An evaluation of an intervention to assist primary care physicians in screening and educating older patients who use alcohol

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether providing physicians and older patients with personalized reports of drinking risks and benefits and patient education reduces alcohol-related risks and problems. DESIGN: Prospective comparison study. SETTING: Community primary care. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three physicians and 665 patients aged 65 and older. INTERVENTION: Combined report, in which six physicians and 198 [corrected] patients received reports of patients' drinking classifications and patients also received education; patient report, in which 245 patients received reports and education, but their five physicians did not receive reports; and usual care. MEASUREMENTS: Assessments at baseline and 12 months later to determine patients' nonhazardous (no known risks), hazardous (risks for problems), or harmful (presence of problems) classifications using the Computerized Alcohol-Related Problems Survey (CARPS). The CARPS contains a scanned screening measure and scoring algorithms and automatically produces patient and physician reports and patient education. RESULTS: At baseline, 21% were harmful drinkers, and 26% were hazardous drinkers. The patient report and combined report interventions were each associated with greater odds of lower-risk drinking at follow-up than usual care (odds ratio=1.59 and 1.23, respectively, P<.05 for each). The patient report intervention significantly reduced harmful drinking at follow-up from an expected 21% in usual care to 16% and increased nonhazardous drinking from 52% expected in usual care to 58%. Patients in the combined report intervention experienced a significantly greater average decrease in quantity and frequency. CONCLUSION: Older primary care patients can effectively reduce their alcohol consumption and other drinking risks when given personalized information about their drinking and health.     

A randomized, controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department--the DEED II study

OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and multidisciplinary intervention on elderly patients sent home from the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial with 18 months of follow-up. SETTING: Large medical school-affiliated public hospital in an urban setting in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 739 patients aged 75 and older discharged home from the ED were randomized into two groups. INTERVENTION: Patients randomized to the treatment group underwent initial CGA and were followed at home for up to 28 days by a hospital-based multidisciplinary outreach team. The team implemented or coordinated recommendations. The control group received usual care. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was all admissions, to the hospital within 30 days of the initial ED visit. Secondary outcome measures were elective and emergency admissions, and nursing home admissions and mortality. Additional outcomes included physical function (Barthel Index (total possible score=20) and instrumental activities of daily living (/12) and cognitive function (mental status questionnaire (/10)). RESULTS: Intervention patients had a lower rate of all admissions to the hospital during the first 30 days after the initial ED visit (16.5% vs 22.2%; P=.048), a lower rate of emergency admissions during the 18-month follow-up (44.4% vs 54.3%; P=.007), and longer time to first emergency admission (382 vs 348 days; P=.011). There was no difference in admission to nursing homes or mortality. Patients randomized to the intervention group maintained a greater degree of physical and mental function (Barthel Index change from baseline at 6 months: -0.25 vs -0.75; P<.001; mental status questionnaire change from baseline at 12 months: -0.21 vs -0.64; P<.001). CONCLUSION: CGA and multidisciplinary intervention can improve health outcomes of older people at risk of deteriorating health and admission to hospital. Patients aged 75 and older should be referred for CGA after an ED visit.     

Effectiveness of an intensive nutritional intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from a pilot study

The aim of this pilot study was to compare the effects of an intensive nutritional intervention with usual care conditions on dropout rate, body weight, lifestyle changes and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Thirty outpatients with T2DM but without insulin treatment (mean age: 57 +/- 9 yr) were randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups: intensive care (IC) or usual care (UC). Patients in the UC group were given advice about dietary and physical activity goals in one consultation session at baseline, while patients in the IC group attended five goal-oriented consultation sessions held approximately every two weeks from baseline onwards. Changes in body weight, T2DM knowledge, dietary intake, physical activity, HbA1c, and percentage of dropouts were evaluated at 1-year follow-up post-intervention. Fifty percent of patients quitted the program and were classified as "dropouts". Program completers were older and included a lower percentage of newly diagnosed T2DM compared with dropouts. A tendency to a negative association between attendance of the IC group and the likelihood of dropping out was found (p = 0.08). No difference was detected between UC and IC groups regarding changes in body weight, HbA1c or other outcome measures, at post-intervention or 1-year follow-up. This pilot study did not confirm advantages of intensive nutritional intervention in T2DM patients in terms of glycemic control, body weight, diet and physical activity. However, the high dropout rate may have hampered its effectiveness.     

Attrition in an exercise intervention: a comparison of early and later dropouts

OBJECTIVE: To identify reasons for dropout and factors that may predict dropout from an exercise intervention aimed at improving physical function in frail older persons. DESIGN/SETTING: An 18-month randomized controlled intervention in a community setting. The intervention comprised 2 groups: class-based and self-paced exercise. PARTICIPANTS: 155 community-dwelling older persons, mean age 77.4, with mildly to moderately compromised mobility. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome measure was dropout. Dropouts were grouped as: D0, dropout between baseline and 3-month assessment, and D3, dropout after 3-month assessment. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements of demographics, health, and physical performance included self-rated health, SF-36, disease burden, adverse events, PPT-8, MacArthur battery, 6-minute walk, and gait velocity. RESULTS: There were 56 dropouts (36%), 31 in first 3 months. Compared with retained subjects (R), the D0 group had greater disease burden (P = .011), worse self-perceived physical health (P = .014), slower usual gait speed (P = .001), and walked a shorter distance over 6 minutes (P<.001). No differences were found between R and D3. Multinomial logistic regression showed 6-minute walk (P<.001) and usual gait velocity (P<.001) were the strongest independent predictors of dropout. Controlling for all other variables, adverse events after randomization and 6-minute walk distance were the strongest independent predictors of dropout, and self-paced exercise assignment increased the risk of dropout. CONCLUSIONS: We observed baseline differences between early dropouts and retained subjects in disease burden, physical function, and endurance, suggesting that these factors at baseline may predict dropout. Improved understanding of factors that lead to and predict dropout could allow researchers to identify subjects at risk of dropout before randomization. Assigning targeted retention techniques in accordance with these factors could result in decreased attrition in future studies. Therefore, the results of selective attrition of frailer subjects, such as decreased heterogeneity, restricted generalizability of study findings, and limited understanding of exercise effects in this population, would be avoided.     

Mobile Health Technology to Improve Care for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BackgroundCurrent management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited by low detection of AF, non-adherence to guidelines, and lack of consideration of patients’ preferences, thus highlighting the need for a more holistic and integrated approach to AF management.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether a mobile health (mHealth) technology-supported AF integrated management strategy would reduce AF-related adverse events, compared with usual care.MethodsThis is a cluster randomized trial of patients with AF older than 18 years of age who were enrolled in 40 cities in China. Recruitment began on June 1, 2018 and follow-up ended on August 16, 2019. Patients with AF were randomized to receive usual care, or integrated care based on a mobile AF Application (mAFA) incorporating the ABC (Atrial Fibrillation Better Care) Pathway: A, Avoid stroke; B, Better symptom management; and C, Cardiovascular and other comorbidity risk reduction. The primary composite outcome was a composite of stroke/thromboembolism, all-cause death, and rehospitalization. Rehospitalization alone was a secondary outcome. Cardiovascular events were assessed using Cox proportional hazard modeling after adjusting for baseline risk.ResultsThere were 1,646 patients allocated to mAFA intervention (mean age, 67.0 years; 38.0% female) with mean follow-up of 262 days, whereas 1,678 patients were allocated to usual care (mean age, 70.0 years; 38.0% female) with mean follow-up of 291 days. Rates of the composite outcome of ‘ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism, death, and rehospitalization’ were lower with the mAFA intervention compared with usual care (1.9% vs. 6.0%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.67; p < 0.001). Rates of rehospitalization were lower with the mAFA intervention (1.2% vs. 4.5%; HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.60; p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses by sex, age, AF type, risk score, and comorbidities demonstrated consistently lower HRs for the composite outcome for patients receiving the mAFA intervention compared with usual care (all p < 0.05).ConclusionsAn integrated care approach to holistic AF care, supported by mHealth technology, reduces the risks of rehospitalization and clinical adverse events. (Mobile Health [mHealth] technology integrating atrial fibrillation screening and ABC management approach trial; ChiCTR-OOC-17014138).     

A multidimensional integrative medicine intervention to improve cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND: Integrative medicine is an individualized, patient-centered approach to health, combining a whole-person model with evidence-based medicine. Interventions based in integrative medicine theory have not been tested as cardiovascular risk-reduction strategies. Our objective was to determine whether personalized health planning (PHP), an intervention based on the theories and principles underlying integrative medicine, reduces 10-year risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial among 154 outpatients age 45 or over, with 1 or more known cardiovascular risk factors. Subjects were enrolled from primary care practices near an academic medical center, and the intervention was delivered at a university Center for Integrative Medicine. Following a health risk assessment, each subject in the intervention arm worked with a health coach and a medical provider to construct a personalized health plan. The plan identified specific health behaviors important for each subject to modify; the choice of behaviors was driven both by cardiovascular risk reduction and the interests of each individual subject. The coach then assisted each subject in implementing her/his health plan. Techniques used in implementation included mindfulness meditation, relaxation training, stress management, motivational techniques, and health education and coaching. Subjects randomized to the comparison group received usual care (UC) without access to the intervention. Our primary outcome measure was 10-year risk of CHD, as measured by a standard Framingham risk score, and assessed at baseline, 5, and 10 months. Differences between arms were assessed by linear mixed effects modeling, with time and study arm as independent variables. RESULTS: Baseline 10-year risk of CHD was 11.1% for subjects randomized to UC (n=77), and 9.3% for subjects randomized to PHP (n=77). Over 10 months of the intervention, CHD risk decreased to 9.8% for UC subjects and 7.8% for intervention subjects. Based on a linear mixed-effects model, there was a statistically significant difference in the rate of risk improvement between the 2 arms (P=.04). In secondary analyses, subjects in the PHP arm were found to have increased days of exercise per week compared with UC (3.7 vs 2.4, P=.002), and subjects who were overweight on entry into the study had greater weight loss in the PHP arm compared with UC (P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: A multidimensional intervention based on integrative medicine principles reduced risk of CHD, possibly by increasing exercise and improving weight loss.     

A Practice-Based Intervention to Improve Primary Care for Falls, Urinary Incontinence, and Dementia

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a practice-based intervention can improve care for falls, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment.
DESIGN: Controlled trial.
SETTING: Two community medical groups.
PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling patients (357 at intervention sites and 287 at control sites) aged 75 and older identified as having difficulty with falls, incontinence, or cognitive impairment.
INTERVENTION: Intervention and control practices received condition case-finding, but only intervention practices received a multicomponent practice-change intervention.
MEASUREMENTS: Percentage of quality indicators satisfied measured using a 13-month medical record abstraction.
RESULTS: Before the intervention, the quality of care was the same in intervention and control groups. Screening tripled the number of patients identified as needing care for falls, incontinence, or cognitive impairment. During the intervention, overall care for the three conditions was better in the intervention than the control group (41%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=35–46% vs 25%, 95% CI=20–30%, P <.001). Intervention group patients received better care for falls (44% vs 23%, P <.001) and incontinence (37% vs 22%, P <.001) but not for cognitive impairment (44% vs 41%, P =.67) than control group patients. The intervention was more effective for conditions identified by screening than for conditions identified through usual care.
CONCLUSION: A practice-based intervention integrated into usual clinical care can improve primary care for falls and urinary incontinence, although even with the intervention, less than half of the recommended care for these conditions was provided. More-intensive interventions, such as embedding intervention components into an electronic medical record, will be needed to adequately improve care for falls and incontinence.     

Adding pharmacists to primary care teams reduces predicted long‐term risk of cardiovascular events in Type 2 diabetic patients without established cardiovascular disease: results from a randomized trial

Aim To determine the impact of adding pharmacists to primary care teams on predicted 10‐year risk of cardiovascular events in patients with Type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease. Methods This was a pre‐specified secondary analysis of randomized trial data. The main study found that, compared with usual care, addition of a pharmacist resulted in improvements in blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, and hyperglycaemia for primary care patients with Type 2 diabetes. In this sub‐study, predicted 10‐year risk of cardiovascular events at baseline and 1 year were calculated for patients free of cardiovascular disease at enrolment. The primary outcome was change in UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk score; change in Framingham risk score was a secondary outcome. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the 102 intervention patients and 93 control subjects: 59% women, median (interquartile range) age 57 (50–64) years, diabetes duration 3 (1–6.5) years, systolic blood pressure 128 (120–140) mmHg, total cholesterol 4.34 (3.75–5.04) mmol/l and HbA_1c 54 mmol/mol (48–64 mmol/mol) [7.1% (6.5–8.0%)]. Median baseline UKPDS risk score was 10.2% (6.0–16.7%) for intervention patients and 9.5% (5.8–15.1%) for control subjects (P = 0.80). One‐year post‐randomization, the median absolute reduction in UKPDS risk score was 1.0% greater for intervention patients compared with control subjects (P = 0.032). Similar changes were seen with the Framingham risk score (median reduction 1.2% greater for intervention patients compared with control subjects, P = 0.048). The two risk scores were highly correlated (rho = 0.83; P < 0.001). Conclusion Adding pharmacists to primary care teams for 1 year significantly reduced the predicted 10‐year risk of cardiovascular events for patients with Type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease.     

An emergency medical services program to promote the health of older adults

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and effect of an emergency medical services (EMS) program that screened, educated, and referred older adults with unmet needs. DESIGN: A cluster sample design evaluation of an intervention conducted by EMS in one of two communities. SETTING: Two rural communities in upstate New York. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-eight intervention-group and 143 control-group community-dwelling older adults receiving emergency care from participating EMS agencies between February 2004 and June 2005. INTERVENTION: EMS providers screened intervention group patients to identify those at risk for falls, influenza, and pneumococcal infections and provided patients educational materials. Patients' physicians were notified of screening results to provide interventions. Control group patients were provided usual care. MEASUREMENTS: Variables included patient demographic and clinical characteristics, the proportion of eligible patients screened, patient risk during EMS care and 14 days later, and patient recollection of receiving educational materials and conversations with physicians regarding needs. RESULTS: Follow-up was successful in 245 (61%) patients. Approximately 80% of intervention-group patients were successfully screened for each item. No differences were identified for characteristics collected at the time of EMS care, but a notable number of patients were at risk for each item. No differences existed between the control or intervention group for process measures such as recollection of receiving educational materials. For outcome measures, only an improvement in pneumococcal vaccination levels was found. CONCLUSION: EMS screening of older adults during emergency responses is feasible, but a simple intervention of providing educational materials to patients during emergency responses and faxing notifications to physicians appears insufficient to address patients' needs.     

The anticholinergic risk scale and anticholinergic adverse effects in older persons

BACKGROUND: Adverse effects of anticholinergic medications may contribute to events such as falls, delirium, and cognitive impairment in older patients. To further assess this risk, we developed the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS), a ranked categorical list of commonly prescribed medications with anticholinergic potential. The objective of this study was to determine if the ARS score could be used to predict the risk of anticholinergic adverse effects in a geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) cohort and in a primary care cohort. METHODS: Medical records of 132 GEM patients were reviewed retrospectively for medications included on the ARS and their resultant possible anticholinergic adverse effects. Prospectively, we enrolled 117 patients, 65 years or older, in primary care clinics; performed medication reconciliation; and asked about anticholinergic adverse effects. The relationship between the ARS score and the risk of anticholinergic adverse effects was assessed using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: Higher ARS scores were associated with increased risk of anticholinergic adverse effects in the GEM cohort (crude relative risk [RR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.8) and in the primary care cohort (crude RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.4). After adjustment for age and the number of medications, higher ARS scores increased the risk of anticholinergic adverse effects in the GEM cohort (adjusted RR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6; c statistic, 0.74) and in the primary care cohort (adjusted RR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.5; c statistic, 0.77). CONCLUSION: Higher ARS scores are associated with statistically significantly increased risk of anticholinergic adverse effects in older patients.     

Rapid emergency department intervention for older people reduces risk of functional decline: results of a multicenter randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of a two-stage (screening and nursing assessment) intervention for older patients in the emergency department (ED) who are at increased risk of functional decline and other adverse outcomes. DESIGN: Controlled trial, randomized by day of ED visit, with follow-up at 1 and 4 months. SETTING: Four university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal. PARTICIPANTS: Patients age 65 and older expected to be released from the ED to the community with a score of 2 or more on the Identification of Seniors At Risk (ISAR) screening tool and their primary family caregivers. One hundred seventy-eight were randomized to the intervention, 210 to usual care. INTERVENTION: The intervention consisted of disclosure of results of the ISAR screen, a brief standardized nursing assessment in the ED, notification of the primary care physician and home care providers, and other referrals as needed. The control group received usual care, without disclosure of the screening result. MEASUREMENTS: Patient outcomes assessed at 4 months after enrollment included functional decline (increased dependence on the Older American Resources and Services activities of daily living scale or death) and depressive symptoms (as assessed by the short Geriatric Depression Scale). Caregiver outcomes, also assessed at baseline and 4 months, included the physical and mental summary scales of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with care were assessed 1 month after enrollment. RESULTS: The intervention increased the rate of referral to the primary care physician and to home care services. The intervention was associated with a significantly reduced rate of functional decline at 4 months, in both unadjusted (odds ratio (OR) = 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.36-0.99) and adjusted (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31-0.91) analyses. There was no intervention effect on patient depressive symptoms, caregiver outcomes, or satisfaction with care. CONCLUSION: A two-stage ED intervention, consisting of screening with the ISAR tool followed by a brief, standardized nursing assessment and referral to primary and home care services, significantly reduced the rate of subsequent functional decline.     

Effects of a multicomponent intervention on functional outcomes and process of care in hospitalized older patients: a randomized controlled trial of Acute Care for Elders (ACE) in a community hospital

BACKGROUND: Older persons frequently experience a decline in function following an acute medical illness and hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a multicomponent intervention, called Acute Care for Elders (ACE), will improve functional outcomes and the process of care in hospitalized older patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 1,531 community-dwelling patients, aged 70 or older, admitted for an acute medical illness between November 1994 and May 1997. INTERVENTION: ACE includes a specially designed environment (with, for example, carpeting and uncluttered hallways); patient-centered care, including nursing care plans for prevention of disability and rehabilitation; planning for patient discharge to home; and review of medical care to prevent iatrogenic illness. MEASUREMENTS: The main outcome was change in the number of independent activities of daily living (ADL) from 2 weeks before admission (baseline) to discharge. Secondary outcomes included resource use, implementation of orders to promote function, and patient and provider satisfaction. RESULTS: Self-reported measures of function did not differ at discharge between the intervention and usual care groups by intention-to-treat analysis. The composite outcome of ADL decline from baseline or nursing home placement was less frequent in the intervention group at discharge (34% vs 40%; P = .027) and during the year following hospitalization (P = .022). There were no significant group differences in hospital length of stay and costs, home healthcare visits, or readmissions. Nursing care plans to promote independent function were more often implemented in the intervention group (79% vs 50%; P = .001), physical therapy consults were obtained more frequently (42% vs 36%; P = .027), and restraints were applied to fewer patients (2% vs 6%; P = .001). Satisfaction with care was higher for the intervention group than the usual care group among patients, caregivers, physicians, and nurses (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: ACE in a community hospital improved the process of care and patient and provider satisfaction without increasing hospital length of stay or costs. A lower frequency of the composite outcome ADL decline or nursing home placement may indicate potentially beneficial effects on patient outcomes.     

Higher vulnerable elders survey scores predict death and functional decline in vulnerable older people

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) score predicts risk of death and functional decline in vulnerable older adults. DESIGN: Longitudinal evaluation with mean follow-up of 11 months (range 8-14 months). SETTING: Two managed care organizations in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred twenty community-dwelling older people identified as having moderate to high risk of death and functional decline based on a VES-13 score of 3 or higher. These older people were enrolled in the Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders observational study. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline: VES-13 score, sex, income, cognitive score, and number of medical diagnoses. Outcome measures: functional decline and death. RESULTS: VES-13 scores strongly predicted death and functional decline (P<.001, area under the receiver operating curve=0.66). The estimated combined risk of death and decline rose with VES-13 score, increasing from 23% for older people with a VES-13 score of 3 to 60% for those with a score of 10. Other measures (sex, comorbidity) were not significant predictors of death or decline over this period after controlling for VES-13 score. CONCLUSION: The VES-13 score is useful as a screening tool to detect risk of health deterioration in already vulnerable older populations, and higher scores reflect greater risk over a short follow-up period.     

Internet programs targeting multiple lifestyle interventions in primary and secondary care are not superior to usual care alone in improving cardiovascular risk profile: A systematic review

ObjectiveTo review the effects of Internet delivered multiple modifiable lifestyle interventions complementary to usual care on cardiovascular risk factors in the primary and secondary healthcare setting.MethodPubMed, EMBASE.com, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to June 2012 for English written studies that 1) addressed multiple lifestyle interventions, 2) used Internet intervention through websites or email, 3) included at least one usual care group not using Internet, 4) aimed to improve any of cardiovascular risk factors and 5) targeted patients aged 18 or older.ResultsOur systematic search yielded 1857 citations of which 9 were selected for this review. Three studies reported significant differences in weight loss in favor of the intervention group and five studies reported non-significant differences between groups. From the 7 studies reporting on blood pressure (BP) measurements, two found significant improvement in favor of the intervention group, while the other studies found no significant differences. Only one study found a significant improvement of LDL-C in the intervention group compared to usual care. Another study found a significant improvement of HDL-C in the usual care group compared to the intervention group.ConclusionThe addition of a multiple modifiable lifestyle Internet intervention in primary or secondary care is not superior to usual care with respect to prevention and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors. However, an Internet delivered program does have the potential of being successful in reducing the number of doctor's visits and may therefore be cost-effective when applied in large scale.     

Improving vision to prevent falls in frail older people: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of vision and eye examinations, with subsequent treatment of vision problems, for preventing falls and fractures in frail older people. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Community in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred sixteen men and women aged 70 and older (mean age 81) recruited mainly from people attending outpatient aged care services. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received comprehensive vision and eye examinations conducted by a study optometrist. The optometrist arranged for new eyeglasses for 92 subjects and referred 24 for a home visit with an occupational therapist, 17 for glaucoma management, and 15 for cataract surgery. The control group received usual care. MEASUREMENTS: Falls and fractures during 12 months of follow-up were ascertained according to self-report using a monthly postcard system. RESULTS: Fifty-seven percent of subjects fell at least once during follow-up. Falls occurred more frequently in the group randomized to receive the vision intervention (65% fell at least once; 758 falls in total) than in the control group (50% fell at least once; 516 falls in total). The falls rate ratio using the negative binomial model was 1.57 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.20-2.05, P=.001). Fractures were also more frequent in the intervention group (31 fractures) than the control group (18 fractures; relative risk from proportional hazards model 1.74, 95% CI=0.97-3.11, P=.06). CONCLUSION: In frail older people, comprehensive vision and eye assessment, with appropriate treatment, does not reduce, and may even increase, the risk of falls and fractures.     

Trajectory of substance use after an HIV risk reduction intervention

Background: Research assessments can confound the results of treatment outcome studies and can be themselves an intervention or form of aftercare. Objective: To determine the trajectory of substance use and substance severity in a sample of African American cocaine users participating in a community-based sexual risk reduction trial. Methods: Out-of-treatment participants were recruited using Respondent-Driven Sampling in two African American majority counties in rural Arkansas. They participated in either the sexual risk reduction condition or an active control focused on access to social services. They were interviewed at baseline, post-intervention, and 6 and 12 months post-intervention. Substance use outcome measures were use of crack cocaine, powder cocaine, marijuana, alcohol, and the Addiction Severity Index Alcohol and Drug Severity composites. A random sample of participants completed qualitative interviews post-12-month interview. Results: 251 were enrolled. Substance use outcomes did not differ among the two conditions at any point in the study. Use of measured substances and the ASI composites significantly decreased between baseline and post-intervention (p?<?0.01), decreases that persisted at the 12-month assessment period compared to baseline. Qualitative findings suggested that many participants identified increased awareness of their drug use and need to control it through the programs. Participants also noted strong bonding with interviewers. Conclusion: Clinical trials may have positive unexpected outcomes in terms of reduced substance use even though the trial is not substance use focused. Behavioral interventions for drug users that are not focused specifically on reducing drug use may nonetheless have unanticipated positive associations with reductions in drug use.     

Effect of a multimodality natural medicine program on carotid atherosclerosis in older subjects: a pilot trial of Maharishi Vedic Medicine

Although the onset and progression of coronary heart disease (CHD) involve multiple risk factors, few intervention studies have attempted to modify these factors simultaneously. This pilot study tested the effect of a multimodality intervention involving dietary, exercise, herbal food supplement, and stress reduction approaches from a traditional system of natural medicine, Maharishi Vedic Medicine (MVM). The primary outcome measure was carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a noninvasive measure of peripheral atherosclerosis and surrogate measure of coronary atherosclerosis. Comparison groups included modern medicine (conventional dietary, exercise, and multivitamin approaches) and usual care (no added intervention). Of 57 healthy seniors (mean age 74 years) randomized to the 3 treatment groups, 46 completed IMT post-testing. Carotid IMT was determined by B-mode ultrasound before and after 1 year of treatment. IMT decreased in a larger fraction of MVM subjects (16 of 20) than in the modern (5 of 9) and usual care (7 of 14) groups combined (i.e., 12 of 23; odds ratio 3.7, p = 0.05). For subjects with multiple CHD risk factors ("high-risk" subjects, n = 15), IMT decreased more in the MVM (-0.32 +/- 0.23 mm, mean +/- SD) than in the usual care (+0.022 +/- 0.085; p = 0.009) or modern (-0.082 +/- 0.095, p = 0.10) groups. Within-group reductions in IMT were significant for all MVM subjects (-0.15 +/- 0.21, n = 20, p = 0.004) and for high-risk MVM subjects (n = 6, p = 0.01). These results show that this multimodality traditional approach can attenuate atherosclerosis in older subjects, particularly those with marked CHD risk.     

Enhancing physical activity in older adults receiving hospital based rehabilitation: a phase II feasibility study

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Older adults receiving inpatient rehabilitation have low activity levels and poor mobility outcomes. Increased physical activity may improve mobility. The objective of this Phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of enhanced physical activity in older adults receiving rehabilitation. METHODS: Patients admitted to aged care rehabilitation with reduced mobility were randomised to receive usual care or usual care plus additional physical activity, which was delivered by a physiotherapist or physiotherapy assistant. The feasibility and safety of the proposed RCT protocol was evaluated. The primary clinical outcome was mobility, which was assessed on hospital admission and discharge by an assessor blinded to group assignment. To determine the most appropriate measure of mobility, three measures were trialled; the Timed Up and Go, the Elderly Mobility Scale and the de Morton Mobility Index. RESULTS: The protocol was feasible. Thirty-four percent of people admitted to the ward were recruited, with 47 participants randomised to a control (n = 25) or intervention group (n = 22). The rates of adverse events (death, falls and readmission to an acute service) did not differ between the groups. Usual care therapists remained blind to group allocation, with no change in usual practice. Physical activity targets were met on weekdays but not weekends and the intervention was acceptable to participants. The de Morton Mobility Index was the most appropriate measure of mobility. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed RCT of enhanced physical activity in older adults receiving rehabilitation was feasible. A larger multi-centre RCT to establish whether this intervention is cost effective and improves mobility is warranted. Trial registration The trial was registered with the ANZTCR (ACTRN12608000427370).