Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Warfarin Optimal Duration Italian Trial Investigators.

BACKGROUND: In patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, continuing anticoagulant therapy beyond three months is associated with a reduced incidence of recurrent thrombosis during the period of therapy. Whether this benefit persists after anticoagulant therapy is discontinued is controversial. METHODS: Patients with a first episode of idiopathic proximal deep venous thrombosis who had completed three months of oral anticoagulant therapy (with warfarin, in 97 percent of the cases and acenocoumarol in 3 percent) were randomly assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulants or to their continuation for nine additional months. The primary study outcome was recurrence of symptomatic, objectively confirmed venous thromboembolism during at least two years of follow-up. RESULTS: The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed that of 134 patients assigned to continued oral anticoagulant therapy, 21 had a recurrence of venous thromboembolism (15.7 percent; average follow-up, 37.8 months), as compared with 21 of 133 patients assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy (15.8 percent; average follow-up, 37.2 months), resulting in a relative risk of 0.99 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 1.73). During the initial nine months after randomization (after all patients received three months of therapy), 1 patient had a recurrence while receiving oral anticoagulant therapy (0.7 percent), as compared with 11 of the patients assigned to the discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy (8.3 percent; P=0.003). The incidence of recurrence after the discontinuation of treatment was 5.1 percent per patient-year in patients in whom oral anticoagulant therapy was discontinued after 3 months (95 percent confidence interval, 3.2 to 7.5 percent; average interval since discontinuation, 37.2 months) and 5.0 percent per patient-year in patients who received an additional 9 months of oral anticoagulant therapy (95 percent confidence interval, 3.1 to 7.8 percent; average interval since discontinuation, 29.4 months). None of the recurrences were fatal. Four patients had non-fatal major bleeding during the extended period of anticoagulant therapy (3.0 percent). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis, the clinical benefit associated with extending the duration of anticoagulant therapy to one year is not maintained after the therapy is discontinued.     

Safety of withholding heparin in pregnant women with a history of venous thromboembolism. Recurrence of Clot in This Pregnancy Study Group

BACKGROUND: Women with a history of venous thromboembolism may be at increased risk for venous thromboembolic events during pregnancy. In these women, the decision to give or withhold heparin in the antepartum period is controversial, because accurate estimates of the frequency of recurrent thromboembolic events if antepartum heparin is withheld are not available. METHODS: We prospectively studied 125 pregnant women with a single previous episode of venous thromboembolism. Antepartum heparin was withheld, but anticoagulant therapy was given for four to six weeks post partum. Our primary objective was to determine the rate of antepartum recurrence of venous thromboembolism. Laboratory studies were performed to identify thrombophilia in 95 women. RESULTS: Three of the 125 women (2.4 percent) had an antepartum recurrence of venous thromboembolism (95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 6.9 percent). There were no recurrences in the 44 women who had no evidence of thrombophilia and who also had a previous episode of thrombosis that was associated with a temporary risk factor. Among the 51 women with abnormal laboratory results or a previous episode of idiopathic thrombosis, or both, 3 (5.9 percent) had an antepartum recurrence of venous thromboembolism (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 16.2 percent). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of recurrent antepartum venous thromboembolism in women with a history of venous thromboembolism is low, and therefore routine antepartum prophylaxis with heparin is not warranted.     

High plasma levels of factor VIII and the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND: A high plasma level of factor VIII is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism. We evaluated the risk of a recurrence of thrombosis after an initial episode of spontaneous venous thromboembolism among patients with high plasma levels of factor VIII. METHODS: We studied 360 patients for an average follow-up period of 30 months after a first episode of venous thromboembolism and discontinuation of oral anticoagulants. Patients who had recurrent or secondary venous thromboembolism, a congenital deficiency of an anticoagulant, the lupus anticoagulant, hyperhomocysteinemia, cancer, or a requirement for long-term treatment with antithrombotic drugs or who were pregnant were excluded. The end point was objectively documented, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: Recurrent venous thromboembolism developed in 38 of the 360 patients (10.6 percent). Patients with recurrence had higher mean (+/-SD) plasma levels of factor VIII than those without recurrence (182+/-66 vs. 157+/-54 IU per deciliter, P=0.009). The relative risk of recurrent venous thrombosis was 1.08 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.12; P<0.001) for each increase of 10 IU per deciliter in the plasma level of factor VIII. Among patients with a factor VIII level above the 90th percentile of the values in the study population, the likelihood of recurrence at two years was 37 percent, as compared with a 5 percent likelihood among patients with lower levels (P<0.001). Among patients with plasma factor VIII levels above the 90th percentile, as compared with those with lower levels, the overall relative risk of recurrence was 6.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 3.0 to 14.8) after adjustment for age, sex, the presence or absence of factor V Leiden or the G20210A prothrombin mutation, and the duration of oral anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a high plasma level of factor VIII have an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism.     

Warfarin sodium versus low-dose heparin in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis.

Acute deep-vein thrombosis is usually treated with intravenous heparin for a number of days, then with oral anticoagulants for weeks to months. We have compared adjusted-dose warfarin sodium with fixed low-dose subcutaneous heparin in the prevention of recurrent deep-vein thrombosis. Sixty-eight patients with acute deep-vein thrombosis confirmed by venography were treated with intravenous heparin and then randomized to secondary prophylaxis. Nine of 35 patients receiving subcutaneous heparin, but none of 33 receiving warfarin sodium, had new episodes of objectively documented venous thromboembolism (P = 0.001). Seven patients on warfarin sodium experienced bleeding complications (of which four were major), as compared with no patients receiving subcutaneous heparin (P less than 0.005). Thus, adjusted-dose warfarin sodium is more effective than low-dose subcutaneous heparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism, but its use is accompanied by a significant risk of bleeding.     

A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis in patients with acute medical illnesses who may be at risk for venous thromboembolism have not been determined in adequately designed trials. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 1102 hospitalized patients older than 40 years to receive 40 mg of enoxaparin, 20 mg of enoxaparin, or placebo subcutaneously once daily for 6 to 14 days. Most patients were not in an intensive care unit. The primary outcome was venous thromboembolism between days 1 and 14, defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by bilateral venography (or duplex ultrasonography) between days 6 and 14 (or earlier if clinically indicated) or documented pulmonary embolism. The duration of follow-up was three months. RESULTS: The primary outcome could be assessed in 866 patients. The incidence of venous thromboembolism was significantly lower in the group that received 40 mg of enoxaparin (5.5 percent [16 of 291 patients]) than in the group that received placebo (14.9 percent [43 of 288 patients]) (relative risk, 0.37; 97.6 percent confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.63; P< 0.001). The benefit observed with 40 mg of enoxaparin was maintained at three months. There was no significant difference in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between the group that received 20 mg of enoxaparin (43 of 287 patients [15.0 percent]) and the placebo group. The incidence of adverse effects did not differ significantly between the placebo group and either enoxaparin group. By day 110, 50 patients had died in the placebo group (13.9 percent), 51 had died in the 20-mg group (14.7 percent), and 41 had died in the 40-mg group (11.4 percent); the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic treatment with 40 mg of enoxaparin subcutaneously per day safely and effectively reduces the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute medical illnesses.     

Deep-vein thrombosis and the incidence of subsequent symptomatic cancer.

BACKGROUND. In contrast to the established relation between overt cancer and subsequent venous thromboembolism, it is unclear whether symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis is associated with a risk of subsequent overt malignant disease. METHODS. Two hundred sixty consecutive patients with symptomatic, venographically proved deep-vein thrombosis were enrolled in a study, of whom 250 were followed during a two-year period. Among those assessed during follow-up, the incidence of subsequently detected cancer in the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (i.e., thrombosis associated with a well-recognized risk factor other than cancer) was compared with the incidence of cancer in the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis. RESULTS. Routine examination at the time of diagnosis of the venous thrombosis revealed cancer in 5 of the 153 enrolled patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (3.3 percent) and in none of the 107 enrolled patients with secondary venous thrombosis. During follow-up, overt cancer developed in 2 of the 105 patients with secondary venous thrombosis (1.9 percent) and in 11 of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis (7.6 percent; odds ratio, 2.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 5.2; P = 0.043). Of the 145 patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis, 35 had confirmed recurrent thromboembolism. Overt cancer subsequently developed in 6 of the 35 (17.1 percent). The incidence of cancer in the patients with recurrent idiopathic venous thrombosis was higher than that in the patients with secondary venous thrombosis (P = 0.008; odds ratio, 9.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 52.2) or in the patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis that did not recur (P = 0.024; odds ratio, 4.3; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 15.3). CONCLUSIONS. There is a statistically significant and clinically important association between idiopathic venous thrombosis and the subsequent development of clinically overt cancer, especially among patients in whom venous thromboembolism recurs during follow-up.     

Heparin for 5 days as compared with 10 days in the initial treatment of proximal venous thrombosis

It is common practice to begin anticoagulant treatment of deep-vein thrombosis with a 10-day course of intravenous heparin, with warfarin added on day 5 to 10 and continued for several months. We performed a randomized, double-blind trial comparing a shorter course of continuous intravenous heparin (5 days, with warfarin sodium begun on the first day) with the conventional 10-day course of heparin (with warfarin sodium begun on the fifth day) in the initial treatment of 199 patients with acute proximal venous thrombosis documented by venography. The frequency of objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism was low and essentially the same in the two groups (7.1 percent in the short-course group vs. 7.0 percent in the long-course group). Because the observed difference between the groups was 0.1 percent in favor of the long-course group, it is unlikely (P less than 0.05) that a true difference in favor of this group would be greater than 7.5 percent; the difference could be as much as 7.3 percent in favor of the short-course group. Major bleeding episodes were infrequent, and the rate was similar in both groups. We conclude that a five-day course of heparin is as effective as a 10-day course in treating deep venous thrombosis. Furthermore, using the shorter course would permit earlier discharge from the hospital and thus offer substantial cost savings.     

Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective major knee surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite thromboprophylaxis, major knee surgery carries a high risk of venous thromboembolism. Fondaparinux, the first of a new class of synthetic antithrombotic agents, may reduce this risk. METHODS: In a double-blind study, we randomly assigned 1049 consecutive patients undergoing elective major knee surgery to receive subcutaneous doses of either 2.5 mg of fondaparinux once daily or 30 mg of enoxaparin twice daily, with both treatments initiated postoperatively. The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism up to postoperative day 11, defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography, documented symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or documented symptomatic pulmonary embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome was assessed in 724 patients. The fondaparinux group had a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism by day 11 (12.5 percent [45 of 361 patients]) than the enoxaparin group (27.8 percent [101 of 363 patients]; reduction in risk, 55.2 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 36.2 to 70.2; P<0.001). Major bleeding (including overt bleeding with a bleeding index of 2 or more) occurred more frequently in the fondaparinux group (P=0.006), but there were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of bleeding leading to death or reoperation or occurring in a critical organ. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective major knee surgery, postoperative treatment with 2.5 mg of fondaparinux once daily was significantly more effective in preventing deep-vein thrombosis than 30 mg of enoxaparin twice daily.     

Fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip-fracture surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for hip fracture carries a high risk of venous thromboembolism, despite the use of current thromboprophylactic treatments. Fondaparinux, a synthetic pentasaccharide, is a new antithrombotic agent that may reduce this risk. METHODS: In a double-blind study, were randomly assigned 1711 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for fracture of the upper third of the femur to receive subcutaneous doses of either 2.5 mg of fondaparinux once daily, initiated postoperatively, or 40 mg of enoxaparin once daily, initiated preoperatively, for at least five days. The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism up to postoperative day 11. Venous thromboembolism was defined as deep-vein thrombosis detected by mandatory bilateral venography, documented symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, or documented symptomatic pulmonary embolism. The main safety outcomes were major bleeding and mortality from all causes. The duration of follow-up was six weeks. RESULTS: The incidence of venous thromboembolism by day 11 was 8.3 percent (52 of 626 patients) in the fondaparinux group and 19.1 percent (119 of 624 patients) in the enoxaparin group (P<0.001). The reduction in risk with fondaparinux was 56.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 39.0 to 70.3 percent). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of death or clinically relevant bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture, fondaparinux was more effective than enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism and equally safe.     

The duration of oral anticoagulation after deep vein thrombosis. A randomized study

Eighty patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were randomized between our routine duration of oral anticoagulation and 50% reduction thereof, in order to evaluate whether shorter therapy could be given without increased risks. The study was stratified, so that 20 patients with the 1st episode of DVT caused by a temporary risk factor were treated for 1.5 or 3 months, 40 patients with the 1st episode of DVT caused by a permanent risk factor for 3 or 6 months, and 20 patients with the 2nd episode of DVT for 6 or 12 months. When warfarin therapy was discontinued, the patients were followed by means of venous occlusion plethysmography every 3 months for 1 year, and clinically for 15-27 months in the different subgroups. Thromboembolic complications were registered and verified by venography and perfusion lung scan. We could not detect any difference between the groups. The rate of rethrombosis and embolism during 12 and 24 months after cessation of anticoagulant therapy was 8 and 10%, respectively, among the patients with reduced duration of treatment and 8 and 14%, respectively, among those with regular duration. One fatal, warfarin-induced hemorrhage occurred. It is important to reduce unnecessary extension of oral anticoagulation after DVT in order to minimize the negative side-effects without increasing the recurrence rate. More extensive trials should be performed to confirm our results and define the optimal duration of treatment.     

The effect of warfarin on mortality and reinfarction after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND AND METHODS. The use of oral anticoagulation in the long-term treatment of survivors of acute myocardial infarction has been highly controversial. We therefore randomly assigned 1214 patients who had recovered from acute myocardial infarction (mean interval from the onset of symptoms to randomization, 27 days) to treatment with warfarin (607 patients) or placebo (607 patients) for an average of 37 months (range, 24 to 63). RESULTS. At the end of the treatment period, there had been 123 deaths in the placebo group and 94 in the warfarin group--a reduction in risk of 24 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 44 percent; P = 0.027). A total of 124 patients in the placebo group had reinfarctions, as compared with 82 in the warfarin group--a reduction of 34 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 19 to 54 percent; P = 0.0007). Furthermore, we observed a reduction of 55 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 30 to 77 percent) in the number of total cerebrovascular accidents in the warfarin group as compared with the placebo group (44 vs. 20; P = 0.0015). Serious bleeding was noted in 0.6 percent of the warfarin-treated patients per year. CONCLUSIONS. Long-term therapy with warfarin has an important beneficial effect after myocardial infarction and can be recommended in the treatment of patients who survive the acute phase.     

Thromboembolism

The overall incidence of venous thromboembolism is about 0.7 per thousand maternities, but pulmonary embolus is currently the single most common cause of maternal mortality. Major risk factors are operative delivery, age, multiparity and previous thromboembolism. Because of the risks in anticoagulant therapy and the difficulties of clinical diagnosis, it is essential to use objective tests, usually venography for deep-vein thrombosis and lung scan for pulmonary embolus. The acute phase will normally be treated with a continuous infusion of heparin, followed by subcutaneous heparin, given until at least six weeks post-delivery. Warfarin may be substituted after the first week post-delivery. In contrast to the treatment of other forms of thromboembolism, patients with artificial heart valves should be managed with warfarin until 36 weeks of pregnancy. Although the fetal risks in warfarin therapy are greater than those of subcutaneous heparin, the obvious alternative, subcutaneous heparin, does not provide adequate prophylaxis against thromboembolism. In patients who have had venous thromboembolism in the past, the maternal risks do not justify prolonged prophylaxis with subcutaneous heparin as usually given (20 000 units per day) throughout pregnancy. Further clinical trials are necessary to select the best alternatives. Antithrombin III deficiency should be managed with subcutaneous heparin taken from before conception until at least one week post-delivery, when warfarin therapy can be recommended. In addition, the labour should be covered with antithrombin III concentrate.     

Incidence of cancer after prophylaxis with warfarin against recurrent venous thromboembolism. Duration of Anticoagulation Trial

BACKGROUND: The length of time after an episode of venous thromboembolism during which the risk of newly diagnosed cancer is increased is not known, and whether vitamin K antagonists have an antineoplastic effect is controversial. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study of the duration of oral anticoagulation (six weeks or six months) after a first episode of venous thromboembolism, patients were questioned annually about any newly diagnosed cancer. After a mean follow-up of 8.1 years, we used the Swedish Cancer Registry to identify all diagnoses of cancer and causes of death in the study population. The observed numbers of cases of cancer were compared with expected numbers based on national incidence rates, and the standardized incidence ratios were calculated. RESULTS: A first cancer was diagnosed in 111 of 854 patients (13.0 percent) during follow-up. The standardized incidence ratio for newly diagnosed cancer was 3.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.2 to 4.6) during the first year after the thromboembolic event and remained between 1.3 and 2.2 for the following five years. Cancer was diagnosed in 66 of 419 patients (15.8 percent) who were treated for six weeks with oral anticoagulants, as compared with 45 of 435 patients (10.3 percent) who were treated for six months (odds ratio, 1.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.4). The difference was mainly due to the occurrence of new urogenital cancers, of which there were 28 cases in the six-week group (6.7 percent) and 12 cases in the six-month group (2.8 percent) (odds ratio, 2.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 5.0). The difference in the incidence of cancer between the treatment groups became evident only after two years of follow-up, and it remained significant after adjustment for sex, age, and whether the thromboembolism was idiopathic or nonidiopathic. Older age at the time of the venous thrombosis and an idiopathic thromboembolism were also independent risk factors for a diagnosis of cancer. No difference in the incidence of cancer-related deaths was detected. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of newly diagnosed cancer after a first episode of venous thromboembolism is elevated during at least the following two years. Subsequently, the risk seems to be lower among patients treated with oral anticoagulants for six months than among those treated for six weeks.     

Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis

We performed a randomized double-blind trial comparing continuous intravenous heparin with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of 115 patients with acute proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Intermittent subcutaneous heparin as administered in this trial was inferior to continuous intravenous heparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism. The subcutaneous heparin regimen induced an initial anticoagulant response below the target therapeutic range in the majority of patients and resulted in a high frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism (11 of 57 patients, 19.3 percent), which was virtually confined to patients with a subtherapeutic anticoagulant response. In contrast, continuous intravenous heparin induced a therapeutic anticoagulant response in the majority of patients and a low frequency of recurrent events (3 of 58 patients, 5.2 percent; P = 0.024); the recurrences were limited to patients with an initial subtherapeutic anticoagulant response. The results of this trial establish the efficacy of intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal venous thrombosis and suggest a relation between the effectiveness of heparin and the levels of anticoagulation achieved; such a relation could explain the observed failure of the subcutaneous regimen.     

Direct oral anticoagulants in antiphospholipid syndrome: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundThe gold standard for secondary thromboprophylaxis in APS is long term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Because of their widespread use and potential advantages of directs oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over VKAs, they have been prescribed in APS without definitive evidence of their safety and efficacy in this context. Recent specific randomized controlled trials (RCT) in APS and results from pivotal RCTs comparing DOACs vs VKAs are now available. Their results are conflicting but these studies have been conducted in different APS populations.Purpose of reviewTo summarize available data from RCT and determine risks of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding.ResultsFour studies were included and 23 and 10 thrombotic events were recorded among 282 and 294 APS patients treated with DOACs and warfarin respectively. Overall recurrent thrombotic events were not significantly increased during DOACs treatment (OR = 2.22 [95% CI, 0.58–8.43]) compared to VKAs. However, when different types of thrombosis were analyzed separately, there was an increased risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis (5.17 [95% CI, 1.57–17.04]) with DOACs compared to warfarin but no significant higher risk of venous thrombosis (OR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.23–2.06). No increased risk of bleeding was found.In conclusionIn APS patients treated with DOACs compared to those treated with warfarin, no evidence of a higher risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism was found however there was a significantly increased risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis. Moreover risk of recurrent arterial thrombosis tended to be more frequent in patients with a history of arterial thrombosis. These results are in line with international guidelines which recommend not to use DOACs in APS patients with a history of arterial thrombosis but raise the question of the efficacy of DOACs to prevent venous thrombosis in a subset of APS patients without a history of arterial thrombosis.     

Risk factors of recurrent venous thromboembolism: the role of residual vein thrombosis

In 313 consecutive symptomatic outpatients with proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who had a conventional anticoagulation, an ultrasound assessment of the common femoral and the popliteal vein was performed three months after the acute episode, and then at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Veins were considered as recanalized in case of a vein diameter < 2.0 mm in a single determination, or < 3.0 mm in two consecutive determinations. Of the 58 patients who experienced recurrent episodes, 41 occurred while the patient still had residual thrombosis. The hazard ratio of recurrent thromboembolism was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.4; p =0.004) for persistent residual thrombosis versus early vein recanalization. In conclusion, residual venous thrombosis should be regarded as an important risk factor of recurrent thromboembolism.     

Endoscopic ligation compared with combined treatment with nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND: After an episode of acute bleeding from esophageal varices, patients are at high risk for recurrent bleeding and death. We compared two treatments to prevent recurrent bleeding--endoscopic ligation and combined medical therapy with nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate. METHODS: We randomly assigned 144 patients with cirrhosis who were hospitalized with esophageal variceal bleeding to receive treatment with endoscopic ligation (72 patients) or the combined medical therapy (72 patients). Sessions of ligation were repeated every two to three weeks until the varices were eradicated. The initial dose of nadolol was 80 mg orally once daily, with adjustment according to the resting heart rate; isosorbide mononitrate was given in increasing doses, beginning at 20 mg once a day at bed time and rising over the course of one week to 40 mg orally twice a day, unless side effects occurred. The primary end points were recurrent bleeding, complications, and death. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 21 months. A total of 35 patients in the ligation group and 24 in the medication group had recurrent bleeding. The probability of recurrence was lower in the medication group, both for all episodes related to portal hypertension (P=0.04) and for recurrent variceal bleeding (P=0.04). There were major complications in nine patients treated with ligation (seven had bleeding esophageal ulcers and two had aspiration pneumonia) and two treated with medication (both had bradycardia and dyspnea) (P=0.05). Thirty patients in the ligation group died, as did 23 patients in the medication group (P=0.52). The probability of recurrent bleeding was lower for patients with a hemodynamic response to therapy, defined as a decrease in the hepatic venous pressure gradient of more than 20 percent from the base-line value or to less than 12 mm Hg (18 percent, vs. 54 percent in patients with no hemodynamic response at one year; P<0.001), and the probability of survival was higher (94 percent vs. 78 percent at one year, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with nadolol and isosorbide mononitrate is more effective than endoscopic ligation for the prevention of recurrent bleeding and is associated with a lower rate of major complications. A hemodynamic response to treatment is associated with a better long-term prognosis.     

The role of ximelagatran in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

Clinical-based evidence demonstrates that long-term oral anticoagulant therapy with the vitamin K antagonists is highly effective for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, owing to fear of bleeding complications and the inconvenience of coagulation monitoring, many patients do not receive the required duration of treatment. This can lead to a high incidence of recurrent VTE events and has prompted the evaluation of alternative treatment strategies and the development of new anticoagulants for VTE management. For patient groups in which it is particularly difficult to maintain the target intensity of anticoagulation, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been found to significantly reduce the risk of recurrent VTE without increasing bleeding risk. The parenteral administration of LMWH, however, is a drawback for long-term use in the outpatient setting. Long-term warfarin use at a lower intensity (international normalized ratio [INR] 1.5-2.0) has also been assessed as a possible strategy to reduce bleeding complications and the need for monitoring, but results were disappointing when compared with conventional-intensity warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0). New therapies in development that may potentially offer a more favourable benefit-risk profile and greater consistency and predictability of response include the synthetic pentasaccharides, fondaparinux and idraparinux. These par enterally administered indirect factor Xa inhibitors have a predictable pharmacokinetic profile, allowing use without coagulation monitoring. Fondaparinux to date has only been evaluated in the initial treatment (5-7 days) of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis. In contrast, idraparinux, with its longer half-life (80 h) allowing once-weekly parenteral dosing, has the potential for long-term treatment and is currently being assessed in phase III trials for the secondary prevention of VTE. Currently, the most promising new therapeutic option is the first of the oral direct thrombin inhibitors, ximelagatran. The THRombin Inhibitor in VEnous thromboembolism (THRIVE) clinical trial programme has demonstrated that this agent is as effective as standard therapy for the acute treatment (THRIVE Treatment) and secondary prevention (THRIVE lll) of VTE events and is well tolerated when used for 6 months or over extended periods up to 1.5 years. Furthermore, with oral administration, fixed dosing and no requirement for anticoagulation monitoring, ximelagatran has the potential to facilitate optimal use and duration of VTE treatment by overcoming the limitations of current agents.     

Effects of a low-molecular-weight heparin on thrombus regression and recurrent thromboembolism in patients with deep-vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparins are frequently used to treat venous thromboembolism, but optimal dosing regimens and clinical outcomes need further definition. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudication of end points, we randomly assigned patients with acute deep-vein thrombosis to one of three treatment regimens: intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin; subcutaneous administration of a low-molecular-weight heparin, reviparin, twice a day for one week; or subcutaneous administration of reviparin once a day for four weeks. The primary end point was evidence of regression of the thrombus on venography on day 21; secondary end points were recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding within 90 days after enrollment, and death. RESULTS: Of the patients receiving unfractionated heparin, 40.2 percent (129 of 321) had thrombus regression, as compared with 53.4 percent (175 of 328) of patients receiving reviparin twice daily and 53.5 percent (167 of 312) of the patients receiving reviparin once daily. With regard to thrombus regression, reviparin administered twice daily was significantly more effective than unfractionated heparin (relative likelihood of thrombus regression, 1.28; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.52), as was reviparin administered once daily (relative likelihood, 1.29; 97.5 percent confidence interval, 1.08 to 1.53). Mortality and the frequency of episodes of major bleeding were similar in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: In acute deep-vein thrombosis, reviparin regimens are more effective than unfractionated heparin in reducing the size of the thrombus. Reviparin is also more effective than unfractionated heparin for the prevention of recurrent thromboembolism and equally safe.     

Assessment of the risk and prophylactic treatment of venous thromboembolism in the elderly

Numerous large randomized controlled trials have assessed the benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism in selected patients. However, few trials were conducted in elderly patients, as this issue was not addressed in this specific population,or as elderly patients were excluded of these studies. Therefore, as the risk of a first episode of venous thromboembolism (in surgical and in medical setting) and the risk of a major anticoagulant-related bleeding are both increased in elderly subjects, the results of the main available studies can not be extrapolated to this population. Consequently, in practice, the balance between expected benefit and risk of prophylactic anticoagulation should be carefully assessed for each individual elderly patient taking in account the specific risk of venous thromboembolism in elderly in the absence of anticoagulation, the risk of anticoagulant related bleeding according to the type of anticoagulant treatment and the intrinsic risk of bleeding of elderly subjects and, lastly, the available guideline recommendations. In order to improve such evaluation, it is anticipated that further prophylactic studies are needed in elderly patients. In addition, the development of anticoagulation clinics and new oral anticoagulants should help to reduce anticoagulant related bleeding for an equivalent, or an increased, benefit.