Marginal leakage of class II glass ionomer-composite resin restorations: an in vitro study.

This in vitro study assessed the sealing properties of two metal-reinforced glass ionomer cements, used as "extended bases" in glass ionomer-composite resin restorations. Two class II cavities were prepared in the proximal surfaces of 30 molars. The gingival margin of one was prepared in enamel and the other in cementum/dentin. Fifteen teeth (30 cavities) were restored with Ketac Silver material used as an extended base (group A). In the remaining 15 teeth (30 cavities), the extended base was in Miracle Mix material (group B). All occlusal surfaces were restored with Estilux Posterior Material. The restored teeth were thermocycled, immersed in fuchsin, washed in water, embedded, sectioned, and examined under a dissecting microscope. All restorations with margins in cementum/dentin of group A (Ketac Silver) leaked. No microleakage occurred in 12 of the 30 restorations with margins in cementum/dentin of group B (Miracle Mix). In addition, severe microleakage was present in 24 teeth of group A, as opposed to three in group B. It was concluded that the sealing properties of Miracle Mix material are superior to those of Ketac Silver material, in vitro.     

The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass-ionomer liner.

Incremental placement of composite resin has been suggested to reduce microleakage, particularly at the gingival margin of class 5 cervical restorations. It has become clinically advantageous to place a glass-ionomer liner over dentin to further minimize microleakage resulting from a bond between the dentin and glass ionomer, and glass ionomer and resin. The objective of this study was to compare the microleakage behavior of three hybrid composite/bonding agent systems using bulk and incremental filling techniques utilizing a glass-ionomer liner. This was accomplished in vitro using freshly extracted bovine incisors and a Ca45 radioisotope and autoradiography. Sixty bovine incisors were divided into six experimental groups of 10 specimens per group. Class 5 preparations were cut at the cementoenamel junction and restored with the appropriate combination of Herculite XR/Bondlite, P50/Scotchbond 2, or Pertac Hybrid/Pertac Bond. All teeth were lined with the glass ionomer Ketac Bond before the final restoration was placed. The samples were finished and stored for 24 hours in distilled water before thermocycling. The samples were tested for microleakage using a Ca45 radioisotope technique and autoradiography. Incisal (enamel) and gingival (dentin) margins were scored separately for microleakage but grouped for statistical analysis. Results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. Pertac Hybrid exhibited more leakage than Herculite XR or P50. The difference between microleakage of bulk and incremental filling techniques was only significant for P50.     

In vitro evaluation of microleakage of a flowable composite in Class V restorations

The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage around class V restorations using a flowable composite compared to a hybrid composite. Forty class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 20 human teeth, with occlusal and cervical margins at the enamel and cementum/dentin levels, respectively. Specimens were divided into 2 groups with 10 samples each. Group 1: buccal cavities received Paama 2 (conventional bonding agent) + Wave (flowable composite); lingual cavities were restored with Paama 2 + Glacier (hybrid composite). Group 2: buccal cavities received Optibond Solo (self-priming bonding agent) + Wave; lingual cavities were restored with Optibond Solo + Glacier. After being stored in distilled water and finished, the teeth were thermocycled, immersed in a 50% silver nitrate solution and embedded in resin. They were sectioned and the depth of tracer penetration was scored. The results were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests. The restorations with flowable composite and those with hybrid composite from the same group showed similar results of microleakage for both occlusal and cervical margins. Optibond Solo improved the sealing of the restorations when compared with Paama 2 (p < 0.01). None of the restorative materials completely sealed the tooth/restoration interface at the cervical margins.     

Microleakage in class V gingiva-shaded composite resin restorations

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage in Class V cavities restored with a new gingiva-shaded microhybrid composite resin and with a conventional microhybrid composite resin using three different dentin bonding systems (DBS). Class V cavities were prepared in sixty freshly extracted human teeth with the incisal margin in enamel and the apical margin in dentin/cementum. Restored specimens, after thermocycling, were placed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. Longitudinal sections were obtained and studied with a stereomicroscope for assessment of the microleakage according to degree of dye penetration (scale 0-3). Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test and with Mann-Whitney U-test.IN THIS STUDY THERE WAS NO LEAKAGE IN ENAMEL: all the cavities showed no dye penetration at the incisal margins (located in enamel). None of the DBS used eliminated microleakage in apical margins (located in dentin or cementum): three-step total-etch and single-step self-etch were more effective in reducing microleakage in dentin margins when compared with two-step total-etch. This in vitro study concluded that microleakage in Class V cavities restored with the composite resins tested is similar.     

Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of dentin bonding agents in reducing microleakage after three months in Class V restorations restored with Z100 resin composite. Materials tested were three types of resin-based dentin bonding agents: a multi-step (Scotchbond Multi-Purpose); a one-step (Scotchbond One-Step); a self-etching, self-priming (Clearfil Liner Bond) and a resin-modified glass ionomer (GC Fuji Bond LC). Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in cementum were prepared both on labial and lingual surfaces of extracted premolar teeth. Restorations (two per tooth) were distributed randomly into nine test groups (n = 10) consisting of the various DBAs applied with co-cure and pre-cure techniques, and no dentin bonding as a negative control group. Samples were stored in saline for three months, thermocycled, stained with silver nitrate, then sectioned through the middle of the preparation to facilitate the removal of the composite resin restoration. For groups treated with the pre-cure technique, the differences between the enamel leakage values of SBMP-control, CFLB-control and SB1S-control subgroups were significant (p < 0.05). For enamel leakage values of groups treated with the co-cure technique, the differences between the SBMP-control, SB1S-control, CFLB-control and Fuji LC-control subgroups were significant (p < 0.05). For cementum leakage values of groups treated with pre-cure technique, the difference between the CFLB-control and the Fuji, SBMP and SB1S groups was significant (p < 0.05). No significant differences could be detected between the cementum leakage values of groups treated with the co-cure technique (p > 0.05). The differences between the values obtained with application of CFLB with the pre-cure and co-cure techniques at the cementum margins were found to be statistically significant (p = 0.02). No statistically significant differences could be detected between the pre-cure and co-cure values of the other test materials. Generally for every group, cementum microleakage values were greater than enamel microleakage values (p < 0.05). The use of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, Scotchbond One-Step and Fuji Bond LC with the co-cure technique to decrease the application time did not cause any significant increase in microleakage. Only pre-curing using Clearfil Liner Bond provided better microleakage properties than the other pre-cured adhesives.     

Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems

The purpose of this in vitro microleakage study was to evaluate four low-viscosity composite resin systems. Each resin system included the corresponding bonding agent for each respective flowable composite. A hybrid material was used as a control. A total of 75 noncarious, freshly extracted human teeth were prepared with a Class 5 occlusal preparation and a gingival preparation at the cementoenamel junction. The materials were inserted according to the manufacturers' recommendations using the single-component bonding agent for each system. Teeth were thermocycled 800 times between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C with 30-second dwell times. The teeth were then coated with nail polish 1 mm short of the restoration, placed in a basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours, and sectioned with a diamond wheel. Enamel and dentin/cementum margins were analyzed for microleakage on a scale of 0 (no leakage) to 3 (axial wall). Results were evaluated with the Fisher's exact test. The results of the study indicate that there was no leakage at the enamel margin of any restorations. No statistically significant differences in microleakage were found in dentin/cementum margins among the samples in the experimental group or between the experimental group and control group. The results indicate flowable composites demonstrate resistance to microleakage in both enamel and cementum/dentin margins similar to TPH hybrid composite.     

Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites

This in vitro study evaluated gingival wall microleakage in packable and microhybrid conventional composite restorations with and without a flowable composite liner. Each group was evaluated with gingival margins situated in both enamel and cementum/dentin. Two hundred and forty Class II cavities were prepared in extracted third molars, half with gingival margins in enamel and half with margins in dentin/cementum. In groups of 30, restoration was undertaken with packable alone (3M Filtek P60), conventional alone (3M Z250), packable plus flowable liner (3M Filtek Flow) and conventional plus flowable liner. All used 37% phosphoric acid etch and Scotchbond 1 (3M) as the bonding system. After restoration, the teeth were thermocycled (between 5 degrees C, 37 degrees C and 60 degrees C) 1,500 times, soaked in 0.1% methylene blue, sectioned and microleakage from the gingival margin scored. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. There was no significant difference between systems in terms of leakage scores when gingival margins were situated in enamel (p=0.70). All restorations with margins in cementum/dentin leaked significantly more than those with margins in enamel (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between leakage scores of 3M Z250 and Filtek P60 with cementum/dentin gingival margins (p=0.68). Use of a flowable composite liner (3M Filtek Flow) against cementum/dentin was associated with increased microleakage (p<0.001). In this study, leakage scores suggest that gingival margins should be placed in enamel. The conventional and packable resin composites tested were not associated with differences in microleakage. Leakage data do not support the use of flowable resin composite linings in Class II resin composite restorations.     

Cuspal deformation and fracture resistance of teeth with dentin adhesives and composites

This study investigated the effect of polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite (Herculite) on the dimensions and fracture strength of human maxillary premolars with a phosphonate-ester DBA (Bondlite) and a second DBA comprised of 4-META with MMA/TBB (Superbond). The individual role of etched enamel and nonetched dentin bonding was also studied with high-copper amalgam used as a control. Two sizes of preparation isthmus were designated for evaluation of the effect of the polymerization contraction on weakened teeth. The following conclusions were drawn. 1. Narrow intracoronal tooth preparations were significantly stronger than wider, expansive preparations. There was no difference among the narrow isthmus preparations restored with amalgam or acid etching and composite. 2. There was a significant expansion in tooth dimension when MOD cavities were restored with amalgam. 3. Teeth with narrow isthmus preparations using composite bonded with Bondlite adhesive to etched enamel demonstrated a significant contraction compared with Superbond DBA. 4. Composite restorations using Superbond DBA in wide MOD cavities significantly improved the fracture strength of maxillary premolars. 5. Superbond DBA with composite restorations benefited the tooth in dimensional change and fracture strength. 6. There was a positive correlation between the fracture strength and tooth dimension.     

Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro

This in vitro study evaluated the microleakage at enamel (occlusal) and dentin (gingival) margins of MOD resin composite restorations made with different incremental insertion techniques. MOD cavities were prepared on 60 extracted human molars with the proximal margins placed 1 mm below the cemento-enamel junction. All teeth were acid-etched and treated with One-Step adhesive, then restored with a hybrid resin composite (Renew) with and without a flowable composite (AEliteflo) or a self-curing composite (Bisfil 2B) as the first increment in the proximal boxes. The time of placement of the second increment in relation to curing of the first increment was also varied. After polishing, the teeth were soaked in 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24 hours, sectioned and evaluated for dye penetration. None of the restorative techniques prevented microleakage at the enamel and dentin margins. However, microleakage at dentin margins were significantly reduced by the use of a flowable composite as the first increment in the proximal boxes. Time of placement in relation to curing had no influence on microleakage. Microleakage was lower at enamel margins than at dentin margins; however, besides microleakage at the enamel-restoration interface, 37 of the 60 restored teeth (62%) displayed at least one white line in enamel adjacent to the composite restoration.     

Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement

The purpose of this study was to compare the fracture resistance of teeth restored with bonded composite resin to teeth restored with glass ionomer cement. Extracted maxillary premolars prepared with MOD slots were restored with either a light-cured composite resin (P-30) bonded (with Scotchbond) to enamel and dentin or with glass ionomer cement (Ketac Fil) following manufacturers' directions. One group, left unrestored, served as the control. All of the teeth were loaded occlusally by a universal testing machine until fracture. The results suggest that teeth restored with bonded composite resin are significantly more resistant to fracture than teeth restored with glass ionomer cement (P=0.05). cohesive failures occurred frequently within the bulk of the glass ionomer cement. Failures with the bonded composites usually occurred within the bonding agent.     

Role of additional retention on marginal adaptation and sealing of large resin composite Class II restorations

PURPOSE: To compare marginal leakage and gap formation in large resin composite Class II cavities with their gingival margins in cementum, using three different additional retentions in the proximal box. METHODS: Standardized large Class II MOD cavities with gingival margins in cementum were prepared in 40 recently extracted molars and divided into four groups according to their retention in the proximal box: (G1) no retention; (G2) vertical grooves in the buccal and lingual walls; (G3) "pot holes" in the gingival wall and (G4) horizontal grooves in the gingival wall. All groups were restored with the incremental technique using the same resin composite (QuiXfil, Dentsply) and a bonding agent (Prime Bond NT, Dentsply). After polishing, all of the restored teeth were immersed in dye solution and submitted to simultaneous cyclic loading. Impressions of the gingival margins were made before and after loading, and epoxy resin replicas were evaluated for gap formation using a scanning electron microscope. The microleakage and gap extension data were evaluated by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Gap extension before and after mechanical loading was compared by Student's t-test. A correlation analysis was made between the gap extension and microleakage (Pearson's correlation test). RESULTS: All groups with additional retention (G2 = 0.565, G3 = 0.346 and G4 = 0.078) showed fewer gap formations than the control group (G1 = 2.076). Similar results were found for microleakage tests. All groups presented an increase in gap extension after loading, with the exception of the group with gingival retention grooves (G4). G4 showed the best results in relation to both parameters. There was a low correlation between gap extension and microleakage.     

Microleakage of Composite Restorations Bonded with Three New Dentin Bonding Agents

ABSTRACT: This report evaluates the impact of two dentin bonding techniques on microleakage of Class V restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding systems. Forty-eight extracted human premolar and molar teeth were randomly assigned to four groups for bonding with EBS Bonding System (ESPE, Seefeld, Germany); Syntac Single-Component (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein); Scotchbond 1 (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota); and a control, Prime and Bond 2.1 (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). Cavities were cut in both the buccal and lingual surfaces. The coronal half of each preparation was in enamel, and the gingival half was in cementum or dentin. The cavities were restored with composite after the application of dentin bonding agents, using two different drying techniques for each material. The teeth were stored in distilled water for 6 days at 37°C and then thermocycled. The restorations were examined microscopically for leakage, using Procion brilliant red as a marker. All groups showed microleakage at both the enamel and dentin margins. At the gingival margin, there was no significant difference between any of the experimental materials and the control for either wet bonding (Kruskal-Wallis: p .8920) or dry bonding (Kruskal-Wallis: p .9973); or between the two techniques for each material (Mann-Whitney U in all cases p > .05). Scanning electron microscopic examination confirmed that the zones of microleakage, as indicated by dye penetration, were principally resin-cohesive failures within the collagen-rich hybrid layer. Three water-based bonding agents were unable to prevent microleakage at either the enamel or dentin margins of Class V cavities regardless of which bonding technique was employed. All systems behaved equally.     

The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow) versus an injectable glass ionomer (Fuji II LC) on microleakage at the cavosurface margin of the proximal box of Class II restorations in permanent teeth in-vitro. Thirty caries and restoration-free human bicuspids were prepared with mesial and distal slot preparations and were filled either with a bonding agent (Optibond) plus a flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow), Group I; bonding agent (Optibond) plus a flowable glass ionomer (Fuji II LC), Group II; or a flowable glass ionomer (Fuji II LC) with no bonding agent, Group III. All specimens were then immersed in a 2% solution of basic fuschin dye for 24 hours to allow for dye penetration into possible existing gaps. These teeth were then carefully sectioned mesially/distally into two pieces using an Isomet saw. The teeth were then studied under a binocular microscope to measure depths of dye penetrations as an indication of marginal microleakage at the gingival cavosurface margin and scored as follows: 0 = no dye penetration, 1 = dye penetration into enamel only, 2 = dye penetration into enamel and dentin, 3 = dye penetration into the pulp. The specimens were also evaluated using a SEM. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences between Groups I (Tetric Flow) and (Fuji II LC plus bonding agent), II in favor of Group I; between Groups I and (Fuji II LC with no bonding agent), III in favor of Group I; as well as Groups II and III in favor of Group II (Fuji II LC plus bonding agent). Group I (bonding agent plus flowable composite resin) showed significantly less microleakage. Group II (bonding agent plus flowable glass ionomer) demonstrated a bond that existed between the bonding agent and the glass ionomer but microleakage within microgaps of the glass ionomer itself Group III (flowable glass ionomer plus no bonding agent) demonstrated significant microleakage between the glass ionomer and tooth structure, microgaps within the glass ionomer, and lack of retention of the restoration. It appears that the use of a flowable composite resin (Tetric Flow) plus a bonding agent (Optibond) in the proximal box of a Class II restoration in permanent teeth will significantly reduce the microleakage at the cavosurface margin when compared with an injectable glass ionomer (Fuji II LC) with or without a bonding agent (Optibond).     

Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents.

This report evaluates the impact of two dentin bonding techniques on microleakage of Class V restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding systems. Forty-eight extracted human premolar and molar teeth were randomly assigned to four groups for bonding with EBS Bonding System (ESPE, Seefeld, Germany); Syntac Single-Component (Ivoclar-Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein); Scotchbond 1 (3M Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota); and a control, Prime and Bond 2.1 (Dentsply, DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). Cavities were cut in both the buccal and lingual surfaces. The coronal half of each preparation was in enamel, and the gingival half was in cementum or dentin. The cavities were restored with composite after the application of dentin bonding agents, using two different drying techniques for each material. The teeth were stored in distilled water for 6 days at 37 degrees C and then thermocycled. The restorations were examined microscopically for leakage, using Procion brilliant red as a marker. All groups showed microleakage at both the enamel and dentin margins. At the gingival margin, there was no significant difference between any of the experimental materials and the control for either wet bonding (Kruskal-Wallis: p = .8920) or dry bonding (Kruskal-Wallis: p .9973); or between the two techniques for each material (Mann-Whitney U in all cases p > .05). Scanning electron microscopic examination confirmed that the zones of microleakage, as indicated by dye penetration, were principally resincohesive failures within the collagen-rich hybrid layer. Three water-based bonding agents were unable to prevent microleakage at either the enamel or dentin margins of Class V cavities regardless of which bonding technique was employed. All systems behaved equally.     

The role of cavity preparation and conditioning in the leakage of restorations

PURPOSE: Restoration microleakage is thought to be determined by the method and location of cavity preparation, enamel etching, and dentin conditioning, as well as the restorative material. This study compared the microleakage of composite restorations placed in preparations cut with carbide and diamond burs and those treated with different bonding/conditioning agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class V preparations (3 x 2 x 2 mm) were cut wholly in enamel or in enamel and cementum in 100 human premolars. Twenty teeth were prepared with carbide burs and the preparations etched and conditioned with Prime&Bond NT but not restored. A second set of 20 teeth had enamel-only preparations cut with carbides (n = 10) or diamonds (n = 10), and the preparations etched, conditioned (Prime&Bond NT) and restored with Prisma TPH. The other 60 teeth were divided into 3 groups of 20 teeth each with enamel-only (n = 10) or enamel/cementum preparations (n = 10). The 3 groups of teeth were conditioned with Optibond Solo, Clearfil SE Bond or Prompt-L-Pop prior to restoration with Prisma TPH. Two mm of root was resected from all teeth, pulpal tissue removed, and insulated copper wires inserted via the root canals to contact with the pulp chamber roof before the tooth-wire interfaces and root surfaces were sealed. The teeth were immersed in 0.9% NaCl and leakage assessed over 30 d by iR drop across a resistor in series with a DC source and stainless-steel counter electrode. RESULTS: Differences (p < 0.05) in leakage were found for enamel preparations cut with carbides and diamonds, and the relationship of leakage vs time was linear. Enamel/cementum preparations showed greater leakage, and the relationship of leakage vs time was sigmoidal. Conditioned-only preparations showed the same leakage as those conditioned and restored, while preparation leakage varied with the conditioning agent. CONCLUSION: Cavity preparation location, method of cutting, and the conditioning agent markedly affect leakage behavior.     

Technical note: fluoride pre-treatment effects on microleakage of a resin bonding agent

This pilot study reports the effect of fluoride pre-treatment of dentin and enamel on microleakage of a resin bonding agent. Pairs of circular class V cavities involving 50% enamel and 50% cementum were cut in 12 extracted third molars. Each tooth contained a control and a treatment cavity (matched-pair design). A stannous fluoride solution (0.717% SnF2, Gel-Kam, Scherer Laboratories, Dallas, TX) was applied to the entire treatment preparation of each tooth. A dentin resin bonding system (Scotchbond 2 with Scotchprep, a dentin primer, 3M Dental Products Div., St. Paul, MN) was applied per manufacturer's instructions. Silux resin (3M) was placed over the resin bonding agent, light-cured, and finished. The teeth were subjected to 500 temperature cycles between 5 and 55 degrees C. A silver nitrate staining technique was used for evaluation of microleakage. The mean leakage for the control was 2235 +/- 1146 microns, and 2105 +/- 1052 microns for the fluoride treatment sites. It is concluded, from this pilot study with small sample size, that pre-treatment with fluoride of dentin and enamel prior to the placement of a resin bonding agent produced no significant change in microleakage (Student's t test for paired samples, p = 0.6492).     

Microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays

The purpose of this study was to examine the microleakage and cusp fracture resistance of heat-treated composite resin inlays. One hundred and twenty extracted human bicuspid teeth were prepared with MOD Class II preparations and divided into 12 experimental groups. Ten extracted human teeth were kept sound as positive controls and 10 of the prepared teeth were left unrestored as negative controls for the cusp fracture resistance experiment. The remaining prepared teeth were grouped and restored with the following restorations: bulk or incremental placement, light-cured inlays, heat-treated inlays "cemented" with enamel bonding agent, enamel bonding agent/glass ionomer "sandwich", or a dentinal bonding agent. Heat-treated inlays showed significantly (P less than 0.05) less microleakage than all other groups. The cusp fracture resistance of the heat-treated inlays was in the same magnitude as that of the traditionally placed composite resin restoration. All restorations were significantly (P less than 0.05) lower in cusp fracture resistance than sound non-carious teeth.     

3种复合树脂充填Ⅴ类洞的微渗漏比较研究

目的:比较义获嘉N Ceram纳米瓷化树脂、N Flow流动树脂及Bulk Fill 三次方大块充填树脂充填上颌前磨牙Ⅴ类洞后树脂充填体边缘的微渗漏情况,评估3种不同复合树脂的抗微渗漏性能,寻找较好的充填V类洞的复合树脂材料.方法:选取牙体完整、健康的人离体前磨牙66颗,随机分为3组(n=22).所有样本牙在颊侧颈部制备标准V类箱状洞型(长4 mm、宽3 mm、深2 mm).3组试验牙经选择性釉质酸蚀自黏结后,分别使用N Ceram纳米瓷化树脂(A组)、N Flow流动树脂(B组)及Bulk Fill三次方大块充填树脂(C组)进行充填.充填完成后,3组试验牙均行弱光启动固化,打磨抛光.将3组样本进行1500个周期的冷热循环,2％亚甲基蓝浸泡染色7d,然后沿牙体颊舌向切片.每组随机选取2颗样本牙,在扫描电镜下观察牙体-充填体交界面的密合程度;其余60颗样本牙在体视显微镜下(×40)观察剖面充填体的微渗漏情况.采用Spot Advanced软件测量微渗漏深度,并根据0～3分分别给(牙合)、龈壁微渗漏程度评分.采用SPSS17.0软件包对各组的微渗漏深度分别进行Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验和Mann-Whitney检验.结果:义获嘉Bulk Fill组树脂在3组中龈壁的微渗漏最小,且与另外2组相比有显著差异,N Ceran纳米树脂组与N Flow流动树脂组龈壁的微渗漏均较高(P＜0.05);3组复合树脂材料(牙合)壁的微渗漏无显著差异(P＞0.05);3组树脂(牙合)壁的微渗漏值均比龈壁小且差异显著(P＜0.05).结论:3组树脂在(牙合)壁的微渗漏值无显著差异.义获嘉Bulk Fill组树脂充填V类洞时.在3组中龈壁的微渗漏最小,且与另外2种树脂之间有显著差异.     

Fluoride uptake by enamel and dentin from bonding agents and composite resins: a comparative study

The present study was performed to compare the amount of in vitro fluoride uptake by enamel and dentin from fluoridated bonding agent with non-fluoridated composite (Group I), non-fluoridated bonding agent with fluoridated composite (Group II) and fluoridated bonding agent with fluoridated composite resin (Group III). Sixty extracted premolars were selected and divided into three groups of 20 teeth each. Restorative materials were applied according to manufacturer's instructions into standard windows created in the teeth, cured and placed in de-ionised water for three months. The fluoride content of successive acid etch biopsy was determined by specific ion-electrode analysis. Although significant amount of fluoride uptake occurred in all the test groups, fluoride uptake was found to be highly significant in dentin when compared to enamel in Group, I, II and III (P<0.001). The fluoride uptake was greater by both enamel and dentin in Group III ie fluoridated bonding agent with fluoridated composite resin.     

Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth

The aim of this in vitro study was performed to evaluate the effect of dentin bonding agents and glass ionomer cement beneath composite restorations and its resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. Fifty sound extracted maxillary teeth were selected; ten of them for controls and the remainder were modified with root canal treatment and a mesial occlusal distal (MOD) cavity preparation. The modified teeth were then divided into five groups: 1. Sound teeth 2. Prepared without restorations for control 3. Prepared and restored with Vitrebond (3M, USA), Singlebond (3M, USA), and Z100 (3M, USA) resin composite 4. Prepared and restored with Concise enamel bonding agent (3M, USA) and Z100 resin composite 5. Prepared and restored using Singlebond and Z100 composite resin The modified specimens were subjected to compressive load by an Instron machine until fracture occurred. Group 1 showed the highest resistance to compressive force followed by Groups 5, 3, 4, and 2, respectively. Statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a t-test indicated significant difference between all groups. Use of a dentin bonding agent and composite resin increased the resistance of endodontically treated teeth to fracture.