A fully automated [35S]GTPgammaS scintillation proximity assay for the high-throughput screening of Gi-linked G protein-coupled receptors

The diversity of physiological functions mediated by the GPCR superfamily provides a rich source of molecular targets for drug discovery programs. Consequently, a variety of assays have been designed to identify lead molecules based on ligand binding or receptor function. In one of these, the binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS, a nonhydrolyzable analogue of GTP, to receptor-activated G-protein alpha subunits represents a unique functional assay for GPCRs and is well suited for use with automated HTS. Here we compare [(35)S]GTPgammaS scintillation proximity binding assays for two different G(i)-coupled GPCRs, and describe their implementation with automated high-throughput systems.     

A robust and high-capacity [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay for determining antagonist and inverse agonist pharmacological parameters of histamine H(3) receptor ligands

Guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assays were established and utilized as a reliable and high-capacity functional assay for determining antagonist and inverse agonist pharmacological parameters of novel histamine H(3) ligands, at the recombinant human H(3) receptor. [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assays were performed with membranes prepared from human embryonic kidney 293 cells stably expressing the full-length (445 amino acids) human H(3) receptor isoform, at approximately 1 pmol/mg of protein. Utilizing robotic liquid handling, assay filtration, and scintillation counting in a 96-well format, concentration-response curves were determined for up to 40 compounds per assay. The imidazole-containing H(3) receptor antagonist ciproxifan and the non-imidazole antagonist ABT-239 inhibited (R)-alpha-methylhistamine (RAMH)-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in a competitive manner, and negative logarithm of the dissociation equilibrium constant (pK(b)) values determined for nearly 200 structurally diverse H(3) antagonists were very similar to the respective negative logarithm of the equilibrium inhibition constant values from N-alpha-[(3)H]methylhistamine competition binding assays. H(3) antagonists also concentration-dependently decreased basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, thereby displaying inverse agonism at the constitutively active H(3) receptor. At maximally effective concentrations, non-imidazole H(3) antagonists inhibited basal [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding by approximately 20%. For over 100 of these antagonists, negative logarithm of the 50% effective concentration values for inverse agonism were very similar to the respective pK(b) values. Both H(3) receptor agonist-dependent and -independent (constitutive) [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding were sensitive to changes in assay concentrations of sodium, magnesium, and the guanine nucleotide GDP; however, the potency of ABT-239 for inhibition of RAMH-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was not significantly affected. These robust and reliable [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assays have become one of the important tools in our pharmacological analysis and development of novel histamine H(3) receptor antagonists/inverse agonists.     

A 1,536-well [(35)S]GTPgammaS scintillation proximity binding assay for ultra-high-throughput screening of an orphan galphai-coupled GPCR

Members of the superfamily of seven transmembrane receptors, known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are important targets for many therapeutic areas in drug discovery. A homogeneous guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) scintillation proximity assay (SPA) binding assay targeting a Galphai-coupled GPCR recombinantly expressed in membranes of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells was developed and miniaturized into 1,536-well plate format. The primary ultra-high-throughput screen of the entire compound collection was accomplished on the Kalypsys (San Diego, CA) robotic platform at a concentration of 8 muM using the 1,536-well [(35)S]GTPgammaS SPA binding functional assay. The signal-to-noise ratio of the primary screen was approximately 2.1-fold, and the plate coefficient of variation for the compound field was approximately 11%. The hit rate from the primary screen for receptor agonists at >35% activity was approximately 0.3%. Primary hits were cherry-picked, confirmed in triplicate, counterscreened against untransfected CHO cell membranes, and further analyzed in a cyclic AMP functional assay, resulting in 34 leads for optimization.     

Mechanisms of G protein activation via the D2 dopamine receptor: evidence for persistent receptor/G protein interaction after agonist stimulation

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this report is to study mechanisms of G protein activation by agonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The association and dissociation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding at G proteins in membranes of CHO cells stably transfected with the human dopamine D(2short) receptor was studied in the presence of a range of agonists. KEY RESULTS: Binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS was dissociable in the absence of agonist and dissociation was accelerated both in rate and extent by dopamine, an effect which was blocked by the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist raclopride and by suramin, which inhibits receptor/G protein interaction. A range of agonists of varying efficacy increased the rate of dissociation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, with the more efficacious agonists resulting in faster dissociation. Agonists were able to dissociate about 70% of the pre-bound [(35)S]GTPgammaS, leaving a component which may not be accessible to the agonist-bound receptor. The dissociable component of the [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was reduced with longer association times and increased [(35)S]GTPgammaS concentrations. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These data are consistent with [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding being initially to receptor-linked G proteins and then to G proteins which have separated from the agonist bound receptor. Under the conditions used typically for [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assays, therefore, much of the agonist-receptor complex remains in proximity to G proteins after they have been activated by agonist.     

Reciprocal regulation of agonist and inverse agonist signaling efficacy upon short-term treatment of the human delta-opioid receptor with an inverse agonist

Rapid regulation of receptor signaling by agonist ligands is widely accepted, whereas short-term adaptation to inverse agonists has been little documented. In the present study, guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding and cAMP accumulation assays were used to assess the consequences of 30-min exposure to the inverse agonist N,N-diallyl-Tyr-Aib-Aib-Phe-Leu-OH (ICI174864) (1 microM) on delta-opioid receptor signaling efficacy. ICI174864 pretreatment increased maximal effect (E(max)) for the partial agonist Tyr-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-Phe-Phe-OH (TIPP) at the two levels of the signaling cascade, whereas E(max) values for more efficacious agonists like (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC-80) and bremazocine were increased in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding but not in cAMP accumulation assays. Pre-exposure to ICI174864 also induced a shift to the left in dose-response curves for bremazocine and TIPP. On the other hand, E(max) for the inverse agonist H-Tyr-TicPsi[CH(2)NH]Cha-Phe-OH was reduced in both assays, but no changes in potency were observed. For the weaker inverse agonist naloxone, E(max) in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was drastically modified because the drug turned from inverse agonist to agonist after ICI174864 pretreatment. Likewise, ICI174864 turned from inverse agonist to agonist when tested in cAMP accumulation assays. In both cases, inversion of efficacy was concomitant with marked increase in potency for agonist effects. Together with functional changes, short-term treatment with ICI174864 reduced basal receptor phosphorylation and increased immunoreactivity for Galpha(i3) in membrane preparations. Functional consequences of ICI174864 pretreatment were simulated in the cubic ternary complex model by increasing receptor/G protein coupling or G protein amount available for interaction with the receptor. Taken together, these data show that inverse agonists may induce rapid regulation in receptor signaling efficacy.     

Relationship of mu opioid receptor binding to activation of G-proteins in specific rat brain regions

This study investigated the relationship between mu receptor binding and mu agonist activation of G-proteins in the rat brain. To directly compare agonist potencies in receptor binding (K(i) values) and G-protein activation (K(s) values), both agonist-stimulated [(35)S]guanosine-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) and [(3)H]naloxone binding assays were conducted under identical conditions, using the full mu agonist [d-Ala(2), N-Me(4), Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO). DAMGO exhibited biphasic competition of [(3)H]naloxone binding and stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in most regions. Whereas the high-affinity component represented a large percentage (50-80%) of total receptor sites, the high-affinity component of DAMGO-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was much lower, <30% of the total, and in most regions significant stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding did not occur until the high-affinity binding sites were completely occupied. Moreover, the low-affinity potencies for DAMGO in receptor binding and G-protein activation were the same across different regions. Receptor-transducer amplification factors were calculated by the ratio of the apparent B(max) of net agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to the B(max) of receptor binding. Amplification factors for the nine regions examined were relatively high and varied significantly across regions, from a ratio of 8 in the thalamus to 38 in the cortex, suggesting that the efficiency of mu opioid receptor coupling to G-proteins varies across brain regions.     

Structural determinants of opioid activity in the orvinols and related structures: ethers of orvinol and isoorvinol

A series of ethers of orvinol and isoorvinol has been prepared and evaluated in opioid receptor binding and in vitro functional assays. The most striking finding was the very large difference in kappa-opioid receptor activity between the diastereomeric ethyl ethers: 46-fold in binding, 150-fold in GPI, and 900-fold in the [(35)S]GTPgammaS assay in favor of the (R)-diastereomer. Additionally in the (R)-series there was a 700-fold increase in kappa-agonist potency in the [(35)S]GTPgammaS assay when OEt was replaced by OBn. The data can be explained in a triple binding site model: an H-bonding site, a lipophilic site, and an inhibitory site with which the 20-Me group in the (S)-ethers may interact. It appears that kappa-agonist binding of the orvinols avoids the inhibitory site in the intramolecular H-bonded conformation.     

The 'allosteric modulator' SCH-202676 disrupts G protein-coupled receptor function via sulphydryl-sensitive mechanisms

1. Previous studies suggest that the thiadiazole compound SCH-202676 (N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5-(2H)-ylidene)methanamine) acts as an allosteric modulator of a variety of structurally distinct G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It was postulated that SCH-202676 would directly bind a structural motif in the receptor molecule common to divergent members of the GPCR family. The molecular mechanisms of such a promiscuous action, however, remain obscure. 2. To clarify the mechanism of SCH-202676 action, we used the functional approach of [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography with rat brain cryostat sections together with classical membrane [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays to evaluate how the thiadiazole affects G protein activity mediated by various receptors linked to the Gi-family of G proteins. 3. We found that in the absence of dithiotreitol (DTT), SCH-202676 (10(-7)-10(-5) M) elicits nonspecific effects in the [35S]GTPgammaS-based G protein activation assays, thereby severely compromising interpretations on the compounds ability to allosterically inhibit receptor-mediated G protein activity. Such a nonspecific behaviour was fully reversed upon addition of DTT (1 mM), revealing thiol-based mechanism of action. 4. In routine incubations containing DTT, SCH-202676 had no effect on receptor-driven G protein activity, as assessed for adenosine A1, alpha2-adrenergic, cannabinoid CB1, lysophosphatidic acid LPA1, muscarinic M2/M4, purinergic P2Y12 or sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors, suggesting that the thiadiazole does not act as an allosteric modulator of GPCR function. 5. 1H NMR analysis indicated that SCH-202676 underwent structural changes after incubation with the reducing agent DTT or with brain tissue. 6. We conclude that SCH-202676 modulates GPCRs via thiol modification rather than via true allosteric mechanisms.     

The inverse agonist effect of rimonabant on G protein activation is not mediated by the cannabinoid CB1 receptor: evidence from postmortem human brain

Rimonabant (SR141716) was the first potent and selective cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist synthesized. Several data support that rimonabant behaves as an inverse agonist. Moreover, there is evidence suggesting that this inverse agonism may be CB1 receptor-independent. The aim of the present study was to elucidate whether the effect of rimonabant over G protein activation in postmortem human brain is CB1 dependent or independent. [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays and antibody-capture [(35)S]GTPγS scintillation proximity assays (SPA) were performed in human and mice brain. [(3)H]SR141716 binding characteristics were also studied. Rimonabant concentration-dependently decreased basal [(35)S]GTPγS binding to human cortical membranes. This effect did not change in the presence of either the CB1 receptor agonist WIN 55,212-2, the CB1 receptor neutral antagonist O-2050, or the CB1 allosteric modulator Org 27569. [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays performed in CB1 knockout mice brains revealed that rimonabant inhibited the [(35)S]GTPγS binding in the same manner as it did in wild-type mice. The SPA combined with the use of specific antibody-capture of G(α) specific subunits showed that rimonabant produces its inverse agonist effect through G(i3), G(o) and G(z) subtypes. This effect was not inhibited by the CB1 receptor antagonist O-2050. Finally, [(3)H]SR141716 binding assays in human cortical membranes demonstrated that rimonabant recognizes an additional binding site other than the CB1 receptor orthosteric binding site recognized by O-2050. This study provides new data demonstrating that at least the inverse agonist effect observed with >1μM concentrations of rimonabant in [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays is not mediated by the CB1 receptor in human brain.     

Assays for enhanced activity of low efficacy partial agonists at the D(2) dopamine receptor

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low efficacy partial agonists at the D2 dopamine receptor may be useful for treating schizophrenia. In this report we describe a method for assessing the efficacy of these compounds based on stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Agonist efficacy was assessed from [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to membranes of CHO cells expressing D2 dopamine receptors in buffers with and without Na+. Effects of Na+ on receptor/G protein coupling were assessed using agonist/[3H]spiperone competition binding assays. KEY RESULTS: When [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays were performed in buffers containing Na+, some agonists (aripiprazole, AJ-76, UH-232) exhibited very low efficacy whereas other agonists exhibited measurable efficacy. When Na+ was substituted by N-methyl D-glucamine, the efficacy of all agonists increased (relative to that of dopamine) but particularly for aripiprazole, aplindore, AJ-76, (-)-3-PPP and UH-232. In ligand binding assays, substitution of Na+ by N-methyl D-glucamine increased receptor/G protein coupling for some agonists -. aplindore, dopamine and (-)-3-PPP - but for aripiprazole, AJ-76 and UH-232 there was little effect on receptor/G protein coupling. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Substitution of Na+ by NMDG increases sensitivity in [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assays so that very low efficacy agonists were detected clearly. For some agonists the effect seems to be mediated via enhanced receptor/G protein coupling whereas for others the effect is mediated at another point in the G protein activation cycle. AJ-76, aripiprazole and UH-232 seem particularly sensitive to this change in assay conditions. This work provides a new method to discover these very low efficacy agonists.     

Differences in efficacy and Na(+) sensitivity between alpha(2B) and alpha(2D) adrenergic receptors: implications for R and R* states

The ability of Na(+) ions to modulate coupling of alpha(2B)- and alpha(2D)-adrenergic receptors to G proteins was investigated in isolated membranes from transfected PC12 and NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells. The initial rate of epinephrine-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was higher for alpha(2D)-receptors (the rat homolog of the alpha(2A)-receptor) in both cell types, whereas both alpha(2B)- and alpha(2D)-receptor responses were higher in PC12 cell membranes. Pertussis toxin completely blocked agonist-stimulated binding. Graded increases in Na(+) caused a progressive loss of basal GTP binding, indicative of its ability to reduce the level of the active R* state of the receptor. This inhibitory effect of Na(+) was more pronounced in PC12/alpha(2B) than PC12/alpha(2D) membranes. Epinephrine-stimulated GTP binding in PC12/alpha(2B) membranes was also more sensitive to Na(+) inhibition than in PC12/alpha(2D) membranes. In saturation [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding studies, the presence of Na(+) reduced apparent GTP affinity, and its effect was greater in PC12/ alpha(2B) membranes, consistent with a greater reduction in the active R* conformation of the receptor. The higher efficacy of epinephrine at alpha(2D) receptors and their lesser sensitivity to Na(+) are both indicative of a more stable R* state. Together these results suggest that differences in the modulatory influence of Na(+) within a family of G(i)-coupled receptors may reflect differences in the stability of the active R* state.     

Generation and analysis of constitutively active and physically destabilized mutants of the human beta(1)-adrenoceptor

Constitutive activity of wild-type and mutant forms of human beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors was measured by guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assays using fusion proteins between these receptors and G(s)alpha. Constitutive activity of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor is enhanced by mutation of Leu(322). The ability of ligands to suppress receptor instability and produce up-regulation is often associated with constitutively active mutants. Leu(322)Lysbeta(1)-adrenoceptor, but not wild type, was up-regulated by exposure to the beta(1)-adrenoceptor selective blocker betaxolol. More extensive sequence alterations of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor were generated to mimic the initially described constitutively active mutant (CAM) of the beta(2)-adrenoceptor that is up-regulated strongly by betaxolol. Substitution of amino acids 316 to 324 of the beta(1)-adrenoceptor with the equivalent alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor sequence did not result in up-regulation by betaxolol. However, these forms of both beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenoceptors displayed substantial and equivalent constitutive activity. The addition of the Leu(322)Lys mutation into the alpha(1b)-adrenoceptor substituted beta(1)-adrenoceptor to produce the CAMKbeta(1)-adrenoceptor allowed substantially greater levels of up-regulation by betaxolol without enhancement of constitutive [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding. Arg(156)Alabeta(1)-adrenoceptor was up-regulated strongly by betaxolol but displayed lower constitutive activity than did other mutants. Binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to all the fusion proteins was increased substantially by isoprenaline. Despite the ability of betaxolol to cause up-regulation of many mutants, only for the CAMbeta(2)-adrenoceptor-G(s)alpha and CAMKbeta(1)-adrenoceptor-G(s)alpha fusion proteins was the basal binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS decreased by betaxolol. Clear resolution between receptor constitutive activity and ligand suppression of receptor instability can be obtained for mutant beta-adrenoceptors, and potential inverse agonists do not function equally at phenotypically apparently equivalent CAM receptors.     

Use of the GTP��S ([35S]GTP��S and Eu-GTP��S) binding assay for analysis of ligand potency and efficacy at G protein-coupled receptors

In this review I consider assays for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activity based on the binding of labelled analogues of GTPγS ([³⁵S]GTPγS or Eu-GTPγS) to G proteins in tissues (GTPγS binding assays). Such assays provide convenient measures of GPCR activity close to the receptor in the signalling cascade. In order to set up a GTPγS binding assay, the requirements of the assay must be considered. These are tissue source, GTPγS analogue, G protein, GDP, Mg²⁺/Na⁺ ions, saponin, incubation time. The assay, once optimized, can be used to generate concentration/response curves for GPCRs signalling via G_i/o proteins (or to other G proteins with a modified assay) and actions of agonists, inverse agonists and antagonists may, in principle, be assessed. For agonists and inverse agonists, data for the maximal agonist effect, the concentration of ligand giving a half-maximal response and the Hill coefficient may be derived. For antagonists, data for the equilibrium dissociation constant can be obtained. The mechanistic basis of the assay is considered. Although the assay can be used to profile ligands, under the conditions it is used, it may not be measuring the same event that determines GPCR action in cells.     

Aplindore (DAB-452), a high affinity selective dopamine D2 receptor partial agonist

The pharmacology of aplindore (DAB-452) was characterized in CHO-K1 cells stably transfected with the human dopamine D(2) receptor short isoform (CHO-D(2s)) and in a behavioral model for post-synaptic agonism in rats. In [(3)H]-spiperone competition binding studies, aplindore showed high affinity for dopamine D(2) and D(3) receptors and low affinity for the dopamine D(4), serotonin (5-HT)(1A), 5-HT(2) receptors and the alpha1-adrenoceptor. The high potency partial agonist activity of aplindore was demonstrated in [(35)S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-phosphorylation and intracellular calcium flux assay using fluorometric plate reader ([Ca(2+)](i)-FLIPR) format. The [Ca(2+)](i)-FLIPR assay was conducted with CHO-D(2S) receptor cells also stably expressing chimeric G(alphaq/o)-proteins. In all assay modalities, the potencies and intrinsic activities of aplindore were lower than dopamine and higher than aripiprazole. In contrast to the [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and ERK-phosphorylation assays, the [Ca(2+)](i)-FLIPR assay was able to detect the low partial agonist activity of SDZ 208-912. In unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned rats, aplindore induced contralateral turning, which was blocked by the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonist raclopride. The dopamine D(2) receptor selective partial agonist profile of aplindore suggests that it should be effective for the treatment of dopaminergic-based disorders, such as schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease.     

Characterization of dopaminergic compounds at hD2short, hD4.2 and hD4.7 receptors in agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPγS binding assays

Dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists have been extensively characterized in radioligand binding assays; only a limited number of laboratories have characterized them using a functional assay at multiple receptor subtypes. Experiments were designed to assess four agonists and seven antagonists at three cloned human dopamine receptors using agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays in membranes to quantify the initial cellular event following ligand/receptor interaction. In this model there is constitutive G protein activity (agonist-independent [35S]GTPgammaS binding) and potentially constitutive dopamine receptor activity. Thus, discrimination between silent antagonists, partial agonists and inverse agonists is theoretically possible. It was anticipated that distinctions could be made regarding efficacy of the seven receptor antagonists to provide insight regarding the therapeutic use of antipsychotic drugs. In membranes prepared from CHO cells transfected to express high densities of human D2short, D4.2 or D4.7 receptors, the dopamine receptor agonists apomorphine, pergolide, quinelorane and quinpirole produced concentration-dependent increases in agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. At the hD2short receptor, pergolide and apomorphine were essentially equipotent and more potent than quinelorane and quinpirole; all four agonists displayed similar efficacy at this receptor. At the hD4.2 and the hD4.7 receptors apomorphine was the most potent and pergolide the least efficacious of the four drugs. The ability (both potency and efficacy) of clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, spiperone and ziprasidone to block apomorphine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding and alter basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding was also assessed. All of the antagonists inhibited apomorphine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding with potencies (Kb values) similar to and in rank order consistent with their affinities reported in the literature using radioligand binding assays. Additionally, none of the antagonists altered basal, agonist-independent [35S]GTPgammaS binding, thus they behaved as pure, silent antagonists at D2short, D4.2 and D4.7 receptors under our conditions. In summary, the data suggest that therapeutic distinctions between typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs cannot be made based on their function at D2short, D4.2 and D4.7 subtypes of dopamine receptors.     

Cell type-specific differences in the coupling of recombinant mGlu1alpha receptors to endogenous G protein sub-populations

In this study the effects of cell background on the coupling of the type 1alpha metabotropic glutamate (mGlu1alpha) receptor to different G protein sub-populations by recombinant expression of this receptor subtype in baby hamster kidney (BHK) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells have been investigated. Receptor-G protein interactions were assessed using [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding and subsequent Galpha subunit-specific immunoprecipitation. In a CHO cell line (CHO-lac-mGlu1alpha), where mGlu1alpha receptor expression is under inducible control, stimulation of membranes with the mGlu receptor agonist quisqualate resulted in an increase in specific [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to G(q/11)alpha only, whereas in a BHK cell line (BHK-mGlu1alpha) agonist stimulation increased [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to G(q/11)alpha and also to pertussis toxin (PTx)-sensitive G(i/o) proteins (assessed using G(i1/2)alpha- and G(i3/o)alpha-specific antibodies). These data are consistent with our previous observations of dual, antagonistic G(q/11)/G(i/o) regulation of phospholipase C (PLC) in BHK-mGlu1alpha cells, whereas no evidence was found for a G(i/o) modulation of PLC activity in the CHO-lac-mGlu1alpha cell line. PTx pre-treatment of either cell line had no effect on either the magnitude or the concentration-dependency of agonist-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS-G(q/11)alpha binding, excluding the possibility that receptor-G(i/o) uncoupling can unmask an increase in receptor-G(q/11) interaction. mGlu1alpha receptor expression per se had little effect on Galpha protein expression levels in either CHO or BHK cell lines, with the possible exception of a small, but consistent increase in G(o)alpha expression in BHK-mGlu1alpha cells compared to the vector-transfected control cell line (BHK-570). Semi-quantitative assessment of mGlu1alpha receptor immunoreactivity and [(3)H]quisqualate saturation binding analysis demonstrated a ca 10-fold higher mGlu1alpha receptor content in BHK cells. Whether the higher receptor expression level in BHK-mGlu1alpha cells underlies the additional G(i/o) coupling observed in this cell line, or additional factors contribute to the phenomenon are discussed.     

The development of an europium-GTP assay to quantitate chemokine antagonist interactions for CXCR4 and CCR5

Chemokine receptors have been implicated in several disease processes such as acute and chronic inflammation, cancer, and allograft rejection and are therefore targets for drug development. The chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 are of particular interest as they serve as entry cofactors for human immunodeficiency virus. These receptors are members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. In this respect, assessing GPCR activation by GTP binding is an important tool to study the early stage of signal transduction. The assay normally utilizes the non-hydrolysable GTP analogue guanosine 5'-gamma-[35S]thiotriphosphate. In order to avoid the problems involved in working with radioactivity, a new non-radioactive version of the assay was developed using a europium-labeled GTP analogue in which europium-GTP binding can be assayed using time-resolved fluorescence. The assay was optimized for CXCR4 and CCR5 and validated for screening of chemokine antagonists using the small molecule CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 and CCR5 antagonists.     

Receptor reserve analysis of the human alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor using

Here we determine for norepinephrine, (5-bromo-6-(2-imidazolin-2-ylamino)quinoxaline) (UK14,304), 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-6-(2-propenyl)-4H-thiazolo[4,5-d]azepin-2-amine dihydrochloride (BHT-920), (2-[3-hydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-4-t-butylbenzyl]-2-imidazoline) (oxymetazoline), and ((R)-3-Hydroxy-alpha-[(methylamino)methyl]-benzenemethanol hydrochloride) (phenylephrine), affinities using a radiolabeled agonist and antagonist, and potency and efficacy values in membrane [(35)S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTP gamma S) binding and cAMP cellular inhibition assays, in Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1) expressing the human alpha(2c)-adrenoceptor. These cells express a high ratio of receptor to G-protein because each agonist, but not several antagonists, displaced [(3)H]UK14,304 with higher affinity than [(3)H]rauwolscine. The rank order of potency of high affinity K(i) and EC(50) in both functional assays was norepinephrine > or =UK14,304>BHT-920>oxymetazoline>phenylephrine. The receptor reserve of G-protein activation and cAMP responses was measured with the irreversible antagonist, benextramine; K(A) values of norepinephrine or UK14,304 were similar (289, 271 or 150, 163 nM, respectively). A 20-fold greater receptor occupancy was required for agonist-induced half-maximal [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding compared to cAMP inhibition, indicating significant signal amplification in cells. Therefore, the G-protein activation assay is better at distinguishing full and partial agonists.     

Pro(3)]Dyn A(1-11)-NH(2): a dynorphin analogue with high selectivity for the kappa opioid receptor

A proline scan at positions 2 and 3 of the opioid peptide dynorphin A(1-11)-NH(2) led to the discovery of the analogue [Pro(3)]Dyn A(1-11)-NH(2). This analogue possesses high affinity and selectivity for the kappa opioid receptor (K(i)(kappa) = 2.7 nM, K(i) ratio kappa/micro/delta = 1/2110/3260). The gain in selectivity is achieved through an overall reduction of opioid receptor affinity which is most pronounced at micro and delta receptors. The Pro(3) analogue exhibits antagonist properties. Despite its high kappa affinity, [Pro(3)]Dyn A(1-11)-NH(2) is a relatively weak antagonist in both the [(35)S]GTPgammaS assay (IC(50) = 380 nM) and the guinea pig ileum assay (K(e) = 244 nM). Discrepancies between GPI and binding assay have often been ascribed to differential kappa receptor subtypes prevailing in central vs peripheral neurons. Since the [(35)S]GTPgammaS assay uses the same membrane preparations as the binding assay, differential kappa subtypes can be ruled out as an explanation in this case, and the observed behavior rather seems to reflect an intrinsic property of the ligand.     

Agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography: optimization for high sensitivity.

The receptor-stimulated accumulation of [35S]GTPgammaS provides a measure of functional coupling of G proteins with receptors. Sensitivity for autoradiographic visualization of [35S]GTPgammaS binding was improved two- to threefold in rat brain sections by optimizing assay conditions. Non-specific (NSB), basal and agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding were measured, using methadone, 5-carboxamidotryptamine and epinephrine for mu-opiate receptors, 5-HT(1A) receptors and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors. Basal and NSB were low in glycylglycine buffer compared to Tris or HEPES buffers, and agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding was more easily observed. Further optimization using glycylglycine buffer found increased signal-to-noise ratio with inclusion of dithiothrietol, increased [35S]GTPgammaS incubation time (2-4 h) and guanosine 5'-diphosphate (GDP) preincubation (20-30 min), and use of [35S]GTPgammaS at 0.1 nM. Improved sensitivity was due to decreased NSB and basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding and agonist-stimulated binding were similarly affected for each receptor system. The assay conditions described should extend the use of agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS autoradiography to receptors, which produce low levels of [35S]GTPgammaS binding and to the measurement of changes in receptor-G protein coupling.