Effects of medially wedged insoles on the biomechanics of the lower limbs of runners with excessive foot pronation and foot varus alignment

BackgroundExcessive foot pronation during running in individuals with foot varus alignment may be reduced by medially wedged insoles.Research questionThis study investigated the effects of a medially wedged insole at the forefoot and at the rearfoot on the lower limbs angles and internal moments of runners with excessive foot pronation and foot varus alignment.MethodsKinematic and kinetic data of 19 runners (11 females and 8 males) were collected while they ran wearing flat (control condition) and medially wedged insoles (insole condition). Both insoles had arch support. We used principal component analysis for data reduction and dependent t-test to compare differences between conditions.ResultsThe insole condition reduced ankle eversion (p = 0.003; effect size = 0.63); reduced knee range of motion in the transverse plane (p = 0.012; effect size = 0.55); increased knee range of motion in the frontal plane in early stance and had earlier knee adduction peak (p = 0.018; effect size = 0.52); reduced hip range of motion in the transverse plane (p = 0.031; effect size = 0.48); reduced hip adduction (p = 0.024; effect size = 0.50); reduced ankle inversion moment (p = 0.012; effect size = 0.55); and increased the difference between the knee internal rotation moment in early stance and midstance (p = 0.012; effect size = 0.55).SignificanceInsoles with 7˚ medial wedges at the forefoot and rearfoot are able to modify motion and moments patterns that are related to lower limb injuries in runners with increased foot pronation and foot varus alignment with some non-desired effects on the knee motion in the frontal plane.     

Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings

PURPOSE: To determine gender differences in lower-extremity joint kinematics and kinetics between age- and skill-matched recreational athletes. METHODS: Inverse dynamic solutions estimated the lower-extremity flexion-extension and varus-valgus kinematics and kinetics for 15 females and 15 males performing a 60-cm drop landing. A mixed model, repeated measures analysis of variance (gender (*) joint) was performed on select kinematic and kinetic variables. RESULTS: Peak hip and knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion angles were greater in females in the sagittal plane (group effect, P < 0.02). Females exhibited greater frontal plane motion (group (*) joint, P = 0.02). Differences were attributed to greater peak knee valgus and peak ankle pronation angles (post hoc tests, P = 0.00). Females exhibited a greater range of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane (group main effect, P = 0.02) and the frontal plane (group (*) joint, P = 0.01). Differences were attributed to the greater knee varus-valgus ROM, ankle dorsiflexion, and pronation ROM (post hoc tests). Ground reaction forces were different between groups (group (*) direction, P = 0.05). Females exhibited greater peak vertical and posterior (A/P) force than males (post hoc tests). Females exhibited different knee moment profiles (Group main effect, P = 0.01). These differences were attributed to a reduced varus moment in females (post hoc tests). CONCLUSION: The majority of the differences in kinematic and kinetic variables between male and female recreational athletes during landing were observed in the frontal plane not in the sagittal plane. Specifically, females generated a smaller internal knee varus moment at the time of peak valgus knee angulation.     

The influence of external knee moments on the outcome of total meniscectomy. A comparison of radiological and 3-D gait analysis measurements

Twenty one individuals who had undergone unilateral total meniscectomy, and had no significant antero-posterior (AP) laxity underwent three dimensional (3-D) gait analysis, bilateral radiological assessment of varus/valgus alignment and tibio-femoral osteoarthritis (TFOA). Average foot progression angle during the stance phase of gait was not related to knee adduction moment. The findings support the previously noted correlation between varus/valgus alignment and TFOA. The dynamic gait parameter of the adduction moment in early stance did not correlate with either hip–knee–ankle angle or TFOA, thus the expected influence of external moments on outcome after meniscectomy was not found. Thus the correlation between varus/valgus alignment and TFOA can not be explained by a simple loading algorithm.     

Toe-out angle changes after total knee arthroplasty in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis

Purpose

Toeing-out is a commonly proposed kinematic variable that has been suggested to reduce external knee adduction moment. Analyses of the toe-out angle after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are useful for obtaining a proper understanding of the abnormal gait caused by varus knee osteoarthritis (OA), as well as performing rehabilitation after arthroplasty. Changes in the toe-out angle after arthroplasty have not yet been defined or analysed.

Methods

The study population consisted of 32 knees in 32 patients with varus knee OA who underwent TKA. The femorotibial angle was evaluated on standing anteroposterior radiographs before and after arthroplasty. The subjects underwent three-dimensional motion capture analyses to measure gait parameters (walking speed, cadence, stride length, step length, step width and the relative length of the single-limb support (SLS) percentage of one gait cycle) and the maximal hip adduction angle in the stance phase, the trunk lean angle in the coronal plane and the toe-out angle before and 4 weeks after arthroplasty.

Results

The femorotibial angle on the side of arthroplasty improved after surgery. Among the measured gait parameters, only the SLS percentage increased significantly. The hip adduction angle and toe-out angle on the side of arthroplasty increased significantly after surgery.

Conclusions

The knee alignment and hip adduction angle in the coronal plane and SLS phase were normalized after arthroplasty. The increase in the toe-out angle after arthroplasty may be attributable to the restoration of a normal knee alignment. These findings contribute to obtaining a proper understanding of the abnormal gait caused by varus knee OA and are useful for orthopaedic surgeons and rehabilitation therapists when treating patients after arthroplasty.

Level of evidence

Prospective study, Level II.     

Quantitative evaluation of gait features after total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with age and sex-matched controls

BackgroundGait function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is suboptimal. However, quantified analysis with comparing a control group is lacking.Research questionThe aims of this study were 1) to compare the gait before and after TKA and 2) to compare postoperative gait to that of an age-sex matched control group.MethodsThis study consisted of 46 female and 38 male patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis who underwent bilateral TKA, and 84 age- and sex-matched controls without knee pain and osteoarthritis. Seven gait parameters, including lower extremity alignment, knee adduction moment (KAM), knee flexion angle, external knee flexion moment, hip adduction angle, external hip adduction moment, and the varus-valgus arc during the stance phase, were collected using a commercial opto-electric gait analysis system. Principal component analysis was used for data processing and the standardized mean differences (SMDs) of the principal component scores were compared.ResultsThe most significant gait change after TKA was the alignment (SMD 1.62, p < 0.001). The average stance phase alignment changed from varus 7.3° to valgus 0.5°. The second significant change was a decrease of the KAM (SMD 1.08, p < 0.001). These two features were closely correlated (r = 0.644, p < 0.001). The gait feature that differed most from the controls was the varus-valgus arc during the stance phase (SMD 1.68, p < 0.001), which was constrained by 31% after TKA (p < 0.001) and was only 37% compared to the controls (p < 0.001).SignificanceImprovement in gait after TKA was obtained through alignment correction. However, TKA significantly constrained coronal knee motion. TKA improved gait suboptimally; the gait was significantly different from that of controls.     

Hip external rotation stiffness and midfoot passive mechanical resistance are associated with lower limb movement in the frontal and transverse planes during gait

BackgroundHip external rotation stiffness, midfoot passive mechanical resistance and foot alignment may influence on ankle, knee and hip movement in the frontal and transverse planes during gait.Research questionAre hip stiffness, midfoot mechanical resistance and foot alignment associated with ankle, knee and hip kinematics during gait?MethodsHip stiffness, midfoot mechanical resistance, and foot alignment of thirty healthy participants (18 females and 12 males) with average age of 25.4 years were measured. In addition, lower limb kinematic data during the stance phase of gait were collected with the Qualisys System (Oqus 7+). Stepwise multiple linear regressions were performed to identify if hip stiffness, midfoot torque, midfoot stiffness and foot alignment were associated with hip and knee movement in the transverse plane and ankle movement in the frontal plane with α = 0.05.ResultsReduced midfoot torque was associated with higher hip range of motion (ROM) in the transverse plane (r² = 0.18), reduced hip stiffness was associated with higher peak hip internal rotation (r² = 0.16) and higher ROM in the frontal plane (r² = 0.14), reduced midfoot stiffness was associated with higher peak knee internal rotation (r² = 0.14) and increased midfoot torque and midfoot stiffness were associated with higher peak knee external rotation (r² = 0.36).SignificanceThese findings demonstrated that individuals with reduced hip and midfoot stiffness have higher hip and knee internal rotation and higher ankle eversion during the stance phase of gait. On the other hand, individuals with increased midfoot torque and stiffness have higher knee external rotation. These relationships can be explained by the coupling between ankle movements in the frontal plane and knee and hip movements in the transverse plane. Finally, this study suggests that midfoot passive mechanical resistance and hip stiffness should be assessed in individuals presenting altered ankle, knee and hip movement during gait.     

Association between ankle angle at initial contact and biomechanical ACL injury risk factors in male during self-selected single-leg landing

BackgroundIncreasing the ankle plantar-flexion angle at initial contact (IC) during landing reduces the impact features associated with landing, such as the vertical ground reaction force and loading rate, potentially affecting the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, the relationships between the ankle plantar-flexion angle at IC and the previously identified biomechanical factors related to noncontact ACL injury have not been studied.Research questionThus, the purpose of this study was to determine whether significant relationships exist between the ankle plantar-flexion angle at IC and the biomechanical factors related to noncontact ACL injury.MethodsThe peak anterior tibial shear force, peak external knee valgus moment, peak knee valgus angle, and combined peak external knee valgus plus tibial internal rotation moments were measured in 26 individuals while performing self-selected, single-leg landing. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to assess the relationships between the ankle plantar-flexion angle at IC and the biomechanical factors mentioned above.ResultsThe greater ankle plantar-flexion angle at IC was related to smaller the peak knee valgus moment (r = −0.5, p = 0.009) and the combined peak knee valgus plus internal rotation moments (r = −0.58, p = 0.001).SignificanceThese results suggest that large ankle plantar-flexion angle at IC might be associated with lesser loading of the knee frontal plane and altering the self-selective ankle angle may result in biomechanical changes associated with ACL injury risk.     

Is valgus unloader bracing effective in normally aligned individuals: implications for post-surgical protocols following cartilage restoration procedures

Purpose

Utilizing valgus unloader braces to reduce medial compartment loading in patients undergoing cartilage restoration procedures may be an alternative to non-weightbearing post-operative protocols in these patients. It was hypothesized that valgus unloader braces will reduce knee adduction moment during the stance phase in healthy subjects with normal knee alignment.

Methods

Gait analysis was performed on twelve adult subjects with normal knee alignment and no history of knee pathology. Subjects were fitted with an off-the-shelf adjustable valgus unloader brace and tested under five conditions: one with no brace and four with increasing valgus force applied by the brace. Frontal and sagittal plane knee angles and external moments were calculated during stance via inverse dynamics. Analyses of variance were used to assess the effect of the brace conditions on frontal and sagittal plane joint angles and moments.

Results

With increasing tension in the brace, peak frontal plane knee angle during stance shifted from 1.6° ± 4.2° varus without the brace to 4.1° ± 3.6° valgus with maximum brace tension (P = 0.02 compared with the no brace condition). Peak knee adduction moment and knee adduction impulse decreased with increasing brace tension (main effect of brace, P < 0.001). Gait velocity and sagittal plane knee biomechanics were minimally affected.

Conclusion

The use of these braces following a cartilage restoration procedure may provide adequate protection of the repair site without limiting the patient’s mobility.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic prospective comparative study, Level II.     

Threshold of equinus which alters biomechanical gait parameters in children

The main aim of this study was to define the threshold angle of equinus beyond which significant changes in 3D lower limb kinematics and kinetics occur in typically developing children and to describe these changes.A customized orthosis was fitted on the right ankle of 10 typically developing children and was adjusted to +10° ankle dorsiflexion, 0°, ?10°, ?20° plantarflexion and maximum plantarflexion. Gait was analyzed using an optoelectronic system. A gait velocity of 1 m/s was imposed.Most of the kinematic and kinetic changes were significantly altered from the ?10° condition. In the sagittal plane, the results showed increased knee flexion at initial contact, increased knee flexion or hyperextension in stance, increased hip flexion at initial contact and increased anterior pelvic tilt. Other changes included increased knee varus, reduced hip adduction and more internal foot progression. The ankle plantarflexion moment was bi-phasic during stance, peak ankle power generation was reduced, peak knee extension moment was decreased and hip extension moments increased. On the contralateral side, there was a significant increase in ankle plantarflexion at initial contact and a significant decrease in knee flexion during swing phaseat maximum plantarflexion.Although slight modifications occurred for smaller degrees of equinus, the results suggest that significant kinematic and kinetic changes occurred during gait in both limbs from 10° of plantarflexion. The results of this study also provide some indications regarding the primary causes of gait deviations and secondary compensatory strategiesin children with a clinical dorsiflexion limitation.     

Is there a dose-response of medial wedge insoles on lower limb biomechanics in people with pronated feet during walking and running?

BackgroundAlthough the effects of medial wedge insoles on lower limb biomechanics have been investigated, information about the effects of different magnitudes of medial posting is still lacking.Research questionWhat are the dose-response effects of medial wedge insoles with postings varying between 0 °, 3 °, 6 °, and 9 ° of inclination on the lower limb biomechanics during walking and running in individuals with pronated feet?MethodsSixteen participants with an FPI ≥ 6 were recruited. Four arch-supported insole conditions with varying degrees of medial heel wedge were tested (0°, 3°, 6°, and 9°). A 3D motion analysis system with force plates was used to obtain the kinetics and kinematics of walking and running at self-selected speeds. To compare the ankle, knee, and hip angles and moments among conditions, a time series analysis was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM).ResultsA reduction in ankle eversion angle was observed during walking for all insoles. For running, the 6° and 9° insoles decreased the ankle eversion angle during early stance and increased this angle during the propulsive phase. A decrease in ankle eversion moment was observed in walking and running for 6° and 9° insoles. An increase in knee adduction moment occurred in walking and running for all insoles. For hip, the 6° and 9° insoles showed, during walking, a decrease in hip adduction angle and an increase in hip adduction and external rotation moments. For most variables, statistical differences were found for a greater period across the stance phase as the medial wedge increased, except for ankle eversion moment and hip external rotation moment during walking.SignificanceThe biomechanical effects over the time series for many of the parameters increased with the addition of insole inclination, showing a dose-response effect of medial wedge insoles on the lower limb biomechanics during walking and running in adults with excessive foot pronation.     

Frontal plane kinematics predict three-dimensional hip adduction during running

ObjectivesTo investigate if frontal plane kinematics are predictive of three dimensional (3D) hip adduction and hip internal rotation during running.Study designCross-sectional.SettingBiomechanics laboratory.ParticipantsThirty healthy male runners aged 18–45 years.Main outcome measuresTwo dimensional (2D) angles in the frontal plane (peak pelvic obliquity, peak hip adduction, peak femoral valgus, peak knee valgus and peak tibial valgus) and 3D hip adduction and hip internal rotation during stance phase of running were obtained.ResultsLinear regression modelling revealed that peak 2D pelvic obliquity (a drop towards the contralateral leg) and peak femoral valgus significantly predicted 88% of the variance in peak 3D hip adduction (p < 0.001). Frontal plane kinematics however, were not predictive of peak hip internal rotation in 3D (p > 0.05).ConclusionsFrontal plane kinematics, specifically contralateral pelvic drop and femoral valgus, predicted the vast majority of the variance in 3D hip adduction during the stance phase of running. This indicates that 2D video may have potential as a clinically feasible proxy for measurement of peak 3D hip adduction – a risk factor for patellofemoral pain.     

Alignment does not influence cartilage T2 in asymptomatic knee joints

Purpose

To investigate whether the static knee alignment affects articular cartilage ultrastructures when measured using T2 relaxation among asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

Both knee joints (n = 96) of 48 asymptomatic volunteers (26 females, 22 males; 25.4 ± 1.7 years; no history of major knee trauma or surgery) were evaluated clinically (Lysholm, Tegner) and by MRI (hip–knee–ankle angle, standard knee protocol, T2 mapping). Group (n = 4) division was as follows: neutral (<1° varus/valgus), mild varus (2°–4° varus), severe varus (>4° varus) and valgus (2°–4° valgus) deformity with n = 12 subjects/group; n = 24 knees/group. Regions of interest (ROI) for T2 assessment were placed within full-thickness cartilage across the whole joint surface and were divided respecting compartmental as well as functional joint anatomy.

Results

Leg alignment was 0.7° ± 0.5° varus among neutral, 3.0° ± 0.6° varus among mild varus, 5.0° ± 1.1° varus among severe varus and 2.5° ± 0.7° valgus among valgus group subjects and thus significantly different. No differences between the groups emerged from clinical measures. No morphological pathology was detected in any knee joint. Global T2 values (42.3 ± 2.3; 37.7–47.9 ms) of ROIs placed within every knee joint per subject were not different between alignment groups or between genders, respectively.

Conclusion

Static frontal plane leg malalignment does not affect cartilage ultrastructure among young, asymptomatic individuals as measured by T2 quantitative imaging.

Level of evidence

Cross-sectional study, Level II-III.     

Dynamic loading of the knee and hip joint and compensatory strategies in children and adolescents with varus malalignment

Three-dimensional gait analysis is a diagnostic tool that can be used to gain a better understanding of the relationship between joint loading and the onset or progression of articular cartilage degeneration in subjects with varus malalignment. The purpose of the present study was to investigate knee and hip joint angles and moments in children and adolescents with pathological varus alignment of the knee without signs of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Moreover, we wanted to know if compensatory mechanisms are present in this young patient group. Fourteen, otherwise healthy patients with varus malalignment of the knee and 15 healthy control subjects were analysed. Patients showed a reduced knee extension and a significantly lower maximum knee extension moment in terminal stance compared to controls. The maximum knee adduction moment in mid and terminal stance and the maximum hip abduction moment in loading response were significantly higher in the patient group. In the transverse plane, abnormally increased knee internal rotation and hip external rotation moments were present in patients with varus malalignment. These findings imply that varus malalignment is not an isolated problem in the frontal plane. In contrast to adult patients with established medial knee OA, the young patients assessed in the present study did not show typical compensatory mechanisms such as increased foot progression angle or reduced walking speed. This suggests that children and adolescents with varus malalignment of the knee probably do not need to alter their spatio-temporal gait parameters in order to decrease knee joint loading.     

Effects of varus knee alignment on gait biomechanics and lower limb muscle activity in boys: A cross sectional study

BackgroundThere is evidence that frontal plane lower limb malalignment (e.g., genu varus) is a risk factor for knee osteoarthritis development. However, only scarce information is available on gait biomechanics and muscle activity in boys with genu varus.Research questionTo examine the effects of knee varus alignment on lower limb kinematics, kinetics and muscular activity during walking at self-selected speed in boys with genu varus versus healthy age-matched controls.MethodsThirty-six boys were enrolled in this study and divided into a group of boys with genu varus (n = 18; age: 11.66 ± 1.64 years) and healthy controls (n = 18; age: 11.44 ± 1.78 years). Three-dimensional kinematics, ground reaction forces, loading rates, impulses and free moments of both limbs were recorded during five walking trials at self-selected speed. Surface electromyography was recorded for rectus femoris and vastus lateralis/medialis muscles.ResultsNo significant between-group differences were found for gait speed. Participants in the genu varus group versus controls showed larger peak knee flexion (p = 0.030; d = 0.77), peak knee adduction (p < 0.001; d = 1.63), and peak ankle eversion angles (p < 0.001; d = 2.06). Significantly higher peak ground reaction forces were found at heel contact (vertical [p = 0.002; d = 1.16] and posterior [p < 0.001; d = 1.63] components) and at push off (vertical [p = 0.010; d = 0.93] and anterior [p < 0.001; d = 1.34] components) for genu varus versus controls. Peak medial ground reaction force (p = 0.032; d = 0.76), vertical loading rate (p < 0.001; d = 1.52), anterior-posterior impulse (p = 0.011; d = 0.92), and peak negative free moment (p = 0.030; d = 0.77) were significantly higher in genu varus. Finally, time to reach peak forces was significantly shorter in genu varus boys compared with healthy controls (p < 0.01; d = 0.73–1.60). The genu varus group showed higher activities in vastus lateralis (p < 0.001; d = 1.82) and vastus medialis (p = 0.013; d = 0.90) during the loading phase of walking.SignificanceOur study revealed genu varus specific gait characteristics and muscle activities. Greater knee adduction angle in genu varus boys may increase the load on the medial compartment of the knee joint. The observed characteristics in lower limb biomechanics and muscle activity could play a role in the early development of knee osteoarthritis in genu varus boys.     

Hindfoot alignment at one year after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

It has previously been found that valgus hindfoot alignment (HFA) improves 3 weeks following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for varus knee osteoarthritis (OA). In the present study, HFA was evaluated prior to TKA, as well as 3 weeks and 1 year following TKA. Using these multiple evaluations, the chronological effects of TKA on HFA were investigated.

Methods

The study included 71 patients (73 legs) who underwent TKA for varus knee OA. Radiograph examinations of the entire limb and hindfoot were performed in the standing position prior to TKA, as well as 3 weeks and 1 year following TKA. The varus–valgus angle was used as an indicator of HFA in the coronal plane. Patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative varus–valgus angle: a hindfoot varus group (varus–valgus angle <76°) and a hindfoot valgus group (varus–valgus angle ≥76°). The changes in the varus–valgus angle were evaluated and compared in both groups.

Results

In the hindfoot valgus group, the mean ± standard deviation varus–valgus angle significantly declined from 80.5 ± 3.1° prior to TKA to 78.6 ± 3.7° 3 weeks following TKA and 77.1 ± 2.7° 1 year following TKA. However, in the hindfoot varus group, the mean varus–valgus angle prior to TKA (72.7 ± 2.6°) did not differ significantly from the mean varus–valgus angles 3 weeks (72.3 ± 3.3°) or 1 year (73.5 ± 3.0°) following TKA.

Conclusions

HFA improved chronologically in legs with hindfoot valgus as a result of the alignment compensation ability of the hindfoot following TKA. However, no improvement was noted in legs with hindfoot varus because the alignment compensation ability of the hindfoot had been lost. The patients with hindfoot varus should be attended for ankle pain in the outpatient clinic after TKA.

Level of evidence

III.

     

Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angle modification during gait in healthy subjects

BackgroundAchieving a neutral static Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (sHKA) measured on radiographs has been considered a factor of success for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, recent studies have shown that sHKA seems to have no effect on TKA survivorship. sHKA is not representative of the dynamic loading occurring during gait, unlike the dynamic HKA (dHKA).Research questionThe primary objective was to see if the sHKA is predictive of the dynamic HKA (dHKA). A secondary objective was to document to what degree the dHKA changes during gait.MethodsWe analysed 3D knee kinematics during gait of a cohort of 90 healthy individuals with the KneeKG™ system. dHKA was calculated and compared with sHKA. Knees were considered “Stable” if the dHKA remained in valgus or varus for greater than 95% of the corresponding phase, and “Changer” otherwise. Patient characteristics of the Stable and Changer knees were compared to find associated factors.ResultsAbsolute variation of dHKA during gait was 10.9 ± 5.3° for the whole cohort. The variation was less for the varus knees (10.3 ± 4.8°), than for the valgus knees (12.8 ± 6.1°, p = 0.008). We found low to moderate correlations (r = 0.266 to 0.553, p < 0.001) between sHKA and dHKA values for varus knees and no significant correlation for valgus knees. Twenty two percent (36/165) of the knees were considered Changers. The proportion of knees that were Changers was 15% of the varus versus 39% of the valgus (p < 0.001).SignificanceLower limb radiographic measures of coronal alignment have limited value for predicting dynamic measures of alignment during gait.     

The accuracy of intramedullary tibial guide of sagittal alignment of PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty

Experimental and clinical studies on the accuracy of the intramedullary alignment method have produced different results, and few have addressed accuracy in the sagittal plane. Reported deviations are not only attributable to the alignment method but also to radiological errors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the intramedullary alignment method in the sagittal plane using computed tomography (CT) and 3-dimensional imaging software. Thirty-one TKAs were performed using an intramedullary alignment method involving the insertion of a long 8-mm diameter rod into the medullary canal to the distal metaphysis of the tibia. All alignment instruments were set to achieve an ideal varus/valgus angle of 0° in the coronal plane and a tibial slope of 0° in the sagittal plane. The accuracy of the intramedullary alignment system was assessed by measuring the coronal tibial component angle and sagittal tibial slope angles, i.e., angles between the tibial anatomical axis and the tangent to the medial and lateral tibial plateau or the cut-surface. The mean coronal tibial component angle was 88.5° ± 1.2° and the mean tibial component slope in the sagittal plane was 1.6° ± 1.2° without anterior slope. Our intramedullary tibial alignment method, which involves passing an 8-mm diameter long rod through the tibial shaft isthmus, showed good accuracy (less than 3 degrees of variation and no anterior slope) in the sagittal plane in neutral or varus knees.     

Heel height affects lower extremity frontal plane joint moments during walking

Wearing high heels alters walking kinematics and kinetics and can create potentially adverse effects on the body. Our purpose was to determine how heel height affects frontal plane joint moments at the hip, knee, and ankle, with a specific focus on the knee moment due to its importance in joint loading and knee osteoarthritis. 15 women completed overground walking using three different heel heights (1, 5, and 9 cm) for fixed speed (1.3 ms(-1)) and preferred speed conditions while kinematic and force platform data were collected concurrently. For both fixed and preferred speeds, peak internal knee abduction moment increased systematically as heel height increased (fixed: 0.46, 0.48, 0.55 N m kg(-1); preferred: 0.47, 0.49, 0.53 N m kg(-1)). Heel height effects on net frontal plane moments of the hip and ankle were similar to those for the knee; peak joint moments increased as heel height increased. The higher peak internal knee abduction moment with increasing heel height suggests greater medial loading at the knee. Kinetic changes at the ankle with increasing heel height may also contribute to larger medial loads at the knee. Overall, wearing high heels, particularly those with higher heel heights, may put individuals at greater risk for joint degeneration and developing medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.     

Verification of validity of gait analysis systems during treadmill walking and running using human pose tracking algorithm

BackgroundThe human tracking algorithm called OpenPose can detect joint points and measure segment and joint angles. However, the validity of gait analysis using OpenPose has not been examined yet.Research questionWhat is the validity of OpenPose-based gait analysis?MethodsTwenty-four healthy young people participated in this study. The participants were assessed during walking and running. Pelvic segment angles, and hip, knee, and ankle joint angles during treadmill walking and running were measured using VICON. Simultaneously, images were captured using digital cameras from the right and back sides. After processing with OpenPose, the corresponding angles were measured from the estimated joint points. To validate these estimations, linear regression analysis was performed, and intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs (2, 1)] between the data obtained by OpenPose and VICON were calculated. Furthermore, the agreement between the data obtained by OpenPose and VICON was assessed by Bland–Altman analysis.ResultsFor most ranges of motion (ROM) in the sagittal plane, the hip, knee, and ankle joints had large coefficients of determination, without proportional biases. For most peak angles in the sagittal plane, the knee and ankle joints had large coefficients of determination without proportional biases, although the hip joint had nonsignificant coefficients of determination and proportional biases. In particular, for the hip flexion-extension ROM and peak knee flexion angle during running and the knee ROM during slow walking, the ICCs showed good to excellent agreement. However, for the parameters of the pelvis and hip joint in the frontal plane, there were nonsignificant coefficients of determination and poor ICCs with fixed and proportional biases.SignificanceThe lower limb ROM in the sagittal plane during gait can be measured by the OpenPose-based motion analysis system. The markerless systems have the advantage of being more economical and convenient than conventional methods.     

Radiographic measures of knee alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: effect of weightbearing status and associations with dynamic joint load

BACKGROUND: Radiographic measures of lower limb malalignment are used to indicate abnormal loading of the knee and to plan corrective procedures. HYPOTHESES: Weightbearing status during hip-to-ankle radiographs will significantly affect malalignment measures; malalignment in single-limb standing will be most highly correlated to the external knee adduction moment during gait, a proposed dynamic measure of functional knee joint load. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Mechanical axis angle was measured in 40 patients with varus gonarthrosis from hip-to-ankle radiographs taken with patients in single-limb standing, double-limb standing, and supine positions. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during walking and used to calculate the peak adduction moment about the knee. RESULTS: Repeated-measures analysis of variance and Scheffé post hoc tests indicated that mechanical axis angle measured on single-limb standing radiographs (-8.7 degrees +/- 4.0 degrees) was significantly greater than on double-limb standing radiographs (-7.1 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees), which was significantly greater than on supine radiographs (-5.5 degrees +/- 2.8 degrees). The peak knee adduction moment (2.8 +/- 0.8 percentage body weight x height) was only moderately correlated with mechanical axis angle on single-limb standing (r = -0.46), double-limb standing (r = -0.45), and supine (r = -0.43) radiographs. CONCLUSION: Patient position significantly affects frontal plane knee alignment. However, the peak knee adduction moment is only moderately correlated to mechanical axis angle, regardless of weightbearing status. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings are inconsistent with the hypothesis that mechanical axis angle measured in single-limb standing is more representative of dynamic joint load and further highlight the differences between static and dynamic measures. Results also underscore the importance of reporting patient position during radiographs and keeping positions consistent when evaluating patients over time.