Effects of negative pressure wound therapy on wound infection and healing in patients with open fracture wounds: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate the impact of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on wound infection and healing in patients with open fracture wounds. Computer searches were performed in EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the application of NPWT in open fracture wounds, with the search period covering the databases inception to September 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and conducted quality assessments. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Overall, 17 RCTs involving 1814 patients with open fracture wounds were included. The analysis revealed that compared with other treatment methods, NPWT significantly shortened the wound healing time (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −2.86, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: −3.51 to −2.20, p < 0.001) and fracture healing time (SMD = −3.14, 95% CI: −4.49 to −1.79, p < 0.001) in patients with open fracture wounds. It also significantly reduced the incidence of wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.23–0.56, p < 0.001) and complications (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20–0.40, p < 0.001). This study indicates that in the treatment of open fracture wounds, NPWT, compared with conventional treatment methods, can accelerate the healing of wounds and fractures, effectively control infections and reduce the occurrence of complications, demonstrating high safety.     

Negative pressure wound therapy vs. conventional management in open tibia fractures: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundSevere open tibia fractures are disastrous injuries associated with a high incidence of complications. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a novel treatment for open tibia fractures; however, its efficacy remains unclear. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis performed to evaluate the effect of NPWT on decreasing the infection rate, amputation rate, nonunion rate, and flap-related complications in open tibia fractures.MethodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched. Complications were evaluated in terms of the rates of infection, amputation, nonunion, and flap-related complications.ResultsTwelve studies were included. In the meta-analysis, NPWT showed significantly lower soft-tissue infection rate (odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.68, P < 0.0001), nonunion rate (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39–0.95, P = 0.03), flap necrosis rate (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21–0.63, P = 0.0003), and flap revision rate (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22–0.89, P = 0.02) than conventional wound management. However, no significant difference was found in osteomyelitis rate (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.09–3.28, P = 0.50) and amputation rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.36–2.22, P = 0.80) between the 2 groups.ConclusionLower rates of soft-tissue infection, nonunion, flap necrosis, and flap revision were observed in the NPWT group than in the conventional dressing group. However, additional high-quality studies are warranted to verify the efficacy of NPWT in the treatment of severe open tibia fractures. We could not make a definitive conclusion about the comparative efficacy of the 2 methods in terms of complications because of insufficient data.     

Clinical outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation vs standard negative pressure wound therapy for wounds: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with or without instillation has been extensively applied for patients with multiple wound types. Whether NPWT with instillation is superior to NPWT alone is not known. This study aims to compare the efficacy between negative pressure wound therapy with instillation (NPWTi) and standard negative pressure wound therapy for wounds. The authors searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials investigating clinical outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation vs standard negative pressure wound therapy for wounds. The registration number (protocol) on PROSPERO is CRD42022287178. Eight RCTs involved 564 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included finally. NPWTi showed a significant fewer surgeries and dressing changes (RR and 95% CI, −9.31 [−17.54, −1.08], P < 0.05), and smaller wound area after treatment (RR and 95% CI, −9.31 [−17.54, −1.08], P < 0.05) compared with NPWT. No significant difference was observed on healing rate, time to heal, length of stay, dehiscence, reinfection, reoperation and readmission between NPWTi and NPWT. The addition of instillation to NPWT could improve clinical outcomes regarding the number of surgeries and dressing changes, and wound area after treatment in patients with multiple wound types. However, because of the heterogeneity these conclusions still need to be further validated by more well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes.     

Impact of negative pressure wound treatment on incidence of surgical site infection in varied orthopedic surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a popular treatment to heal infected wounds. This meta-analysis aimed to determine if NPWT was more effective than conventional wound dressings for surgical site infections (SSI) in varied orthopaedic surgeries. Literature was retrieved from seven electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and CNKI). Randomised control trials (RCT) and retrospective cohort studies (RS) involving arthroplasty, fracture, and spinal surgery were extracted. SSI was our primary outcome, while total complications and length of hospital stay were secondary outcomes. We carried out the risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and Stata 17.0. Among the 798 studies retrieved, 18 of them met our inclusion criteria. We identified 13 RCTs and 5 RSs. The results of meta-analysis showed that the incidence of SSI in the NPWT group was significantly lower relative to the control group (OR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.77, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that the incidences of SSI involving arthroplasty, fracture, and spinal surgery in the NPWT group accounted for 46%, 69%, and 37% relative to the control group, respectively. The incidence of SSI in RS (OR = 0.27, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.56) was significantly lower than that in RCT (OR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90) (P = 0.02). Moreover, patients in the NPWT group had a lower total complication rate (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.76) and shorter hospital stays (SMD = −0.42, 95% CI −0.83 to −0.02), although high heterogeneity existed. NPWT may be an efficient alternative to help prevent the incidence of SSI and total complications as well as achieved shorten hospital stay in varied orthopaedic surgeries. The rational use of NPWT should be based on the presence of patients' clinical conditions and relevant risk factors.     

A systemic review and a meta-analysis on the influences of closed incisions in orthopaedic trauma surgery by negative pressure wound treatment compared with conventional dressings

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the influences of closed incisions in orthopaedic trauma surgery (OTS) by negative pressure wound treatment (NPWT) compared with conventional dressings. A systematic literature search up to March 2022 was done and 14 studies included 3935 subjects with OTS at the start of the study; 2023 of them used NPWT and 1912 were conventional dressings. They were reporting relationships between the influences of closed incisions in OTS by NPWT compared with conventional dressings. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the influences of closed incisions in OTS by NPWT compared with conventional dressings using the dichotomous methods with a random or fixed-effect model. NPWT had significantly lower deep surgical site infections (SSIs) (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87, P = .004), superficial SSIs (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.61, P < .001), and wound dehiscence (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.80, P = .009) compared with conventional dressings in subjects with closed incisions in OTS. NPWT showed a beneficial effect on deep SSIs, superficial SSIs, and wound dehiscence compared with conventional dressings in subjects with closed incisions in OTS. Further studies are required to validate these findings.     

Effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post-surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post-surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery. A systematic literature search up to April 2022 was performed and 1537 total number of groin vascular surgery incisions at the baseline of the studies; 729 of them were using the prophylactic negative pressure treatment, and 808 were using control. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of prophylactic negative pressure treatment for post-surgery groin wounds management in vascular surgery using the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The prophylactic negative pressure treatment subjects had a significantly lower surgical site wound infection (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16-0.42, P < .001) in subjects after vascular surgery compared with control. However, prophylactic negative pressure treatment did not show any significant difference in revision surgery (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.52-1.00, P = .05), readmission (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.32, P = .69), mortality in hospital (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.29-1.01, P = .05), and length of hospital stay (MD, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.91-0.44, P = .49) compared with control in subjects after vascular surgery. The prophylactic negative pressure treatment subjects had a significantly lower surgical site wound infection and no significant difference in revision surgery, readmission, mortality in hospital, and length of hospital stay compared with control in subjects after vascular surgery. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 2 out of 10 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.     

Surgical site wound infection,and other postoperative problems after coronary artery bypass grafting in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on surgical site wound infection, and other postoperative problems after coronary artery bypass grafting. A systematic literature search up to April 2022 was performed and 37 444 subjects with coronary artery bypass grafting at the baseline of the studies; 4320 of them were with the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 33 124 were without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on surgical site wound infection, and other postoperative problems after coronary artery bypass grafting using the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects had a significantly higher surgical site wound infection (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.60, P = 0.04), respiratory failure (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.55-2.18, P < 0.001), mortality (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.37-1.89, P < 0.001), pneumonia (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.97-2.68, P < 0.001), pleural effusion (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.12-2.83, P = 0.02), stroke (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.17-3.36, P = 0.01), and length of intensive care unit stay (MD, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.19-1.26, P = 0.008) after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with subjects without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects did not show any significant difference in length of hospital stay (MD, 0.83; 95% CI, −0.01 to 1.67, P = 0.05), and pneumothorax (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.98-2.59, P = 0.06) after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with subjects without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects had a significantly higher surgical site wound infection, respiratory failure, mortality, pneumonia, pleural effusion, stroke, and length of intensive care unit stay, and no significant difference in length of hospital stay, and pneumothorax after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with subjects without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 1 out of 11 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.     

Effect of body mass index on surgical site wound infection,mortality, and postoperative hospital stay in subjects undergoing possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of body mass index on surgical site wound infection, mortality, and postoperative hospital stay in subjects undergoing possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer. A systematic literature search up to March 2022 was performed and 2247 subjects with possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer at the baseline of the studies; 2889 of them were obese, and 9358 were non-obese. Odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of body mass index on surgical site wound infection, mortality, and postoperative hospital stay in subjects undergoing possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer using the dichotomous or contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The obese subjects had a significantly higher surgical site wound infection after colorectal surgery (OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.62-2.15, P < .001), and higher mortality (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.07-2.32, P = .02) in subjects with possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer compared with non-obese. However, obese did not show any significant difference in postoperative hospital stay (MD, 0.81; 95% CI, −0.030 to 1.92, P = .15) compared with non-obese in subjects with possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer. The obese subjects had a significantly higher surgical site wound infection after colorectal surgery, higher mortality, and no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay compared with non-obese in subjects with possibly curative surgery for colorectal cancer. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low number of studies in certain comparisons.     

Surgical site wound infection and wound pain after video-assisted thoracoscopy in patients with lung cancer: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively assess the effects of video-assisted thoracoscopy on surgical site wound infection and wound pain in patients with lung cancer. Studies on video-assisted thoracoscopy for lung cancer were collected from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Wanfang database, from inception to January 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Thirty-one articles with a total of 3608 patients were included, with 1809 in the video-assisted thoracoscopy group and 1799 in the control group. Compared with the control group, video-assisted thoracoscopy significantly reduced surgical site wound infection (odds ratio: 0.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14–0.33, P < .001) and surgical site wound pain at postoperative day 1 (standardised mean difference [SMD]: −0.90, 95% CI: −1.17 to −0.64, P < .001) and postoperative day 3 (SMD: −1.59, 95% CI: −2.25 to −0.92, P < .001). Thus, these results showed that video-assisted thoracoscopy may have beneficial outcomes by reducing surgical site wound infection and pain. However, owing to the large variation in sample sizes and some methodological shortcomings, further validation is needed in future studies with higher quality and larger sample sizes.     

The outcome of sutured wounds compared with tissue adhesive for paediatric wound closure: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis investigation was executed to measure the outcome of sutured wounds (SWs) compared with tissue adhesive (TA) for paediatric wound closure (PWC). A comprehensive literature inspection till February 2023 was applied and 2018 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 18 chosen investigations enclosed 1697 children with PWC in the chosen investigations' starting point, 977 of them were utilising SWs, and 906 were utilising TA. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compute the value of the effect of SWs compared with TA for PWC by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. SWs had significantly higher wound cosmetic (WC) scores (mean deviation [MD], 1.70; 95% CI, 0.57–2.84, P = .003), lower wound dehiscence (WD) (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.06–0.43, P < .001), and lower cost (MD, −10.22; 95% CI, −10.94 to −9.50, P < .001) compared with those with TA in PWC. No significant difference was found between children utilising SWs and TA in wound infection (WI) (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.15–1.30, P = .14) with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%) in PWC. SWs had significantly higher WC scores, lower WD, and lower cost, yet, no significant difference was found in WI compared with those with TA in PWC. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations and the low number of selected investigations for the meta-analysis.     

Wound healing rates and wound problems of conventional circumcision compared with ring circumcision: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis investigation was executed to measure the wound healing rates (WHRs) and wound problems (WPs) of conventional circumcision (CC) compared with ring circumcision (RC). A comprehensive literature investigation till March 2023 was applied and 2347 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 16 chosen investigations enclosed 25 838 individuals, with circumcision, were in the chosen investigations' starting point, 3252 of them were RC, and 2586 were CC. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compute the value of the WHRs and WPs of CC compared with RC by the dichotomous or continuous approaches and a fixed or random model. RC had a significantly lower wound infection rate (WIR) (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.91, P = .002) and wound bleeding rate (WBR) (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.12-0.42, P < .001) compared with those with CC. However, RC and CC had no significant difference in WHR (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, −0.73 to 5.09, P = .14), wound edema rate (WER) (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.92-1.33, P = .28), and wound dehiscence rate (WDR) (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.60-1.58, P = .93). RC had significantly lower WIR, and WBR, however, no significant difference in WHR, WER, and WDR compared with those with CC. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.     

In-hospital nursing care intervention increasing the effect of vacuum sealing drainage on wound healing: A meta-analysis

Vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) could effectively drain superficial wounds and deep tissues, which is beneficial for wound healing. More incentives in nursing care to improve the therapeutic effect of VSD on wound healing were further investigated. Different databases were retrieved for full-text publications about the comparison between intervention nursing care and regular nursing care. Heterogeneity was detected by I² method, and a random-effect model was applied for data pooling if there existed heterogeneity. Publication bias was analysed by a funnel plot. Eight studies with 762 patients were included for final meta-analysis. In the nursing care intervention group, shorter hospital stay duration (pooled SMD = −2.602, 95% confidence interval: −4.052–−1.151), shorter wound healing time (pooled SMD = −1.105, 95% confidence interval: −1.857–−0.353), lower pain score (pooled SMD = −2.490, 95% confidence interval: −3.521–−1.458), lower drainage tube blocked rate (pooled RR = 0.361, 95% confidence interval: 0.268–0.486), and higher nursing satisfaction (pooled RR = 1.164, 95% confidence interval: 1.095–1.237) was confirmed. More active and incentive nursing care could significantly improve the therapeutic effect of VSD on wound healing, in terms of hospitalisation time, wound healing time, painful symptoms, drainage tube blockage, and nursing satisfaction.     

Incidence and predictors of sternal surgical wound infection in cardiac surgery: A prospective study

Sternal surgical wound infection (SSWI) in cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity. We investigated the incidence of SSWI, the main germs implicated and predictors of SSWI. Prospective study including patients undergoing full median sternotomy between January 2017 and December 2019. Patients were followed-up for 3 months after hospital discharge. All sternal wound infections up to 90 days after discharge were considered SSWI. 1004 patients were included. During follow-up, 68 (6.8%) patients presented SSWI. Patients with SSWI had a higher incidence of postoperative renal failure (29.4% vs 17.1%, P = .007), a higher incidence of early postoperative reoperation for non-infectious causes (42.6% vs 9.1%, P < .001), longer ICU stay (3 [2–9] days vs 2 [2–4] days, P = .006), and longer hospital stay (24.5 [14.8–38.3] days vs 10 [7–18] days, P < .001). Gram-positive germs were presented in 49% of the cultures, and gram-negative bacteria in 35%. Early reoperation for non-infectious causes (OR 4.90, 95% CI 1.03–23.7), and a longer ICU stay (OR 1.37 95% CI 1.10–1.72) were independent predictors of SSWI. SSWI is rare but leads to more postoperative complications. The need for early reoperation because of non-infectious cause and a longer ICU stay were independently associated with SSWI.     

27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery compared with 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery on wound closure and need for wound suture and other postoperative parameters in the treatment of vitreoretinal disease: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery compared with 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery on wound closure and the need for wound suture and other postoperative parameters in the treatment of vitreoretinal disease. A systematic literature search up to June 2022 was performed and 1264 subjects with the vitreoretinal disease at the baseline of the studies; 562 of them were using the 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery, and 722 were using 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery. Odds ratio (OR), and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery compared with 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery on wound closure and the need for wound suture and other postoperative parameters in the treatment of vitreoretinal disease using the dichotomous, and contentious methods with a random or fixed-effect model. The 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery subjects had a significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative wound complication (OR, 6.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95, P = .02), and wound suture number (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20-0.71, P = .002), and best corrected visual acuity (MD, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.001, P = .02) compared with 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery in subjects with vitreoretinal disease. However, 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery subjects had no significant difference in the wound closure time (MD, −8.45; 95% CI, −23.44 to 6.55, P = .27), operation time (MD, 0.85; 95% CI, −1.17 to 2.86, P = .41), intraocular pressure at postoperative day 1 (MD, 0.42; 95% CI, −1.45-2.28, P = .66), primary anatomical success rate (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.42-1.63, P = .58), and central macular thickness (MD, 1.81; 95% CI, −21.76 to 25.37, P = .88) compared to 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery in subjects with vitreoretinal disease. The 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery subjects had a significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative wound complication, wound suture number, and best corrected visual acuity, and no significant difference in the wound closure time, operation time, intraocular pressure at postoperative day 1, primary anatomical success rate, and central macular thickness compared to 25-gauge microincision vitrectomy surgery in subjects with vitreoretinal disease. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 12 out of 15 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.     

Negative‐pressure wound therapy for III/IV pressure injuries: A meta‐analysis

This meta‐analysis was conducted to identify the potential benefits and the efficacy of negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for III/IV pressure injuries (PIs) compared with standard wound care (SWC). Sixteen RCTs with 629 patients were included in our analysis. The methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. The outcomes included complete ulcer healing rate, wound healing time, pain score, the frequency of dressing change, hospitalization cost, the condition of the exudate, and the wound improvement. The percentage of healing rate was 61.45% for the NPWT group and 36.90% for SWC (95% CI: 1.32‐1.70). There were significant differences in wound healing time (WMD = ?16.47 days, 95% [CI (?22.36, ? 10.59) days, P ≤ .001]). The pain score and hospitalization cost in NPWT was lower compared with SWC group (WMD = ?2.39, 95% CI [?3.47, ?1.30], P ≤ .001); (SMD = ?2.55, 95% CI [?4.07, ?1.03], P < .01). The frequency of dressing change in both NPWT groups was greatly reduced (SMD = ?3.61, 95% [CI (?4.57, ? 2.66) times, P ≤ .001]). Our meta‐analysis indicated that NPWT was associated with greater improvements in improving PIs and shorting healing time for III/IV PIs. However, this conclusion needs to be confirmed by high‐quality multicenter RCTs.     

Surgical site wound infection and pain after laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

This study aimed to compare the effects of laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) and open repeat liver resection (ORLR) on surgical site wound infection and pain in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data were systematically searched for studies comparing LRLR with ORLR for the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, with a search timeframe from their inception to December 2022. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information, and evaluated the quality of the studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. A total of 20 publications with 4380 patients were included, with 1108 and 3289 patients in the LRLR and ORLR groups, respectively. The results showed that LRLR significantly reduced surgical site wound infection rate (1.71% vs. 5.16%, odds ratio [OR]:0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.56, P < .001), superficial wound infection rate (1.29% vs. 4.92%, OR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.14-0.58, P < .001), bile leakage (3.34% vs. 6.05%, OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39-0.90, P = .01), organ/space wound infection rate (0.4% vs. 5.11%, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.81, P = .02), and surgical site wound pain (mean difference: −2.00, 95% CI: −2.99 to −1.02, P < .001). Thus, the findings of this study showed that LRLR for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma significantly reduced wound infection rates and improved postoperative wound pain.     

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery outcomes among African-Americans and Caucasian patients

There have been few studies to date that investigate the effect of race on outcomes related to coronary artery bypass grafting. The objective of the present study was to investigate race as an independent predictor of outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). A nested case-control study from a twelve-year hospitalization cohort (N=9671) in which data were collected prospectively was conducted. Cases were African-American patients undergoing CABG (N=644). Controls were randomly selected Caucasian patients undergoing CABG (N=1932). Controls were matched to cases 3:1 on year of surgery. Fifteen preoperative and intraoperative risk factors and 14 outcomes were examined. The 14 outcomes of interest were length of stay, readmission to ICU, total ICU stay, total hours on ventilator post-op, reoperation for bleeding/tamponade, deep sternal wound infection, neurological complications, pneumonia, other pulmonary complications, renal failure, gastrointestinal complications, atrial fibrillation requiring treatment, in-hospital mortality, and intraoperative complications. Regression analysis was used to control for risk factors. Multivariate analysis revealed African-Americans were at greater risk for renal complications (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.27-2.77), neurological complications (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.77), and pulmonary complications (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.72-2.59). African Americans had a significantly longer hospitalization post-operatively (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.96), but were less likely to experience post-operative atrial fibrillation requiring treatment than Caucasians (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84). Even after multiple adjustments, African-Americans undergoing CABG surgery had significantly greater morbidity compared to Caucasian patients.     

A meta-analysis examined the effect of topical vancomycin application in decreasing sternal wound infections post cardiac surgery

To assess the impact of topical vancomycin (TV) application in decreasing sternal wound infections (SWIs) post cardiac surgery (CS), we lead a meta-analysis. Twenty-three thousand seven hundred and forty five participants had CS at the outset of the investigations, according to a thorough evaluation of the literature done up to November 2022; 8730 of them used TV, while 15 015 were controls. To assess the effectiveness of TV application in lowering SWIs following CS, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed with dichotomous technique with a fixed- or random-effect model. The TV had significantly lower SWIs post CS (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20–0.57; P < .001), and deep SWIs post CS (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.11–0.65; P = .004) compared with control as shown in Figures 2 and 3. Yet, there was no significant difference found amongst TV and control in superficial SWIs post CS (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.07–1.30; P = .011). The TV had significantly lower SWIs, and deep SWIs post CS, and no significant difference was found in superficial SWIs post CS compared with control. The low number of included studies in this meta-analysis for superficial SWIs calls for precaution when analysing the outcomes.     

Effect of honey dressing in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

A meta-analysis study to assess the effect of honey dressing (HD) in the management of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). A comprehensive literature examination till January 2023 was implemented and 1794 linked studies were appraised. The picked studies contained 882 subjects with DFUs were in the picked studies' baseline, 424 of them were using HD, and 458 were using a control. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the consequence of HD in the management of DFUs after DFU by the dichotomous and continuous styles and a fixed or random model. The HD applied to DFUs caused a significantly higher wound healing rate (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.45-2.93, P < .001) and lower wound healing time (MD, −10.42; 95% CI, −16.27- −4.58, P < .001) compared with the control. The HD applied to DFUs caused a significantly higher wound healing rate and lower wound healing time compared with the control. Although precautions should be taken when commerce with the consequences since most of the picked studies for this meta-analysis was with low sample sizes.     

Impact of negative pressure wound drainage compared with natural wound drainage after thyroid tumour surgery: A meta-analysis

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of negative pressure wound drainage to that of spontaneous wound drainage after thyroid tumour surgery. A thorough analysis of the literature up to July 2022 revealed that, of the 1234 patients who used surgery for thyroid tumours, 615 used negative pressure wound drainage and 619 used natural wound drainage. To measure the influence of negative pressure wound drainage in comparison to natural wound drainage following thyroid tumour surgery, mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were measured using the contentious and dichotomous approaches with a random or fixed-effect model. Subjects who used negative pressure wound drainage had significantly higher averages for drained material (OR, 12.52; 95% CI, 6.78-18.26, P = 0.001), shorter drain placement times (MD, −1.06; 95% CI, 1.57 to −0.55, P = .001), lower rates of infection at the surgical site (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.05-0.60, P = .006), higher rates of wound healing (OR, 5.91; 95% CI, 1.56-22.34, P = .009), and lower rate of wound seroma (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.42, P < .001) in subjects after thyroid tumour surgery in comparison to subjects who used natural wound drainage after thyroid tumour surgery. Those who used negative pressure wound drainage had significantly higher averages of drained material, shorter drain placement times, lower rates of wound infection at the surgical site, higher rates of wound healing, and lower rates of wound seroma. Care must be used when analysing the results because of the small sample size of 7 of the 13 studies included in the meta-analysis and the lack of studies in several comparisons.