Surgical treatment of large incisional hernias by an intraperitoneal Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic problems of giant incisional hernias of the abdominal wall are difficult to resolve. The technique of repair must make up for the loss of abdominal wall substance and reestablish the interplay of the abdominal musculature. The use of prosthetic materials complies with these two imperatives. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of postoperative incisional hernias by intraperitoneal insertion of Dacron (DuPont) mesh and an aponeurotic graft. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively studied 350 consecutive patients who were operated on for giant postoperative incisional hernia. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality was 0.6%. Seven patients (2%) developed subcutaneous infections that did not affect the prostheses. Another seven patients (2%) developed deep-seated infections that necessitated removal of the mesh in five cases. Eleven patients (3.1%) had recurrence of incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study shows that the intraperitoneal positioning of Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft can efficiently treat giant abdominal wall hernias.     

Surgical treatment of post-operative incisional hernias by intra-peritoneal insertion of a Dacron mesh

Summary The authors report a series of 220 cases of post-operative incisional hernias, treated between 1982 and 1996, by the insertion of a Dacron mesh within the intra-peritoneal cavity. Post-operative mortality was recorded to be 1%. Five patients (2.27%) developed a deep seated infection which necessitated removal of the mesh. Eight patients presented with a recurrence (3.6%). This retrospective study tends to show that giant abdominal wall hernias can be efficiently treated by the intraperitoneal positioning of a Dacron mesh.     

改良Stoppa技术修补巨大腹壁切口疝和缺损(31例报告)

目的总结应用改良的Stoppa技术修补腹壁巨大切口疝和缺损的经验。方法31例腹壁巨大切口疝，腹壁缺损平均直径14．7cm。将聚丙烯网片或复合补片置入腹肌后筋膜前间隙修补，但对缺损边缘不强行拉拢缝合。结果术后无一例发生皮下积液及切口感染。30例患者获得随访，随访时间2～36个月，平均25个月，无一例复发。结论改良的Stoppa技术是无张力修补巨大腹壁切口疝和缺损安全和合理的方法。     

Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh

Background Very large and complex incisional hernias, especially those involving loss of abdominal wall, present a particular challenge to the surgeon. Aims The open intraperitoneal technique was used prospectively for the repair of incisional hernias in a selected group of patients with large defects, often those with major loss of abdominal wall, overweight patients, and previous failures of incisional repair. Materials and methods Between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2005, out of 275 patients operated on for incisional hernia repair, 61 of them, most of whom were obese with multiorificial recurrent or giant hernias and contraindicated for laparoscopy, were treated using an open intraperitoneal mesh technique. There were 50 females and 11 males, with a mean age of 61. The median ASA score of the group was 2.3, with a mean BMI of 34 kg/m² and a mean hernia surface of 182 cm². Sixty-four percent of the patients had undergone one or more previous incisional hernia repairs. Results Mean operating time was 130 min, with an average hospital stay of 13 days. None of the patients died. Postoperative complications occurred in 21% of the patients; most of which were minor, but two cases (3.3%) developed deep abscesses requiring surgery and removal of the mesh. A recurrence rate of 5% was found after a mean follow-up of 35 months (8–88). Conclusion Open intraperitoneal mesh repair appears to be a good option for the treatment of complex incisional hernia (at least 10 cm in diameter or multiorificial) in obese patients contraindicated for laparoscopy.     

Repair of midline incisional hernias using the Lazaro da Silva aponeuroplasty technique

STUDY AIM: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess Lazaro da Silva's rectus sheath aponeuroplasty technique for repair of midline incisional hernias situated above the arcuate line. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Twenty-six patients underwent surgical repair of a supraumbilical (n = 19) or periumbilical (n = 7) incisional hernia. Six patients had had repeated laparotomies and two of them had recurrent incisional hernia. There were 11 obese patients (42%). Muscle diastasis ranged from 4 to 20 centimeters (mean: 9.7 cm). Three overlapping aponeurotic and peritoneal layers were used. The peritoneal sac was partially or totally incorporated in the repair. RESULTS: There was one postoperative death at day 5 from acute pancreatitis in a patient with associated cholecystectomy. Postoperative complications occurred in six patients. There were 3 abdominal wall infections. Obesity was the main factor associated with operative complications (p = 0.03). Mean follow-up was 19.1 months. There were 2 recurrences, one of them related to an abdominal wall infection. CONCLUSION: The Lazaro da Silva aponeuroplasty technique compares favourably with alternative techniques using mesh implants. It is indicated for incisional hernias less than 20 centimeters wide, situated above the arcuate line.     

Incisional hernia treatment with progressive pneumoperitoneum and retromuscular prosthetic hernioplasty

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Major incisional hernias of the abdominal wall often pose a serious surgical problem. The choice between simple suture repair and mesh repair remains uncertain. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients underwent surgery to repair large abdominal incisional hernias, i.e., with parietal defects of 10 cm or more, by retromuscular prosthetic hernioplasty between 1996 and 1999. All patients were treated preoperatively by progressive pneumoperitoneum and were followed up for 2-5 years (mean 38.3 months). RESULTS: Almost all patients tolerated the pneumoperitoneum; no postoperative death occurred. Six patients developed a subcutaneous infection but none of them required removal of the mesh. Two patients (2.6%) had recurrent incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that pneumoperitoneum is useful in preparing patients for incisional hernioplasty. Retromuscular mesh repair represents an appropriate surgical procedure, particularly in view of its low rate of recurrence.     

Incisional hernia repair after orthotopic liver transplantation: a technique employing an inlay/onlay polypropylene mesh

Background: The literature provides no data on the incidence and operative management of incisional hernias developing after orthotopic liver transplantation. The use of high-dose immunosuppressive agents results in an appreciable delay in wound healing. There is thus a need for a procedure for the reconstruction of the abdominal wall for patients on immunosuppression. The aim of this retrospective study was to establish the incidence of incisional hernias and an analysis of the results after implantation of a polypropylene mesh in inlay–onlay technique after liver transplantation is given.Methods: The basis for the present retrospective investigations was a total of 207 liver transplantations carried out in 192 patients (15 re-transplantations). After performing tensiometry, a polypropylene mesh (Marlex) was implanted to close the hernias using the inlay/onlay technique or a direct closure of the fascia was done. All treated hernias were followed up for a median of 18 months.Results: Among 184 patients, 17 developed incisional hernias after primary direct closure of the abdominal wall, giving an incidence of 9%. In an additional 8 patients an incisional hernia was seen where an absorbable mesh was used to close the abdominal wall after liver transplantation. In addition, there were 25 incisional hernias after 207 liver transplantations (12%). One of 15 (7%) of the surgically repaired hernias with implantation of a polypropylene mesh (Marlex) developed a recurrence. All the 3 patients after direct apposition of the fascia without using a polypropylene mesh suffered a recurrence (3 of 3; 100%). Significant risk factors for developing an incisional hernia were the amount of ascites and the stay in the ICU after transplantation. Neither severe deep nor superficial wound infection nor bowel fistulas were observed after implantation of a inlay/onlay mesh.Conclusion: In patients after liver transplantation, the implantation of a polypropylene mesh proved to be an efficient and safe method of treating incisional hernias. Implantation of a mesh was not associated with an increased infection rate, despite the use of immunosuppression. In view of the high recurrence rate associated with primary closure, mesh implantation should be given preference.     

Outcomes of the open mesh repair of large incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh: our experience with 100 cases

Incisional hernia repair sometimes requires intraperitoneal implantation of a mesh. This becomes necessary when the hernia opening is large, in particular, in patients with a low abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface (AWS/WDS) ratio, in large boundary incisional hernias where the proximity to bone structures or cartilage often complicates retromuscular mesh implantation and in multi-recurrent incisional hernias that are sometimes characterised by an actual loss of abdominal wall tissue. The authors report on the results of a series of 100 incisional hernias treated between 1999 and 2006 using the open technique to implant an intraperitoneal mesh (Parietex Composite). Mean follow-up time was 42 months (range 12–96 months). The mean wall defect surface was 95 cm² (range 60–210 cm²). Twelve percent of patients suffered minor complications: 5 seromas (5%), 3 haematomas (3%) and 4 parietal suppurations (4%). No mesh had to be removed. The recurrence rate was 6%. At 6 months after surgery, no patient lamented pain or discomfort due to foreign body sensation. None of these patients presented intestinal occlusion or enterocutaneous fistulae. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the mesh should be implanted in direct contact with the viscera only where absolutely necessary, i.e., when it cannot be implanted in the retromuscular area without creating excessive parietal tension. Our experience with PC mesh, over the short-to-medium term, was positive. Naturally, further studies are required to evaluate long-term biocompatibility.     

The use of Dacron prostheses in laparoceles

BACKGROUND: Purpose of the study was to evaluate indications and efficacy of Dacron prostheses in the treatment of incisional hernias. METHODS: The study has been carried out in a retrospective way; mean follow-up has been 20 months. Surgical setting has been the Institute of Emergency Surgery at the University of Catania, where about 500 abdominal operations are performed every year. Thirty patients affected by incisional hernias have been considered (mean age 66.8 years). In 12 patients the Mayo technique was performed, whereas a Dacron prosthesis was placed in 18 patients. Other than early postoperative complications, patients have been followed by periodical clinical exams in order to find out possible recurrences as well as other late complications. RESULTS: Among 18 patients treated with insertion of Dacron prosthesis no infection, recurrence, bowel fistula, haematoma or dislocation have been observed. Only in one case an intestinal occlusion secondary to adhesions between prosthesis and bowel has occurred; in this patient a new operation has been necessary to remove the prosthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that prostheses have been used in large incisional hernias or in patients with a weak abdominal wall, the high successful percentage (94%) obtained suggests the use of Dacron prostheses which guarantee long stability and minimum risk of recurrences.     

The Use of Pneumoperitoneum in the Repair of Giant Hernias

Preoperative pneumoperitoneum is used to re-establish the right of domain for abdominal viscera before repair of otherwise inoperable giant abdominal hernias. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use and safety of preoperative pneumoperitoneum in the repair of giant hernias in relation to surgical treatment of obesity. The medical records of patients who underwent preoperative pneumoperitoneum in the treatment of giant hernias between 1953-1993 were reviewed. There were 27 patients (11 males, 16 females; mean age: 56 years) whose mean preoperative weight was 99 kg (range: 69-183). Hernias were predominantly in the midline (17). Other locations were right lower quadrant (5), right upper quadrant (3) and groin (2). The mean duration of preoperative pneumoperitoneum was 28 days (3-100). Subcutaneous emphysema developed in three patients with no sequelae. Primary repair of the giant hernia without Marlex mesh was possible in 19 patients (70%). Marlex mesh was used in seven (26%). One patient had a fascia lata graft. Operative complications were one pulmonary embolus and one hematoma. There were no deaths. We conclude that preoperative pneumoperitoneum is a useful adjunct to giant hernia repair. Severe obesity should be corrected before preoperative pneumoperitoneum and hernia repair. Some patients may need mesh to replace insufficient abdominal wall or to reinforce repair.     

Incidence and management of abdominal closure-related complications in adult intestinal transplantation

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the best strategy to overcome difficult abdominal wall closures in intestinal transplantation (ITx). METHODS: Among 38 adult recipients of 39 ITxs from deceased donors, the median number of previous laparotomies was 2.0 per patient, with a median donor-to-recipient body weight ratio of 1.1. Eight patients (21%) had full residual intestinal length before transplant. Abdominal wall closure after transplant was considered difficult in 15 (39.5%) patients (group A). To overcome size mismatching, we performed two graft reductions, five skin-only closures, one two-step abdominal wall closure, four prosthetic mesh closures, and three abdominal wall transplants. In the remaining 23 (60.5%) patients, a regular abdominal closure was performed (group B). RESULTS: Twelve patients (32%) experienced complications related to abdominal wall closure, 10 (67%) in group A and 2 (8.7%) in group B (P<0.0001). Abdominal closure-related mortality was 6.7% (1/15) and 4.3% (1/23), respectively (P=1.0). In group A, there were six incisional hernias (one of them after abdominal wall transplant), although all four patients with mesh experienced mesh infection. Two of them developed intestinal fistulae, leading to patient death in one case. In group B, one patient with unfavorable donor/recipient size matching had fatal vascular thrombosis of a multivisceral graft caused by compression after abdominal closure. CONCLUSIONS: A careful evaluation of abdominal cavity is necessary in candidates for ITx. In our experience, closure with mesh should be avoided because of the high rate of complications. Abdominal wall transplantation is a feasible option when a difficult abdominal wall closure is expected.     

The ratio between anterior abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface: a new parameter to classify abdominal incisional hernias

Current classifications of incisional hernias are often not suitable. The aim of our study was to demonstrate that it is important to consider not only the wall defect surface (WDS) but also the total surface of the anterior abdominal wall (SAW) and the ratio between SAW/WDS). Twenty-three patients affected by >10 cm size incisional hernias were examined for anthropometric analyses. The SAW, the WDS and the ratio SAW/WDS were calculated. All of the 23 patients were operated on 13 patients were treated with the Rives technique using a polypropylene mesh while the remaning ten patients had an intraperitoneal Parietex Composite mesh (PC). The two groups were compared for post-operative pain (with VAS) and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) 48 h after the operation: bladder pressure, length of the procedure, average hospital stay and return to work were calculated. In the Rives group, WDS being equal, the higher IAP values were, the lower was the ratio SAW/WDS; furthermore, SAW/WDS ratio being equal, IAP values were low in cases where intraperitoneal mesh was used. Post-operative pain, measured with VAS, was critical when there was a low SAW/WDS ratio and a high IAP. In our experience, it is possible to predict a strong abdominal wall tension if the SAW/WDA ratio is below 15 mmHg. In these cases it is advisable to use a technique requiring the use of an intraperitoneal mesh. Our experience with PC was so positive that it is used in our department for all cases where an intraperitoneal mesh is required. At present, our proposal is that the SAW/WDS ratio is to be considered as a new parameter in current classifications of incisional hernias.     

The feasibility of adopting laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in general surgery practice: early outcomes in an unselected series of patients

A laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia repair has been shown to be safe and effective in selected patients. We report our early outcomes following laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVHR) in an unselected series of patients encountered in general surgery practice. All patients referred with incisional hernia were offered a laparoscopic repair using prosthetic mesh. Patients were not excluded from laparoscopic approach on the basis of age, previous surgery, defect size, intraperitoneal mesh, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, or abdominal wall stomas. We followed 28 consecutive patients who underwent LVHR (17 primary, 11 recurrent hernias). Laparoscopic repair was completed in 27 patients with a mean operative time of 141.6 +/- 11.9 minutes. There were no intraoperative complications. The mean size of the abdominal wall defects was 153.4 +/- 27.5 cm and the mean mesh size was 349.2 +/- 59.1 cm. The mean hospital stay was 3.7 +/- 0.3 days. Nine patients developed large wound seromas; all spontaneously resolved. Our experience suggests that LVHR is feasible as a primary approach to most incisional hernias encountered in general surgery practice.     

Incisional hernia of the abdominal wall. Pathophysiology, etiology and prosthetic repair techniques]

Postoperative incisional hernia is defined by 3 essential criteria, based on a perfect clinico-pathological knowledge of the abdominal wall: the site, dimensions, and defect. Two main elements predispose to incisional hernia: infection and mechanical factors. Local and systemic complications, accentuated in large incisional hernias, are respectively defined by two concepts: "incisional hernia lesion" and "incisional hernia disease". Precise assessment of these elements can guide the surgeon's operative strategy. Incisional hernias remain a relatively frequent complication of abdominal surgery. All of these patients generally require surgical repair of the abdominal wall. A French national survey showed that most surgeons now use prosthetic materials in 60% of primary repairs, and in 85% of recurrent cases. After reviewing the biomechanical characteristics and the in vivo behaviour of commercially available prostheses, the technical principles of prosthetic abdominal wall surgery will be considered together with the various implantation sites: retromuscular, intraperitoneal and premuscular. Based on their personal experience of 110 cases of large incisional hernias, treated between 1989 and 1998, the authors recommend the intraperitoneal position using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, a reliable material which is well tolerated in contact with the viscera.     

Elective colonic operation and prosthetic repair of incisional hernia: does contamination contraindicate abdominal wall prosthesis use?

BACKGROUND: Wound infection and sepsis leading to incisional hernia development are common after emergency colonic operations. Later on, while being operated on to correct an incisional hernia, most of these patients will need colonic resection or bowel continuity reestablishment. Simultaneous treatment of incisional hernias in patients with colostomy or colonic disease remains a difficult challenge, considering the reluctance of most surgeons to treat both conditions at the same time, especially when prosthetic repair is needed. STUDY DESIGN: The aim of this study was to analyze the short-term results of patients undergoing colonic resection or bowel continuity reestablishment and simultaneous incisional hernia repair with an onlay polypropylene mesh technique. Over a period of 6 years, 20 patients were operated on for colonic problems associated with incisional hernias, including 8 Hartmanns' colostomies, 6 colostomies or ileostomies with colonic mucous fistulas, 3 postoperative colocutaneous fistulas, a paracolostomic hernia, a Chagas' megacolon, and a pseudotumoral diverticulitis. A "rule of three" statistical analysis was used to estimate the maximum risk of adverse effects, concerning mesh-related morbidity, after 1- and 2-year followup. RESULTS: A major complication occurred in a patient who developed an anastomotic leakage and secondary wound infection; the patient was treated with parenteral nutrition and antibiotics. Other complications included a minor wound infection, a seroma, and a chronic sinus. One patient died from postoperative problems unrelated to the surgical technique. The occurrence of postoperative wound infection did not prevent mesh incorporation. Followup ranging from 1 to 7 years detected no hernia recurrences; 13 patients were followed for 2 years or more. Our results suggest that risk of mesh-related morbidity does not exceed 15.8% (3 of 19) within the first year and 23.1% (3 of 13) for 2 years followup, with 95% confidence. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that prosthetic repair of incisional hernias associated with simultaneous colonic operations was possible, allowing abdominal wall anatomy reestablishment. There is no reason to believe that abdominal wall prostheses must be avoided in contaminated operations when an adequate surgical technique is used.     

Intraperitoneal modification of the Rives-Stoppa repair for large incisional hernias

Introduction Recurrence rates for open repair of ventral/incisonal hernias historically range from 6% for the classic Rives-Stoppa repair to 35–45% for some of the techniques more commonly used in the United States. We report a modification to the classic Rives-Stoppa repair that allows intraperitoneal placement of the prosthetic, secured with a running suture. The abdominal muscles are closed over the mesh to protect it from any superficial wound problems that might develop and to restore normal architecture of the abdominal wall. Method A chart review was undertaken on all patients undergoing open ventral incisional hernia repair by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2006. All hernias were repaired with the intraperitoneal modification mimicking the principles of the Rives-Stoppa repair. Patient characteristics and operative and postoperative data were collected. Primary outcome was recurrence of hernia. Secondary outcomes were complications and rate of mesh infection. Results One hundred and fifteen patients were evaluated. Thirty-four patients had repair of recurrent ventral hernias. The average patient was obese, female, and 59 years old. Twenty-five patients used tobacco, eleven were diabetic, and seven used chronic corticosteroids. Meshes utilized included ePTFE, coated polyester, coated polypropylene, and biologic mesh. Average size of mesh was 465.4 cm². There were four recurrences (3.4%), three of which were due to mesh infection requiring mesh removal. Recurrence rate not secondary to mesh removal was 0.9%. Complications occurred in 26% with seroma formation being the most frequent (16%). Conclusion The intraperitoneal modification to the original Rives-Stoppa repair leads to a very low recurrence rate for large ventral hernia repairs with minimal complications and low rate of mesh infection. Presented at the 2007 American Hernia Society Meeting, Hollywood, FL, USA.     

Concurrent Gastric Bypass and Repair of Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias

Background: Many patients seeking surgical treatment for morbid obesity present with anterior abdominal wall hernias. Although principles of hernia repair involve a tension-free repair with the use of prosthetic mesh, there is concern about the use of mesh in gastric bypass surgery due to potential contamination with the contents of the gastrointestinal tract and resultant mesh infection. We report our series of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and simultaneous anterior abdominal wall hernia repair. Methods: All patients who underwent simultaneous RYGBP surgery and anterior abdominal wall hernia repair were reviewed. Results: 12 patients underwent concurrent RYGBP and anterior wall hernia repair. There were 5 women and 7 men with average age 54.9 ± 8.5 years (range 35 to 64) and average body mass index (BMI) 50.4 ± 10.3 kg/m² (range 38 to 70). Two open and 10 laparoscopic RYGBP operations were performed. Nine patients (75%) underwent incisional hernia repairs and 3 patients (25%) underwent umbilical hernia repair concurrent with gastric bypass. Average size of defect was 14.7 ± 13.4 cm². One patient had primary repair and 11 patients had prosthetic mesh repair: polypropylene in 3 patients (25%) and polyester in 8 patients (67%). With a 14.1 ± 9.3 month follow-up, there have been no mesh infections and 2 recurrences, one in the patient who underwent primary repair and one in a patient repaired with polyester mesh but with two previous failed incisional hernia repairs. Conclusion: Concurrent RYGBP and repair of anterior abdominal wall hernias is safe and feasible. In order to optimize success, tension-free principles of hernia repair with the use of prosthetic mesh should be followed since no mesh infections occurred in our series.     

The Analysis of Infection after Polypropylene Mesh Repair of Abdominal Wall Hernia

Aim The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of superficial and prosthetic mesh infection following polypropylene mesh repair of different abdominal wall hernia in individual patients and to analyze the manifestation, clinical process and outcomes in patients with prosthetic mesh infection. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 375 patients with 423 implanted meshes for groin, femoral, umbilical, incisional and epigastric hernias, with a mean follow-up of 15 months (range: 3–73 months). Results The total superficial infection rate was 1.65% percnt;, and the rate of mesh infection was 0.94% percnt;. There were no statistically significant differences in prosthetic mesh infection between monofilament and multifilament meshes as well as between the different repair groups of hernias. The deep incisional surgical site infection after previous operation was established as a significant risk factor for prosthetic mesh infection in incisional hernia repair (P < 0.0001). Five cases of prosthetic mesh infection were presented and analyzed. Conclusions There is no correlation between the superficial and prosthetic mesh infection. There may be difficulties in determining mesh infection and to choose the right tactic. The reconvalescence in all patients with mesh infection was achieved only after removal of the infected mesh. An erratum to this article is available at .     

生物补片一期修复污染状态下的腹壁疝和腹壁缺损

目的：评价生物补片用于污染或感染状态下腹壁缺损一期修复的安全性和有效性。方法 2010年4月以来17例腹壁缺损手术均因肠外瘘或肠造口、切口感染或同时肠道手术等原因而处于感染或污染状态：切口疝6例,腹股沟嵌顿疝1例,肠外瘘8例、直肠癌柱状切除术2例。腹壁缺损范围在(3 cm ×2 cm)～(6 cm×17 cm),均采用...     

Day surgery for laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias

Laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias is still a controversial and nongeneralized therapeutic option. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the results of laparoscopic surgery on abdominal wall hernias at a day-surgery unit and to describe our procedure protocol. Prospective analysis of 300 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for abdominal wall hernias was conducted: 260 preperitoneal and 40 intraperitoneal. The patients' clinical features, hernia type, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and follow-up are studied for both types of surgery. All the patients receiving surgery with extraperitoneal laparoscopy were completed as a day-surgical procedure with a rate of conversion to open surgery of 2.3%. Twelve (30%) of the 40 patients operated on for ventral hernias using intraperitoneal laparoscopy required hospitalization: five for perioperative complications and seven for pain (16%). There was no case of infection or mesh rejection. The recurrence rates were 0.78% (two cases) for the inguinal hernias and 2.5% (one case) for the ventral hernias. In conclusion, laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall hernias in a day-surgery setting is an efficient alternative to open surgery. Electronic Publication