Differential activation of adenylate cyclase and receptor internalization by novel dopamine D1 receptor agonists

Structurally dissimilar dopamine D(1) receptor agonists were compared with dopamine in their ability to activate adenylate cyclase and to internalize hemagglutinin-tagged human D(1) receptors in a stably transfected human embryonic kidney cell line. Thirteen dopamine D(1) receptor agonists were selected rationally from three different structural classes: rigid fused ring compounds [dihydrexidine, dinapsoline, dinoxyline, apomorphine, and (5aR,11bS)-4,5,5a,6,7,11b-hexahydro-2-propyl-3-thia-5-azacyclopent-1-ena[c]-phenanthrene-9,10-diol (A86929)]; isochromans [(1R,3S)-3-(1'adamantyl)-1-aminomethyl-3,4-dihydo-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyran (A77636) and (1R,3S)-3-phenyl-1-aminomethyl-3,4-dihydo-5,6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyran (A68930)]; and benzazepines [7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF38393), (+/-)-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF77434), 6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF82958), 3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-hydroxy-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-]H-3-benzazepine (SKF83959), R(+)-6-chloro-7,8,-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF82957), and R(+)-6-chloro-7,8,-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF81297)]. The working hypothesis was that some agonists have differential effects on adenylate cyclase versus receptor internalization that could be correlated to the structural class of the agonist. First, the affinity for the hemagglutinin-hD(1) receptor and the intrinsic activity and potency of adenylate cyclase activation were determined for each compound. The internalization time course and internalization efficacy were then determined for each agonist. It was surprising that internalization efficacy was found to be independent of either agonist structural class or affinity. Only agonists that had both high adenylate cyclase functional potency and high intrinsic activity caused internalization. In addition, four agonists from two structural classes were identified that were capable of fully activating adenylate cyclase without eliciting an internalization response. This study provides the first extensive characterization of D(1) receptor internalization in response to structurally diverse agonists and, at least for the D(1) receptor, shows that functional selectivity is not predictable by simple structural examination. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that functional selectivity reflects subtle ligand-induced conformational changes as opposed to simple agonist trafficking among discrete receptor active states.     

Ventral striatal vs. accumbal (shell) mechanisms and non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors in jaw movements.

This study compared the effects of intracerebral injections of the dopamine D(1)-like receptor agents 3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 83959) and [R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH 23390) into the ventrolateral striatum or the shell of the nucleus accumbens on the synergistic induction of jaw movements by intravenous (i.v.) co-administration of [R]-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SK&F 38393) or SK&F 83959 with the dopamine D(2)-like receptor agonist, quinpirole. In the ventrolateral striatum, SCH 23390 and SK&F 83959 each blocked jaw movements induced by i.v. SK&F 38393 with quinpirole, while only SCH 23390 blocked i.v. SK&F 83959 with quinpirole. SCH 23390 was less effective in the accumbens shell than in the ventrolateral striatum, and SK&F 83959 was ineffective to block i.v. SK&F 38393 with quinpirole, while neither SCH 23390 nor SK&F 83959 blocked i.v. SK&F 83959 with quinpirole. As SK&F 83959 inhibits the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase via dopamine D(1A) receptors but acts as an agonist at a putative dopamine D(1)-like receptor site not linked to cyclase, an important role is indicated for non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptor sites as well as dopamine D(1A) receptors in the regulation of jaw movements via dopamine D(1)-like/D(2)-like receptor synergism, particularly in the ventrolateral striatum.     

Prefrontal,accumbal [shell] and ventral striatal mechanisms in jaw movements and non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors

The effect on jaw movements of intracerebral injections of the dopamine D1-like receptor agents SK&F 83959 (3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), SK&F 38393 ([R]-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and of injections of the dopamine D2-like receptor agonist quinpirole into the ventrolateral striatum, accumbens shell or prefrontal cortex were studied. SK&F 38393 and SK&F 83959 injected into the ventrolateral striatum synergised with i.v. quinpirole; in the shell of accumbens, SK&F 38393 evidenced weaker synergism with quinpirole, while SK&F 83959 did not synergise with it; neither agent synergised with quinpirole in the prefrontal cortex. Co-injection of SCH 23390 or SK&F 83959 into the prefrontal cortex antagonised jaw movements induced by injection of SK&F 83959 into the ventrolateral striatum in combination with i.v. quinpirole. Injection of SK&F 83959 + quinpirole into the ventrolateral striatum, but not into the accumbens shell, resulted in synergism. These findings indicate a primary, but not exclusive, role for ventral striatal, non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors in the induction of jaw movements. These processes appear to require tonic activity of prefrontal cyclase-linked dopamine D1A [and/or D1B] receptors.     

Topographical resolution of jaw movements mediated by cyclase- vs. non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors: studies with SK&F 83822

This study examined the effects on orofacial movement topography of SK&F 83822 ([R/S]-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-[3-methylphenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), which stimulates dopamine D(1)-like receptors coupled to stimulation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) but not phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, in comparison with SK&F 83959 ([R/S]-3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine), which stimulates PI hydrolysis but not AC. SK&F 83822 alone induced chattering, while SK&F 83959 alone exerted little effect. SK&F 83822 and SK&F 83959 each in combination with the dopamine D(2)-like agonist quinpirole resulted in synergistic induction of non-chattering movements with tongue protrusions. These effects were blocked by the dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine). However, the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 (cis-N-[1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl]-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide) exerted a biphasic effect on synergism with SK&F 83822: chattering was initially released but antagonised thereafter. Only antagonism was seen for synergism with SK&F 83959. While both AC- and PI-coupled dopamine D(1)-like receptors participate in synergistic dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like receptor interactions, topographically specific synergistic and oppositional dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like interactions evident with SK&F 83822 reflect the involvement primarily of D(1)-like receptors coupled to AC rather than PI.     

Characterisation of Gs activation by dopamine D1 receptors using an antibody capture assay: antagonist properties of clozapine

Herein, we examined the direct coupling of human dopamine D1 receptors to G(s) proteins using an antibody capture assay together with a detection technique employing scintillation proximity assay beads. Using a specific antibody, dopamine (DA) and the selective dopamine D1 receptor agonists, 6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF81297) and 3-allyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF82958), behaved as high-efficacy agonists ( approximately 100%) in stimulating guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding to G(s) in L-cells, whereas 2,3,4,5,-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF38393) displayed partial agonist properties (70%). The action of dopamine was specifically mediated by human dopamine D1 receptors inasmuch as the selective human dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, (R)-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-benzazepine-7-ol (SCH23390), blocked dopamine-induced [35S]GTP gamma S binding to G(s) with a pK(B) (9.29) close to its pK(i) (9.33). The antipsychotic agents, clozapine and haloperidol, displayed no intrinsic activity when tested alone and inhibited dopamine-stimulated G(s) activation with pK(B)'s of 6.7 and 7.3, respectively, values close to their pK(i) values at these sites. In conclusion, the use of an anti-G(s) protein immunoprecipitation assay coupled to scintillation proximity assays allows direct evaluation of the functional activity of dopamine D1 receptors ligands at the G protein level. Employing this novel technique, the typical and atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and haloperidol, respectively, both exhibited antagonist properties at dopamine D1 receptors.     

Topographical assessment and pharmacological characterization of orofacial movements in mice: dopamine D(1)-like vs. D(2)-like receptor regulation

A novel procedure for the assessment of orofacial movement topographies in mice was used to study, for the first time, the individual and interactive involvement of dopamine D(1)-like vs. D(2)-like receptors in their regulation. The dopamine D(1)-like receptor agonists A 68930 ([1R,3S]-1-aminomethyl-5,6-dihydroxy-3-phenyl-isochroman) and SK&F 83959 (3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) each induced vertical jaw movements with tongue protrusions and incisor chattering. The dopamine D(1)-like receptor antagonists SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine) and BW 737C ([S]-6-chloro-1-[2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylbenzyl]-7-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline) antagonised these responses, while the dopamine D(2)-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 (cis-N-[1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl]-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide) attenuated those to SK&F 83959 and released horizontal jaw movements. These findings suggest some role for a dopamine D(1)-like receptor that is coupled to a transduction system other than/additional to adenylyl cyclase, and for dopamine D(1)-like:D(2)-like receptor interactions, in the regulation of individual orofacial movement topographies in the mouse. This methodology will allow the use of knockout mice to clarify the roles of individual dopamine receptor subtypes in their regulation.     

Up-regulated dopamine D1 receptor binding can be detected in vivo following repeated SCH 23390, but not SKF 81297 or 6-hydroxydopamine,treatments

Three different pharmacological treatments, previously shown to cause dopamine D1 receptor supersensitivity in rats, were studied for changes in the binding of R-(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SCH 23390) labeled with carbon-11. Rats treated subchronically with the full dopamine D1 receptor agonist R/S-(+/-)-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine (SKF 81297) showed no significant difference in dopamine D1 receptor binding. Similarly, unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning, followed by apomorphine screening for contralateral rotation, failed to cause significant differences in the rat brain distribution of [11C]SCH 23390 in the lesioned versus the nonlesioned striatal sides. In contrast, repeated exposure with the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH 23390 significantly enhanced the uptake of [11C]SCH 23390 in the dopamine D1 receptor-rich striatum and olfactory tubercles. These results demonstrate that [11C]SCH 23390 can significantly detect enhanced binding in rat brain regions expected to have up-regulated dopamine D1 receptors. The failure of [11C]SCH 23390 to reveal any differences after subchronic agonist or 6-hydroxydopamine treatments suggests that the behavioural supersensitization induced by these treatments is possibly due to changes to the high-affinity state or to components downstream of dopamine D1 receptors in the signal transduction pathway. The present study has implications for studies imaging dopamine D1 receptors in neuropsychiatric disorders with abnormal dopamine stimulation using positron emission tomography.     

SK&F 83822 distinguishes adenylyl cyclase from phospholipase C-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors: behavioural topography

Effects of SK&F 83822 [3-allyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-(3-methylphenyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine], an agonist at dopamine D1-like receptors which stimulate adenylyl cyclase but not phosphoinositide hydrolysis, were studied topographically so as to clarify differences between these receptors in the regulation of behaviour. Using cloned receptors, SK&F 83822 showed high, selective affinity for dopamine D1 and D5 over D2, D3, D4 and several non-dopamine receptors. SK&F 83822 induced little intense grooming, but readily induced sniffing, locomotion and rearing; seizures were evident at higher doses, characterised by tonic convulsions, forepaw myoclonus and explosive hyperlocomotion. The dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 [R(+)-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine] readily antagonised these responses to SK&F 83822, particularly seizure activity. The dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 [cis-N-(1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-methylaminobenzamide] did not alleviate seizures induced by SK&F 83822; YM 09151-02 did, however, attenuate SK&F 83822-induced sniffing, locomotion and rearing, and released vacuous chewing. These findings indicate that dopamine D1-like receptors linked to adenylyl cyclase can be differentiated from those not linked to adenylyl cyclase in terms of their roles in the topographical regulation of behaviour. For example, the seizure and vacuous chewing responses appear to involve dopamine D1-like receptors that stimulate adenylyl cyclase, while intense grooming involves those which do not.     

Motor effects of (-)-OSU6162 in primates with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions

The effects of the novel compound, (-)-OSU6162 ((S)-(-)-3-methylsulfonylphenyl-1-propylpiperidine), on rotational behavior induced by dopamine receptor agonists was investigated in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) with unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. (-)-OSU6162 per se displayed no effect on the animals' behavior. On the other hand, pretreatment with (-)-OSU6162 attenuated rotational behavior induced by apomorphine (apomorphini hydrochloridum), L-DOPA (3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine), and the dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinpirole (trans-(-)-4aR-4,4a, 5,6,7,8,8a,9-octahydro-5-propyl-1H-pyrazolol[3,4-g]quinoline hydrochloride), without inducing motor impairment such as akinesia or dystonia. In addition, treatment with (-)-OSU6162 for 5 consecutive days almost completely abolished the rotational behavior provoked by apomorphine and produced a transient subsensitization of such apomorphine-induced effects after it was discontinued. Moreover, pretreatment with (-)-OSU6162 in two monkeys augmented the rotational behavior elicited by the dopamine D1 receptor agonists, SKF-81297 (R(+)-6-chloro-7,8,dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide) and A-77636 ((-)-(1R, 3S)-3-adamantyl-1-(aminomethyl)-3,4-dihydro-5, 6-dihydroxy-1H-2-benzopyran hydrochloride). The findings indicate that (-)-OSU6162 can exert indirect state-dependent effects that differentially affect dopamine D1 and dopamine D2 receptor agonist-induced behavior.     

Catalepsy-associated behavior induced by dopamine D1 receptor antagonists and partial dopamine D1 receptor agonists in squirrel monkeys

Observational procedures were used to compare the behavioral effects of dopamine D₁ receptor antagonists and partial dopamine D₁ receptor agonists in squirrel monkeys. The dopamine D₁ receptor antagonists SCH 39166 ((−)-tran-6- 7,7a,8,9,13b-hexahydro-3-chloro-2-hydroxy-N-methyl-5H-benzo(d)naphtho-(2,1-b)azepine) and BW 737C89 ([S]-6-chloro-1[2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylbenzyl]- hydroxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline) produced dose-related increases in the duration of static and unusual postures, indicative of catalepsy. R-SKF 38393 (R(+)-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-[1H]-3-benzazepine) and SKF 75670 (7,8-dihydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-[1H]-3-benzazepine), which are considered partial dopamine D₁ receptor agonists, also consistently produced dose-related increases in catalepsy-associated behavior and had effects comparable in magnitude to those of dopamine D₁ receptor antagonists. In contrast, the higher efficacy D₁ agonists SKF 81297 (6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-[1H]-3-benzazepine) and SKF 82958 (6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-3-allylp-[1H]-3-benzazepine) did not produce catalepsy-associated behavior at any dose tested. The results indicate that dopamine D₁ agonists differ with respect to cataleptogenic activity, possibly reflecting differences in intrinsic activity.     

Dopamine receptors in human platelets

The expression of dopamine receptors by human platelets was investigated by Western blot analysis and immunocytochemical techniques using antibodies raised against dopamine D1-D5 receptor protein. The influence of dopamine D1-like and D2-like receptor agonists on adrenaline-induced platelet aggregation was also investigated. Western blot analysis revealed that platelet membranes bind anti-dopamine D3 or D5 receptor protein antibodies, but not anti-D1, D2 or D4 receptor protein antibodies. Cytospin centrifuged human platelets exposed to anti-dopamine D3 or D5 receptor protein antibodies developed a specific immune staining, whereas no positive staining was noticeable in platelets exposed to other antibodies tested. Both the D1-like receptor agonist 1-phenyl2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-(1H)-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride (SKF 38393) and the D2-like receptor agonist 7-hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin (7-OH-DPAT) dose-dependently inhibited adrenaline-induced platelet aggregation. These effects were decreased respectively by the D-like and D2-like receptor antagonists R(+)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol hydrochloride (SCH 23390) and (-)sulpiride. The above findings indicate that human platelets express dopamine D3 and D5 receptors probably involved in the regulation of platelet function.     

SK&F 83959 and non-cyclase-coupled dopamine D1-like receptors in jaw movements via dopamine D1-like/D2-like receptor synergism

This study compared the effects of the dopamine D1-like receptor agents SK&F 83959 (3-methyl-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-[3-methyl-phenyl]-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro- 1 H-3-benzazepine), which inhibits the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase, and A 68930 ([1R,3S]-1-aminomethyl-5,6-dihydroxy-3-phenyl-isochroman), a full efficacy agonist, in regulating jaw movements in the rat by synergism with dopamine D2-like receptor agonism. When SK&F 83959 and A 68930 were given in combination with quinpirole, there was a synergistic induction of jaw movements. Responsivity to SK&F 83959 + quinpirole was antagonised by the dopamine D1-like receptor antagonists SCH 23390 ([R]-3-methyl-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-ben zaz epine) and BW 737C ([S]-6-chloro-1-[2,5-dimethoxy-4-propylbenzyl]-7-hydroxy-2-methyl- 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline); synergism was antagonised also by the dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist YM 09151-2 (cis-N-[1-benzyl-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl]-5-chloro-2-methoxy-4-++ +methyl-aminobenzamide). Responsivity to A 68930 + quinpirole was enhanced by low doses of SCH 23390, BW 737C and YM 09151-2, and antagonised by higher doses of SCH 23390 and YM 09151-2. These results implicate a novel, dopamine D1-like receptor that is coupled to a transduction system other than/additional to adenylyl cyclase, and suggest that its functional role extends to the regulation of jaw movements by synergistic interactions with dopamine D2-like receptors.     

Muscarinic M4 receptor inhibition of dopamine D1-like receptor signalling in rat nucleus accumbens

Several studies have indicated the occurrence of an antagonistic interaction between muscarinic and dopamine D1-like receptors in the ventral striatum, but the subtype(s) of muscarinic receptor involved has not been characterized. We show that in membranes of rat nucleus accumbens, carbachol inhibited the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity by dopamine and the dopamine D1-like receptor agonist (+/-)-6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-3-allyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine without affecting the binding properties of dopamine to dopamine D1-like receptors. The carbachol inhibition was competitively counteracted by receptor antagonists with a rank order of potency typical of the involvement of the muscarinic M(4) receptor subtype. Moreover, muscarinic toxin 3, a selective muscarinic M(4) receptor antagonist, completely blocked the carbachol inhibition, whereas muscarinic toxin 7, a selective muscarinic M(1) receptor antagonist, had no effect. The muscarinic inhibition occurred to a similar extent in the core and shell regions. These data demonstrate that in nucleus accumbens, muscarinic M(4) receptors exert a direct inhibitory control on dopamine D1-like receptor signalling.     

Endomorphins 1 and 2 induce amnesia via selective modulation of dopamine receptors in mice

The involvement of dopamine receptors in the amnesic effects of the endogenous micro-opioid receptor agonists endomorphins 1 and 2 was investigated by observing step-down type passive avoidance learning in mice. Although the dopamine D1 receptor agonist R(+)-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine-7,8-diol hydrochloride (R(+)-SKF38393) (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (R(+)-SCH23390) (2.5 and 5 microg/kg) or the dopamine D2 receptor agonist N-n-phenethyl-N-propylethyl-p-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-ethylamine (RU24213) (0.3 and 1 mg/kg) had no significant effects on the endomorphin-1 (10 microg)- or endomorphin-2 (10 microg)-induced decrease in step-down latency of passive avoidance learning, (-)-sulpiride (10 mg/kg), a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, significantly reversed the decrease in step-down latency evoked by endomorphin-2 (10 microg), but not by endomorphin-1 (10 microg). Taken together, it is likely that stimulation of dopamine D2 receptors results in the endomorphin-2-but not endomorphin-1-induced impairment of passive avoidance learning.     

The effects of dopamine receptor agents on naloxone-induced jumping behaviour in morphine-dependent mice

In the present study, the effects of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists on naloxone-induced jumping in morphine-dependent mice were examined. Mice were rendered dependent as described in the methods section. Naloxone was injected to elicit jumping (as withdrawal sign). The first group received dopamine receptor drugs before naloxone injection to test the effects of the drugs on the expression of jumping. Administration of the dopamine D1/D2 receptor agonist, apomorphine (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/kg), decreased jumping, but not diarrhoea, induced by naloxone. The effect of apomorphine on jumping was reduced by the dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride. The dopamine D2 receptor agonist, quinpirole (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg), increased jumping, while it decreased diarrhoea in mice. Different doses of sulpiride did not alter jumping, but one dose of the drug (12.5 mg/kg) decreased jumping. Neither the dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF38393 (1-phenyl-7,8-dihydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride; 8 and 16 mg/kg), nor the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH23390 (R-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-benzazepine-7-ol maleate; 5, 10 and 25 mg/kg), altered jumping, but they decreased diarrhoea. The second group of animals received the drugs during the development of dependence. Administration of quinpirole (0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 mg/kg), but not bromocriptine (4, 8 and 16 mg/kg), apomorphine (0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg) or sulpiride (12.5, 25 and 50 mg/kg) decreased naloxone-induced jumping and diarrhoea. A dose of SKF38393 (8 mg/kg) decreased jumping, while both SKF38393 (4 and 16 mg/kg) and SCH23390 (5 and 10 microg/kg) increased diarrhoea. It is concluded that activation of both dopamine D1 and D2 receptors may suppress naloxone-induced jumping in morphine-dependent mice, and that stimulation of dopamine D1 receptors during development of morphine dependence may increase diarrhoea through peripheral mechanism.     

(+/-)-3-Allyl-6-bromo-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3- benzazepin, a new high-affinity D1 dopamine receptor ligand: synthesis and structure-activity relationship.

The 7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepines form a series of compounds having a high affinity at the D1 dopamine receptor. The 6-chloro derivative has been previously shown to have enhanced affinity, selectivity, and agonist activity. In an attempt to study the effect of substitution of a 6-bromo group in place of the 6-chloro, we have synthesized a series of compounds and evaluated them for their affinity for the D1 receptor. The results show that the 6-bromo derivatives have virtually identical affinities to their 6-chloro counterparts, a finding similar to that found in the D1 antagonist 7-halo-8-hydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine series. From the present work, 3-allyl-6-bromo-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepi ne (6-Br-APB) has been identified as a suitable candidate for further in vivo studies and resolution into its active and inactive enantiomers.     

Vasodilator response to dopamine in the ferret pulmonary circulation.

1. The isolated perfused lung of the ferret was used to study the effects of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists. Under constant flow, a fall in pulmonary artery pressure reflects a vasodilator response. Since tone is normally low, agonists were given during hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction to enable detection of dilator responses. 2. Vasodilator responses were produced by bolus doses of dopamine over the range 0.1 to 5.0 micrograms kg-1, and by the selective DA1 agonist SK&F 38393 (1-phenyl-7,8-dihydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride). 3. The dopamine response was blocked by low doses of the selective DA1-antagonist SCH23390 (R-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine-7- ol maleate), and by sulpiride. 4. The vasodilator response to the relatively selective DA2-agonist N,N-di-n-propyl dopamine occurred only at high dose and was incompletely blocked by the selective DA2 antagonist domperidone at a cumulative dose of 10 mg kg-1. 5. Thus dopamine receptors of the DA1 type may mediate vasodilatation in the ferret pulmonary circulation, but no evidence was obtained for the existence of DA2-receptors.     

Dopaminergic modulation of rat pup ultrasonic vocalizations.

The dopamine D(1) receptor agonist, R(+)-6-chloro-7, 8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide (SKF 81297), the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist, trans-(-)-4aR-4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a,9-octahydro-5-propyl-1H-pyrazolo[3, 4-g]quinoline hydrochloride (quinpirole), and the dopamine D(3) receptor agonist, (+/-)-7-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin hydrobromide (7-OH-DPAT) all reduced the frequency of isolation-induced infant rat ultrasonic vocalizations and lowered body temperature when compared to saline-injected controls. Ultrasonic vocalization rate was not affected by either the dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist, R(+)-2,3,4, 5-tetrahydro-8-iodo-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol hydrochloride (SCH 23390) or the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor antagonist, S(-)-raclopride-L-tartrate (raclopride) when given alone, nor did these antagonists block the ultrasonic vocalization reductions caused by the dopamine D(1) receptor agonist or the dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor agonist. The dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor antagonist but not the dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist blocked the dopamine D(3) receptor agonist's ultrasonic vocalization reduction. SKF 81297 reduced general activity while quinpirole and 7-OH-DPAT increased activity. Raclopride reversed quinpirole's reduction in body temperature, as well as 7-OH-DPAT's effects on body temperature, ultrasonic vocalizations, and activity. These results indicate that dopamine D(1), D(2)/D(3), and D(3) receptor agonists all reduce ultrasonic vocalizations by as yet undetermined mechanisms.     

Effects of dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists at peripheral neuronal and vascular dopamine receptors in the anaesthetised dog

The interactions between several putative dopamine receptor agonists and antagonists have been examined at neuronal and vascular dopamine receptors in the femoral and mesenteric vascular beds, respectively, of anaesthetised dogs. N,N-di-n- propyldopamine (DPDA) and apomorphine caused vasodilatation in both vascular beds. Cis alpha-flupenthixol, fluphenazine, and sulpiride were much more potent at antagonising DPDA at neuronal than at vascular dopamine receptors. Fluphenazine and sulpiride were as potent against apomorphine as against DPDA at neuronal receptors, but cis alpha-flupenthixol was much less effective. Fluphenazine antagonised the vasodilator effect of apomorphine in the mesenteric vascular bed, but cis alpha-flupenthixol and sulpiride did not, even when used in doses much larger than were effective against DPDA. Further experiments, in dogs pretreated with phenoxybenzamine and propranolol, revealed that cis alpha-flupenthixol, fluphenazine, and sulpiride also antagonised the mesenteric vasodilator effects of dopamine, 2-amino-5,6-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, 2-amino-6,7-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, and 2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine, suggesting a common site of action of these drugs and DPDA. Only fluphenazine antagonised responses to apomorphine. The results support the view that neuronal and vascular dopamine receptors in the dog are different. They also show that apomorphine stimulates different receptors from DPDA in the mesenteric vascular bed and, perhaps, in the femoral vascular bed as well.     

Dopamine D4 receptors inhibit depolarization-induced [3H]GABA release in the rat subthalamic nucleus

We explored the role of dopamine D4 receptors on [3H]GABA release in the subthalamic nucleus. [3H]GABA release was evoked by high K+ in slices of the nucleus. The selective dopamine D4 receptor agonist PD168,077 (N-[[4-(2-cyanophenyl)-1-piperazynil]methyl]-3-methyl-benzamide) inhibited GABA release with greater potency (EC50=3.2 nM) than quinpirole (EC50=200 nM). SKF 21297 (6-chloro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrobromide), a dopamine D1-like receptor agonist, had no effect. L-745,870 (3-[[4-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl]-1-1H-pyrollo[2,3-b] pyridine), a selective dopamine D4 receptor antagonist, reverted the quinpirole inhibition with greater potency (IC50=8.7 nM) than that of the dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist sulpiride and raclopride (IC50=4804 and 788 nM, respectively). Both methylphenidate and methamphetamine, dopamine reuptake blockers, inhibited by 30% high K(+)-evoked GABA release; the inhibition was blocked by L-745,870. These results show that dopamine D4 receptors modulate GABA release in the subthalamic nucleus. The results would explain how agents that increase interstitial dopamine like methylphenidate and amphethamine might control locomotor hyperactivity seen in disorders of dopamine D4 receptors.