), and PAR-1 is the most important receptor in human platelets. Two PAR-1 antagonists, vorapaxar and atopaxar, have undergone clinical investigation. In this review, we will describe the pharmacology of PAR-1 antagonists and will review and discuss results of randomized clinical trials with PAR-1 antagonists.     

How to test the effect of aspirin and clopidogrel in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy?

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is frequently used for the prevention of recurrent ischemic events. Various laboratory methods are used to detect the effect of these drugs administered in monotherapy, however their value in dual therapy has not been explored. Here, we determined which methods used for testing the effect of clopidogrel or aspirin are influenced by the other antiplatelet agent. One arm of the study included 53 ischemic stroke patients being on clopidogrel monotherapy showing effective inhibition of the P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor. Laboratory tests routinely used for the detection of aspirin resistance (arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation/secretion, AA-induced thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) production in platelet-rich plasma and VerifyNow Aspirin assay) were carried out on samples obtained from these patients. The other arm of the study involved 52 patients with coronary artery disease being on aspirin monotherapy. Methods used for testing the effect of clopidogrel (ADP-induced platelet aggregation and secretion, flow cytometric analysis of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation and a newly developed P2Y₁₂-specific platelet aggregation (ADP[PGE₁] test)) were performed on samples obtained from these patients. Clopidogrel monotherapy significantly inhibited AA-induced platelet aggregation and secretion, moreover, AA-induced TXB₂ production was also significantly decreased. VASP phosphorylation and AA-induced platelet aggregation showed fair correlation in patients taking clopidogrel only. Clopidogrel did not inhibit the VerifyNow Aspirin test significantly. Aspirin monotherapy influenced ADP-induced platelet aggregation and secretion, but did not have an effect on VASP phosphorylation and on the ADP[PGE₁] platelet aggregation test.     

The Role of Clopidogrel in the Management of Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease

Antiplatelet therapy plays a pivotal role in the treatment of patients across the entire spectrum of coronary artery disease. Platelets are believed to be integrally involved in both the development and progression of atherosclerotic heart disease, as well as in its acute thrombotic complications. While aspirin remains the traditional antiplatelet agent in patients with CAD, adverse vascular events continue to occur in patients on aspirin therapy. Clopidogrel is a relatively new antiplatelet agent and is currently one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease. As a member of the class of drugs known as the thienopyridines, clopidogrel irreversibly prevents platelet activation by blocking one of the three known adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) receptors on its surface. The findings of a number of seminal clinical trials have expanded the indications for the use of clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease. When used in conjunction with aspirin, these studies have demonstrated an incremental benefit of clopidogrel above and beyond that of aspirin alone. This article reviews the data supporting the use of clopidogrel in patients with atherosclerotic heart disease, and makes recommendations for its use based on the available evidence.     

The thienopyridines

Platelet adhesion, activation, and aggregation are key processes in the pathogenesis of coronary disease. Inhibition of these processes forms the cornerstone of therapy for coronary artery disease and particularly of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aspirin was the only available antiplatelet therapy for over 100 years, and it improves clinical outcome in a wide range of clinical situations. However, aspirin only inhibits platelet activation mediated by thromboxane A2, allowing platelet activation to occur through innumerable other pathways. As a result, adverse ischemic events are common when aspirin alone is used for the treatment of coronary disease, including ACS, during coronary interventions (particularly during stent implantation), and following coronary vascular brachytherapy (VBT). In these clinical situations, the presence of either thrombus, deep injury to the vessel wall, or delayed vascular reendothelialization leads to intense and often prolonged platelet activation, overwhelming the relatively weak effects of aspirin. The development of the thienopyridines, a class of antiplatelet drugs that reduce adenosine diphosphate-(ADP) mediated platelet activation, has significantly improved clinical outcomes in many coronary conditions. Widespread use of ticlopidine, the first available thienopyridine, was limited by frequent side-effects, including life-threatening neutropenia and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Following the introduction of clopidogrel, a thienopyridine with an excellent safety profile, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel has become standard therapy following coronary stent implantation and coronary VBT. In patients presenting with ACS, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin has now been proven to reduce ischemic events. The most important limitation of dual antiplatelet therapy is the increased bleeding risk as compared with aspirin alone, particularly in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting during the index hospitalization. However, for many patients with ACS, combination therapy is appropriate.     

Prasugrel loading dose in diabetic patients with acute STEMI – Always sufficiently effective? Observation in two cases and review of current knowledge

The activation and subsequent platelet aggregation play a key role in the formation of arterial thrombosis and therefore is the key therapeutic target in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes. Dual antiplatelet therapy containing aspirin and P2Y12 ADP receptor antagonist forms currently the basis in acute ST – elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) pharmacological treatment. Nevertheless, there is a wide variability in pharmacodynamic response to administration of clopidogrel, the most frequently used P2Y12 ADP receptor antagonist. High platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration is associated with increased risk of stent thrombosis and points to the suitability of laboratory monitoring of antiplatelet therapy efficacy in clinical practice. Laboratory monitoring of antiplatelet therapy by ex vivo platelet function tests may help to identify individuals with poor antiplatlet response. Recently, there is a growing number of data reporting a failure in antiplatelet response following clopidogrel administration, which is specifically associated with insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. Prasugrel, a new, potent P2Y12 ADP receptor antagonist, provides faster and more consistent inhibition of platelet function compared with clopidogrel. Prasugrel therapy was repeatedly described as an effective method to overcome clopidogrel resistance and prasugrel resistance has not yet been reliably described. We report two cases of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 at the stage of organ complications, in whom a prasugrel loading dose of 60 mg did not reach adequate antiplatelet response in 60 min after prasugrel administration. The antiplatelet response was measured by light transmission aggregometry and by VASP protein phosphorylation assessment.     

Beneficial effect of a loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel on platelet parameters in patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome

INTRODUCTION: Despite the beneficial effect of an aspirin-clopidogrel combination in acute coronary syndrome, the incidence of ischaemic recurrences remains significant and very probably implicates a variability in the response to anti-platelet agents. OBJECTIVE: We sought to demonstrate the evidence for a beneficial effect, in terms of anti-platelet effect, of a higher loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel compared to the usual 300 mg in patients admitted to our centre with acute coronary syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Platelet reactivity was evaluated with the ADP 10_mol test and the degree of platelet activation by the expression of P-selectin. 178 consecutive patients admitted for acute coronary syndrome received 250 mg of intravenous aspirin together with either a loading dose of 300 mg of clopidogrel (n = 104) or 600 mg (n = 74) administered 12 to 24 hours prior to coronary angiography. RESULTS: The patients who received 600 mg of clopidogrel had an average aggregation intensity to ADP and a rate of platelet high reactivity post treatment that was significantly lower [48+20 vs 58+18, p = 0.0011 and 11 patients (15%) vs 26 patients (25%), p = 0.0003 respectively]. The degree of platelet activation evaluated with P-selectin was significantly lower in patients receiving 600mg [0.33 + 0.17 vs 0.50+0.29, p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence for a beneficial effect of a loading dose of 600mg of clopidogrel compared to the usual 300 mg in terms of platelet reactivity and platelet activation post treatment.     

Recurrent arterial thromboses in a woman with heparin induced thrombocytopenia, successfully managed with iloprost followed by clopidogrel. An alternative therapeutic option for heparin induced thrombocytopenia type II syndrome.

In its more severe form heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare immune mediated complication of heparin administration that potentially has catastrophic results, and significant mortality. In view of the severity of this condition it is important for the clinician to maintain a high index of suspicion and get alerted to the HIT syndrome by the precocity of platelet count decrease in any patient group, and especially in those previously exposed to heparin. We report on a 72-year-old woman who developed HIT syndrome that was complicated by recurrent arterial thromboses after receiving postoperative antithrombotic prophylaxis with tinzaparin, a low molecular weight heparin. The patient was successfully treated with iloprost (Ilomedin, iloprost tromethamine, Schering) a stable prostacyclin analogue, at the acute phase of the syndrome, followed by long-term treatment with clopidogrel (Plavix, clopidogrel bisulfate, Sanofi) an inhibitor of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor. Although direct thrombin inhibitors have been proven to be effective for the treatment of HIT thrombosis, they do not completely eliminate the morbidity and mortality of this disorder. Our case report suggests that antithrombotic treatment by targeting of the activated platelets with a potent platelet inhibitor during the acute phase of type II HIT syndrome followed by long-term administration of oral anticoagulation may be an additional, safe and effective therapeutic alternative that merits to be systematically studied.     

Role of platelets and antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular disease

Platelets have a key role in normal hemostasis and in the pathogenesis of atherothrombotic events, such as acute coronary syndrome. Following plaque rupture, platelets adhere to the subendothelial matrix, become activated and then aggregate to form a prothrombotic surface that promotes clot formation and subsequently vascular occlusion. Multiple pathways are involved in platelet activation, including those activated by adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thromboxane A2, epinephrine, serotonin, collagen, and thrombin. Currently, two groups of inhibitors of platelet activation are approved for clinical use in patients with acute coronary syndromes: cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitors, namely aspirin, and oral ADP receptor antagonists such as clopidogrel. These agents have shown improved short- and long-term clinical outcomes but are associated with increased bleeding risk, and the rates of recurrent ischemic events remain high. These considerations underscore the need for novel antiplatelet agents that can provide greater reduction in recurrent atherothrombotic events without increasing the risk of bleeding. Several novel antiplatelet agents are currently under clinical development, such as more potent ADP receptor antagonists and protease-activated receptor-1 antagonists. This article provides an overview of the basic principles of platelet biology and the current status of knowledge on available oral antiplatelet therapy, as well as those under clinical development.     

冠状动脉支架术后三联抗血小板药物治疗对血小板功能的影响

目的探讨三联抗血小板药物治疗对冠状动脉(冠脉)支架术后患者血小板活化和聚集功能的影响。方法120例冠心病行冠脉支架植入术患者,随机分为三联组(阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和西洛他唑)和两联组(阿司匹林和氯吡格雷),三联组于术后第1天起加服西洛他唑。两组分别于术后第1天服用西洛他唑前及第5天测定血小板活化复合物(PAC-1)和CD_(62)p,同时测定5μmol/L及20μmol/L ADP诱导的血小板最大聚集率(MPAR)。结果两组临床基线资料及CD_(62)p、PAC-1和MPAR基线值差异均无统计学意义。分别计算各指标第二次测定值与基线值的差值,两组ΔMPAR差异无统计学意义,但三联组和两联组ΔCD_(62)p和ΔPAC-1分别为[(5.12±11.25)%比(1.08±4.97)%,P＜0.05]和[(12.12±12.30)%比(2.22±15.15)%,P＜0.01]。对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者亚组分析结果表明三联组ΔMPAR(5μmol/L)[(8.68±10.35)％比(2.92±13.06)%,P=0.018]、ΔMPAR(20μmol/L)[(11.05±11.14)%比(5.16±13.27)%,P=0.019]、ΔCD_(62)p[(5.57±12.08)％比(1.35±4.42)%,P=0.028】和ΔPAC-1[(11.62±12.73)%比(1.29±15.73)%,P= 0.001]均显著高于两联组。3个月临床随访显示三联组与两联组主要不良心、脑血管事件发生率分别为0和3.3%(2/60),出血发生率分别为5%(3/60)和3.3%(2/60),均无统计学意义。结论三联抗血小板药物治疗与常规两联治疗相比能更有效地抑制冠脉支架术后血小板活化和聚集,但其疗效和安全性还需大规模临床试验证实。     

The role of adenosine 5'-diphosphate receptor blockade in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Aspirin, which has been the mainstay of antiplatelet agent for many decades, affects a single pathway in the platelet activation process and provides incomplete protection against cardiovascular events. Aspirin also may blunt the hemodynamic effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Dipyridamole may provide some additional benefit, but there is little evidence to suggest its superiority alone or in combination with aspirin compared to standard doses of aspirin. Oral platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, although initially promising, have had disappointing results in recent clinical studies. A new class of medications, the thienopyridines, blocks the activity of platelet adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) receptors, thereby reducing platelet activation. This review discusses the pharmacology, clinical studies, and potential uses of these agents, which include ticlopidine and clopidogrel. ADP inhibitors, by blocking an alternate pathway of platelet activation, are slightly more effective than aspirin in reducing cardiovascular events.     

Aspirin and clopidogrel: a sweeping combination in cardiology

Platelets play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atherothrombosis, believed to be integrally involved in both the development and progression of atherosclerotic heart disease, as well as in its acute thrombotic complications. Antiplatelet therapy constitutes the cornerstone in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes and generally high-risk patients with atherothrombosis. Until recently, long-term antiplatelet therapy for the treatment and prevention of the complications of atherothrombotic disease was traditionally limited to aspirin. The availability of the thienopyridines, in particular clopidogrel, represents an important addition to the physician's armamentarium. Clopidogrel is currently one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease. Aspirin and clopidogrel interfere with platelet activation in complementary, but separate pathways. Aspirin irreversibly inhibits cyclooxygenase, thus preventing the production of thromboxane A(2), which is a prothrombotic and vasoconstrictive substance. Clopidogrel, a newer thienopyridine which has largely supplanted ticlopidine due to a more favorable safety profile, irreversibly prevents platelet activation by blocking one of the three known adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) receptors (the P2Y(12) receptor) on the platelet surface, thus interfering with platelet activation, degranulation and aggregation. Both these antiplatelet agents have a potent protective effect against adverse vascular events, but the combination of these two agents has an even stronger antiplatelet effect translating into superior antithrombotic protection in coronary, cerebral or peripheral arterial disease, without an inordinate increase in bleeding complications. A number of seminal clinical trials have demonstrated and confirmed the incremental benefit and efficacy of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin therapy above and beyond that of aspirin alone, with multiple other important large-scale clinical trials currently ongoing. Newer data are being accumulated from studies where indications for the use of clopidogrel and aspirin continue to expand into other patient groups, rendering this dual antiplatelet drug therapy a sweeping combination in Cardiology. However, important issues remain to be further and more thoroughly explored about the benefit of this antiplatelet drug combination in these other patient groups, such as in patients with heart failure, where preliminary data indicate a favorable effect on thrombotic vascular events, in patients with atrial fibrillation, where there is hope that this combination may replace or be an alternative treatment modality to coumadin in certain subpopulations, in patients undergoing demanding catheter ablation procedures, where data point to a protective effect from thromboembolic events. Another pertaining issue to be further investigated is the occurrence of drug-resistance observed in some patients for both these antithrombotic agents. This article is a comprehensive review of all these data and the landmark trials on the two antiplatelet agents, the issues involved and the current recommendations for their use in patients with atherosclerotic heart disease and other cardiovascular disorders and procedures.     

Clinical importance of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance

Aspirin and clopidogrel are important components of medical therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes, for those who received coronary artery stents and in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke. Despite their use, a significant number of patients experience recurrent adverse ischaemic events. Interindividual variability of platelet aggregation in response to these antiplatelet agents may be an explanation for some of these recurrent events, and small trials have linked "aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance", as measured by platelet function tests, to adverse events. We systematically reviewed all available evidence on the prevalence of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance, their possible risk factors and their association with clinical outcomes. We also identified articles showing possible treatments. After analyzing the data on different laboratory methods, we found that aspirin/clopidogrel resistance seems to be associated with poor clinical outcomes and there is currently no standardized or widely accepted definition of clopidogrel resistance. Therefore, we conclude that specific treatment recommendations are not established for patients who exhibit high platelet reactivity during aspirin/clopidogrel therapy or who have poor platelet inhibition by clopidogrel.