1,3-Dialkyl-8-(p-sulfophenyl)xanthines: potent water-soluble antagonists for A1- and A2-adenosine receptors

A series of 8-(substituted phenyl) derivatives of theophylline and other 1,3-dialkylxanthines were evaluated for potency and selectivity as antagonists at A1- and A2-adenosine receptors in brain tissue. Theophylline has a similar potency (Ki = 14 microM) at both A1 and A2 receptors. 8-Phenyltheophylline is 25-35-fold more potent as an adenosine receptor antagonist than theophylline, while 8-phenylcaffeine is only 2-3-fold more potent than caffeine. A p-hydroxyaryl substituent enhances the potency of 8-phenyltheophylline as an adenosine antagonist. p-Carboxy- and p-sulfoaryl substituents reduce potency of 8-phenyltheophylline, yielding water-soluble adenosine antagonists, which are some 2-5-fold more potent than theophylline at adenosine receptors. None of the 8-(substituted phenyl)theophyllines are particularly selective as antagonists toward A1- and A2-adenosine receptors. 1,3-Dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine represents a potent and somewhat selective A1-receptor antagonist about 23-fold more potent at A1 receptors than at A2 receptors. A p-hydroxyaryl substituent further enhances potency of the 1,3-dipropyl-8-phenylxanthine at both A1 and A2 receptors. The 8-(2-amino-4-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine is a very potent and selective antagonist for A1 receptors, being nearly 400-fold more potent at A1 than at A2 receptors. The water-soluble 8-(p-sulfophenyl)- and 8-(p-carboxyphenyl)-1,3-propylxanthines no longer exhibit marked selectivity. Both compounds are much more potent as adenosine antagonists than theophylline. The striking selectivity of 1-isoamyl-3-isobutylxanthine as an A1 antagonist is retained in the 8-phenyl derivative but is virtually lost in the 8-p-sulfophenyl derivative.     

Analogues of caffeine and theophylline: effect of structural alterations on affinity at adenosine receptors

A variety of analogues of caffeine and theophylline in which the 1-,3-, and 7-methyl substituents have been replaced with n-propyl, allyl, propargyl, and isobutyl and, in a few cases, with chloroethyl, hydroxyethyl, or benzyl were assessed for potency and selectivity as antagonists at A1- and A2-adenosine receptors in brain tissue. Caffeine and theophylline are nonselective for these receptors. Nearly all of the 22 analogues of caffeine are more potent than caffeine itself at adenosine receptors. Replacement of the 1-methyl moiety with n-propyl, allyl, or propargyl substituent has little effect on potency at the A1 receptor while enhancing potency about 7- to 10-fold at the A2 receptor. 3,7-Di-methyl-1-propylxanthine is only slightly (1.4-fold) more potent than caffeine at the A1 receptor while being 10-fold more potent at the A2 receptor. 1,3-Di-n-propyl-7-methylxanthine is also selective for the A2 receptor, being 8-fold more potent than caffeine at the A1 receptor and 40-fold more potent at the A2 receptor. A number of other caffeine analogues including 3,7-dimethyl-1-n-propylxanthine, 7-allyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine, and 1,3-dimethyl-7-propargylxanthine are also somewhat selective for the A2 receptor. The most potent caffeine analogue was 1,3-di-n-propyl-7-propargylxanthine, which was about 100-fold more potent than caffeine at both A1 and A2 receptors. The 10 theophylline analogues were relatively nonselective except for the 1-ethyl analogue and the 1,3-diallyl analogue, which were selective for the A2 receptor, and the 1,3-di-n-propyl, 1,3-diisobutyl, and 1,3-dibenzyl analogues, which were somewhat selective for the A1 receptor. 1,3-Di-n-propylxanthine was 20-fold more potent than theophylline at the A1 receptor and 5-fold more potent at the A2 receptor.     

Structure-activity relationships of 8-cycloalkyl-1,3-dipropylxanthines as antagonists of adenosine receptors.

8-Substituted xanthines currently represent the most potent class of adenosine-receptor antagonists. A series of 8-substituted 1,3-dipropylxanthines was prepared and their potency as antagonists of A1 and A2 adenosine receptors of human platelets and rat adipocytes, respectively, were determined. No agents studied were as potent as 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine as antagonists of the A1 adenosine receptor, but 8-(2-methylcyclopropyl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine was at least 1000-fold more potent as an antagonist of A1 than of A2 adenosine receptors. While most substitutions on the 8-cycloalkyl moiety caused decreased potency to inhibit both A1 and A2 adenosine receptors, 8-[trans-4-(acetamidomethyl)cyclohexyl]-1,3-dipropylxanthine was nearly equipotent as an antagonist of the two receptors and appeared to be the most potent antagonist of A2 adenosine receptors reported to date.     

Non-xanthine heterocycles: activity as antagonists of A1- and A2-adenosine receptors

A variety of non-xanthine heterocycles were found to be antagonists of binding of [3H]phenylisopropyladenosine to rat brain A1-adenosine receptors and of activation of adenylate cyclase via interaction of N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine with A2-adenosine receptors in human platelet and rat phenochromocytoma cell membranes. The pyrazolopyridines tracazolate, cartazolate and etazolate were several fold more potent than theophylline at both A1- and A2-adenosine receptors. The pyrazolopyridines, however, were still many fold less potent than 8-phenyltheophylline and other 8-phenyl-1,3-dialkylxanthines. A structurally related N6-substituted 9-methyladenine was also a potent adenosine antagonist with selectivity for A1 receptors. None of several aryl-substituted heterocycles, including a thiazolopyrimidine, imidazopyridines, benzimidazoles, a pyrazoloquinoline, a mesoionic xanthine analog and a triazolopyridazine exhibited the high potency typical of 8-phenyl-1,3-dialkylxanthines. A furyl-substituted triazoloquinazoline was very potent at both A1 and A2 receptors. A pteridin-2,4-dione, 1,3-dipropyllumazine, was somewhat less potent than theophylline at A1- and A2-adenosine receptors, whereas 1,3-dimethyllumazine was much less potent. A benzopteridin-2,4-dione, alloxazine, was somewhat more potent than theophylline. Other heterocycles with antagonist activity were the dibenzazepine carbamazepine and beta-carboline-3-ethyl carboxylate. The phenylimidazoline clonidine had no activity, whereas a related dihydroxyphenylimidazoline was a weak non-competitive adenosine antagonist.     

PAEONIFLORIN REVERSES GUANETHIDINE-INDUCED HYPOTENSION VIA ACTIVATION OF CENTRAL ADENOSINE A1 RECEPTORS IN WISTAR RATS

1. Intravenous injection of paeoniflorin, a glycoside purified from the root of Paeonia lactiflora, reversed guanethidine-induced hypotension in Wistar rats. 2. Pretreatment with the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine inhibited this effect of paeoniflorin in a dose-dependent manner. 3. The action of paeoniflorin was not modified by 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline, the polar antagonist of the adenosine A1 receptor, which is not able to enter the central nervous system. 4. We conclude that paeoniflorin can reverse guanethidine-induced hypotension via activation of adenosine A1 receptors in the brain of Wistar rats.     

Effects of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists in a genetic animal model of primary paroxysmal dystonia

1. Recent studies have shown beneficial effects of an adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist in dt(sz) mutant hamsters, an animal model of paroxysmal dystonia, in which stress and consumption of coffee can precipitate dystonic attacks. This prompted us to examine the effects of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists on severity of dystonia in dt(sz) hamsters in more detail. 2. The non-selective adenosine A(1)/A(2A) receptor antagonists, caffeine (10 - 20 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and theophylline (10 - 30 mg kg(-1) s.c.), worsened the dystonia in dt(sz) hamsters. 3. Aggravation of dystonia was also caused by the selective adenosine A(1)/A(2A) antagonist CGS 15943 (9-chloro2-2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]quinazolin-5-amine) at a dose of 30 mg kg(-1) i.p. and by the adenosine A(1) antagonist DPCPX (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine; 20 - 30 mg kg(-1) i.p.), while the A(2) antagonist DMPX (3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine; 2 - 4 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and the highly selective A(2A) antagonist ZM 241385 (4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol; 2 - 5 mg kg(-1) i.p.) failed to exert any effects on dystonia. 4. In contrast to the antagonists, both the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist CPA (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine; 0.1 - 1.0 mg kg(-1) i.p.) and the A(2A) agonist CGS 21680 (2p-(2carboxyethylphen-ethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamindoadenosine; 0.1 - 2.0 mg kg(-1) i.p.) exerted a striking improvement of dystonia. 5. These data suggest that the precipitating effects of methylxanthines are, at least in part, related to their adenosine receptor antagonistic action. 6. Although adenosine receptor agonists can be regarded as interesting candidates for the therapy of paroxysmal dystonia, adverse effects may limit the therapeutic potential of adenosine A(1) agonists, while beneficial effects of the adenosine A(2A) agonist CGS 21680 were already found at well tolerated doses.     

Decrease in cold tolerance of aged rats caused by the enhanced endogenous adenosine activity.

During severe cold exposure, old rats (24-28 months) were less capable of maintaining their body temperature compared to young rats (3-6 months) due to lower rate of heat production. Single injection of adenosine deaminase (AD) (converts adenosine to inosine) significantly increased thermogenesis in both young and old rats. However, doubling the dose of AD was required for optimal thermogenic response in old rats. In contrast, the similar enhancements in both thermogenesis and cold tolerance were observed in both young and old rats receiving the same optimal doses of specific adenosine receptor antagonists. These results lead to the suggestion that the lower capability of aged rats to withstand cold exposure could be due to an increase in adenosine stimulation because of the decreased endogenous AD activity rather than an increase in adenosine receptor sensitivity. This notion is further supported by the finding that the AD activity in the neck muscle, a key site for shivering thermogenesis, was significantly lower in old rats as compared to their younger counterparts before and after cold exposure.     

Lack of tolerance to motor stimulant effects of a selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist

It is well known that tolerance develops to the actions of caffeine, which acts as an antagonist on adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors. Since selective adenosine A(2A) antagonists have been proposed as adjuncts to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) therapy in Parkinson's disease we wanted to examine if tolerance also develops to the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist 5-amino-7-(2-phenylethyl)-2-(2-furyl)-pyrazolo-[4,3-e]-1,2, 4-triazolo [1,5-c]pyrimidine (SCH 58261). SCH 58261 (0.1 and 7.5 mg/kg) increased basal locomotion and the motor stimulation afforded by apomorphine. Neither effect was subject to tolerance following long-term treatment with the same doses given intraperitoneally twice daily. There were no adaptive changes in A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors or their corresponding messenger RNA or in dopamine D(1) or D(2) receptors. These results demonstrate that the tolerance that develops to caffeine is not secondary to its inhibition of adenosine A(2A) receptors. The results also offer hope that long-term treatment with an adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist may be possible in man.     

Adenosine A1 receptors and the anticonvulsant potential of drugs effective in the model of 3-nitropropionic acid-induced seizures in mice.

The role of adenosine A1 receptors in the activity of drugs and substances protecting against seizures evoked by mitochondrial toxin, 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NPA) was studied in mice. Non-selective A1/A2 adenosine receptor antagonist, aminophylline and selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) diminished the anticonvulsive effects of diazepam, phenobarbital, valproate and gabapentin. In contrast, A1/A2 adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline (8pSPT) not penetrating via blood-brain barrier was ineffective. Aminophylline and DPCPX but not 8pSPT also reversed the protective action of A1/A2 adenosine receptor agonist, 2-chloroadenosine (2-CADO) and selective A1 adenosine receptor agonist, R-N6-phenylisopropyloadenosine (R-PIA), against 3-NPA-evoked convulsions. Obtained results suggest that the central adenosine A1 receptor stimulation may play a role in the anticonvulsive potential of diazepam, phenobarbital, valproate and gabapentin in a novel model of 3-NPA-evoked seizures. Moreover, concomitant application of aminophylline with these drugs may reduce their clinical antiepileptic efficacy, especially among patients suffering from seizures related to the disturbances of mitochondrial respiratory chain.     

Effects of 8-phenyl and 8-cycloalkyl substituents on the activity of mono-, di-, and trisubstituted alkylxanthines with substitution at the 1-, 3-, and 7-positions

The effects of 8-phenyl and 8-cycloalkyl substituents on the activity of theophylline, caffeine, 1,3-dipropylxanthine, 1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine, 3-propylxanthine, and 1-propylxanthine at A1 adenosine receptors of rat brain and fat cells and at A2 adenosine receptors of rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells and human platelets are compared. An 8-phenyl substituent has little effect on the activity of caffeine or 1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine at adenosine receptors, while markedly increasing activity of theophylline, 1,3-dipropylxanthine, 1-isoamyl-3-isobutylxanthine, 1-methylxanthine, and 3-propylxanthine. 8-Phenyl-1-propylxanthine is potent (Ki = 20-70 nM) at all receptors. A p-carboxy or p-sulfo substituent, which is introduced on the 8-phenyl ring to increase water solubility, in most cases decreases the activity and selectivity for the A1 receptor. Among the 8-p-sulfo analogues, only 8-(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline and 1,3-dipropyl-8-(p-sulfophenyl)xanthine are selective for the A1 receptors. 8-p-Sulfophenyl derivatives of caffeine, 1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine, and 3-propylxanthine are somewhat selective for the A2 receptors. 8-Cycloalkyl substituents (cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl) markedly increase activity of caffeine and 1,3-dipropyl-7-methylxanthine at the A2 receptor. 8-Cyclohexylcaffeine is potent (Ki = 190 nM) and very selective for the human platelet A2 receptors, but is not as selective for the rat PC12 cell A2 receptor. Such A2 selectivity is in contrast to the marked A1 selectivity of 8-cycloalkyltheophyllines and 8-cycloalkyl-1,3-dipropulxanthines. The apparent selectivity of certain xanthines is dependent on the assay systems that are compared.     

Role of central and peripheral adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular responses to intraperitoneal injections of adenosine A1 and A2A subtype receptor agonists

1. The cardiovascular effects of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and the adenosine A2A receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) were investigated in rats implanted with telemetry transmitters for the measurement of blood pressure and heart rate. 2. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist CPA led to dose-dependent decreases in both blood pressure and heart rate. These effects of 0.3 mg kg(-1) CPA were antagonized by i.p. injections of the adenosine A1 receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethyl-xanthine (CPT), but not by i.p. injections of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist 3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-8-(m-methoxystyryl)-7-methyl-1-propargylxanthine phosphate disodium salt (MSX-3). Injections (i.p.) of the peripherally acting nonselective adenosine antagonist 8-sulfophenyltheophylline (8-SPT) and the purported nonselective adenosine antagonist caffeine also antagonized the cardiovascular effects of CPA. 3. The adenosine A2A agonist CGS 21680 given i.p. produced a dose-dependent decrease in blood pressure and an increase in heart rate. These effects of 0.5 mg kg(-1) CGS 21680 were antagonized by i.p. injections of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist MSX-3, but not by i.p. injections of the antagonists CPT, 8-SPT or caffeine. 4. Central administration (intracerebral ventricular) of CGS 21680 produced an increase in heart rate, but no change in blood pressure. MSX-3 given i.p. antagonized the effects of the central injection of CGS 21680. 5. These results suggest that adenosine A1 receptor agonists produce decreases in blood pressure and heart rate that are mediated by A1 receptors in the periphery, with little or no contribution of central adenosine A1 receptors to those effects. 6. The heart rate increasing effect of adenosine A2A agonists appears to be mediated by adenosine A2A receptors in the central nervous system. The blood pressure decreasing effect of adenosine A2A agonists is most probably mediated in the periphery.     

Accumulations of inositol phosphates and cyclic AMP in brain slices: synergistic interactions of histamine and 2-chloroadenosine

2-Chloroadenosine, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine, N6-cyclohexyladenosine and other adenosine analogs enhance histamine-elicited, but not norepinephrine- or carbamylcholine-elicited accumulations of inositol phosphates in [3H]inositol-labeled guinea-pig cerebral cortical slices. The adenosine analogs alone have no effect on accumulations of inositol phosphates. The effect of 2-chloroadenosine is blocked by the adenosine receptor antagonists theophylline and 1,3-dialkyl-8-p-sulfophenylxanthines. The rank order of activity of the six adenosine analogs with respect to augmentation of histamine-elicited accumulation of inositol phosphates in guinea-pig cerebral cortical slices is different from the rank order at an A2-adenosine receptor that mediates synergistic accumulations of cyclic AMP by adenosine analogs and histamine in guinea-pig cerebral cortical slices.     

Functional characterization of adenosine receptors in the nucleus tractus solitarius mediating hypotensive responses in the rat.

1. The aim of this study was to characterize adenosine receptors located in the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) that mediate decreases in blood pressure in the anaesthetized rat. To determine the adenosine receptor subtype involved, a range of selective agonists and antagonists were studied and their relative potencies evaluated. 2. The rank order of agonist potency in inducing decreases in diastolic blood pressure was N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) > N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) > N-ethyl-carboxamidoadenosine (NECA) > or = 2-phenylaminoadenosine (CV1808) > 2-p-(carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5' N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) > N6-(2-(4-aminophenyl)ethyl)-adenosine (APNEA). 3. The hypotensive action of CPA following microinjection into the NTS was antagonized by i.v. infusions (50 micrograms kg-1 min-1) of adenosine receptor antagonists, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3 dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT), 8-(p-sulphophenyl)theophylline (8-SPT), and 1,3-dipropyl-8-N-(2-diethylamino)ethyl)-N methyl-4-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo) benzenesulphonamidexanthine (PD 115199). The antagonist potency order was DPCPX > PD115199 > or = 8-PT. Intravenous infusion of 8-SPT had no effect on blood pressure responses to microinjection of CPA into the NTS. 4. The results suggest that adenosine A1 receptors in the NTS mediate hypotensive responses in the anaesthetized rat preparation.     

A new class of adenosine receptors in brain. Characterization by 2-chloro[3H]adenosine binding

Micromolar concentrations of adenosine and its analogs have profound depressant effects on neuronal firing and synaptic transmission in many brain areas. Using the adenosine agonist 2-chloro[3H]adenosine (Cl[3H]Ado), we have identified a distinct class of micromolar-affinity adenosine binding sites in rat forebrain membranes. Specific Cl[3H]Ado binding was reversible and saturable with an apparent KD of 9.1 microM and a Bmax of 61 pmoles/mg protein. The present studies were conducted using washed brain membrane fractions not treated with adenosine deaminase. Specific Cl[3H]Ado binding under these conditions was insensitive to (-)-N6-(R-phenylisopropyl)adenosine ((-)PIA) and treatment with 3 mM N-ethylmaleimide, unlike high-affinity A1 adenosine receptor binding. Treatment of membranes with adenosine deaminase revealed an additional population of binding sites sensitive to (-)PIA. Inhibition of Cl[3H]Ado binding by adenosine analogs exhibited an order of potency ClAdo greater than 5'-N-ethylcarboxamide adenosine (NECA) greater than (-)PIA which differs from that of both A1 and A2 adenosine receptors. The potent A1 and A2 receptor antagonist 8-phenyltheophylline had no significant effect on binding up to 10 microM. Specific binding, however, was inhibited by the adenosine antagonists 8(p-sulfophenyl)theophylline, isobutylmethylxanthine, theophylline, and caffeine. Micromolar Cl[3H]Ado binding was highly selective for adenosine agonists and antagonists. These results suggest that the micromolar-affinity Cl[3H]Ado binding sites may represent a novel central purinergic receptor, distinct from the A1 and A2 adenosine receptors involved in the regulation of adenylate cyclase.     

Actions of specific adenosine receptor A1 and A2 agonists and antagonists in recovery of phrenic motor output following upper cervical spinal cord injury in adult rats

1. Previous studies from our laboratory have established that a latent respiratory motor pathway can be activated to restore function to a hemidiaphragm paralysed by upper cervical (C2) spinal cord hemisection during a reflex known as the 'crossed phrenic phenomenon'. In addition, theophylline, a general adenosine A1 and A2 receptor antagonist, can activate the latent pathway by acting centrally through antagonism at adenosine receptors. 2. The present study was designed to assess the relative contributions of adenosine A1 and A2 receptors in inducing functional recovery in our model of spinal cord injury. Specific adenosine A1 and A2 agonists and antagonists were used in an electrophysiological study. 3. Our results demonstrate that, in hemisected rats, systemic administration of the adenosine A1 receptor-specific antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) restores, in a dose-dependent manner, phrenic nerve respiratory related output that is lost following hemisection. Furthermore, DPCPX augments respiratory activity in non-injured animals. The A2 receptor agonist CGS-21680 mediates its effects by predominantly acting on peripheral rather than central nervous system (CNS) receptors. CGS-21680 modulates respiratory related phrenic nerve activity in non-injured animals by enhancing tonic activity, but does not induce recovery of phrenic nerve activity in hemisected animals in the majority of cases. When CGS-21680 was administered prior to DPCPX in hemisected rats, the magnitude of recovery of respiratory function was significantly greater than that elicited by DPCPX alone. However, when the A2 receptor agonist was administered after DPCPX, the magnitude of recovery was virtually unchanged, whereas activity in the right phrenic nerve was significantly enhanced. The A1 receptor agonist N6-cyclohexyladenosine depressed respiratory activity in non-injured, as well as hemisected, rats. The A2 receptor antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine did not affect respiratory activity. 4. We conclude that while antagonism at central adenosine A1 receptors mediates functional restitution in hemisected animals, activation of A2 receptors located outside of the CNS subserves the A1 receptor-mediated respiratory recovery.     

The adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline induces a monoamine-dependent increase of the anticataleptic effects of NMDA receptor antagonists

Previous work revealed that adenosine antagonists as theophylline reversed neuroleptic-induced catalepsy and potentiated anticataleptic effects of dopamine agonists reflecting specific adenosine-dopamine receptor interactions in the central nervous system. We tested whether similar functional interactions exist between adenosine receptors and glutamate receptors of the N-methyl-D-asparte (NMDA) subtype. The present study demonstrates that the anticataleptic effects of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist CGP37849 and the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine can be potentiated by coadministration of a threshold dose of the adenosine receptor antagonist theophylline (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) in haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.)-pretreated rats. This potentiation was elicited only with higher doses of CGP37849 (4 and 8 mg/kg, i.p.) or dizocilpine (0.16 mg/kg, i.p.) in haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), but not in reserpine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) plus -methyl-ptyrosine (100 mg/kg, i.p.)-pretreated animals. Therefore, these synergistic interactions seem to be brought about by indirect monoamine-dependent mechanisms rather than direct functional interrelationships between NMDA and adenosine A_2a receptors.     

Blockade of adenosine and dopamine receptors inhibits the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol in mice

Rationale Several reports have suggested the involvement of brain adenosine and dopamine receptors in different actions produced by ethanol such as motor incoordination or anxiolytic, hypnotic and reinforcing effects. The co-localization and interaction between adenosine and dopamine receptors in different brain regions has also been well documented. However, few studies have demonstrated the involvement of these mechanisms in the tolerance induced by ethanol. Objectives The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol-induced motor incoordination in mice. Methods In connection with the rota-rod apparatus, the effects of acute administration of the adenosine receptor antagonists caffeine (non-selective), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, adenosine A₁ receptor antagonist) and 4-(2-[7-amino-2-{2-furyl}{1,2,4}triazolo-{2,3-a}{1,3,5}triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM241385, adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist), together with R(+)-7-cloro-8-hidroxi-3-metil-1-fenil-2,3,4,5-tetrahidro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH23390, dopamine D₁ receptor antagonist) and sulpiride (dopamine D₂ receptor antagonist), alone or in combination with ethanol (2.25 g/kg, i.p.), were studied. Twenty-four hours after, all animals were re-tested on the rota-rod after receiving the same dose of ethanol. Results The repeated administration of ethanol promoted a significant reduction of motor impairment on day 2 (i.e. rapid tolerance). This effect was blocked by caffeine (3.0–30.0 mg/kg, i.p.), DPCPX (3.0–6.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or SCH23390 (0.01–0.03 mg/kg, s.c.), but not with ZM241385 (0.5–1.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or sulpiride (1.0–3.0 mg/kg, i.p.). Conclusions Our results suggest that the rapid tolerance to ethanol-induced motor impairment in mice may be modulated by adenosine A₁ receptors and dopamine D₁ receptors.     

Mechanism of inhibitory effect of citalopram on isolated guinea-pig atria in relation to adenosine receptor

The effect of citalopram (CTP), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant was studied on the rate and force of contractions of isolated guinea-pig atria. CTP (2-32 microg/ml) caused a dose-dependent decrease in the contractile force (7%-62%) and in the rate of contractions (11%-72%). These negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of CTP (8 microg/ml) were not prevented by atropine (1 microg/ml) and 3,7 dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX; 1.5 microg/ml), an adenosine A(2) receptor antagonist, but 1,3 dipropargyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX; 12 microg/ml), a specific adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist significantly blocked these effects (p < 0.001) and theophylline (30 microg/ml) a non-selective adenosine A(1)/A(2A) receptor antagonist also prevented the inotropic and chronotropic effects of CTP. These results suggest that the negative inotropic and chronotropic effect of CTP on isolated guinea-pig atria is probably mediated through an inhibition of the uptake of adenosine or the A(1) receptor mechanism.     

Potent adenosine receptor antagonists that are selective for the A1 receptor subtype

The xanthines currently represent the most potent class of adenosine receptor antagonists. However, known derivatives of xanthine show little difference in antagonist potency between the two putative adenosine receptor subtypes, A1 and A2. We conducted a systematic study of xanthine structure-activity relationships that compared antagonist potency at the A1 receptor of adipocytes with potency at the A2 receptor of platelets. Since adenosine receptors are coupled to adenylate cyclase in these tissues, inhibition of adenylate cyclase via A1 receptors and stimulation via A2 receptors were used as models of receptor activation. Antagonist potency was quantitated by Schild analysis, which yields an estimate of affinity (Ki) for the drug-receptor interaction. Ki values of a series of xanthine analogues enabled us to identify structural modifications than enhanced antagonist selectivity for one receptor subtype over the other. We found that changes in the substituent at position 8 of the xanthine nucleus influenced antagonist potency at the A1 adenosine receptor more than at the A2 receptor. In particular, an 8-cyclohexyl or 8-cyclopentyl substituent promoted antagonist selectivity for the A1 receptor subtype. Thus, 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine had comparatively high affinity (Ki = 0.47 +/- 2 nM) at the A1 receptor, and was roughly 150-fold more potent as an antagonist of the A1- than of the A2-adenosine receptor subtype. In addition, the cycloalkylxanthines were relatively ineffective as inhibitors of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases when used at concentrations that produced marked adenosine receptor antagonism.     

Development of spin-labeled probes for adenosine receptors

Functionalized xanthine derivatives bearing a nitroxide moiety at the 3- or 8-position were synthesized as electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) probes. The 8-cyclopentyl-1-propylxanthine derivative 4, spin-labeled at N3 by substitution with a nitroxide-bearing dihydropyrrole moiety, was a potent and selective A(1) adenosine receptor antagonist (K(i) for A(1) 5.5 nM, 1600-fold selectivity vs A(2A), >200-fold vs A(2B), and 310-fold vs A(3) adenosine receptors). 8-(1-Oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine 10 (K(i) for A(1) 8.2 nM) was similarly potent and selective, while 8-(1-oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)-1,3-dipropylxanthine 11 (K(i) for A(1) 160 nM) exhibited significantly lower affinity for A(1) adenosine receptors. 8-[4-(((1-Oxyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-4-yl)amino)-2-oxoethoxy)phenyl]-1-propylxanthine14, a 3-unsubstituted xanthine derivative, was found to be a potent A(2B) adenosine receptor antagonist (K(i) for A(2B) 48 nM) but also exhibited high affinity for A(1) receptors (K(i) for A(1) 15.7 nM). An X-ray structure of compound 10 was obtained, confirming the proposed structure. The novel spin-labeled A(1)-selective or A(1)/A(2B)-nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists may become useful probes for biophysicochemical investigations of adenosine receptors in their membrane environment.