Elastic scattering spectroscopy for the diagnosis of colonic lesions: initial results of a novel optical biopsy technique

BACKGROUND: Biopsy and polypectomy frequently are performed for lesions that carry a low risk of malignant transformation in the colon. Elastic scattering spectroscopy (ESS) is a novel optical biopsy technique that can distinguish, almost instantaneously, between normal and abnormal tissue in vivo, without the need to remove tissue. We assessed the diagnostic potential of ESS in the colon to differentiate normal colonic mucosa, chronic colitis, hyperplastic polyps, adenomatous polyps (with dysplasia), and adenocarcinoma. METHODS: ESS spectra were obtained from 138 sites in 45 patients at colonoscopy. They were then compared with conventional biopsy specimens taken from the same site, including normal colonic mucosa, hyperplastic polyps, adenomatous polyps, chronic colitis, and colon cancer. Spectral analysis was carried out with a validated computerized model that used principal component analysis followed by linear discriminant analysis. Cross validation was carried out by using 60% of the data as a "training set" and the remaining 40% of the data as a "test set." RESULTS: A total of 483 spectra were analyzed (290 normal, 19 hyperplastic, 69 adenomatous polyps, 74 chronic colitis, and 31 colorectal cancer). The sensitivity and the specificity of differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic polyps was 84% and 84%, respectively; for cancer from adenomatous polyps, 80% and 75%, respectively; for colitis from normal tissue, 77% and 82%, respectively; and for dysplastic mucosa (from polyps) from colitis, 85% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ESS holds promise for differentiating colonic lesions with good accuracy and, therefore, is a potentially useful tool to make an instantaneous diagnosis during colonoscopy. It could prove a valuable aid for targeting biopsies in dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease and for deciding which small polyps should be removed.     

Accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy in prediction of histologic findings in diminutive lesions of the rectosigmoid

BACKGROUND: The ability to differentiate adenomatous from nonadenomatous colonic polyps by using chromoendoscopy would obviate the need to remove hyperplastic lesions. The aim of this study was to define the accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy for the determination of colonic polyp histology. METHODS: In 158 patients, 273 polyps (<5 mm) in the rectosigmoid were estimated for their histology. The endoscopists, in two steps, predicted the histopathology of each lesion on the basis of its surface characteristics by using high-resolution colonoscope without any staining and after indigo carmine dye according to the Kudo classification. RESULTS: The resected polyps included 48 adenomatous and 225 nonadenomatous polyps. When histologically confirmed hyperplastic polyps were compared with adenomatous polyps, the prediction of hyperplastic polyps based on endoscopic findings had a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 60%, and an overall accuracy of 81%. The corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy after indigo carmine dye were 94%, 64%, and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the chromoendoscopy only marginally improves the determination between hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps when using high-resolution colonoscopes. The overall accuracy rate increased after dyeing, from 81% to 83%. The omission of histopathologic analysis cannot yet be achieved by chromoendoscopy.     

共聚焦激光显微内镜对结直肠腺瘤性息肉的诊断价值

目的 通过共聚焦激光显微内镜(CLE)分析结直肠息肉的镜下组织学特点,制定相应的诊断依据,探讨CLE诊断结直肠腺瘤性息肉和非腺瘤性息肉的价值.方法 2009年6月至12月间共计90例患者纳入本研究,其中包括已被病理证实为结直肠息肉的40例患者(48个结直肠息肉)和前瞻性研究的50例患者(106个结直肠息肉).同时选取10处正常黏膜作为对比.首先对48个经病理证实为结直肠息肉的病变(腺瘤性息肉22个,非腺瘤性息肉26个)进行CLE图像分析,制定CLE下鉴别腺瘤性息肉和非腺瘤性息肉的诊断依据.然后应用该依据对106个结直肠息肉进行前瞻性CLE诊断,最终将CLE诊断结果与病理诊断结果作比较,评价CLE的诊断效率.结果 在48个经病理证实为结直肠息肉中腺瘤性息肉22个,非腺瘤性息肉26个.CLE诊断腺瘤性息肉的敏感度94.0%、特异度92.9%、准确率93.4%、阳性预测值92.2%,阴性预测值94.5%;CLE诊断非腺瘤性息肉的敏感度92.9%、特异度94%、准确率93.4%、阳性预测值94.5%,阴性预测值92.2%.CLE与组织病理在诊断结直肠腺瘤性息肉时的一致性较好(Kappa=0.893).结论 CLE在结直肠腺瘤性息肉和非腺瘤性息肉的鉴别诊断中精度较高,与组织病理学诊断具有较好的一致性,为进一步及时发现结直肠癌前病变提供了经验基础.     

Importance of the surrounding colonic mucosa in distinguishing between hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps during acetic acid chromoendoscopy

AIM： To examine the characteristics of colonic polyps, where it is difficult to distinguish adenomatous polyps from hyperplastic polyps, with the aid of acetic acid chromoendoscopy. METHODS： Acetic acid spray was applied to colonic polyps smaller than 10 mm before complete excision. Endoscopic images were taken before and 15-30 s after the acetic acid spray. Both pre- and post-sprayed images were shown to 16 examiners, who were asked to interpret the lesions as either hyperplastic or adenomatous polyps. Regression analysis was performed to determine which factors were most likely related to diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS： In 50 cases tested by the 16 examiners, the overall accuracy was 62.4% （499/800）. Regression analysis demonstrated that surrounding colonic mucosa was the only factor that was significantly related to accuracy in discriminating adenomatous from hyperplastic polyps （P 〈 0.001）. Accuracy was higher for polyps with linear surrounding colonic mucosa than for those with nodular surrounding colonic mucosa （P 〈 0.001）, but was not related to the shape, location, or size of the polyp. CONCLUSION： The accuracy of predicting histology is significantly related to the pattern of colonic mucosa surrounding the polyp. Making a histological diagnosis of colon polyps merely by acetic acid spray is helpful for colon polyps with linear, regularly patterned surrounding colonic mucosa, and less so for those with nodular, irregularly patterned surrounding colonic mucosa.     

Step section histology of proximal colon polyps that appear hyperplastic by endoscopy

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have identified a group of polyps, usually located in the proximal colon, with distinct endoscopic features that predict hyperplastic histology. These polyps may occasionally have foci of dysplastic (adenomatous) tissue. We aimed to define the prevalence of adenomatous foci in these polyps. METHODS: Fifty-one consecutive hyperplastic-appearing proximal colon polyps were sectioned at 1-mm intervals for histological analysis. RESULTS: All 51 polyps were hyperplastic, but two (4%) had foci of adenomatous tissue. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of adenomatous foci in proximal colon polyps with endoscopic features of hyperplastic polyps is low. Whether endoscopic resection of polyps with these features is warranted remains uncertain.     

Multiple Large Hyperplastic Polyps of the Colon Coincident with Adenocarcinoma

Diminutive hyperplastic polyps are the most common non-neoplastic lesions of the colon. Typically, they are small (<0.5 cm) sessile lesions, lack cellular atypia, and are found predominantly in the rectosigmoid region of the colon. Multiple large hyperplastic polyps (>1 cm) are rare. Although the relationship between diminutive hyperplastic polyps and adenomatous polyps or carcinoma is controversial, even less data are available on the significance of large hyperplastic polyps. We report the case of a 56-yr-old man who was seen because of fatigue, anemia, and Hemoccult-positive stool. On air contrast barium enema study and colonoscopy, multiple polyps that were similar in appearance were found distributed symmetrically throughout the colon. However, histologic examination revealed 16 hyperplastic polyps 1–2 cm in size, multiple diminutive hyperplastic polyps, one adenomatous polyp, and one adenomatous polyp containing well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. Because multiple large hyperplastic polyps are rare, we suspect this entity may be distinct from diminutive hyperplastic polyps. In our patient, large hyperplastic polyps were distributed symmetrically throughout the colon and were associated with a synchronous carcinoma. Because large hyperplastic polyps may be coincident with adenomatous polyps and carcinoma of the colon, we recommend that patients found to have large hyperplastic polyps undergo removal of all polyps for histologic study.     

Physician accuracy in diagnosing colorectal polyps

Since the medical management of persons with adenomatous colorectal polyps differs from that of those with hyperplastic polyps, accuracy of diagnosis is essential. Although many physicians have grown confident that their skills of visual diagnosis are adequate, few data exist to support this confidence. In order to examine the accuracy of physicians' judgments regarding colorectal polyp histology, the visual diagnosis of physicians experienced in endoscopy was compared with the histologic report. Eighty-one polyps were discovered by flexible sigmoidoscopy among 718 participants in a colon cancer screening program. Eighty percent of all polyps were detected accurately. The diagnostic sensitivity of detecting adenomas was 69 percent, while specificity (accurate diagnosis of hyperplastic polyps) was 86 percent, and there were an additional eight false negative and eight false positive diagnoses. Further analyses revealed that there are individual patterns of diagnostic mistakes made by physicians and that mistakes frequently are related to polyp size. These findings are particularly important in light of the expanding numbers of relatively inexperienced primary care providers performing flexible sigmoidoscopy whose diagnoses may be strongly dependent on polyp size. This research was done through, and supported by, the Center for Occupational Health, Department of Family Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.     

Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001

AIM: To evaluate how proximal colon polyps interpreted as hyperplastic polyps in 2001 would be interpreted by expert pathologists in 2007. METHODS: Forty consecutive proximal colon polyps ≥ 5 mm in size, removed in 2001, and originally interpreted as hyperplastic polyps by general pathologists at Indiana University, were reviewed in 2007 by 3 GI pathologists. RESULTS: The gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists interpreted 85%, 43% and 30% of the polyps as sessile serrated polyps (sessile serrated adenomas). The overall Kappa was 0.16. When diagnoses were compared in pairs, Kappa values were 0.38 and 0.25 (fair agreement) and 0.14 (slight agreement). CONCLUSION: Many polyps interpreted as hyperplastic in 2001 were considered sessile serrated lesions by GI pathologists in 2007, but there is substantial inter-observer variation amongst GI pathologists.     

Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001

AIM： To evaluate how proximal colon polyps interpreted as hyperplastic polyps in 2001 would be interpreted by expert pathologists in 2007.
METHODS： ≥ 5 mm in interpreted pathologists 2007 by 3 GI Forty consecutive proximal colon polyps size, removed in 2001, and originally as hyperplastic polyps by general at Indiana University, were reviewed in pathologists.
CONCLUSION： Many polyps interpreted as hyperplastic in 2001 were considered sessile serrated lesions by GI pathologists in 2007, but there is substantial inter-observer variation amongst GI pathologists.     

Can optical diagnosis of small colon polyps be accurate? Comparing standard scope without narrow banding to high definition scope with narrow banding

AIM: To study the accuracy of using high definition(HD) scope with narrow band imaging(NBI) vs standard white light colonoscope without NBI(ST), to predict the histology of the colon polyps, particularly those 1 cm.METHODS: A total of 147 African Americans patients who were referred to Howard University Hospital for screening or, diagnostic or follow up colonoscopy, during a 12-mo period in 2012 were prospectively recruited. Some patients had multiple polyps and total number of polyps was 179. Their colonoscopies were performed by 3 experienced endoscopists who determined the size and stated whether the polyps being removed were hyperplastic or adenomatous polyps using standard colonoscopes or high definition colonoscopes with NBI. The histopathologic diagnosis was reported by pathologists as part of routine care. RESULTS: Of participants in the study, 55(37%) were male and median(interquartile range) of age was 56(19-80). Demographic, clinical characteristics, past medical history of patients, and the data obtained by two instruments were not significantly different and two methods detected similar number of polyps. In ST scope 89% of polyps were 1 cm vs 87% in HD scope(P = 0.7). The ST scope had a positive predictive value(PPV) and positive likelihood ratio(PLR) of 86% and 4.0 for adenoma compared to 74% and 2.6 for HD scope. There was a trend of higher sensitivity for HD scope(68%) compare to ST scope(53%) with almost the same specificity. The ST scope had a PPV and PLR of 38% and 1.8 for hyperplastic polyp(HPP) compared to 42% and 2.2 for HD scope. The sensitivity and specificity of two instruments for HPP diagnosis were similar.CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that HD scope was more sensitive in diagnosis of adenoma than ST scope. Clinical diagnosis of HPP with either scope is less accurate compared to adenoma. Colonoscopy diagnosis is not yet fully matched with pathologic diagnosis of colon polyp. However with the advancement of both imaging and training, it may be possible to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the scopes and hence save money for eliminating time and the cost of Immunohistochemistry/pathology.     

The association of fasting insulin concentrations and colonic neoplasms in acromegaly: a colonoscopy-based study in 210 patients

CONTEXT: Hyperinsulinemia is associated with colon carcinoma in the general population. Patients with acromegaly are considered to be at risk for developing colonic lesions and typically have hyperinsulinemia. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the role of fasting insulin levels on the prevalence of colonic adenomatous polyps or adenocarcinoma in acromegaly. DESIGN: This is an analytical, observational, prospective study. Patients: A total of 210 patients (111 women, 99 men, age 20-82 yr) undergoing complete colonoscopy at diagnosis of acromegaly were included in this study. RESULTS: Colonic lesions were found in 81 patients (38.6%), and consisted of hyperplastic polyps in 33 (15.7%), adenomatous polyps in 42 (20.0%), and adenocarcinoma in six patients (2.8%). Polyps were single in 22 cases (27.1%). Fasting insulin levels were significantly lower in patients without lesions (16.0 +/- 7.5 mU/liter) than in patients with hyperplastic polyps (22.4 +/- 8.8 mU/liter; P < 0.01), adenomatous polyps (38.0 +/- 15.9 mU/liter; P < 0.0001), and adenocarcinoma (59.0 +/- 30.6 mU/liter; P < 0.0001). Fasting insulin levels were also lower in patients with hyperplastic polyps than in those with adenomatous polyps (P < 0.01). The odds ratio for harboring colonic adenomas was 14.8 (95% confidence interval 4.4-51.2; P < 0.0001) and 8.6 times higher (95% confidence interval 2.8-29.0; P < 0.0001) in patients with fasting insulin levels in the upper tertile [>/=27.1 mIU/liter (n = 28)] compared with the lower [12.1 to <27.1 mIU/liter (n = 74)], respectively. CONCLUSION: An increase in fasting insulin levels is associated with an 8.6- to 14.8-fold increased risk of presenting with colonic adenomas in acromegaly.     

Detection of proximal adenomatous polyps with screening sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy

BACKGROUND: The relative effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer depends on the magnitude of the association between findings in the proximal and distal colon and the false-negative rate of screening sigmoidoscopy for proximal neoplasia. To address this, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy studies. METHODS: Published studies through July 31, 2000, of asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy were identified from the MEDLINE database. We generated pooled estimates of the odds ratio for the association between findings in the distal and proximal colon and the prevalence of isolated proximal adenomatous neoplasia. RESULTS: Using the sigmoid-descending colon junction to identify the beginning of the distal colon, the pooled odds ratio for the association between distal adenomatous polyps and any proximal neoplasia was 2.40 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-4.05). Diminutive distal adenomatous polyps were also associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.30-4.29). Distal hyperplastic polyps were not associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.79-2.62). The prevalence of isolated advanced proximal neoplasia in the 3 studies was 2%, 3%, and 5%. Using the sigmoid-descending colon junction to identify the beginning of the distal colon yields a pooled estimate of isolated proximal neoplasia of 16.3% (95% CI, 13.6%-19.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Distal adenomatous polyps, including diminutive distal adenomatous polyps, are associated with an increased prevalence of synchronous proximal neoplasia. Two percent to 5% of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy may have isolated advanced proximal neoplasia. Even more patients may have isolated nonadvanced proximal neoplasia.     

Hyperplastic Colonic Polyps as a Marker for Adenomatous Colonic Polyps

Hyperplastic colonic polyps are generally regarded as being of little or no clinical consequence. Recently, however, hyperplastic polyps have been found to share numerous functional similarities with colorectal carcinoma. To determine whether the presence of an isolated left-sided colonic hyperplastic (metaplastic) polyp could serve as a marker for more proximal synchronous adenomatous colonic polyps, we retrospectively analyzed all consecutive colonoscopic polypectomies performed over an 18-month period at two medical centers. It is the policy at both institutions to remove or biopsy all polyps, regardless of size. Indications for colonoscopy included known or previous colonic polyps or carcinoma, hemoccult positive stool, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, iron deficiency anemia, abnormal barium enema, inflammatory bowel disease, abdominal pain, and family history of colon cancer. The location of adenomatous polyps and hyperplastic polyps was recorded and compared. One hundred sixty-three of 845 consecutive patients (19.3%) had at least one colonic polyp. The prevalence of adenomatous polyps alone was 10.3%, hyperplastic polyps 9%, and both types 1.9%. The prevalence rate for an adenomatous polyp in patients without a hyperplastic polyp was 15%. In contrast, among patients with a hyperplastic polyp, 49% had a synchronous adenomatous polyp. Only 3.4% of patients had an adenomatous polyp proximal to the splenic flexure when no polyps were present in the left colon. Conversely, among the 29 patients in whom an isolated hyperplastic polyp was found in the left colon, there was a 32.5% prevalence of adenomatous polyps in the proximal colon (p less than 0.01). The results of this study suggest that left-sided hyperplastic colonic polyps (generally within the reach of a screening sigmoidoscopy) serve as a marker for neoplastic polyps.     

Laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy of human colonic mucosa. Detection of adenomatous transformation

To evaluate the potential of laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy for the detection of premalignant lesions of the gastrointestinal tract, the hypothesis that adenomatous transformation of colonic mucosa results in an alteration of laser-induced fluorescence that enables its differentiation from normal or hyperplastic tissue was tested. A fiberoptic catheter coupled to a helium-cadmium laser (325 nm) and an optical multichannel analyzer were used to obtain fluorescence spectra (350-600 nm) from 35 normal colonic specimens and 35 resected adenomatous polyps. A score based on six wavelengths was derived by stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis of the spectra. The mean score (+/- SEM) was + 0.86 +/- 0.06 for normal mucosa and -0.86 +/- 0.06 for adenomatous polyps (P less than 0.001). Spectra from an additional 34 normal specimens, 16 adenomatous polyps, and 16 hyperplastic polyps were prospectively classified with accuracies of 100%, 100%, and 94%, respectively. The mean score for hyperplastic polyps was significantly different from adenomatous (P less than 0.001) but not from normal tissue. Thus, quantitative analysis of fluorescence spectra enables the detection of adenomatous transformation in colonic mucosa.     

Multicenter randomised controlled trial comparing the high definition white light endoscopy and the bright narrow band imaging for colon polyps

AIM To compare high definition white light endoscopy and bright narrow band imaging for colon polyps' detection rates. METHODS Patients were randomised to high definition white light endoscopy(HD-WLE) or the bright narrow band imaging(b NBI) during withdrawal of the colonoscope. Polyps identified in either mode were characterised using b NBI with dual focus(b NBI-DF) according to the Sano's classification. The primary outcome was to compare adenoma detection rates(ADRs) between the two arms. The secondary outcome was to assess the negative predictive value(NPV) in differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic polyps for diminutive rectosigmoid lesions.RESULTS A total of 1006 patients were randomised to HD-WLE(n = 511) or b NBI(n = 495). The mean of adenoma per patient was 1.62 and 1.84, respectively. The ADRs in b NBI and HD-WLE group were 37.4% and 39.3%, respectively. When adjusted for withdrawal time(OR = 1.19, 95%CI: 1.15-1.24, P 0.001), the use of b NBI was associated with a reduced ADR(OR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.52-0.92). Nine hundred and thirty three polyps(86%) in both arms were predicted with high confidence. The sensitivity(Sn), specificity(Sp), positive predictive value and NPV in differentiating adenomatous from non-adenomatous polyps of all sizes were 95.9%, 87.2%, 94.0% and 91.1% respectively. The NPV in differentiating an adenoma from hyperplastic polyp using b NBI-DF for diminutive rectal polyps was 91.0%.CONCLUSION ADRs did not differ between b NBI and HD-WLE, however HD-WLE had higher ADR after adjustment of withdrawal time. b NBI surpassed the PIVI threshold for diminutive polyps.     

Screening for Colon Malignancy with Colonoscopy

Screening of asymptomatic individuals for colon malignancy has been advocated for the past 20 yr in the hopes of reducing colon cancer mortality. Although sigmoidoscopy is an important element of current screening recommendations, the sensitivity of this test in asymptomatic subjects has never been studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and location of polyps and cancers in an asymptomatic population by performing full colonoscopy. We wished to assess the sensitivity of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy to 60 cm by determining how many patients with adenomas or cancer had "index" adenomatous polyps in the distal 60 cm. One hundred five healthy male outpatients, over 50 yr old, with negative examinations for occult blood in stools and no prior history of colon pathology, had full colonoscopy. Careful examination of the distal 60 cm was performed, followed by a full colon examination to the cecum. Forty-three patients (41%) had adenomatous polyps, and only 19 of these patients had an index adenomatous polyp in the distal 60 cm. Therefore, the sensitivity of sigmoidoscopy was 44%. The prevalence of adenomas increased with age. Patients were assigned to one of three groups based on the findings in the distal 60 cm. Group 1 (n = 65) had no polyps in the distal 60 cm, but 18 of these patients (28%) had adenomatous polyps in the proximal colon. Among 21 patients with only hyperplastic polyps in the distal 60 cm (group 2), six patients (29%) had proximal adenomas. In group 3, eight of 19 patients (42%) with adenomas in the distal 60 cm also had proximal adenomatous polyps. We conclude that adenomatous polyps are common in asymptomatic men who have negative tests for fecal occult blood. Sigmoidoscopy to 60 cm had a sensitivity of only 44% in this patient population, suggesting that this is an insensitive test for the detection of patients with adenomatous polyps.     

Clinical spectral characterisation of colonic mucosal lesions using autofluorescence and delta aminolevulinic acid sensitisation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Laser induced fluorescence (LIF) from colonic mucosa was measured in vivo with and without delta aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in an attempt to differentiate between neoplasia and non-neoplasia in real time during colonoscopy. METHODS: Spectra from 32 adenomas, 68 normal sites, and 14 hyperplastic polyps in 41 patients were obtained with a point monitoring system. Twenty one of the patients had been given a low dose of ALA as a photosensitiser before the examination. Light of 337, 405, or 436 nm wavelength was used as excitation. Stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: With 337 nm excitation, 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity was obtained between normal mucosa and adenomas. Seventy seven per cent of the hyperplastic polyps were classified as non-neoplastic. When exciting with 405 and 436 nm, the possibility of distinguishing different types of tissue was considerably better in the ALA patients than in the non-ALA patients. CONCLUSIONS: The in vivo point measurements imply that a good discrimination between normal tissue and adenomatous polyps can be obtained using the LIF technique. Excitation at 337 nm and at 405 nm or 436 nm using ALA gives good results. LIF also shows potential for distinguishing adenomatous from hyperplastic polyps. The number of detection wavelengths could be reduced if chosen properly.     

Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions

OBJECTIVE: Because the medical management of persons with adenomatous colorectal polyps differs from that of those with hyperplastic polyps, accuracy of diagnosis is essential. This study reports our experience using a magnifying colonoscope combined with indigocarmine dye to diagnose colorectal polyps, emphasizing its ability to differentiate neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions. METHODS: The materials consisted of 175 polyps. A 0.2% indigocarmine solution was sprayed, and the colonoscope zoom apparatus performed a magnified observation after an ordinary colonoscopy identified the lesions. The pit patterns were classified into six categories: I, II, III(L), IIIs, IV, and V according to Kudo's modified classification. RESULTS: The percentages of neoplastic changes in the lesions with pit pattern I, II, III(L), IIIs, IV, and V were 0, 12.2, 69.7, 80, 84.4, and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of neoplastic lesions was 93.8% and specificity was 64.6% when types I and II represented the pit pattern of nonneoplastic lesions and types III(L), IIIs, IV, and V represented neoplastic lesions. The overall diagnostic accuracy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions was 80.1%. The diagnostic accuracy is not influenced by the size and shape of the lesions. The six neoplastic lesions that were misjudged to be nonneoplastic were histologically adenoma with only mild atypia. CONCLUSIONS: The pit pattern analysis of colorectal lesions by magnifying colonoscopy is a useful and objective tool for differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic lesions of the large bowel. In its current state of development, however, this technique is not a substitute for histology.     

Diagnostic value of high-resolution micro-endoscopy for the classification of colon polyps

AIM: To study a new imaging equipment, highresolution micro-endoscopy(HRME), in the diagnosis and pathological classification of colon polyps.METHODS: We selected 114 specimens of colon polyps, 30 of which were colon polyps with known pathological types and 84 that were prospective polyp specimens; 10 normal colon mucosa specimens served as controls. We obtained images of 30 colon polyp specimens with known pathological types using HRME and analyzed the characteristics of these images to develop HRME diagnostic criteria for different pathological types of colon polyps. Based on these criteria, we performed a prospective study of 84 colon polyp specimens using HRME and compared the results with those of the pathological examination to evaluate the diagnostic value of HRME in the pathological classification of different types of colon polyps. RESULTS: In the 30 cases of known pathological type of colon polyp samples, there were 21 cases of adenomatous polyps, which comprised nine cases of tubular adenoma, seven cases of villous adenoma and five cases of mixed adenomas. The nine cases of non-adenomatous polyps included four cases of inflammatory polyps and five cases of hyperplastic polyps five. Ten cases of normal colonic mucosa were confirmed pathologically. In a prospective study of 84 cases using HRME, 23 cases were diagnosed as inflammatory polyps, 11 cases as hyperplastic polyps, 18 cases as tubular adenoma, eight cases as villous adenoma and 24 cases as mixed adenomas. After pathological examination, 24 cases were diagnosed as inflammatory polyps, 11 cases as hyperplastic polyps, 19 cases as tubular adenoma, eight cases as villous adenoma and 22 cases as mixed adenomas. Compared with the pathological examinations, the sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, and positive and negative predictive values of HRME in diagnosing inflammatory polyps(87.5%, 96.7%, 94.0%, 91.3% and 95.1%), hyperplastic polyps(72.7%, 95.9%, 92.9%, 72.7% and 95.9%), tubular adenomas(73.7%, 93.8%, 89.3%, 77.8% and 92.4%), villous adenomas(75.0%, 97.4%, 95.2%, 75.0% and 97.4%), and mixed adenomas(75.0%, 93.3%, 88.1%, 81.8% and 90.3%) were relatively high.CONCLUSION: HRME has a relatively high diagnostic value in the pathological classification of colon polyps. Thus, it may be an alternative to confocal microendoscopy in lower-resource or community-based settings.     

What does sigmoidoscopy really miss?

The relative effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with colonoscopy to screen for colorectal cancer depends on the magnitude of the association between findings in the proximal and distal colon and the false-negative rate of screening sigmoidoscopy for proximal neoplasia. Lewis et al. performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy studies. Published studies through July 31, 2000 of asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy were identified from the MEDLINE database. The authors generated pooled estimates of the odds ratio for the association between findings in the distal and proximal colon and the prevalence of isolated proximal adenomatous neoplasia. With the sigmoid–descending colon junction used to identify the beginning of the distal colon, the pooled odds ratio for the association between distal adenomatous polyps and any proximal neoplasia was 2.40 (95% confidence interval [Cl] = 1.42–4.05). Diminutive distal adenomatous polyps were also associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.30–4.29). Distal hyperplastic polyps were not associated with proximal neoplasia (odds ratio = 1.44; 95% CI = 0.79–6.62). The prevalence of isolated advanced proximal neoplasia in the three studies was 2%, 3%, and 5%, respectively. When the sigmoid–descending colon junction is used to identify the beginning of the distal colon, this yields a pooled estimate of isolated proximal neoplasia of 16.3% (95% CI = 13.6%–19.1%). Distal adenomatous polyps, including diminutive distal adenomatous polyps, are associated with an increasing prevalence of synchronous proximal neoplasia. From 2% to 5% of patients undergoing screening colonoscopy might have isolated advanced proximal neoplasia.