A 3 to 4 year study of single tooth hydroxylapatite coated endosseous dental implants.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness, common complications and maintenance associated with hydroxylapatite (HA) coated cylindrical implants when used to support single crowns. DESIGN: A prospective medium term clinical study of the Calcitek HA-coated implant. SETTING: Implant placement, crown fabrication and follow-up procedures were carried out at the Leeds Dental Institute, between 1990 and 1998. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: 26 patients (33 implants) participated in the trial. They were referred from general dental practitioners because of their suitability for single tooth implant placement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The implants were assessed using recognised clinical review procedures e.g. radiographs and soft tissue assessments. RESULTS: At exposure there was 100% implant integration. The cumulative survival rate over 4 years was 100%. In five implants there was cervical bone loss of more than 4 mm and these were classified as failing. This gave an overall cumulative success rate of 58% by year 4. CONCLUSION: The Calcitek HA-coated single tooth implant shows exceptionally high initial integration however, the longer term results suggest that the cervical bone level adjacent to the implant failed to establish a steady state. Doubts remain regarding the long-term prognosis of these cylindrical HA-coated implants.     

A 10‐Year Prospective Study of Single Tooth Implants Placed in the Anterior Maxilla

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the biological and technical outcomes of early and delayed placed single tooth implants after 10 years of follow‐up. Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive patients who needed a single tooth replacement in the anterior maxilla were included in this study. Ten implants were placed with an early placement protocol, that is, 4 weeks after tooth extraction, whereas the other 10 implants were placed with a conventional delayed placement protocol, for example, 12 weeks after tooth extraction. At the baseline and at the annual re‐examinations, pain from implant regions, mobility, plaque, mucositis, and marginal bone levels were recorded. Biological and technical complications were registered. The patients evaluated the functional and aesthetic outcomes subjectively on a visual analogue scale after 3 and 10 years. Results: All implants were still in situ after 10 years. The cumulative implant survival rate was 100%. Two implant‐supported crowns were remade because of ceramic fractures. The 10‐year crown survival rate was 90%. No significant differences in implant survival rates were found between the early and delayed protocols, regarding plaque retention, mucositis, or marginal bone levels. After 10 years, the mean marginal bone loss at both sides of the implants was less than 1.0 mm in the two groups. During the 10‐year interval, 1 patient lost more than 1.5 mm of marginal bone, 3 patients lost between 1.0 mm and 1.4 mm of bone, and 16 patients lost less than 1.0 mm of bone as an average of the mesial and distal bone loss. Conclusions: This 10‐year prospective clinical trial demonstrated a 100% implant survival and a 90% crown survival. The average marginal bone level change was less than 1 mm, and there was no difference between early and delayed implant placement. Patient satisfaction with the implant‐supported single crowns reduced with time.     

A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. I: Clinical and radiographic results

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term fixture success rate, crestal bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue parameters around ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region of partially edentulous patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 192 ITI dental implants were consecutively placed in premolars and molars of 83 partially edentulous patients admitted for treatment at Geneva Dental School. All implants were restored by means of ceramic-to-metal fused fixed partial dentures and single crowns. Patients were followed as part of a prospective longitudinal study focusing on implant success. Surgical, radiographic and clinical variables were collected at the 1-year recall after implant placement and at the most recent clinical evaluation. RESULTS: The mean observation time was 6 years (range 5-10 years). Four implants failed, yielding a 10-year cumulative survival rate of 97.9%. The mean annual crestal bone loss was -0.04+/-0.2 mm. Hollow-cylinder implants displayed more crestal bone loss (-0.13+/-0.24 mm) than hollow-screw implants (-0.02+/-0.19 mm; P=0.032). Clinical parameters such as age, gender, implant length and bone quality did not affect crestal bone levels. Increase in recession depth (P=0.025) and attachment level (P=0.011) were significantly associated with crestal bone loss. CONCLUSIONS: ITI dental implants placed in the posterior jaw demonstrate excellent long-term clinical success. Hollow-cylinder implants seem to display a higher risk for crestal bone loss. Recession depth and attachment levels appear to be good clinical indicators of peri-implant bone loss.     

A 4-year prospective clinical and radiological study of maxillary dental implants supporting single-tooth crowns using early and delayed loading protocols

Background: Recent studies have showed that immediate/early loading of dental implants is a clinically feasible concept with results similar to those for standard two‐stage procedures, especially in the mandible. However, there are only a few studies regarding the immediate/early loading of maxillary implants supporting single‐tooth crowns. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of early‐ and delayed‐loaded dental implants supporting single‐tooth crowns in the maxilla. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐nine patients were consecutively treated between 2000 and 2002 with 59 Brånemark System MK III TiUnite implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Göteborg, Sweden) in the maxilla. Two groups were formed according to the loading protocols. In the test group, definitive implant‐supported single crowns were delivered to 19 patients 6 weeks after the implant placement. In the control group, definitive implant‐supported single crowns were delivered to 10 patients 6 months after the implant placement. Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline, 1 to 4 years. Implant stability measurements have only been performed at 4‐year follow‐up recall. Results: Overall, three implants were lost during the study period. Two implants were lost in the test group including 36 implants, which indicated a survival rate of 94.4%. One of the lost implants was replaced and then osseointegrated successfully. One implant was lost in the control group during the healing period, which indicated a survival rate of 95.7%. The average marginal bone loss was 1.11 mm for 56 implants after 4 years. There were no significant differences in marginal bone levels, insertion torque, and resonance frequency values between the two groups. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that 6 weeks of early loading period for TiUnite‐surface titanium implants in the maxilla is reliable and predictable for this patient population and may offer an alternative to the standard loading protocol.     

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes and Bone Loss around Titanium Implants with Oxidized Surface: Six‐Year Follow‐Up Results from a Prospective Case Series Study

Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess long‐term clinical outcomes and peri‐implant bone level changes around oxidized implants supporting partial fixed rehabilitations. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐two partially edentulous patients were included in the study. A total of 33 fixed rehabilitations were placed, supported by 54 titanium implants with oxidized microtextured surface. Prostheses were delivered after 3 and 6 months of implant placement in the mandible and maxilla, respectively. Patients were scheduled for follow‐up at 6 and 12 months and then yearly. At each follow‐up, plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and periapical radiographs were taken. The main outcomes were prosthesis success, implant survival, implant success, and marginal bone level change. Results: Three patients were excluded from the study because they did not attend the 1‐year follow‐up. Nineteen patients, accounting for 49 implants, were followed for at least 6 years after prosthesis delivery. The mean follow‐up duration was 81.8 months (range 75–96 months). One mandibular single‐tooth implant failed after 1 year in a smoker woman. Cumulative implant survival and success at 6 years were 98.0% and 95.9%, respectively. Prosthesis success was 96.7%. The mean peri‐implant bone loss at 6 years was 0.76 ± 0.47 mm. Not significantly (p = .75) greater bone loss was found in the maxilla (0.78 ± 0.14 mm, n = 19) as compared with the mandible (0.74 ± 0.59 mm, n = 30). In the maxilla, bone loss was significantly greater around implants supporting partial prostheses as compared with single‐tooth implants (p = .03). Full patient satisfaction was reported. Conclusion: Implants with oxidized microtextured surface may achieve excellent long‐term clinical outcomes in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism.     

Implant and root supported overdentures - a literature review and some data on bone loss in edentulous jaws

PURPOSE

To present a literature review on implant overdentures after a brief survey of bone loss after extraction of all teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Papers on alveolar bone loss and implant overdentures have been studied for a narrative review.

RESULTS

Bone loss of the alveolar process after tooth extraction occurs with great individual variation, impossible to predict at the time of extraction. The simplest way to prevent bone loss is to avoid extraction of all teeth. To keep a few teeth and use them or their roots for a tooth or root-supported overdenture substantially reduces bone loss. Jaws with implant-supported prostheses show less bone loss than jaws with conventional dentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures provide patients with better outcomes than do conventional dentures, regarding satisfaction, chewing ability and oral-health-related quality of life. There is no strong evidence for the superiority of one overdenture retention-system over the others regarding patient satisfaction, survival, peri-implant bone loss and relevant clinical factors. Mandibular single midline implant overdentures have shown promising results but long-term results are not yet available. For a maxillary overdenture 4 to 6 implants splinted with a bar provide high survival both for implants and overdenture.

CONCLUSION

In edentulous mandibles, 2-implant overdentures provide excellent long-term success and survival, including patient satisfaction and improved oral functions. To further reduce the costs a single midline implant overdenture can be a promising option. In the maxilla, overdentures supported on 4 to 6 implants splinted with a bar have demonstrated good functional results.     

Biologic and mechanical stability of single-tooth implants: 4- to 7-year follow-up

Background: Single‐tooth implants have been reported to achieve a high level of surgical and prosthetic success. However, close inspection of the literature reveals a paucity of data on the follow‐up of single‐tooth implants in function for 5 years or more. Since unsplinted implants may be considered to be subject to greater functional stresses, there is a need to report on the long‐term biologic and mechanical integrity of such implant‐supported restorations. Purpose: To report on the long‐term follow‐up of single‐tooth implants, restored and in function for 4 to 7 years. Materials and Methods: Twenty‐seven Astra Tech single‐tooth implants were subject to a clinical audit to evaluate implant and prosthetic success as well as response of both hard and soft tissues over a 1‐ to 4‐year follow‐up. This current report presents data on the biologic and mechanical integrity of 23 of these single‐tooth implants, which have been in function for up to 7 years (mean, 63 mo). Data are provided with respect to implant survival, maintenance of marginal bone levels, soft‐tissue health, and the recording of any adverse events, including prosthetic complications. Results: Only 14 implants in 13 patients were available for review, with no failures for this group of implants. One patient from the original group, who was lost to follow‐up, was known to have suffered an implant failure. Furthermore, in accordance with established criteria, the remaining 13 implants that are not included in this report must at this time also be considered as potential failures. As such, the best‐case scenario would be a 95.6% success rate for the 23 implants included in this review and the worst‐case scenario would be a 60.8% success rate. Mean marginal bone loss measured 0.49 mm mesially and 0.76 mm distally, with a frequency of bone loss of 50%. Soft tissues were clinically healthy. There were few adverse events, with only one case of abutment screw loosening, detected at the 6‐year review. In addition, crown decementation was recorded three times in two patients. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the Astra Tech single‐tooth implant can achieve long‐term biologic and mechanical stability when used to restore single missing teeth, over the long‐term.     

Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical comparative study

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report a clinical comparative assessment of crestal bone level change around single implants in fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone of the maxilla either immediately loaded or loaded after a delay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were included in a prospective, randomized study. All patients required 1 tooth extraction (ie, 1 tooth with a hopeless prognosis) and were randomized into either the test group or the control group. Implants were positioned immediately after tooth extraction and were loaded immediately in the test group (20 implants) and after 3 months in the control group (20 implants). The implant site was prepared, with at least 4 mm of sound apical bone below the implant apex, and the coronal margin of the implant was placed at the buccal level of the bone crest. All implants were 13 mm long; 30 implants had a diameter of 5 mm, and 10 had a diameter of 3.75 mm. Radiographic examinations were made at baseline, at 6 months, and at 24 months. To compare the mean values between test and control group, a paired t test was performed (considered statistically significant at P < .05). RESULTS: After a 24-month follow-up period, a cumulative survival rate of 100% was reported for all implants. The control group resulted in a mean mesial bone loss of 1.16 +/- 0.32 mm and a mean distal bone loss of 1.17 +/- 0.41 (mean bone loss, 1.16 +/- 0.51 mm). The test group resulted in a mesial bone loss of 0.93 +/- 0.51 mm and a distal bone loss of 1.1 +/- 0.27 mm (mean bone loss, 1.02 +/- 0.53 mm). No statistically significant difference between control and test groups (P > .05) was found. CONCLUSION: The success rate and radiographic results of immediate restorations of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets were comparable to those obtained in delayed loading group.     

Early loading of single crowns supported by 6‐mm‐long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2‐year follow‐up cohort study

Aim: To evaluate prospectively the clinical and radiographic outcomes after 2 years of loading of 6 mm long moderately rough implants supporting single crowns in the posterior regions. Material and methods: Forty SLActive Straumann^® short (6 mm) implants were placed in 35 consecutively treated patients. Nineteen implants, 4.1 mm in diameter, and 21 implants, 4.8 mm in diameter, were installed. Implants were loaded after 6 weeks of healing. Implant survival rate, marginal bone loss and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were evaluated at different intervals. The clinical crown/implant ratio was also calculated. Results: Two out of 40 implants were lost before loading. Hence, the survival rate before loading was 95%. No further technical or biological complications were encountered during the 2‐year follow‐up. The mean marginal bone loss before loading was 0.34±0.38 mm. After loading, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.23±0.33 and 0.21±0.39 mm at the 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐ups. The RFA values increased between insertion (70.2±9) and the 6‐week evaluation (74.8±6.1). The clinical crown/implant ratio increased with time from 1.5 at the delivery of the prosthesis to 1.8 after 2 years of loading. Conclusion: Short implants (6 mm) with a moderately rough surface loaded early (after 6 weeks) during healing yielded high implant survival rates and moderate loss of bone after 2 years of loading. Longer observation periods are needed to draw more definite conclusions on the reliability of short implants supporting single crowns. To cite this article:
Rossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6‐mm‐long implants with a moderately rough surface: a prospective 2‐year follow‐up cohort study.
Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 21 , 2010; 937–943.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2010.01942.x     

Evaluation of peri-implant bone levels and soft tissue dimensions around zirconia implants—a three-year follow-up study

The aim of this study was to measure bone levels around zirconia implants during follow-up of up to 3 years. Additionally, the effect of clinical contact point positions on the papilla deficit was evaluated. Eighty-one patients with 105 zirconia implants were examined at the 3-year follow-up. Bone levels were measured on the date of implant placement and at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years thereafter. Distances between the first bone–implant contact and the contact point of the crowns and between the bone level at the adjacent tooth and the contact point of the crowns were assessed. The effect of the clinical contact point position on the papilla deficit was also assessed. Significant reductions in the distances between the bone–implant contact and the implant shoulder, as well as the contact point of the crowns, and between the bone level at the adjacent tooth and the contact point of the crowns, were found. A significant association was found between the papilla deficit and the height of the contact point. Implant survival was 100% and implant success was 95.4%. While zirconia implants presented little bone loss up to 1 year, significant bone apposition was observed up to 3 years. Low contact points correlated with full papillae, whereas high contact points were associated with a papilla deficit.     

Immediate placement of implants in extraction sites of maxillary impacted canines

BACKGROUND: Treatment of asymptomatic impacted maxillary canines in adults is inevitable when primary canine becomes lost through extraction or exfoliation or when the impacted tooth becomes symptomatic. Treatment alternatives include an orthodontic procedure to bring the unerupted tooth to the dental arch or prosthetic replacement of the missing tooth. The authors describe an alternative treatment that involves immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets of the teeth. CASE DESCRIPTION: A patient with bilateral palatally impacted upper canines chose to have the unerupted teeth removed and replaced with implants and crowns. Two hydroxyapatite cylindrical implants were inserted through the alveolar ridge into the extraction sites. The unfilled areas in the extraction sites, around the dental implants, were packed and covered with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in conjunction with a collagen membrane barrier. Six months after implantation, computed tomography revealed complete osseous fill of the extraction defects and no bone loss around the implants. The implants were uncovered, and porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations were fabricated and placed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This treatment modality avoids the need for conventional preparation of teeth as part of prosthetic reconstruction or prolonged orthodontic treatment aimed at bringing the impacted canine to the dental arch. Combining the implantation with bone augmentation preserved the alveolar bone and shortened the treatment period.     

Brånemark System Wide Platform implants for single molar replacement: clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials

Background: The use of oral implants for single tooth replacement has become a predictable treatment modality. As single tooth loss is most common in posterior areas of the jaws, the use of the protocol is of specific interest in those regions. New implant designs aimed at this purpose have also been introduced. Purpose: The aim of the study was to present the outcomes for wide diameter implant treatment when being used in posterior areas of the jaws. Materials and Methods: This paper presents the 3‐year results of a prospective multicenter study (three clinics; n = 38 implants) and the 1‐year results from a retrospective multicenter study (two clinics; n = 20 implants) on wide diameter implants for single molar replacement. Based on the hypothesis that dense bone in posterior mandibles would benefit from careful surgery and longer remodeling time, the influences of surgical technique and healing time on implant success and bone resorption were particularly addressed. Results: The outcome demonstrated a good predictability for Brånemark System® Wide Platform implants, at least short term, when used as single molar support (prospective group cumulative success rate [CSR] = 92% after 3 years; retrospective group CSR = 95% after 1 year). The increased mechanical strength of the wide platform implant/abutment complex also turned out to be important for mechanical stability. Conclusions: The study indicated that it was important to carefully perform surgery in posterior mandibles in order to preserve and optimally use the existing dense bone. It was suggested that from bone healing and remodeling aspects, posterior mandibles may be more demanding to handle than corresponding areas of maxillae.     

Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients

This prospective clinical study evaluated the 5-year survival and success rates of 66 titanium implants placed in bone that had been previously augmented with autografts and nonresorbable barrier membranes. During the observation period, three patients with five implants dropped out of the study. None of the remaining 61 implants were lost during the follow-up period (implant survival rate of 100%). One implant exhibited a periimplant infection, whereas 60 implants were considered clinically successful at the 5-year examination, resulting in a 5-year success rate of 98.3%. It can be concluded that the clinical results of implants in regenerated bone are comparable to those of implants in nonregenerated bone.     

Multicenter retrospective study of cement-retained implant-supported anterior partial prostheses: success and restoration evaluation

PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate implant success and restorative complications of cement-retained implant-supported anterior partial prostheses in Jordan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of all implants with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were used to support fixed, cement-retained restorations from April 2000 until March 2007. The cement-retained implants were loaded with either single- or multiple-tooth replacements. The Fisher exact test was performed to test the presence of any statistically significant difference in success concerning gender or arch of placement. RESULTS: Eighty-seven implants were placed in the anterior region of the mandible or maxilla in 49 patients at multiple clinical practices in Jordan. The age of the patients ranged from 17 to 85 years. Eighteen implants were placed in the mandible and 69 in the maxilla. Three maxillary implants in 2 male patients had 3-mm horizontal bone loss. Those 3 implants are still functioning and were considered surviving implants but not successful implants. Therefore, the implant cumulative survival rate for both arches and genders was 100%. The implant cumulative success rate was 95.78%. Three crowns (maxillary) were dislodged. No significant differences were revealed regarding gender or arch of placement (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Cement-retained implants exhibited high survival and success rates among a Jordanian population.     

Ten Years Later. Results from a Prospective Single‐Centre Clinical Study on 121 Oxidized (TiUnite™) Brånemark Implants in 46 Patients

Background: Concerns have been raised that use of surface‐modified implants may result in peri‐implant infection and marked marginal bone loss over time. Purpose: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the survival rate, marginal bone, and soft tissue conditions at surface‐modified titanium dental implants after 10 years of function. Material and Methods: Forty‐six totally and partially edentulous patients were provided with 121 Brånemark oxidized implants (TiUnite?, Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden). Twenty‐four (20%) implants were immediate loaded and 97 (80%) were placed using a two‐stage procedure. A total of 22 single, 23 partial, and 7 total restorations were delivered. Clinical and radiographic checkups were carried out after 3, 6, 12 months, and thereafter annually up to 10 years. At these occasions, oral hygiene was evaluated and peri‐implant mucosa examined by probing. If needed, patients were enrolled in an individual program for hygiene controls and professional cleaning. Marginal bone loss was evaluated in intraoral radiographs taken at baseline and after 1, 5, and 10 years of function. Results: One (0.8%) implant failed after 8 years giving a Survival Rate (SR) of 99.2% after 10 years. A total of 11 sites (9.2%) showed bleeding on probing (BP) at the 10th annual checkup. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.7 ± 1.35 mm based on 106 readable pairs of radiographs from baseline and from the 10th annual examination. Twelve (11.3%) implants showed more than 2 mm bone loss, and five (4.7%) showed more than 3 mm of bone loss after 10 years. For the latter, all patients were smokers and had poor or acceptable oral hygiene. All five implants with >3 mm bone loss showed BP and two (1.9%) showed suppuration from the pocket. For the remaining seven implants with more than 2 mm bone loss, no correlation to smoking, oral hygiene, bleeding, or pus could be seen. Time/marginal bone level plots of the 12 implants with more than 2 mm bone loss after 10 years, showed minor changes from the first annual checkup except for the two infected implants. Conclusions: It is concluded that good long‐term clinical outcomes can be obtained with oxidized titanium dental implants. Only 1.9% of examined implants showed significant marginal bone loss together with bleeding and suppuration after 10 years of function.     

Immediate implants supporting single crown restoration: a 4-year prospective study

BACKGROUND: The placement of implants at the time of tooth extraction has several clinical advantages, such as preservation of the alveolar ridge width and height and reduction of the restorative treatment time. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cumulative success rate of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets with and without guided bone regeneration (GBR) used to support a single crown restoration. All of the patients were preselected as candidates for implants. METHODS: Ninety-five patients aged 20 to 68 years with 163 implants were included. All patients were partially edentulous and participated in a personally tailored recall schedule. The follow-up period was 48 months. Patients underwent a clinical and radiographic evaluation annually. RESULTS: The 4-year cumulative success rate was 97%. Five of the 163 implants failed, two during the initial healing time, which were considered early failures and three a year after prosthetic rehabilitation, which were considered late failures. No failure of prosthetic rehabilitation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Implants placed into fresh extraction sockets with or without regenerative procedures and used to support single crown prosthesis showed a very high cumulative success rate (97%) in a 4-year prospective study. Several observations should be made: 1) all the patients were preselected as candidates for implants and were following a strict oral hygiene regimen; 2) all efforts were made to reduce the number of cases requiring GBR procedures; 3) all the implants had an acid etched/sandblasted implant surface; and 4) all the prosthetic restorations were single crowns.     

Evaluation of single-tooth restorations on ITI dental implants. A prospective study of 29 patients

From January 1992 to March 1997, a total of 30 ITI hollow cylinder implants were installed to replace lost single maxillary incisor teeth. Conical abutments with cemented all-ceramic crowns were used in 10 cases and the Octa-abutment with screw-retained metallo-ceramic crowns in 19 cases. One implant failed due to postoperative infection, and was extracted a month after installation. After a mean observation time of 3.4 years, the cumulative success rate is 96.7%. Only minor bone loss has occurred around the implants, and there have been no other complications to date. The implant system fulfills the requirements for good function and esthetics.     

Long-term success of implants replacing a single molar

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the long-term success and survival rates of implants replacing a single molar between two natural teeth and to evaluate the influence of implant characteristics on implant success. METHODS: The study was based on a consecutive cohort of 81 patients who received implants to replace a single molar between the years 1994 and 2004. Inclusion criteria for patients were having an implant replacing a molar between two natural teeth and follow-up data of at least 6 months. Data were recorded regarding the incidence of complications and success and survival rates of these implants. RESULTS: The range of follow-up was from 6 to 125 months (mean: 36 months). Smoking was reported by 18.5% of patients. The replacement of a mandibular molar was more frequent (87.7%), with 25.9% of the implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. Two implants were used to replace a single molar in seven patients (8.6%). The failure rate was 7.4% (six implants failed: three had broken necks, and three failed because of infection or bone loss). Complications included suppuration in 11.1% of implants and a pocket around the implant in two patients (2.5%). No relation was found among failure, complications, timing of implant placement, and smoking habits. CONCLUSION: A single implant can serve as a good long-term and predictable treatment modality to replace a single molar with low complication and failure rates.     

Alveolar bone response to submerged bisphosphonate-complexed hydroxyapatite implants

BACKGROUND: In most studies using submerged hydroxyapatite implants, maintenance of alveolar bone after tooth extraction was attempted with plain hydroxyapatite materials. However, clinical results have shown that hydroxyapatite may require biological modification with a bone resorption-inhibiting agent which may be beneficial for maintenance of alveolar bone. We conducted experimental and clinical studies to evaluate the effect of highly bisphosphonate-complexed hydroxyapatite implants on osteoconduction and repair in alveolar bone. METHODS: Porous hydroxyapatite implants were pre-incubated in 10(-2)M bisphosphonate solutions at pH 3.49. The implants had a diameter of 2.1 mm and a height of 2 mm and adsorbed 115 microg bisphosphonate. Five goats were implanted with 4 plain hydroxyapatite implants on each side of the mandible in root extraction sockets for the precision analysis of dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) measurements. Ten goats were implanted with 4 bisphosphonate/hydroxyapatite implants on one side of the mandible and 4 plain hydroxyapatite implants on the opposite mandible. In a clinical study, 23 bisphosphonate/hydroxyapatite implants were placed in periodontally destroyed tooth root sockets and followed up during one year. RESULTS: The range for the bone mineral density (BMD) measurement errors for goat histologic sections was 0.48% to 1.03%. There were large differences in peri-implant BMDs in the left and right mandible of the same goat, irrespective as to whether hydroxyapatite or bisphosphonate/hydroxyapatite implants were present. This was due to local anatomical differences typical of alveolar bone. These differences were not significant. Histologically, all bisphosphonate/hydroxyapatite as well as hydroxyapatite controls appeared to be fully integrated and effective as bone replacement material in goat alveolar bone. They exhibited vascularization and osteoconduction of alveolar bone growth along and inside their porous structure. In patients peri-implant healing was clinically and radiographically comparable to plain hydroxyapatite implants. All implants were retained and no dehiscences developed. Radiographically, peri-implant radiolucencies disappeared and alveolar bone was deposited in close proximity to the implants. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the understanding of the biological properties of hydroxyapatite implants as carriers for the bone-modulating agent bisphosphonate. Our study suggests that normal osteoconduction and repair occurred in alveolar bone around the highly bisphosphonate-complexed hydroxyapatite implants.